Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 69)
Why Does The Corporate Media Ignore the GOP’s Un-American Pledge To Grover Norquist, An Enemy of the Constitution?

Grover Norquist makes a fool of himself in this November 2008 discussion about raising taxes to prevent a recession. Dear Media Types and/or Journalists, I know a lot of you read our little blog, so I want to ask you a question: Why won’t you cover the story that an unelected Republican tax czar demands that Republicans sign an anti-tax pledge that supercedes their oath of office , enforces it through coercion, intimidation and threats, and has this country’s political system and the very economy in a state of crisis? Why do you accept the idea that this is somehow perfectly normal, even okay? Here’s how Ed at Gin and Tacos put it : Let’s say that through a combination of fund-raising prowess, ideological militancy, and personal charisma, Jesse Jackson Sr. is able to assume a position of considerable behind-the-scenes power in the Democratic Party. His sway over elected Democrats is such that he manages to get 95% of the Democratic Congressional delegation, House and Senate, to sign an oath of personal loyalty to his policy goals. Specifically, they pledge that under no circumstances will they ever support cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and other social welfare programs. Jackson believes that any such cuts will affect the poor and people of color disproportionately. Throughout the debate over the budget and debt ceiling, House and Senate Democrats refuse to even consider any proposal that touches any of those programs. It is a non-starter. Full stop. Because they swore an oath to Jesse Jackson that they wouldn’t. I’m sure you can see through this thin shoe-on-the-other-partisan-foot analogy to  Grover Norquist’s “Taxpayer Protection Pledge” that currently holds sway over the GOP . I do think it’s interesting to draw out the hypothetical scenario, though, to underscore a point: Can you even imagine the sheer violence of the pant-s****g that the GOP, Teatards, and Beltway media would be engaged in if the shoe really  was on the other foot? If every Democrat had signed a  personal oath to an interest group and private citizen that took precedence over their oath to the American people and Constitution? You know, I think Ed makes a really good point. I don’t think you guys can credibly defend yourself on that one. Here’s the oath of office each congress member and senator takes: “I, Joe Blow, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic ; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same ; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Okay, let’s start with this. They take an oath to “support and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” This is from the 14th Amendment: The validity of the public debt of the United States , authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned . So thanks to unelected GOP czar Grover Norquist and the oath he insists Republicans sign (235 congressmen and 41 senators from this Congress) under threat of a high-powered primary challenge, the elected members of Congress and the Senate have declared that their pledge to him takes precedence over their obligation to the Constitution and their responsibility to discharge their duties. Don’t you think that’s a little, well, unAmerican? Not to mention against the very spirit of our constitution? I’ve seen more profiles of Grover lately, but something important is missing from most of them. You’re supposed to be journalists . You’re supposed to sound alarms, afflict the comfortable. Why aren’t you doing your jobs? Here’s a puppeteer who pulls the strings and intimidates elected offices. He’s an unelected, unaccountable sleazebag who’s taking money from the right wing for his anti-Constitution, unAmerican agenda. And he’s destroying our government, just as he threatened to do from the beginning. enlarge Instead of describing what he does, why aren’t you questioning the very premise , like Garry Wills did in the New York Review of Books? …Edmund Burke, standing for election to Parliament in 1774, addressed the electors of his district, Bristol. The idea of instructions had been raised in the campaign, leading Burke to renounce their “coercive authority”: Certainly, gentlemen, it ought to be the happiness and glory of a representative to live in the strictest union, the closest correspondence, and the most unreserved communication with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinion, high respect; their business, unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice his repose, his pleasure, his satisfactions, to theirs; and above all, ever, and in all cases, to prefer their interest to his own. But his unbiased opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened conscience, he ought not to sacrifice to you, to any man, or to any set of men living . These he does not derive from your pleasure; no, nor from the law and the constitution. They are a trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he is deeply answerable. Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion. Burke makes clear what the real meaning of the Norquist pledge is for those who subscribe to it. They are signing over their souls. This first oath they take, as candidates, makes the next one they take, as office holders—the oath to preserve and protect the Constitution—an empty gesture. That oath, sworn to God, may call for changes of position in a crisis or where better knowledge has become available. They cannot preserve and protect the country if their hands are tied and their minds closed. Their participation in congressional discussion, if that discussion affects taxes in any way, becomes a charade. This is the situation Burke denounced: What sort of reason is that, in which the determination precedes the discussion; in which one set of men deliberate, and another decide; and where those who form the conclusion are perhaps three hundred miles distant from those who hear the arguments… Authoritative instructions; mandates issued, which the member is bound blindly and implicitly to obey, to vote and to argue for, though contrary to the clearest conviction of his judgment and conscience – these are things utterly unknown to the laws of this land . That means that most Republicans in Congress have signed a Mephistophelian pact. They have left behind their consciences in the pocket of Grover Norquist. Bill Clinton said this recently : “He was quoted in the paper the other day saying he gave Republican senators permission … on getting rid of the ethanol subsidies. I thought, ‘My God, what has this country come to when one person has to give you permission to do what’s best for the country.’ It was chilling.” Grover, of course, said it was taken out of context. But you all know how he works. If some other dreadful plague was threatening this country, the media would be sounding the alarm. But on this issue? You’re strangely silent. There are many things in this world that, while legal, remain strongly immoral. Instead of covering Anthony Weiner’s online habits, why weren’t you covering this? Our readers tell us this is why they don’t trust the media. Look in the mirror. This man is destroying our democracy, and if you’re not pointing that out every day, you’re complicit.

Continue reading …

DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz told Wolf Blitzer on CNN that Rep. Allen West had not apologized for his outrageous behavior, which he sealed in a letter. BLITZER: Now there’s reports out there as of this moment that he called you and apologized. SCHULTZ: That is absolutely untrue. I have not received an apology. I haven’t received a phone call. I know he has my e-mail, I haven’t got an apology on my e-mail nor on my fax machine in my district office or my congressional office in the Capitol or at the Democratic National Committee. BLITZER: He’s quoted in this Roll Call as having told a “Huffington Post” reporter, ‘I just apologized.’ SCHULTZ: That’s simply not true. A Huff Post reporter asked West about his sexist and sophomoric attack against Rep. Schultz, and he claimed that he did apologize . Following Rep. Allen West’s (R-FL) tirade yesterday against Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), the Tea Party Republican told the Huffington Post that he had “ just apologized ” to his fellow Floridian this afternoon. Wasserman Schultz told CNN this afternoon, however, that reports of West apologizing to her were “absolutely untrue.” Allen West never did formally apologize to her. Let’s face it, he would never have behaved like this to another man in Congress. Roll Call breaks it down: The Allen West Apology Mystery Did he or didn’t he? Shortly after Roll Call reported Wednesday afternoon that Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.) said that he had apologized to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) for calling her “vile, unprofessional and despicable” in an email, the phones started ringing off the hook. Wasserman Schultz aides said there had been no apology, and West’s office adamantly denied the report and demanded a retraction. So, what exactly happened? West said, “I just apologized,” when asked by a Huffington Post reporter about the situation in the Speaker’s Lobby before votes Wednesday afternoon, according to a tape of the conversation. The Huffington Post reporter repeated the question later, asking about it in the context of a group of female lawmakers preparing to hold a news conference to condemn him. The Members planned to call on the leadership of both parties to rebuke West. In response to the question, West reiterated that he had apologized before walking into the House chamber. But West spokeswoman Angela Sachitano doubled down, saying it was Wasserman Schultz who should do the apologizing. Sachitano strenuously denied that West had apologized to Wasserman Schultz and even denied what he’d told Huffington Post… read on His people even lie about what West said to the Huffington Post. CNN Transcript via The Situation Room below the fold: Wow. Have you ever been attacked publicly like that? SCHULTZ: No, and I was surprised that he sent that to my personal e-mail, an e-mail that he didn’t previously have. But it’s — you know, it doesn’t faze me. I mean, it isn’t surprising he would react to the probably untold pressure he’s getting from his constituents. I mean, he and I both represent, as I pointed out in debate on the House floor, represent thousands of senior citizens who under this cut, cap and balance — really, duck dodge and dismantle — plan that the Republicans have proposed would face huge increases in their Medicare costs. It would end Medicare as we know it. It’s the Ryan plan on steroids. And he clearly is feeling the pressure. If he can’t handle that pressure, can’t handle being called out in debate on the House floor, then he probably should change his position. And, you know, he also suggested that I focus on my own congressional district. I’ll point out that I was. He’s a constituent of mine, and so I was dutifully doing my job and representing my constituents and taking to task someone who I think is really taking the wrong position when it comes to the people we represent in south Florida who badly need that safety net and make sure that we’re not going to dramatically increase their costs, which that cut, cap and balance plan does. BLITZER: So you’re saying he lives in your district, he doesn’t live in his own district? SCHULTZ: Yes, Congressman West is a constituent of the 20th congressional district, but represents the 22cd. BLITZER: Now there’s reports out there as of this moment that he called you and apologized. SCHULTZ: That is absolutely untrue. I have not received an apology. I haven’t received a phone call. I know he has my e-mail, I haven’t got an apology on my e-mail nor on my fax machine in my district office or my congressional office in the Capitol or at the Democratic National Committee. BLITZER: He’s quoted in this roll call as having told a “Huffington Post” reporter, I just apologized. SCHULTZ: That’s simply not true. BLITZER: As of this moment, he has not called you, he has not communicated — he has not apologized? SCHULTZ: No, he has not. BLITZER: If he does call you and say I’m sorry, what will you say? SCHULTZ: Well, I would appreciate his apology, and I would hope that he would reconsider his ill-advised position on increasing benefits — increasing costs for Medicare beneficiaries. But I think Congressman West really needs to understand that when we’re debating on the House floor, that’s what we do. We engage in a back and forth. And if he can’t handle that, particularly on an issue as important to our constituents as Medicare, then he probably needs to reconsider his really ill-advised position on Medicare.

Continue reading …
Libyan rebels in Zlitan capture key government commander

General Abdul Nabih Zayid arrested during rebel advance and questioned over Misrata civilian killings, says opposition Libyan rebels in Misrata say they have captured the chief of operations of government forces in Zlitan on the first day of their offensive against the town. General Abdul Nabih Zayid was caught late on Wednesday after advancing fighters overran his command post at Souk Talat, a small village on the outskirts of Zlitan, opposition commanders said. “We have him in custody. He is being well looked after,” said Mohamed Frefr, in charge of detainees for the rebels. “After three days talking with him we will hand him to the military prison.” Rebels in the besieged coastal city said the general was being interviewed by intelligence officers and well looked after, with supplies of insulin procured because he has diabetes. A member of the Misrata Military Council, Hassan Duwa, said the general was captured as rebel units advanced towards Zlitan late on Wednesday. “He was in his house, 11 guys surrounded the house.” His capture is regarded as a major feather in the cap for rebel forces. The general gained notoriety among rebels when he helped co-ordinate the deployment of tanks into the streets of Misrata in March, triggering two months of street fighting that saw much of the city wrecked and hundreds killed. Misrata’s war crimes investigators say the general, who was operations officer at the city garrison before the war, is a “person of interest” for his role in what they say were widespread and systematic attacks against civilians. Khalid Alwafi, a lawyer for Misrata’s Human Rights Activists Association, made up of volunteer Libyan lawyers, which is assembling evidence it hopes can later be used by the international criminal court, said: “For sure we need to interview him. There are lots of questions that need answers from him.” Rebel units say they are on the outskirts of Zlitan and deploying around the town. The offensive has been launched simultaneously with a push by forces on the eastern front to capture the key oil town of Brega. Both offensives have been augmented by heavy Nato air strikes over the past few days, with alliance aircraft flying over Misrata on Wednesday night. Loud explosions could be heard from behind the frontline. In a sign that government forces may be feeling the strain, Libya’s state television channel on Thursday morning broadcast an appeal for volunteers to join the army. An announcer told viewers there were vacancies in all units, including special forces, and that soldiers would be well paid. Several rebel commanders in Misrata have told the Guardian in recent days that pro-Gaddafi forces are running short of manpower. The twin attacks are as much political as military, with the rebel National Transitional Council, based in Benghazi, keen to demonstrate that it can break a six-week deadlock and gain the initiative. Libya Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Africa Chris Stephen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Open Thread: Could the Senate Pass Cut, Cap, and Balance?

After the House passed the Cut, Cap, and Balance act Tuesday evening with the support of five Democrats, Sen. Jim DeMint is circulating a Club for Growth video with 20 prominent Democrat senators previously announcing support for a balanced budget amendment in hopes of swaying their votes this weekend. Do you think any of these Democrats will maintain support for such an amendment? Check out the video after the break, and let us know your thoughts in the comments. The video, which includes the likes of Sen. Chuck Schumer, Sen. Dick Durbin, and Sen. Harry Reid, is meant to prove the bipartisan support behind a balanced budget amendment. According to ABC , while the chances are slim that the Senate would pass the bill, Senate Republicans are still looking forward to debating it. The Senate will hold a cloture vote on the motion to proceed this Saturday on the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act which the House of Representatives passed last night. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV., announced on the Senate floor this evening that the vote will occur on Saturday morning, but that he still “hopes” that a deal could be worked out to vote sooner. Senate Minority Leader McConnell, R-KY., took to the floor immediately after and said that he welcomes a debate over Cut, Cap and Balance and that he is looking forward to a Saturday vote. Do you think any of these Senate Democrats will hold their promises? Or do you think that their past vocal support was insincere? If Cut, Cap, and Balance did pass the Senate, do you think President Obama would sign it into law?

Continue reading …
Former Guantánamo inmate David Hicks faces fight to keep book profits

Australian prosecutors take action to seize profits of Guantanamo, My Journey under ‘proceeds of crime’ law Australian prosecutors have begun legal action to seize book profits from the former Guantánamo Bay inmate David Hicks, who was convicted of terrorism offences at a US military tribunal. Random House published Hicks’s book, Guantanamo, My Journey, last year. It is based on his time at Guantánamo Bay from 2001 until 2007. Under Australian law, a person cannot gain commercial benefit from a crime. This can prevent criminals receiving payment for writing books about their offences. A spokeswoman for the Commonwealth director of public prosecutions said Hicks had been served orders on Wednesday and that the case was set for 3 August in the New South Wales state supreme court. Hicks’s book has reportedly sold 30,000 copies, regarded as “solid” sales for a hardcover book in Australia. As a rule of thumb, an author can expect around 10% of sales, with Hicks’s book having a recommended price of A$49.95 (£33). Hicks was captured in Afghanistan in late 2001 and spent five years in Guantánamo before pleading guilty to supporting terrorism and becoming the first person convicted by the war crimes tribunals the US created to try non-American captives. Law professor Clive Williams said Australia’s “proceeds of crime” law favoured the prosecution, but Hicks may use the court case to publicly raise issues over his conviction. “He may well raise issues going to the nature of his plea, whether duress was involved, whether it was a plea that should be recognised under the Australian legal system,” Williams, from the University of New South Wales, told local radio. “For David Hicks to defeat the claim, the attempt to seize those assets, he will have to raise questions that go to the heart of his conviction.” Hicks, a former kangaroo skinner, admitted training with al-Qaida and meeting its then leader Osama bin Laden, whom he described as “lovely”, according to police evidence given to the US military court. Hicks returned to Australia in 2007 as part of his guilty plea, which also included a one-year gag order. Another Australian, Mamdouh Habib, was released from Guantánamo without charge in 2005. Australia, a close US ally, was an original member of the US-led coalition that invaded Iraq in 2003 and Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001 airliner attacks. Australia Guantánamo Bay Cuba Autobiography and memoir Biography United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former Guantánamo inmate David Hicks faces fight to keep book profits

Australian prosecutors take action to seize profits of Guantanamo, My Journey under ‘proceeds of crime’ law Australian prosecutors have begun legal action to seize book profits from the former Guantánamo Bay inmate David Hicks, who was convicted of terrorism offences at a US military tribunal. Random House published Hicks’s book, Guantanamo, My Journey, last year. It is based on his time at Guantánamo Bay from 2001 until 2007. Under Australian law, a person cannot gain commercial benefit from a crime. This can prevent criminals receiving payment for writing books about their offences. A spokeswoman for the Commonwealth director of public prosecutions said Hicks had been served orders on Wednesday and that the case was set for 3 August in the New South Wales state supreme court. Hicks’s book has reportedly sold 30,000 copies, regarded as “solid” sales for a hardcover book in Australia. As a rule of thumb, an author can expect around 10% of sales, with Hicks’s book having a recommended price of A$49.95 (£33). Hicks was captured in Afghanistan in late 2001 and spent five years in Guantánamo before pleading guilty to supporting terrorism and becoming the first person convicted by the war crimes tribunals the US created to try non-American captives. Law professor Clive Williams said Australia’s “proceeds of crime” law favoured the prosecution, but Hicks may use the court case to publicly raise issues over his conviction. “He may well raise issues going to the nature of his plea, whether duress was involved, whether it was a plea that should be recognised under the Australian legal system,” Williams, from the University of New South Wales, told local radio. “For David Hicks to defeat the claim, the attempt to seize those assets, he will have to raise questions that go to the heart of his conviction.” Hicks, a former kangaroo skinner, admitted training with al-Qaida and meeting its then leader Osama bin Laden, whom he described as “lovely”, according to police evidence given to the US military court. Hicks returned to Australia in 2007 as part of his guilty plea, which also included a one-year gag order. Another Australian, Mamdouh Habib, was released from Guantánamo without charge in 2005. Australia, a close US ally, was an original member of the US-led coalition that invaded Iraq in 2003 and Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001 airliner attacks. Australia Guantánamo Bay Cuba Autobiography and memoir Biography United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Rick Baron Remembered (Boy, Did He Ever)

The “fab five” of Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory, as profiled on “60 Minutes” — Bob Petrella, Brad Williams, Rick Baron, Marilu Henner, Louise Owen. PHOTO: Nan Collett According to Wikipedia, notable people who have died on July 15 through the years include John Lennon’s mother, Julia (1958), actor and game-show host Bert Convy (1991), and fashion designer Gianni Versace (1997). Someone should add Rick Baron to that list, following his passing this past Friday at the age of 53. It would be fitting, because Rick was exceptionally good at recalling when people died. The first time I met him, he rattled off when all the major cast members of “The Wizard Of Oz” had died, as well as the dates of the deaths of the Three Stooges. And not just the big Stooges. He could tell you about Joe Besser and Joe De Rita, too. Rick Baron, of Cleveland, was case study No. 3 in the research being conducted by the University of California – Irvine into what they are calling “highly superior autobiographical memory” (HSAM). The people in their study can remember the events of their lives with remarkable detail, pinning even mundane occurrences, like what they ate or what they watched on television to specific dates and days of the week. After publication of Irvine’s findings on their initial subject in 2006, my brother Brad became their second case study, and I documented that process and the unlikely notoriety which followed in my film, Unforgettable. Rick became part of the research in 2007, after Rick’s sister learned of Irvine’s study on the Internet, something Rick couldn’t have done on his own. He seemed to take pride in his lack of knowledge of computers, his non-ownership of a cell phone, his general Luddite-ity. If he was out of the house, you could leave a message on his answering machine, with its tinny cassette tapes that tended to make the incoming caller sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher. He learned the old-fashioned way, from books and newspapers and magazines, and all the information he needed seemed to be stored and easily retrievable in his brain. If he’d heard it once, he would forever remember your phone number or your birthday. He could tell you the exact dates on which he’d previously spoken to you. I’m sure I’d have found all this astonishing if I hadn’t grown up around my brother and his similar abilities. The woman whose memory launched the Irvine research has shown little interest in meeting the others being studied, but Rick eagerly reached out to Brad, happy to have found another person who shared this rare talent. Rick was also delighted to talk to me and to our other brother, Greg, calling us frequently. He was stunned that we didn’t have this same type of memory and was certain that he could teach us how to remember this way if we gave him half an hour. He just couldn’t conceive that something which came so easily to him could be so elusive to the rest of us. Rick liked to talk. To call him “garrulous” was an understatement. As Groucho Marx would say, Rick must have been vaccinated with a phonograph needle. My first phone call with Rick lasted roughly an hour, the last half of which was punctuated with umpteen iterations of “Just one more thing and I’ll let you go.” Not only was Rick’s mind stuffed with information, those torrents of facts were positively bursting forth. He was a gusher of knowledge, and he was determined to let it all out before he let you go. In December 2008, Brad and I drove to Cleveland to shoot the climax of my documentary, the first-ever face-to-face encounter between two HSAM-ers. The contrast between Brad and Rick was dramatic, with Brad as low-key and deliberate as Rick was boisterous and explosive. For several hours, Brad and Rick compared notes but mostly compared memories, using this historic opportunity not to share any great insights about the processes of the human mind, which the rest of us could never comprehend, but to bombard each other with bits of date-centric trivia from their shared pop-culture recollections, trying to discover if the other had managed to store up the same obscure minutiae about “Petticoat Junction” and “Top Cat.” What happened on TV in the 60s loomed large for these two baby boomers. Rick asked Brad what was the big event on Friday, November 5, 1965. Brad somehow knew that it was the wedding on “The Farmer’s Daughter.” Brad challenged Rick to tell him what happened on September 15, 1965. Rick could barely contain himself, effusively declaring that to be “one of the most famous days!” as it marked the premiere date of the TV series “Gidget,” “Lost In Space,” “Green Acres” and “F Troop.” A later visit to the Internet Movie Database confirmed that as the debut date for the first three, but not for “F Troop.” While editing the footage, I discovered that Rick didn’t stand up 100 percent to rigorous fact-checking. In the face of such an overwhelming barrage of assertions, the vast majority of them correct, it was easy to assume that he must be right about everything — and certainly easier than to stop and double-check them all. Maybe, in the rush of facts tumbling through his lips, he didn’t take sufficient time to ponder the accuracy of everything he said. Or maybe, sometimes, he hadn’t learned the correct fact in the first place, so his brain was accurately recalling a piece of inaccurate information. At any rate, he followed up a few minutes later by excitedly informing Brad that, the day before (September 14, 1965), “My Mother The Car” had premiered. And he was right about that. A year after that first encounter, Rick and Brad were reunited in California, along with three more participants in the HSAM research — Bob Petrella, Louise Owen and Marilu Henner — to be profiled for “60 Minutes.” In this more controlled environment, with a professional camera crew looming about, things weren’t quite as free-wheeling and exhausting as they had been in Rick’s living room in Cleveland, but when Lesley Stahl would throw out a date to the five “memory superstars,”all would pounce, each wanting to prove their memory was just as ludicrously efficient as the others’. Not only did all five have distinctively different personalities, none of the five even experienced this type of memory in precisely the same way. Although certain areas of their brains do appear to be substantially larger than in an ordinary brain, the research has not yet conclusively indicated how or why their memories work the way they do. (As a result of the “60 Minutes” exposure, the pool of case studies has now reportedly expanded to twenty. If you think you may have this type of memory, or know someone who might, you can contact the UC-Irvine researchers at ultramem@uci.edu.) Rick had used his remarkable memory to win prizes in trivia contests but otherwise had difficulty putting his abilities to practical use. He didn’t view his memory as a curse or a hindrance and was looking forward to the opportunities that his newfound celebrity might bring him. He appeared on the “Today” show on the same day Brad was being interviewed by Regis and Kelly, and he was profiled for a show on the Discovery Health channel, “Plastic Fantastic Brain.” He talked of performing his memory act on cruise ships and took meetings with Hollywood agents about building a quiz show around him. In his living room in 2008, he had told us, “I live for the future, and hopefully a more exciting life.” Around the time that the “60 Minutes” piece aired in December 2010, Rick learned that he had cancer. In my final phone conversation with Rick in May, he had just finished aggressive chemotherapy but said the cancer was in remission and he was continuing to talk about what he might do when he recovered. Unfortunately, he lost his battle last Friday — two months to the day after our last conversation (as Rick would have been the first to point out, if he’d had the chance). Near the end of the night in Cleveland back in 2008, I asked Rick if he had thought of donating his brain to science. At the time, he didn’t want to discuss the matter: “Let’s use it while I’m still living as opposed to worrying about it when I’m dead.” I don’t know if he ever gave the issue any further thought, but I’m sure the researchers in Irvine have already learned a great deal from studying Rick Baron and his remarkable mind. So long, Rick. Thanks for the memories.

Continue reading …
House Republicans Show Up Outside of White House Demanding Written Proposal on Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media The kabuki theater from House Republican freshman on raising the debt limit continues — GOP congressmen show up at White House, want plan : While President Obama and Congressional GOP leaders continue to negotiate a debt ceiling deal behind the scenes, several House Republican freshmen are growing impatient. Nearly 20 of them ventured to the gates of the White House Tuesday with a letter in hand to the president demanding the he immediately deliver Congress a written proposal to raise the debt ceiling. “Given the significance of our debt-driven crisis and the historic importance of the negotiations, we believe it is imperative that the work towards any agreement be as transparent as possible so that American people have a chance for careful evaluation of the process free from political posturing,” the members wrote in the letter. Rep. Tom Reed, who led the freshman lawmakers to the White House, told reporters the group doesn’t care if opposing a debt ceiling increase harms their reelection chances. “We don’t care about reelection,” he said. “We felt it was incumbent to come to the White House because this is a critical issue.” Members of the group added they will not agree to any debt ceiling proposal unless there are detailed spending cuts and timelines involved. Apparently they don’t think their leader John Boehner is capable of negotiating for them if they’re pulling stunts like this.

Continue reading …
House Republicans Show Up Outside of White House Demanding Written Proposal on Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media The kabuki theater from House Republican freshman on raising the debt limit continues — GOP congressmen show up at White House, want plan : While President Obama and Congressional GOP leaders continue to negotiate a debt ceiling deal behind the scenes, several House Republican freshmen are growing impatient. Nearly 20 of them ventured to the gates of the White House Tuesday with a letter in hand to the president demanding the he immediately deliver Congress a written proposal to raise the debt ceiling. “Given the significance of our debt-driven crisis and the historic importance of the negotiations, we believe it is imperative that the work towards any agreement be as transparent as possible so that American people have a chance for careful evaluation of the process free from political posturing,” the members wrote in the letter. Rep. Tom Reed, who led the freshman lawmakers to the White House, told reporters the group doesn’t care if opposing a debt ceiling increase harms their reelection chances. “We don’t care about reelection,” he said. “We felt it was incumbent to come to the White House because this is a critical issue.” Members of the group added they will not agree to any debt ceiling proposal unless there are detailed spending cuts and timelines involved. Apparently they don’t think their leader John Boehner is capable of negotiating for them if they’re pulling stunts like this.

Continue reading …
Sen. Al Franken Destroys Focus On The Family’s Tom Minnery during DOMA hearing

Thanks again to Igor Volsky of Think Progress LGBT for this gem. Watch Sen. Al Franken destroy Focus On The Family’s Tom Minnery by… …demonstrating how Minnery misrepresented an HHS study. The study – which Minnery cited to oppose marriage equality – actually found that children do best in two-parent households, regardless of the parents’ gender. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Pam’s House Blend Discovery Date : 20/07/2011 17:42 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …