Click here to view this media So I read this piece yesterday in which Digby discussed the notion that Rep. Paul Ryan’s Crazy Roadmap to the Future is part of a larger design to make the Catfood Commission recommendations look reasonable : If I were a conspiracy type, I might even think the catfood salesmen on the commission cooked this whole thing up sometime last December when it was obvious that the liberals weren’t going to sign on. But I’m not a conspiracy type so I’d imagine that this is just something they all fortuitously and individually stumbled into on their way to a big donor meeting. There doesn’t have to be a conspiracy — it’s just part of the culture. Look at how the Village greeted Ryan today. Cleopatra would be jealous. Digby might think that’s crazy talk, but I don’t. That’s why I posed that question to Nancy Pelosi on a blogger conference call she held today on the budget. I said that some of us were concerned that the administration was going to use the Ryan budget to make the deficit commission proposals look reasonable, and asked if she’d speak to that. The response I got wasn’t all that reassuring. “If you subtract Social Security from it, [their proposals] to make it more solvent, that doesn’t belong in any discussion about cutting the deficit,” she said. “They shouldn’t include policy decisions about Social Security. They don’t belong on the same table.” Once you subtract the Social Security proposals, “there are some good things in the deficit commission report.” She pointed out their recommendations include a “very big cut in defense” and in revenue earmarks. “There are features that are very good, not the full package,” she said. Then she said “ninety percent of our focus has to be putting the spotlight on the bad things in their budget.” I got the distinct impression I was being deflected. I won’t argue about the “good things” Leader Pelosi says are left in the deficit commission chairmans proposal after we remove the cuts to Social Security. There are, indeed, what appears to be some good, practical proposals. But Republicans aren’t going to vote for the sensible ideas on their merits. They’ll hold them hostage until they also get their wacky right-wing proposals adopted. And can we drop the political game pieces and get back to reality? Republicans don’t care about the deficit. Repeat after me: Republicans don’t care about the deficit. Did you hear a peep out of them during the Bush years? Of course not. Because Republicans don’t care about the deficit. This is the same game they’ve been playing for decades. It’s just that this time, they’ve got the Democrats running the ball for them. In soccer, they call that an “own goal”.
Continue reading …Hardball host Chris Matthews on Wednesday frothed that Republicans who want to defund Planned Parenthood are out to “kill” birth control and are “playing politics with women's health.” The MSNBC anchor railed against GOP efforts against the organization, speculating, “Why would you get rid of birth control?” Matthews defended Planned Parenthood, saying the issue isn't abortion, just a group “which I understand to be helpful in terms of women, health screening, poor women especially who wouldn't normally have a good doctor.” Teasing the segment, he piled on: ” Why are Republicans playing politics with women's health ?” During another preview, Matthews smeared, ” The Republicans are not happy with just cutting spending for old people. They want to get rid of birth control help, which baffles me if you're against abortion .” Yet, as former Planned Parenthood clinic director turned pro-life activist Abby Johnson explained in the April 4, 2011 edition of The Hill , abortion is central to Planned Parenthood: Planned Parenthood’s bottom line is numbers. And, with abortion as its primary money-maker, that means implementing a quota. I know this is true because I worked at one of their Texas clinics for 8 years, two as the clinic director. Though 98 percent of Planned Parenthood’s services to pregnant women are abortion, Planned Parenthood and its political allies have sworn up and down that taxpayer dollars do not to pay for abortion. But of course they do. Planned Parenthood gets one-third of its entire budget from taxpayer funding and performed more than 650,000 abortions between 2008 and 2009.
Continue reading …British defence sources are also looking to hire private security companies to help strengthen rebels’ position on the battlefield Britain is to urge Arab countries to train the disorganised Libyan rebels, and so strengthen their position on the battlefield before negotiations on a ceasefire, senior British defence sources have indicated. The sources said they were also looking at hiring private security companies, some of which draw on former SAS members, to aid the rebels. These private soldiers could be paid by Arab countries to train the unstructured rebel army. In what is seen in effect as the second phase of the battle to oust Muammar Gaddafi, it is now being acknowledged that the disorganised Libyan rebels are not going to make headway on their own. Nato member countries are looking at requesting Arab countries, such as Qatar or the United Arab Emirates, to train the rebels, or to fund the training. Qatar and the UAE are already involved in the Nato-led no-fly zone. Some cabinet sources said that another Arab country that might be willing to train the rebels is Jordan. They are thought to have the best-trained officers, and are possibly the best army in the region, one Cabinet source said. The training of the Libyan rebels might take as long as month to turn them into an effective force capable of holding ground, and organise flanking manoeuvres. A source said: “They’re not advancing, they’re just driving up the road, and when they see guns drawn they turn round and go back again.” The British decision to find ways to train and equip the rebels is a further sign of the determination of the coalition administration to drive out Gaddafi. It is argued that the training, if requested by the rebels, would not be in breach of the UN resolution as it would be covered by the mandate allowing “all means necessary” to protect the civilians from attacks by Gaddafi. With the Libyan rebels angered at what they regard as the reluctance of Nato to adopt a more aggressive bombing campaign, British sources insist the war simply cannot be won from the air and British troops will not be used on the ground. The British sources estimate that the number of rebel forces with a proper military background, even with defections from Gaddafi’s army, is only in the high hundreds to low thousands. At some stage a genuine ceasefire will be inevitable, so it is a question of whether it happens when the military advantage lies with Gaddafi or the rebels, the sources said. At present, the advantage is finely balanced, but with rebels unable to hold ground gained. In recent days they have been trained to dig slit trenches to create simple defensive perimeters. There is a frustration that the rebels advance 20 miles up the road, and then retreat as soon as they face Libyan government firepower. One aim is to help them launch outflanking manoeuvres leapfrogging up the coastal towns. It is being argued that there is a parallel with the Northern Alliance’s toppling of the Taliban in 2001 when there was open US air assistance, Northern Alliance activity on the ground, and CIA-backed special forces providing logistics support. Britain and the US have both said in the last week that they believe it is legal to arm the rebels under the terms of the UN resolution, but it is claimed that arming the rebels if they are not properly trained has drawbacks. The foreign secretary, William Hague, announced on Monday that the government’s national security council had agreed to meet the urgent need of the interim transitional national council in Benghazi for telecommunications equipment. Some of that equipment will allow the rebels to communicate with one another without being intercepted by Gaddafi. Britain is also looking at how it can improve close air support from the ground so that it will be easier for British Tornado planes and Typhoons to identify Gaddafi military assets in civilian areas. This kind of air support would have to be undertaken by professionals. The rebel military’s chief of staff, Abdel-Fattah Younis, complained yesterday that Nato’s bureaucratic procedures mean that it can take eight hours for the alliance to respond to a request for air support. He said that Nato could have lifted the siege of the western Libyan city of Misrata weeks ago if it had wanted to. “The people will die and this crime will be on the face of the international community for ever. What is Nato doing?” he said. Nato spokeswoman Carmen Romero dismissed the criticism, saying the number of air strikes is increasing every day while Misrata remains a priority of the air campaign. She said the alliance flew 137 missions on Monday, 186 on Tuesday, and had planned 198 for Wednesday. Rear Admiral Russell Harding, Nato’s deputy commander of operations in Libya, also said: “Libya must be 800 miles wide and in all that airspace we are dominating, so perhaps, and I am not criticising anyone, in one or two areas, if they don’t hear us or see us, I can understand how that might lead to a lack of confidence.” Britain said it was moving four Typhoon jets from policing the no-fly zone to ground-attack roles after criticism from rebels that Nato forces were failing to protect Misrata. British sources also said they are closely monitoring Gaddafi’s mustard gas stocks. They have knowledge of their location, partly to ensure that Nato air strikes do not hit the stocks, releasing gas. Gaddafi has appealed to Barack Obama to halt the Nato operation to protect opponents of his regime. In a letter, Gaddafi urged Obama to stop what he called an “unjust war against a small people of a developing country”. A US official confirmed that the US thinks the rambling three-page letter is authentic. Gaddafi addressed Obama as “our son” in the letter, and says he hopes Obama will win re-election in 2012. Libya Nato Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Network axes Tea Party icon’s daily slot amid mounting controversies and exodus of advertisers Sagging ratings, a string of damaging remarks and an exodus of advertisers have combined to end Glenn Beck’s controversial tenure on US cable network Fox News. The news follows weeks of speculation about Beck’s future, as a campaign to pressure advertisers to boycott the pundit’s daily 5pm slot gathered pace, while Beck himself was embroiled in battles erupting from his often rococo conspiracy theories involving the likes of George Soros and Barack Obama. An elliptical statement by Beck’s production company and Fox News said: “Glenn intends to transition off of his daily programme, the third highest rated in all of cable news, later this year.” But the statement also put a face-saving spin on the decision to end Beck’s show, quoting Fox News’s chief executive Roger Ailes: “Glenn Beck is a powerful communicator, a creative entrepreneur and a true success by anybody’s standards. I look forward to continuing to work with him.” The joint statement mentioned unnamed future “television projects for air on the Fox News Channel as well as content for other platforms”, without giving any detail. Beck himself wasn’t burning any bridges, saying in his statement: “I truly believe that America owes a lot to Roger Ailes and Fox News.” The Glenn Beck show has been broadcast each weekday on Fox News since January 2009, when Beck moved to the network after an ill-fated show on CNN’s Headline News channel. His current contract was due to expire in December this year. The announcement was greeted with joy among Beck’s phalanx of critics on the left. David Brock of Media Matters for America, one of Beck’s most vociferous critics, said: “After losing more than 300 advertisers and seeing more than a million viewers abandon his show, the only surprise is that it took Fox News months to reach this decision.” The StopBeck campaign, designed to lobby corporations against advertising on Beck’s show, welcomed the news with a simple Twitter posting: “VICTORY!” The show’s peak of popularity coincided with the rise of the Tea Party, and his trademark blend of paranoia and conspiracy attracting a wide following – and an equally wide circle of criticism, thanks to often bizarre statements. Beck’s string of eyebrow-raising claims on air includes his 2009 description of Obama as “a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture… This guy is, I believe, a racist.” More recently, Beck held a two-day “investigation” into George Soros, who funds a variety of liberal causes in the US. Beck’s denunciation included reference to Soros’s wartime childhood in Hungary, with Beck claiming: “Here’s a Jewish boy helping send the Jews to the death camps.” Beck’s remarks were decried as “monstrous” by Jewish groups. Beck’s audience has shrunk from a peak of around 2.9 million viewers at the start of 2010 to less than 1.8m, according to recent ratings. On Fox that left Beck lagging far behind the channel’s primetime stars, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. As the audience dried up, so did the advertising. The list of high profile advertisers avoiding his show has grown, and now includes household names such as Coca-Cola, American Express, AT&T and Nestlé. In the UK, where Beck’s show is carried by the Fox News international channel, advertisers are so scarce that the network fills the ad breaks with silent Sky News updates. Glenn Beck Fox Tea Party movement News Corporation US television industry United States US politics Richard Adams guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Network axes Tea Party icon’s daily slot amid mounting controversies and exodus of advertisers Sagging ratings, a string of damaging remarks and an exodus of advertisers have combined to end Glenn Beck’s controversial tenure on US cable network Fox News. The news follows weeks of speculation about Beck’s future, as a campaign to pressure advertisers to boycott the pundit’s daily 5pm slot gathered pace, while Beck himself was embroiled in battles erupting from his often rococo conspiracy theories involving the likes of George Soros and Barack Obama. An elliptical statement by Beck’s production company and Fox News said: “Glenn intends to transition off of his daily programme, the third highest rated in all of cable news, later this year.” But the statement also put a face-saving spin on the decision to end Beck’s show, quoting Fox News’s chief executive Roger Ailes: “Glenn Beck is a powerful communicator, a creative entrepreneur and a true success by anybody’s standards. I look forward to continuing to work with him.” The joint statement mentioned unnamed future “television projects for air on the Fox News Channel as well as content for other platforms”, without giving any detail. Beck himself wasn’t burning any bridges, saying in his statement: “I truly believe that America owes a lot to Roger Ailes and Fox News.” The Glenn Beck show has been broadcast each weekday on Fox News since January 2009, when Beck moved to the network after an ill-fated show on CNN’s Headline News channel. His current contract was due to expire in December this year. The announcement was greeted with joy among Beck’s phalanx of critics on the left. David Brock of Media Matters for America, one of Beck’s most vociferous critics, said: “After losing more than 300 advertisers and seeing more than a million viewers abandon his show, the only surprise is that it took Fox News months to reach this decision.” The StopBeck campaign, designed to lobby corporations against advertising on Beck’s show, welcomed the news with a simple Twitter posting: “VICTORY!” The show’s peak of popularity coincided with the rise of the Tea Party, and his trademark blend of paranoia and conspiracy attracting a wide following – and an equally wide circle of criticism, thanks to often bizarre statements. Beck’s string of eyebrow-raising claims on air includes his 2009 description of Obama as “a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture… This guy is, I believe, a racist.” More recently, Beck held a two-day “investigation” into George Soros, who funds a variety of liberal causes in the US. Beck’s denunciation included reference to Soros’s wartime childhood in Hungary, with Beck claiming: “Here’s a Jewish boy helping send the Jews to the death camps.” Beck’s remarks were decried as “monstrous” by Jewish groups. Beck’s audience has shrunk from a peak of around 2.9 million viewers at the start of 2010 to less than 1.8m, according to recent ratings. On Fox that left Beck lagging far behind the channel’s primetime stars, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. As the audience dried up, so did the advertising. The list of high profile advertisers avoiding his show has grown, and now includes household names such as Coca-Cola, American Express, AT&T and Nestlé. In the UK, where Beck’s show is carried by the Fox News international channel, advertisers are so scarce that the network fills the ad breaks with silent Sky News updates. Glenn Beck Fox Tea Party movement News Corporation US television industry United States US politics Richard Adams guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Authorities acknowledge police action against artist but still no word about his friend, Wen Tao, who also cannot be reached Chinese police are investigating outspoken artist Ai Weiwei for “suspected economic crimes”, the state news agency, Xinhua, has announced. Authorities had not previously acknowledged police action against the 53-year-old, who went missing on Sunday after being stopped by officials at Beijing airport. The single-sentence report, deleted shortly after it appeared, did not explicitly refer to his detention, and there was no word on his friend Wen Tao, 38, who has also been unreachable since his reported detention on the same day. Earlier, outgoing US ambassador Jon Huntsman had raised the artist’s case in a strongly worded speech in Shanghai, describing him as one of the activists who “challenge the Chinese government to serve the public in all cases and at all times”. The artist’s detention has sparked an international outcry , with the US, Britain and the European Union criticising a crackdown on dissidents and activists. Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, has summoned the Chinese ambassador over the issue. Police visited Ai’s studio three times in the week before he went missing. “He felt a premonition that he would be detained,” his wife Lu Qing told AP. “He told me something might happen to him.” She said she was particularly worried about his health as he takes medication for several illnesses. While Ai had repeatedly clashed with authorities, friends had already warned that this case appeared more serious because police had removed dozens of computers and documents from his studio and had questioned his assistants. Earlier in the day, Ai’s mother, Gao Ying, told Reuters: “I think they detained him for a reason. If they think they have something, it’s certainly a fixed case, an injustice. I think they’ll concoct some things against him.” Gao said she had been “filled with a bit of dread” since Ai angered authorities by listing the names of children who died when schools collapsed in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Officials censored discussion of the subject after public anger developed over shoddy construction. On the Sina microblog, China’s domestic equivalent of Twitter, censors deleted many messages about Ai, and a search for his name produced a warning that results were not shown due to local regulations. But internet users fought back with typical ingenuity. Several used the words “ai weilai” or “love the future” – which looks and sounds similar to his name – to call for his return. One wrote: “I really don’t dare believe that in this society, even love for the future can disappear.” China guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …PC Simon Harwood back-tracks on claim that Ian Tomlinson had been acting ‘defiantly’ at G20 protests The police officer who pushed and struck Ian Tomlinson shortly before his death was accused of lying under oath after stating that the newspaper seller had been “almost inviting a physical confrontation” at the G20 protests. Giving evidence to the Tomlinson inquest for the third and final day, PC Simon Harwood initially told the jury that the father of nine had been defiantly obstructing a police line. Tomlinson, 47, collapsed and died moments after the confrontation near the Bank of England on 1 April 2009. Harwood initially maintained he had not pushed Tomlinson from behind – despite video footage that showed he did. His insistence that Tomlinson did not have his back turned when he struck him prompted Matthew Ryder QC, for the Tomlinson family, to accuse him of giving “absurd” testimony. “The problem is that we have video of that day when you were there,” Ryder said. “That is rubbish, I suggest to you, PC Harwood, and you know it.” The police officer replied: “I was there and I saw what I saw.” The judge presiding over the inquest, Peter Thornton QC, told the police officer he did not have to answer any questions he believed would incriminate himself. However by the end of the day, Harwood had back-tracked. After further questioning from Thornton, he accepted that Tomlinson was walking away from police. He also accepted the newspaper seller was not acting “defiantly” and had his back turned to him when he struck him with a baton and pushed him to the ground. When Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan police’s territorial support group, appeared to give the jury a loose explanation of when he could use his baton, Ryder sought clarification. “Does your training tell you if someone is not a threat to you or any other person it is acceptable to baton them? Is that your training? “Yes,” replied Harwood. He believed he could use his baton when not under threat “in some circumstances”. But Samantha Leek, counsel for the Met, told Harwood she was not aware of “any training” that permitted such behaviour. Harwood referred to the instructions on use of force he said he received at the Met’s public order training centre in Gravesend, Kent. Harwood told the jury he had not expected Tomlinson to fall to the ground as a result of the push, which came immediately after his baton strike. Ryder asked: “Someone who has his back to you, you push him with that force, from behind and you didn’t expect he might fall to the ground?” Harwood replied: “No.” The barrister again accused him of lying and asked if the officer had intended to “make an example” of Tomlinson – which Harwood denied. “Because that would be a pretty horrible thing to do, do you agree? Just to make an example of them. Do you agree with that?” “Yes,” said the officer. Questioned by his own barrister, Patrick Gibbs QC, Harwood said he had found it difficult to distinguish in his evidence between his recollections of the day and what he had since seen in video. “It is for me almost impossible, very, very difficult … to be able to ascertain the differences between what I remember then, on the day, to now,” he said. The inquest continues. Ian Tomlinson G20 Sam Jones Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Glenn Beck devoted his show yesterday to predicting another “summer of rage” from the oh-so-violence-prone American Left: BECK: America, I want to warn you, this is the summer of revolution. Things are going to get worse, and I believe May is going to play a huge role, as will September. [draws breath] Oh, did I say something that I shouldn’t have, socialists and communists? Yes, we’re listening and we’re reading, sometimes right over your shoulder, and you don’t know it. Funny thing — that’s just what he predicted would happen last summer too! From June 2010: BECK: America, these guys joined with these guys — the politicians joined with the revolutionaries so they could gain power. Now it is time to break apart — because the summer of rage is about to begin. And another funny thing: He predicted the same thing in 2009 too : BECK: Now here is the One Thing that everybody seems to be missing: The extreme Left is actively calling for violence! As world economies go down the tank and unemployment continues to rise, disenfranchised people are set to explode. It kinda reminds me of those apocalyptic cults who periodically predict that the world is really about to end, so their followers all gather in the cult compound (often in remote places like Montana) to prepare for it, and then they either all drink Kool Aid and die, or they hold intensive prayer sessions and then, when the predicted Day of Doom comes and goes without event, announce that their prayers have saved the world — for now — and go home as though nothing had happened. Now that it’s Sayonara Beck at Fox News , look for him to become Alex Jones on steroids. Which means that someday we probably CAN figure on watching the armed FBI standoff from the GlennBeckian Cult Compound someday down the pike. Meanwhile, of course, Beck wants you to pay no mind to the picture of right-wing violence we’re getting :
Continue reading …Memo highlights series of government ‘red lines’ under key parts as Labour accuses coalition of public relations exercise A two-month “listening exercise” in which medical professionals will be asked to contribute to a review of changes to the NHS has been thrown into doubt by a confidential memo highlighting a series of government red lines that must be maintained. As David Cameron and Nick Clegg joined the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, on Wednesday to launch the exercise at a hospital in Surrey, the memo by NHS chief executive David Nicholson indicated there may be little room for manoeuvre in reworking the health and social care bill. The memo drew a red line beneath the fundamental planks of the bill that are not for changing: GP consortiums, an independent commissioning board to oversee them, every hospital to become a foundation trust, and Healthwatch and primary care trusts to be abolished by 2013. The memo said there would be delays in setting up Monitor, a regulatory body for bringing competition in the NHS, to which many object, which will slip to July 2012, and the abolition of strategic health authorities will also be delayed to the same date. The memo is likely to be seized on by Labour which says that the “listening exercise” is more of a PR exercise. Cameron, speaking at Frimley Park hospital, said the two-month “pause” in the bill offered health workers an opportunity to amend the government’s plans that will see 60% of the NHS budget handed to GP-led consortiums. Steve Field, former president of the Royal College of Physicians, will chair a hastily assembled forum of medical experts that will report by the end of May or the beginning of June. The prime minister said: “Let me be clear: this is a genuine chance to make a difference. Where there are good suggestions to improve the legislation, to improve the changes, those changes will be made.” But “the status quo is not an option”, he said; the NHS could deliver better care, saving more lives, if doctors rather than “managers” were put in charge. Lansley appeared to indicate on Monday, when he announced the “pause”, that the changes would not be far-reaching when he said the bill would be amended “in the normal way” when it is revived in mid-June. But Clegg made clear on Tuesday that “substantive changes” would have to be made to the legislation. Change to the NHS was vital because of the increasing numbers of elderly people who will need treatment, Cameron said. “If we want to keep an NHS that is free at the point of use we have got to make the NHS more effective,” he said. He claimed the changes were already working, with 3,000 fewer managers and 2,500 more doctors in place, and many more people accessing life-saving drugs through the cancer drugs fund. “But we recognise there are questions,” he said. At Frimley Park, breast cancer surgeon Ian Laidlaw said he was concerned that giving groups of GPs more say in what hospitals do could threaten, not enhance, the latters’ success. The multidisciplinary teams they had built up in cancer care were delivering exceptional outcomes, he told the politicians. “These have been hard won, and I’m really concerned that the commissioning driven by GPs who also hold the budget will look for cost-efficient choices which will fragment the very teams that have delivered the service.” NHS Health David Cameron Nick Clegg Andrew Lansley Sarah Boseley Michael White Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Actor says the police let her down by not telling her about evidence that tabloid hackers were targeting her The actor Leslie Ash has spoken out for the first time against the Metropolitan police for failing to investigate claims that a private investigator working for the News of the World had hacked into her mobile phone, even though the force had held evidence since 2006 that he had targeted her along with her husband and two children. Ash, a former star of Men Behaving Badly, told the Guardian: “I feel I’ve really been let down. I can’t understand their behaviour at all.” Ash and her husband, the former footballer Lee Chapman, are suing the News of the World for breach of privacy after the Met confirmed in January that in a 2006 raid on the investigator Glenn Mulcaire, it had seized notepads in which he had recorded their mobile phone numbers and those of their two sons. Despite holding that information, which Ash said includes phone numbers for her GP, bank and a teacher at her sons’ school, Scotland Yard failed to tell her that she was a target. “The police were actually withholding evidence,” she said. “I’ve been brought up to trust the police. It’s not a good time for the police at the moment.” Ash became a regular in the headlines as soon as she appeared in the hit laddish comedy Men Behaving Badly, but tabloid pressure reached its peak when cosmetic surgery left her with inflamed lips in 2003 and when she contracted a form of MRSA in hospital the following year. Her family feared she would die. Now Ash says that messages left on mobile phones belonging to her and her children at that time were used by newspapers. “That really came home to me because that is not in the public interest,” she said. “The most painful things … had been said, while I was in hospital, to my kids, to my husband [along with] things really, really personal to my agent – who wasn’t just my agent, she was my friend. “All those worries about if I was going to work again, if I was going to walk again … I just feel horrible thinking that someone’s been able to access my private messages.” Scotland Yard finally confirmed that Ash was “a person of interest” to Mulcaire three months ago. Her lawyer had written to the police last October after she sought a court order forcing the Met to make that information available. Yesterday, Ash accused the Met of deliberating seeking to suppress the truth about the scale of phone hacking at the News of the World by refusing to notify hundreds of potential victims following its original 2006 inquiry, which resulted in the arrest and conviction of Mulcaire and the former News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman. “They are hand in hand with the press,” Ash said. “We’re trying to break through into something that’s basically corrupt.” Referring to evidence given to parliament in 2003 by Rebekah Brooks, the former Sun and News of the World editor who is now chief executive of the papers’ parent company, News International, Ash said: “Rebekah said that day: ‘Yes, we have paid police before.’ That shouldn’t happen. You should be able to trust the police. Who do you trust if you can’t?” A new police phone-hacking investigation, Operation Wheeting, is now under way. On Tuesday the Met made the first arrests in the case since Goodman and Mulcaire were charged nearly five years ago. The News of the World’s chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, and the paper’s former assistant editor (news), Ian Edmondson, were released on police bail without charge. Both men deny wrongdoing. However, Ash said she was not encouraged by the arrests. “No, not at all. They’re just scapegoats. That’s all it looks like to me. The News of the World are going to try and give sacrificial lambs here. They will be happy to draw the line under those two arrests and the police will as well.” Executives insisted after Goodman was jailed that he was the only reporter at the paper who acted illegally, paying Mulcaire additional money on top of his six-figure News of the World contract to hack into messages. It has since abandoned this “rogue reporter” defence in the face of claims made in civil actions brought by a series of public figures that others at the paper were involved. Mulcaire typically wrote the first name of the journalist who had commissioned him to target a particular public figure in the top left-hand corner of his notes. The fact that he wrote “Clive” in his notepad helped to convict Mulcaire and Goodman of illegally accessing voicemails belonging to members of the royal household. Ash said the notes Mulcaire made about her and her family, along with many of their associates, included the name of a person they believe is a News of the World journalist who has been publicly linked with the hacking affair but has not been arrested. Ash said she had feared for years that underhand tactics were being employed by newspapers, including the News of the World’s rivals. Her suspicions were aroused when intensely private stories began to appear, but initially she feared that the stories had been leaked from within her circle of friends. “There were just too many things happening. It’s just certain things that happened at strange times that no one else could have known – especially when I was in hospital. Something came out in the newspaper that no one would have known apart from this friend of mine. When it came out in the paper I obviously thought it was them who had sold it.” Ash is one of around 20 people who are pursuing the News of the World in court, along with other well-known figures including the actors Steve Coogan and Sienna Miller, the former Sky Sports presenter Andy Gray and the football agent Sky Andrew. “The way they’ve done the first investigation [in 2006], the police were obviously trying to keep something very quiet,” Ash said. The former Met police assistant commissioner Andy Hayman, who was in charge of the original inquiry, claimed there were only “a handful” of victims. The Met’s acting assistant commissioner John Yates, who reviewed new evidence unearthed by the Guardian in July 2009 before concluding there were no grounds for a new inquiry, has said on several occasions that the number of people targeted was low. Referring to the number of people suing, Ash said: “Now there are [dozens] of people involved they are not going to be able to keep it quiet because for one person to take the News of the World to court – to sue – would be almost impossible, but now thousands of people are.” Ash also criticised her mobile phone provider, Vodafone, who she says refused to hand over mobile phone records dating back to the time of Mulcaire’s alleged offence. “Vodafone weren’t really helpful to start with. I contacted them. They said I had to get the police to contact our solicitors [to confirm they could release the records]. The police weren’t giving us any information so how were we going to get them to help us?” Friends in showbusiness had warned Ash that hacking was commonplace. “Someone within the PR business just said get yourself a pay-as-you-go phone because they are listening in to things. So we just stopped having conversations on the phone, but it’s quite difficult.” She conceded that she gave interviews to the press during the course of her work as an actor and TV personality but said her treatment in the media was “almost like [being] eating alive. I can’t explain it.” She said her legal action was not motivated by money or a desire for revenge. “It’s not vengeance. Well, maybe a little bit. I can’t lie to you. It really hurt me. Some of the stuff said has really, really hurt me. And if that’s what they wanted to do then they’ve done it. Maybe it is a little bit of payback time. “I want to make sure this is sorted out once and for all. If it is brushed under the carpet and these two guys are the only ones arrested, questioned, they will have a little break – a little sabbatical – and then they will come back and start doing it again. The whole tabloid culture has got to change.” James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …