Home » Archives by category » News » World News (Page 1852)

There’s a shortage of Catholic priests these days, and that means that dying Catholics need to plan ahead if they want to get last rites. “Try to anticipate. Look at your last days instead of your last hour,” one hospice minister tells USA Today , adding that sometimes it can take…

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck ‘transitioned off’ Fox News

Network axes Tea Party icon’s daily slot amid mounting controversies and exodus of advertisers Sagging ratings, a string of damaging remarks and an exodus of advertisers have combined to end Glenn Beck’s controversial tenure on US cable network Fox News. The news follows weeks of speculation about Beck’s future, as a campaign to pressure advertisers to boycott the pundit’s daily 5pm slot gathered pace, while Beck himself was embroiled in battles erupting from his often rococo conspiracy theories involving the likes of George Soros and Barack Obama. An elliptical statement by Beck’s production company and Fox News said: “Glenn intends to transition off of his daily programme, the third highest rated in all of cable news, later this year.” But the statement also put a face-saving spin on the decision to end Beck’s show, quoting Fox News’s chief executive Roger Ailes: “Glenn Beck is a powerful communicator, a creative entrepreneur and a true success by anybody’s standards. I look forward to continuing to work with him.” The joint statement mentioned unnamed future “television projects for air on the Fox News Channel as well as content for other platforms”, without giving any detail. Beck himself wasn’t burning any bridges, saying in his statement: “I truly believe that America owes a lot to Roger Ailes and Fox News.” The Glenn Beck show has been broadcast each weekday on Fox News since January 2009, when Beck moved to the network after an ill-fated show on CNN’s Headline News channel. His current contract was due to expire in December this year. The announcement was greeted with joy among Beck’s phalanx of critics on the left. David Brock of Media Matters for America, one of Beck’s most vociferous critics, said: “After losing more than 300 advertisers and seeing more than a million viewers abandon his show, the only surprise is that it took Fox News months to reach this decision.” The StopBeck campaign, designed to lobby corporations against advertising on Beck’s show, welcomed the news with a simple Twitter posting: “VICTORY!” The show’s peak of popularity coincided with the rise of the Tea Party, and his trademark blend of paranoia and conspiracy attracting a wide following – and an equally wide circle of criticism, thanks to often bizarre statements. Beck’s string of eyebrow-raising claims on air includes his 2009 description of Obama as “a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture… This guy is, I believe, a racist.” More recently, Beck held a two-day “investigation” into George Soros, who funds a variety of liberal causes in the US. Beck’s denunciation included reference to Soros’s wartime childhood in Hungary, with Beck claiming: “Here’s a Jewish boy helping send the Jews to the death camps.” Beck’s remarks were decried as “monstrous” by Jewish groups. Beck’s audience has shrunk from a peak of around 2.9 million viewers at the start of 2010 to less than 1.8m, according to recent ratings. On Fox that left Beck lagging far behind the channel’s primetime stars, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. As the audience dried up, so did the advertising. The list of high profile advertisers avoiding his show has grown, and now includes household names such as Coca-Cola, American Express, AT&T and Nestlé. In the UK, where Beck’s show is carried by the Fox News international channel, advertisers are so scarce that the network fills the ad breaks with silent Sky News updates. Glenn Beck Fox Tea Party movement News Corporation US television industry United States US politics Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck ‘transitioned off’ Fox News

Network axes Tea Party icon’s daily slot amid mounting controversies and exodus of advertisers Sagging ratings, a string of damaging remarks and an exodus of advertisers have combined to end Glenn Beck’s controversial tenure on US cable network Fox News. The news follows weeks of speculation about Beck’s future, as a campaign to pressure advertisers to boycott the pundit’s daily 5pm slot gathered pace, while Beck himself was embroiled in battles erupting from his often rococo conspiracy theories involving the likes of George Soros and Barack Obama. An elliptical statement by Beck’s production company and Fox News said: “Glenn intends to transition off of his daily programme, the third highest rated in all of cable news, later this year.” But the statement also put a face-saving spin on the decision to end Beck’s show, quoting Fox News’s chief executive Roger Ailes: “Glenn Beck is a powerful communicator, a creative entrepreneur and a true success by anybody’s standards. I look forward to continuing to work with him.” The joint statement mentioned unnamed future “television projects for air on the Fox News Channel as well as content for other platforms”, without giving any detail. Beck himself wasn’t burning any bridges, saying in his statement: “I truly believe that America owes a lot to Roger Ailes and Fox News.” The Glenn Beck show has been broadcast each weekday on Fox News since January 2009, when Beck moved to the network after an ill-fated show on CNN’s Headline News channel. His current contract was due to expire in December this year. The announcement was greeted with joy among Beck’s phalanx of critics on the left. David Brock of Media Matters for America, one of Beck’s most vociferous critics, said: “After losing more than 300 advertisers and seeing more than a million viewers abandon his show, the only surprise is that it took Fox News months to reach this decision.” The StopBeck campaign, designed to lobby corporations against advertising on Beck’s show, welcomed the news with a simple Twitter posting: “VICTORY!” The show’s peak of popularity coincided with the rise of the Tea Party, and his trademark blend of paranoia and conspiracy attracting a wide following – and an equally wide circle of criticism, thanks to often bizarre statements. Beck’s string of eyebrow-raising claims on air includes his 2009 description of Obama as “a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture… This guy is, I believe, a racist.” More recently, Beck held a two-day “investigation” into George Soros, who funds a variety of liberal causes in the US. Beck’s denunciation included reference to Soros’s wartime childhood in Hungary, with Beck claiming: “Here’s a Jewish boy helping send the Jews to the death camps.” Beck’s remarks were decried as “monstrous” by Jewish groups. Beck’s audience has shrunk from a peak of around 2.9 million viewers at the start of 2010 to less than 1.8m, according to recent ratings. On Fox that left Beck lagging far behind the channel’s primetime stars, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. As the audience dried up, so did the advertising. The list of high profile advertisers avoiding his show has grown, and now includes household names such as Coca-Cola, American Express, AT&T and Nestlé. In the UK, where Beck’s show is carried by the Fox News international channel, advertisers are so scarce that the network fills the ad breaks with silent Sky News updates. Glenn Beck Fox Tea Party movement News Corporation US television industry United States US politics Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

All Alfred Murphy wanted to do was blow his nose, and he ended up in jail. The problem? The paper towels Murphy chose to use Monday afternoon came off a maintenance cart at an Atlanta subway station. A MARTA police officer who spotted Murphy told him he couldn’t take the…

Continue reading …

The US has been conducting an increasing number of Special Ops raids in northeastern Afghanistan to deal with threats that haven’t been seen in years: al-Qaeda training bases. Over the past six to eight months, al-Qaeda has been trickling back into Afghanistan from Pakistan, setting up camp in the remote…

Continue reading …
Ai Weiwei: ‘economic crimes’ claim

Authorities acknowledge police action against artist but still no word about his friend, Wen Tao, who also cannot be reached Chinese police are investigating outspoken artist Ai Weiwei for “suspected economic crimes”, the state news agency, Xinhua, has announced. Authorities had not previously acknowledged police action against the 53-year-old, who went missing on Sunday after being stopped by officials at Beijing airport. The single-sentence report, deleted shortly after it appeared, did not explicitly refer to his detention, and there was no word on his friend Wen Tao, 38, who has also been unreachable since his reported detention on the same day. Earlier, outgoing US ambassador Jon Huntsman had raised the artist’s case in a strongly worded speech in Shanghai, describing him as one of the activists who “challenge the Chinese government to serve the public in all cases and at all times”. The artist’s detention has sparked an international outcry , with the US, Britain and the European Union criticising a crackdown on dissidents and activists. Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, has summoned the Chinese ambassador over the issue. Police visited Ai’s studio three times in the week before he went missing. “He felt a premonition that he would be detained,” his wife Lu Qing told AP. “He told me something might happen to him.” She said she was particularly worried about his health as he takes medication for several illnesses. While Ai had repeatedly clashed with authorities, friends had already warned that this case appeared more serious because police had removed dozens of computers and documents from his studio and had questioned his assistants. Earlier in the day, Ai’s mother, Gao Ying, told Reuters: “I think they detained him for a reason. If they think they have something, it’s certainly a fixed case, an injustice. I think they’ll concoct some things against him.” Gao said she had been “filled with a bit of dread” since Ai angered authorities by listing the names of children who died when schools collapsed in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Officials censored discussion of the subject after public anger developed over shoddy construction. On the Sina microblog, China’s domestic equivalent of Twitter, censors deleted many messages about Ai, and a search for his name produced a warning that results were not shown due to local regulations. But internet users fought back with typical ingenuity. Several used the words “ai weilai” or “love the future” – which looks and sounds similar to his name – to call for his return. One wrote: “I really don’t dare believe that in this society, even love for the future can disappear.” China guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
G20 officer accused of lying on oath

PC Simon Harwood back-tracks on claim that Ian Tomlinson had been acting ‘defiantly’ at G20 protests The police officer who pushed and struck Ian Tomlinson shortly before his death was accused of lying under oath after stating that the newspaper seller had been “almost inviting a physical confrontation” at the G20 protests. Giving evidence to the Tomlinson inquest for the third and final day, PC Simon Harwood initially told the jury that the father of nine had been defiantly obstructing a police line. Tomlinson, 47, collapsed and died moments after the confrontation near the Bank of England on 1 April 2009. Harwood initially maintained he had not pushed Tomlinson from behind – despite video footage that showed he did. His insistence that Tomlinson did not have his back turned when he struck him prompted Matthew Ryder QC, for the Tomlinson family, to accuse him of giving “absurd” testimony. “The problem is that we have video of that day when you were there,” Ryder said. “That is rubbish, I suggest to you, PC Harwood, and you know it.” The police officer replied: “I was there and I saw what I saw.” The judge presiding over the inquest, Peter Thornton QC, told the police officer he did not have to answer any questions he believed would incriminate himself. However by the end of the day, Harwood had back-tracked. After further questioning from Thornton, he accepted that Tomlinson was walking away from police. He also accepted the newspaper seller was not acting “defiantly” and had his back turned to him when he struck him with a baton and pushed him to the ground. When Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan police’s territorial support group, appeared to give the jury a loose explanation of when he could use his baton, Ryder sought clarification. “Does your training tell you if someone is not a threat to you or any other person it is acceptable to baton them? Is that your training? “Yes,” replied Harwood. He believed he could use his baton when not under threat “in some circumstances”. But Samantha Leek, counsel for the Met, told Harwood she was not aware of “any training” that permitted such behaviour. Harwood referred to the instructions on use of force he said he received at the Met’s public order training centre in Gravesend, Kent. Harwood told the jury he had not expected Tomlinson to fall to the ground as a result of the push, which came immediately after his baton strike. Ryder asked: “Someone who has his back to you, you push him with that force, from behind and you didn’t expect he might fall to the ground?” Harwood replied: “No.” The barrister again accused him of lying and asked if the officer had intended to “make an example” of Tomlinson – which Harwood denied. “Because that would be a pretty horrible thing to do, do you agree? Just to make an example of them. Do you agree with that?” “Yes,” said the officer. Questioned by his own barrister, Patrick Gibbs QC, Harwood said he had found it difficult to distinguish in his evidence between his recollections of the day and what he had since seen in video. “It is for me almost impossible, very, very difficult … to be able to ascertain the differences between what I remember then, on the day, to now,” he said. The inquest continues. Ian Tomlinson G20 Sam Jones Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NHS ‘listening exercise’ in doubt

Memo highlights series of government ‘red lines’ under key parts as Labour accuses coalition of public relations exercise A two-month “listening exercise” in which medical professionals will be asked to contribute to a review of changes to the NHS has been thrown into doubt by a confidential memo highlighting a series of government red lines that must be maintained. As David Cameron and Nick Clegg joined the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, on Wednesday to launch the exercise at a hospital in Surrey, the memo by NHS chief executive David Nicholson indicated there may be little room for manoeuvre in reworking the health and social care bill. The memo drew a red line beneath the fundamental planks of the bill that are not for changing: GP consortiums, an independent commissioning board to oversee them, every hospital to become a foundation trust, and Healthwatch and primary care trusts to be abolished by 2013. The memo said there would be delays in setting up Monitor, a regulatory body for bringing competition in the NHS, to which many object, which will slip to July 2012, and the abolition of strategic health authorities will also be delayed to the same date. The memo is likely to be seized on by Labour which says that the “listening exercise” is more of a PR exercise. Cameron, speaking at Frimley Park hospital, said the two-month “pause” in the bill offered health workers an opportunity to amend the government’s plans that will see 60% of the NHS budget handed to GP-led consortiums. Steve Field, former president of the Royal College of Physicians, will chair a hastily assembled forum of medical experts that will report by the end of May or the beginning of June. The prime minister said: “Let me be clear: this is a genuine chance to make a difference. Where there are good suggestions to improve the legislation, to improve the changes, those changes will be made.” But “the status quo is not an option”, he said; the NHS could deliver better care, saving more lives, if doctors rather than “managers” were put in charge. Lansley appeared to indicate on Monday, when he announced the “pause”, that the changes would not be far-reaching when he said the bill would be amended “in the normal way” when it is revived in mid-June. But Clegg made clear on Tuesday that “substantive changes” would have to be made to the legislation. Change to the NHS was vital because of the increasing numbers of elderly people who will need treatment, Cameron said. “If we want to keep an NHS that is free at the point of use we have got to make the NHS more effective,” he said. He claimed the changes were already working, with 3,000 fewer managers and 2,500 more doctors in place, and many more people accessing life-saving drugs through the cancer drugs fund. “But we recognise there are questions,” he said. At Frimley Park, breast cancer surgeon Ian Laidlaw said he was concerned that giving groups of GPs more say in what hospitals do could threaten, not enhance, the latters’ success. The multidisciplinary teams they had built up in cancer care were delivering exceptional outcomes, he told the politicians. “These have been hard won, and I’m really concerned that the commissioning driven by GPs who also hold the budget will look for cost-efficient choices which will fragment the very teams that have delivered the service.” NHS Health David Cameron Nick Clegg Andrew Lansley Sarah Boseley Michael White Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Leslie Ash speaks out over hacking

Actor says the police let her down by not telling her about evidence that tabloid hackers were targeting her The actor Leslie Ash has spoken out for the first time against the Metropolitan police for failing to investigate claims that a private investigator working for the News of the World had hacked into her mobile phone, even though the force had held evidence since 2006 that he had targeted her along with her husband and two children. Ash, a former star of Men Behaving Badly, told the Guardian: “I feel I’ve really been let down. I can’t understand their behaviour at all.” Ash and her husband, the former footballer Lee Chapman, are suing the News of the World for breach of privacy after the Met confirmed in January that in a 2006 raid on the investigator Glenn Mulcaire, it had seized notepads in which he had recorded their mobile phone numbers and those of their two sons. Despite holding that information, which Ash said includes phone numbers for her GP, bank and a teacher at her sons’ school, Scotland Yard failed to tell her that she was a target. “The police were actually withholding evidence,” she said. “I’ve been brought up to trust the police. It’s not a good time for the police at the moment.” Ash became a regular in the headlines as soon as she appeared in the hit laddish comedy Men Behaving Badly, but tabloid pressure reached its peak when cosmetic surgery left her with inflamed lips in 2003 and when she contracted a form of MRSA in hospital the following year. Her family feared she would die. Now Ash says that messages left on mobile phones belonging to her and her children at that time were used by newspapers. “That really came home to me because that is not in the public interest,” she said. “The most painful things … had been said, while I was in hospital, to my kids, to my husband [along with] things really, really personal to my agent – who wasn’t just my agent, she was my friend. “All those worries about if I was going to work again, if I was going to walk again … I just feel horrible thinking that someone’s been able to access my private messages.” Scotland Yard finally confirmed that Ash was “a person of interest” to Mulcaire three months ago. Her lawyer had written to the police last October after she sought a court order forcing the Met to make that information available. Yesterday, Ash accused the Met of deliberating seeking to suppress the truth about the scale of phone hacking at the News of the World by refusing to notify hundreds of potential victims following its original 2006 inquiry, which resulted in the arrest and conviction of Mulcaire and the former News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman. “They are hand in hand with the press,” Ash said. “We’re trying to break through into something that’s basically corrupt.” Referring to evidence given to parliament in 2003 by Rebekah Brooks, the former Sun and News of the World editor who is now chief executive of the papers’ parent company, News International, Ash said: “Rebekah said that day: ‘Yes, we have paid police before.’ That shouldn’t happen. You should be able to trust the police. Who do you trust if you can’t?” A new police phone-hacking investigation, Operation Wheeting, is now under way. On Tuesday the Met made the first arrests in the case since Goodman and Mulcaire were charged nearly five years ago. The News of the World’s chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, and the paper’s former assistant editor (news), Ian Edmondson, were released on police bail without charge. Both men deny wrongdoing. However, Ash said she was not encouraged by the arrests. “No, not at all. They’re just scapegoats. That’s all it looks like to me. The News of the World are going to try and give sacrificial lambs here. They will be happy to draw the line under those two arrests and the police will as well.” Executives insisted after Goodman was jailed that he was the only reporter at the paper who acted illegally, paying Mulcaire additional money on top of his six-figure News of the World contract to hack into messages. It has since abandoned this “rogue reporter” defence in the face of claims made in civil actions brought by a series of public figures that others at the paper were involved. Mulcaire typically wrote the first name of the journalist who had commissioned him to target a particular public figure in the top left-hand corner of his notes. The fact that he wrote “Clive” in his notepad helped to convict Mulcaire and Goodman of illegally accessing voicemails belonging to members of the royal household. Ash said the notes Mulcaire made about her and her family, along with many of their associates, included the name of a person they believe is a News of the World journalist who has been publicly linked with the hacking affair but has not been arrested. Ash said she had feared for years that underhand tactics were being employed by newspapers, including the News of the World’s rivals. Her suspicions were aroused when intensely private stories began to appear, but initially she feared that the stories had been leaked from within her circle of friends. “There were just too many things happening. It’s just certain things that happened at strange times that no one else could have known – especially when I was in hospital. Something came out in the newspaper that no one would have known apart from this friend of mine. When it came out in the paper I obviously thought it was them who had sold it.” Ash is one of around 20 people who are pursuing the News of the World in court, along with other well-known figures including the actors Steve Coogan and Sienna Miller, the former Sky Sports presenter Andy Gray and the football agent Sky Andrew. “The way they’ve done the first investigation [in 2006], the police were obviously trying to keep something very quiet,” Ash said. The former Met police assistant commissioner Andy Hayman, who was in charge of the original inquiry, claimed there were only “a handful” of victims. The Met’s acting assistant commissioner John Yates, who reviewed new evidence unearthed by the Guardian in July 2009 before concluding there were no grounds for a new inquiry, has said on several occasions that the number of people targeted was low. Referring to the number of people suing, Ash said: “Now there are [dozens] of people involved they are not going to be able to keep it quiet because for one person to take the News of the World to court – to sue – would be almost impossible, but now thousands of people are.” Ash also criticised her mobile phone provider, Vodafone, who she says refused to hand over mobile phone records dating back to the time of Mulcaire’s alleged offence. “Vodafone weren’t really helpful to start with. I contacted them. They said I had to get the police to contact our solicitors [to confirm they could release the records]. The police weren’t giving us any information so how were we going to get them to help us?” Friends in showbusiness had warned Ash that hacking was commonplace. “Someone within the PR business just said get yourself a pay-as-you-go phone because they are listening in to things. So we just stopped having conversations on the phone, but it’s quite difficult.” She conceded that she gave interviews to the press during the course of her work as an actor and TV personality but said her treatment in the media was “almost like [being] eating alive. I can’t explain it.” She said her legal action was not motivated by money or a desire for revenge. “It’s not vengeance. Well, maybe a little bit. I can’t lie to you. It really hurt me. Some of the stuff said has really, really hurt me. And if that’s what they wanted to do then they’ve done it. Maybe it is a little bit of payback time. “I want to make sure this is sorted out once and for all. If it is brushed under the carpet and these two guys are the only ones arrested, questioned, they will have a little break – a little sabbatical – and then they will come back and start doing it again. The whole tabloid culture has got to change.” James Robinson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Cabinet secretaries and federal agency heads have begun briefing their employees on what to expect in the increasingly likely event of a government shutdown. According to a Q&A distributed yesterday, and obtained by the Washington Post , employees won’t be able to work voluntarily, and those who do work will only…

Continue reading …