Demand the Media Tell the Truth of How the Public Views Debt Ceiling and Balanced Budget Amendment
July 25, 2011 No CommentThe media’s unwillingness to release all the facts concerning the debt ceiling debate is nothing short of censorship. In their enthusiasm as cheerleaders for this President, the media are deliberately hiding and distorting the truth to further their own ideologically driven, leftist agenda. These so-called 'news' outlets are ignoring the voice of the American people. It is a tragedy that we even have to demand this: Tell the truth, the whole truth . Report the news. Editor's Note: For the full press release, click here . Click here for the MRCAction.org petition to stand up to the media's distortion of the national debt issue.
Continue reading …
Authorities accused of muzzling media coverage after crash in Zhejiang province kills at least 38 people and injures 192 Chinese authorities face growing public fury over the high-speed train crash that killed at least 38 people and injured 192, with the disposal of wreckage and attempts to control coverage of the incident prompting allegations of a cover-up. The railways ministry has apologised for the collision in eastern Zhejiang province and announced an inquiry. Spokesman Wang Yongping added: “China’s high-speed rail technology is up to date and up to standard, and we still have faith in it.” Internet users attacked the government’s response to the disaster after authorities muzzled media coverage and urged reporters to focus on rescue efforts. “We have the right to know the truth!” wrote one microblogger called kangfu xiaodingdang. “That’s our basic right!” Leaked propaganda directives ordered journalists not to investigate the causes and footage emerged of bulldozers shovelling dirt over carriages. Wang, the railways spokesman, said no one could or would bury the story. He said a colleague told him the wreckage was needed to fill in a muddy ditch to make rescue efforts easier. But Hong Kong University’s China Media Project said propaganda authorities have ordered media not to send reporters to the scene, not to report too frequently and not to link the story to high-speed rail development. “There must be no seeking after the causes [of the accident], rather, statements from authoritative departments must be followed,” said one directive . Another ordered: “No calling into doubt, no development [of further issues], no speculation, and no dissemination [of such things] on personal microblogs!” Officials also ordered more coverage of “extremely moving” stories, such as blood donations, and said the overall theme should be “great love in the face of great disaster”. Beijing sees high-speed rail as a matter of national prestige, highlighting China’s development, but critics appear to see the disaster as symptomatic of the country’s problems. Internet users repeatedly described the crash as a man-made, not a natural disaster, and blamed officials. “When a country is so corrupt that one lightning strike can cause a train crash … none of us is exempt. China today is a train rushing through a lightning storm … we are all passengers,” ran one of the most frequently forwarded comments on the Twitter-like Sina Weibo service. The breakneck pace of the massive project had already caused safety concerns. In just a few years Beijing has constructed the world’s largest high-speed network, with 10,500 miles completed or under construction. “Overly rapid development has caused safety issues. This is the result of the irrational behaviour of the former leadership of the ministry of railways,” said Professor Zhao Jian, a prominent critic of high-speed rail at Beijing Jiaotong University. The former railways minister Liu Zhijun, one of the project’s keenest champions, was sacked in February for “serious disciplinary violations” – a phrase usually indicating corruption allegations. Six carriages were derailed and four of those plunged 20 to 30 metres from a viaduct in Saturday’s crash, when a train stalled after being struck by lightning and was rammed by another one behind it. State media said the power failure knocked out an electronic safety system that should have alerted the second train to the problem. Zhao said the trains should have been equipped with an automatic braking system and that dispatchers should also have been able to halt the second vehicle. Chinese media had already highlighted the problem of lightning strikes after they halted several other trains earlier this month – including on the recently opened Beijing-Shanghai link . The state-run English language Global Times newspaper said the accident should be “a bloody lesson for the entire railway industry in China”, but said the crash should lead to “safer, not slower, railway transportation”. The Zhejiang crash involved the first-generation high-speed trains, launched four years ago, which have a top speed of 155 mph. The former railways minister said newer trains would travel at 217mph, but after his ousting that was cut to 186mph amid safety and financial concerns. China’s railway system has been regarded as having a generally good safety record, although 72 people died in 2008 when an express train from Beijing to Qingdao derailed. China Rail transport Press freedom Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Draft legislation permits opposition groups to Ba’ath party for the first time in decades, but move met with scepticism by activists Syria’s cabinet has backed a draft law to allow rival political parties to the ruling Ba’ath party of president Bashar al-Assad for the first time in decades, but the move has been largely dismissed by opposition groups as an empty gesture. The draft law, which must be ratified by parliament, permits parties that commit to “principles of democracy” but prohibits those affiliated to organisations outside Syria and those based on religion, tribe, denomination or profession, the state media agency Sana reported. If implemented fully, it could end decades of monopoly by the Ba’ath party, which banned opposition groups in the country after coming to power in a military coup in 1963. In 1972 Assad’s father and former president Hafez allowed parties willing to form a coalition with the Ba’ath party under the National Progressive Front, for which 167 of 250 seats in the parliament are reserved, but the other parties are mainly window-dressing for Ba’athist rule. Syrian officials have increasingly spoken of a transition to democracy, showing how far protesters have pushed regime discourse in more than four months of protests. But the move was met with widespread scepticism by activists and opposition figures, inside and outside the country who say words have not been followed by actions. “Bashar al-Assad has made tremendous concessions – he lifted the state of emergency which was the top demand of the Syrian opposition of the last 40 years, but the security killed people the next day,” said Radwan Ziadeh, a Syrian dissident and rights activist exiled in the US. “These decisions are documents only. There is no guarantee any party will be licensed just in the way no protest has been under the new law for demonstrations.” Under the new law the government retains control over the formation of parties, which must apply for a licence to operate. New parties must also respect the constitution, which enshrines the dominance of the Ba’ath party as the “leading party in state and society” despite Assad’s promises to look at altering it. The criteria would also continue to outlaw Kurdish parties, which operate in the north-east as the most organised of Syria’s political opposition. Opposition figures have emphasised that there can be no dialogue or trust in the regime’s reform programme until the security crackdown stops. Human rights groups say more than 1,500 civilians have been killed and more than 12,000 detained since the uprising started in mid-March. Activists reported ongoing detentions across the country as well as a continued clampdown in the neighbourhood of Bab Sbaa in Homs. Protests have intensified in the week before Ramadan when analysts and diplomats say they expect demonstrations to grow in frequency and size. A sit-in by 200 lawyers at the Justice Palace in Damascus on Monday turned into a brawl after pro-regime lawyers arrived, the local co-ordinating committees reported, hours after security forces carried out raids in the Damascus suburb of Hajr al-Aswad. The suburb is home to many Palestinians and Syrians from the Golan heights displaced after it was captured by Israel in 1967 and illegally annexed in 1981. Nour Ali is a pseudonym for a journalist in Damascus Syria Middle East Protest Arab and Middle East unrest guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
County forces act jointly to make it easier to bug suspects’ computers and phones and carry out covert investigations Britain’s police forces are forming regional surveillance units with the power to carry out covert and intrusive investigations. Detectives believe the groups will make it easier for the authorities to bug computers, break into properties and interfere with wireless internet networks as part of countersurveillance operations, according to documents seen by the Guardian. Until recently, covert investigations were carried out by individual forces in co-operation with the Serious Organised Crime Agency , which is being disbanded. The disclosures have concerned civil liberties campaigners who fear that it will lead to an increase in covert operations. They want to know how the new regional police groups will be controlled and monitored. Documents obtained by the Guardian reveal that earlier this month five forces – Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire and Nottinghamshire – formed the East Midlands Technical Surveillance Unit (Emtsu) after a series of internal consultations that took place behind closed doors in March. Detective Chief Superintendent Ian Waterfield of Nottinghamshire police wrote in an internal paper that the new £2m-a-year organisation would improve access to hi-tech surveillance as well as the planting of bugs. ” Emtsu (pdf) will provide Nottinghamshire with a ‘one-stop shop’ approach to covert forensics, covert hi-tech crime and specialist support unit, which will include covert entry into premises, covert search and the deployment of intrusive surveillance methods,” he said. The contract between the five East Midlands forces contains a clause that prohibits each force from taking steps to publicise the existence of the unit or its investigations without express consent of each party. It also prevents internal reports about the formation of the units being published on their websites under the Local Government Act on the grounds that they relate to the prevention, investigation or prosecution of crime. There are believed to be at least seven other regional organisations, according to police sources. One, calling itself the South East Covert Operations Unit (Secou), was formed by Hampshire, Surrey, Sussex and Thames Valley police authorities last year. The use of covert surveillance by police has been a key weapon in fighting organised crime and terrorism, according to police. One former Metropolitan police specialist believes the development will make it easier and cheaper for the authorities to conduct countersurveillance operations including “covert forensics” – a method of hi-tech spying involving installing keyloggers on suspects’ computers to record what they type. Jonathan Krause, an ex-member of Scotland Yard’s hi-tech crime unit, said he had heard of police surveillance officers disguised as plumbers entering suspects’ homes to bug computers. “They can sit outside the house in a van and they’ll be looking at the wireless networks and the wireless traffic,” he said. “Which is not that difficult to do technically, breaking in to wireless networks and seeing the traffic going back and forth.” Krause, who now works as the managing director of computer company Forensic Control , explained that forms of “live” covert surveillance on computers are on the rise due to an increase in users storing their data online – known as “cloud computing”. As a result, he said, it is now more common for authorities to deploy “covert forensics” by installing software that monitors what is being typed on a suspect’s computer, with a record automatically sent to police by email without the suspect’s knowledge. Covert surveillance is currently regulated under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) , with the power to conduct clandestine investigations granted internally by senior officers within each respective police force. In a speech given to human rights group Liberty in February , Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said he favoured introducing an “additional element of judicial oversight in keeping with our traditions of accountability” in order to “secure the confidence of right-thinking people”. The terms under which Ripa can be used to justify covert surveillance are broad, and include in the interests of public safety, national security and economic wellbeing of the UK. In 2010 there were more than 21,000 authorisations of covert surveillance by law enforcement agencies across the UK, according to the latest figures produced by the Office of Surveillance Commissioners. Such tactics are primarily used to detect serious organised crime. But police have also used the powers afforded to them under Ripa to unlawfully target political activists, placing undercover officers at the heart of protest groups to gather intelligence. Daniel Hamilton, director of pressure group Big Brother Watch , expressed concern over “expansion by stealth” of the police’s ability to conduct invasive surveillance, and called for a review of the police’s Ripa powers. “While covert operations play an important role in solving criminal investigations, these operations should be the exception, not the norm,” he said. “Expanding the use of wiretaps and the monitoring of internet connections risks dragging scores of innocent people into police investigations they should rightly play no part in. “The government has pledged to limit the ease by which local councils can utilise Ripa powers. A similar review of police Ripa powers should take place.”A spokesman for the East Midlands police collaboration programme said: “Due to the sensitive operational nature of the work that the unit will undertake, we have not sought to proactively publicise its establishment. “However, details of the proposal have been discussed in police authority meetings, which are open to the public, and in media interviews.” A spokesman for the South East Covert Operations Unit said that the forces concerned had been open about the formation of the new group – in press releases and documents published online – which would save money for taxpayers. “There is strong and clear governance of the unit and it is already successful in helping to tackle serious regional criminality,” he said. Police Surveillance Hi-tech crime Cloud computing Hacking Internet Computing Ryan Gallagher Rajeev Syal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Frank Schaeffer Explains Why Dominionists Are Driving Debt Ceiling Brinksmanship
July 25, 2011 No CommentAs Debt Ceiling Theatre begins an new week, we may well find this installment beginning with Asian markets crawling in the tank as further evidence of how far our treasonous right wing politicians are willing to go in order to serve their hedge fund managing Wall Street overlords. But as a prologue, we had John Boehner yet again prove his unseriousness by proposing a 2-tier solution with a “serious” face. Because he hasn’t already tried this before, don’t you know? Boehner proposed to Pelosi and Reid a plan to raise the debt ceiling through 2011, with a second raise in the beginning of 2012. Because somehow in his whiskey-addled brain, Boehner thinks Obama and the Democrats have somehow said they would be amenable to that? Opposite land is where Boehner is living. Or maybe not. As Frank Schaeffer explains , much of the brinksmanship is also being driven by right-wing fundamentalists. Theology is — by nature — not about reason but about faith. If God’s will is to be served then so be it if America is plunged into chaos! This debt ceiling fiasco is just another chapter in the “culture” wars. The extreme language of Evangelical/”pro-life” rebellion has now been repackaged in the debt ceiling showdown. It is the language of religion pitted against facts. And the anti-government charge is being led by people who are either true believers, thus unable to reason, or people catering to the true believers so that they can remain in the good books of the Tea Party, which is nothing more than the Evangelical far right repackaged and renamed. Well yes. In this regard he’s not telling us anything we don’t already know, except that I’m not sure I’d be so quick to wrap up the Tea Party as evangelicals only. It is an unholy alliance of evangelicals and agnostics whose religion is the Almighty Dollar. But he goes on, and here’s where it gets interesting: A Willingness To Destroy America In Order To Save It George and Colson and the others who wrote and then signed the “Manhattan Declaration” (like Kreeft before them) also called for fundamentalists to unite if need be for civil disobedience to stop the U.S. government from passing laws that did not comply with their religious “values” and/or to undermine those laws if they were enacted. Here’s the actual text of that section of the Manhattan Declaration : Going back to the earliest days of the church, Christians have refused to compromise their proclamation of the gospel. In Acts 4, Peter and John were ordered to stop preaching. Their answer was, “Judge for yourselves whether it is right in God’s sight to obey you rather than God. For we cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard.” Through the centuries, Christianity has taught that civil disobedience is not only permitted, but sometimes required. The rest of it, as you may know, is a structured list of the culture war issues: homosexuality, gay marriage, abortion, etc. But as Schaeffer points out, this particular section grants them (in their own minds) the moral authority to demand that the government be destroyed in order to save it from these terrible things. The debt ceiling is just their current lever, like the Affordable Care Act was, and like all of the ridiculous votes to defund Planned Parenthood were earlier this year. As I consider the victims in Norway who were assassinated by a gunman with views quite similar to these , I am rapidly concluding that this is an ungovernable nation with these insane, irresponsible, dogma-guided people pretending to lead. It could be that the markets will agree with that, too, in which case we may all find ourselves locked in the curse of interesting times .
Continue reading …Networks Trumpet News of ‘Christian’ Killer, But Balked Over Labeling Muslim Violence
July 25, 2011 No Comment
The three major networks trumpeted the news this weekend that the man behind a mass shooting spree in Norway is also a Christian, highlighting the fact in eight different programs from Saturday through Monday. The July 25 New York Times used page one to declare, ” As Horrors Emerge, Norway Charges Christian Extremist. ” Yet, these same journalistic outlets were far more reticent to identify the religion of past Islamic killers. On Saturday's Good morning America, Miguel Marquez trumpeted, ” Police have identified the shooter as a 32-year-old Norwegian and Christian fundamentalist. ” He made sure to note Anders Breivik's “right-wing” and “anti-Muslim” views. On Saturday's World News, Pierre Thomas informed, “His ideology? Religious conservative.” A screen shot of Breivik's Facebook page read “Christian.” Martin Fletcher on Saturday's Today freely related that the website illuminated the fact that “he's conservative…he's Christian.” Breivik has been charged with going on a shooting rampage in Oslo, Norway. The death toll is currently in the mid-70s. There are a number of examples, however, where journalists weren't quite so interested in a killer's religion. In June of 2011, when Muslim Yonathan Melaku was caught in Arlington Cemetery with suspicious material and a notebook praising the Taliban, the networks him simply as “the suspect,” “a 22-year old Ethiopian American” and a “lone wolf.” On November 05, 2009 , CBS' Evening News and NBC's Nightly News both failed to identify Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan as a member of Islam. The morning shows on November 6 did note Hasan's faith, but on GMA, then-host Diane Sawyer worried, “We heard Martha Raddatz say last night that the wife of a soldier said ‘I wish his name had been Smith,’ so no one would have a reflexive question about [a religious motive].” This is an often repeated theme in the wake of extremist Islamic violence. Appearing on the November 2, 2010 Stephanie Miller radio show to talk about the Times Square bombing, MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer fretted, “I get frustrated…There was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country.” Thus far, network hosts have not worried about how Breivik's Christianity could negatively impact members of that religion. The networks, on June 2, 2009 , spiked the information that it was a Muslim convert who shot to Army privates outside a Little Rock Arkansas recruiting office. In total, Breivik's Christianity was mentioned on Saturday's Good Morning America and World News, as well as the Saturday, Sunday and Monday editions of Today. It was also highlighted on Saturday's Nightly News and that day's Early Show on CBS, as well as Monday's episode. A sampling of some of the Christian labeling, which aired from Saturday, July 23 through Monday July 25, can be found below: GMA 07/23/11 7:04 MIGUEL MARZUEZ: Police have identified the shooter as a 32-year-old Norwegian and Christian fundamentalist. State television has identified him as
Continue reading …
Mark Thompson also says cuts will not include dropping BBC Parliament from Freeview, but will not rule out service closures The BBC director general, Mark Thompson, has ruled out the merger of local radio with BBC Radio 5 Live or dropping the BBC Parliament channel from Freeview as part of plans to find 20% of cost savings. Thompson said he would not be closing any local radio stations or merging regional TV news operations in England, but declined to rule out service closures entirely. “We haven’t ruled out service closures yet but the work so far suggests there’s a smarter way of making savings without taking entire services away from the public … because every single service is strongly valued by its audience,” he added. The director general made the comments in an email to staff updating them on the progress of his “Delivering Quality First” (DQF) initiative to cut costs by 20% as a result of last year’s flat licence fee settlement. A merger between local radio and Radio 5 Live was one of the proposals to come out of DQF, but it has now been ruled out, as was the withdrawal of the BBC Parliament channel. “I’d also like to reassure you about some of the things that we won’t be proposing, but about which there has been speculation,” said Thompson. “We won’t be closing any local radio stations or television regions. There will be no full or partial merger of local radio and Radio 5 Live. We will not be removing BBC Parliament from Freeview. And as you heard from the chairman earlier this month, we will not be privatising BBC Worldwide. Thompson said job losses would be “relatively higher in non-content areas and among senior managers”. He added that his staff email followed what he called a “positive meeting” with the BBC Trust last week, with final proposals due to be presented by management in September. Thompson said the BBC would focus its investment on five editorial priorities: the best journalism in the world; inspiring knowledge, music and culture; ambitious UK drama and comedy; outstanding children’s content; and events that bring communities and the nation together. Of the 20% savings, 10% will come from productivity, 8% from “scope reductions” and 2% from current efficiency programmes and from increased commercial revenue. “Those scope changes have to mean real cuts in activity rather than efficiencies by another name, otherwise there’s a risk that quality will suffer,” Thompson said. “We haven’t ruled out service closures yet but the work so far suggests there’s a smarter way of making savings without taking entire services away from the public.
Continue reading …
Officials say Darioush Rezaeinejad was post-graduate electrical engineering student in Tehran Iran has denied claims that an academic shot dead during the weekend was involved in the country’s nuclear programme. Iranian media initially described Darioush Rezaeinejad, who was fired on by gunmen riding on motorcycles in east Tehran on Saturday, as a “nuclear scientist” and an academic associated with Iran’s atomic activities, but officials have since said he was a postgraduate electrical engineering student. Speaking to reporters after a cabinet meeting on Monday, Iran’s intelligence minister, Heydar Moslehi, was quoted by the semi-official Isna news agency as saying: “The assassinated student was not involved in nuclear projects and [his murder] was not linked to [Iran's] nuclear programme.” Rezaeinejad, 35, was a masters student at Tehran’s Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology and was waiting to defend his thesis, officials said. In the aftermath of his death, Iranian news agencies reported different and often contradictory accounts about Rezaeinejad’s background. Isna said he had links with Iran’s nuclear agency and Fars, an agency under the control of the Revolutionary Guards, said he was associated with the country’s defence ministry. The similarity between Rezaeinejad’s assassination and that of other Iranian academics during the past two years also led news agencies to associate him with the country’s nuclear activities. Last November, Majid Shahriari, a nuclear scientist, was killed and Fereidoon Abbasi Davani, Iran’s current nuclear chief, survived assassination in co-ordinated attacks carried out by killers who rode up on motorcycles and stuck bombs to their car windows as they left their homes in Tehran. In January 2010, another academic, Masoud Ali Mohammadi was killed in a similar attack in what is now being seen by some analysts as a covert war against Iran’s nuclear activities. Despite several officials who saw a foreign hand in the assassination of Rezaeinejad, Moslehi said on Monday that no evidence was available to link the killing with foreign services. “We have not seen any sign which could demonstrate that the attack had been carried out by foreign services,” the intelligence minister said, according to Isna. “We are investigating what has happened, we haven’t found anything and there are yet some dark and vague issues surrounding the assassination.” According to Iranian media, no arrests have taken place in connection with the shooting. The speaker of the Iranian parliament, Ali Larijani, had accused the US and Israel of being behind the assassination. “[Saturday's] US-Zionist terrorist act that targeted one of the elites of Iran is another example which shows the hostility of US towards Iran,” the state news agency quoted Larijani as saying. Other officials including the Tehran governor, Morteza Tamaddon, have also blamed the US and Israel for the attack. “Undoubtedly, this was an American-Israeli project against our intellectuals and thinkers with the aim of discouraging the Iranian nation from continuing the path it has taken,” he was quoted as saying by Abna news agency at Rezaeinejad’s funeral. A month ago, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards, Mohammad Ali Jafari, said his organisation had received information that “the enemies of the Islamic regime” were plotting more assassinations. Apart from the assassination of its scientists, Iran’s nuclear programme has also suffered from a computer worm, Stuxnet, which was designed to sabotage the country’s nuclear facilities. Iran Nuclear power Nuclear weapons Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Doctor who accidentally killed David Gray on only UK shift as locum GP fails to stop attempts to get him banned in Germany A German doctor who accidentally killed a patient on his only UK shift as a locum GP on out-of-hours duty has failed in the latest round of his legal battle to silence the patient’s sons. A Munich appeal court has dismissed continuing attempts by Daniel Ubani to stop Rory and Stuart Gray trying to get him banned in his own country and questioning EU judicial and medical rules. Ubani killed their father, David Gray, at his Cambridgeshire home with a tenfold overdose of the painkiller diamorphine in February 2008, an act that a coroner ruled unlawful killing and led to him being barred by the General Medical Council from working in Britain. Ubani, whose main work is as a cosmetic surgeon, wanted to stop the brothers continuing to demand the changes to extradition arrangements and to EU rules over the checking of medical qualifications and competence. The doctor was given a suspended prison sentence in Germany and ordered to pay €5,000 in legal costs for killing Gray by negligence just as British authorities were seeking to pursue a possible manslaughter charge. He claimed the brothers were making false statements about him. Last summer the Grays interrupted Ubani’s appearance at a medical conference in Germany to publicise the case. He retaliated by trying to stop them criticising him anywhere in the EU or approaching within 550 metres of him. A court in Kempten, southern Germany, ruled against him and said the brothers could call him a charlatan or killer, but not an animal. Ubani’s appeal on the finding was dismissed this month. The judge said the appeal had “no chance of success” and rejected it because “the matter is of no fundamental importance”. He faces court costs of €15,000 for the initial case and €14,000 for the appeal, in addition to the brothers’ legal costs and expenses. Ubani was recently fined €7,000 by medical authorities over Gray’s death for breaking his country’s code of conduct for doctors, although he is still free to practise there. Rory Gray, a satellite engineer in Germany, said: “Considering he had flown to the UK at the age of 65 to do a weekend shift for £45 pounds an hour, out of which he had to pay his own flights, travel and accommodation, I would imagine this would be quite a significant financial burden.” Doctors Health Germany Europe James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
People to be asked how content they feel in attempt to measure impact of policies on nation’s wellbeing Datablog: how do you measure happiness? The government will ask people how happy they are in order to measure the nation’s wellbeing for the first time, the chief statistician has revealed. Jill Mathieson, head of the Office for National Statistics, said that since April the Integrated Household Survey (IHS) had asked respondents to rank between one and 10 “how satisfied are you with your life nowadays, how happy did you feel yesterday, how anxious did you feel yesterday and to what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile?”. The results of the survey of 200,000 people will be published next July. Using these and a set of “objective” measurements, such as life expectancy and wealth, the government will devise a scheme to allow civil servants to assess the impact future policies will have on the wellbeing of the population. Mathieson said it was clear that how well-off people feel depends on things, such as their health or whether they have a job, that GDP does not capture. After 10 months of public consultation, she said, the ONS had “highlighted that the things that matter the most are our health, relationships, work and the environment. These are also themes that the majority of respondents agree should be reflected in a measure of national wellbeing, with the addition of education and training.” She argued that it was time to concentrate on household incomes, consumption and wealth rather than just total production. Launching the findings of the wellbeing debate, Sir Gus O’Donnell, the cabinet secretary, said he would be publishing a discussion paper on how to revise the civil service “green book”, which issues guidance to mandarins on how ministerial proposals should be appraised before public funds are committed. He wanted a “social cost/benefit analysis” to be offered by civil servants in the future. “[It's] to give people an idea on how to submit to ministers … how can they frame it in the right way.” The question is how to measure well-being. One important facet is how to assess people’s “quality of life”. O’Donnell said he had been surprised by the beneficial effect of “altruism” on people giving their time to volunteer and was looking at releasing civil servants to help in charities on a pro bono basis. David Cameron – who first floated the idea of a “happiness index” in 2005 when he was running for the leadership of the Conservative party – last November asked the ONS how best to capture information that would help Britain re-evaluate its priorities. Since then government policies have tried to focus on wellbeing as a desirable outcome, said O’Donnell. He cited how improving the mental health of the long-term unemployed could help them find work; how protecting parks and green spaces raised people’s wellbeing; and how reducing pressure on families would help increase children’s happiness. In 2007 Unicef placed UK at the bottom of a league table looking at subjective indicators of children’s wellbeing, resulting in a big push by the government to improve the happiness of the young. Although the country’s standing improved by 2010 it remained below those of other wealthy nations. The ONS regularly produces measures of income inequality but said it had only just begun “to look at inequality between generations though its developmental work on the generational accounting approach to public finances in the UK”. Andrew Oswald, professor of economics at the University of Warwick, said recent research from Californian academics had confirmed that when people found out they were being paid “below average” for their work, they “instantly registered a lower job satisfaction and look for jobs elsewhere. There’s nothing intrinsically left or rightwing about wellbeing. But it is important for the government to measure it,” said Oswald. Health Civil service Children Poverty Social trends Unemployment Volunteering Randeep Ramesh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …