Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 67)
NFL on Hold; Players Study Deal OK’d by Owners

The NFL was stuck in a holding pattern Friday as the players studied the owner-approved proposal to end the lockout and tried to determine when and even whether to vote on it. (July 22)

Continue reading …
No Debt Deal, But More Talks Are Possible

President Barack Obama says the biggest obstacle to a deficit-cutting deal that would allow an increase in the government’s debt limit is a large bloc of conservative House Republicans. (July 22)

Continue reading …
John Boehner Leaves Debt Ceiling Talks With Obama

WASHINGTON (AP/The Huffington Post) — House Speaker John Boehner has broken off talks with President Barack Obama on getting a budget deal to avert a government default. The Ohio Republican says the president wants to raise taxes too high and won’t make “fundamental changes” to benefit programs such as Medicare. President Obama, speaking at a press conference at the White House, told reporters that Boehner would not return his phone calls. “I’ve been left at the altar now a couple of times,” Obama said. “It is hard to understand why Speaker Boehner would walk away from this kind of deal,” Obama said. “Can they say yes to anything?” Obama called on congressional leaders to attend a meeting at the White House at 11 a.m. Saturday morning. “We have run out of time and they are going to have to explain to me how we’re going to avoid a default.” “I expect them to have an answer in terms of how they intend to get this thing done in the course of the next week. The American people expect action,” Obama said. Top GOP aides say Boehner will now work with Senate leaders on an alternative aimed at averting a market-rattling, first-ever federal default. HuffPost’s Sam Stein, Ryan Grim, and Jennifer Bendery report on why the talks fell apart: Where the two sides remained apart were on Medicaid cuts, with Republicans demanding tens of billions of dollars more in cuts than the president was comfortable making. White House officials described that difference as possible to overcome, however. The revenue component, in the end, remained unbridgeable. According to senior White House officials, each side had agreed to pass tax reform down the road that would result in $800 billion in revenue generated — the equivalent amount of savings that would be achieved if the top-end Bush tax cuts were simply allowed to expire. The administration wanted $400 billion in revenues on top of that. Republicans wanted zero, and in statements on Friday night GOP leadership aides insisted that the White House had changed the contours of the negotiations by making that demand in recent days. Obama offered to move off that $400 billion mark should GOP leadership lessen the type of cuts to entitlement programs they were demanding, White House aides said. In addition, the two sides could not figure out what to do if that aspirational tax reform package wasn’t achieved. Read more here. “It’s disappointing that the talks with the White House did not reach a favorable conclusion, and I appreciate the Speaker insisting on reduced spending and opposing the President’s call for higher taxes on American families and job creators,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in a statement. “It is similarly disappointing that the White House has refused to join Republicans in our effort to cut Washington spending now, cap runaway spending in the future and save our entitlement programs and our country from bankruptcy by requiring the nation to balance its budget. Speaker Boehner has informed us that he will work on a new path forward with Leader Reid to develop a solution that will prevent default, without job killing tax hikes, while substantially reducing Washington spending.” McConnell added, “As I’ve said before, it’s time now for the debate to move out of a room in the White House and on to the House and Senate floors where we can debate the best approach to reducing the nation’s unsustainable debt.” Friday morning, a source familiar with the negotiations told HuffPost’s Michael McAuliffe and Jennifer Bendery that he suspected the talks would eventually fail and the McConnell plan would move, shifting the unpalatable responsibility for cutting and lifting the debt cap to President Obama. “No one wants to punt until default is the only other option,” the Democratic aide said. Boehner sent the following letter to House Members and staff on Friday night: Dear Colleague, Our economy is not creating enough jobs, and the policies coming out of Washington are a big reason why. Because of Washington, we have a tax code that is stifling job creation. Because of Washington, we have a debt crisis that is sowing uncertainty and sapping the confidence of small businesses. Because of Washington, our children are financing a government spending binge that is jeopardizing their future. Since the moment I became Speaker, I’ve urged President Obama to lock arms with me and seize this moment to do something significant to address these challenges. I’ve urged him to partner with congressional Republicans to do something dramatic to change the fiscal trajectory of our country. . .something that will boost confidence in our economy, renew a measure of faith in our institutions of government, and help small businesses get back to creating jobs. The House this week passed such a plan. . .the Cut, Cap & Balance Act, which passed the House with bipartisan support. Along with Majority Leader Cantor, I have also engaged the president in a dialogue in recent days. The purpose of this dialogue was to see if we could identify a path forward that would implement the principles of Cut, Cap, & Balance in a manner that could secure bipartisan support and be signed into law. During these discussions – as in my earlier discussions – it became evident that the White House is simply not serious about ending the spending binge that is destroying jobs and endangering our children’s future. A deal was never reached, and was never really close. In the end, we couldn’t connect. Not because of different personalities, but because of different visions for our country. The president is emphatic that taxes have to be raised. As a former small businessman, I know tax increases destroy jobs. The president is adamant that we cannot make fundamental changes to our entitlement programs. As the father of two daughters, I know these programs won’t be there for their generation unless significant action is taken now. For these reasons, I have decided to end discussions with the White House and begin conversations with the leaders of the Senate in an effort to find a path forward. The Democratic leaders of the House and Senate have not been participants in the conversations I and Leader Cantor have had with the White House; nor have the Republican leaders of the Senate. But I believe there is a shared commitment on both sides of the aisle to producing legislation that will serve the best interests of our country in the days ahead – legislation that reflects the will of the American people, consistent with the principles of the Cut, Cap, & Balance Act that passed the House with bipartisan support this week. I wanted to alert you to these developments as soon as possible. Further information will be coming as soon as it is available. It is an honor to serve with you. Together, we will do everything in our power to end the spending binge in Washington and help our economy get back to creating jobs. Sincerely, John Boehner Harry Reid released the following statement Friday evening: “Republicans have once again proven unable to overcome their ideological opposition to ending taxpayer-funded giveaways for millionaires, corporate jet owners and oil companies. I applaud President Obama for insisting that any deal to reduce our deficit be balanced between cuts and revenues. We must avert a default at all costs, so it is time to reengage in bipartisan talks on an agreement that at least accomplishes that goal. I agree with President Obama that a short-term extension is unacceptable.”

Continue reading …

As expected, the Senate today blocked a House Republican bill to require Congress to slash spending and pass a balanced-budget amendment before raising the nation’s borrowing powers. The Senate defeated the Tea-Party-backed “cut, cap, and balance” measure by a vote of 51-46. The defeat comes against the backdrop of ongoing…

Continue reading …

The House must move to raise the debt ceiling by Wednesday, John Boehner told a closed House GOP meeting. First, of course, a deal must be struck, and as yet, “there is no deal. There is no agreement in private,” Boehner told the press, and leaders aren’t “close” to one….

Continue reading …
Charles Krauthammer Tells ‘Inside Washington’ Host ‘You Manage to Introduce a Hell of a Lot of Bias’

“Inside Washington” host Gordon Peterson on Friday accused Tea Party members of being out of touch with reality due to their support for the Republican “Cut, Cap, and Balance” bill as well as a balanced budget amendment. This lead Charles Krauthammer to respond, “I like the way you pose an objective question implying the insanity of a Republican proposal which passed the House…You manage to introduce a hell of a lot of bias” (video follows with transcript and commentary): GORDON PETERSON, HOST: House Republicans say they have a solution: Cut, Cap, and Balance. Tea Party folks love the idea of a Constitutional amendment to balance the budget. At what point does reality rear its ugly head with some of these people, cause it ain’t going to happen? CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I like the way you pose an objective question implying the insanity of a Republican proposal which passed the House. I just want the viewers to understand how this is a fair and balanced program. PETERSON: Well, we do our best. We don’t have the vast resources of Rupert Murdoch and Fox News, but we do the best we can. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: [Laughs] KRAUTHAMMER: I understand, but on a shoestring, you manage to introduce a hell of a lot of bias. PETERSON: Thank you very much. KRAUTHAMMER: I commend you on your… PETERSON: Can you answer my question? When does reality rear its ugly head with these people? Speaking of reality rearing its ugly head, Peterson must have missed the parts of Thursday's CNN poll finding 66 percent of respondents supporting “Cut, Cap, and Balance” and 74 percent favoring a balanced budget amendment. This is especially peculiar as Peterson later in the program referred to the CNN poll, just not the sections contradicting his depiction of Tea Partiers supporting the same things an overwhelming majority of Americans as being out of touch with reality. Maybe the limited budget PBS gives him for the program only affords him access to small portions of polls rather than the complete text every other person can access for free via the internet.

Continue reading …
20 Democrats Said They Supported a Balanced Budget – They Lied (Video)

The Club for Growth released this video showing 20 sitting Democrats saying they supported a balanced budget. Of course, they lied. Senate democrats this morning rejected the House budget that included a balanced budget provision. Dem leader Harry Reid said … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 21/07/2011 22:17 Number of articles : 3

Continue reading …

As we expected, another part of this debt ceiling farce is over. It doesn’t matter if the vote was a straight party-line vote because Republicans want to play to their base. The Senate on Friday rejected a House plan to substantially cut government spending and raise the federal debt limit contingent on a balanced budget proposal, leaving Congress up in the air about how to resolve its impasse over the federal debt ceiling and avoid a government default. Senators voted 51 to 46 along party lines to set aside the measure, known as the “cut, cap and balance” bill , which was sent to the Senate by the House this week and seen by conservative House members as their preferred option for increasing the debt ceiling. For many House Republicans, the legislation was their best offer in the continuing standoff with President Obama and Congressional Democrats. Now there’s a lot of blathering going on about Boehner and Obama cutting a major deal. I’ve heard from sources that this is inaccurate and then you hear it in reports that it’s on. John Boehner has denied that he has a deal with Obama: Now that the House debt plan is dead , lawmakers need to come up with another path for raising the debt limit. And at today’s press conference, John Boehner continued his denial that he’d reached a plan with Obama: But before departing, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), ever sensitive to the needs of his conservative caucus, told reporters, there was “never an agreement,” with President Obama to raise the debt limit. “Frankly,” he said, “[we're] not close to an agreement.” The Washington Post has reported they are negotiating: Obama, Boehner pursue a deal as Democrats fume President Obama and House Speaker John A. Boehner rushed Thursday to strike agreement on a far-reaching plan to reduce the national debt but faced a revolt from Democrats furious that the accord appeared to include no immediate provision to raise taxes. With 12 days left until the Treasury begins to run short of cash, Obama and Boehner (R-Ohio) were still pursuing the most ambitious plan to restrain the national debt in at least 20 years. Talks focused on sharp cuts in agency spending and politically painful changes to cherished health and retirement programs aimed at saving roughly $3 trillion over the next decade. More savings would be generated through an overhaul of the tax code that would lower personal and corporate income tax rates while eliminating or reducing an array of popular tax breaks, such as the deduction for home mortgage interest. But the talks envisioned no specific tax increases as part of legislation to lift the debt limit, and the tax rewrite would be postponed until next year. Democrats reacted with outrage as word filtered to Capitol Hill, saying the emerging agreement appeared to violate their pledge not to cut Social Security and Medicare benefits as well as Obama’s promise not to make deep cuts in programs for the poor without extracting some tax concessions from the rich. When “we heard these reports of these mega-trillion-dollar cuts with no revenues, it was like Mount Vesuvius. . . . Many of us were volcanic,” said Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) . White House budget director Jacob J. Lew denied that a deal without taxes was in the works. “We’ve been clear revenues have to be part of any agreement,” he told reporters. I did hear Obama say that there had to be a balanced approach to a debt-ceiling deal during his Town Hall meeting this morning. Harry Reid seemed to be upset as well, and had this to say: After the vote, Senator Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat and majority leader, said the Senate was for the moment abandoning its fallback plan and would not immediately move ahead with a procedural maneuver proposed by Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky to increase the debt limit. He said the Senate would instead await the results of negotiations between Mr. Obama and the House speaker, John A. Boehner of Ohio, over a broad deficit reduction package. “The path to avert default now runs through the House of Representatives,” Mr. Reid said after Democrats voted against the House plan. He said that he was canceling plans to keep the Senate in session over the weekend and that lawmakers would instead reconvene Monday, just more than a week before the Aug. 2 deadline set by the Treasury Department for increasing the $14.3 trillion limit I’m totally against cuts in our safety net programs — especially to get a debt ceiling vote done. Now it’s being reported Reid confronted Jack Lew over the Obama/Bohener reports: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) confronted White House budget director Jack Lew during a Thursday afternoon meeting about secret talks on a deficit-reduction deal between the president and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). “I’m the Senate majority leader — why don’t I know about this deal?” Reid demanded as soon as the budget director walked into the historic Mansfield Room for a meeting with Senate Democrats, according to a lawmaker who witnessed the exchange. Lew shot back: “If there’s a deal, then the president doesn’t know about it, the vice president doesn’t know about it and I don’t know about it.” A Senate Democratic aide confirmed the exchange took place. Democrats were outraged about reports that Obama was willing to accept major spending cuts in exchange for reforming the tax code at some point in the future as part of a deal to raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling. Reid and other Democrats warned the administration officials in the meeting that they might not support a deal between Obama and Boehner if kept out of the loop. “It was a heated session,” said a senior Democratic senator who attended the lunch. “There’s a basic lack of trust with the president.” Kabuki rules. And as predicted, the Villager position on “Shared Sacrifice” is big on working people doing all the sharing and all the sacrificing too.

Continue reading …

Sam and Diane. Ross and Rachel. And now the latest “will-they-or-won’t-they?” couple seems to be President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner. After speculation renewed yesterday that they were working on a deal, the New York Times maintains a deal is close, while the USA Today says both sides are…

Continue reading …
At Least 1 Dead in Fiery NY Crash

A truck driver is dead and at least 20 people were hurt after a tractor-trailer collided with a tour bus heading from Canada to New York City. The crash in Waterloo, New York happened in the eastbound lanes of I-90. (July 22)

Continue reading …