Florida State Sen. Gary Siplin’s long quest to get the law behind baggy pants bans is nearing fruition. Siplin’s bill to make it illegal for students on campuses to wear clothes exposing their underwear has passed the state Senate, and a similar bill is making its way through the House,…
Continue reading …President Barack Obama was caught on an open mic making some blunt and intriguing remarks about the actions of Republicans in recent budget negotiations that produced a deal to avert a government shutdown at a fundraiser in Chicago on Thursday, CBS News reports. In audio relayed by the network, the president can be heard addressing unsuccessful Republican maneuvering to roll back portions of health care reform, as well as restrict Planned Parenthood from receiving federal funding, in reaching an agreement. “I said, ‘You want to repeal health care?’” Obama revealed at the private event. “Go at it. We’ll have that debate. You’re not going to be able to do that by nickel-and-diming me in the budget. You think we’re stupid?’” Ultimately, the resolutions pushed by Republicans targeting what may be the president’s most significant legislative accomplishment to date and the women’s health service provider failed to advance with the larger budget deal. “Put it in a separate bill,” the president said he told House Speaker John Boehner and members of his staff. “We’ll call it up. And if you think you can overturn my veto, try it. But don’t try to sneak this through.” CBS Radio News White House correspondent Mark Knoller heard Obama’s remarks, which the president perhaps did not realize were being relayed by the microphone he was using to the White House press room on an audio feed. LISTEN:
Continue reading …This one’s been in the works for some time now , but the White House has just today officially unveiled its plans for a national secure internet ID program — or as it has dubbed it, the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC). As expected, that will be entirely voluntary and largely driven by various private sector companies, who will be responsible for verifying your ID and providing you with secure credentials that you’ll be able to use across the internet — the credentials themselves could simply be a secure application, or something like smart card or SecurID token. The administration is also quick to point out that the system is not a national ID program of any sort, and it’s going to some length to play up the involvement of multiple credential providers, with Commerce Secretary Gary Lock saying that ” having a single issuer of identities creates unacceptable privacy and civil liberties issues.” Hit up the source link below for all of the finer details, or head on past the break for a quick video explanation. Continue reading White House unveils national strategy for secure internet IDs White House unveils national strategy for secure internet IDs originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …A UN war crimes court has convicted General Ante Govina and sentenced him to 24 years in prison. The verdict prompted angry protests from the country’s veterans, who consider him a hero. (April 15)
Continue reading …Failure by Congress to raise the US debt limit “could plunge the world economy back into recession,” President Barack Obama said, and he acknowledged that he must compromise on spending with Republicans who control the House. (April 15)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Take a walk down memory lane with me to the time in 2009 during the health care debate when the Tea Party/AFP contingents were hand-wringing over death panels. Remember that? Sarah Palin was sure Grandma was going to have her plug pulled, and Chuck Grassley et al joined in the fun. Oh yes, that was a summer never to forget. Hot, humid, and stupid. But. It was 2 years ago, after all, and so everything old is new again in reverse. Yesterday, Rep. Woodall of Georgia got all verklempt about those mean, mean, bad Democrats scaring seniors over their health care. A really interesting little verbal brawl ensues between Chris Van Hollen and Woodall, who ends up waggling his finger and shouting “shame on you!” Here we are today, in 2011. Paul Ryan has introduced his proposal to kill Medicare for anyone under age 55 right alongside Social Security, and they’re worried that seniors are scared? Click here to view this media They damn well ought to be scared. We all ought to be scared enough to never, ever let Republicans have a majority in either branch of Congress ever again. Even though Van Hollen focuses primarily on the donut hole closure, anyone 55 and older should understand that if they break the Medicare compact for the under-55ers, it’s only a question of time before they come back to the House floor claiming they have no money and break it for over 55ers. If you’re planning to live another ten years, you ought to be stone-cold shaking-in-your-boots scared and looking for a house in Canada. Or Sweden, which are the two countries Republicans cited in their arguments today as countries who made “deep cuts” and now have thriving economies. Two countries with single-payer universal health coverage . Two countries with higher marginal tax rates than the US and established procedures for promoting outcomes-based treatments in order to contain health care costs. Sweden and Canada, cited as models of cost-cutting success by Republicans. What interesting times we live in. [ Sweden : 48.3% effective income tax rate Canada: 31.6% effective income tax rate ]
Continue reading …PR guru regains control of Freud Communications from Publicis Groupe in deal thought to value business at up to £100m Matthew Freud has regained control of his eponymous PR and marketing agency from French company Publicis Groupe in a deal that is thought to value the business at up to £100m. Freud, who is married to Elisabeth Murdoch – who recently sold her business Shine Television to her father’s News Corporation – has bought back Publicis’s majority stake in a deal thought to value Freud Communications somewhere between £75m and £100m. He has been attempting to engineer a deal with Publicis, which took a 50.1% stake in Freud Communications almost six years ago, since late last year , but talks broke down over the valuation of the business. “We are grateful for the support of Publicis Groupe as a shareholder since 2005 and look forward to our future as an independently owned company,” said the Freud Communications chief executive, Nicola Howson. Publicis, which has advertising clients including Cadbury and Asda, said it will continue to provide PR services for its clients in the UK and globally through its own communications network MSLGroup. “I enjoyed working with Matthew and I have a lot of respect for his skills,” said the MSLGroup chief executive, Olivier Fleurot. When in 2005 Freud sold a controlling stake in the business, which has worked for clients including Nike, Pepsi, Sony and the London 2012 Olympics, the deal valued the company at €70m to €80m (£61m to £69m). Companies House figures for 2009, the most recently available, show that Freud Communications’ reported revenues were up 23% to £33m, pre-tax profits increased 28% to £6.7m and operating profits increased by about 30% to £6.7m. At the time, the business was running on an impressive 30% margin. No figures are publicly available for 2010, but profits are thought to be in the region of £8m given the improvement in the market compared with 2009. This is the second time that Freud has sold and bought back his company: in 1994 Freud Communications was acquired by Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO. Following AMV’s acquisition by US marketing group Omnicom, Freud and his partners bought the agency out in 2001. Freud also owns stakes in agencies M&C Saatchi and Engine Group. •
Continue reading …Washington D.C. was treated as just another pawn in the recent budget deal, and the whole thing is treated like a political game. Real people are affected in very real ways while politicians posture. It’s sickening: The compromise reached last week by President Barack Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner to reinstate a ban on D.C.’s ability to fund abortions for low-income women has, so far, been enveloped inside a bubble of political rhetoric . But the very real effects of the ban have started to take hold: 28 women who were scheduled for abortion procedures in the District today were informed by a local clinic last night that, as of midnight, they would be unable to rely on D.C. Medicaid to pay for those procedures. The DC Abortion Fund , an all-volunteer operated organization which has provided guidance to D.C. area women regarding abortions since 1995, sent out an emergency call late last night to raise funds for the 28 women. DC Abortion Fund’s Tiffany Reed says that the emergency campaign has been relatively successful to date. “We’ve raised over $3,965 so far in the last 12 hours,” Reed told DCist via email. “We’re still working to fundraise for the women who are scheduled today and then we have women scheduled Friday and Saturday who are just now being notified they can’t use their Medicaid.” The fundraising effort — which has included a $250 donation made by Ward 1 Councilmember Jim Graham — will continue through the weekend.
Continue reading …Washington D.C. was treated as just another pawn in the recent budget deal, and the whole thing is treated like a political game. Real people are affected in very real ways while politicians posture. It’s sickening: The compromise reached last week by President Barack Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner to reinstate a ban on D.C.’s ability to fund abortions for low-income women has, so far, been enveloped inside a bubble of political rhetoric . But the very real effects of the ban have started to take hold: 28 women who were scheduled for abortion procedures in the District today were informed by a local clinic last night that, as of midnight, they would be unable to rely on D.C. Medicaid to pay for those procedures. The DC Abortion Fund , an all-volunteer operated organization which has provided guidance to D.C. area women regarding abortions since 1995, sent out an emergency call late last night to raise funds for the 28 women. DC Abortion Fund’s Tiffany Reed says that the emergency campaign has been relatively successful to date. “We’ve raised over $3,965 so far in the last 12 hours,” Reed told DCist via email. “We’re still working to fundraise for the women who are scheduled today and then we have women scheduled Friday and Saturday who are just now being notified they can’t use their Medicaid.” The fundraising effort — which has included a $250 donation made by Ward 1 Councilmember Jim Graham — will continue through the weekend.
Continue reading …This story has been updated. MANCHESTER, N.H. – Gauging what the Tea Party thinks about any given topic is always difficult, since there is no real centralized leadership and even the nationally known groups have limited connections to the grassroots. But the reaction to the budget deal being voted on in Washington Thursday–from Tea Party activists organizing at the local level here and in other places around the country–was universally negative. “The [continuing resolution] was Washington as usual. We elected Republicans because we were tired of the behind-closed-door antics of the beltway boys and four months in we are right back where we started,” Andrew Hemingway, a 28-year-old small-business owner and the chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, told The Huffington Post. Hemingway has quickly become a sought-after Tea Party leader, with Republican presidential hopefuls ranging from former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) requesting audiences. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour was set to meet with Hemingway on Thursday for about 20 minutes, and he is organizing the meeting Monday between Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) and activists. “This CR was a joke and I expected more of Speaker Boehner,” Hemingway said. He added that Pawlenty, in opposing the budget deal, “is standing with the American people and I am proud to stand with him.” Much of the Tea Party was skeptical of the deal when it was reached Friday night, with House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) office trumpeting $38.5 billion in spending cuts. But as the exact number of those cuts has come into question, skepticism has turned into disappointment and anger. “I wasn’t happy with the outcome last Friday night and am far less so after all this began to come to light. The disingenuous nature of this deal is staggering and seems to be just more business as usual in Washington,” said Doug Mainwaring, a real estate agent and local conservative activist in Bethesda, Md. Mainwaring told HuffPost that “Boehner and the Republican leadership have frittered away a lot of the leverage they had.” “I’m not sure they have the political willpower to accept the mandate that was handed them from the Tea Party last November,” Mainwaring said. Jim Carley, a Tea Party activist and retiree in Des Moines, Iowa, told HuffPost that Republicans should have made Democrats vote against deeper spending cuts, “and you can hold them to the fire the next election.” “But how do you hold them accountable when you are the one that caved?” he said. National Tea Party groups were equally displeased. “The deal was cut in a back room, announced without specifics, members supported it without specifics and without reading the bill (shocking, right?), and now it turns out not to be even as it was vaguely presented. Sickening,” said Mark Meckler, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “And amidst all this, Speaker Boehner proclaims that there is ‘no daylight’ between he and the Tea Party. If he actually believes that, he must have his eyes closed,” Meckler told HuffPost. But even among the grassroots, there was a recognition that bigger fights over the debt ceiling and the fiscal 2012 budget should become the focus of the GOP now, marking a willingness to swallow the weak tea that the budget deal for the current fiscal year now represents for them. Bob MacGuffie, a conservative Tea Party activist in Connecticut, said the debt ceiling and the 2012 budget are “the main event.” “This is the fight worth having,” MacGuffie said. “We want to engage in a ferocious battle over the debt ceiling and 2012 budget–bring it on–we’ll give the Republicans a spine by holding our bayonets firmly at their backs.” UPDATE: 3:30 P.M. — The budget deal passed the House by a comfortable margin, by a vote of 260 to 167. A total of 59 Republicans voted against the deal, but according to ABC’s Jon Karl, only 27 of those no votes came from freshman House Republicans, who comprise the bulk of the conference’s Tea Party component.
Continue reading …