Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 609)

Here he blows! Glenn Beck can always take a tragedy and make it darker for the victims. Apparently youth groups meeting from the left are now considered Hitler’s babies. If you side with the people or labor, you must be a Nazi sympathizer. The bomb in Oslo targeted buildings connected to the Labour Party government, and the youth camp on Utoeya island was also run by the party. I doubt you’ll hear Fox News or Beck mention that the shooter was a fan of right wing bloggers from the US. In the New York Times, Scott Shane looks at the undeniable influence of people like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller on the Oslo terrorist: Killings in Norway Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S. — And as usual, the most incoherent defense comes from hate group leader Pamela Geller: Mr. Breivik frequently cited another blog, Atlas Shrugs, and recommended the Gates of Vienna among Web sites. Pamela Geller, an outspoken critic of Islam who runs Atlas Shrugs, wrote on her blog Sunday that any assertion that she or other antijihad writers bore any responsibility for Mr. Breivik’s actions was “ridiculous.” “If anyone incited him to violence, it was Islamic supremacists,” she wrote. As I wrote yesterday, the chain of responsibility in this case is much clearer than it was in the Gabrielle Giffords shooting. There’s no doubt whatsoever that Anders Behring Breivik was seriously influenced by these people, and they know it. Their guilty consciences are showing. In the document he posted online, Anders Behring Breivik, who is accused of bombing government buildings and killing scores of young people at a Labor Party camp, showed that he had closely followed the acrimonious American debate over Islam. His manifesto, which denounced Norwegian politicians as failing to defend the country from Islamic influence, quoted Robert Spencer, who operates the Jihad Watch Web site, 64 times, and cited other Western writers who shared his view that Muslim immigrants pose a grave danger to Western culture. And Rep. Peter King still plans another fearmongering anti-Muslim hearing on Wed . As Markos points out, right wingers gleefully jumped immediately in when this story broke to attack Muslims. Right-wingers could hardly contain their glee when news first broke Friday of the terrorist attacks in Norway. None stepped in it more spectacularly than the Washington Post ‘s Jennifer Rubin. — Oh, they desperately wanted Norway’s attacks to be the handiwork of jihadists so they could continue justifying the trillions of dollars and countless lives wasted on our overseas adventures. Then, it turned out the terrorist was a white Christian conservative, and poof! They lost interest. I mean, how dare you smear an entire group of people based on the actions of just one bad apple? Then those same conservatives shifted into damage control mode when it also turned out that the terrorist was hugely inspired by the tea party. Jennifer Rubin should post an immediate apology or be fired from her job. C&L covers this topic as well as anyone ever has and since our book Over The Cliff hit the stands last year David and I do our best to be accurate about what’s being reported as the rise of violence erupts in our society. It doesn’t warm the soul to be right in the conclusion that we drew in our book.

Continue reading …

Here he blows! Glenn Beck can always take a tragedy and make it darker for the victims. Apparently youth groups meeting from the left are now considered Hitler’s babies. If you side with the people or labor, you must be a Nazi sympathizer. The bomb in Oslo targeted buildings connected to the Labour Party government, and the youth camp on Utoeya island was also run by the party. I doubt you’ll hear Fox News or Beck mention that the shooter was a fan of right wing bloggers from the US. In the New York Times, Scott Shane looks at the undeniable influence of people like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller on the Oslo terrorist: Killings in Norway Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S. — And as usual, the most incoherent defense comes from hate group leader Pamela Geller: Mr. Breivik frequently cited another blog, Atlas Shrugs, and recommended the Gates of Vienna among Web sites. Pamela Geller, an outspoken critic of Islam who runs Atlas Shrugs, wrote on her blog Sunday that any assertion that she or other antijihad writers bore any responsibility for Mr. Breivik’s actions was “ridiculous.” “If anyone incited him to violence, it was Islamic supremacists,” she wrote. As I wrote yesterday, the chain of responsibility in this case is much clearer than it was in the Gabrielle Giffords shooting. There’s no doubt whatsoever that Anders Behring Breivik was seriously influenced by these people, and they know it. Their guilty consciences are showing. In the document he posted online, Anders Behring Breivik, who is accused of bombing government buildings and killing scores of young people at a Labor Party camp, showed that he had closely followed the acrimonious American debate over Islam. His manifesto, which denounced Norwegian politicians as failing to defend the country from Islamic influence, quoted Robert Spencer, who operates the Jihad Watch Web site, 64 times, and cited other Western writers who shared his view that Muslim immigrants pose a grave danger to Western culture. And Rep. Peter King still plans another fearmongering anti-Muslim hearing on Wed . As Markos points out, right wingers gleefully jumped immediately in when this story broke to attack Muslims. Right-wingers could hardly contain their glee when news first broke Friday of the terrorist attacks in Norway. None stepped in it more spectacularly than the Washington Post ‘s Jennifer Rubin. — Oh, they desperately wanted Norway’s attacks to be the handiwork of jihadists so they could continue justifying the trillions of dollars and countless lives wasted on our overseas adventures. Then, it turned out the terrorist was a white Christian conservative, and poof! They lost interest. I mean, how dare you smear an entire group of people based on the actions of just one bad apple? Then those same conservatives shifted into damage control mode when it also turned out that the terrorist was hugely inspired by the tea party. Jennifer Rubin should post an immediate apology or be fired from her job. C&L covers this topic as well as anyone ever has and since our book Over The Cliff hit the stands last year David and I do our best to be accurate about what’s being reported as the rise of violence erupts in our society. It doesn’t warm the soul to be right in the conclusion that we drew in our book.

Continue reading …
Stuart Varney Affirms That Killing Medicare and Social Security Sole GOP Goal

Click here to view this media So Harry Reid is drafting a plan to “put our fiscal house in order” by cutting, cutting, cutting with no revenues. And he’s tackling what sounds like a counterintuitive plan by taking aim at the Pentagon budget, factoring in the cost of ending the wars, and other spending which is not spending on Medicare and Social Security. As Matt Yglesias points out, Reid is calling the Republicans’ bluff . In the debate over the debt ceiling, for example, Republicans have sought to portray themselves as having two bottom lines. One is that any increase in the debt ceiling must be met dollar-for-dollar with spending cuts. The other is that no revenue increases can be part of the deal. What Harry Reid did yesterday was essentially call the GOP’s bluff by outlining a plan that raises the debt ceiling by $2.7 trillion and includes $2.7 trillion in spending cuts, a healthy share of which comes from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans are rejecting this even though it nominally meets their demands. Why? Because it doesn’t achieve either of their two real objectives. In particular, the plan doesn’t cut Medicare, which means that Democratic party candidates for office in November 2012 and 2014 can accurately remind voters of the content of the Republican budget plan. In case you forgot, this plans repeals Medicare. Of course, if you listen to the Republicans talk on cable TV, they all shake their heads in very serious ways and insist that they are, first and foremost, all about getting the spending down. Doesn’t matter how, just that it happens. Never mind that Paul Ryan included some of Reid’s proposed cuts in his own budget that killed Medicare, that doesn’t matter. They’ll tell you ending the wars aren’t really cuts in the budget or spending because they are not “entitlements” Let’s review the bidding. Ezra Klein does it quite well: Originally, the Democratic position was that we should simply raise the debt ceiling . Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that reduced the deficit by at least $2.4 trillion — which is the size of the debt ceiling increase needed to get us into 2013. Then the Democratic position was that we should raise the debt ceiling through a deal that reduced the deficit by about $2.4 trillion , with $2 trillion of that coming from spending cuts and $400 billion coming from taxes. Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that disavowed taxes. Then the Democratic position was that we should raise the debt ceiling through a deal brokered by Barack Obama that reduced the deficit by $4 trillion, with about $3 trillion of that coming from spending cuts and about $1 trillion coming from tax increases. Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that disavowed taxes, and it would have to be cut between the congressional leadership of the two parties. Obama couldn’t have this as a win. So here we are with a deal that satisfies (sort of) the “no revenues” requirement alongside the “cut dollar-for-dollar” spending requirement. And as you’ll see from Stuart Varney, the answer will still be “no”, just as it has been all along. Varney: That’s why I say, the likelihood of this downgrade — let’s be clear — a downgrade means you lose your financial reputation, you’re not the gold standard any longer. Doocy: But it’s different than default. Varney: It is different from default. I am now saying a downgrade now looks very likely, bearing in mind this chaos over the weekend and this Harry Reid plan which means absolutely nothing to investors. Killmeade: It seems as though they’d say if we do something drastic enough that shows people that we’re on a fiscal sustainable path — something Titanic — we could avoid that, don’t you agree? Varney: I would agree with that. If we got our house in order and said we’re going to tackle entitlements, we’ll go after this, we’ll do something concrete. If you did that, the likelihood is that the stock market would go up. Unspoken but implied: The likelihood is that you’d get a deal on exactly the terms Republicans want. Destruction of the social safety net in exchange for an unchanged credit rating and raised debt ceiling. Our banker overlords are decreeing it, you know.

Continue reading …
Stuart Varney Affirms That Killing Medicare and Social Security Sole GOP Goal

Click here to view this media So Harry Reid is drafting a plan to “put our fiscal house in order” by cutting, cutting, cutting with no revenues. And he’s tackling what sounds like a counterintuitive plan by taking aim at the Pentagon budget, factoring in the cost of ending the wars, and other spending which is not spending on Medicare and Social Security. As Matt Yglesias points out, Reid is calling the Republicans’ bluff . In the debate over the debt ceiling, for example, Republicans have sought to portray themselves as having two bottom lines. One is that any increase in the debt ceiling must be met dollar-for-dollar with spending cuts. The other is that no revenue increases can be part of the deal. What Harry Reid did yesterday was essentially call the GOP’s bluff by outlining a plan that raises the debt ceiling by $2.7 trillion and includes $2.7 trillion in spending cuts, a healthy share of which comes from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans are rejecting this even though it nominally meets their demands. Why? Because it doesn’t achieve either of their two real objectives. In particular, the plan doesn’t cut Medicare, which means that Democratic party candidates for office in November 2012 and 2014 can accurately remind voters of the content of the Republican budget plan. In case you forgot, this plans repeals Medicare. Of course, if you listen to the Republicans talk on cable TV, they all shake their heads in very serious ways and insist that they are, first and foremost, all about getting the spending down. Doesn’t matter how, just that it happens. Never mind that Paul Ryan included some of Reid’s proposed cuts in his own budget that killed Medicare, that doesn’t matter. They’ll tell you ending the wars aren’t really cuts in the budget or spending because they are not “entitlements” Let’s review the bidding. Ezra Klein does it quite well: Originally, the Democratic position was that we should simply raise the debt ceiling . Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that reduced the deficit by at least $2.4 trillion — which is the size of the debt ceiling increase needed to get us into 2013. Then the Democratic position was that we should raise the debt ceiling through a deal that reduced the deficit by about $2.4 trillion , with $2 trillion of that coming from spending cuts and $400 billion coming from taxes. Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that disavowed taxes. Then the Democratic position was that we should raise the debt ceiling through a deal brokered by Barack Obama that reduced the deficit by $4 trillion, with about $3 trillion of that coming from spending cuts and about $1 trillion coming from tax increases. Republicans said “no.” There would have to be a deal that disavowed taxes, and it would have to be cut between the congressional leadership of the two parties. Obama couldn’t have this as a win. So here we are with a deal that satisfies (sort of) the “no revenues” requirement alongside the “cut dollar-for-dollar” spending requirement. And as you’ll see from Stuart Varney, the answer will still be “no”, just as it has been all along. Varney: That’s why I say, the likelihood of this downgrade — let’s be clear — a downgrade means you lose your financial reputation, you’re not the gold standard any longer. Doocy: But it’s different than default. Varney: It is different from default. I am now saying a downgrade now looks very likely, bearing in mind this chaos over the weekend and this Harry Reid plan which means absolutely nothing to investors. Killmeade: It seems as though they’d say if we do something drastic enough that shows people that we’re on a fiscal sustainable path — something Titanic — we could avoid that, don’t you agree? Varney: I would agree with that. If we got our house in order and said we’re going to tackle entitlements, we’ll go after this, we’ll do something concrete. If you did that, the likelihood is that the stock market would go up. Unspoken but implied: The likelihood is that you’d get a deal on exactly the terms Republicans want. Destruction of the social safety net in exchange for an unchanged credit rating and raised debt ceiling. Our banker overlords are decreeing it, you know.

Continue reading …
Amy Winehouse postmortem inconclusive, say police

Cause of singer’s sudden death remains unknown after autopsy as police say definitive results could take up to four weeks An autopsy carried out following the sudden death of singer Amy Winehouse on Saturday has not established the cause of her death, with police saying that definitive results could take up to four weeks. A postmortem was carried out on Monday, hours after Winehouse’s parents formally identified her body, paving the way for a private family funeral which could be held as early as Tuesday. An inquest into the singer’s death was opened at St Pancras coroner’s court but adjourned until 26 October. Janis and Mitch Winehouse made a tearful appearance outside their daughter’s north London home and spoke to mourners, thanking them for their support. Mitch Winehouse spoke to people who were leaving handwritten notes and bouquets in memory of the singer, telling them: “This means so much to my family.” The 27-year-old singer, who fought a well-documented battle with drugs and alcohol, was found dead at her home in Camden Town by her bodyguard at around 4pm on Saturday afternoon. Police have said only that her death is unexplained, and that speculation regarding an overdose is “inappropriate”. Mitch Winehouse, who flew back from New York immediately after hearing the news of his daughter’s death, told her fans: “I can’t tell you what this means to us – it really is making this a lot easier for us. Amy was about one thing and that was love, her whole life was devoted to her family and her friends and to you guys as well. We’re devastated and I’m speechless but thanks for coming.” He appeared also to address reporters, many of whom he has known for several years. “You’ve got to do what you’ve got to do. I know a lot of you, we’ve been together for five, six years, I know you’ve got a job to do. I’m glad you’re all here anyway,” he said. The impromptu shrine outside her home features photos as well as cards and notes, including an image of Winehouse posing in a bar. There is also a picture amended by artist Mysterious Al, showing her face with monochrome cartoon eyes and a white lightning strike in her beehive hair. Other less wholesome tributes were also on display, including half-full bottles of vodka and packets of cigarettes. Camera crews from around the world gathered outside her home on Monday as fans talked about their love of the singer, and some took photos of themselves in front of her house. Many left flowers and notes. One read: “Too fragile, too beautiful, too big a talent for this world.” Another thanked the star, saying: “Thanks to you I kept struggling in the toughest times.” At St Pancras coroner’s court the assistant deputy coroner, Suzanne Greenaway, said further toxicology tests will now be carried out to establish how the singer died. During the brief opening of the inquest she mentioned only the bare facts of her death. Amy Winehouse London Police Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Amy Winehouse postmortem inconclusive, say police

Cause of singer’s sudden death remains unknown after autopsy as police say definitive results could take up to four weeks An autopsy carried out following the sudden death of singer Amy Winehouse on Saturday has not established the cause of her death, with police saying that definitive results could take up to four weeks. A postmortem was carried out on Monday, hours after Winehouse’s parents formally identified her body, paving the way for a private family funeral which could be held as early as Tuesday. An inquest into the singer’s death was opened at St Pancras coroner’s court but adjourned until 26 October. Janis and Mitch Winehouse made a tearful appearance outside their daughter’s north London home and spoke to mourners, thanking them for their support. Mitch Winehouse spoke to people who were leaving handwritten notes and bouquets in memory of the singer, telling them: “This means so much to my family.” The 27-year-old singer, who fought a well-documented battle with drugs and alcohol, was found dead at her home in Camden Town by her bodyguard at around 4pm on Saturday afternoon. Police have said only that her death is unexplained, and that speculation regarding an overdose is “inappropriate”. Mitch Winehouse, who flew back from New York immediately after hearing the news of his daughter’s death, told her fans: “I can’t tell you what this means to us – it really is making this a lot easier for us. Amy was about one thing and that was love, her whole life was devoted to her family and her friends and to you guys as well. We’re devastated and I’m speechless but thanks for coming.” He appeared also to address reporters, many of whom he has known for several years. “You’ve got to do what you’ve got to do. I know a lot of you, we’ve been together for five, six years, I know you’ve got a job to do. I’m glad you’re all here anyway,” he said. The impromptu shrine outside her home features photos as well as cards and notes, including an image of Winehouse posing in a bar. There is also a picture amended by artist Mysterious Al, showing her face with monochrome cartoon eyes and a white lightning strike in her beehive hair. Other less wholesome tributes were also on display, including half-full bottles of vodka and packets of cigarettes. Camera crews from around the world gathered outside her home on Monday as fans talked about their love of the singer, and some took photos of themselves in front of her house. Many left flowers and notes. One read: “Too fragile, too beautiful, too big a talent for this world.” Another thanked the star, saying: “Thanks to you I kept struggling in the toughest times.” At St Pancras coroner’s court the assistant deputy coroner, Suzanne Greenaway, said further toxicology tests will now be carried out to establish how the singer died. During the brief opening of the inquest she mentioned only the bare facts of her death. Amy Winehouse London Police Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
2012 Olympics challenge: Hackney battles to preserve its edginess

Residents have seen the area change beyond recognition with the arrival of the burgeoning £496m Olympic Park Sitting in his Purple Garden, a fecundity of herbs, shrubs, wild bramble and community endeavour on the Lee Navigation canal, Sóna Abantu-Choudhury gazes out toward his new vista. All he can see are buildings, “big, grey Ikea blocks”, across the duckweed-skimmed water, smack behind an imposing electric fence 20 metres away. “Of no architectural value,” he said, above the drone of generators, staccato bursts of drilling and the beeping of reversing lorries, a cacophony of construction that has provided the soundtrack to his family’s life for five years. This is the Olympic experience for residents in Leabank Square, Hackney Wick, east London, one of the residential areas closest to the burgeoning £496m Olympic Park. When Sóna, 49, who works for Oxfam, and his wife Nadira, 36, moved to their flat 11 years ago it looked on to Arena Fields, a wild expanse partially tamed through guerrilla gardening and allotments bequeathed “in perpetuity” in 1900 to one of London’s most deprived areas by Barings Bank director Major Arthur Villiers. Nut trees self-seeded alongside apple, pear and plum trees. Children played under the watchful eye of parents away from the clutches of Hackney’s postcode gangs and nearby Gainsborough primary school used it as playing fields. Now the only view the couple and their two children, aged 11 and eight, share with other residents is of the international press and broadcasting centres and media bar and restaurant. Not for them the aesthetically acclaimed “Pringle” velodrome or Anish Kapoor’s snaking helter-skelter. “The beautiful architecture is for visitors landing at Stratford. That’s the sexier part of the park. We get these massive grey boxes, the arse-end,” he said. “We pleaded for a living wall to cover the grey to make our lives a little bit greener. They said it was too high. It’s like, these are just people who live in Hackney Wick. That’s how people feel, and it’s a real bone of contention,” said Sóna who, through his Leabank Square blog , has a finger on the local pulse. He, like others, agrees there are positives. Three in the square have managed to secure tickets, and it’s hoped local children will attend through the schools ticketing system. Jammed between the underbelly of the A12 carriageway and the canal, Hackney Wick and the neighbouring industrial slab of Fish Island are on the path that will link vibrant Victoria Park with the largest urban park in the UK for a century. The promise is of jobs as regeneration spreads throughout an area of residential estates jostling Dickensian warehouses and unlovely metal-shuttered workshop units. Already, London Overground trains glide into Hackney Wick’s spruced-up station every 10 minutes. Soon, just as in nearby Homerton, a hub of retail, residential and live-work units is destined to rise from the station surrounds. “The battle is not against gentrification. It’s how best to preserve Hackney Wick’s uniqueness,” he said, and he is hopeful the community can. Nearby The Hackney Pearl cafe-bar opened 18 months ago offering day and evening menus, including specials such as slow-roasted tomato and thyme risotto, as an alternative to the local chippy, kebab shop and Olympic Fried Chicken. Owner James Morgan, 43, an erstwhile painter, was drawn to the “nice bohemian feel” of an area now colonised by artists. Like Sóna, he sits on the Hackney Wick development board and shudders at the area becoming another Stratford City, which has a huge Westfield shopping mall. “I will be upset if we even see a Tesco Express,” he said. “But it is changing. Already high rents are driving artists out.” The fight is to prevent redevelopment draining the edginess, rawness and spontaneity that has drawn artists – with about 600 studios, allegedly the highest number per capita in the world – and seen the proliferation of galleries, such as The Elevator . At the entrance to Gate 14 of the Olympic Park, explosions of graffiti art enliven century-grimed warehouses, advertising this recent movement, which is celebrated on 29 July with the fourth annual Hackney WickED arts festival. Sipping coffee outside the nearby Electric Matchbox cafe in 92 White Post Lane warehouse studios, Al, 32, an artist and musician, worries that “a lot of this will disappear, rents will go up, and artists will be driven even further east”. “We don’t want a clone town that doesn’t link to the area’s historic past,” he said. Just up the alley the Hackney Wick Paint Yard, a graffiti-festooned yard used as backdrop for fashion shoots and Adidas advertisements, is being demolished. Stewart Schwartz, owner of the building, has plans to develop an artisan live-work centre there. “It could be like Camden Town,” he said. Unimpressed with the prospect of “people in white shorts running around tracks for three weeks” and the fact the Olympics has already forced him to relocate the printing business he ran from the buildings, he is keen to embrace the area’s artistic potential. At the Schwartz Gallery , space he has donated for communal use by tenants, curator Ismail Erbil describes the latest exhibition, A-L-L-O-T-M-E-N-T-S, as an artistic tribute to the allotments lost to the local community. It’s an example of how those here are keen to preserve a heritage that has also given the world the word “petrol”, matchbox toys, and dry-cleaning. “The Olympics are here,” said Sóna. After the grand closing ceremony, and as the park is converted, those in Leabank Square and surrounding areas “face another four years of building work, of loss of hearing, loss of taste because of the dust and loss of wellbeing”. “We have to ensure we get something back for our community.” Olympic Games 2012 London Heritage Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s accuser goes public as case nears collapse

Nafissatou Diallo threatens to launch civil action if case against former IMF chief falls apart On the morning of 14 May Nafissatou Diallo, an illiterate single mother from Guinea, entered suite 2806 of the Sofitel hotel in New York to clean the room. Hours later news of her alleged sexual assault by Dominique Strauss-Kahn was broadcast around the world. Diallo became “the maid”, one of the most mysterious and famous – or infamous – women in the world. Until this week the US and UK media have protected the identity of Diallo, a 32-year-old refugee and mother of a 15-year-old daughter. But now she has gone public, fighting to get her day in court as her case against the former French presidential hopeful appears close to collapse. “I want justice. I want him to go to jail,” she said in her first television interview. “I want him to know that there is some places you cannot use your money, you cannot use your power when you do something like this.” ABC will air Diallo’s full interview in the US on Tuesday. It follows an interview with Newsweek in which she describes in harrowing detail the alleged attack. Diallo has also described the aftermath of the attack. She said she had no idea who the then head of the International Monetary Fund was. “I was watching the news and they were saying he’s going to be the next president of France. And I say ‘oh my God’ and I was crying, they’re going to kill me, they’re going to kill me, I’m going to die.” She said that if this had happened in Guinea with “a powerful man like that” she would have been killed. Diallo’s case has been severely damaged after revelations that she lied to the authorities and a grand jury about her background. It was also revealed that she had fiddled her taxes and had a relationship with Amara Tarawally, a convicted drug dealer who used her bank account to deposit large sums of money. Strauss-Kahn is due back in court on 1 August and the Manhattan district attorney is believed to be considering dropping the case. Diallo has threatened to launch her own civil action against Strauss-Kahn. In the interviews Diallo is vague about her past life in Guinea, as well as the exact nature of her relationship with Tarawally, whom she called after the alleged incident in a conversation taped by the authorities. Diallo allegedly said: “Don’t worry, this guy has a lot of money. I know what I’m doing.” But Newsweek reports that the prosecutors did not have a translation of the full conversation, conducted in a dialect of Fulani, Diallo’s first language, and that subsequent investigations have cast doubt on that interpretation. She also appeared close to tears as she denied allegations made by the New York Post that she had worked as a prostitute. “I’m not. God is my witness, I’m telling the truth, from the heart. God knows that.” She is suing the paper. Strauss-Kahn’s defence had been strengthened by doubts about Diallo’s account of the attack. She reportedly went to clean another room after the incident. But according to Diallo’s account in the interviews, backed by information from the Sofitel’s electronic room keys, she visited another room only briefly, apparently to retrieve personal effects. Her lawyer Ken Thompson told ABC: “There’s no mystery, there’s no hiding the fact. This man attempted to rape her.” Strauss-Kahn’s legal team hit back at Diallo’s decision to go public. “Ms Diallo is the first accuser in history to conduct a media campaign to persuade a prosecutor to pursue charges against a person from whom she wants money,” said Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers William Taylor and Benjamin Brafman. “It is time for this unseemly circus to stop.” Stuart Slotnick, defence attorney and managing partner of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, called Diallo’s decision to go public “outrageous” and said it could damage the case. “She is violating all the rules. There aren’t many cases where the victim goes on the PR offensive; usually it’s the defendant.” The defence team would now be scrutinising the tapes for inconsistencies in her story and building an argument that she is out for financial gain, he said. “Her lawyer has already attacked the district attorney’s office. He isn’t doing this because he’s a women’s rights activist; he stands to make a lot of money.” Slotnick said he expected the district attorney’s office and Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers to subpoena ABC and Newsweek as they sift through the interviews for more evidence. Diallo’s decision to waive her anonymity was barely newsworthy in France, where the media have been naming her and giving personal details, including the name and age of her daughter, their address and even photographs, since her identity was first known. On Monday, French radio France-Info described her decision to give an interview as a “media offensive”. David Koubbi, the lawyer representing the French writer Tristane Banon, 32, who claims Strauss-Kahn sexually attacked her when she went to interview him for a book she was writing in 2003, met Diallo in New York last week. Banon has lodged a lawsuit for attempted rape against Strauss-Kahn in France, which is currently under preliminary investigation to see whether the case should go ahead. Koubbi has said he found Diallo credible. “She told me she had not lied. She said it forcefully and she repeated it.” Dominique Strauss-Kahn IMF New York United States France ABC Dominic Rushe Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Murdoch interview could have been tougher, admits WSJ special committee

Body that oversees paper’s editorial integrity says it was slow to cover story, but is now making up with ‘aggressive coverage’ The Wall Street Journal “could have done a better job” when it published an interview with proprietor Rupert Murdoch in which he said News Corporation had made only “minor mistakes” in managing the phone-hacking scandal, according to the paper’s special editorial committee. In a report published in the Journal on Monday designed to answer critics of its phone-hacking coverage, the committee – set up when Murdoch bought the paper in 2007 – admitted that its journalists failed to cover the scandal as promptly as its rivals. It also offered criticism of a one-sided interview earlier this month, just 24 hours before News Corp lost two of its most senior newspaper executives, including Les Hinton, who was responsible for the Dow Jones newswires. “[The Journal] could have done a better job with a recent story allowing Mr Murdoch to get his side of the story on the record without tougher questioning,” the report said, adding “We have discussed this with the involved editors.” However, in response to a political request for evidence that the US journalists were not involved in wrongdoing last week, the committee found “nothing to even hint that the sort of misdeeds alleged in London have somehow crept into [WSJ publisher] Dow Jones”. In one critical paragraph of the Journal’s coverage of a scandal that has rocked the company, the UK political establishment and police authorities, the committee wrote: “The Journal was slower than it should have been at the outset to pursue the phone-hacking scandal story, in our opinion, though it is doing much better now with aggressive coverage, fitting placement in the paper, and unflinching headlines.” Last Friday, two days after Rupert Murdoch and his heir apparent James appeared before parliament, the Journal broke the news that the justice department is preparing wide-ranging subpoenas to gather evidence in the phone hacking case. The committee had nothing to say about the WSJ editorial published last week that accused journalists at the Guardian and other news outlets for pushing coverage of the phone-hacking story for “commercial and ideological motives”. Much of the committee’s evidence seems to have been gathered by asking relevant editors and reporters: “Is anybody putting political, ideological or commercial pressure on you to influence your news judgment?” The answer, perhaps unsurprisingly, is “no”. The report comes after the Journal, edited by Robert Thomson, a former editor of the Times in London, has come under heavy criticism from rival media organisations in recent weeks. New York Times columnist Joe Nocera, who has previously written in support of Murdoch ownership, said : “The Journal was turned into a propaganda vehicle for its owner’s conservative views. That’s half the definition of Fox-ification. The other half is that Murdoch’s media outlets must shill for his business interests. With the News of the World scandal, the Journal has now shown itself willing to do that, too.” The members of the special committee to oversee the editorial integrity of the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires include Thomas Bray, former Detroit News opinion editor, Louis Boccardi, former head of AP, Jack Fuller, former president of Tribune Publishing Co, Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the MIT Media Lab, and Susan Phillips, former dean of the George Washington University business school. They are each paid $100,000 a year to keep an eye on the standards and ethics of the WSJ and Dow Jones Newswires, according to PaidContent. This is understood to be the first report they have published. •

Continue reading …
Trump to GOP: Force U.S. default to make sure Obama isn’t re-elected

Click here to view this media Conservative real estate titan Donald Trump told Fox News Monday that Republicans should make sure President Barack Obama isn’t re-elected by refusing any comprehensive deal to raise the debt ceiling, even going so far as to suggest that the country should be allowed to default on its debts. “Obama doesn’t want the six-month extension because that almost ensures he doesn’t get re-elected,” Trump told Fox & Friends hosts Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade. “I think, frankly, the Republicans would be crazy, unless they get 100 percent of the deal that they want right now, to make any deal.” “The fact is that unless Republicans get 100 percent of what they want — and that may include getting rid of Obamacare which is a total disaster — they should not make a deal other than a minor extension which would take you before the elections which would ensure that Obama doesn’t get elected, which would be a great thing.” “If you look at the average American when they’re polled, it seems the President of the United States gets less of the blame than Republicans do, but you see Republicans with maximum leverage,” Kilmeade observed. “Absolutely. The Republicans have the leverage. I don’t care about polls. When it comes time to default, they’re not going to remember any of the Republicans’ names. They are going to remember in history books one name, and that’s Obama,” Trump opined.

Continue reading …