Thanks to Bernie Sanders and the new financial regulation passed by Congress, we’re learning more about the Federal Reserve’s $3.3 trillion bailout of Wall Street in 2008. It turns out the Fed lent money not just to the likes of Goldman Sachs (which desperately needed it) but also to companies such as Verizon and Toyota, as well as to foreign financial institutions. Essentially the Fed lent money at almost zero interest to, well, just about everybody. Bernie Sanders, take it away… —PZS The Washington Post: But the extent of the lending to major banks—and the generous terms of some of those deals—heighten the political peril for a central bank that is already under the gun for a wide range of actions, including a recent decision to try to stimulate the economy by buying $600 billion of U.S. bonds. “The American people are finally learning the incredible and jaw-dropping details of the Fed’s multitrillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street and corporate America,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime Fed critic whose provision in the Wall Street regulatory overhaul required the new disclosures. “Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions.” Read more Related Entries November 30, 2010 Unemployment Benefits Run Out November 29, 2010 Obama Wants to Put Federal Workers’ Wages on Ice
Continue reading …Mike Huckabee, who might just run for president again, says “whoever in our government leaked that information is guilty of treason and I think anything less than execution is too kind a penalty.” Related Entries November 15, 2010 The Origin of America’s Intellectual Vacuum November 7, 2010 Canada Reports Huge Jump in Immigration
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: planetgreen.discovery.com Net Neutrality Rules! But for how long? Media Decoder: Level 3 Communications, a central partner in the Netflix online movie service, accused Comcast on Monday of charging a new fee that puts Internet video companies at a competitive disadvantage. Level 3, which helps to deliver Netflix’s streaming movies, said Comcast had effectively erected a tollbooth that “threatens the open Internet,” and indicated that it would seek government intervention. Comcast quickly denied that the clash had anything to do with network neutrality, instead calling it “a simple commercial dispute.” The dispute highlighted the growing importance of Internet video delivery — an area that some people say needs to be monitored more closely by regulators. Net neutrality, which posits that Internet traffic should be free of any interference from network operators like Comcast, is thought to be on the December agenda of the Federal Communications Commission. “With this action, Comcast demonstrates the risk of a ‘closed’ Internet, where a retail broadband Internet access provider decides whether and how their subscribers interact with content,” Thomas C. Stortz, the chief legal officer for Level 3, said in a statement Monday. Those issues cut to the heart of Comcast’s imminent acquisition of NBC Universal, which is in the final stages of review by the F.C.C. and the Justice Department. The F.C.C. is considering attaching a condition to the merger that would aim to keep Comcast’s Internet network open to competitors, according to public filings this month.In theory, without government action, Comcast could speed up streams of NBC programs and slow down streams of its rivals’ programs. “This may be one of those teaching moments for consumers to understand what’s at stake,” said Michael McGuire, a media analyst for Gartner… read on This is a preview of what’s in store for America if Big Business has its way with the Internet. Netflix is hugely successful and popular; heck, I’m a big fan of Insta-watch myself. Does anybody really believe the free market Gods of Capitalism will suddenly not worry about the Almighty bottom line when they get the chance to make more profits? Netflix is becoming a direct competitor with Comcast and other content providers and it’s only a matter of time before companies begin to make it harder for them to do business if they feel it will take cash out of their pockets. UPDATE: The fight is gearing up on the mobile web side too : AT&T Gains FCC’s Ear as Regulators Near Decision on Net Neutrality Rules AT&T Inc. has spoken more frequently than any other company with U.S. officials as they near a decision on rules that may restrict how carriers offer mobile Internet service, according to regulatory filings. Jim Cicconi , a Republican who is AT&T’s top Washington executive, talked at least six times about the net-neutrality rules from Nov. 4 to Nov. 26 with Edward Lazarus , chief of staff at the Democrat-led Federal Communications Commission, according to disclosure filings with the agency… read on
Continue reading …enlarge I hope you all had a nice, relaxing Thanksgiving weekend. While you were digesting turkey and buying discounted iPads for friends and family, the world continued to fall apart. Aren’t I just a cheery way to wake up in the morning? Let’s get started with today’s Opening Bell… First, some chipper news: Black Friday was a relative hit this year, which could bode well for the rest of the holiday shopping season: The number of people who shopped at stores and online between Thursday and Sunday jumped 8.7% to 212 million shoppers, according to a National Retail Federation survey of 4,306 shoppers conducted by BIGresearch. The total amount spent during the four-day weekend reached an estimated $45 billion, with the average spending rising 6.4% to $365.34, the survey showed. A flood of doorbuster deals from Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) and Target Corp. (TGT) to Best Buy Co. (BBY) and Macy’s Inc. (M), coupled with earlier-than-ever store openings and offers of free shipping put shoppers in a mood to spend. The number of those who began their Black Friday shopping at midnight tripled this year to 9.5% while those who shopped on Thanksgiving day itself also have doubled over the past five years to 22.3 million, the survey showed. Hooray non-sucky sales data! Ain’t no Austerity Grinch can hold down the American Christmas Spirit, baby! OK, now that we’ve got the good news out of the way, let’s turn to Ireland. You may be wondering why I’m concentrating on Ireland so much. Well, I think Ireland’s situation demonstrates in very clear terms the ways in which corporatism is undermining democracy. Right now you have a soon-to-be-out-on-its-arse government readying an austerity plan that will dip into the country’s pension fund to bail out its banks’ European creditors. And to make things worse, the EU’s Commissioner for Economic Affairs is warning any incoming government against even thinking of revising the terms of this spectacularly awesome deal: The EU Commissioner for Economic Affairs, Olli Rehn, has said that it would not be advisable for any new government in Ireland to attempt to renegotiate either the interest rate on the EU/IMF loan or the use of the National Pension Reserve Fund in repairing the banking sector. In an interview with RTÉ News, Commissioner Rehn said it did not want to involve himself in democratic politics in Ireland, but he said: ‘They are key parts of the programme so I would not advise re-opening these’. He said he ‘fully understood’ the frustration and anger of the Irish people about the banking sector, which he said had made big mistakes in the past. ‘However we have to move on and the essential thing is to complete the repair, implying both the restructuring and downsizing of the banking system,’ he said. This is delightful! “Oh sure, your banking system has totally busted your country and is now stealing from your pension fund, but really, I think it’s time to look forward and not backward, don’t you?” 50,000 Irishfolk protested the austerity measures in Dublin, but it sadly probably won’t do much good. The least bad option for Ireland right now is default on its debt — yes, it means that credit to the country will freeze, but even that beats becoming a permanent vassal state of the EU and the IMF. But hey, all of those wonderful austerity measures should do wonders for Ireland’s economic growth, right ? Ireland’s economy may only expand by 0.9 per cent in 2011, the European Commission said today, only half of what the Government predicted in its four-year plan. In the four-year plan, which was published last week, the Government said real gross domestic product will grow by an average of 2.75 per cent in the years between 2011 and 2014. It said real GDP is expected to grow by 1.75 per cent next year, after falling 2 per cent this year. The commission’s figures were part of a report on the wider EU. It said GDP in Europe may weaken to 1.5 per cent in 2011 as budget cuts to stem a mounting debt crisis hurt consumer demand and faltering global expansion curbs exports. Oh. But hey, at least the austerity plan will reassure the markets and will stop the spread of the debt contagion to other Eurozone countries, right ? European governments’ 85 billion- euro ($113 billion) bailout package for Ireland failed to quell the market turmoil menacing the euro as stocks, bonds and the currency declined. Irish 10-year bonds slid after an early advance, Spanish bonds slid by the most since the euro’s launch and European shares sank 1.4 percent. The euro slid against 15 of its 16 major counterparts and the cost of insuring the debt of Spain and Portugal against default soared to records. “The notion that a rescue package for Ireland would create a firewall and stop the fear of contagion is clearly discredited,” said Preston Keat, director of research at Eurasia Group, a political consultancy, in London. “Portugal and Spain are already facing pressures in the markets.” Oh. I guess the good news is that America is not alone in having thoroughly incompetent economic and political leadership. This way we can all go down in flames together! Speaking of incompetent American economic leadership, President Obama has once again deployed his patented “offer free concessions in the hope that the GOP stop comparing me to Pol Pot” negotiating strategy: President Barack Obama on Monday called for freezing the pay of 2 million federal employees, saying the move is the first of many difficult decisions that must be made to slash the nation’s mounting deficits. “The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require some broad sacrifice, and that sacrifice must be shared by the employees of the federal government,” Obama said. The two-year freeze would apply to all civilian federal employees, including those working at the Department of Defense, but would not affect military personnel. The freeze is expected to save more than $5 billion in savings over two years, $28 billion over five years and more than $60 billion over 10 years, White House officials said. Joe Lieberman apparently thinks this is a great idea. Joe Lieberman also wants to keep tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans in place. In other words, Joe Lieberman supports denying pay increases to VA nurses taking care of wounded vets just so Paris Hilton can keep her precious, precious tax cut. In case you haven’t noticed, our political ruling class is deeply, deeply evil. And finally, Heidi Moore has a good piece on how banks plan to skirt capital requirements using (GULP) synthetic collateralized debt obligations: Here’s the new development: Banks are increasingly planning to use these synthetic C.D.O.’s to reduce the amount of capital they use to back up derivatives deals for clients. Derivatives are inherently riskier. Basel regulations call for banks to keep at least 7 percent of regulatory capital on hand to offset their risky businesses. Here is an example of the way these synthetic C.D.O.’s usually work: A bank may lend up to $2 billion to, say, a group of 100 companies. The bank would usually have to commit about 7 percent to 8 percent of the face value, or up to $150 million, to protect against the default of those loans. The synthetic balance sheet C.D.O.’s bundle that risk away. The C.D.O. bundle is full of contracts that protect the bank if the derivatives trades fail. The protection means that the bank has to hold less money in regulatory capital. As a result, after using synthetic C.D.O.’s, the bank has to commit only a fraction of its own capital — around $10 million or less in this case. The whole idea behind capital requirements is that banks should have enough liquidity to handle significant withdrawals during a financial panic. If the banks are instead outsourcing this requirement to firms like A.I.G. in the hopes that they’ll be able to cash in on insurance policies during a full-blown economic crisis… uh, eep? Today’s Doom Index: Gold futures rose by $3.20 to settle at $1,367.50 yesterday. Yields on 10-year t-bills dropped by 0.35% and closed at 2.82%. Thank God Obama is instituting a federal pay freeze — otherwise who knows how the bond vigilantes might have responded!
Continue reading …Sensational headlines aside, there are some revealing moments among the few newly-released Department of State cables published by Wikileaks. Although the transcript for this particular cable is long , it’s worth reading the entire strand in context rather than by excerpt. A somewhat long cable narrative, relating the gist of a meeting between Senator John Kerry and the Amir of Qatar reveals how the urgent the Obama administration views Iran’s misbehavior in the region, and how frustrated they are at Iran’s continued rebuffs. Qatar’s Amir is clearly biased toward Iran, claiming that Ahmadinejad’s success is due to the fact that he is “uncorrupted” as he chides Kerry and the US for siding with the protesters during the Iran elections. At one point, the Amir points out that the US must remember that Iranians are Persians first, and must be approached on that basis. What does that mean, exactly? There is another cable from 1979 , written by Victor Tomseth before he was taken hostage later that year which outlines the basis upon which the US should approach any negotiations with Iran, beginning with the understanding that the single dominant aspect of the Persian psyche is an “overriding egoism”. I’m not sure if this was what the Amir was referring to, and Senator Kerry seems to look at his warning as an admonition to recognize the Persian tradition in arts, education and music. It might be instructive for him to consider the content of Tomseth’s cable. The takeaway for me so far with regard to the Middle Eastern set of cables is how the Obama administration is taking that region as a holistic endeavor, recognizing that peace between Israel and Palestine is part of finding a peaceful resolution to the ever-restive Iranians, and they are serious about trying to broker a peace throughout that region. The full quote from the cable of this portion of the conversation follows. ¶25. (C) Senator Kerry observed that the international community is moving toward imposing additional economic sanctions on Iran. Understanding and respecting that Qatar needs to balance its relationships with regional powers, including Iran, the Chairman asked the Amir for his perspective on where we are going on Iran. ¶26. (C) The Amir answered by affirming that his first obligation is to defend the interests of Qatar. Due to the natural gas field Iran shares with Qatar, Qatar will not “provoke a fight” with Iran. He added that in the history of the two countries, “Iran has not bothered us.” That said, the Amir noted that Iran is an important country in the Middle East. He faulted the U.S. for “making the mistake of speaking up for protesters” after the disputed Iranian presidential elections. ¶27. (C) The Iranian regime is strong, continued the Amir, because President Ahmadinejad is uncorrupted. “That is the secret to his success.” Khatami is also not corrupted, but as a reformer he is in a weak position. Rafsanjani, on the other hand, is corrupt. ¶28. (C) Senator Kerry lamented that every communication the current Administration has attempted to the Government of Iran has gone back channel and been met with no response. There have been non-U.S. initiatives, too. Again, no success. The Chairman observed that the Iranians are scared to talk. The Supreme Ayatollah had met with Russian President Putin, but seems not inclined to meet with other political leaders. Our instinct is that we need to find a way to talk to him. ¶29. (C) Your instinct is right, replied the Amir. The U.S. needs to talk directly with senior Iranian officials. The Amir then asked, “What if I talk to the Iranian President. What would you have me say?” ¶30. (C) Senator Kerry responded, “The U.S. seeks serious discussion and sought to create a new foundation for a relationship based on Iran’s non-confrontational compliance with IAEA requirements and other mutual interests.” Those interests include dealing with drug-running, the Taliban, and illicit trade. T he Chairman told the Amir he feared that Iran still thinks it is dealing with the 1953 America that tried to overthrow the Iranian government. ¶31. (C) The Amir responded that you cannot blame them for having that attitude, and Senator Kerry agreed, adding that the U.S. has a very different posture in the post-Cold War world of today. Iran has ambitions; I know this from other regional leaders, said the Senator. These are the first words that come out of their mouths. ¶32. (C) Iran wants to be a “big power,” agreed the Amir, but what sort? He reminded Senator Kerry the U.S. should not forget that Iranians are Persian and the U.S. needs to approach them in that framework. ¶33. (C) Senator Kerry stressed that the U.S. “would love to have that dialogue.” The U.S. respects Iranian civilization — talent, art, culture, etc. It is crazy to continue on this collision course. The region needs schools and jobs, emphasized the Chairman, not another war. The Amir agreed that “demographics are a big worry.” Not just for the countries in the region but for the U.S. too. ¶34. (C) Many scientific and technological transformations are underway, noted the Senator, “but Iran misinterprets the road to being a great power and the degree to which the international community is concerned about Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.” We are at a “fork in the road,” and Iran must choose between confrontation or building partnerships. If the latter, we can open up new opportunities for cooperation in the sciences, technology, education, robotics, energy and other ongoing transformations. ¶35. (C) Going back to the speech he had delivered in Doha the previous evening, Senator Kerry told the Amir that 17 former U.S. Secretaries of State and Defense had come out in favor of eliminating nuclear weapons. Every stop closer to realizing that goal is a sign of progress, but “no one believes Iranian nukes get us closer to that goal.” ¶36. (C) Senator Kerry reported that leaders of regional Arab countries tell me they want nuclear weapons if the Iranians have them. The Amir responded that he did not believe they were serious, but are saying this to put additional pressure on Iran. ¶37. (C) The Chairman noted that the disputed Iranian presidential elections may have derailed U.S. efforts to have serious dialogue with Tehran. The Amir agreed, offering that the Israelis are also using Iran’s quest for nuclear weapons as a diversion from settling matters with the Palestinians. The historical backdrop of Arab-Persian relations does not help, the Amir added.
Continue reading …“If the Pentagon wants something, the logic goes, then it must be necessary,” writes Gregg Easterbrook, in a recent examination of military waste. As a result,
Continue reading …Those greedy bureaucrats sending out grandma’s social security check and cleaning up the toilets in our national parks finally have it coming to them, thanks to our honest, hard-working politicians. Republican lawmakers are expected to call for downsizing of the government and pay-cuts, while President Obama is proposing a two-year pay freeze for non-military federal employees. That measure would, the White House estimates, save a piddling (in deficit terms) $5 billion by 2012. It’s probably more of a strategic maneuver to keep the GOP’s purges at bay.
Continue reading …By Chris Hedges Many of us will, after our rally in Lafayette Park, attempt to chain ourselves to the fence outside the White House. It is a pretty good bet we will all spend a night in jail. Hope, from now on, will look like this. Related Entries November 29, 2010 Blaming Obama’s America First November 28, 2010 Rudolph the Unemployed Reindeer
Continue reading …By E.J. Dionne, Jr. We are about to enter a two-year period in which the Beltway Republicans will always blame Obama’s America first—you know, the America that happens to disagree with much of the conservative agenda, the America from which they want to “take back” the country, as if the rest of us represent an alien force. Related Entries November 28, 2010 Iran’s Best Friends on Capitol Hill November 24, 2010 Fail and Grow Rich on Wall Street
Continue reading …enlarge As the charges against Julian Assange heat up , the anonymous folks of Wikileaks continue undaunted and promise another bombshell : Who: WikiLeaks. What: A Twitter message posted by the whistle-blowing website announced plans to release classified U.S. diplomatic cables reporting corruption allegations against foreign governments and leaders. WikiLeaks said the latest release will be seven times larger than the previous leak of classified Pentagon documents of roughly 400,000. U.S. State Department officials say the upcoming dump features corruption allegations and is set to cause serious embarrassment for American and foreign governments and politicians named in them. Where: It is not yet known where the classified documents would be released, however, the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, gave America’s New York Times, Britain’s Guardian newspaper and the German weekly news magazine Der Spiegel – access to the documents some time ago. When: WikiLeaks has not specified when the tranche of documents would be released but Pentagon spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan said U.S. officials were expecting a possible release of documents ‘late this week or early next week’. As would be expected, the State Department has claimed that the leaks could cause irreparable harm and could put lives at risk . The latest leak is expected to include documents covering US dealings and diplomats’ confidential views of countries including Australia, Britain, Canada, Israel, Russia and Turkey. The letter from the US state department’s legal advisor Harold Koh was a response to correspondence from Mr Assange, who had written to the US ambassador to Britain, Louis Susman. Mr Assange had asked which individuals would be put at risk due to the leak, the State Department said. A senior American official told the BBC that Mr Assange was offering to negotiate over limited redactions. Of course, expect the government to go into overdrive in demonizing Assange even further in the hopes of deflecting the information.
Continue reading …