Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 611)
Anders Behring Breivik claims two more terror cells remain at large

Norway gunman pleads not guilty to mass killing and tells Oslo hearing he acted to ‘save Europe’ from Islam The man who confessed to killing more than 70 people in a bomb and gun massacre on Friday has claimed he belonged to an organisation with two more cells who remain at large. At a closed hearing in Oslo, Anders Behring Breivik admitted carrying out the attacks but pleaded not guilty to one of the worst mass killings in peacetime Europe, and told the court he had acted to “save Europe” from Islam. Breivik, 32, will be detained in complete isolation for four weeks, with no incoming letters or visitors except for his lawyer, while police investigate his claims to have accomplices. Breivik has previously said he acted alone in the attacks. “The accused has made statements today that require further investigation, including that ‘there are two more cells in our organisation’,” said the judge, Kim Heger, who warned that Breivik could tamper with vital evidence if released. He will be held for at least another month after the court-ordered solitary confinement. Breivik arrived at court on Monday morning to jeering from a crowd of around 400 people. As a police convoy approached the rear of Oslo’s central court, someone shouted then the crowd surged forward. Bystanders screamed “traitor” and banged on the windows of a police car after one man said he’d spotted Breivik in the back seat. A local book editor, Marius Wulfsberg, 54, described one bystander pointing at a man in the crowd as Breivik’s vehicle passed. “That man lost three friends on Nyota Island, what do you have to say now? But the man he was pointing at was just standing there, impassive. “People were angry, shouting, some were hitting the door of the car.” Just after 1.40pm local time, Breivik was hustled into an underground tunnel that led into the basement and then taken up to courtroom 828, on the 8th floor. The hearing was ordered to be held behind closed doors after the judge was informed of last-minute police concerns. Outside the sealed courtroom, reporters waited in vain for a glimpse of Breivik, who had initially requested to appear in court in uniform, and asked for time to explain his actions. Normally such a hearing would be held in open court, but many in Norway had argued that Breivik should not be given a platform to justify the killings. Breivik’s lawyer, Geir Lippestad, said his client had admitted to the attacks but denied any criminal guilt. The court acknowledged the need for transparency in the case, but after a 35-minute hearing, Judge Heger said an open hearing would not be possible “for practical reasons.” “It is clear that there is concrete information that a public hearing with the suspect present could quickly lead to an extraordinary and very difficult situation in terms of the investigation and security,” he said. Police had earlier put the death toll at more than 90 but on Monday they revised the figure for the youth camp massacre down to 68, with at least seven killed in the bombing. Earlier, a minute’s silence brought Oslo to a standstill as thousands flocked to pay tribute outside the cathedral. More than 10 minutes later, thousands were still standing while others converged upon the vast field of flowers that has steadily grown in the heart of Oslo since Breivik struck. The flag on the courthouse remained at half mast. Meanwhile, the search for victims continued. Police have not released the names of the dead, but Norway’s royal court said on Monday that those killed at the island retreat included Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s stepbrother, an off-duty police officer, who was working there as a security guard. In an interview with the Swedish tabloid Expressen, Breivik’s father said he was disgusted by his son’s acts and wished he had committed suicide. “I don’t feel like his father,” said the former diplomat Jens David Breivik. “How could he just stand there and kill so many innocent people and just seem to think that what he did was OK? He should have taken his own life too. That’s what he should have done.” Norway Europe Global terrorism The far right Race issues Gun crime Mark Townsend guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Brit Hume Admits That a Government Shutdown Would be Blamed on Republicans

Click here to view this media On this week’s Fox News Sunday — even though Brit Hume ignored the fact that Republicans have been forcing this hostage taking on raising the debt ceiling and that these radical Republican freshmen are out there denying that defaulting on our debt would be bad for the economy and are openly cheering for it instead — even Hume had to admit that Republicans would be blamed if they forced a government shutdown. I think the only reason more people aren’t upset about what they’re doing now is they don’t understand what raising the debt ceiling is or how dangerous and irresponsible they’ve been with using it as a political weapon. I blame our lousy media in America for allowing these “tea partiers” to first of all pretend they’re something other than Republicans, and then for allowing them to come on the air and spout nonsense with little or no challenge to their talking points. Here’s the latest on where this mess is now . It looks like the big questions are going to be where are these cuts they’re talking about going to come from, like potentially drawing down in Afghanistan and Iraq and whether the Republicans are going to try to force us to go through this all over again before the next election. WALLACE: And I have to, Brit, the most interesting aspect both from Boehner and Geithner, was that neither of them was willing to put the final nail in the coffin the grand bargain. Geithner left it open. And Boehner, when I offered it to him, said my deal, his deal, prior to the president demanding $400 billion more, is still on the table. Do you take that seriously? HUME: I do. But I think it is a practical matter. I think they both are willing, but I think the obstacles to it are too great and time is too short for them to get there. I just think it is too much. First of all, the components of it are so numerous and the amount of legislating that needs to be done to get it in place is so extensive that I just don’t think it is feasible to pass it in time. We are going to need to do something ahead of that, if we can ever get that done. The other thing that is striking about this is, you know we have the ratings agencies out there issuing these dire warnings and all of this. Remember, now, what are talking about here is to enact something that would keep the government going for a while. And there are going to be plenty more bites at this apple. I mean, the Senate never passed anything. There is no budget. And there will be another day of reckoning down the road. I mean, this is simply a measure to keep the government open for a while. But there is just no real budget. I mean, we have a long way to go and we’re going to be fighting this fight, it seems to me, again and again, which is why I think House Republicans would be wise to say let’s take what we can get on this and go along with our leader. The only worry I have for the Republicans-or the thing I think they should be worried about-is you pass this short-term, you know, six months or so, uh, bill, that keeps the government going. And with it a batch of spending cuts. And it gets rejected by that Senate and or vetoed by the president and we have this shutdown. Even though the Senate has never passed anything; the president hasn’t proposed anything specific that we can see. And the House will have acted, be the only body that really has acted. And still it is possible, it is the scenario we saw back during the Clinton years, it plays out again, for the Republicans to get all the blame.

Continue reading …

A poll commissioned last Thursday by the inside-the-Beltway political newspaper The Hill finds that “[l]ikely voters hold a dismal view of the news media, generally regarding reporters as biased, unethical and too close to the politicians they purport to cover.” Hill reporter Niall Stanage noted that the poll shows “68 percent of voters consider the news media biased” with “[m]ost, 46 percent, believ[ing] the media generally favor Democrats.” What's more, fully 44 percent of voters polled “believe the media are too friendly with politicians.” Also of note, nearly 4 out of 10 of self-described centrists see the bias as skewed in favor of Democrats, while only 19 percent of moderates think the media favor Republicans. For the full story at TheHill.com, click here .

Continue reading …
High court extends gagging order to prevent reporting of actor’s affair

Judge extends injunction brought by ‘world-famous celebrity’ to keep details of sexual relationship with former escort secret The high court has extended a gagging order obtained by a leading actor to prevent reporting of his “sexual relationship” with a former escort girl. The married actor, described by judge Mr Justice King as a “world-famous celebrity”, brought a privacy injunction to stop Helen Wood revealing details of his extramarital affair in April. In a judgment handed down on Friday, King agreed to uphold the gagging order but relaxed rules over how he can be identified. The actor – who has admitted to the affair – can now be identified as a “leading actor” and a “world-famous celebrity”, King said in the judgment. The media can also refer to the affair as a “sexual relationship”. The judgment was published online on Friday but was later withdrawn by the court due to copyright issues, it is understood. The judge added: “It seems to me that this is material to the public debate about the class of person who is seeking these injunctions and the status they are seeking to protect when preventing the publication of private sexual encounters.” No anonymity was sought by Wood, who has previously claimed to have slept with Wayne Rooney. Wood had offered information about her relationship with the actor to the Sun. Granting the injunction, King concluded that the actor was “likely to establish that he has a reasonable expectation that that which he does in his private life by way of sexual encounters, albeit with a prostitute, should be kept private”. The judge also pointed out that neither Wood nor the Sun had argued that publishing details about the affair was in the public interest. The injunction is the latest to be heard in the high court following a huge storm over the controversial gagging orders in May and June. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook Privacy & the media Media law Privacy Injunctions Newspapers Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Amy Winehouse’s father tells fans their love ‘means so much to my family’

Mitch Winehouse greets mourners outside north London home of singer who died in unexplained circumstances on Saturday Amy Winehouse’s father has greeted mourners laying flowers outside her north London home and thanked her fans for their support and love. Mitch Winehouse spoke to people who were leaving handwritten notes and bouquets in memory of the singer, who died on Saturday, telling them: “This means so much to my family.” The 27-year-old singer, who had a well-documented battle with drugs and alcohol for several years, was found dead at her home in Camden Town by her bodyguard. A postmortem is expected on Monday afternoon, and police have said only that her death is “unexplained” and that speculation regarding an overdose is “inappropriate”. Mitch Winehouse, who flew back from New York immediately after hearing the news of his daughter’s death, told her fans: “I can’t tell you what this means to us – it really is making this a lot easier for us. Amy was about one thing and that was love, her whole life was devoted to her family and her friends and to you guys as well. We’re devastated and I’m speechless but thanks for coming.” He appeared also to address reporters, many of whom he has known for several years. “You’ve got to do what you’ve got to do. I know a lot of you, we’ve been together for five, six years, I know you’ve got a job to do. I’m glad you’re all here anyway,” he said. The impromptu shrine outside her home features photos as well as cards and notes, including an image of Winehouse posing in a bar. There is also a picture amended by artist Mysterious Al, showing her face with monochrome cartoon eyes and a white lightning strike in her beehive hair. One note read: “Too fragile, too beautiful, too big a talent for this world” and another said: “To an exquisite singer with a beautiful voice.” The singer’s family, speaking for the first time on Sunday, said they had been left “bereft” by her death, describing her as “a wonderful daughter, sister, niece”. In a statement they said: “She leaves a gaping hole in our lives. We are coming together to remember her and we would appreciate some privacy and space at this terrible time.” It is understood that her body was formally identified on Monday morning. Scotland Yard said that later on Monday a postmortem examination will take place and an inquest into her death will be opened and adjourned at St Pancras coroners court. Amy Winehouse London Police Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
John Boehner’s Double-Dealing on the Debt Ceiling

enlarge If it appears that John Boehner is suffering from multiple personality disorder over the debt ceiling stand-off , that’s because he is. Torn between his duty to the national interest as Speaker of the House and to the Tea Party caucus that put him there, for months Boehner has ping-ponged between truth and lies on the debt ceiling. Long before he breached faith with the President on Friday, John Boehner tried to have it both ways on virtually every aspect of the debt ceiling crisis manufactured by the Republican Party he struggles to lead. As Jed Lewison documented, Speaker Sybil couldn’t get his story straight on Friday’s walkout. While he insisted during his press conference afterward that “we had an agreement on a revenue number,” in a letter that same day to House Republicans Boehner insisted that “A deal was never reached, and was never really close.” As it turns out, John Boehner’s duplicity started long before he picked up the Speaker’s gavel. In the wake of the Republicans’ overwhelming triumph at the polls last fall, Speaker-to-be Boehner was his party’s voice of reason on the debt ceiling. As the Wall Street Journal reported on November 18 (“Boehner Warns GOP on Debt Ceiling”), Boehner pressed his newly enlarged Republican caucus on the need to raise the debt ceiling and so protect the full faith and credit of the United States. “I’ve made it pretty clear to them that as we get into next year, it’s pretty clear that Congress is going to have to deal with this,” Mr. Boehner, who is slated to become House speaker in January, told reporters. “We’re going to have to deal with it as adults,” he said, in what apparently are his most explicit comments to date. “Whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations and we have obligations on our part.” If an increase in the current debt limit of $14.3 trillion does not pass, it would suggest the country may not meet its obligations and would shake the financial system. It could rock the bond market, rattle the dollar and scare away foreign buyers of U.S. debt. In January , Boehner echoed Paul Ryan’s warning that “you can’t not raise the debt ceiling” and Lindsey Graham’s dire prediction that failure to do so would produce “collapse and calamity throughout the world.” As Speaker Boehner put it then: “That would be a financial disaster, not only for our country but for the worldwide economy. Remember, the American people on Election Day said, ‘we want to cut spending and we want to create jobs.’ And you can’t create jobs if you default on the federal debt.” But that same month , Boehner was also insisting President Obama would have to make concessions to Republicans on the debt ceiling that George W. Bush, needless to say, never faced: The American people will not stand for such an increase unless it is accompanied by meaningful action by the President and Congress to cut spending and end the job-killing spending binge in Washington. After bringing the government to the brink of a shutdown over budget cuts demanded by the GOP in April, a newly confident Speaker Boehner made abundantly clear he would join the hardliners in the House and Senate holding the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling hostage. As Politico reported, Boehner set out to prove ” there’s no daylight between the Tea Party and me “: House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), fresh off the budget talks, told donors this weekend that if Obama wants an up or down vote on the debt ceiling he’s not going to get it. “The president says I want you to send me a clean bill,” Boehner said. “Well guess what, Mr. President, not a chance you’re going to get a clean bill.” “There will not be an increase in the debt limit without something really, really big attached to it,” he continued in a clip of his remarks at a fundraiser that was played during “Face the Nation.” That really, really big “something” turned out to be the draconian Paul Ryan budget . After refusing to endorse the Ryan Roadmap during the 2010 campaign, John Boehner joined 234 House Republicans and 40 GOP Senators in voting for the Ryan plan. But Ryan’s blueprint didn’t merely privatize Medicare, slash Medicaid and deliver yet another tax cut windfall for the wealthy; it would also add another $6 trillion in debt over the next decade . As a result, the GOP’s own Ryan budget not only violates the “Cut, Cap and Balance Act” spending targets they just voted for this week. It would also require the Republicans to raise the ceiling repeatedly in the future. In a rare moment of candor, Speaker John Boehner admitted as much. As Reuters detailed, Speaker Boehner told a gathering of Buckeye state Tea Partiers in April that the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling must be raised now – and not for the last time: The private April 25 meeting was convened by the Speaker of the House of Representatives at the request of Tea Party leaders, who were seething over recent Republican compromises, most notably on the 2011 budget. One of the 25 or so leaders, all from Boehner’s district, asked him if Republicans would raise America’s $14.3 trillion debt limit. According to half a dozen attendees interviewed by Reuters, the most powerful Republican in Washington said “yes.” “And we’re going to have to raise it again in the future,” he added. With the mass retirement of America’s Baby Boomers, he explained, it would take 20 years to balance the U.S. budget and 30 years after that to erase the nation’s huge fiscal deficit. If Congress doesn’t raise the debt limit by August 2nd, Speaker Boehner agreed with President Obama that the federal government could not guarantee that Social Security checks would sent out as required. And as Boehner explained just 10 days ago , that’s just the beginning of the dire consequences if the Treasury’s August 2 deadline is missed: “Missing August 2nd could spook the market. And you could have a real catastrophe. Nobody wants that to happen.” As it turns out, that’s precisely what many of his Republican colleagues want to happen. And in late June , Boehner joined the ” default deniers ” claiming the Obama administration’s warnings about that early August deadline were “scare tactics” and “outright blatant lies”: “Dealing with this deficit problem is far more important than meeting some artificial date created by the Treasury secretary.” Of course, John Boehner played a vital role in the creation of the massive national debt he now routinely decries. Leave aside for the moment that Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and increased the debt ceiling 17 times . Forget also George W. Bush nearly doubled the debt or that the Bush tax cuts were the biggest driver of debt over the past decade, and if made permanent, would be continue to be so over the next. Pay no attention to the federal tax burden now at its lowest level in 60 years or income inequality at its highest level in 80 years after a decade of plummeting rates for America’s supposed job creators who don’t create jobs . Ignore for now that Republican majorities voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush and the current GOP leadership team voted a combined 19 times to bump the debt limit $4 trillion during his tenure. Look away from the two unfunded wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the budget-busting Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 and the Medicare prescription drug program because, after all, John Boehner voted for all of it . Alas, that was then and this is now. And now, a Democrat is in the White House. Which means for John Boehner, raising the debt ceiling at all is now a ” concession .” As UPI reported two weeks ago: At a news conference Monday before heading to the White House for a meeting, Boehner said the only Republican concession Obama should expect is a vote raising the federal debt limit itself. “Most Americans would say that a ‘balanced’ approach is a simple one — the administration gets its debt-limit increase and the American people get their spending cuts and their reforms,” he said. “And adding tax increases to the equation doesn’t ‘balance’ anything.” Not, that is, for the unbalanced John Boehner. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …
Boehner still insisting on ‘cut, cap and balance’ plan

Click here to view this media House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) told Fox News’s Chris Wallace Sunday that any deal to raise the debt ceiling must be within the “cut, cap and balance” framework that has already been rejected by the Senate. “I am going to continue to work with my congressional colleagues in both parties and my House Republican conference to try to develop a framework within the cut, cap and balance effort that the House passed this past week,” Boehner insisted. “I think a preferable path would be a bipartisan plan that involves all of the leaders, but it is too early to decide whether that is possible.” “There will be a two-stage process, it’s just not physically possible to do all of this in one step. Having said that, Chris, I know the president is worried about his next election. But my God, shouldn’t he be worried about the country?” the Speaker wondered. “So are you suggesting you might pass a short-term plan in the House and in effect, dare the Senate, dare the White House to block it?” Wallace asked. “We passed cut, cap and balance,” Boehner said. “But they have been defeated,” Wallace noted. “You talked about putting a framework out today. You are saying you would not do that unless you have Democratic buy-in?” “I would prefer to have a bipartisan approach to solve this problem. If that is not possible, I and my Republican colleagues in the House are prepared to move on our own,” Boehner explained. “I continue to believe that a balanced budget amendment is the greatest enforcement mechanism to bring Washington spending under control,” he later added. Washington Monthly ‘s Steve Benen observed that Boehner’s threat to act alone may show that he is willing to let the country default on its debts. “What Boehner is describing is a path that makes his caucus happy,” Benen wrote. “Boehner’s comments this morning — ‘I and my Republican colleagues are prepared to move on our own’ — sounded a lot like a House leader who’s not even interested in finding a solution at all. His goal is likely to avoid blame, not to resolve the problem.” “In other words, Boehner sees the car headed for the cliff, and appears ready to put a brick on the accelerator,” he concluded.

Continue reading …
Grizzly bear mauls teenagers in Alaska

Two students suffer life-threatening injuries after animal attacks group on survival course in Alaskan wilderness Two teenagers have life-threatening injuries after being mauled by a grizzly bear while on a survival skills course in the Alaskan wilderness. The group of seven students, who were on day 24 of a 30-day backpacking course in the Talkeetna mountains, north of Anchorage, had been in single file for a river crossing when the animal attacked. The two teenagers at the front of the line, Joshua Berg, 17, from New City, and Samuel Gottsegen, also 17, from Denver, suffered the most serious injuries. Witnesses said the animal struck out at Berg first, turned to another student, then turned back to Berg. The pair were being treated at Providence Alaska medical centre in Anchorage. Both were in a serious condition, said a hospital spokeswoman, Crystal Bailey. The group was rescued early on Sunday after activating their emergency locator beacon. Staff from the Rescue Co-ordination Centre, operated by the Alaska Air National Guard, were called at around 9.30pm in response to the signal but a state trooper and helicopter pilot only found the students in a tent nearly six hours later. Four of the teenagers were taken to hospital in Palmer city, about 40 miles northeast of Anchorage, where they received emergency treatment, but the rescue team decided the two most seriously injured would have to wait for medically trained crew. Bruce Palmer, a spokesman for the National Outdoor Leadership School, which runs the course and organises excursions in Alaska and elsewhere, said: “Our basic goal is that when a student graduates from the course, they have the experience and background to be able to take other people out into the back country. We’re training people to be outdoor leaders.” Among the skills learned on the course is the practice of calling out, to alert bears of human presence in order to give animals a chance to flee. “The students say they attempted that,” Palmer said. Alaska Animals United States Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
British Apache helicopter injures children in Afghanistan

Aircraft gunfire responsible for ‘regrettable’ injuries in Helmand during attack on insurgents, Ministry of Defence says Five Afghan children have been injured, some seriously, by cannon fire from a British Apache helicopter, according to UK defence officials. It is believed they were hit by stray bullets during an intended attack on an insurgent as they worked in a field in the Nahr-e-Saraj district of Helmand province, on Saturday. The children were taken to Camp Bastion, the main British base in Helmand, for treatment, the Ministry of Defence said. Officials are investigating the incident which is likely to focus on the accuracy of the Apache’s cannon and the speed with which they fire. The MoD is expected to offer compensation in the form of ex gratia payments to the families of the children. An MoD spokeswoman said: “On 23 July, UK forces used an Apache attack helicopter to conduct a strike operation against positively identified insurgents who were seen operating in Nahr-e Saraj (south). Regrettably, five local children working in a neighbouring field were injured during the strike. The five children were taken to Isaf medical facilities before being taken on to Camp Bastion where they received medical care.” She added: “Any incident involving civilian casualties is a matter of deep regret and we take every possible measure to avoid such incidents. A shooting incident review is now under way and UK officials in Afghanistan are keeping the provincial governor abreast of the results of the investigation.” Isaf said in a statement: “We are aware of an incident in Nahr-e-Saraj where a known insurgent was targeted by a coalition helicopter. As a result of the engagement, five local children were regrettably injured. Subsequently, the injured were evacuated to an International Security Assistance Force medical facility and are currently being treated. “Isaf is currently assessing this event, and more details will be released as they become available. Coalition forces take every allegation of civilian casualties seriously.” Isaf has said reducing civilian casualties is a priority. More than 400 civilians were killed by foreign and Afghan forces last year and over 2,000 killed by Taliban-led insurgents, according to UN figures. Afghanistan Military Nato Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Somalia famine: Minister warns of starvation in rebel controlled areas

Somalia’s deputy prime minister tells FAO meeting that people in areas controlled by Al-Shabaab may starve to death if aid does not reach them in the next few weeks The vast majority of people in insurgent-controlled areas of Somalia may starve to death unless aid reaches them in the next few weeks, said Mohamed Ibrahim, Somalia’s deputy prime minister. Ibrahim’s blunt warning came at an emergency summit in Rome organised by France, the current president of the G20, and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) as the world community seeks to mobilise help to relieve Somalia’s first famine in 18

Continue reading …