Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 157)

The budget deal President Obama hammered out with Harry Reid and John Boehner appears to have been the last straw for many Democrats—especially in the House. The Democratic caucus, including Nancy Pelosi, who voted against the budget deal, is feeling ignored and disappointed, and some have even begun discussing…

Continue reading …
NBC: Republicans Efforts to Reduce Deficit Are Endangering Public Safety

In an interview with Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood on Friday's NBC Today, co-host Meredith Vieira exploited recent instances of air traffic controllers falling asleep on the job to bash Republican efforts to curb government spending: “…the House signed a bill – passed a bill, I'm sorry – that would cut $4 billion from your budget. Are you worried about that?” In response Lahood proclaimed: “Of course we're worried about it. And I think these incidents prove up the case that we can't let money stand in the way of safety….Money will never compromise safety. That will always be our priority for the flying public.” Vieira followed up: “But just so I understand, are you saying that that $4 billion cut would negatively impact aviation safety?” What Vieira failed to explain was that the GOP proposal simply brought the FAA budget back to 2008 levels, still providing the government agency with $59.7 billion. Here is a transcript of the April 15 exchange between Vieira and Lahood: 7:09AM ET (…) MEREDITH VIEIRA: You know, Congressman Mica, the Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, says that it is wrong of the FAA to add air controllers at this time. He argues, 'This increase in staffing, when there is little to no traffic, also misdirects our resources and focus away from congested air traffic control facilities.' What is your response to that? RAY LAHOOD: Look it, we're not going to let money compromise safety. If safety is our number one priority and it takes additional controllers to get to the kind of zero tolerance that we want, that's what we will do. We will always find the money to make sure that safety is the number one priority for the flying public. VIEIRA: And yet the House signed a bill – passed a bill, I'm sorry – that would cut $4 billion from your budget. Are you worried about that? LAHOOD: Of course we're worried about it. And I think these incidents prove up the case that we can't let money stand in the way of safety. And we will work with Congress on making sure we have the resources to have the right number of controllers, well-trained, well-rested, and alert, in these control towers. Money will never compromise safety. That will always be our priority for the flying public. VIEIRA: But just so I understand, are you saying that that $4 billion cut would negatively impact aviation safety? LAHOOD: We're going to work with Congress to make sure we have the right resources to have controllers that are well-trained and alert in these towers. That's our obligation to the flying public for safety. VIEIRA: Alright, Secretary of Transportation Ray Lahood, thank you very much. LAHOOD: Thank you, Meredith. — Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.

Continue reading …
NBC: Republicans Efforts to Reduce Deficit Are Endangering Public Safety

In an interview with Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood on Friday's NBC Today, co-host Meredith Vieira exploited recent instances of air traffic controllers falling asleep on the job to bash Republican efforts to curb government spending: “…the House signed a bill – passed a bill, I'm sorry – that would cut $4 billion from your budget. Are you worried about that?” In response Lahood proclaimed: “Of course we're worried about it. And I think these incidents prove up the case that we can't let money stand in the way of safety….Money will never compromise safety. That will always be our priority for the flying public.” Vieira followed up: “But just so I understand, are you saying that that $4 billion cut would negatively impact aviation safety?” What Vieira failed to explain was that the GOP proposal simply brought the FAA budget back to 2008 levels, still providing the government agency with $59.7 billion. Here is a transcript of the April 15 exchange between Vieira and Lahood: 7:09AM ET (…) MEREDITH VIEIRA: You know, Congressman Mica, the Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, says that it is wrong of the FAA to add air controllers at this time. He argues, 'This increase in staffing, when there is little to no traffic, also misdirects our resources and focus away from congested air traffic control facilities.' What is your response to that? RAY LAHOOD: Look it, we're not going to let money compromise safety. If safety is our number one priority and it takes additional controllers to get to the kind of zero tolerance that we want, that's what we will do. We will always find the money to make sure that safety is the number one priority for the flying public. VIEIRA: And yet the House signed a bill – passed a bill, I'm sorry – that would cut $4 billion from your budget. Are you worried about that? LAHOOD: Of course we're worried about it. And I think these incidents prove up the case that we can't let money stand in the way of safety. And we will work with Congress on making sure we have the resources to have the right number of controllers, well-trained, well-rested, and alert, in these control towers. Money will never compromise safety. That will always be our priority for the flying public. VIEIRA: But just so I understand, are you saying that that $4 billion cut would negatively impact aviation safety? LAHOOD: We're going to work with Congress to make sure we have the right resources to have controllers that are well-trained and alert in these towers. That's our obligation to the flying public for safety. VIEIRA: Alright, Secretary of Transportation Ray Lahood, thank you very much. LAHOOD: Thank you, Meredith. — Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.

Continue reading …

It’s a miracle! Soon to be princess Kate Middleton’s face has mysteriously appeared on a yellow jelly bean, and it’s going to be sold on eBay. When new jelly bean store owner Jessica White opened a jar of mango-flavored jelly beans, “I saw her immediately,” said boyfriend Wesley Hosie. “She…

Continue reading …
‘Excessivley Partisan, Dramatically Inaccurate and Hopelessly Inadequate’

That’s how House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) described President Obama’s 2012 stump deficit reduction speech this afternoon. And understandably so. Ryan says he was “excited” to received an invitation to the president’s speech, and thought it was a potential “olive branch” to the GOP signaling the start of meaningful negotiations over the deficit. Not so, as we all know. I imagine… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Corner Discovery Date : 13/04/2011 23:13 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
NPR Finds GOP In Major Disarray, and ‘Most Republicans’ Don’t Want to Touch Medicare

On Thursday’s Morning Edition , NPR reporter Andrea Seabrook said most Republicans don’t like the Paul Ryan Budget (except the “far right”) and “most Republicans like Medicare, and they don’t even want to tinker with it around the edges.” Then anchor Steve Inskeep played up Charlie Cook suggesting Republicans have a “death wish” if they want to try and reform Medicare spending. STEVE INSKEEP: What exactly is it that some Republicans don't like? ANDREA SEABROOK: Well, one of the main ways the Ryan budget saves money over the coming decades is by shifting the Medicare into a private program with commercial insurance companies – in essence, ending the Medicare program as we know it today, as Mara was just talking about. That's OK with a lot of the far-right social conservatives and Tea Party-backed Republicans. But for those middle-of-the-road people, the moderate Republicans, and especially, Steve, the ones in districts with a lot of seniors, they are unhappy about this…. INSKEEP: Is this partly a function of polls that have come out since Ryan announced his plan? SEABROOK: Absolutely. There are polls that show that the majority of Americans like Medicare. In fact, most Republicans like Medicare, and they don't want to even tinker with it around the edges. They would like it just to stay the way it is, and that's making this whole plan a lot harder to swallow. Seabrook added that the conservatives are seething mad at Ryan over his vote for Project Labor Agreements: INSKEEP: How do Republicans like having Paul Ryan as, effectively, their leader on this very important issue? SEABROOK: Well, let me tell you a little story about Paul Ryan, Steve. A lot of Republicans are really, really angry with him right now. It has to do with a vote he made about a month ago that kept an anti-union bill from passing. It was about federal construction sites, and Ryan's vote is the one that made this fail. Later, a reporter [ Quin Hillyer at the Washington Times ] asked Ryan: Why did you vote for the unions? And he said oh, no, no. That was a mistake. I didn't mean to make that vote. And it looks a lot like duck and cover to those other Republicans who voted for it, the ones in states like Michigan and Wisconsin where all the union upset is. And then the Tea Party is angry at Ryan and the Republican leadership for letting the anti-union bill just die. They're looking like what they call RINOs, Republicans In Name Only, and a lot of Republicans are getting attacked on this. INSKEEP: And, of course, none of that has to do very much with the deficit, but it's a reminder that politics is a personal business, as well as a policy business. Will Republicans have the votes to pass Paul Ryan's plan? SEABROOK: Well, it has to do with that. I mean, a lot of those Republicans are asking themselves: Are we going to follow this guy off the plank for a bill that would cut Medicare, upset a lot of Americans after he ducks and covers from a vote he made? It really is personal, Steve. I mean, it comes down to that and the fact that this is such an unpopular idea. Seabrook portrayed the GOP in dramatic disarray, and Inskeep underlined that they may have a “death wish,” according to pundit Charlie Cook: INSKEEP: Well, let me ask one other question, Andrea Seabrook. Charlie Cook, the noted political analyst, was one of the first who said that Democrats looked like they were going to face trouble in 2010. He said that more than a year in advance, I believe. And now he is questioning the early signs for Republicans in 2012. He even uses the phrase death wish in a recent column. He asks if they have a death wish. How much are the politicians thinking about next year's election in all of their maneuvering now? SEABROOK: A lot. Steve, I've never seen Republicans act so much like Democrats. I mean, they're fractioned. They voted for leaders who are the old institution after an anti-institutional wave. They're just in disarray right now. They're still in disarray at the same time that they're pretending they've got it all together, and they're in serious negotiations with the president. Cook's “death

Continue reading …

A measure to defund Planned Parenthood was shot down in the Senate after passing the House by a vote of 241-185. The Senate vote was 42-58, with five Republicans rejecting the stand-alone measure: Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Sens….

Continue reading …

An Italian peace activist was found dead in the Gaza Strip hours after he had been kidnapped by a group of Islamic radicals. Vittorio Arrigoni, who had been active in the pro-Palestinian International Solidarity Movement for more than a decade, was hanged by his kidnappers, AP reports. The al-Qaeda-linked group…

Continue reading …

Speechless

No Comment

One hundred days and still no jobs bill. Democrat Joseph Crowley’s “speech” from the House floor.

Continue reading …

The shutdown showdown is almost officially over: The House today passed a measure to fund the government through September, the end of the 2011 fiscal year. The Senate is expected to follow suit later today. The measure passed 260-167, with dozens of Democrats making up for Tea Party conservatives who…

Continue reading …