At the top of Tuesday's NBC “Today,” co-host Ann Curry feigned shock as she excitedly proclaimed: “Say what?…A retired executive throws President Obama a rather surprising question during a town hall forum…” A clip was played of retired Google executive Doug Edwards teeing up the President by asking: “Would you please raise my taxes?” [ Audio available here ] Moments later, fill-in co-host Lester Holt remarked to Curry: “You said, 'Say what?' I think the President was probably wondering the same thing. A guy gets up and says, 'Will you raise my taxes?'” Holt went on to gush: “Obviously the President wants to raise taxes on wealthier Americans as part of his deficit program, but what he heard there was music to his ears.” View video after the jump
Continue reading …Click here to view this media At President Obama’s town hall in Mountain View today, Doug Edwards , former Consumer Marketing Head for Google, stood and asked the President to raise his taxes to preserve Pell Grants, education funding and disaster relief, among other things. This was, of course, a riff on Warren Buffett’s column a couple of weeks ago where he called on Congress to make his tax rate equitable with that of his secretary, who actually pays more in taxes than Buffett does. The near-instantaneous reaction on Twitter and elsewhere has been fascinating. Mark Knoller tweeted this : The US Govt accepts contributions. Online at pay.gov or by mail: Bureau of Public Debt, Dept G, P.O Box 2188, Parkersburg, WV 26106-2188. The right-wingers are nearly apoplectic, with Michelle Malkin ready to vomit while they furiously spread speculation that the guy was a plant. Because surely an ex-Googler who made a fortune via stock options and the like couldn’t possibly be sincere about wanting to pay more in taxes to make sure kids get decent educations and things? So the counter from the right is either, “Sure, go ahead and pay whatever you want, here’s the address to send it to!” or “You lie!” Why is it so difficult to believe that some wealthy people also have a sense of social responsibility? Meanwhile, just for perspective, the Koch brothers have slid up the Forbes “Richest” List to number four from number 44, nipping at the heels of Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and Larry Ellison. How’s that for “failed policy,” tea party? What should make us all sick about their explosive gain in net worth is that it was largely the result of speculative activity in markets they game , especially energy markets. Update : Oh, the assumptions they make. Check out these tweets from Brendan Buck (John Boehner’s spokesman) and Brad Dayspring (Eric Cantor’s spokesman), and their stupid assumptions. [h/t ThinkProgress ] enlarge enlarge
Continue reading …Comedy writer and producer also created It Ain’t Half Hot Mum and Hi-de-Hi! with Jimmy Perry David Croft, the TV comedy writer and producer responsible for BBC sitcoms including Dad’s Army, It Ain’t Half Hot Mum, Hi-de-Hi, ‘Allo ‘Allo and Are You Being Served?, has died aged 89. Croft died “peacefully in his sleep” at home in Portugal on Tuesday, his family announced on his website. “He was a truly great man, who will be missed by all who had the great fortune of knowing and loving him,” they said in a statement. “We know that he would have been proud that you had all been watching.” Croft’s long-running partnership with Jimmy Perry spawned Dad’s Army, arguably the most successful British sitcom of all time. Originally aired between 1968 and 1977, it remains one of BBC2′s most popular shows even today. The duo also wrote It Ain’t Half Hot Mum – which they considered the funniest of all their collaborations – Hi-de-Hi! and You Rang M’Lord. Croft also wrote Are You Being Served? and ‘Allo ‘Allo with Jeremy Lloyd, and later teamed up with Richard Spendlove to write Oh Doctor Beeching! Croft, who graduated from Sandhurst, rose through the army ranks to major, and served in North Africa, India and Singapore. His experiences in the armed forces provided much of the material for Dad’s Army and It Ain’t Half Hot Mum. •
Continue reading …Comedy writer and producer also created It Ain’t Half Hot Mum and Hi-de-Hi! with Jimmy Perry David Croft, the TV comedy writer and producer responsible for BBC sitcoms including Dad’s Army, It Ain’t Half Hot Mum, Hi-de-Hi, ‘Allo ‘Allo and Are You Being Served?, has died aged 89. Croft died “peacefully in his sleep” at home in Portugal on Tuesday, his family announced on his website. “He was a truly great man, who will be missed by all who had the great fortune of knowing and loving him,” they said in a statement. “We know that he would have been proud that you had all been watching.” Croft’s long-running partnership with Jimmy Perry spawned Dad’s Army, arguably the most successful British sitcom of all time. Originally aired between 1968 and 1977, it remains one of BBC2′s most popular shows even today. The duo also wrote It Ain’t Half Hot Mum – which they considered the funniest of all their collaborations – Hi-de-Hi! and You Rang M’Lord. Croft also wrote Are You Being Served? and ‘Allo ‘Allo with Jeremy Lloyd, and later teamed up with Richard Spendlove to write Oh Doctor Beeching! Croft, who graduated from Sandhurst, rose through the army ranks to major, and served in North Africa, India and Singapore. His experiences in the armed forces provided much of the material for Dad’s Army and It Ain’t Half Hot Mum. •
Continue reading …Orwell prize council says winning article contained unattributed material and £2,000 award has not yet been returned The Independent columnist Johann Hari is facing fresh accusations of plagiarism from the Orwell prize committee over an article that won him the prestigious award in 2008 . Hari earlier this month said he stood by the Orwell prize-winning articles in a lengthy apology published by the Independent, but handed back the award on 14 September “as an act of contrition for errors I made elsewhere”. However, the high-profile columnist has not returned the £2,000 prize money from the 2008 award, the Orwell prize council said on Tuesday. “The council concluded that the article contained inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else’s story (specifically, a report in Der Spiegel),” the Orwell prize council said in a statement. “The council ruled that the substantial use of unattributed and unacknowledged material did not meet the standards expected of Orwell prize-winning journalism.” Hari handed back the Orwell prize after an internal investigation by the Independent founder and former editor Andreas Whittam Smith. He said in his apology a fortnight ago: “Even though I stand by the articles which won the George Orwell prize, I am returning it as an act of contrition for the errors I made elsewhere, in my interviews.” Hari apologised for plagiarising the work of others to improve interviews and for editing the Wikipedia entries of people he had clashed with, using the pseudonym David Rose, “in ways that were juvenile or malicious”. He admitted calling “one of them antisemitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk”. He is taking unpaid leave of absence from the paper until 2012 and is to undertake a journalism training course. The Orwell prize council said it decided to revoke Hari’s award in July, but declined to make the decision public because the Independent’s investigation was ongoing. The Independent had “prohibited” Hari from responding to claims about his work during the investigation, the council added. “The council is delighted to be able to put this difficult episode behind it finally, and get on with the important business of running the prizes and promoting the values of George Orwell into the future,” said Bill Hamilton, the acting chair of the council of the Orwell prize. Annalena McAfee, Albert Scardino and Sir John Tusa – the judges from 2008 – have decided not to re-award Hari’s prize. •
Continue reading …Orwell prize council says winning article contained unattributed material and £2,000 award has not yet been returned The Independent columnist Johann Hari is facing fresh accusations of plagiarism from the Orwell prize committee over an article that won him the prestigious award in 2008 . Hari earlier this month said he stood by the Orwell prize-winning articles in a lengthy apology published by the Independent, but handed back the award on 14 September “as an act of contrition for errors I made elsewhere”. However, the high-profile columnist has not returned the £2,000 prize money from the 2008 award, the Orwell prize council said on Tuesday. “The council concluded that the article contained inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else’s story (specifically, a report in Der Spiegel),” the Orwell prize council said in a statement. “The council ruled that the substantial use of unattributed and unacknowledged material did not meet the standards expected of Orwell prize-winning journalism.” Hari handed back the Orwell prize after an internal investigation by the Independent founder and former editor Andreas Whittam Smith. He said in his apology a fortnight ago: “Even though I stand by the articles which won the George Orwell prize, I am returning it as an act of contrition for the errors I made elsewhere, in my interviews.” Hari apologised for plagiarising the work of others to improve interviews and for editing the Wikipedia entries of people he had clashed with, using the pseudonym David Rose, “in ways that were juvenile or malicious”. He admitted calling “one of them antisemitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk”. He is taking unpaid leave of absence from the paper until 2012 and is to undertake a journalism training course. The Orwell prize council said it decided to revoke Hari’s award in July, but declined to make the decision public because the Independent’s investigation was ongoing. The Independent had “prohibited” Hari from responding to claims about his work during the investigation, the council added. “The council is delighted to be able to put this difficult episode behind it finally, and get on with the important business of running the prizes and promoting the values of George Orwell into the future,” said Bill Hamilton, the acting chair of the council of the Orwell prize. Annalena McAfee, Albert Scardino and Sir John Tusa – the judges from 2008 – have decided not to re-award Hari’s prize. •
Continue reading …Maryland Blogger and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers activist Cory McCray discusses the problems that led to Baltimore’s inner city section seeing a rise in the poverty rate of 20 percent in one year: Yes the federal government, banks, and Wall Street have contributed to the increased poverty rate in inner city neighborhoods, but Baltimore City should not be surprised because it’s lawmakers have also contributed to the problem of unemployment and underemployment which has an adverse effect of increasing poverty within Baltimore City. Here are three clear examples of how Baltimore City lawmakers are a part of the problem, while denying favorable solutions. This is part of a larger problem we’re seeing across the country during the tough economic times created by Republican policies. It isn’t just the bad policies put forth by George W. Bush and Republicans in Congress (and often supported by too many Democrats), it’s a matter of either incompetent or even more extreme partisan conservatives blocking good policies and passing bad policies at the state and local level that is making the economy and jobs situation even worse.
Continue reading …Fox News host Bill O'Reilly on Tuesday dismissed the pro-Obama talking points repeated by Good Morning America's George Stephanopoulos. After quoting the President, Stephanopoulos parroted, “And it's clear that the President and his team, there's a strategy here. They think that the Republican base is way outside of the mainstream right now.” An almost incredulous O'Reilly snorted, ” So, wait a minute, George. You're telling me, this is shocking to me, that the President doesn't like Republicans, that he's going to criticize Republicans. Come on .” [See video below. MP3 audio here .] O'Reilly also declared that Obama would lose: “I think that the economy is so bad that if the Republicans run a candidate with credibility, the President will lose, unless something happens.” Stephanopoulos uncritically repeated Obama's smears on Republicans: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Meanwhile, President Obama really going after this. You saw him in these fund-raisers out on the west coast. He said, he told them, “Has anybody been watching the debates lately? You have got a governor whose state on fire denying climate change. You have got audiences cheering at the prospect of somebody dying because they don't have health care and booing a service member in Iraq because they're gay. That's not reflective of who we are.” ABC News journalist Jake Tapper on Monday offered more context than his colleague. Tapper explained,
Continue reading …Former Ukraine PM back in court on charges of abusing power after case was adjourned due to western pressure The much-criticised trial of Ukraine’s former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko noisily resumed on Tuesday, following a surprise break, amid pressure from the west . Dozens of Tymoshenko’s supporters gathered outside the court, attempting to push their way into the hall, according to local news reports. EU officials have called on President Viktor Yanukovych to put an end to the trial, which they see as a politically motivated move to silence the Ukrainian leader’s chief rival. Ukrainian officials have denied the case is part of a “witch-hunt”. Tymoshenko has been on trial since June on charges of abusing her power while prime minister, when she signed a gas deal with Moscow in 2009 that left Ukraine paying sky-high prices for Russian gas. In August she was sent to a Kiev jail for allegedly disrupting the court during the rowdy trial. The EU has warned Yanukovych that his attempts to finalise a free trade agreement with the bloc would be put in jeopardy if the case went forward. Meanwhile, Ukraine has been trying to repair relations with Russia instead, with Yanukovych flying to Moscow at the weekend in an attempt to renegotiate Tymoshenko’s gas deal. He said “significant” progress had been made. The case has polarised Ukraine and yet again split the country between its western and Russian leanings. The court abruptly adjourned two weeks ago as western pressure mounted. “During the two-week break not only we, her defence, but the global community, which is interested in the case, understood that there are no bases to suggest crimes in the actions of Yulia Tymoshenko,” her lawyer Yury Sukhov told journalists in Kiev. Her other lawyer, Sergei Vasenko, said: “We understand that the case depends on the will of the president of Ukraine. In two or three hours we will know what decision Viktor Yanukovych will take today, and we will know if Ukraine is going on the European path of development or if it will remain in the same state of democracy in which it is found today.” Yulia Tymoshenko Ukraine European Union Viktor Yanukovych Europe Miriam Elder guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Phone-hacking scandal ‘far beyond News of the World’, alleges MP, calling for James Murdoch to resign as BSkyB chairman A Labour MP has alleged that phone hacking at News International has gone “far beyond the News of the World” as he claimed that the Sun newspaper is also implicated in illegal practices. Tom Watson made the allegation during an emergency motion debate on the phone-hacking scandal at the Labour party conference which called for James Murdoch to stand down as chairman of BSkyB in the wake of the phone hacking scandal that rocked Rupert Murdoch’s media empire this summer. The scandal took centre stage at the party conference on Tuesday morning as speakers took turn to lament Labour’s past era of cosy relationships with media barons and called for measures to clamp down on bad practice by media companies and journalists. Watson warned Labour activists that the scale of phone hacking at the now closed News of the World could be the tip of the iceberg. “Do you really think that hacking only happened on the News of the World?” he said. “Ask Dominic Mohan, the current editor of the Sun. He used to joke about lax security at Vodafone when he attended celebrity parties. Ask the editor of the Sun if he thinks Rupert Murdoch’s contagion has spread to other newspapers. If he gives you an honest answer, he’ll tell you it’s only a matter of time before we find the Sun in the evidence file of the convicted private investigator that hacked Milly Dowler’s phone. “This month we learn that journalists at the Times are affected by this scandal. The paper is shutting down its BlackBerry phone network – I hope they aren’t deleting the records.” The emergency motion called for trade unions to have a role on the press watchdog and for the rules governing media ownership in Britain to be examined in the wake of the affair. Watson turned on the case for applying the “fit and proper” test to News International, a company he described as “sick with corruption and criminality from “top to bottom”. “Let’s tell Ofcom what we think about James Murdoch,” he said. “I wouldn’t put him on the board of an ornamental garden. He’s certainly not a fit and proper person to chair a major broadcaster.” Watson was among a number of speakers who hailed the leadership of Ed Miliband following revelations over the summer of how widespread phone hacking had been at News international, and contrasted it to Labour’s past closeness to Rupert Murdoch under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Watson, who received a standing ovation from delegates over his persistent questioning on phone hacking, said MPs had to “accept our shame of the blame” but that Labour had acted quickly in response to hacking allegations. He said that hacking had been allowed to take place because of “police failure, a newspaper out of control, politicians refusing to act”. “There is no point in us glossing over it. We got too close to the Murdochs and allowed them to become too powerful,” he said. “As a party, we got there in the end. When Ed [Miliband] got up at prime minister’s question time and said what he said about the Murdochs, like you I thought, ‘That is the leader I want’. This is the Labour party I want to be part of.” He went on: “Now our leadership must spearhead seeing the reforms through. It is not just about the News of the World or just about phone hacking. Murdoch should also tell us about the computer hackers, the people who left Trojan devices on computer hard-drives enabling them to read emails.” Chris Bryant told the conference that Labour’s past relationship with the Murdoch empire was “not our finest moment” as he urged the party to “choose our bedfellows with a little more care” in the future. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, underlined Labour’s new approach to the media mogul as he told delegates that Labour would create “tougher” media ownership laws and a register which could see errant journalists barred from the profession. In a message to Rupert Murdoch, he said: “Mr Murdoch: never again think you can assert political power in pursuit of your commercial interests or ideological beliefs. This is Britain, Mr Murdoch, the integrity of our media and our politics is not for sale.” Lewis said the history of the relationship between Labour and the Murdoch press was a “complex and tortuous one”. “But what can never be complex or tortuous is the responsibility of politicians to stand up in the public interest without fear or favour.” Setting out his reforms, he said: “Never again can one commercial organisation have so much power and control over our media. In the period ahead, Labour will bring forward proposals for new, tougher cross-media ownership laws.” While a free press was “non-negotiable”, Lewis said that with freedom also comes responsibility. “Neither the current broken system of regulation nor state oversight will achieve the right balance,” he said. “We need a new system of independent regulation, including proper, like-for-like, redress which means that mistakes and falsehoods on the front page receive apologies and retraction on the front page. And as with other professions, the industry should consider whether people guilty of gross malpractice should be struck off.” Lewis also said it was time David Cameron “came clean” about the appointment of former NoW editor Andy Coulson as his communications chief. Bryant, a former minister whose phone was hacked, told Labour delegates that he hoped those involved in phone hacking and the ensuing cover-up would go to jail. He hit out at those who had “lied and lied and lied” to parliament during the hacking investigation. Earlier this month, he claimed that he had tracked 53 lies told to parliament. But he said his tireless researcher had now tallied that a total of 486 lies had been told to parliament. “I hope that people will go to jail for the criminal cover-up that happened at News of the World,” he said. “But there is a bigger scandal, because it is the monopoly that BSkyB have. The fact that they’ve got 80% of the pay-TV market and 95% in the pay-TV market in many places. They can hoover up television rights, and hardly produce a decent programme of their own. That is one of the things that we should be dealing with – the monopoly at BSkyB. Unite general secretary Len McCluskey pressed for a “long overdue” review of the rules governing media ownership in the UK and told the conference that there should be an element of “shame” in the party over the way past leaderships helped to “prop up” the Murdoch empire. In a swipe at former premier Tony Blair, he said: “The Labour party needs to learn lessons – and they won’t be learned by standing down by the banks of the Jordan blessing Murdoch’s children.” “They will be learned by setting up the two commissions called for in this motion. One is for an overdue look at the rules controlling media ownership and the unacceptable concentration of power, of which the Murdoch empire is the worst example. And the second is to look at a still wider question – how independent trade unions are essential in ensuring that the rich and powerful do not get it all their own way. That they do not control our politics without the slightest counter-balance in society as a whole.” Miliband has pledged to work with Hollywood star Hugh Grant on media reforms. The actor, who has become a champion for the Hacked Off campaign that is pressing for tougher sanctions and restrictions on the press, claims some newspapers will be “back to their old tricks” soon and questioned whether Labour MPs would still stand up to the media when the furore had died down. Grant met the Labour leader on Monday night to press his case at the party’s conference in Liverpool. A senior Labour source said it was an “excellent meeting”. “Ed expressed his thanks for Hugh’s work in the Hacked Off campaign and they said they would work together in future.” News International said it was aware Watson had made the allegations but it had no comment. Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers News of the World The Sun News International Newspapers James Murdoch Labour Labour conference 2011 Labour conference Tom Watson Dominic Mohan Milly Dowler David Cameron Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …