Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 503)
Here Come the Torture Apologists

Click here to view this media Color me not shocked. Not only is the right desperately trying to give Bush credit for locating and killing Osama bin Laden, now the torture apologists are coming out of the woodwork as well. Expect to see more of this over the coming weeks. Resident wingnut and GOP New York Rep. Peter King went on O’Reilly’s show and claimed that torturing prisoners by waterboarding them led to locating Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. Marcy Wheeler has a post up debunking King’s claims and I’ll just ask that our readers go check out her entire post here — The Osama bin Laden Trail Shows Waterboarding Didn’t Work .

Continue reading …
DVD sales plummet 20% in US

Hollywood studios feel impact of rapid shift to online film and TV viewing DVD sales plunged 20% in the US in the first quarter of 2011, with Hollywood studios blaming the timing of Easter and a glut of blockbuster releases in the same period last year for the $500m (£303m) year-on-year revenue slump. The sale of DVDs and Blu-ray discs fell from $2.58bn to just more than $2bn in the first three months of the year, according to a report by industry body the Digital Entertainment Group. The DEG study also found rentals of DVDs through outlets such as Blockbuster plunged 36% year on year to $440m. However, consumer spending on streaming and subscription services such as Netflix rose 33% to $695m. The increase is from a relatively low base and the growth in digital revenues failed to cover a 10% fall in US home entertainment spending in the first quarter to $4.18bn. DEG’s latest figures highlight how the Hollywood studios are feeling the impact of the rapid shift to digital consumption of film and TV content. The movie industry is struggling with the same issues faced by the music sector a decade ago, with digital revenues not yet enough to compensate for the decline in sales of traditional physical products. “The industry has proven resilient, with modest gains posted in a number of key areas,” the report said. The report pointed out that there were four “tentpole” cinema releases in the first quarter last year, which accounted for $1bn in revenues, for which there was “no such equivalent” in the first three months of 2011. “The second quarter is off to a strong start, with sell-through [sales of DVDs and Blu-ray discs] up 20% in the first few weeks alone,” the report said. Overall an “impressive array of blockbuster theatrical releases” later this year will “help to round out 2011, with consumer spend flat, or slightly up, and transactions up by the end of the year”. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Digital media Media business Film industry Television industry Online TV Internet Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tomlinson unlawfully killed, inquest rules

•  Newspaper seller ‘unlawfully killed’ at G20 protests • Jury took just over three hours to reach verdict • Family breaks down in tears at news • Read our news story on the Tomlinson verdict • Follow live updates and reaction here 3.55pm: Ian Tomlinson’s family will be giving a statement in about 25 minutes. I’ll post an update with the details here. 3.53pm: We’ve just published my news story on the verdict , which recaps the evidence from the hearing and explains how jurors were given two divergent explanations of Tomlinson’s death. The first pathologist to conduct a postmortem examination on the body, Dr Freddy Patel, said he died of a heart attack as a result of coronary heart disease. He was contradicted by three other pathologists who examined Tomlinson’s body, all of whom found he died of internal bleeding in the abdomen. Starmer said last July that complications with medical evidence led him to believe prosecutors were unlikely to prove a cause of death. His decision was supported by the attorney general, Dominic Grieve. Both will now have to consider how a jury of seven men and four women concluded Tomlinson died as a result of being pushed by Harwood. 3.47pm: A quick word on the importance of “unlawful killing” as a verdict. To reach an unlawful killing conclusion, the jury were required to have been satisfied to a higher burden of proof than the other possible verdicts, which could have been reached “on the balance of probabilities”. But to reach the unlawful killing verdict, the jury had to be convinced “beyond reasonable doubt”, the same threshold used in criminal trials. 3.45pm: For legal reasons, the jury was not permitted to name “the police officer”, but we know that he was PC Simon Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Support Group. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, who decided in July last year not to prosecute Harwood for manslaughter, will now be under intense pressure to reverse that decision. An official Crown Prosecution Service review of the decision not to prosecute Harwood is now under way. 3.42pm: The court was caught unaware by the jury’s quick decision. They returned to the room and answered four short questions, known as the inquisition. What was the name of the deceased? Ian Tomlinson. What was the cause of his death? Injury or disease? Abdominal haemorrhage due to blunt force trauma to the abdomen in association with cirrhosis of the liver. If the person died of injury, what were the circumstances? Mr Tomlinson was on his way home from work on the 1st of April 2009 during the G20 demonstration. He was fatally injured at around 19.20pm on Royal Exchange Buildings … This was the result of a baton strike from behind and a push by the officer which caused Ian Tomlinson to fall heavily. The jury said both the baton strike and the push were “unreasonable”. “As a result, Mr Tomlinson suffered internal bleeding which led to his collapse within a few minutes and his subsequent death.” The jury decided that at the time of the strike and push Tomlinson was was walking away from the officer and “posed no threat”. What is the jury’s conclusion as to the death? Unlawful killing. 3.37pm: Ian Tomlinson’s family could be heard shouting “yes” at the verdict. His wife, Julia, six of their children are present at the hearing and have broken down, crying. 3.34pm: The jury has concluded Ian Tomlinson was unlawfully killed by a police officer at the G20 protests. 3.32pm: The jury has taken just three hours and fifteen minutes to reach their verdict. 3.30pm: Welcome back to the Ian Tomlinson inquest blog. The verdict is now imminent. For five weeks eleven men and women have heard detailed evidence about Tomlinson’s death at the G20 protests on April 1, 2009. They heard how he was struck with a baton and pushed to the ground by Metropolitan police officer Simon Harwood at 7.20pm. Tomlinson collapsed just under three minutes later. They retired to deliberate their findings at 11.15am. They are about to come back and deliver their verdict. Police Metropolitan police Protest London G20 Ian Tomlinson Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Yes Folks, Glenn Beck Went There

Click here to view this media Glenn Beck just couldn’t resist. Even as he is giving credit to the President, he says “Kill Obama…” It’s not accidental on the part of these idiots. They do it on purpose, and one day some wingnut is going to take them up on it. Bonus: He finds tape of President Obama using the term “caliphate”, and thinks it justifies his own whacko conspiracy theories . All in the span of 1 minute, 14 seconds. It may be a new record.

Continue reading …

Lots of great material for today's all-new episode of NewsBusted. Remember, if you've got a comedic side, you can submit your own jokes to the 'Busted crew – and get paid for it! Check for details below the video. And remember to subscribe to our YouTube channel . Topics in today's show: — We got Bin Laden — Obama releases birth certififace — Head of Black Chamber of Commerce: Obama's a Marxist — Teleprompter inventor dead at 91 — Tornados ravage the American south — Obama tours southern states — Royal couple etched on British man's teeth — Queen of England turns 85 Starring: Jodi Miller Director: Bruce Roundtower Executive Producer: Dialog New Media Feeling generous? Text 'NewsBusters' to 85944 to make a $10 contribution to keep 'Busted going strong. NewsBusted is a comedy webcast about the news of the day, uploaded every Tuesday and every Friday. If you like the show, be sure to tell your friends and family! Think you're funny? Send your (short) jokes to newsbusted at dialognewmedia.com. If we use them, we'll pay you USD $50 for each one.

Continue reading …
Making the most of your law degree

With average tuition fees set to hit £8,700, here’s how to minimise the financial damage while maximising CV gains So much for the government’s estimate that average tuition fees would be £7,500. With the majority of universities set to charge the full £9,000 when the fee cap is removed next year, the actual average currently stands more than £1,000 higher than anticipated – at almost £8,700. Such amounts may have little impact on those destined for elite City law firms and leading commercial barristers’ chambers, which pay trainees about £40,000 a year. But law students who pursue careers in areas such as legal aid, where entry-level earnings are among the lowest of any graduate job, look set to be weighed down by their university debts for years to come. How, then, can prospective lawyers keep the financial damage to a minimum, while at the same time gain CV-boosting experience to help them stand out in a graduate job market that’s more competitive than ever? Do a “vac scheme” – even if you have no intention of joining up full time Corporate law firms’ formal work experience programmes – which pay up to £300 a week – have traditionally been the preserve of City types. But the impressive breadth of some “vac schemes” make them worthwhile for students planning careers in other areas of law, where paid work experience is much harder to come by. Clifford Chance and Linklaters, for example, offers interns the opportunity to do pro bono – good experience for those who want to go into publicly funded legal practice. Herbert Smith and Hill Dickinson allows placement students to spend time in their specialist advocacy units, which employ in-house barristers – an excellent opportunity for bar wannabes who miss out on one of the few paid chambers work experience gigs (the handful of chambers offering funded mini-pupillages include One Gray’s Inn Square, 2 Temple Gardens, Pump Court Tax and 5 Stone Buildings). A word of warning, though: “Commercial firms want vac scheme students who are committed to their core business,” says Edward Walker, graduate recruitment manager at national law firm Pinsent Masons. “Those who aren’t may get found out during interview.” Don’t undervalue unglamorous part-time jobs Walker thinks a good strategy for law students is to find regular paid part-time work – however unglamorous – to help them survive, then weave what they have learned from it into their CVs in a thoughtful way. “A student working on the checkout at Sainsbury’s is more impressive than they often realise,” he says, adding that law firms have become slightly tired of CVs featuring “a long list of exciting-sounding, yet not especially substantial, jobs”. Walker continues: “Let’s not forget that companies like Sainsbury’s are law firms’ core clients. Understanding how their business works from the bottom up is very useful.” The experience of first-year Manchester University law student Joseph Tomlinson bears this out: “To my amazement, barristers’ chambers have been impressed by the fact I worked as a chef during my A-levels, because of the transferable skills it gave me. Despite this I have been repeatedly told by my careers service to leave this role off my CV because it has no relevance to law.” Find time for unpaid pro bono While law firms and barristers’ chambers value exposure to the commercial world, they are also keen on applicants with hands-on experience advising clients on legal matters. “Pro bono shows commitment to being a lawyer,” says Pinsent Masons’ Walker. But how do students fit in pro bono work – which often involves the time-consuming process of getting your head around new areas of law – when their evenings are spent at Sainsbury’s and their holidays full of work-experience placements? One way is to select a degree course where pro bono work is included as part of the curriculum. The law schools at the Universities of Kent (which won best law school at the annual LawWorks and Attorney General Student pro bono awards), Hull and Northumbria are all known for their “clinical” approach to legal education. Students at the former are encouraged to base their dissertations on issues arising from the real-life cases on which they have acted. “Pro bono works best when it’s not an add-on,” says Elaine Heslop, a lecturer and clinic solicitor at the University of Kent. Compete Like pro bono work, mooting (mock advocacy conducted in a courtroom setting) is time-consuming. “I won’t pretend that I haven’t lost a lot of sleep preparing bundles and skeleton arguments,” says Karamvir Chadha, who won the 2009 English Speaking Union-Essex Court Chambers national mooting competition. Unlike pro bono work, though, mooting can offer substantial financial rewards: for his triumph Chadha picked up a cash prize of £1,000; a similar sum is awarded to the winner of the other main national mooting event, the Oxford University Press & BPP national mooting competition. For those who prefer to make their arguments on paper – and are sufficiently motivated to spend their free time writing yet more essays – the rewards can be even greater. The annual Times and One Essex Court legal essay competition pays out £10,000 worth of prizes, out of which £3,500 goes to the writer of the winning piece. Take a gap year and hope a law firm will do a KPMG Earlier this year, accountants KPMG launched an initiative to sponsor students through undergraduate degrees while they work part-time for the firm, which will see it cover tuition fees, pay them a salary and give them a full-time job at the end of the course. Law firms have been looking on with interest. James Furber, senior partner at Farrer & Co, is in favour of his firm adopting a similar initiative “to keep a route into the profession open for students from less well off backgrounds”, as is Michael Shaw, head of national law firm Cobbetts. And College of Law chief executive Nigel Savage says he has “meetings lined up” with several magic circle (the five leading London-based) law firms about sponsoring students through its recently launched two-year accelerated undergraduate law degree. Those not keen on parting with £9,000 a year will hope that other firms follow KPMG’s lead. Alex Aldridge is a freelance journalist who writes about law and education Law University funding Tuition fees Alex Aldridge guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Running with Ethiopians

After four months of training with some of the greatest runners in the world, it was time for a half-marathon north of the border I’m running along by the shore of a wide, glistening lake. Up ahead, a herd of horses are hauling themselves out of the water and crossing the path. The runner in front of me manages to skirt around one side, making the horses skip back. I spot my chance and nip through the same gap. I’m running a half-marathon in Ethopia, the self-proclaimed “land of runners”. As I cross the finish line, the greatest distance-runner ever, Haile Gebrselassie . is standing there smiling, ready to shake my hand. Ethiopia is Kenya’s northern neighbour and fierce athletics rival. Although Kenyans win more races and have more top athletes than anywhere else in the world, their dominance in distance running is seriously dented by a small group of super-fast Ethiopians. While the nation doesn’t have the same quantity of athletes or cover the same range of events (Kenyans regularly win medals at 400m and 800m too), the list of Ethiopian world-record holders and Olympic champions is testament to its running prowess. Ethiopia has won the men’s 10,000m at the last four Olympics, and Ethiopian men currently hold the 5000m, 10,000m and marathon world records. Ethiopian women have also won four gold medals in the last three Olympics, compared to Kenya’s two. So I’ve come to Ethiopia to run, too. And my first port of call is the town of Hawassa where, on the shores of the lake, Gebrselassie has built himself a huge luxury hotel, the Haile Resort . And it’s here that I’m undergoing the first test of my Kenyan training. After four months of chasing my tail around the steep hills of Iten , gasping like a dying man as I try to keep up with the Kenyans, I’m running the Every One half-marathon . Sponsored by Save the Children , USAID and a host of other NGOs, this is a light-hearted charity race and there are lots of other non-Africans running. In fact, the pack seems to be made up mostly of aid workers, both Ethiopian and foreign, from Addis Ababa. The “elite” runners – 70 Ethiopians and one Kenyan – get to run their own race later, after our “mass race” is over. To avoid the worst of the day’s heat, which descends early here in Hawassa, the event starts at 6.30am. After all my early morning runs in Kenya, it seems quite natural to be up and running at this time, so I’m feeling fairly sprightly as I do some last-minute limbering up on the start line. And then with a blast of a hooter we’re off. Almost immediately I find myself running on my own, with a lead group of about six runners pulling ahead while everyone else seems to have drifted away behind me. The course winds along a dirt track by the lake and then up and through the town. Lots of local people are out to cheer us on, clapping and shouting “bravo” as we go by – a remnant of a brief Italian occupation in the 1930s. At one point the crowd gets very angry with an Ethiopian runner as I overtake him. I can hear them berating him behind me for a while but eventually, after I get far enough ahead, the general clapping and good-natured encouragement returns. Halfway round the second of three laps, I catch a glimpse of my shadow on the tarmac road. I actually look like an athlete, striding away strongly along the wide avenue. Twelve kilometres done and I’m cruising. By the time I pass the same point on the third lap, however, it’s not such a glorious sight. My stride length has shortened, my arms have stopped moving. I’m struggling with a stitch, which actually forces me to stop and do some stretching. It keeps coming and going. The slower I run, the better it is. Or is that just my mind playing tricks on me? I’m caught in a battle of wills between my desire to run as fast as I can, and my body’s desire to slow down. My body, though, has co-opted my mind to its cause, and the desire to run fast is being drowned out by the rationalising chatter that tells me it doesn’t really matter what time I run, or where I finish, that I should just enjoy the experience, jog home, that I’ve tried hard enough already. Despite being talked down like this from pushing on too hard, I manage to keep on and cross the line in 7th place, in a personal best time of 1 hour 26 minutes and 47 seconds. The seconds are important, because it’s a best time by just seven seconds. Gebrselassie greets me like a long-lost friend. I collect my medal and free T-shirt, and even get myself a quick massage, before heading off to find some breakfast. So, after four months of training with the greatest runners in the world, I’ve knocked seven seconds off my best half-marathon time. I was really hoping for a bigger improvement than that. But then again, the race was run at an altitude of 5,500ft. I got a bad stitch. And just two days before it I was ill, recovering in my hotel room in Addis Ababa and being forced to watch the royal wedding by my children. So maybe it wasn’t so bad. As for the elite race, it was won by Kimutai Kiplimo, the one Kenyan invited to the race as motivation for the Ethiopian runners to go faster. Another point to the Kenyans. They’re having a good year so far . Running Fitness Athletics Ethiopia Kenya Adharanand Finn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
PM: Brooks dinner ‘not a problem’

Prime minister denies it was inappropriate to dine with News Corp bosses while government was considering BSkyB deal The prime minister, David Cameron, has denied that it was inappropriate for him to have dinner at the home of senior News Corporation executive Rebekah Brooks while the government was considering the company’s takeover bid for BSkyB. Cameron said Brooks, the chief executive of News Corp’s UK newspaper publisher News International, was “married to a very old friend of mine” – a reference to her husband, Charlie Brooks, the racehorse trainer and writer. Both attended Eton. He added that party leaders and prime ministers “have lunches and dinners with editors, journalists and proprietors all of the time” and he did not think “there’s a problem at all” with him attending the dinner. Cameron was quizzed about the dinner at the Oxfordshire home of the Brooks over the Christmas period on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme on Tuesday by presenter John Humphrys . The dinner was also attended by James Murdoch, the News Corp chairman and chief executive for Europe and Asia, and took place while the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, was considering whether to refer the company’s bid to acquire the 61% of Sky it did not already own to the Competition Commission on public interest grounds. It took place a few days after Cameron had stripped the business secretary, Vince Cable, of responsibility for media takeovers and given the powers to Hunt. Cable had been secretly taped by Daily Telegraph journalists saying that he was “at war” with Rupert Murdoch, the News Corp chairman and chief executive. Humphrys said a lot of people thought attending the dinner was inappropriate and asked Cameron if he wished he had not done it. “No. I’ve had absolutely nothing to do with the merger proposals that were put forward,” Cameron replied. “I deliberately excluded myself from any part of that decision-making process. The first I knew of [Hunt's decision] was when the results were announced on the BBC. “Jeremy Hunt had a quasi-judicial role to carry out, which he carried out in my view entirely properly, and it’s quite right that he didn’t consult the prime minister over that. He looked at the evidence and he made the decision and so I don’t think there’s a problem at all. “Party leaders and prime ministers have lunches and dinners with editors, journalists proprietors all of the time.” Pressed further by Humphrys, he said: “The person in question is married to a very old friend of mine. I even occasionally meet people who work for the Guardian, or the Independent, or the BBC, or whatever.” Cameron was also asked about his comments last month that parliament and not the courts should decide where the right privacy begins , in response to the rash of celebrities taking out injunctions to prevent media coverage of their private lives. The prime minister said “we should have a discussion and a debate” about the issue, but shied away from backing a new privacy law, suggesting that more could be done through the newspaper industry’s self-regulatory body, the Press Complaints Commission. “I think we should discuss what is the right way forward. I sense that there’s still more to be done to recognise that actually the Press Complaints Commission has come on a lot in recent years and we should be working with that organisation to make sure that people get the sort of protection they need, while still having a free and vibrant press,” Cameron added. “We don’t want statutory regulation of the press. By all means let’s debate it,” he said. “But I think there’s still more to be done through the Press Complaints Commission.” •

Continue reading …

Politicians are hiding their real values and intentions behind snide, loaded euphemisms While sitting at my desk performing my usual “back-office function” recently, I was struck by a story on the debate over cuts to police budgets and the likely impact on the “frontline”. Warwickshire police officers are being ordered off the beat into civilian roles as the force tries to manage its budget after the 20% cuts imposed by the coalition government. The Home Office response was familiarly blunt: forces should cut back on “bureaucracy” and “wasteful spending” while “increasing efficiency in the back office”. David Cameron weighed in the following day: there is no reason for frontline policing to be affected, he said. Sir Denis O’Connor, the chief inspector of constabulary, hit back in a report stating how important “middle-office” and “back-office” roles were in supporting “frontline” officers. All in this together, if you like. Elsewhere in austerity Britain, Hull council was being lauded by a Times leader for making “substantial savings by rationalising back-office functions and reducing the number of buildings from which it delivers services”. Eulogies were reserved for other local authorities reacting to the big cut in central funding by launching “efficiency” drives. The BBC has been caught up in the fight between government and opposition to win a spin contest over the precise terms to use when covering stories about the cuts. Savings or cuts? Here at the Guardian, we normally use cuts. It’s shorter, to the point and is a shoo-in for headline writers. Oh, and Lord Littlejohn of Maildom rants about its use. For the record, he prefers to talk about “massive waste, non-jobs and vast salaries of senior council officers”. All around us these figurative euphemisms are being trotted out by ministers defending the burden placed on the NHS, local councils and the police to protect the all-important frontline services. Get rid of the back-office staff, the thinking goes. Not quite as “unproductive” as the “feckless workshy”, the unworthy and disposable state employee has the cheek to draw a salary – paid for by “you, the taxpayer” – while easing towards retirement and, yes, a “gold-plated” pension. These invidious phrases aimed at those with lower qualifications and on lower pay are not new. “Deregulation” of the job market and enhanced “labour mobility” have long been phrases associated with the school of economic thought that implies the market will naturally find full employment and equitable wage levels as long as it remains unfettered by state legislation and intervention. Unemployed people must get on their bikes and find work or stay on the dole through “lifestyle choice”. The phrases du jour are rooted in the economic doctrine of the neoclassical orthodoxy of the 1930s – the father of Thatcher’s 1980s monetarist mayhem and grandfather of Cameron and Osborne’s supply-side wild child currently ravaging the public sector and ushering in an era of militant privatisation. They are utterances born of the strict economic theory that sees employees purely as factors of production; not human beings with occasionally irrational urges, needy families, hefty mortgages, complex relationships, myriad emotional commitments and a need for belonging, a place in society, “big” or otherwise. The longest-serving Labour prime minister in history, Tony Blair, set the current trend for euphemistic political buzzwords while masking an ideological drift to the right. “Choice”, “hard-working families”, “fairness”, “prepare for change” and “rights and responsibilities” were all key elements of New Labour’s “reform” policy agenda in health and education. Such fuzzy language was noted by George Orwell in his 1946 essay Politics and the English Language as increasingly used by politicians as a “defence of the indefensible”. For this reason, he went on: “Political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness.” Back in coalition Britain 2011, the back-office function is a prime example of Orwell’s target. The implication is that those employed in these jobs are virtually useless and their loss would be no great shame for the organisation; the reality is that unemployment can turn a person’s life upside down. There are, however, members of an organisation who no doubt do meet the criteria of vulnerability and exposure to ruthless market forces. Take the coalition ministers spouting these snide, loaded, euphemistic circumlocutions. As Anne Robinson might ask: “Who’s ‘frontline’ and who’s ‘back-office’ in this government?” Clearly Cameron, Osborne, Hunt, Gove and Pickles are out there flying the flag for “reform” while fighting the big ideological battles. Frontline, maybe. But the three most prominent Lib Dems in the coalition – Nick Clegg, Danny Alexander and Vince Cable – should perhaps think twice before using such inhuman, pejorative and invidious language. Some observers might argue they’re no more than “human shields” for the Tory generals leading the fight. So with the knife-edge AV referendum and the potentially devastating local elections just days away, the Lib Dem high-ups and ward councillors alike may be about to feel like the most disposable of team members. As for the coalition – with its stark divisions on AV increasingly apparent – who knows how the result will play out for the losers facing their party faithful? Even from my “back-office” position, I can see that Thursday’s elections might just unleash the powerful yet precise force of the political “invisible hand” as voter “rationalisation” sweeps through polling stations all around the country. Language Jamie Fahey guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Five terror arrests near Sellafield

London men stopped by officers policing nuclear site in Cumbria Five men have been arrested under the Terrorism Act near the Sellafield nuclear site in Cumbria, police said. The men were detained at 4.32pm on Monday after a vehicle was stopped and checked by officers from the Civil Nuclear Constabulary, who police the facility in west Cumbria. The five, all in their 20s and from London, were arrested under section 41 of the act and held in police custody overnight in Carlisle before being taken to Manchester on Tuesday morning, a spokesman for Cumbria police said. An investigation is now under way by the north-west counterterrorism unit. Greater Manchester police said the investigation was in its early stages and there would be no further information released immediately. They were not aware of any connection to the death of Osama bin Laden in the US special forces operation in Pakistan. The police said a road closure affected the area for “a short period of time”. UK security and terrorism Nuclear power Crime Energy Helen Carter guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …