Johann Hari faces fresh plagiarism allegations

Orwell prize council says winning article contained unattributed material and £2,000 award has not yet been returned The Independent columnist Johann Hari is facing fresh accusations of plagiarism from the Orwell prize committee over an article that won him the prestigious award in 2008 . Hari earlier this month said he stood by the Orwell prize-winning articles in a lengthy apology published by the Independent, but handed back the award on 14 September “as an act of contrition for errors I made elsewhere”. However, the high-profile columnist has not returned the £2,000 prize money from the 2008 award, the Orwell prize council said on Tuesday. “The council concluded that the article contained inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else’s story (specifically, a report in Der Spiegel),” the Orwell prize council said in a statement. “The council ruled that the substantial use of unattributed and unacknowledged material did not meet the standards expected of Orwell prize-winning journalism.” Hari handed back the Orwell prize after an internal investigation by the Independent founder and former editor Andreas Whittam Smith. He said in his apology a fortnight ago: “Even though I stand by the articles which won the George Orwell prize, I am returning it as an act of contrition for the errors I made elsewhere, in my interviews.” Hari apologised for plagiarising the work of others to improve interviews and for editing the Wikipedia entries of people he had clashed with, using the pseudonym David Rose, “in ways that were juvenile or malicious”. He admitted calling “one of them antisemitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk”. He is taking unpaid leave of absence from the paper until 2012 and is to undertake a journalism training course. The Orwell prize council said it decided to revoke Hari’s award in July, but declined to make the decision public because the Independent’s investigation was ongoing. The Independent had “prohibited” Hari from responding to claims about his work during the investigation, the council added. “The council is delighted to be able to put this difficult episode behind it finally, and get on with the important business of running the prizes and promoting the values of George Orwell into the future,” said Bill Hamilton, the acting chair of the council of the Orwell prize. Annalena McAfee, Albert Scardino and Sir John Tusa – the judges from 2008 – have decided not to re-award Hari’s prize. •

Posted by on September 27, 2011. Filed under News, Politics, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.