Saturday 26 March will see Britain’s largest single protest since the anti-Iraq war march of 2003. Thousands upon thousands will travel to London to protest against a wide range of government cuts. Patrick Kingsley talked to six of them about what they’re fighting for Holly Sprake-Hill, 31, mother, Manchester My four-year-old daughter Willow goes to a Sure Start nursery in Longsight, down the road from where I live in Manchester. I’m protesting about how the council is selling off the childcare element of the nursery. It’s going to have a very big impact on her. We don’t yet have the specifics, but she might have to change locations. At the very least, there will be a high staff turnover, and a decrease in the continuity of care. The council has already offered voluntary redundancies to a lot of the workers, and four of the senior staff will be leaving in April. This will mean she’s not going to get the same people looking after her as she’s used to – and that’s mad. Kids like regular, continuous care with people they know and trust. The quality of her everyday childcare is going to be massively affected. For me, it’s also massive. I work about 25 miles away. So it’s very important for me to know that she’s being looked after in a place that I can trust, is getting quality childcare and good pre-school education. It would change my working life an awful lot, too. I’m a children’s healthcare worker, so I know what effect the loss of these provisions would have on both my child, and the children I work with. But this is just one small part of what’s going on in Manchester at the moment. At least 23 other children’s centres in Manchester are affected. They also want to close down leisure and youth services, there are cuts to libraries, and they tried to close our local swimming baths. It’s ridiculous, because there will soon be a massive public outcry about how there’s nowhere for kids to go. We’ve hopefully managed to save the swimming baths, and we did a lot of local protesting to sort that out. A lot of local schools use that pool. It’s been really important for the community to keep it open. I hope the march will make the government really listen to people. There’s a group of up to 50 people coming down from Levenshulme, which is quite a deprived area of Manchester. We’re quite good at motivating ourselves for protests. It has been a real coming-together of everybody. Yusuf Molade, 17, year 12 student, London I’m going on the march because the education funding reforms are unjustified. I’m worried about the debt I may find myself in after I leave university. There will be the tuition fees of £27,000, plus a maintenance loan, which could be as much as £7,000. So I’ll have £34,000 of debt by the time I’m 22. It’s crazy to say the least. In a recession, we need highly educated workers. But putting up tuition fees to £9,000 a year will achieve the opposite: it’ll ward off a lot of students from going to university. A few people I know have just dropped out of college because of the scrapping of the educational maintenance allowance (EMA), and the rise in tuition fees. They don’t feel the debt would be worth it. I can understand slightly why the government is cutting the EMA. It’s not really necessary after the first couple of months of college, because you’ve bought all your books by then. But it should have just reduced the threshold for the time being – to about £10,000 or £15,000 a year – to ensure that people below that threshold definitely get their £30 a week. The government has talked about replacing the EMA with a national scholarship scheme, where the money is given to the college, and it, in turn, decides what to do with it. But I don’t think that’s a very good idea. It’s better it comes straight from the government because it’s less complicated, and because it’s embarrassing for students to have to go to their colleges and explain their situation. I want the march to make the government recognise just how many people are against them. The government is supposed to represent the people, but we don’t feel it is doing that. It is making choices that we do not agree with at all. That said, I’ll be going with people from my college, and I don’t think we’ll get as big a turnout from there as we did for the protests over the winter. People are quite pessimistic because they feel they’ve been defeated. They think democracy’s a joke, and that the only time they can voice their opinion and hold the government to account is at the ballot box. And, obviously, people of that age don’t yet have the vote. So they’re waiting for the general election in four years’ time. Nora Pearce, 62, midwife, Kingston upon Thames I’m going to be there to defend the NHS. I’ll be with a very large group from Kingston hospital, where I work, and a couple of my grandchildren, and we’ll all be carrying two flipping heavy banners. We feel the NHS is under attack. Before the last election, Nick Clegg and David Cameron used Kingston hospital as a backdrop to say that the NHS would be safe in their hands. But now the government has said the NHS must have £20bn worth of efficiency savings, despite maintaining that no frontline staff will be cut. And at Kingston we have been told that over the next four years we will be losing nearly 500 staff – 20% of whom are nurses and doctors. Now, if that ain’t frontline staff, then what is? The hospital is saying that no services will be affected. Yeah, right. It is also saying there will be no redundancies. I half-believe that, because it could achieve staff reductions through people retiring. But it ain’t about redundancies: it’s about the service. You can’t run a hospital without the staff. At Kingston, we have 22 consultants, and 214 nurses and midwives. They’re not exactly sitting in the cupboard twiddling their thumbs. So I hope the march will make the government seriously rethink these reforms. They just don’t get the ethos of the health service. I don’t know how to say this without sounding pious, but I’ve worked for the NHS for 30 years, and I don’t work there for the pay. I work there out of public duty. People in the health service work much more than their hours. I couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve gone without a break – how many times I’ve worked past the end of my shift when the people I was looking after needed me to stay. The plan to sell off the blood transfusion service, which will be run by private companies for profit, is a perfect example of how the government doesn’t get what the NHS is about: people don’t give their blood for profit. If they bring in all these private companies, pity the poor sod who has got multiple health problems – the private sector won’t want you. They won’t want to do your hip operation if you’re diabetic, epileptic and elderly, because it’ll cost too much money. The other thing that’s upsetting us is our pensions. When they talk about the “gold-plated” NHS pension, I don’t know what Mickey-Mouse world they’re living in. I don’t think a £5,000 pension is particularly gold-plated. A few people in the public sector get very good pensions, but the vast majority of us don’t. Caroline Johnson, 46, care worker, Birmingham We’ve got 15 coaches coming down. There has been a huge uptake in Birmingham, particularly from people working in social care. Every service that provides what we think of as critical help for vulnerable people is suffering massive cuts. Aldridge Road day centre, where I worked, closed in Christmas 2009, and the cuts will lead to more closures of centres for adults with learning disabilities. There are two proposals: one is to put everybody with disabilities on an individual budget, from which they will have to buy their own care; the other is to cut services for people the council deems no longer eligible. There are 4,000 Birmingham service users who will be told they don’t qualify at all. It’s not true that people with critical needs won’t be affected. There’s a very complicated new way of working out whether somebody has critical or substantial needs. On the form, there’s a question: “Does your neighbour do your shopping?” And if their neighbours do, then that would count against them receiving help. What the council’s doing is heartbreaking. Mary Cooke, 72, pensioner, Peterborough A group of us from the Peterborough Pensioners Association have booked seats on a coach. We are concerned about what’s happening in the country. We’re worried about the lack of jobs for young people. We’re worried about our grandchildren, because children’s services are being underfunded. We’re worried about underfunding of adult social care. We also don’t think the plans for a flat-rate weekly pension of £140 are a good idea. Over time, it’ll reduce pensioners’ income. We want the money to be collected while people work. But what is happening to the NHS is the most dreadful thing. We’re especially worried about privatisation and the way the Tories are letting GPs control local funding. We don’t think GPs should be in charge of funding, in addition to the medical examination of patients. We don’t want GPs to be in a situation where they have to make judgments about who they put forward for treatment because they haven’t got enough money. Fancy experimenting with the NHS! How dare they. Leave it alone, and get young people into work. Alex Scott, 26, UKUncut activist, Liverpool I’m coming down with about 50 people from UKUncut Liverpool. The cuts are sure affecting me directly: there are very few chances for employment in Liverpool at the moment. Here, the main employers are the public services, and when I left university last year, I wanted to get a job as either a 999 operator, or with the council. But when the cuts were announced, they closed down all applications. So I couldn’t find a job, and I was stuck working at a Subway shop, which I left to work at a coffee bar – only to lose my job soon afterwards. My girlfriend is also affected – her disability benefits are getting cut savagely. And you can imagine that for someone with mental health problems, this is extremely stressful. As well as her boyfriend, I’m also her carer, and her disability living allowance is where my carer’s money comes from. So I’m living on the goodwill of other people at the moment because the government won’t give me my money for looking after her. And she requires 24-hour care – someone to be with her, especially when she’s going through a very bad phase of depression. Protest Cuts and closures NHS Health Pensions Economic policy Students Tuition fees Social care Public sector cuts Public sector careers Older people Patrick Kingsley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Punch Taverns chief executive Ian Dyson said that the company’s current structure is unsustainable Pub chain Punch Taverns has unveiled plans to split its heavily indebted business in two and hive off almost 3,000 pubs. By demerging its managed pubs from its leased estate, Punch hopes to finally get to grips with the £3bn debt pile that has helped to destroy 95% of the company’s value in the last four years. Chief executive Ian Dyson admitted on Tuesday morning that Punch’s current structure is unsustainable. The company plans to demerge Spirit, the managed pubs division that includes brands such as Chef & Brewer and Bar 38. This will leave Punch with almost 6,000 tenanted pubs which it rents to landlords. It will then sell around 500 of these leased pubs per year, until it is left with a core estate of 3,000 sites. “A demerger will provide the platform to enable both businesses to focus on the very different strategies required to deliver shareholder value and will provide choice and liquidity for investors,” said Dyson, who joined Punch from Marks & Spencer last year. Dyson believes that Spirit will enjoy an immediate fillip once it is released from the shackles of Punch, whose future has been threatened by its debt mountain. Rebuilding the leased pubs arm will take longer, he said. The plan will need the approval of Punch’s bondholders, and Dyson said this morning that he “needs to engage” with them with a view to “optimising the capital structure”. It is not clear how receptive bondholders will be to such negotiations. Punch has reported encouraging financial results in recent months . However, the industry is experiencing a tough time, with cheaper alcohol from supermarkets encouraging thrifty drinkers to stay at home. The company believes that this trend will continue – forecasting a 3.1% per year decline in drinking out in pubs over the next five years. In contrast, it expects the market for eating out in pubs to increase by 3.5% over the same period. Punch grew rapidly through the last decade under former chief executive Giles Thorley. He funded this expansion by borrowing against Punch’s property assets, a process known as securitisation. Thorley was hailed by the City as one of its brightest stars, but Punch’s fortunes crashed as the credit crunch struck. Thorley resigned nearly a year ago , following a £375m rights issue that kept the company running. There had been predictions that Punch might simply hand its leased estate to its bondholders. Dyson said he had considered it, but concluded it was not in anyone’s best interests. “It would remove the opportunity to create equity value in the leased business and would negatively impact the management, operation and valuation of the entire group,” he said. Having peaked at almost £14 in May 2007, shares in Punch fell as low as 35p in early 2009. They rose 2.1p in early trading on Tuesday, to 74p. Punch Taverns Food & drink industry Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cabinet finalises plans to reform student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk ‘crippling’ a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year to the UK economy The outcome of a Whitehall struggle over how far the coalition’s curb on overseas student numbers should go is to be announced on Tuesday. The cabinet is expected to approve the final details of its reform to student immigration amid warnings from MPs that ministers risk “crippling” a thriving industry that is worth £40bn a year. Home Office ministers have made clear that overseas student numbers have risen to such an extent that last year they accounted for two-thirds of the visas issued to migrants from outside Europe. The student route into Britain is now far larger than the number of migrants who come to work or join family members. The home secretary, Theresa May, is committed to reducing overall annual migration, which stood at 210,000 last year, to below 100,000 by the next general election and the curbs on overseas student numbers are regarded as essential to achieve that goal. But the universities minister, David Willetts, gave a clear hint two weeks ago that there were “grey areas” and “fuzzy boundaries” in the policy over which he had yet to reach agreement with the Home Office. He particularly identified the ability of overseas students to bring dependants with them and the post-study work route as areas where the original Home Office proposals were under discussion within government. “It is a feature, but there may be ways in which we can tighten it up or make sure it is not abused or becoming a route to settlement,” he said of post-study work route. “There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo. There are certainly universities that tell us very clearly that if they were completely to lose the post-study work option that would put them at a disadvantage,” Willets told MPs. There has also been intense discussions over how far the clampdown should hit “pathfinder” courses which allow overseas students to improve their English or take A-level qualifications and then subsequently go on to British university degrees. The home secretary has promised that the curb on student numbers should not affect genuine students coming to study degrees at British universities. The Home Office insists that tackling the abuse of the student route will help improve the UK’s reputation overseas as a place of quality education and stricter controls will also protect legitimate students from being ripped off. New examples of abuse of the student route cited by the Home Office last night included: • At Mumbai in India, between September and December 2010, the UK Border Agency had concerns about 200 applications from dependants to join students attending privately funded colleges. When they followed these up, in almost 20% of the cases the student was no longer at the college. • In a study of 454 south Asian students studying accountancy courses about which the UKBA had suspicions, 65% failed to demonstrate the required level of English, and over a fifth couldn’t speak English at all. • UKBA found that a college whose licence has been revoked charged six students from the Philippines a total of £25,000 for a year’s study in health and social care that never took place. The students paid extra on top of this to spend the entirety of their time on their work placements. International students Higher education Students Immigration and asylum Theresa May David Willetts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …