Click here to view this media Heather has already talked about the right’s revisionist history around Thanksgiving that cropped up this year, but the story isn’t complete without discussing Rush Limbaugh’s sneering attack on President Obama’s Thanksgiving proclamation : Every cliche that is wrong about Thanksgiving shows up in his proclamation. The Pilgrims show up at Plymouth. The Indians had been there for thousands of years. We get off the boats. We don’t know how to feed ourselves. The Indians show us how. They shared their skill in agriculture, which helped the early colonists survive and whose rich culture continues to add to our nation’s Heritage. Is it possible he believes it? I don’t doubt that he believes it, and even if he doesn’t believe it, he wants everybody else to believe it. Obama believes that this nation is fatally flawed since its founding, even before its founding, so it stands to reason — you know, a lot of people did not hear the true story of Thanksgiving until I wrote it in my book in the early nineties. I can remember Snerdley and H.R. were stunned when they heard the first story of Thanksgiving, the real story, because we’d all been taught a variation of the Indians saved us. We had to draw pictures of it in school, that’s exactly right, art projects of the Indians saving us. Well, that would be because they actually did save us — largely through teaching white settlers agricultural techniques: Time and familiarity has reduced to quaint memory the crucial nature of Indian agriculture for white settlers on the Atlantic coast early in the seventeenth century. Every American school child can recite the story of Squanto and his service to the Pilgrims at Plymouth. It is a charming incident in our historical texts culminating in a grand feast of thanksgiving. The harsh reality of the time, as William Bradford well knew and recorded, inscribed a bleaker circumstance. Without the seed corn and beans Bradford’s fellow adventurers unearthed in November 1620, survival of the colony was doubtful. Without Squanto to teach them the arts of New World agriculture the Pilgrims’ future was likely to be short indeed. The settlers’ failure to master Squanto’s teaching forced the colony to rely on food supplies purchased from successful Indian farmers. Not until the second year did the Pilgrims’ own fields produce in sufficient abundance to assure survival. To the south, in Virginia, the Jamestown settlement had already benefited from Indian agriculture. On at least two occasions the imperial chieftain, Powhatan, provided Jamestown with sufficient food to stave off disaster. The Jamestown settlers and later commentators seldom understood Powhatan’s motivation and apparent inconstancy toward the settlement. A broader view of the chief’s effort to establish an empire in the Chesapeake area might shed some light on the seeming enigma, but for the Englishmen at Jamestown the fact that lie came and with food was enough. To the good fortune of Plymouth and Jamestown the coastal Indians produced food in quantity. The coastal tribes’ ability to feed themselves and the white settlements belied the popular conception of Indian agriculture in that region as bare subsistence. Indeed, where investigators have explored the question a different picture emerged. In southern New England at least, Indian agriculture accounted for over 65 percent of the native population’s diet and surplus production for trade and storage was common. In any event, it did not take the Plymouth colony long to discover that their gift from the Indians had a value beyond feeding the settlement. Within four years after their arrival at Plymouth settlers profited from Indian agriculture and entered into relationships that dominated Indian-white contacts for the next two hundred years and more. In the fall of 1625 Governor William Bradford sent a boatload of corn up the Kennebec River to trade with the interior tribes for furs. His men returned with a store of beaver and other furs that financed the colony’s needs for the next year. In later years Massachusetts further developed its fur trade, raised its own corn for export, and purchased corn from the Indians for resale. You can also read William Bradford’s eyewitness account for more. Now it is true that Bradford’s account also details how the Pilgrims discovered that communal farming was a distinctly inferior scheme to private farming, which is where Stossel and Limbaugh obtain their claim that the first Thanksgiving was about the failure of socialism — which, as Brian at RightWingWatch has detailed already, is a load of bollocks and a deliberate misreading of the history. As Digby says : At this point it’s clear that according to Rush, there’s literally nothing good you can say about a racial minority in America (unless they are dutifully serving as right wing poster children.) Of course not. Because in Rushtopia, white people are the cream of creation, and any suggestion that their inferiors might actually have helped them survive and thrive is an outrageous slander upon the race.
Continue reading …What are we to make of the recent outburst of aggression between the two Koreas? And while we’re on the subject of puzzling moments in international diplomacy, what exactly is America’s goal in Afghanistan? Related Entries November 24, 2010 More News, Less Turkey November 19, 2010 ‘Left, Right & Center’: Bad-Touched by TSA
Continue reading …Credit: Justin Fox ( Click to enlarge .) Despite a decade of Bush tax cut windfalls for the wealthy pushing income inequality to levels not seen since 1929, Republicans are calling for another $700 billion, 10-year payday for the richest Americans. So it should come as no surprise that as corporate profits reached an all-time record in the third quarter, leading voices in the Republican Party want their tax bill slashed , too. As the New York Times reported Tuesday, happy days are indeed here again for corporate America: “American businesses earned profits at an annual rate of $1.659 trillion in the third quarter, according to a Commerce Department report released Tuesday. That is the highest figure recorded since the government began keeping track over 60 years ago, at least in nominal or noninflation-adjusted terms.” Those numbers should be taken with a grain of salt . Having slashed costs and reaped the benefits of big productivity gains at this early stage of the recovery, U.S. firms are sitting on a mountain of cash. But even expressed as a percentage of American gross domestic product , corporate profits are returning to the 9.5% range enjoyed in 2006: Nevertheless, the leading lights of the Republican Party are calling for a rollback in corporate tax rates . Last week, Texas Congressman and terror baby foe Louie Gohmert decried the “insidious” tax of American business and demanded its abolition. Earlier this year, future GOP White House hopeful Newt Gingrich proposed cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 12.5%, the same level as in the multinational haven of Ireland. And as ThinkProgress reported, Gingrich and Gohmert have plenty of company: Gohmert’s defense of corporations are not the words of a single rogue congressman. Rather, sticking up for the big guy is an orthodoxy that pervades the Republican Party and the conservative movement. Newly-elected Gov. Scott Walker (R) of Wisconsin has pledged to repeal the state’s corporate income tax. Sen.-elect Marco Rubio (R-FL) wants to slash the federal corporate income tax. And Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) proposes completely eliminating the tax in his radical Roadmap for America. Of course, Republican mythmaking obscures both the real tax burden and true global competitive environment for U.S. firms. As Forbes documented, myriad loopholes dramatically lower the effective U.S. corporate tax rate. In 2009, the U.S. tax bill on ExxonMobil’s record $45.2 billion profit was zero. (Exxon responded by saying its final bill would be “substantial” – but undisclosed.) General Electric not avoided paying taxes altogether last year; it actually record a $1.1 billion tax benefit. While the effective U.S. corporate rate at 25.3% remains higher than most developed countries, its contribution to federal revenue is shrinking. As CBPP noted , an analysis by the Congressional Research Service showed U.S. corporations paid than 49 percent in the 1950s, 38 percent in the 1960s, and 33 percent in the 1970s. And the total bill for corporate taxes has dropped to only about 10% of federal revenue. Combined federal and state corporate taxes now represent just 2.1% of American GDP , combined to an average of 3.4% among OECD members. As ThinkProgress explained, on that scorecard “American corporations actually already pay far less in taxes than those in other industrialized nations.” Total federal taxes as a percentage of GDP have remained roughly 20% since the 1950′s. But as Tom Schaller at FiveThirtyEight explained using data and a helpful chart from the Tax Policy Center , the contribution of corporate tax revenue has plummeted: Income taxes as a share of GDP have held steady during the same time period. Corporate and excise taxes, paid mostly by businesses and which conservatives complain are inefficient and simply passed through to consumers anyway, have gone down as a share of that 20 percent. What’s gone up are payroll taxes which fund programs like Medicare and Social Security that the same tea partiers were warning Obama and congressional Democrats not to touch in the same breath they were complaining about the socialist expansion of the healthcare system. As the picture reveals, corporate tax revenue as a percentage of GDP has plunged by roughly two-thirds since 1950: As Ezra Klein explained in the Washington Post in September, despite our higher effective corporate tax rates, “If you actually look at the amount of money our corporate tax raises, we’re about one standard deviation beneath the OECD average.” Why? The reason is simple enough: Our corporate tax code is complicated. A lot of businesses, like S-corporations and partnerships, don’t pay corporate taxes. Others use loopholes and exemptions and deductions to push their actual rate way down. We could have a simpler code with lower rates that would raise more money. Or as Klein lamented in April : The U.S. corporate tax rate really is (pdf) larger than in most developed countries, even as revenues are considerably lower and shrinking. But that doesn’t suggest that a simple cut in the corporate income tax would bring back this revenue. If these companies have developed practices for sheltering income overseas, what’s to say they won’t continue to do so even after the tax rate is cut, meaning that revenue would actually fall? The Wyden-Gregg reform package takes the right approach, lowering the rate at the same time as it subjects foreign profits to the tax. This makes evasion both harder and less attractive. In the mean time, the new Republican majority continues to push for more tax breaks for their corporate constituents on Wall Street. Which is altogether fitting. Even as the GOP calls to extend the Bush tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans, the barons of Wall Street have returned to their opulent ways . And as it turns out, their firms are the very ones piling up the biggest profits right now. As Justin Fox via Ezra Klein explains, not all corporations are pulling in near-record profits: So the reason that corporate profits are near their all-time highs would appear to be that financial corporations (mainly big financial corporations) and multinationals are making lots of money and paying less of it out in taxes. Hmmmm. The corporate profit picture would seem to mirror what’s been going on in income distribution for individuals for the past few decades. The money is increasingly going to a select group at the very top of the economic food chain, who are able to reap the rewards of global growth, play the financial system astutely, and avoid taxes. Welcome to the Republican Party platform. (An earlier version of this piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Unlike Chris Matthews who wants to pretend this is not what goes on daily in D.C., Cenk Uygur goes through what is pretty much standard operating procedure in Washington; lobbyists influencing legislation, the revolving door between holding office and working for corporate America and the influence campaign donations have on our politicians. And the end result, we have the TSA using useless scanners that violate our privacy and don’t detect explosives or putting up with overly intrusive pat-downs.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Bill Hemmer sure was excited to get to greet Lou Dobbs to the Fox News network yesterday: “What in the world took you so long, man? We’ve been waiting for ya!” And you could see why, immediately. Because Hemmer had already given intentionally false information to his viewers about the DREAM Act, which was the segment’s real subject: He claimed that it “grants citizenship” to students whose parents brought them here as children. This is, of course, a lie : In fact, the versions of the DREAM Act pending in the House and Senate both state that eligible unauthorized immigrants could have their status adjusted to “conditional permanent resident status,” which “shall be valid for a period of 6 years” and subject to termination should the immigrant cease to be eligible. Following the 6-year period, Dream Act immigrants would have to meet further requirements to gain permanent resident status and could only apply for citizenship (provided they meet further requirements) after they obtained such status. Fox anchors, as MM notes, have also been claiming that the DREAM Act would allow some immigrants to “jump right to the front of the line.” This too is a lie. And you see that chryon in the screen grab? The one that describes the DREAM Act as an “immigration overhaul”? Absurdly false: The DREAM Act is only a very narrowly tailored bit of immigration legislation designed to resolve a small sliver of the issue — a far, far stretch from an “immigration overhaul” as in comprehensive immigration reform. But none of this bothers Lou Dobbs, who you may recall was vowing to reform his Latino-bashing ways while still between contracts . That was good until he got the Fox gig. Now he not only is happy to let Hemmer’s blatant misrepresentations of the DREAM Act stand, he’s happy to regurgitate them and then blame Democrats for even daring to bring the issue up. Dobbs openly admits he’s reading almost directly from the phony talking points being distributed by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R- KKK Mississippi. But as Jackie Mahendra at America’s Voice explains, these talking points are lies mounted upon falsehoods with some distortion thrown in for good measure: The controversy comes after his office circulated a white paper that is currently reverberating throughout the conservative echo chamber, in which Sessions mixes anti-immigrant fear-mongering (see: “criminal aliens”) with f actually inaccurate assertions about the legislation and its implications. Session’s spokesman Stephen Miller told Fox News: “The scope of this proposal is enormous, extending amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants including a number who have committed serious crimes, incentivizing further illegality.” In truth, the DREAM Act is a narrowly-tailored and traditionally bipartisan piece of legislation that ensures that only those with strong moral character qualify. As such, it would strengthen the military, bolster future economic competitiveness, and offer American taxpayers a r eturn on their investment in hard-working immigrant kids who want to give back to the nation they love and call home. There is a wide gulf between extremists like Sessions and sensible Americans who recognize the importance of DREAM. In fact, 70% of the American people support the DREAM Act . The DREAM Act’s many champions include Senators Richard Lugar (R-IN) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Representatives Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL), Howard Berman (D-CA), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), and Luis Gutierrez (D-IL). Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA) has a piece today in Politico , in which he asks: If you knew that passing legislation to allow 2.1 million American students to pursue higher education or military service, our government could collect $3.6 trillion over the next 40 years, would you do it? According to The Economist : The DREAM Act sends the message that although American immigration law in effect tries to make water run uphill, we are not monsters. It says that we will not hobble the prospects of young people raised and schooled in America just because we were so perverse to demand that their parents wait in a line before a door that never opens. It signals that we were once a nation of immigrants, and even if we have become too fearful and small to properly honour that noble legacy, America in some small way remains a land of opportunity. It’s a smart piece of legislation, and we’re 100 percent behind its passage. Of course, its smartness is a virtual guarantee that Republicans like those at Fox — and especially Lou Dobbs — will oppose it.
Continue reading …Saying America has a history of doing what it takes to make a better tomorrow, President Barack Obama is calling on a country climbing out of its worst economic slump in decades to summon that spirit again this holiday season. (Nov. 25)
Continue reading …Credit: Marcio Jose Sanchez / AP Photo More good election news fro California. We elected a great Attorney General and kicked to the curb a far right extremist who was Karl Rove’s major dude. More than three weeks after he declared victory in the race for state attorney general, Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley conceded defeat Wednesday as he trailed by more than 50,000 votes in one of the closest statewide races in California history. The decision means that San Francisco Dist. Atty. Kamala Harris will assume the post of California’s top law enforcement official, giving Democrats a clean sweep of the statewide offices. Uncertainty had swirled around the election result since shortly after the votes began to be counted on Nov. 2. Cooley claimed victory on election night, only to discover the next morning that he was behind. As county registrars scrambled to count more than 2 million ballots left uncounted after election day, the lead bounced back and forth, but Harris has held an advantage for more than a week. She should be outstanding. enlarge Credit: Crooksandliars Karl Rove and another one of his shady groups tried to buy Cooley the election, but ultimately failed in their quest. The race for California’s Attorney General is getting dirty. Unusual national interest is suddenly coming to California’s election from a group in Alexandria, VA called The Republican State Leadership Committee, a group cofounded by Karl Rove. This committee just put 1.1 million to fund attack ads against Harris now showing in Los Angeles. To put the size of this last-minute effort in context, consider that Harris has spent about $3 million for her entire campaign – which she raised within the legal limit of $6,500 per donation, with the identity of each contributor a matter of public record. The Daily beast wrote an i nteresting profile on Kamala . She’s not a DLC/Third Way ConservaDem. But maybe the most interesting woman to watch is Kamala Devi Harris, the district attorney for San Francisco, whose Democratic primary win puts her on course to become the first African-American and Asian-American woman elected attorney general in California. Born to one of the first black economics professors at Stanford University and an Indian physician at a time when interracial marriage was still illegal in parts of America, she has already made history. Now, Harris’ challenge is to break through one of the last glass ceilings in California .
Continue reading …CNN has demonstrated strongly and repeatedly that it does not believe in objectivity or fairness in reporting on homosexuality. On Tuesday's Newsroom, CNN anchor Kyra Phillips touted a new study from the leftist Southern Poverty Law Center that added some of the nation's leading social conservative groups — including the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, the National Organization for Marriage, the American Family Association, and the Traditional Values Coalition — to its registry of “hate groups” like the Ku Klux Klan. Phillips skipped that part, but hyped the SPLC's reading of 'hate crime' statistics with no liberal label for the group. She also invited on radical gay activist and sex columnist Dan Savage — who delighted the Left by attacking CNN (on CNN) for allowing any conservatives to speak at all on gay issues. Savage touted the new SPLC “hate” designation as a reason for CNN to ban them and their “dehumanizing rhetoric” from their network. Phillips began like she was doing an infomercial: read more
Continue reading …Though progress has been made in recent years in making playthings for children safer, far too many toys remain on store shelves that pose serious risks to America’s kids, a consumer watchdog group says in a new report.
Continue reading …If you thought the media attacks on Sarah Palin and her family were deplorable in 2008, it's clear with the 2012 presidential campaign starting and her name being bandied about, you ain't seen nuttin' yet. Take the Washington Post's Richard Cohen for example who penned a column Tuesday concluding, ” She could not be the president of black America nor of Hispanic America “: read more
Continue reading …