If you’re not in the trade, they can be confusing occasions. These are some useful pointers for novice buyers Just recently home after five days displaying our stock at the New York Antiquarian Book Fair , and I’m resting. You need to: it’s a peculiarly exhausting business, exacerbated by the fact that I had flown in from Sydney via London, and kept waking at 2am longing for bacon and eggs. For the first three mornings I eventually got up at 6am and went out to dinner. Worked for me. Great steaks in New York. We do three fairs a year – California, New York, and London – and none of them are much fun. In the olden days (I feel an old fart moment coming on) fairs had a real buzz about them. During set-up (when dealers unpack their trunks and shelve the books) other dealers would crowd round, checking out each book as it emerged, picking up the occasional bargain. Set-up was why you were there, to see if you could buy something before the public got a look-in, and sell enough in that hectic first few hours to cover your costs. No more. Things are tighter and tougher, we’ve seen each other’s books in catalogues and online, and there is no excitement during the two-day (too long!) set-up period. We sold one book for $5,000 (£3,000), which is better than five for $4,000, and pretty much in line with what I would have expected. The key to surviving a fair emotionally is to keep expectations realistic, which means low. I set our bottom line hope at sales of $40,000, though whether such a sum is profitable depends on what you have sold. Sometimes we have books on consignment at 20% to us, at others we may be selling something we own – better yet, have owned for ages – and get an entirely positive cashflow boost. I need one. I have, alas, taken my eye off the ball this last year, with reading for the Man Booker International prize , and the effect on the business has been predictable. Even my bank manager is starting to twitch an eyelid. So it was essential both to get some money in from New York, and to generate a project or two with clients or other dealers: find a collection to buy, an archive to sell, a line to pursue. But I’m getting ahead of myself, and it may be hard for you to envisage what I’m talking about. People in specialist trades often do this, and lose their audience in a welter of trade jargon and inappropriate assumption that one will be understood. So: What is an antiquarian book fair, anyway? It is an arena for members of the rare book trade publicly to offer their stock, and for collectors to peruse it. That sounds a little dull, doesn’t it? OK, then. Dealers sit in their little, lit booths, displaying their wares like girls in Amsterdam windows. A few potential customers drift by. Sometimes money is exchanged. Some pleasure is had. Usually nobody gets hurt, but many wives are not told of the transaction. Or husbands. What sort of things might one see at the fair? Enticing ones, naturally. Hand-coloured antique maps, letters by Freud or Dickens, leatherbound sets of Jane Austen, rare books on travel, nature or military history, books illustrated by Arthur Rackham or Beatrix Potter, first editions by most of the greatest writers. Why are first editions valuable? They’re not. Most first editions are worthless, because most books are first editions – that is, not worth reprinting. A tiny number of these first editions are desirable because they are by collected authors, and were printed in small numbers. How can you tell if a book is a first edition? Generally, it can be assumed unless there is any evidence to the contrary. Why are some authors collected? Most, because they deserve to be: John Milton, Jonathan Swift, John Keats, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, James Joyce, Graham Greene. Some, because whatever their deserts, people love them: Agatha Christie, Ian Fleming, JK Rowling. Does the condition of the book matter very much? Hugely, as with all collectibles. If a book looks fresh and near-as-damn-it new, it will fetch many times more than a tired and worn copy. With 20th-century books, the presence of the original dust wrapper is crucial. A first edition of Brighton Rock (1938) without the dust wrapper is worth, say, £2,000. With it? I just paid £80,000 for one, on behalf of a customer. Isn’t that silly? Very. But the argument is that a book without its dust wrapper is as incomplete as a Chippendale chair without its legs. Do you think that’s a fair argument? No. How does one know if the asking price is right? There is no “right” price for a rare book, though there are certainly wrong ones. If you buy from a reputable member of the trade, and you are happy with your purchase, then the price is probably right enough. But isn’t a book worth whatever it fetches? Certainly not. If I convince a muddle-headed plutocrat to pay me £1m for a common book, it doesn’t mean it is worth it. It means I am a crook, and he is an idiot. Books can be under- or over-priced. That’s part of the fun: trying to locate the former and avoid the latter. When I find what I want, should I ask for a discount? Yes. Will I get one? These days, for sure. What advice could you give to a new collector? Only buy what you like. Always buy the best copy you can afford. Buy fewer books, at a higher level. Buy from someone you have reason to trust. Spend 30% more than you can afford. What about buying and selling at auction? Auctioneers claim that (1) you get the best bargains if you buy at auction, and (2) you can get the best prices if you sell at auction. Both can’t be true, though it is amazing how many people believe it. But about 90% of the books at auction are sold to members of the book trade. It’s best to know what you are doing. Can’t you get a better deal on ebay, and cut out the middleman? Every now and again you might. You are more likely to end up roasted with an apple in your mouth. How do you explain the allure of rare books? You either feel it or you don’t. It’s a matter of taste, and inclination, and, like love, doesn’t need to be justified. I think holding a copy of the first edition of Ulysses, or Great Expectations, is thrilling, especially with a presentation inscription by the author. If you don’t feel similarly, you haven’t got the makings of a book collector. In fact, I don’t even think I would like you. Final note: we ended up with takings of $60,000, which was not bad, and buying three or four things at reasonable prices, that will make one or two of our collectors very happy. I am now eating breakfast in the morning, and dinner in the evening. Maybe I will sleep through the night one day soon. Booksellers Rick Gekoski guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …We’ve got a pretty good inkling that it’s coming — the big question is when will Amazon finally ship an LCD tablet. According to DigiTimes, and its occasionally trusty sources at upstream component makers, when is defined by the second half of 2011. What’s more, the media tablet will feature a Fringe Field Switching LCD display and touch panel from Amazon fave E Ink Holdings , a company better known for the technology behind the Kindle’s EPD e-paper displays. According to DigiTimes , Quanta has received the manufacturing honors with production expected to peak at about 700,000 – 800,000 units per month. So yeah, the Amazon Kindle tablet won’t be sporting a Mirasol display according to this gossip. Then again, it’s only gossip so anything goes. Amazon tablet shipping later this year according to new tattle originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 03 May 2011 01:33:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …President Asif Ali Zardari hits back at US accusations that his country knew al-Qaida leader Bin Laden was in Abbottabad President Asif Ali Zardari has hit back against American accusations that his country secretly sheltered Osama bin Laden, who was killed on Sunday night, and has claimed Pakistan played a role in leading US special forces to the al-Qaida leader. “Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing,” Zardari said. “Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact.” It was the first high-level rebuttal by the Pakistani government after a day of trenchant criticism from US commentators and officials , who questioned how the Saudi fugitive managed to live for years in a wealthy suburb close to one of Pakistan’s most prestigious military facilities. The dramatic 40-minute air assault that killed Bin Laden was carried out by US Navy Seals who crossed from Afghanistan in four helicopters and targeted a house in Abbottabad, a two-hour drive north of Islamabad. The spacious $1m (£600,000) compound is located a few streets from the Pakistan Military Academy , the country’s equivalent of Sandhurst or West Point. “People have been referring to this as hiding in plain sight. We are looking at how he was able to hide out there for so long,” said White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan. It was “inconceivable” that Bin Laden did not enjoy a “support system” in Pakistan, he said. Writing in the Washington Post , Zardari said his country was “the world’s greatest victim of terrorism”, called Bin Laden “the source of the greatest evil of the new millennium”, and claimed that Pakistan had played a role in identifying the al-Qaida courier who ultimately led US forces to Bin Laden. “Although the events of Sunday were not a joint operation, a decade of co-operation and partnership between the United States and Pakistan led up to the elimination of Osama bin Laden as a continuing threat to the civilised world,” he said. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, perhaps anxious not to alienate a partner still vital to actions against al-Qaida, appeared to partly agree. “In fact, co-operation with Pakistan helped lead us to Bin Laden and the compound in which he was hiding,” she said. Zardari’s comments will please Pakistan’s powerful military, the real target of American accusations of double-dealing. The army’s spokesman has been silent over the Abbottabad operation, although senior officials from Pakistan’s ISI intelligence agency insisted they had not been informed beforehand. The army faces many questions as well as anger over the breach of sovereignty, including how a fleet of US helicopters managed to fly through Pakistan’s air defences and return to Afghanistan unhindered. Precise details about Bin Laden’s final moments are still emerging. US officials said he was killed by gunfire in the final stages of the 40-minute assault, as was one of his sons and his youngest wife. The White House claimed she had been used by Bin Laden as a human shield. Bin Laden, codenamed Geronimo for the operation, was shot twice, in the head and chest. Brennan denied the soldiers were under orders to kill, not capture. “If we had the opportunity to take him alive, we would have done,” he said. After his death soldiers shouted “Geronimo EKIA”, meaning enemy killed in action. His body was taken by helicopter to a US aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf and buried at sea. Barack Obama said: “The world is safer. It is a better place because of the death of Osama bin Laden.” Such was the American distrust of the notoriously leaky Pakistan government that it did not even inform it of the raid in its own territory until after the helicopters had cleared Pakistani airspace. Members of Congress have threatened to withhold economic aid to Pakistan over the affair. Carl Levin, a Democrat who heads the powerful Senate armed services committee, reflected scepticism in the US about Bin Laden’s ability to remain hidden in Pakistan. “I think the Pakistani army and intelligence have a lot of questions to answer given the location, the length of time and the apparent fact that this facility was actually built for Bin Laden and its closeness to the central location of the Pakistani army,” he told a press conference. The US is expected to step up pressure on Pakistan to hand over the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar and Bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, if they are in Pakistan. The death of Bin Laden could also lead to a rethink of the scale of the US involvement in Afghanistan. Embassies, airports and defence bases were placed on high alert for possible retaliation by al-Qaida sympathisers. The Pakistani Taliban threatened attacks against the country’s government and military, and the US. In a phone call to Reuters, a spokesman said: “Now Pakistani rulers, President Zardari and the army will be our first targets. America will be our second target”. The US embassy and its three consulates in Pakistan were closed to the public until further notice. David Cameron warned of a continuing threat from “extremist terrorism” but hailed a “massive step forward”. The mood in the US was one of celebration as Americans gathered at Ground Zero in New York , pleased finally to have retribution. Obama will visit the site of the World Trade Centre on Thursday to meet the families of those killed in the September 11 attacks. Clinton suggested that US policy on Afghanistan would not shift, but other officials hinted the dynamics may have changed. The Pentagon only wants to see a token force of a few thousand withdrawn beginning in the summer, but Obama may want a more significant reduction. An Afghan government official said he feared Bin Laden’s death would give “justification for US premature disengagement from the region”. It was a view echoed by Ahmed Wali Massoud, an Afghan politician and brother of Ahmed Shah Massoud, the legendary resistance fighter who was assassinated just two days before the September 11 attacks on the orders of Bin Laden. “Already the US has been thinking about shifting its policy on the war on terror and there is a risk that the American public will continue to question why their troops are still fighting there,” he said. One of the most senior US officers serving in Afghanistan, General William Caldwell, told the Guardian the death might encourage moderate elements within the Taliban to give up. John Taylor, whose daughter Carrie, 24, was killed in the 7/7 bombings in London in 2005, said he would be celebrating. “This is poetic justice for my daughter. This is a little piece of justice for Carrie and the thousands around the world who have been killed as a result of [Bin Laden's] actions.” Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Pakistan United States Global terrorism US national security US foreign policy US military Afghanistan Declan Walsh Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Discovery of audio recorder two days after flight data recorder brings investigators closer to cause of June 2009 crash Search parties scouring the seabed off Brazil’s north-east coast have recovered the second of two flight recorders from the Air France aircraft that crashed into the Atlantic in June 2009, investigators have said. The discovery of the audio recorder, two days after the flight data recorder was fished up, brings investigators even closer to the cause of the crash as it should hold recordings of cockpit conversations during the flight’s final moments. “We can now hope to find out what truly happened within the next three weeks,” the French transport minister, Thierry Mariani, told RTL radio on Tuesday. The investigation team identified the cockpit voice recorder at 9.50pm GMT on Monday , France’s BEA air accident inquiry office said in a statement. The device was hauled up to the team’s ship at 2.40am GMT on Tuesday. A BEA spokeswoman said the black box would be shipped back to France, probably by the end of next week. “The outside appears to be in relatively good shape,” she said, adding that it would only be possible to see if the recorder was “usable” once it was opened, which would not happen until it was back in France. A photograph of the recorder on BEA’s website shows a bright orange cylindrical device that looks scuffed and battered but otherwise intact. So-called black boxes are painted orange so that they can be spotted more easily in wreckage. The Airbus 330-203 airliner plunged into the sea off Brazil en route to Paris from Rio de Janeiro in June 2009 after running into stormy weather, killing all 228 passengers and crew. The discovery of the two flight recorders follows nearly two years of on-off search efforts over a 10,000 sq km area of seabed. Theories about the cause of the disaster have focused on the possible icing up of the aircraft’s speed sensors, which seemed to give inconsistent readings before communication was lost. Depending on how much data can be retrieved and how clearly it pinpoints the cause of the crash, lawyers say information from the black boxes could lead to a flood of liability claims. Any fresh conclusions on the cause will also be fed into a judicial probe already under way in which Airbus and Air France have both been placed under formal investigation. Plane crashes Air transport Airbus France guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Zardari denies Pakistan harboured bin Laden • Cameron: questions will be asked about Pakistan’s role • Global security clampdown at embassies and airports 8.58am: Welcome to our continuing live coverage of the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden. One of the main subjects today looks set to be accusations that Pakistan had been harbouring bin Laden . Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari dismissed such charges as “baseless speculation”. Writing in the Washington Post , he said: Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing. Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact. Pakistan had as much reason to despise al-Qaida as any nation. The war on terrorism is as much Pakistan’s war as it is America’s. In Britain, David Cameron chaired a 45-minute meeting of the government’s Cobra emergencies committee , and will update MPs on events in a Commons statement later today. Cameron said Pakistan had “lots of questions” to answer. But he warned against a “flaming great row” with Pakistan’s leaders, who he said were committed to tackling terrorism. Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, he said: We should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. But we should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Middle East Pakistan United States Obama administration US foreign policy UN MDG summit 2010 Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Zardari denies Pakistan harboured bin Laden • Cameron: questions will be asked about Pakistan’s role • Global security clampdown at embassies and airports 8.58am: Welcome to our continuing live coverage of the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden. One of the main subjects today looks set to be accusations that Pakistan had been harbouring bin Laden . Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari dismissed such charges as “baseless speculation”. Writing in the Washington Post , he said: Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing. Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact. Pakistan had as much reason to despise al-Qaida as any nation. The war on terrorism is as much Pakistan’s war as it is America’s. In Britain, David Cameron chaired a 45-minute meeting of the government’s Cobra emergencies committee , and will update MPs on events in a Commons statement later today. Cameron said Pakistan had “lots of questions” to answer. But he warned against a “flaming great row” with Pakistan’s leaders, who he said were committed to tackling terrorism. Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, he said: We should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. But we should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Middle East Pakistan United States Obama administration US foreign policy UN MDG summit 2010 Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Two killed and 14 injured in New Zealand’s largest city in the wake of tornado which cut a three-mile path across suburb A tornado has ripped across part of New Zealand’s largest city, upturning cars and sending debris slicing through the air. Civil defence officials put the death toll at two, with at least 14 injured. The swirling dark-grey column of air and cloud cut a three-mile (5km) path across the Auckland suburb of Albany at mid-afternoon on Tuesday, tearing off roofs, flattening trees and tossing vehicles around, police and witnesses said. “There were kids in a car which turned upside down and they had to get help,” said Hamish Blair, whose golf supplies store was in the hardest-hit area. “There’s probably six or seven seriously damaged cars, and I saw cars flying off the ground about 30m (100 feet) in the air.” “We’ve got our fingers crossed that injuries are limited and that there are no further fatalities,” Auckland’s mayor Len Brown told Radio New Zealand. The tornado first touched down in Albany and then passed through neighbouring Birkenhead. Most of the serious damage was in Albany, where a shopping mall, a large hardware store and a supermarket were hit. Radio New Zealand reported that the roof of the Mega Centre mall in Albany collapsed. Tornadoes are not uncommon in New Zealand, particularly on the country’s North Island, where Auckland lies. But they tend to be smaller than those seen in the US midwest. Auckland generally gets one or two tornadoes a year, according to New Zealand’s ministry of civil defence and emergency management. New Zealand has been hit by several natural disasters in recent months, including an earthquake on 22 February that devastated the South Island city of Christchurch and killed at least 169 people. New Zealand Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Conservative Stephen Harper has won a majority government • Shattering defeat for the opposition Liberals • Leftist New Democrats projected to become the main opposition party Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper won his coveted majority government in Canada’s elections on Monday that also marked a shattering defeat for the opposition Liberals, with leader Michael Ignatieff accepting responsibility for the historic defeat. In another significant shift, the leftist New Democrats are projected to become the main opposition party for the first time in Canadian history with 106 seats, in a stunning upset over the Liberals who have always been either in power or leading the opposition. Harper, who took office in 2006, has won two elections but until now had never held a majority of Parliament’s 308 seats, forcing him to rely on the opposition to pass legislation. While Harper’s hold on the 308-member Parliament has been tenuous during his five-year tenure, he has managed to nudge an instinctively centre-left country to the right. He has gradually lowered sales and corporate taxes, avoided climate change legislation, promoted Arctic sovereignty, upped military spending and extended Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan. Elections Canada reported preliminary results on its website, giving the Conservatives 164 seats, which will mean four years of uninterrupted government for Harper. “It’s stunning. We’re elated,” Conservative lawmaker Jason Kenney said in an interview with CBC. “We’ll be a government for all Canadians.” The leftist New Democrats are projected to become the main opposition party for the first time in Canadian history with 106 seats, in a stunning upset over the Liberals who have always been either in power or leading the opposition. Former colleagues of Harper say his long-term goals are to kill the image of the Liberals the party of Jean Chretien, Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau as the natural party of government in Canada, and to redefine what it means to be Canadian. Harper took a major step toward that on Monday night as the Liberals dropped to 35 seats from 77, according to the preliminary results. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff congratulated Harper and New Democrat leader Jack Layton and accepted responsibility for the “historic defeat.” “I will play any part that the party wishes me to play as we go forward to rebuild,” Ignatieff said. Stephen Clarkson, professor at the University of Toronto said Harper will now be considered a transformative figure in Canadian history. “It’s a sea change,” Clarkson said. The New Democrats’ gains are being attributed to Layton’s strong performance in the debates, a folksy, upbeat message and a desire by the French-speakers in Quebec, the second most populous province, for a new face after growing weary of the separatist Bloc Quebecois. The NDP’s gains marked a remarkable shift in a campaign started out weeks ago looking like a straight battle between Harper and Ignatieff, with the 60-year-old Layton recovering from prostate cancer and a broken hip. Harper campaigned on a message that the New Democrats stood for “higher taxes, higher spending, higher prices, protectionism. He called the election a choice between “a Conservative majority” and “a ramshackle coalition led by the NDP that will not last but will do a lot of destruction.” Canada Stephen Harper Michael Ignatieff guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addressed the assassination of Osama bin Laden Monday. “Osama bin Laden is dead and justice has been done,” she said. “I know that nothing can make up for the loss of the victims or fill the voids they left, but I hope their families can now find some comfort in the fact that justice has been served.” And the Secretary had a message for al Qaeda and the Taliban. “Our message to the Taliban remains the same, but today, it may have even greater resonance. You cannot wait us out. You cannot defeat us, but you can make the choice to abandon al Qaeda and participate in a peaceful political process.”
Continue reading …Eisläuferin is part of an outstanding collection of postwar German art to be sold at Sotheby’s One of Gerhard Richter’s earliest paintings, which the artist thought had been destroyed long ago, has emerged in the most significant collection of recent German art ever to come on the market. Richter’s paintings over the past 50 years are all in his catalogue raisonné – a comprehensive list of his works. Eisläuferin, “skater”, holds a special place at No 2, but until now the only version available has been a poor-quality mono illustration on Richter’s website. The original is expected to fetch up to £3m Sotheby’s is to auction Eisläuferin along with other works from the 1960s and 1970s. The sale, in June, will include canvases by Georg Baselitz and Sigmar Polke, all assembled by German industrialist Count Christian Duerckheim. Cheyenne Westphal, Sotheby’s head of contemporary art in Europe, said of Eisläuferin: “It is a special painting last exhibited in 1963 in a very, very early group show that Richter was part of and then the artist lost sight of the piece. Basically Richter and everyone around him thought that the work was destroyed.” “We are working very closely with Richter’s archive and the team around the artist are very excited,” she said. The work is one of 59 in the sale, with a total estimated value in excess of £33m. “It is a truly outstanding collection. We’ve never seen anything like it on the market,” said Westphal, describing the paintings as a “portrait of a generation of artists”. She added: “To have a collection of this quality, depth and unbelievable freshness has never happened before.” Richter, who will have a retrospective at Tate Modern this autumn to mark his 80th birthday, is also represented by works such as Telefonierender, an early photo-painting, and 1024 Farben, a vivid colour chart. Many of the works have not been seen publicly since they were exhibited in the early 1960s. One of the auction’s highlights is Baselitz’s The Big Night Down the Drain, which Sotheby’s believes is “the most important German work of art of the postwar period to come to the market”. The canvas – showing a short, ugly man holding his outsized erect penis – was inspired by a newspaper story about Irish poet Brendan Behan reading his work on stage, drunk and with his flies open. In 1963 it was confiscated by the German authorities for “infringement of public morality”. Baselitz got the painting back only after several years, and several court cases. The Big Night Down the Drain has a sale estimate of £2m-£3m. During a 2007 retrospective in London, curator Norman Rosenthal wrote: “The artist recently stated in public that perhaps he never has and never will make a finer painting.” Duerckheim has other important examples of the artist’s work including Spekulatius, from the Hero series. One of the Polke works is Jungle, the largest of the artist’s dot paintings, estimated to be worth £3m-£4m. “We all thought it was a much smaller work than it is,” said Westphal. “When I finally got to see the painting I nearly fainted. It was so amazing and such a discovery.” Duerckheim says he is selling because he feels the collection is complete and it is time to start something new. It will be shown publicly in London before the sale. Gerhard Richter Germany Europe Mark Brown guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …