Doctors arrested or prevented from working amid martial law in tiny Gulf state Bahrain’s two main hospitals remain surrounded by masked soldiers despite demands from America that the kingdom must ease its violent crackdown on demonstrators and the medical workers treating them. Soldiers also continue to patrol all main roads in the capital Manama and have cordoned off access to the former hub of the protest movement, Pearl Roundabout, which was destroyed under government orders on Friday , denying the restive demonstrators a focal point. The tiny Gulf state has the feel of a nation under siege as it approaches a second week of martial law imposed for three months by its besieged rulers. In addition to the troop presence, neighbourhoods remain largely empty; large, glitzy shopping malls have been virtually abandoned and helicopters regularly buzz over the debris-strewn scenes of recent street clashes. Hospitals, particularly the Salmaniya medical clinic near the centre of town, have received extra attention, largely because of the significance they have taken on since the protests began in January. As well as being used to treat hundreds of casualties, nearly all of them unarmed protesters, the hospitals served as rallying points for protesters, who took refuge from riot police in the relative safety of their grounds. Salmaniya was one of several hospitals attacked by security forces during the week. Their entrances clearly show scuffs from rubber bullets and teargas cannisters, as well as sound grenades were found well inside hospital grounds. Images of thousands of protesters, joined by doctors with bullhorns and outraged ambulance drivers, lionised the anti-government movement and contributed greatly to the regime’s public relations woes outside Bahrain. Several doctors have been arrested, among them leading surgeon, Ali al-Ikri, who has been accused of having contact with foreign agents. Others claim to have been intimidated by security forces and prevented from leaving their homes. “I live in a neighbourhood surrounded by colonels and senior officers,” said one doctor, who did not want to give her name. “If I go out I will be followed. There is a real risk to my safety and those of my colleagues. I have been prevented from returning to work. When I left the hospital, it was in utter chaos.” Kuwait is to send a medical team of 40 specialists to be deployed inside the hospitals as the government looks for new ways to manage the vehement anti-regime movement. “This is about us being sidelined and them getting in people who will stay on message,” said another doctor. “I know for a fact that the wards will be tidied up and some of the patients moved. The Kuwaitis will report back in good faith that all is in order and that will be the official narrative.” The US state department demanded on Friday that attacks on hospitals stop. “We call on security forces to cease violence, particularly on medical facilities and personnel,” it said. The US ecretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said the solution to the country’s crisis could only come through political dialogue. “We have made clear that security alone cannot resolve the challenges facing Bahrain,” Clinton told reporters in Paris. “Violence is not the answer; a political process is.” In the face of sustained international criticism, the strategy of the ruling dynasty has been to make Bahrain’s crisis a regional problem, by inviting Gulf forces into the kingdom. Hundreds of troops from the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council alliance were dispatched to Bahrain last week. Qatar said it had deployed troops and Kuwait has sent navy ships to patrol waters near Bahrain, where a maritime curfew has been ordered from 6pm-6am. However, Saudi Arabia continues to take a regional lead in the crisis, insisting on a hard line against the predominantly Shi’ite Muslim protesters who have defied the authority of the Riyadh-backed Sunni dynasty for two deeply destabilising months. Regional repercussions continue, though, with new demonstrations in iraq on Saturday against the Saudi role and strident criticism from Shi’ite Islamic clerics, which have sharply raised the sectarian stakes in Bahrain, a majority Shia Muslim state. At least 70% of Bahrainis are Shias. The establishment, however, is almost exclusively Sunni. The Shias have long complained that the status quo discriminates against them, denying them opportunities and access to decision-making. “We are not waging war,” said Bahrain’s foreign minister, Sheikh Khalid bin-Ahmed al-Khalifa. “We are restoring law and order. It is a very volatile situation and in volatile situations you expect violence to happen.” A fourth Bahraini protester died on Saturday from wounds he sustained earlier in the week. Relatives of another victim, IT technician Ahmed Farhan, said they witnessed him being executed as he lay prostrate on a street in the suburb of Sitra. “They killed him in cold blood,” said Ali Hassan Ali, a physical education teacher. “I was standing near him when he was shot. He fell, they chased us away and shot him in the head at point blank rage with a bird shot gun.” The victim’s injuries were consistent with being shot in the head from close range. Bahrain Middle East Arab and Middle East protests Kuwait Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Naturally, The New York Times has no interest in finding a scandal in the liberal Governor of New York “shacking up” or “living in sin,” even though
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with The Professional Left, otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal . There’s still time to vote for Bluegal if you’d like to help her get a scholarship for Netroots Nation from Democracy for America. Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everybody. And good luck with the scholarship Fran. Related Links: 1. ” To The Chicago Abyss ” by Ray Bradbury. 2. Driftglass’s eulogy of David Broder . 3. Rare, recently-discovered color photographs of the great San Francisco earthquake. 4. The Moral Underground: How Americans Subvert an Unfair Economy. You can listen to the archives or make a donation if you’d like to help keep these going at http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/ .
Continue reading …Allow me to refresh his memory. Ed Schultz and a caller to his radio show Thursday got into a heated argument after she criticized him for suggesting last year that Democrats stay away from the polls on election day to express their anger with congressional Democrats for not extending unemployment benefits. Schultz not only denied what the caller said, he was unequivocal and emphatic about it. Here's how the exchange went ( audio ) — SCHULTZ: All right, let's see, let me get back to this headline here — “Obama's team seeks new ways to fire up his base.” Beverly in Chicago, you're on the Ed Schultz radio show. Respond to that, thank you. CALLER: Do you think what you did in the midterms was right, telling folks to stay home? SCHULTZ: I didn't say that and I'm not going to get into that discussion. That is absolute garbage. That is right-wing crap that's going around the Internet and I'm not even going to go down that road, but I'll give you a chance to finish your phone call. CALLER: Whether you did or didn't … SCHULTZ: No, I, no, no, no, no, no, no. That's not a question of whether I did or didn't. I did not. I gave my opinion. I did not tell people not to vote. Do not say that! That is not true. CALLER: OK, can I say something now? SCHULTZ: You can say something, as long as it's not accusatory. Don't you know I'm above criticism?! After that the call turned toxic, Schultz and the woman arguing for the next two minutes until Schultz reined in his anger and, to his credit, said he wanted to talk with the caller again after a commercial break. Later in the same hour, back on the phone with Beverly from Chicago, Schultz said this ( audio ) — Do I think the president, do I have opinions about his campaign? Absolutely. Do I have opinions about the way they're doing things? Absolutely. Does that mean that I'm against him as a president? Absolutely not. Not at all! And, you know, you have to clarify exactly what you're consuming, OK? Just like when you called in and said that I was telling people not to vote. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, I was telling the 99ers (Schultz's term for the long-term unemployed, those who had received jobless benefits for nearly two years), you know, asking them the question, where do you stand now in the midterms?
Continue reading …Tax changes to help low earners and scrapping a fuel duty increase will make headlines, but the spectre of a double dip recession means the chancellor will still warn of austerity Hundreds of thousands more low-earners will be lifted out of income tax altogether and motorists will be offered relief from soaring petrol prices under plans to be announced by the chancellor, George Osborne, in the budget this week. The pledge to raise the threshold at which income tax becomes payable will form the centrepiece of measures aimed at relieving hard-pressed low-income groups – and boosting growth – as spending cuts bite. With unrest in the Middle East driving up international oil prices, the chancellor will cancel a planned increase in fuel duty, which was due to come in from 1 April and would have added up to 5p to the price of a litre of petrol. Reversing the rise will cost the Treasury almost £2bn, but Osborne is also known to be considering the more radical step of a fuel “stabiliser”, which would placate motorists and hauliers by cushioning the blow of rising oil prices. Osborne said last night he would use the budget to help jobless young people find work, funded by money from the government’s £2.5bn levy on banks. Official figures released earlier this week showed 974,000 young people out of work in the three months to January, the highest figure since records began in 1992. “Britain has to start making things again,” he wrote in the News of the World . “So this week’s budget will be unashamedly pro-enterprise and pro-jobs. In particular need of support are our young people. Youth unemployment started rising even before the recession but then reached record levels. That’s why I’ll be using some of the money our new government has raised from taxing the banks to create the most apprenticeships this country has ever seen, and a big expansion of work-experience places.” The decision to announce an increase in the personal allowance is outlined in an article for the Observer by the Liberal Democrat chief secretary to the treasury, Danny Alexander. He presents it as helping those most in need, at the same time as taking painful steps to slash the deficit. Alexander says that the budget will set out “further real-terms progress towards our goal of taking anyone earning less than £10,000 out of tax altogether”. It is understood that the tax-free threshold will be raised to around £8,000, with the change likely to come into effect in April 2012. In his emergency budget last June, Osborne responded to Lib Dem pressure to assist low earners by raising the personal tax allowance from £6,475 to £7,475, handing about £200 to all basic rate taxpayers, and removing 880,000 people from the tax net altogether. The plan for another increase in the threshold received qualified support. Gavin Kelly, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, which represents low- to middle-income families, said it “would offer some welcome relief to many basic rate taxpayers, but would not offer much to the very lowest earners, who don’t pay tax, or middle-income families with children. For many working families, any gains from allowances are likely to be greatly outweighed by cuts to tax credits and the rise in VAT.” Matt Oakley, head of enterprise, growth and social policy at the centre-right thinktank Policy Exchange, said it would be unfortunate if help for low earners was paid for by widening the group paying top-rate tax. “Previous increases have been paid for by bringing more people into the 40% rate of income tax, which is not good for growth,” Oakley said. James Browne, senior research economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the measure was an inefficient way of helping the poorest households. “You’re giving a fixed cash amount to all basic rate taxpayers, so relatively little money is going to the people who you’re taking out of tax altogether,” he said, pointing out that more than 90% of the beneficiaries would be likely to earn more than £10,000 a year. “If you really wanted to target low-earners, perhaps you would be better off to increase the working tax credit.” While Osborne is keen to move the focus away from cuts, he will insist that he has no option but to press ahead with his austerity programme if the economy is to be restored to health. The 0.6% contraction in GDP in the final months of 2010 caused alarm at the Treasury and raised the spectre of a double-dip recession, for which Osborne would be likely to take the blame. On Wednesday, he will be forced to announce that the economy will grow more slowly than expected this year and next, prolonging the pain for households facing falling real incomes and rising taxes. Most economists expect the independent Office for Budget Responsibility to downgrade its forecasts for economic growth. Osborne was stung by accusations from outgoing CBI boss Richard Lambert that the government lacked a “growth strategy”. The chancellor will announce a plethora of reforms to fix what he has called Britain’s “debt-fuelled” economic model. Speaking at the Treasury last week, he said the budget would focus on skills, planning and green technology to resolve some of the long-standing problems in the economy. But in a speech to Labour’s Scottish conference, party leader Ed Miliband said the chancellor should instead take urgent action on the “cost of living crisis” facing people across the country, starting by cutting VAT on petrol. “In the interests of justice and prosperity, the government should pay for these measures not by cutting taxes for the banks but by imposing a tax on irresponsible bankers’ bonuses,” he said. “It’s time the people who caused this crisis pay their fair share in putting things right.” Friends of the Earth wants Osborne to deliver on the government’s promise to be the “greenest ever”. Executive director Andy Atkins said Osborne must make it cheaper and easier for people to reduce their reliance on oil, gas and coal.” Osborne will also promise a more detailed investigation into proposals to merge tax and national insurance. The idea was recommended in an Office for Tax Simplification report, commissioned by Osborne to come up with proposals to help small businesses. Breaking down the tax barriers and shattering the “contributory principle”, under which people qualify for certain benefits only when they have paid into the public coffers – could represent the most radical shakeup of the system since the foundation of the welfare state. Budget 2011 George Osborne Tax and spending Economic policy Recession Danny Alexander Toby Helm Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I’m almost never in favor of going to war, but at least against Libya there is a real lifesaving component involved, and at least this time it’s multilateral : A coalition of American and European forces bombed Libyan targets by air and sea Saturday in the first phase of a military campaign to drive Moammar Gadhafi from power. French warplanes fired the first shots in the broadest international military effort since the Iraq war, destroying government tanks and armored vehicles in the region of the rebels’ eastern stronghold, Benghazi. Hours later, British and U.S. warships and submarines launched more than 110 Tomahawk missiles against Gadhafi’s air defenses around the capital Tripoli and the western city of Misrata, which has been besieged by Gadhafi’s forces, Pentagon officials said. The aim of the operation, dubbed Odyssey Dawn, was to enforce a United Nations-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya and stop Gadhafi from attacking overwhelmed rebel forces in the east. “This is not an outcome the U.S. or any of our partners sought,” President Barack Obama said from Brazil, where he is starting a five-day visit to Latin America. “We cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy.” It doesn’t hurt that this mission will prevent certain slaughter of his own people by a madman/dictator. Libya is saying the airstrikes inflicted considerable damage: Our thoughts and prayers go out to our men and women serving in the mission.
Continue reading …enlarge Pondering the pink slips at Boeing on March 18th. Click here to view this media The Nixon years. No shortage of drama, not even during the first term. On March 18th 1971 news was greeted at Boeing with a sense of dread, as the House voted to kill the SST (Supersonic Transport) program . Nixon’s proposal of the Revenue Sharing Program with local governments met with tepid response. Debate was on over No-Fault Car insurance. Nixon renews his pledge to abolish the Office of Economic Opportunity from the Johnson Administration. Meanwhile, the Nixon administration opted to turn down Federal funding for school age inoculations triggering a spike in disease outbreaks by the end of 1970. The EPA refused to ban DDT and the weed killer 245T. It came as no surprise to anyone that low income families paid 1/2 of their annual income in taxes, while the rest paid roughly a third. The Vietnam War dragged on with the South Vietnamese Army scoring heavy losses and the Lt. Calley Mai Lai Massacre trial continued. It could always be worse. Here is an NBC Nightly News from March 18, 1971, complete with commercials.
Continue reading …For more than 25 years, Dr Abhay Bang has dedicated his life to reducing infant mortality in the poorest areas of India. But his dazzling results owe little to the orthodoxy of western medicine and everything to his team of neonatally trained rural women Dr Abhay Bang does not look like a
Continue reading …From Lady Gaga’s fantastical creations to Katy Perry’s tongue-in-cheek costumes – today’s female pop stars are in competition to top the charts for outrageous fashion. So what happened to elegant red-carpet styling? And how much more bizarre can their outfits get? Spring is a fertile time. Not just for the lambs and the budding trees, but for fashion and trends. The first months of each year bring the latest round of catwalk shows from New York, London, Milan and Paris, and the concurrent awards season sent the best dressed in film and music trotting up the red carpets to the Grammys, the Brits, the Baftas and the Oscars. Spring is an orgy of style. In the old days, if you wanted to look at the beautifully ridiculous, the conceptual or the just plain silly, the fashion shows were your best bet. Awards ceremonies, by contrast, used to be elegant oceans of pretty, colourful gowns by Valentino, Marchesa and Versace. They were so sedate that, in 2001, when Björk wore a swan dress by fashion designer Marjan Pejoski and laid six eggs on the red carpet at the Oscars, she was lampooned for years. In 2011, a
Continue reading …William and Kate’s big day means big business for the makers of wedding memorabilia, from china mugs and tea towels to novelty cakes and king-sized condoms. We go behind the scenes to meet our commemorative merchandisers – and Britain’s most avid collector The Kirkgate Business Centre in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, is not the kind of place you would automatically associate with the royal wedding. Situated off a busy main road, it consists of a series of looping dirt pathways, each one lined with vast, windowless warehouses advertising bathroom tiles or building supplies. Behind the metal-pronged gates, a
Continue reading …