Japanese nuclear power plant operator hopes to prevent explosive buildup of hydrogen gas Japan has begun pumping nitrogen gas into a crippled nuclear reactor, refocusing the fight on preventing an explosive buildup of hydrogen gas at Fukushima Daiichi power plant. Workers started injecting nitrogen into the containment vessel of reactor No 1 on Wednesday last night, after a morning breakthrough in stopping highly radioactive water leaking into the sea at another reactor in the six-reactor complex. “It is necessary to inject nitrogen gas into the containment vessel and eliminate the potential for a hydrogen explosion,” an official of plant operator Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) told a news briefing. The possibility of another hydrogen explosion like those that ripped through reactors 1 and 3 early in the crisis, spreading high levels of radiation into the air, was “extremely low” he said. But Tepco suspected that the outside casing of the reactor vessel was damaged, said the official. “Under these conditions, if we continue cooling the reactors with water, the hydrogen leaking from the reactor vessel to the containment vessel could accumulate and could reach a point where it could explode,” he added. Although engineers succeeded after days of desperate efforts to plug the leak at reactor No 2, they still need to pump 11.5m litres of contaminated water back into the ocean because they have run out of storage space at the facility. The water was used to cool overheated fuel rods. Nuclear experts said the damaged reactors were far from being under control almost a month after they were hit by a massive earthquake and tsunami on 11 March. The growing concerns of nearby South Korea and China about radioactive fallout from Japan were underscored when China’s health ministry reported trace amounts of radioactive iodine in spinach in three Chinese provinces. The two western neighbours of Japan have reportedly complained that they have not been fully informed about Tepco’s plans to release radioactive water into the Pacific. “We are instructing the trade and foreign ministries to work better together so that detailed explanations are supplied, especially to neighbouring countries,” chief cabinet secretary Yukio Edano told a news conference. Experts insisted the low-level radioactive water to be pumped into the ocean posed no health hazard to people. “The original amount of radioactivity is very low, and when you dilute this with a huge body of water, the final levels will be even lower than legal limits,” said Pradip Deb, senior lecturer in medical radiations at the school of medical sciences, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Japan disaster Japan Natural disasters and extreme weather Nuclear power guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Libyan leader condemns Nato action and says his opponents are al-Qaida members in three-page letter to US president Muammar Gaddafi has appealed directly to Barack Obama to halt what the Libyan leader called “an unjust war”. In a rambling three-page letter obtained by the Associated Press, Gaddafi implored Obama to stop the Nato-led air campaign, which he called an “unjust war against a small people of a developing country”, and wished the president luck in next year’s election. “You are a man who has enough courage to annul a wrong and mistaken action,” Gaddafi wrote in the letter, which was sent to the US state department and forwarded to the White House. “I am sure that you are able to shoulder the responsibility for that.” The letter continued: “To serving world peace … friendship between our peoples … and for the sake of economic, and security cooperation against terror, you are in a position to keep Nato off the Libyan affair for good.” The White House press secretary Jay Carney confirmed that a letter from Gaddafi had been received – and appeared to dismiss the Libyan’s appeal for a ceasefire. “The conditions the president laid out are clear,” Carney told reporters who were travelling with Obama to New York. Addressing Obama as “our son” and “excellency”, Gaddafi said his country had been hurt more “morally” than “physically” by the Nato campaign and that a democratic society could not be built through missiles and aircraft. He also repeated his claim that his foes, particularly those now in control of the city of Benghazi, are members of al-Qaida. Gaddafi said his country had already been unfairly subjected to US and international sanctions, and in 1986 to “a direct military armed aggression” ordered by Ronald Reagan, who called the leader the “Mad Dog of the Middle East”. Although he listed a litany of complaints, Gaddafi said he bore no ill will toward Obama. “We have been hurt more morally [than] physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,” he wrote. “Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We Endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.” The letter, dated 5 April 2011 in Tripoli, is signed “Mu’aumer Qaddaffi, Leader of the Revolution”. Muammar Gaddafi Libya Middle East Nato Arab and Middle East unrest United States Barack Obama Obama administration US politics guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Interviewed by Jemima Khan, deputy prime minister says ‘I’m a human being … not a punchbag’ Poor old Nick Clegg. The deputy prime minister has exposed his vulnerable side in an interview in which he says he regularly cries to music, his children wonder why students are being so hard on him, and the only time he played tennis with David Cameron he lost. “I’m a human being, I’m not a punchbag – I’ve got feelings,” Clegg tells Jemima Khan in a revealing interview in the latest edition of the New Statesman. “The curious thing is that the more you become a subject of admiration or loathing, the distance seems to open up between who you really are and the portrayals that people impose on you … I increasingly see these images of me, cardboard cutouts that get ever more outlandish. “One thing I’ve very quickly learned is that if you wake up every morning worrying about what’s in the press, you would go completely and utterly potty.” At home in the evenings, Clegg likes to read novels and he says that he cries regularly to music, although this is not, strictly speaking, breaking news: Clegg did make similar remarks in an interview with Radio 4 last year. Talking about his family, he tells Khan: “What I am doing in my work impacts on them emotionally, because my nine-year-old is starting to sense things and I’m having to explain things. Like he asks: ‘Why are the students angry with you, Papa?’” He adds that members of the public often express support but whisper their congratulations, “as if it’s a guilty secret saying anything nice about Nick Clegg”. Clegg insists that his relationship with David Cameron – whom he calls “Dave” – is not particularly close. “We don’t regard each other as mates and actually I don’t think it would be a particularly healthy thing if we tried to become personal mates.” When Khan mentions talk that the two men play tennis together, Clegg squirms. “No, no – well, er, I think we’ve played one game of tennis. Of course we meet from time to time but it’s always basically to talk about what we’re doing in government.” Who won? “Ah no, that’s a state secret,” Clegg jokes. (Cameron won, Khan reveals.) Khan also asks Clegg what he thinks about News International chief executive, Rebekah Brooks, being a regular guest at David Camerons’ dinner parties. “I don’t know anything about Oxfordshire dinner parties. I’m assuming that they weren’t sitting there talking about News International issues,” says Clegg. “Look, you’re putting me in a very awkward spot. If you’ve got an issue with it, speak to Dave. I don’t hang out in Oxfordshire at dinner parties. It’s not my world. It’s never going to be my world.” Clegg also signals a changed identity for the Lib Dems. He said: “I don’t even pretend we can occupy the Lib Dem holier-than-thou, hands-entirely-clean-and-entirely-empty-type stance,” Clegg says. “No, we are getting our hands dirty, and inevitably and totally understandably we are being accused of being just like any other politicians.” On the manifesto pledge not to increase tuition fees, he insists that it was not one of his main manifesto priorities: “I didn’t even spend that much time campaigning on tuition fees.” Clegg has had trouble with interviews in magazines before. In 2008 he told Piers Morgan in GQ that he had slept with “no more than 30″ women, a remark that sparked a thousand dyspeptic headlines. Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Laurent Gbagbo accuses France of assassination attempt amid fresh fighting and desperation on the streets of Abidjan Ivory Coast’s incumbent leader caught France and the rest of the world by surprise when he refused to surrender, accused Nicolas Sarkozy of an assassination plot, and defiantly held out as rebels attempted to storm his underground bunker. French ministers had confidently predicted that Laurent Gbagbo could cede power within hours, ending the west African country’s four-month crisis. A TV station run by his rival, Alassane Ouattara, played clips from Downfall, a German film about the final days of Adolf Hitler in his bunker in Berlin. But France, the former colonial power, was forced to admit that negotiations for Gbagbo’s surrender had collapsed on Wednesday. Troops loyal to Ouattara launched a ferocious assault on his presidential residence but met with unexpectedly stiff resistance. Gbagbo told French TV channel LCI that his army had only called for a ceasefire, not surrender. “I’m not a kamikaze,” he said by phone. “I love life. My voice is not the voice of a martyr, no, no, no, I’m not looking for death. It’s not my aim to die. “For peace to return to Ivory Coast, I and Ouattara, the two of us have to talk.” Later he told a French radio station: “I am in the residence, the residence of president of the republic. When it rains, can’t one take shelter inside one’s house? We are not at the negotiating stage. And my departure from where? To go where?” Gbagbo’s characteristic play for time dashed hopes that the conflict, which is causing a humanitarian crisis, would be over on Tuesday. Instead there was still a frantic search for food and water in Abidjan and a stench of corpses in the streets. “The fighting is terrible here, the explosions are so heavy my building is shaking,” Alfred Kouassi, who lives near Gbagbo’s residence in the commercial capital, told Reuters. “We can hear automatic gunfire and the thud of heavy weapons. There’s shooting all over the place. Cars are speeding in all directions and so are the fighters.” The French foreign minister, Alain Juppé, said fighting resumed after talks led by the UN and France to secure Gbagbo’s departure failed. “The negotiations which were carried out for hours yesterday between the entourage of Laurent Gbagbo and Ivorian authorities have failed because of Gbagbo’s intransigence,” Juppé told parliament in Paris, adding that “words have given way to weapons”. Gbagbo, who has ruled Ivory Coast since 2000, resisted pressure to sign a document renouncing his claim to power. His spokesman, Ahoua Don Mello, said: “If Gbagbo has refused to sign the documents they [the UN and France] presented to him yesterday, it is because they proposed something that had no legal and judicial basis.” France’s intervention in support of extraordinary UN air strikes on Gbagbo’s arsenal on Monday night infuriated the incumbent leader, who blames Paris for supporting the north of the country in a 2002-03 civil war. Gbagbo’s spokesman in Paris, Toussaint Alain, told Reuters: “We accuse France of seeking to assassinate President Gbagbo. President Sarkozy is organising the assassination of President Gbagbo. “France will be held responsible for the death of President Gbagbo, his wife and family members and all those who are inside the residence, which is being bombarded by the French army.” Witnesses reported seeing French tanks in the streets of Abidjan, but while the French military confirmed that fighting was under way around Gbagbo’s residence, it denied its troops were involved. A spokesman for Ouattara, the internationally recognised winner of last November’s election, said his fighters were storming Gbagbo’s residence. They had reached the gates of the presidential compound only to see heavy weapons ranged against them, he added, so the operation would take time. Ouattara’s forces have been ordered not to kill Gbagbo, said another spokesman, Patrick Achi. But residents said militias close to Gbagbo and his presidential guard were putting up a stiff resistance, even as most soldiers from the regular army had heeded a call to lay down their arms. Despite the fighting, desperate civilians in the north of the city ventured outside to hunt for water and food. The streets were generally deserted save for these lone scavengers, many of whom walked with their hands in the air to show they were noncombatants. “We haven’t slept, we haven’t eaten, we’ve had nothing to drink,” said Mariam, 17, balancing a plastic container of water on her head and wearing a white T-shirt with the words “Obama Girl” emblazoned in black. “We are all going to die. Even the water we do get is dirty.” Other residents told Reuters they had already walked 10 miles in their quest for drinking water. No one wanted to be out on the streets after a midday curfew imposed by Ouattara for fear of being taken for a pro-Gbagbo fighter. Even in the outskirts of Yopougon, one of Gbagbo’s strongest inner-city bastions, there were demands for him to step down – perhaps not surprising given the nearby presence of patrolling Ouattara troops who seized this neighbourhood on Monday. Ibrahim Cisse, 29, said: “We are just waiting for him to go. It’s Alassane who we are banking on now.” Several other people said pro-Ouattara soldiers had behaved well towards the local population. But they complained that water and electricity supplies went down at the same time as their main assault on Monday and have not been restored. Rubbish was piling up in mounds by the roadside and decaying corpses identified by locals as pro-Gbagbo militiamen remain uncollected. “Tell the people the smell is going everywhere,” 21-year-old Lassane Kone told Reuters. Cash machines are empty, shops are shut and supplies are running out. Public services are paralysed, with ambulances unable to travel in case they are fired on. Those in need of medical attention have nowhere to turn. A war economy has sprung up rapidly. Mariam said the price of atieke – the ground manioc which is one of the staples of the Abidjan diet – has tripled in the space of a few days. At a Ouattara base camp nearby, groups of women circulated between soldiers selling packets of atieke and little sachets of frozen fruit juices. “We are selling a bit so we can eat,” said one vendor. Many of Ivory Coast’s children have been stripped of their innocence. “We heard gunfire, Kalashnikovs, cannons, all that,” said one 11-year-old, interviewed by Save the Children. “It makes me afraid. It makes me feel sad to see all people flee, people displaced by the war, all that, it makes me sad … they were shooting all the time, morning, midday, evening … we will live with this. It hurts me.” The child, who was not named by the charity, added: “Here we eat but we are not full, we eat little. I would like Abidjan to calm down so that we can return home. I want to go back to school. “We need peace in the country. We need a good president too.” Last year’s long-delayed election in the world’s top cocoa producing nation was meant to draw a line under the civil war, but Gbagbo’s refusal to cede power has plunged the country into violence that has killed more than 1,500 people. The international criminal court prosecutor said on Tuesday he was in talks with west African states about referring alleged atrocities in the Ivory Coast to the court after a reported massacre in the west of the country. Ivory Coast Laurent Gbagbo Alassane Ouattara France David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Credit: The Scooter Motorized Scooter Many Tea Party seniors came out and voted for Republicans in the mid term elections hoping for a John Birch-like solution to our economic problems. It’s a little tough Goin’ Galt at that age, but what they got as Dean Baker points out is an overhaul plan that destroys their sainted Medicare plan and puts the burden of the health care completely on their own income according to the CBO: Ryan Proposes Medicare Plan Under Which Seniors Would Pay Most of Their Income for Health Care That is what headlines would look like if the United States had an independent press. After all, this is one of the main take aways of the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) analysis of the plan proposed by Representative Paul Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House Budget Committee. Representative Ryan would replace the current Medicare program with a voucher for people who turn age 65 in 2022 and later. This voucher would be worth $8,000 in for someone turning age 65 in that year. It would rise in step with with the consumer price index and also as people age. (Health care expenses are higher for people age 75 than age 65.) According to the CBO analysis the benefit would cover 32 percent of the cost of a health insurance package equivalent to the current Medicare benefit (Figure 1). This means that the beneficiary would pay 68 percent of the cost of this package. Using the CBO assumption of 2.5 percent annual inflation, the voucher would have grown to $9,750 by 2030. This means that a Medicare type plan for someone age 65 would be $30,460 under Representative Ryan’s plan, leaving seniors with a bill of $20,700. (This does not count various out of pocket medical expenditures not covered by Medicare.) — Furthermore, the portion of income going to health care costs will increase through time according to the CBO analysis. This is due both to aging of individuals and to increasing health care costs through time. As noted insurance for older beneficiaries will cost more than insurance for younger beneficiaries, but Representative Ryan’s voucher would still only pay the same amount for their care. This means that if the average 80-year-old cost twice as much to insure as the average 65-year-old, then the premium that would come out of a seniors’ pocket would be twice as large. This implies that if the program had been in effect for 15 years in 2030 then the average senior would be paying $41,400 for a Medicare equivalent insurance package in 2030, 25 percent more than the medium earner’s benefit in that year.. .read on I doubt any of Tea Party seniors would have signed up for this if they knew what Tea Party Conservatives were up to and what was actually in Ryan’s plan. I mean, as Matt Taibbi told us, seniors probably wouldn’t be able to afford the medical hardware they are accustomed to or drive around in their medicare paid for motorized wheel chairs any longer either: Scanning the thousands of hopped-up faces in the crowd, I am immediately struck by two things. One is that there isn’t a single black person here. The other is the truly awesome quantity of medical hardware: Seemingly every third person in the place is sucking oxygen from a tank or propping their giant atrophied glutes on motorized wheelchair-scooters. As Palin launches into her Ronald Reagan impression — “Government’s not the solution! Government’s the problem!” — the person sitting next to me leans over and explains . “The scooters are because of Medicare,” he whispers helpfully. “They have these commercials down here: ‘You won’t even have to pay for your scooter! Medicare will pay!’ Practically everyone in Kentucky has one.” A hall full of elderly white people in Medicare-paid scooters, railing against government spending and imagining themselves revolutionaries as they cheer on the vice-presidential puppet hand-picked by the GOP establishment. If there exists a better snapshot of everything the Tea Party represents, I can’t imagine it.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Watch Stu Varney get all conspiratorial with Megyn Kelly over the early retirement health care reinsurance provisions in the Affordable Care Act and laugh. In classic Varney-esque fashion, he tries to paint it as some secret government subsidy for unions and other left-wing organizations, completely ignoring the fact that some of his own conservative heroes have availed themselves of it much because — wait for it — it’s a reinsurance provision, easing some of the burdensome costs for corporations who maintain health insurance on early retirees between age 55 and 65. Here’s an easily accessible fact sheet published by the White House which would have helped Stu not to look like a raving idiot on TV yesterday morning. Even the Republico Politico did a better job of it than Megyn and Stu, and he surely could’ve put a call into Koch Industries. They were approved for the program last year so they can save a few extra bucks at taxpayer expense, too. Horrors. Obamacare doing something good for Koch Industries. Perish the thought. The ERRP program has provided more than 1,300 employers with nearly $1.8 billion in reimbursements to help ensure access to health benefits for early retirees, according to the CMS memo. If Stu can’t be bothered to check any facts before he spews, why should we trust anything he reports on business?
Continue reading …Vested interests cause both our financial system and the nuclear industry to compulsively underestimate risk The consequences of the Japanese earthquake – especially the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima nuclear power plant – resonate grimly for observers of the American financial crash that precipitated the Great Recession. Both events provide stark lessons about risks, and about how badly markets and societies can manage them. Of course, in one sense, there is no comparison between the tragedy of the earthquake – which has left more than 25,000 people dead or missing – and the financial crisis, to which no such acute physical suffering can be attributed. But when it comes to the nuclear meltdown at Fukushima, there is a common theme in the two events. Experts in both the nuclear and finance industries assured us that new technology had all but eliminated the risk of catastrophe. Events proved them wrong: not only did the risks exist, but their consequences were so enormous that they easily erased all the supposed benefits of the systems that industry leaders promoted. Before the Great Recession, America’s economic gurus – from the head of the Federal Reserve to the titans of finance – boasted that we had learned to master risk. “Innovative” financial instruments such as derivatives and credit default swaps enabled the distribution of risk throughout the economy. We now know that they deluded not only the rest of society, but even themselves. These wizards of finance, it turned out, didn’t understand the intricacies of risk, let alone the dangers posed by “fat-tail distributions” – a statistical term for rare events with huge consequences, sometimes called “black swans” . Events that were supposed to happen once in a century – or even once in the lifetime of the universe – seemed to happen every 10 years. Worse, not only was the frequency of these events vastly underestimated; so was the astronomical damage they would cause – something like the meltdowns that keep dogging the nuclear industry. Research in economics and psychology helps us understand why we do such a bad job in managing these risks. We have little empirical basis for judging rare events, so it is difficult to arrive at good estimates. In such circumstances, more than wishful thinking can come into play: we might have few incentives to think hard at all. On the contrary, when others bear the costs of mistakes, the incentives favour self-delusion. A system that socialises losses and privatises gains is doomed to mismanage risk. Indeed, the entire financial sector was rife with agency problems and externalities. Ratings agencies had incentives to give good ratings to the high-risk securities produced by the investment banks that were paying them. Mortgage originators bore no consequences for their irresponsibility, and even those who engaged in predatory lending or created and marketed securities that were designed to lose did so in ways that insulated them from civil and criminal prosecution. This brings us to the next question: are there other “black swan” events waiting to happen? Unfortunately, some of the really big risks that we face today are most likely not even rare events. The good news is that such risks can be controlled at little or no cost. The bad news is that doing so faces strong political opposition – for there are people who profit from the status quo. We have seen two of the big risks in recent years, but have done little to bring them under control. By some accounts, how the last crisis was managed may have increased the risk of a future financial meltdown. Too-big-to-fail banks, and the markets in which they participate, now know that they can expect to be bailed out if they get into trouble. As a result of this moral hazard, these banks can borrow on favourable terms, giving them a competitive advantage based not on superior performance, but on political strength. While some of the excesses in risk-taking have been curbed, predatory lending and unregulated trading in obscure, over-the-counter derivatives continue. Incentive structures that encourage excess risk-taking remain virtually unchanged. So, too, while Germany has shut down its older nuclear reactors, in the US and elsewhere, even plants that have the same flawed design as Fukushima continue to operate. The nuclear industry’s very existence is dependent on hidden public subsidies – costs borne by society in the event of nuclear disaster, as well as the costs of the still-unmanaged disposal of nuclear waste. So much for unfettered capitalism! For the planet, there is one more risk, which, like the other two, is almost a certainty: global warming and climate change. If there were other planets to which we could move at low cost in the event of the almost certain outcome predicted by scientists, one could argue that this is a risk worth taking. But there aren’t, so it isn’t. The costs of reducing emissions pale in comparison to the possible risks the world faces. And that is true even if we rule out the nuclear option (the costs of which were always underestimated). To be sure, coal and oil companies would suffer, and big polluting countries – like the US – would obviously pay a higher price than those with a less profligate lifestyle. In the end, those gambling in Las Vegas lose more than they gain. As a society, we are gambling – with our big banks, with our nuclear power facilities, with our planet. As in Las Vegas, the lucky few – the bankers that put our economy at risk and the owners of energy companies that put our planet at risk – may walk off with a mint. But on average and almost certainly , we as a society, like all gamblers, will lose. That, unfortunately, is a lesson of Japan’s disaster that we continue to ignore at our peril. © Project Syndicate 2011 Japan Nuclear power Nuclear waste Financial crisis Banking Regulators Global recession Climate change Natural disasters and extreme weather Pollution Global economy Joseph Stiglitz guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Four-part ITV drama, scripted by Julian Fellowes, will be screened in 2012 to coincide with centenary of disaster Linus Roache and Geraldine Somerville are to head the cast of Julian Fellowes’s dramatisation of the Titanic story. Fellowes, creator of Downton Abbey, is scripting a series to be screened by ITV next year, coinciding with the 100th anniversary of the “unsinkable” ship’s disastrous maiden voyage. Roache, who has appeared in US series Law & Order and films such as Batman Begins, recently appeared in Coronation Street alongside his father William Roache (Ken Barlow). Somerville is known for her role in the Harry Potter films , playing the young wizard’s mother Lily, as well as appearing in BBC1′s Survivors. The cast for the four-part series also includes Celia Imrie, Toby Jones and Perdita Weeks. It begins filming in Hungary later this month, made by Bafta-winning producer Nigel Stafford Clark, whose successes have included Bleak House and Warriors. Television industry The Titanic Drama Television ITV guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Haddock flakes keep their shape and make the perfect partner for peppery watercress When we talk about comfort food, fishcakes are always mentioned. Tasty lumps of potato and fish, gently fried – what’s not to like? Salmon is the classic filling, but haddock works just as well. It has a juicy texture and the dense flakes don’t get too mushy when bound with other ingredients. Haddock comes into season at the beginning of May; if you can’t find it in your local fishmonger yet buy it frozen, or use hake instead. I have also added in watercress, which is currently in peak season. It has a delicious, peppery bitterness, which contrasts well with the haddock, and is enhanced by the lemon rind, another ingredient I like to use in fish- cakes. Like most recipes, you can adapt this one by adding other fish and herbs depending on your preference. These fishcakes can be frozen for up to three months, so if you have time make a big batch. They are really moist so you don’t need any sauce – just a squeeze of lemon, or a spoon of mayonnaise if you must. Serve with a watercress or tomato salad. Serves 4 300ml of milk A sprig of thyme 1 clove of garlic 500g haddock fillet 300g floury potatoes eg Désirée, peeled and diced Salt and pepper Lemon rind from half a lemon 1 large handful of watercress leaves, chopped. Extra for salad 3 tbsp plain flour for dusting 3 tbsp breadcrumbs for coating 1 egg, beaten Olive oil In a pan, add the milk, thyme and garlic and bring to the boil. Add the haddock. Lower the heat and simmer for three minutes, then leave to one side – the fish will continue to cook as it cools. Bring the potatoes to the boil in salted water and cook for about 10 minutes. Drain well and mash lightly with a fork so the texture is still coarse. Discard the milk liquid and flake the haddock. Then add it to the crushed potatoes. Mix gently so you do not make everything mushy. Add some seasoning, the lemon rind and chopped watercress, and mould into eight fishcakes. Allow to sit in the fridge for five minutes. Place the flour, breadcrumbs and beaten egg mixture separately on three plates. Dip both sides of the fishcakes into the flour, then the egg, and finally the breadcrumbs. Shake off any excess. Heat a little olive oil in a frying pan over a medium heat. Cook the fishcakes in batches, turning every couple of minutes to evenly colour. They should take around five minutes. Check they are heated through by sticking a skewer into the middle and feeling on removal if it is hot. If necessary, flash through a hot oven for a couple of minutes. Serve with a squeeze of lemon. • Angela Hartnett is chef patron at Murano restaurant and consults at Whitechapel Gallery and Dining Room, London Fish recipes Food & drink Angela Hartnett guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …