Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 167)

So it’s white U.S. citizens who make up the bulk of food stamp users. Damn, there goes another tea party myth! I’m not shocked that this is the sole source of income for many, since I’m sometimes approached by locals who try to sell me their food stamps: The Agriculture Department’s annual snapshot on the characteristics of food stamp households, released Friday, shows that seven in 10 households receiving food stamps had no earned income last year , though many got other forms of government benefits. Nearly 21% of households on food stamps also received Supplemental Security Income, assistance for the aged and blind. Some 21.4% received Social Security benefits. Just 8% of households also received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the cash welfare program. But some 20% of households had no cash income of any kind last year, up from 15% in 2007, the year the recession began, and up from 7% in 1990. That’s partly because most household heads who were receiving food stamps were also out of work. Just 21.8% of them had jobs in 2010, while 19.8% were jobless and looking for work. More than half of household heads who received food stamps, 51.1%, weren’t in the labor force and weren’t searching for work. Labor-force dropouts have been a particular concern for economists, who worry their lost potential damages economic output. Those who drop out of the work force often turn to other government programs, such as Social Security disability, which is costly. On average, food stamp households brought home $731 per month in gross income. Their food assistance averaged $287 a month. Among the other interesting factoids: –Food stamps may be emerging as a lifeline for families after their unemployment insurance expired. Just 6.7% of households who received food stamps were getting jobless benefits. – Nearly half of all food-stamp recipients, 47%, were children under the age of 18. Another 8% of recipients were age 60 or older. – Whites made up the largest share of food stamp households, 35.7% . Some 22% of households receiving food stamps were counted as African American and 10% were Hispanic. – U.S. born citizens made up the majority, 94%, of food stamp households.

Continue reading …
Trial of Michael Jackson doctor begins in Los Angeles courtroom

Conrad Murray, a physician to the late pop singer, accused of delivering fatal dose of anaesthetic to Jackson The trial of the doctor charged over Michael Jackson’s death was due to open on Tuesday, complete with some star power and a worldwide audience. Dr Conrad Murray will appear in a packed Los Angeles courtroom, where opening statements and initial testimony will be heard. Murray is accused of delivering a fatal dose of anaesthetic to Jackson. The singer’s family, including his parents and many of his siblings, are expected to be present as dozens of reporters cover the case. Proceedings also will be televised and broadcast online. While much is known about Jackson’s June 2009 death, the trial will reveal new information and provide a detailed record of his final hours. Murray’s trial is expected to be the first time that the public hears – in the defendant’s own words – his account of what happened in the bedroom of Jackson’s rented mansion. By Monday evening, 15 satellite trucks and news vans were parked within a block of the courthouse. Prosecutors plan to call Jackson’s friend and choreographer, Kenny Ortega, as their first witness. During a pre-trial hearing on Monday night, Nareg Gourjian, a lawyer for Murray, claimed Jackson was unconscious backstage before his March 2009 London news conference for his This Is It concert series, and he appeared drunk during the announcement itself. Murray’s defence lawyers wanted a video of the news conference shown to jurors, but the judge in the case ruled against it. The defence team is widely expected to argue that Jackson was a drug addict whose habits led to his death. Gourjian said in court on Monday that Jackson’s March 2009 news conference began 90 minutes late because “Jackson was unconscious on the sofa.” He added that Jackson appeared “hungover”, citing the chief executive of concert promoter AEG Live, which was organising the shows. He argued it was “readily apparent from watching the video that Mr Jackson was under the influence”. But judge Michael Pastor, who is presiding over Murray’s trial, ruled that the tape should not be shown to jurors. Pastor said the video was irrelevant because it occurred months before Jackson died. Michael Jackson trial Michael Jackson Pop and rock United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Trial of Michael Jackson doctor begins in Los Angeles courtroom

Conrad Murray, a physician to the late pop singer, accused of delivering fatal dose of anaesthetic to Jackson The trial of the doctor charged over Michael Jackson’s death was due to open on Tuesday, complete with some star power and a worldwide audience. Dr Conrad Murray will appear in a packed Los Angeles courtroom, where opening statements and initial testimony will be heard. Murray is accused of delivering a fatal dose of anaesthetic to Jackson. The singer’s family, including his parents and many of his siblings, are expected to be present as dozens of reporters cover the case. Proceedings also will be televised and broadcast online. While much is known about Jackson’s June 2009 death, the trial will reveal new information and provide a detailed record of his final hours. Murray’s trial is expected to be the first time that the public hears – in the defendant’s own words – his account of what happened in the bedroom of Jackson’s rented mansion. By Monday evening, 15 satellite trucks and news vans were parked within a block of the courthouse. Prosecutors plan to call Jackson’s friend and choreographer, Kenny Ortega, as their first witness. During a pre-trial hearing on Monday night, Nareg Gourjian, a lawyer for Murray, claimed Jackson was unconscious backstage before his March 2009 London news conference for his This Is It concert series, and he appeared drunk during the announcement itself. Murray’s defence lawyers wanted a video of the news conference shown to jurors, but the judge in the case ruled against it. The defence team is widely expected to argue that Jackson was a drug addict whose habits led to his death. Gourjian said in court on Monday that Jackson’s March 2009 news conference began 90 minutes late because “Jackson was unconscious on the sofa.” He added that Jackson appeared “hungover”, citing the chief executive of concert promoter AEG Live, which was organising the shows. He argued it was “readily apparent from watching the video that Mr Jackson was under the influence”. But judge Michael Pastor, who is presiding over Murray’s trial, ruled that the tape should not be shown to jurors. Pastor said the video was irrelevant because it occurred months before Jackson died. Michael Jackson trial Michael Jackson Pop and rock United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Amanda Knox was a ‘faithful woman in love’ says defence lawyer

Counsel for Raffaele Sollecito compares her to cartoon character Jessica Rabbit, saying she was ‘not bad – just drawn that way’ There was “no trace” of either Amanda Knox or her former Italian boyfriend in the room where Meredith Kercher was murdered, a court hearing their appeal was told on Tuesday. Knox, who was depicted as a witch at the previous hearing, was more like Jessica Rabbit in the 1988 animated film Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, according to one of her lawyers. “She can be seen as a man-eater. But in fact she was a faithful woman in love,” said the first defence lawyer to sum up before the judges and jury who will decide if Knox and her ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, are freed. Giulia Bongiorno, counsel for Sollecito, quoted the cartoon vamp: “I’m not bad. I’m just drawn that way.” And jabbing a finger at the prosecutors, she said: “They drew her that way”. Her brief foray into the world of animated cartoon was the prelude to a vigorous assault on the prosecution case in which she came within a hair’s breadth of claiming that, like Roger Rabbit, her client and his former girlfriend had been framed. In 2009, a lower court decided Sollecito and Knox murdered Kercher in a drug-fuelled sex game with a third man, Rudy Guede. Yet, said Bongiorno, ‘in the room of the crime, there are no traces of either Amanda or Raffaele. This is the absolute truth’. The only alleged evidence was a trace of Sollecito’s DNA on Kercher’s bra clasp, and that was evidence “torn apart by the experts’ report”. In June, two Rome university professors appointed by the court to review the forensic findings had reported the DNA could have got there by contamination. The bra clasp lay at the scene of the crime for more than six weeks. The experts also reported that DNA attributed to Kercher on the alleged murder weapon was not necessarily hers. The knife bore signs that it had been handled by Sollecito and Knox, but was in the young Italian’s kitchen and likely therefore to have been handled by both. As a result of the experts’ report, Bongiorno said: “Nothing connects Raffaele Sollecito to this crime … The few indications were to do with Amanda Knox and have been transferred to him. There are people who acquire a family along with a girlfriend. He acquired a crime.” But, added his lawyer, there was “nothing on Amanda either”. Sollecito was a 23-year-old computer science student at the university of Perugia when he was arrested for the murder. His lawyer warned the court against being misled by the prosecution’s emphasis on the number of judges who had endorsed its case. A footprint in Kercher’s bedroom was ascribed to her client and that version was accepted as fact by judges up to and including Italy’s highest appeals court. It then turned out to belong to Rudy Guede, she said. Amanda Knox Italy Meredith Kercher Europe United States John Hooper guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘JN1 won’t become a propaganda station’

The TV news channel dubbed ‘the Jewish al-Jazeera’ hopes to attract a global audience with its independent stance The world’s first Jewish 24-hour TV news channel has launched with the aim of offering not just “news for Jews” but attracting viewers interested in world events from a Jewish perspective as an alternative to leading networks such as the BBC, CNN, Sky News and al-Jazeera. “Since the beginning of the world, everything with the word ‘Jewish’ in it has been news,” said Alexander Zanzer, Brussels bureau chief of Jewish News 1 (JN1). “So we thought it was about time someone created a 24-hour rolling TV news channel that looks at global events through Jewish glasses.” Broadcasting in Europe began via satellite last Wednesday. The channel will be rolled out across North America and the Middle East in cable and satellite packages over the coming weeks, and an internet live stream will be up and running within a month. “We don’t look at our channel as just being ‘news for Jews’,” said JN1′s editor-in-chief Peter Dickinson, based in Kiev. “It’s a much wider enterprise than that and I’m confident we’ll get a lot of non-Jewish viewers coming by for the variety of our voice. “If you look at the news market over the last 20 years, the real development has been diversification. A lot of channels have gotten a lot of kudos by being different and we hope to do the same by offering our own unique perspective on global affairs”. JN1 has already opened bureaux in Brussels, Tel Aviv and Kiev, and further studios are planned for Washington, Paris, London, Berlin and Moscow, with both Jewish and non-Jewish correspondents being signed up. The channel – a not-for-profit venture – currently broadcasts in English, but plans to expand and provide current affairs coverage in Russian, French, Spanish, Hebrew, Italian and German, said Zanzer. Its owners are Ukrainian oligarchs Igor Kolomoisky and Vadim Rabinovich, president and vice-president respectively of the European Jewish Union (EJU), a Brussels-based umbrella body of Jewish communities and organisations in Europe. Both are prominent philanthropists in the international Jewish community, financing civil society events in Israel and Ukraine. The pair have reportedly invested $5m in the channel because, said Zanzer, “they now want to do something that resonates on an international level”. The Palestinian statehood bid at the United Nations dominated the channel’s output in the last week, but it also broadcast other Jewish-themed international news items, such as a call for fans of the football team AFC Ajax to bring Israeli flags to their next home match in protest against calls from antisemitism campaigners to ban the club’s supporters from singing pro-Jewish chants. Eytan Gilboa, a communications professor at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University, said that JN1 was part of a growing trend of independent global news channels set up by governments and non-state organisations dissatisfied with coverage offered by leading international TV news networks of their countries and interests. “France has France 24, Russia has Russia Today, China has CCTV news,” he said. “Israel should have had a channel like this long ago, though I’m glad JN1 is a private venture because government channels have no credibility.” Coverage of Israel by existing news networks like BBC World and CNN International – as well as al-Jazeera – was biased against the Jewish state, said Gilboa. The point was echoed by Zanzer, who said JN1 would “give more voice to Israel”. “Journalists want good guys and bad guys when they write a story, and when they write about Israel they’ve already made up their minds,” he added. But Zanzer was keen to point out that the channel was independent from the state of Israel and “will not necessarily be pro- or anti-Israel; we’ll let the public hear the Israeli perspective and it’ll be up to the viewers to decide whether they’re right”. The channel’s Israeli bureau chief, CNN and ABC News veteran Jordana Miller, was also adamant that JN1 will not become a “propaganda station”, saying “there’s nothing about this network that will exclude, diminish or cut off the Palestinian narrative when it comes to the conflict here”. Gilboa claimed it was too soon to say whether channels such as JN1 could be successful but pointed out that success was relative and dependeent on the goals and expectations of the people backing them. “None of these channels are profitable, they lose money,” he said. “It’s like foreigners buying football teams in Britain – they don’t buy them to make a profit.” TV news Al-Jazeera Television industry Israel Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
BAE to axe nearly 3,000 jobs

• Where the cuts will fall • Manufacturing likely to end at Brough • Unions call for government intervention Defence company BAE Systems has confirmed it is cutting almost 3,000 jobs at sites across the country, mainly in its military aircraft division. The firm ended days of speculation by giving details of a huge redundancy programme, saying it needed to maintain competitiveness. The biggest job cuts will be at sites in Warton and Samlesbury in Lancashire and at Brough in east Yorkshire, although jobs will also be lost at the firm’s head office in Hampshire. Ian King, chief executive of BAE Systems, said: “Our customers are facing huge pressures on their defence budgets and affordability has become an increasing priority. Our business needs to rise to this challenge to maintain its competitiveness and ensure its long-term future.” BAE announced that it had started a consultation about ending manufacturing at the Brough site, which employs 1,300 workers. The firm said most of the job cuts would be in its military aircraft division, which is being affected by a slowdown in orders for the Eurofighter Typhoon combat jet. King said: “Some of our major programmes have seen significant changes. The four partner nations in the Typhoon programme [UK, Italy, Germany and Spain] have agreed to slow production rates to help ease their budget pressures. “Whilst this will help extend our production schedule and ensure the production line stays open until we receive anticipated export contracts, it does reduce the workload at a number of our sites. “The proposals announced today aim to put the business into the right shape to address the challenges we face now and in the future and ensure we are in the best possible position to win future business. “We understand that this is a time of uncertainty for our employees and we are committed to working with them and their representatives to explore ways of mitigating the potential job losses.” Unite union national officer Ian Waddell said: “After days of speculation and rumours, our worst fears have been confirmed. “It’s a dark day for thousands of skilled men and women across the country and it is a dark day for British manufacturing. “BAE Systems have dealt a hammer blow to the UK defence industry and Unite is determined to fight the cuts. “Last year the UK defence industry generated over �£9bn of revenue from exports alone. “The government’s defence review has led to deep cuts in defence spending and significant job losses, meaning it will be difficult to redeploy the jobs now at risk. “The government cannot sit on its hands and allow these highly skilled jobs to disappear. We expect the MoD to intervene urgently to protect these jobs, otherwise the UK’s defence industry risks losing the critical mass it needs to maintain its reputation as a world leader in defence manufacturing. “Once again George Osborne’s proclamation that he would create the right conditions to drive the economy forward through British manufacturing is ringing hollow.” In Brough, workers could be seen walking to a mass meeting where they were due to be addressed by a senior manager. They will then be allowed to go home for the day and the site will reopen on Wednesday. Local GMB officer Dave Oglesby said workers at the plant had been left “absolutely shocked” by the news. Speaking outside the sprawling facility, he said: “We were given firm assurances early this year that this plant would stay open – this plant was the most viable plant to deliver the Hawk [jet trainer aircraft] contract and we have had a complete turnaround. “It looks, to all intents and purposes, that this will no longer be a manufacturing facility.” Oglesby said the plant had been in existence for 100 years, often with three generations of the same family working there. He said there were 70 to 80 apprentices working at Brough. “Young people have been robbed of their future. Nine hundred families have been robbed of their livelihoods,” he added. BAE Systems Job losses Manufacturing sector Defence policy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
How Brighton v Crystal Palace grew into an unlikely rivalry | Simon Burnton

Alan Mullery was in charge of Brighton and Terry Venables was at the Palace helm when these clubs began their feud Most of football’s great rivalries involve clubs thrown together either by geography – Arsenal and Tottenham, say, or Dundee United and, er, Dundee – or by years of high-profile, high-intensity competition for the game’s biggest prizes – which explains Liverpool ongoing ding-dong with Manchester United, or Real Madrid’s with Barcelona. The rivalry between Crystal Palace and Brighton falls into neither of those categories. While Croydon and Brighton are handily linked by road and rail, football’s hardcore rarely make an easy commute their first priority and Palace are not appreciably closer to the Seagulls than they are to Reading in the west, to Southend in the east, to Watford in the north or to any of the London clubs. They have played each other quite frequently — the Eagles’ first visit to the Amex Stadium on Tuesday night will be their 89th meeting — but Palace have played the considerably more local Millwall four times more and don’t really hate them any more than everyone else does, while Brighton have faced, for example, Leyton Orient more often. And neither can it be said that they have regularly spent seasons vying with each other for major honours. As it turns out, though, they did not need to: for these two clubs, once was enough. In June 1976 Palace appointed Terry Venables as manager. The following month Albion named Alan Mullery as their new manager. The pair were already fierce rivals, a situation that dated back exactly a decade to their time as team-mates at Tottenham. “I don’t really know how it started,” Mullery says now. “I think it was probably because I got the Tottenham captaincy before him. I’m sure Terry wanted to be captain but Bill Nicholson gave it to me and he was made vice-captain. I can’t really give you any other reason. But it was a friendly rivalry — we’ve never been enemies. We used to share a room together at Tottenham and I still bump into him occasionally.” Their two clubs had identical ambitions that year — both managers were expected to lead their clubs out of the Third Division at the first attempt. As it turns out, they both succeeded but such was the drama and discord along the way that by the summer of 1977 the two clubs had become irrevocable enemies. The first of five meetings that season came in October at the Goldstone Ground, where the teams drew 1-1. “They’ll be with us at the last, you’ll see,” said Mullery, whose Brighton side had topped the table going into the game. Play was briefly stopped when three smoke bombs were thrown on to the pitch, forcing Mullery to appeal to the crowd for calm. But the fun really got going when the teams were drawn together in the first round of the FA Cup. The first game, played on 20 November, was drawn 2-2. Rachid Harkouk, whom that Monday’s Guardian described as “part Moroccan, part Maltese” but who was born in Chelsea and went on to play for Algeria in the 1986 World Cup, came off the bench to score a remarkable equaliser for Palace. It was remarkable not only because of its quality — he dribbled past two men before scoring — but because it was his first appearance for the club and came days after the end of a two-month FA ban for being sent off twice in a single game for his Sunday league team, Pinner Gas. “Give them their due, they came for a draw, really worked hard for it and that’s what they got,” said Mullery, whose side had dominated much of the game. “I dare them to do it at Crystal Palace.” At Crystal Palace three days later Brighton dominated much of the game but Palace came for a draw, really worked hard for it and that’s what they got. The second replay, to be held at a neutral venue, was twice postponed because of bad weather and had been, said The Guardian, “prefaced by much verbal propaganda of the chest-thumping variety”. It was eventually played at Stamford Bridge on 6 December, and it was on this evening that the nascent rivalry between the teams was to be elevated to the now familiar level of bitterness. Paul Holder put Palace ahead in the 18th minute and soon afterwards Brighton had a goal disallowed because Peter Ward was adjudged to have handled — though Palace’s Jim Cannon later confessed that the striker had touched the ball only because he had shoved him into it. If that caused grumbles, what happened in the 78th minute provoked fury. Palace’s Barry Silkman fouled Chris Cattlin in the area and Brighton were awarded a penalty, which the future Manchester City manager, Brian Horton, converted. The referee, however, made him retake the kick because of encroachment — even though everybody agreed that the only players to have done any encroaching had been wearing Palace colours. This time Paul Hammond saved it. The game ended 1-0. At the final whistle Mullery approached the referee, Ron Challis, whose actions that night earned him the nickname “Challis of the Palace”. “I was angry but it wasn’t because we’d lost,” Mullery says. “It was because of the referee’s decision to force Brian Horton to retake the penalty. After the game I approached him and asked him why he had made that decision. He said it was because of encroachment, but it was Crystal Palace players who were encroaching, not Brighton players. It was a terrible decision.” Still furious, Mullery marched off the pitch. “As I was walking up the tunnel,” he says, “a load of boiling hot coffee was thrown over me by a Crystal Palace supporter. So I pulled a handful of change out of my pocket, threw it on the floor and shouted, ‘That’s all you’re worth, Crystal Palace!’ And I’d shout it at anybody who did that.” Mullery accompanied this gesture with some others involving his fingers, described in The Guardian as “none too polite signs”. Finally, he was led away by police. Mullery was fined £100 for bringing the game into disrepute and warned as to his future conduct. He wrote to the Palace chairman, Ray Bloye, to explain that his subsequent remark that the Palace team was “rubbish” had been misquoted. “I don’t think it was just the Cup run that started it off,” says Mullery, “I think it was the rivalry between their manager and me. That’s where the rivalry came about. Because we were in the same league, doing the same thing — trying to get into the first division at the same time. I used to find it very difficult to understand what their problem was. Portsmouth and Brighton are 20 miles apart, Arsenal and Tottenham are about three miles apart. When you’ve got clubs 45 miles apart it does sound a bit silly.” The clubs’ fifth and final meeting of the season came in March, when Palace won 3-1 at home with Harkouk scoring two Palace goals and creating the other in what the Guardian called “a display of uncontrolled manic aggression”. Richard Yallop, writing our match report, was so impressed with Venables’s tactical nurdlings in that game — an eyebrow-raising five of Brighton’s players were man-marked — that he decided this was “surely a man with the tactical nous to be a future England manager”. Such was Harkouk’s hex over Brighton that in one fixture the following season Venables played him even though he was injured, just to scare Mullery. Before the same match Mullery refused to announce his team until 2.45pm, just to scare Venables. They drew again. Though both teams went up that season, neither won the league — that was Mansfield’s privilege — and later that year Brighton, who had briefly been nicknamed the Dolphins, rechristened themselves the Seagulls, a direct avian response to Palace’s Eagles. After a season of consolidation in the Second Division the two teams, and their warring managers, battled for promotion again in 1978-79, and this time it was even closer. Brighton, whose transfer budget was more than double their rival’s, finished their season at the top of the Second Division table only for Palace to win a previously postponed game against Burnley the following weekend to pip them to the title by a point. Mullery later spent two seasons in charge of Palace, some achievement under Ron Noades’ trigger-happy chairmanship — Mullery was his sixth appointment in 20 months and Dave Bassett, who succeeded him in 1984, lasted only three days — but his appointment prompted fury and a short-lived boycott from fans. “By the time I got the job it was already long forgotten from my point of view,” he says now. “You’re the first person to ask me about it in the last 30 years.” Championship 2011-12 Crystal Palace Brighton & Hove Albion Championship Simon Burnton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
How Brighton v Crystal Palace grew into an unlikely rivalry | Simon Burnton

Alan Mullery was in charge of Brighton and Terry Venables was at the Palace helm when these clubs began their feud Most of football’s great rivalries involve clubs thrown together either by geography – Arsenal and Tottenham, say, or Dundee United and, er, Dundee – or by years of high-profile, high-intensity competition for the game’s biggest prizes – which explains Liverpool ongoing ding-dong with Manchester United, or Real Madrid’s with Barcelona. The rivalry between Crystal Palace and Brighton falls into neither of those categories. While Croydon and Brighton are handily linked by road and rail, football’s hardcore rarely make an easy commute their first priority and Palace are not appreciably closer to the Seagulls than they are to Reading in the west, to Southend in the east, to Watford in the north or to any of the London clubs. They have played each other quite frequently — the Eagles’ first visit to the Amex Stadium on Tuesday night will be their 89th meeting — but Palace have played the considerably more local Millwall four times more and don’t really hate them any more than everyone else does, while Brighton have faced, for example, Leyton Orient more often. And neither can it be said that they have regularly spent seasons vying with each other for major honours. As it turns out, though, they did not need to: for these two clubs, once was enough. In June 1976 Palace appointed Terry Venables as manager. The following month Albion named Alan Mullery as their new manager. The pair were already fierce rivals, a situation that dated back exactly a decade to their time as team-mates at Tottenham. “I don’t really know how it started,” Mullery says now. “I think it was probably because I got the Tottenham captaincy before him. I’m sure Terry wanted to be captain but Bill Nicholson gave it to me and he was made vice-captain. I can’t really give you any other reason. But it was a friendly rivalry — we’ve never been enemies. We used to share a room together at Tottenham and I still bump into him occasionally.” Their two clubs had identical ambitions that year — both managers were expected to lead their clubs out of the Third Division at the first attempt. As it turns out, they both succeeded but such was the drama and discord along the way that by the summer of 1977 the two clubs had become irrevocable enemies. The first of five meetings that season came in October at the Goldstone Ground, where the teams drew 1-1. “They’ll be with us at the last, you’ll see,” said Mullery, whose Brighton side had topped the table going into the game. Play was briefly stopped when three smoke bombs were thrown on to the pitch, forcing Mullery to appeal to the crowd for calm. But the fun really got going when the teams were drawn together in the first round of the FA Cup. The first game, played on 20 November, was drawn 2-2. Rachid Harkouk, whom that Monday’s Guardian described as “part Moroccan, part Maltese” but who was born in Chelsea and went on to play for Algeria in the 1986 World Cup, came off the bench to score a remarkable equaliser for Palace. It was remarkable not only because of its quality — he dribbled past two men before scoring — but because it was his first appearance for the club and came days after the end of a two-month FA ban for being sent off twice in a single game for his Sunday league team, Pinner Gas. “Give them their due, they came for a draw, really worked hard for it and that’s what they got,” said Mullery, whose side had dominated much of the game. “I dare them to do it at Crystal Palace.” At Crystal Palace three days later Brighton dominated much of the game but Palace came for a draw, really worked hard for it and that’s what they got. The second replay, to be held at a neutral venue, was twice postponed because of bad weather and had been, said The Guardian, “prefaced by much verbal propaganda of the chest-thumping variety”. It was eventually played at Stamford Bridge on 6 December, and it was on this evening that the nascent rivalry between the teams was to be elevated to the now familiar level of bitterness. Paul Holder put Palace ahead in the 18th minute and soon afterwards Brighton had a goal disallowed because Peter Ward was adjudged to have handled — though Palace’s Jim Cannon later confessed that the striker had touched the ball only because he had shoved him into it. If that caused grumbles, what happened in the 78th minute provoked fury. Palace’s Barry Silkman fouled Chris Cattlin in the area and Brighton were awarded a penalty, which the future Manchester City manager, Brian Horton, converted. The referee, however, made him retake the kick because of encroachment — even though everybody agreed that the only players to have done any encroaching had been wearing Palace colours. This time Paul Hammond saved it. The game ended 1-0. At the final whistle Mullery approached the referee, Ron Challis, whose actions that night earned him the nickname “Challis of the Palace”. “I was angry but it wasn’t because we’d lost,” Mullery says. “It was because of the referee’s decision to force Brian Horton to retake the penalty. After the game I approached him and asked him why he had made that decision. He said it was because of encroachment, but it was Crystal Palace players who were encroaching, not Brighton players. It was a terrible decision.” Still furious, Mullery marched off the pitch. “As I was walking up the tunnel,” he says, “a load of boiling hot coffee was thrown over me by a Crystal Palace supporter. So I pulled a handful of change out of my pocket, threw it on the floor and shouted, ‘That’s all you’re worth, Crystal Palace!’ And I’d shout it at anybody who did that.” Mullery accompanied this gesture with some others involving his fingers, described in The Guardian as “none too polite signs”. Finally, he was led away by police. Mullery was fined £100 for bringing the game into disrepute and warned as to his future conduct. He wrote to the Palace chairman, Ray Bloye, to explain that his subsequent remark that the Palace team was “rubbish” had been misquoted. “I don’t think it was just the Cup run that started it off,” says Mullery, “I think it was the rivalry between their manager and me. That’s where the rivalry came about. Because we were in the same league, doing the same thing — trying to get into the first division at the same time. I used to find it very difficult to understand what their problem was. Portsmouth and Brighton are 20 miles apart, Arsenal and Tottenham are about three miles apart. When you’ve got clubs 45 miles apart it does sound a bit silly.” The clubs’ fifth and final meeting of the season came in March, when Palace won 3-1 at home with Harkouk scoring two Palace goals and creating the other in what the Guardian called “a display of uncontrolled manic aggression”. Richard Yallop, writing our match report, was so impressed with Venables’s tactical nurdlings in that game — an eyebrow-raising five of Brighton’s players were man-marked — that he decided this was “surely a man with the tactical nous to be a future England manager”. Such was Harkouk’s hex over Brighton that in one fixture the following season Venables played him even though he was injured, just to scare Mullery. Before the same match Mullery refused to announce his team until 2.45pm, just to scare Venables. They drew again. Though both teams went up that season, neither won the league — that was Mansfield’s privilege — and later that year Brighton, who had briefly been nicknamed the Dolphins, rechristened themselves the Seagulls, a direct avian response to Palace’s Eagles. After a season of consolidation in the Second Division the two teams, and their warring managers, battled for promotion again in 1978-79, and this time it was even closer. Brighton, whose transfer budget was more than double their rival’s, finished their season at the top of the Second Division table only for Palace to win a previously postponed game against Burnley the following weekend to pip them to the title by a point. Mullery later spent two seasons in charge of Palace, some achievement under Ron Noades’ trigger-happy chairmanship — Mullery was his sixth appointment in 20 months and Dave Bassett, who succeeded him in 1984, lasted only three days — but his appointment prompted fury and a short-lived boycott from fans. “By the time I got the job it was already long forgotten from my point of view,” he says now. “You’re the first person to ask me about it in the last 30 years.” Championship 2011-12 Crystal Palace Brighton & Hove Albion Championship Simon Burnton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Jazeera journalist ‘admits’ Hamas links after detention in Israel

Plea bargain by Kabul bureau chief Samer Allawi was forced on him during six weeks in jail, his lawyer claims An al-Jazeera journalist has admitted to having ties to Hamas six weeks after being detained by the Israeli military following a visit to his family in the West Bank. Samer Allawi, the Arab TV network’s Kabul bureau chief, was released from detention on Monday after a plea bargain resulted in a suspended jail sentence and a £900 fine. Allawi was arrested on 9 August when trying to leave the West Bank via Jordan to return to Afghanistan. His lawyer told Human Rights Watch he had been threatened with physical harm while in detention for months without charge unless he admitted membership of Hamas. Under interrogation, Allawi admitted he had been recruited by Hamas in Pakistan in 1993. A military court convicted Allawi of “conspiracy to provide a service for an outlawed organisation”. Shin Bet, Israel’s intelligence agency, said Allawi had agreed “to carry out military or organisational activity as required by Hamas”. This included “criticising American actions in Afghanistan and voicing support for the Palestinian ‘resistance’”, the agency said in a statement. Salim Wakim, the journalist’s lawyer, said Allawi had refused Hamas requests, adding that his client had been sentenced for “very, very, very trivial crimes”. Following his release, Allawi said he met Hamas officials as part of his job. “There was no evidence against me,” he said. “The whole arrest episode was a charade aimed at extorting al-Jazeera. I was not the target.” He said he had been “subjected to a great deal of pressure during my arrest and the interrogations”. Last week, Human Rights Watch called on the Israeli authorities to release or charge the journalist. Hamas, which won elections in the Palestinian territories in 2006 and took control of Gaza in a bloody battle with rivals Fatah the following year, is outlawed as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and the EU. Al-Jazeera Hamas Israel Press freedom Journalist safety TV news Palestinian territories Television industry Middle East Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Jazeera journalist ‘admits’ Hamas links after detention in Israel

Plea bargain by Kabul bureau chief Samer Allawi was forced on him during six weeks in jail, his lawyer claims An al-Jazeera journalist has admitted to having ties to Hamas six weeks after being detained by the Israeli military following a visit to his family in the West Bank. Samer Allawi, the Arab TV network’s Kabul bureau chief, was released from detention on Monday after a plea bargain resulted in a suspended jail sentence and a £900 fine. Allawi was arrested on 9 August when trying to leave the West Bank via Jordan to return to Afghanistan. His lawyer told Human Rights Watch he had been threatened with physical harm while in detention for months without charge unless he admitted membership of Hamas. Under interrogation, Allawi admitted he had been recruited by Hamas in Pakistan in 1993. A military court convicted Allawi of “conspiracy to provide a service for an outlawed organisation”. Shin Bet, Israel’s intelligence agency, said Allawi had agreed “to carry out military or organisational activity as required by Hamas”. This included “criticising American actions in Afghanistan and voicing support for the Palestinian ‘resistance’”, the agency said in a statement. Salim Wakim, the journalist’s lawyer, said Allawi had refused Hamas requests, adding that his client had been sentenced for “very, very, very trivial crimes”. Following his release, Allawi said he met Hamas officials as part of his job. “There was no evidence against me,” he said. “The whole arrest episode was a charade aimed at extorting al-Jazeera. I was not the target.” He said he had been “subjected to a great deal of pressure during my arrest and the interrogations”. Last week, Human Rights Watch called on the Israeli authorities to release or charge the journalist. Hamas, which won elections in the Palestinian territories in 2006 and took control of Gaza in a bloody battle with rivals Fatah the following year, is outlawed as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and the EU. Al-Jazeera Hamas Israel Press freedom Journalist safety TV news Palestinian territories Television industry Middle East Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …