Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 2043)

Bradley Cooper and Renee Zellweger are kaput after two years, reports US Magazine . (Either that, or it’s a nifty way to generate publicity for Cooper’s new film, Limitless . See, like this .) The 36-year-old Cooper and 41-year-old Zellweger have reportedly been together on and off since 2009, though both have…

Continue reading …

The word “Luddite” is bandied about a lot these days, usually to denote someone steadfastly opposed to the march of technology; it’s “simultaneously a declaration of ineptitude and a badge of honor,” observes Richard Conniff in Smithsonian Magazine . There’s just one problem: the real Luddites didn’t hate technology. They smashed…

Continue reading …

The Internet got its very own street corner yesterday, as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers gave the greenlight to a “.xxx” virtual redlight district. And purveyors of porn and the religious right alike aren’t happy with the decision, reports the New York Times . “Our industry is unanimously…

Continue reading …

President Obama came late to the decision to authorize military force against Libya , but he did so based on the counsel and efforts of Hillary Clinton, reports the New York Times . The secretary of state was herself against intervention until she secured buy-in from Arab nations; she then joined a…

Continue reading …
Huhne: Nuclear power less attractive

Chris Huhne says he still backs government’s ‘three-pronged’ energy approach but Fukushima could make nuclear unviable Britain may back away from the use of nuclear energy because of safety fears and a potential rise in costs after the Fukushima disaster, says Chris Huhne, the energy secretary. In an interview with the Observer, Huhne insisted that he would not “rush to judgment” until the implications of the disaster were known and a report into the safety of UK nuclear plants by the chief nuclear officer, Dr Mike Weightman, was complete. The interim findings are due in May. “I am not ruling out nuclear now,” said Huhne. But he said events in Japan could have profound long-term implications for UK policy, which is based on a three-pronged “portfolio” approach: a commitment to nuclear energy; the development of more renewable energy, such as wind and sea power; and new carbon-capture technology to mitigate the damaging environmental effects of fossil fuel-fired power plants and industrial facilities. Huhne, a Liberal Democrat, said that Britain was in a very different position from Japan, which was vulnerable to strong earthquakes and tsunamis. The UK also used different types of reactors. But he conceded that the Japanese disaster was likely to make it more difficult for private investors to raise capital to build the eight new reactors planned by the government. “There are a lot of issues outside of the realm of nuclear safety, which we will have to assess. One is what the economics of nuclear power post-Fukushima will be, if there is an increase in the cost in capital to nuclear operators.” He said that after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster in the US 32 years ago, it became more difficult to raise money for nuclear investment. “After Three Mile Island in 1979, nuclear operators found it very hard to finance new projects. Huhne said he remained wedded to the “portfolio” approach, but added that nuclear energy’s future, as part of the mix, had become more uncertain as leaders of other nations, including the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, openly questioned its future. “Globally, this undoubtedly casts a shadow over the renaissance of the nuclear industry. That is blindingly obvious,” he said. Any move away from nuclear – while certain to be welcomed by many Liberal Democrats – would alarm many in the Tory party. Tim Yeo, the Conservative chair of the environment and climate change select committee, said any such shift would be a huge mistake. “If Britain abandons or significantly delays its programme of building new nuclear power stations, there are three inevitable consequences. First, electricity prices will rise. Second, Britain will not be able to meet its carbon emission reduction targets; and third, the risk that the lights will go out will significantly increase. “This is because other forms of low carbon energy, such as solar or offshore wind, are more expensive than nuclear. Solar and wind are not reliable generators of electricity – on cloudy, still days they produce nothing. So they have to be backed up by reliable sources of power. If nuclear is not used, that means more gas or coal, both of which have far higher carbon emissions.” The Department of Energy and Climate has carried out its own projections, which show the country could – with a massive extra commitment to renewable energy and successful use of carbon capture on a grand scale – meet its target of reducing emissions by 80% by 2050 without nuclear energy. Huhne said: “It is physically possible to get to our emission reductions without one of the three key pillars. That might be nuclear. We can do the 80% reduction in emissions by 2050 without new nuclear, but it will require a big effort on carbon capture and storage and renewables.” However, Yeo said: “Nuclear currently provides almost one fifth of our electricity. Nearly all our existing nuclear power stations will shut by 2020. Demand for electricity will rise steadily from now on as cars, vans, etc start to use electricity and the heating of buildings relies more on electricity. It is very likely that without new nuclear power stations we will simply not build enough other forms of reliable electricity generation in time to replace the contribution nuclear currently makes.” Last week Huhne asked Weightman to draw up a report into the safety of UK nuclear plants, assessing their resistance to the kind of natural disasters that could hit this country, including flooding and storms. But ministers acknowledge that, even if plants are declared safe, the public perception of nuclear power has been damaged. The cost of meeting new safety conditions and insuring plants, as well as satisfying evacuation requirements in the event of a disaster, could make new reactors economically unviable. Huhne said ministers needed to show flexibility as untried and untested technology succeeded or failed along the way. “The whole point about a portfolio is that over time – a 20-year view – some of those sources [of energy] will turn out to be much more economic and attractive than others,” he said. After the anti-nuclear Lib Dems went into coalition with the Tories last May, Huhne forged a deal under which plans for a new generation of nuclear would go ahead, but without public subsidy. He said at the time that the Lib Dems’ preference for meeting the country’s energy needs was still to make greater use of renewable energy, such as wind and sea power. The deal marked a departure for Huhne from his stance in opposition. In 2007 he said: “Nuclear is a tried, tested and failed technology and the government must stop putting time, effort and subsidies into this outdated industry.” Nuclear power Chris Huhne Energy industry Energy Japan disaster Natural disasters and extreme weather Toby Helm guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Huhne: Nuclear power less attractive

Chris Huhne says he still backs government’s ‘three-pronged’ energy approach but Fukushima could make nuclear unviable Britain may back away from the use of nuclear energy because of safety fears and a potential rise in costs after the Fukushima disaster, says Chris Huhne, the energy secretary. In an interview with the Observer, Huhne insisted that he would not “rush to judgment” until the implications of the disaster were known and a report into the safety of UK nuclear plants by the chief nuclear officer, Dr Mike Weightman, was complete. The interim findings are due in May. “I am not ruling out nuclear now,” said Huhne. But he said events in Japan could have profound long-term implications for UK policy, which is based on a three-pronged “portfolio” approach: a commitment to nuclear energy; the development of more renewable energy, such as wind and sea power; and new carbon-capture technology to mitigate the damaging environmental effects of fossil fuel-fired power plants and industrial facilities. Huhne, a Liberal Democrat, said that Britain was in a very different position from Japan, which was vulnerable to strong earthquakes and tsunamis. The UK also used different types of reactors. But he conceded that the Japanese disaster was likely to make it more difficult for private investors to raise capital to build the eight new reactors planned by the government. “There are a lot of issues outside of the realm of nuclear safety, which we will have to assess. One is what the economics of nuclear power post-Fukushima will be, if there is an increase in the cost in capital to nuclear operators.” He said that after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster in the US 32 years ago, it became more difficult to raise money for nuclear investment. “After Three Mile Island in 1979, nuclear operators found it very hard to finance new projects. Huhne said he remained wedded to the “portfolio” approach, but added that nuclear energy’s future, as part of the mix, had become more uncertain as leaders of other nations, including the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, openly questioned its future. “Globally, this undoubtedly casts a shadow over the renaissance of the nuclear industry. That is blindingly obvious,” he said. Any move away from nuclear – while certain to be welcomed by many Liberal Democrats – would alarm many in the Tory party. Tim Yeo, the Conservative chair of the environment and climate change select committee, said any such shift would be a huge mistake. “If Britain abandons or significantly delays its programme of building new nuclear power stations, there are three inevitable consequences. First, electricity prices will rise. Second, Britain will not be able to meet its carbon emission reduction targets; and third, the risk that the lights will go out will significantly increase. “This is because other forms of low carbon energy, such as solar or offshore wind, are more expensive than nuclear. Solar and wind are not reliable generators of electricity – on cloudy, still days they produce nothing. So they have to be backed up by reliable sources of power. If nuclear is not used, that means more gas or coal, both of which have far higher carbon emissions.” The Department of Energy and Climate has carried out its own projections, which show the country could – with a massive extra commitment to renewable energy and successful use of carbon capture on a grand scale – meet its target of reducing emissions by 80% by 2050 without nuclear energy. Huhne said: “It is physically possible to get to our emission reductions without one of the three key pillars. That might be nuclear. We can do the 80% reduction in emissions by 2050 without new nuclear, but it will require a big effort on carbon capture and storage and renewables.” However, Yeo said: “Nuclear currently provides almost one fifth of our electricity. Nearly all our existing nuclear power stations will shut by 2020. Demand for electricity will rise steadily from now on as cars, vans, etc start to use electricity and the heating of buildings relies more on electricity. It is very likely that without new nuclear power stations we will simply not build enough other forms of reliable electricity generation in time to replace the contribution nuclear currently makes.” Last week Huhne asked Weightman to draw up a report into the safety of UK nuclear plants, assessing their resistance to the kind of natural disasters that could hit this country, including flooding and storms. But ministers acknowledge that, even if plants are declared safe, the public perception of nuclear power has been damaged. The cost of meeting new safety conditions and insuring plants, as well as satisfying evacuation requirements in the event of a disaster, could make new reactors economically unviable. Huhne said ministers needed to show flexibility as untried and untested technology succeeded or failed along the way. “The whole point about a portfolio is that over time – a 20-year view – some of those sources [of energy] will turn out to be much more economic and attractive than others,” he said. After the anti-nuclear Lib Dems went into coalition with the Tories last May, Huhne forged a deal under which plans for a new generation of nuclear would go ahead, but without public subsidy. He said at the time that the Lib Dems’ preference for meeting the country’s energy needs was still to make greater use of renewable energy, such as wind and sea power. The deal marked a departure for Huhne from his stance in opposition. In 2007 he said: “Nuclear is a tried, tested and failed technology and the government must stop putting time, effort and subsidies into this outdated industry.” Nuclear power Chris Huhne Energy industry Energy Japan disaster Natural disasters and extreme weather Toby Helm guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Japan’s exhausted nuclear staff make breakthrough

A fearless band of scientists and workers trying to stop a meltdown have inspired the entire country Exhausted engineers attached a power cable to the outside of Japan’s tsunami-crippled nuclear plant on Saturday. The operation raised hopes that it may be possible to restart the pumping of water into the plant’s stricken reactors this weekend and cool down its overheated fuel rods before there are more fires and explosions. “We have connected the external transmission line with the receiving point of the plant and confirmed that electricity can be supplied,” said a spokesman for the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co, in a statement. However, officials said further cabling would have to be completed before they made an attempt to restart the water pumps at the Fukushima plant, 150 miles north of Tokyo. It was also reported that health workers had detected radiation levels above safety limits in milk and spinach from farms in Fukushima and in neighbouring Ibaraki, although it was claimed they represented no risk to human health. Officials have asked people living near the plant to follow basic safety advice when going outside: drive, don’t walk; wear a mask; wear long sleeves; don’t go out in the rain. Radiation levels in Tokyo were also said to be within safe limits. Nevertheless, the city has seen an exodus of tourists, expatriates and many Japanese, who fear a blast of radioactive material from Fukushima. At the nuclear plant, firefighters continued to spray water to cool the dangerously overheated fuel rods in order to keep cores in its reactors from overheating and melting. The UN’s atomic agency said yesterday that conditions at the plant remained grave but not deteriorating badly, following Japan’s decision on Friday to raise the severity rating of the nuclear crisis from level 4 to level 5 on the seven-level international scale. It put the Fukushima fires on a par with the Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania in the US in 1979. The explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 – which sent a plume of radioactive material into the skies 25 years ago – is the only incident to have reached level 7. Fires and explosions occurred at four of the six reactors at Fukushima last week after the 8.9 Richter earthquake and the ensuing tsunami that hit Japan on 11 March. The earthquake triggered an automatic shutdown of the three reactors that were in operation. The tsunami then damaged diesel generators that were providing back-up power for the pumps driving coolant through these reactors. As a result, heat could no longer be pumped away and temperatures inside the reactors’ cores began to rise, eventually setting off a series of chemical fires. “Hollow rods made of zirconium hold each reactor’s uranium fuel pellets in place,” said Professor Andrew Sherry, director of the Dalton Nuclear Institute in Manchester. “When temperatures rise too much, that zirconium starts to react with the reactor’s water. This chemical reaction raises temperatures even further. Hydrogen is also produced. When this hydrogen exploded, it destroyed the buildings that act as each reactor’s outer protective shell.” The explosions also damaged two storage tanks in which fuel rods – still hot because of the radioactive material inside them – were being stored in water. Water levels dropped, exposing fuel rods and triggering further chemical reactions between zirconium fuel cladding and the steam that had begun to build up. These set off fires in storage tanks at reactors three and four. As a result, plant workers, emergency services personnel and scientists have been battling for the past week to restore the pumping of water to the Fukushima nuclear plant and to prevent a meltdown at one of the reactors. A team of about 300 workers – wearing masks, goggles and protective suits sealed with duct tape and known as the Fukushima 50 because they work in shifts of 50-strong groups – have captured the attention of the Japanese who have taken heart from the toil inside the wrecked atom plant. “My eyes well with tears at the thought of the work they are doing,” Kazuya Aoki, a safety official at Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, told Reuters. Little is known about this band of heroes, except for the few whose relatives have spoken to the Japanese media. One woman said that her father, who had worked for an electricity company for 40 years and who was due to retire in September, had volunteered. “I feel it’s my mission to help,” he told his daughter. On Wednesday, the government raised the cumulative legal limit of radiation that the Fukushima workers could be exposed to from 100 to 250 millisieverts. That is more than 12 times the annual legal limit for workers dealing with radiation under British law. Each team works as fast as possible for the briefest of periods. The pilots of the helicopters used to “water-bomb” the plant have been restricted to missions lasting less than 40 minutes. Nevertheless, the workers have not only managed to link a power cable to one of the plant’s reactors, No 2, but they have also connected diesel generators to the No 5 and No 6 reactors, which have so far not suffered serious damage. “If they are successful in getting the cooling infrastructure up and running, that will be a significant step forward in establishing stability,” said Eric Moore, a nuclear power expert at US-based FocalPoint Consulting Group. However, the government has conceded that it was too slow in dealing with the crisis at Fukushima. Chief cabinet secretary Yukio Edano said that “in hindsight, we could have moved a little quicker in assessing the situation and co-ordinating all that information, and provided it faster”. The fires at Fukushima have also triggered serious criticism of the plant’s design. The decision to place storage tanks close to reactors has been pinpointed as a key design error. When those reactors caught fire, they quickly triggered reactions in the storage tanks which themselves caught fire, and so the fires spread. In addition, the failure to build defences that could withstand the huge tsunami that struck Japan has also been attacked. “The geological evidence in Japan indicates a history of giant tsunamis over the past several thousand years,” said Professor Rolf Aalto, an Exeter University expert on tsunamis. “Unfortunately, an engineering and political decision was made to design protection and plan cities around a hypothesized five-metre tsunami – about the size of those experienced in Japan over the last century. However, it was not a surprise to geologists that a tsunami two to three times larger appeared. Both the earthquake and tsunami were exceptional, but were both well within the realm of what can occur within that tectonic setting.” However, Professor Sherry defended the ageing plant – whose six reactors came on line between 1970 and 1979. “These reactors were designed in the 1960s and we have learned a lot since then. Modern plants are much safer. Think of cars in the 1960s: they didn’t have crumple zones, airbags or seat belts – features we all take for granted today. It is the same with nuclear reactor design.” The Fukushima reactors, known as boiling water reactors, have active safety features – you have to do something to prevent dangerous heating, such as ensuring that the pumps are activated. “By contrast, new reactors are designed to include ‘passive’ safety systems that are designed to shut down and cool fuel without the need for power being available at the plant,” said Barry Marsden, professor of Nuclear Graphite Technology at Manchester University. Modern reactors also have double or triple back-up safety systems. It remains to be seen if such reassurances will have an impact. The sight of explosions erupting from the reactors last week have done nothing for the prospects of the world’s nuclear industry. It had been gearing up for a restoration of its fortunes, with governments across the planet turning to the power of the atom as a future energy source – one that does not pose major climate change risks. It now looks like a tarnished option, or at least that is how it will be portrayed by those who oppose an expansion of atom plant construction. “European leaders must take note of the growing nuclear crisis in Japan, and act now,” said Patricia Lorenz, nuclear campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe. “Europe needs a phase-out plan for nuclear, and must open the way for safe solutions to climate change and energy security.” Last week, the German government suspended its approval process for new nuclear construction projects. More significantly, China – the world’s leader in nuclear expansion, with 28 plants under construction – followed suit. Whether these suspensions will last long is a different matter. Much depends on the success of the Fukushima 50 and their bid to complete a power link between the stricken plant and the outside world. Failure would certainly do little for the reputation of nuclear power. Japan disaster Japan Natural disasters and extreme weather Nuclear power Robin McKie guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Japan’s exhausted nuclear staff make breakthrough

A fearless band of scientists and workers trying to stop a meltdown have inspired the entire country Exhausted engineers attached a power cable to the outside of Japan’s tsunami-crippled nuclear plant on Saturday. The operation raised hopes that it may be possible to restart the pumping of water into the plant’s stricken reactors this weekend and cool down its overheated fuel rods before there are more fires and explosions. “We have connected the external transmission line with the receiving point of the plant and confirmed that electricity can be supplied,” said a spokesman for the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co, in a statement. However, officials said further cabling would have to be completed before they made an attempt to restart the water pumps at the Fukushima plant, 150 miles north of Tokyo. It was also reported that health workers had detected radiation levels above safety limits in milk and spinach from farms in Fukushima and in neighbouring Ibaraki, although it was claimed they represented no risk to human health. Officials have asked people living near the plant to follow basic safety advice when going outside: drive, don’t walk; wear a mask; wear long sleeves; don’t go out in the rain. Radiation levels in Tokyo were also said to be within safe limits. Nevertheless, the city has seen an exodus of tourists, expatriates and many Japanese, who fear a blast of radioactive material from Fukushima. At the nuclear plant, firefighters continued to spray water to cool the dangerously overheated fuel rods in order to keep cores in its reactors from overheating and melting. The UN’s atomic agency said yesterday that conditions at the plant remained grave but not deteriorating badly, following Japan’s decision on Friday to raise the severity rating of the nuclear crisis from level 4 to level 5 on the seven-level international scale. It put the Fukushima fires on a par with the Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania in the US in 1979. The explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 – which sent a plume of radioactive material into the skies 25 years ago – is the only incident to have reached level 7. Fires and explosions occurred at four of the six reactors at Fukushima last week after the 8.9 Richter earthquake and the ensuing tsunami that hit Japan on 11 March. The earthquake triggered an automatic shutdown of the three reactors that were in operation. The tsunami then damaged diesel generators that were providing back-up power for the pumps driving coolant through these reactors. As a result, heat could no longer be pumped away and temperatures inside the reactors’ cores began to rise, eventually setting off a series of chemical fires. “Hollow rods made of zirconium hold each reactor’s uranium fuel pellets in place,” said Professor Andrew Sherry, director of the Dalton Nuclear Institute in Manchester. “When temperatures rise too much, that zirconium starts to react with the reactor’s water. This chemical reaction raises temperatures even further. Hydrogen is also produced. When this hydrogen exploded, it destroyed the buildings that act as each reactor’s outer protective shell.” The explosions also damaged two storage tanks in which fuel rods – still hot because of the radioactive material inside them – were being stored in water. Water levels dropped, exposing fuel rods and triggering further chemical reactions between zirconium fuel cladding and the steam that had begun to build up. These set off fires in storage tanks at reactors three and four. As a result, plant workers, emergency services personnel and scientists have been battling for the past week to restore the pumping of water to the Fukushima nuclear plant and to prevent a meltdown at one of the reactors. A team of about 300 workers – wearing masks, goggles and protective suits sealed with duct tape and known as the Fukushima 50 because they work in shifts of 50-strong groups – have captured the attention of the Japanese who have taken heart from the toil inside the wrecked atom plant. “My eyes well with tears at the thought of the work they are doing,” Kazuya Aoki, a safety official at Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, told Reuters. Little is known about this band of heroes, except for the few whose relatives have spoken to the Japanese media. One woman said that her father, who had worked for an electricity company for 40 years and who was due to retire in September, had volunteered. “I feel it’s my mission to help,” he told his daughter. On Wednesday, the government raised the cumulative legal limit of radiation that the Fukushima workers could be exposed to from 100 to 250 millisieverts. That is more than 12 times the annual legal limit for workers dealing with radiation under British law. Each team works as fast as possible for the briefest of periods. The pilots of the helicopters used to “water-bomb” the plant have been restricted to missions lasting less than 40 minutes. Nevertheless, the workers have not only managed to link a power cable to one of the plant’s reactors, No 2, but they have also connected diesel generators to the No 5 and No 6 reactors, which have so far not suffered serious damage. “If they are successful in getting the cooling infrastructure up and running, that will be a significant step forward in establishing stability,” said Eric Moore, a nuclear power expert at US-based FocalPoint Consulting Group. However, the government has conceded that it was too slow in dealing with the crisis at Fukushima. Chief cabinet secretary Yukio Edano said that “in hindsight, we could have moved a little quicker in assessing the situation and co-ordinating all that information, and provided it faster”. The fires at Fukushima have also triggered serious criticism of the plant’s design. The decision to place storage tanks close to reactors has been pinpointed as a key design error. When those reactors caught fire, they quickly triggered reactions in the storage tanks which themselves caught fire, and so the fires spread. In addition, the failure to build defences that could withstand the huge tsunami that struck Japan has also been attacked. “The geological evidence in Japan indicates a history of giant tsunamis over the past several thousand years,” said Professor Rolf Aalto, an Exeter University expert on tsunamis. “Unfortunately, an engineering and political decision was made to design protection and plan cities around a hypothesized five-metre tsunami – about the size of those experienced in Japan over the last century. However, it was not a surprise to geologists that a tsunami two to three times larger appeared. Both the earthquake and tsunami were exceptional, but were both well within the realm of what can occur within that tectonic setting.” However, Professor Sherry defended the ageing plant – whose six reactors came on line between 1970 and 1979. “These reactors were designed in the 1960s and we have learned a lot since then. Modern plants are much safer. Think of cars in the 1960s: they didn’t have crumple zones, airbags or seat belts – features we all take for granted today. It is the same with nuclear reactor design.” The Fukushima reactors, known as boiling water reactors, have active safety features – you have to do something to prevent dangerous heating, such as ensuring that the pumps are activated. “By contrast, new reactors are designed to include ‘passive’ safety systems that are designed to shut down and cool fuel without the need for power being available at the plant,” said Barry Marsden, professor of Nuclear Graphite Technology at Manchester University. Modern reactors also have double or triple back-up safety systems. It remains to be seen if such reassurances will have an impact. The sight of explosions erupting from the reactors last week have done nothing for the prospects of the world’s nuclear industry. It had been gearing up for a restoration of its fortunes, with governments across the planet turning to the power of the atom as a future energy source – one that does not pose major climate change risks. It now looks like a tarnished option, or at least that is how it will be portrayed by those who oppose an expansion of atom plant construction. “European leaders must take note of the growing nuclear crisis in Japan, and act now,” said Patricia Lorenz, nuclear campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe. “Europe needs a phase-out plan for nuclear, and must open the way for safe solutions to climate change and energy security.” Last week, the German government suspended its approval process for new nuclear construction projects. More significantly, China – the world’s leader in nuclear expansion, with 28 plants under construction – followed suit. Whether these suspensions will last long is a different matter. Much depends on the success of the Fukushima 50 and their bid to complete a power link between the stricken plant and the outside world. Failure would certainly do little for the reputation of nuclear power. Japan disaster Japan Natural disasters and extreme weather Nuclear power Robin McKie guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Minnesota Twins

No Comment

( Minnesota Twins ) – The Minnesota Twins have made roster cuts on Saturday. Infielder Trevor Plouffe, optioning right-handed pitcher Alex Burnett and outfielder Ben Revere to Triple-A Rochester and then Danny Rams was reassigned to Minor League camp. Even though things are changing for the Minnesota Twins there are still a favorite for many. There is one particular fan that was very excited to get to see his favorite team and his favorite player Justin Morneau. This is a 9-year-old boy named Ryan. He will get this chance to be up close and personal with the Minnesota Twins through the Make A Wish Foundation. At the tender age of 2 years old Ryan was diagnosed with immune deficiency. Ryan must get regular infusions so that his antibodies in his blood can be replenished. Though life is hard on him Ryan has kept a good attitude about things and his parents are very proud of him. Getting to go to Florida and see the Minnesota Twins should really brighten up his day! Source : Waggerrun

Continue reading …

Minnesota Twins

No Comment

( Minnesota Twins ) – The Minnesota Twins have made roster cuts on Saturday. Infielder Trevor Plouffe, optioning right-handed pitcher Alex Burnett and outfielder Ben Revere to Triple-A Rochester and then Danny Rams was reassigned to Minor League camp. Even though things are changing for the Minnesota Twins there are still a favorite for many. There is one particular fan that was very excited to get to see his favorite team and his favorite player Justin Morneau. This is a 9-year-old boy named Ryan. He will get this chance to be up close and personal with the Minnesota Twins through the Make A Wish Foundation. At the tender age of 2 years old Ryan was diagnosed with immune deficiency. Ryan must get regular infusions so that his antibodies in his blood can be replenished. Though life is hard on him Ryan has kept a good attitude about things and his parents are very proud of him. Getting to go to Florida and see the Minnesota Twins should really brighten up his day! Source : Waggerrun

Continue reading …