Bright, popular, rebellious and creative, 21-year-old Louise Cattell had everything to live for. Then she made a fatal mistake. She took the party drug ketamine and was found dead in the bath by her flatmate. There are 125,000 other ketamine users in the UK. Louise’s parents want to make sure it never happens to any of them… When Vicky and Ross Cattell woke at the usual time on Wednesday 2 March they had no reason to think the day would not pan out just like any other. They were at their flat in Geneva, where they had been living for just over a year, and their first thought, as always, was for their children in London, Tommy, 23, and Louise, 21. Both, as far as they knew, were still safely in bed, Tommy at the family home in Belsize Park and Louise at her bachelor-girl flat in Clapton, further east. Ross set off for work at Deloitte, the financial advisory firm, and Vicky prepared for her daily exercise routine. Everything seemed utterly normal. Then, just before his 8.30am meeting, Ross’s phone rang with the news that would rip their world apart: Louise was dead, drowned in the bath after taking ketamine, the horse tranquilliser that is currently the “party drug” of choice among young people across the UK. “When I first found out , I couldn’t believe it. I thought there must have been a mistake,” says Ross. “It was the most terrible shock.” Vicky nods in agreement: “You have this nightmare so many times as a parent that something like this is going to happen and then you wake up and think, ‘thank God, it’s not true’,” she says. “The problem is that now it is actually true. The worst thing that could happen has happened and there’s not a thing we can do about it.” We are talking at the Cattells’ house in London just a few days after their daughter’s funeral. It is a lovely light-filled space, full of bright rugs and cushions, books and paintings: an elegant yet unpretentious family home. There are photographs of Louise everywhere: smiling at the camera alongside her brother, her parents and her friends; striking poses in a succession of crazy frocks, her hair a different colour and style in every shot. Beneath the stairs is an impromptu shrine to “our darling girl” complete with scented candles, flowers and yet more photographs – Louise hula-hooping in giant sunglasses and a leopard print mini-dress; Louise winking and pouting in a long black wig and matt black lipstick: Louise with lilac hair in a black corset, competing in The X Factor (she got through to the second round). Among some wilting lilies stands a solitary half-bottle of champagne, its label customised with diamanté studs. Vicky shows me the card tied to its neck. “Dearest Louise,” it reads, “Something to help you on your journey”. Given what she has been through in the past few weeks, Vicky is remarkably composed. So, too, is Ross, who provides coffee and biscuits on a tray, then listens thoughtfully as his wife tells me about the last few weeks of their daughter’s life. Stroking Louise’s cat Pickle on her lap, Vicky recounts how Louise had returned in early February from a month in Australia visiting friends – a 21st birthday trip funded by her parents – and thrown herself into applying to art college. Already established as a photographer and DJ, and with a track record in the fashion industry (she did a foundation course at the London College of Fashion and worked as a production assistant during several London Fashion Weeks for names such as Giles Deacon and Julien Macdonald), Louise had decided it was time to develop her talents as an artist. “She was very, very creative, always artistic as a child, but she’d never focused like this on her art before. She did amazingly well getting her portfolio together so quickly,” Vicky says. “That was what we talked about during the last conversation we had – I told her I was so proud of her for getting it done in time.” It is only when she talks about the night Louise died that Vicky’s voice breaks and the emotion she must be feeling spills over. “She had dropped off her portfolio to Chelsea College of Art the night before and spent the day hanging out in her flat, working in the garden. In the evening three male friends came round to supper. Her best girlfriend, who was living with Louise at the time, was also there. Apparently, they had a nice meal – Louise was a terrific cook – and they drank some wine. At some point in the evening, I’m told, Louise and some of the others took ketamine. “The girls watched TV for a while and then Louise’s friend went to bed. Louise was tired too but didn’t think she’d be able to sleep, maybe because of taking the drug but also because she had things on her mind. She had given up her job [as a visual merchandiser for the fashion chain New Look] before going to Australia and she knew she had to find another one because she had bills to pay. She’d been worrying about that. So she said she was going to take a bath to help her relax. About an hour later her friend woke up and realised straight away that something was wrong. She just had a feeling. She went into the bathroom and found her. She had fallen asleep in the bath and drowned.” Horrified, Louise’s friend called the emergency services who told her how to try and resuscitate her but by then it was too late. The police called at the Cattells’ home in Belsize Park at 7.30am to inform Louise’s brother she had died. “It was terrible,” Tommy tells me over the phone after I’ve seen his parents. “I can see it so clearly in my mind, it is imprinted on my brain. Me in my pyjamas, the policeman and policewoman sitting on the sofa looking awkward and tired, the disbelief I felt in my heart – I just kept thinking it could not be true.” Too shocked to use the telephone, Tommy asked a family friend who was staying at the house to ring Ross and tell him what had happened. Before leaving Geneva, Vicky posted a message on Louise’s Facebook page. “Our darling Louise is dead,” she wrote. “Please help us through this very difficult time.” Within days she had been contacted by hundreds of her daughter’s friends, offering and seeking condolence. On the Saturday after Louise’s death they held an “open house” for everyone who had known her and around 200 people turned up throughout the day. “Obviously our own grief is terrible,” says Vicky. “But for the young people involved it is also incredibly hard to bear. Her friend who found her, the poor girl, I can only imagine what she is going through. We realised we had to support them all.” Because of the scale of the response to her death, the Cattells changed their original plan for a small, private funeral and opted instead for a “big send-off” at Golders Green Crematorium. Upwards of 400 people attended the humanist service, where in place of the usual hymns and prayers there were poems written by Louise’s friends and songs from her Spotify playlist, such as “Sweet Child O’ Mine” by Guns N’ Roses and “Just Like Heaven” by the Cure. The order of service was a fanzine-style brochure again put together by friends, full of touchingly goofy photos of Louise vogueing for the camera in outrageous, barely there clothes, mad wigs and kooky make-up, and with a heartbreakingly simple coverline – Louise 1989-2011 – that brings home the brevity of her life. The service ended with a mass singalong to the theme song from the movie Cabaret “in celebration of Louise’s love of life and karaoke”, which her mother thought a fitting tribute to “someone who never sat alone in her room”. Reading the many tributes on the memorial website set up by her parents, and talking to her friends and family, you get the sense that Louise Cattell was an absolute one-off. “Rest in peace you truly fantastic and much-loved beautiful person,” reads one testimonial. “Louise I’ll miss you for ever. You were the greatest, funniest, most amazing person I’ll ever know. RIP darling. I love you,” says another. And so it goes on. “She was full of energy and fun, she was always smiling and positive and you felt so happy and excited in her company,” says her friend Charlie, who was a classmate at Francis Holland School in central London. “She was a true original.” Her mother recalls Louise going to school aged 12 with green hair, being sent home, only to return with a subtle shade of aubergine, which they let her keep. “I think they secretly admired her chutzpah,” says Vicky. She admits she and Ross always let Louise do “exactly what she wanted to do, to a degree, and there were people, parents of her friends, who disapproved of that. But we tried things like curfews and it was hopeless. We found it worked best for the whole family when we trusted her to use her freedom wisely and she almost always repaid our trust. She got all her GCSEs and A-levels despite running club nights and doing gigs as a DJ from the age of 14. No doubt, there will be people who say all this happened because we let her be too wild but I simply don’t think that is true. Dying your hair a different colour every week and staying out late does not necessarily mean you are heavily into drugs.” Louise was in no sense a habitual drug user. “I’d talked to her about drugs quite a bit,” says Vicky. “She’d come across some quite serious cocaine and heroin addicts on the north London music scene and she said to me, ‘Mum, I’ve seen what drugs can do to you and how they’ve messed up people’s lives, and I’m never going to go there.’ She may have taken the odd ecstasy tablet but she didn’t even like smoking cannabis. I asked Tommy about that the other day – he said she didn’t like the taste.” According to her friends, ketamine was something Louise took on an occasional basis, as many of them do too. “It’s a new thing which is everywhere at the moment. People of my age are all doing it,” says one of her close friends, who is 21. Louise’s brother adds: “I was not surprised to hear she had taken it because it is very much part of the arty, east London scene she was involved in. It’s quite socially acceptable. They all take it, it is definitely the fashionable drug of choice at the moment.” Vicky believes that while young people of Louise’s age are very aware of the dangers of addiction to hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine, they are much less alert to the risks attached to occasional recreational use of ketamine. “We’ve been talking about this to a lot of Louise’s young friends, and I think because ketamine is so widely used and available, despite being illegal, there’s this idea among young people that it is somehow safe, but it is incredibly dangerous. I’ve found it too painful to do too much research into the drug but what I do know is you never know what is in it – and none of the people taking it seem aware of the dangers of using alcohol with it, for example. If Louise had not drunk alcohol, would she still be alive? We don’t know.” Also known as Special K, Vitamin K, Super K and just K, ketamine is actually a powerful dissociative general anaesthetic originally used as a tranquilliser for horses and other large animals, which depresses the nervous system and causes a temporary loss of body sensation. It was briefly fashionable in the 1960s as a psychedelic drug but then largely disappeared from recreational use, resurfacing in Europe and north America during the 90s. It was made a class C drug five years ago, but despite this ketamine now boasts an estimated 125,000 users in the UK, and more users among young people in England and Wales than heroin and crack cocaine combined. In 2008 the British Crime Survey revealed it was the fastest growing “party drug” among 16-24 years olds, leading it to be called the “new ecstasy”. Users taking a small amount experience a euphoric rush which wears off fairly quickly. Larger amounts can cause people to “trip” for about an hour – they call it “going into a k-hole”. Often they experience hallucinations and out-of-body experiences similar to those caused by taking LSD. Some report conversations with God. Because you cannot feel pain when you have taken ketamine it is possible to injure yourself quite badly and not be aware of it. Users may also become incapable of moving while under the influence, again exposing themselves to physical risk. It can cause dangerously high blood pressure if mixed with ecstasy or amphetamines. And, crucially, in relation to Louise’s case, if the drug is taken with other depressant drugs such as alcohol, even a small amount can dangerously suppress breathing and heart function and can lead to unconsciousness. Louise’s brother does not believe she would have been aware of these kinds of side-effects before taking the drug. “I think she would probably have thought, everyone’s taking it so it must be safe. The fact that it is only a class C drug could well have reinforced this view,” he says. David Nutt, the former chairman of the British Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, suggested before he was sacked from his post in 2009 that ketamine should be upgraded from a class C drug due to the harm it can cause to users. However, Louise’s parents are not convinced that a change in classification would have a great effect on the numbers of young people using it. Ross does not believe young people pay much attention to drug classifications anyway. “I think raising awareness is much more important than legislation. Young people need to be more risk-aware when it comes to ketamine,” he says. Vicky has a background in the media and PR – she has worked for the Telegraph Group and was most recently media director for the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development – and she is planning to draw on this to start a campaign to increase awareness of how dangerous ketamine can be. “We’re going to work with some of Louise’s friends and some of my contacts in the film industry to put together a short film using Louise’s life as a showcase, an example of a bright young life cut short, coupled with facts and figures to let young people know what is going on and to raise awareness of the dangers and risks associated with the drug,” Vicky explains. “It is going to be made by young people for young people. It doesn’t need to cost a lot of money. We’ll make it a viral campaign, on the internet, which is where it will reach young people.” Another close friend who did not want her name mentioned claims that Louise’s story has already had a profound effect on people who knew her and even on those who didn’t. “This has certainly woken up a lot of people,” she says. “I know a lot of people who regularly use ketamine who are stopping and thinking about what they are doing. I really want to warn people about it now.” She and other friends of Louise think it is especially important to get the message about the dangers of ketamine into schools and youth clubs because the people taking it are getting younger and younger. “My friend’s little sister who is 14 was caught taking it at school. Apparently loads of other girls in her year had been taking it.” As well as their campaign, Vicky and Ross are planning a memorial gathering for Louise on 21 June. This will be a simple Quaker-like ceremony where people will be able to contribute memories from the floor, after which they will launch magic lanterns over London in her memory. Next year the Cattells will stage a tribute concert to commemorate Louise’s life and highlight the ketamine awareness campaign. “We want to prevent any other young person from having a horrible accident like this,” says Ross. “If any good can come from this…” His voice tails off. In the meantime, he and Vicky are faced with the unbearably painful business of clearing Louise’s flat and tying up the loose ends of her young life, which had barely begun. “I’ve been to her flat once to collect her jewellery,” says Ross. “It was quite tough. But somehow not as tough as going to the bank to close her bank account, or ringing the water company to tell them to stop sending the bills.” Hardest of all was “ringing Ucas and telling them there was no point in progressing her applications to art school any further”. Louise’s brother Tommy doesn’t think he will ever get over her loss. “People say you grow to accept it but at the moment I just feel a really sad feeling in the pit of my stomach all the time. I’d always imagined that in 30 years’ time we would still be going on holiday together, going out of each other’s houses and our children would be friends. Now that’s never going to happen. It makes me feel empty and alone.” www.louisecattell.com Drugs Drugs policy Young people David Nutt Social networking Social trends Lisa O’Kelly guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …With projected A-level grades of three As and a B, this talented student had hopes of reading English at Oxford or Bristol. But the huge influx of students trying to beat the rise in tuition fees has left her and countless others disappointed For as long as I can remember, I’ve wanted to go to Oxford. Martin Luther King had his dream, and I have mine – granted, mine is a lot more egotistical and selfish and not really concerned with social utility, but I’m 17 years old, give me a break. I don’t want to go to Oxford because I’ve had some inspirational chinwag with an eccentric teacher who satiated my growing ego with tales of how much potential I have and how good a writer I am (I am pretty good though, I can paint pictures with words, make them all pretty, like). I want to go there because it’s the best university in the country (excepting Cambridge, but they’re essentially the same thing, let’s call a spade a spade) and, according to universally acknowledged league tables, the best for my subject, which, if you hadn’t guessed from my colourful vocabulary, is English literature. I didn’t get into Oxford and it hurt, but I’m not going to detail my grieving process because it brings up too much buried pain and I’m reserving that material for my therapist. Anyway, it’s not just Oxbridge and it’s not just black students: getting into university this year has been a perilous feat, leaving students depressed, dejected and with a dismal outlook on life. The cap on tuition fees has been blown off like an unruly volcano and now we students are festering in the poisonous lava. David Cameron and Nick Clegg are trying to get ethnic minorities interested in aiming higher, yet their coalition government is allowing the increase in fees and sticking us with the prospect of a £27,000 debt over our heads. So this year, with an unbelievable influx of applicants all trying to beat the hike, all universities have had the undesirable job of choosing the best students out of a pretty indistinguishable pile. And thus we are stuck with a catch-22 where the only way out is a student lottery. Which is why people with higher grades, lower grades and pretty much the same grades as me are getting in, and others with higher grades, lower grades and pretty much the same grades as me are not. And that is just the way the unfair, unjustified and just plain stupid cookie crumbles. The most painful thing about not getting into Oxford was that, at the time, I didn’t understand why. I was predicted A*AAB (which, after the results of my January exams, has now been revised to A*A*A*B – bittersweet, to say the least), I had a strong personal statement, a good reference and a glittering personality (seriously, ask anyone). I met the entrance requirements, I aced the admissions test and my interview went pretty well, too. What went wrong? It wasn’t just Oxford that rejected me, but Warwick, Bristol, UCL and, seemingly, life – life has rejected me and left me a writhing, gibbering wreck with nothing to look forward to except a perpetual cycle of rejection. Hallelujah. Bristol was the worst. With every other university, it was more or less a clean break. It was all “we have received your application” and then – kaboom – “unsuccessful”. But not Bristol, they had to reject me with style. They had to be the rejectors to beat all rejectors. They had to make me want it. They had to make me wait with ceaseless expectation as they tended to my application. Keeping track became like monitoring a disease that got progressively worse, and then, when I had the most chance of recovery, Bristol pulled the plug on my life support machine, leaving me, to all intents and purposes, dead. And I still don’t know why. I mean, running with this disease metaphor, a doctor, while tending to my rotting corpse, would give my family closure, tell them that my application lacked passion or something, so the next time, following miraculous revivification, I would understand how not to die. But none of the universities thought past killing me. I do know, however, that it was not a lack of aspiration that led to these failures. It’s often said that due to a stifling culture that forces black students into not aiming high enough, or aspiring for better than their council flat in Bermondsey or their inevitable descent into gang warfare, ethnic minorities think Oxbridge is an unachievable dream. Well, they don’t. It’s not a case of black people seeing a mass of impenetrable whiteness at Russell Group universities and therefore being scared out of applying. I mean, we got a man on the moon. We didn’t let our fear of aliens stop us from breakdancing on that over-sized lump of rock, did we? Well, I mean “we” as a collective human race, not “you and me”, unless you happen to be Neil Armstrong. Ethnic minorities won’t succumb to not succeeding just because they’ve been dissuaded by a couple of secondary school teachers; if there’s something to aspire to, people aspire. I aimed high, and am from a generation that consistently dares to be better and achieve greater things, especially in the face of adversity. I aimed even higher when I was selected by the Social Mobility Foundation (SMF) – because I’m high-achieving, but underprivileged (yippee, I think) – for special mentoring. I still had to apply, though – you’d think being selected would grant me immunity from having to fill out the application form, but no such luck. I was paired with an amazing mentor called Ajay, who went to Cambridge and got a first in history and is now a journalist. This made me plan out the next decade of my life as such: go to Oxford, get a first-class degree, become a journalist, be amazing. As a mentor, Ajay gave me advice about applications and emailed cyber slaps whenever I was freaking out about life, the universe and everything. The SMF set me up with a wealth of interview preparation sessions and got speakers to come in and talk to us about careers, so I was pretty confident when, in wintry December, I had my interview at Oxford. It went well. You can’t hear my tone, so I’m going to have to state that I am not being sarcastic, it actually did go pretty well. When I got to Oxford, it was initially rather calamitous because I tried to make friends with some international students who probably thought I was an alien (with the blue hair and everything) and promptly ran away, and I couldn’t talk to anyone else because they were all sitting in fully formed circles in the junior common room, so I went to bed thinking, “Gah! Oxford is terrible!” But then I woke up and it was like it never happened. I met the rest of the English students and we bonded before our interviews and there was a really nice atmosphere because we swore that we would be best friends for ever. Except we can’t now, because Oxford has dashed my dreams of world domination. And having wicked cool friends. I had two interviews over consecutive days, each with two tutors. I’d been prepared for the old “So, why do you want to read English?” question, which, of course, they didn’t ask (because that was what my personal statement was answering). I was expecting a sort of “good cop, bad cop” operation, where one tutor would ask me where Leo Tolstoy spent his pocket money as a child while snarling at me, and the other would counter with “Now, tell me, what is a rhyming couplet?” Instead, the first tutor discussed a poem with me (it wasn’t a very good poem), then the second tutor and I discussed the socio-economic state of India in The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy and other examples in literature where a character has failed to adapt to changing situations. I even slipped in some background reading I’d done by way of an essay by Roland Barthes called “The Death of the Author”. They were smiling and nodding like Cheshire cats on acid when they heard that. In the second interview, I quoted the introduction of Lolita because it’s my favourite part of the novel and I like quoting things, and I linked the language used in Lolita to the grandiose language of Othello , which is my A-level text. Granted, I did confuse “Ode to a Nightingale” with “Ode on a Grecian Urn”, but it wasn’t as though I thought Charlotte Brontë wrote Hamlet or anything and I corrected myself and continued with my analysis of Romantic literature. I thought I did pretty well. Although I probably saw about one other black person while I was in Oxford, I didn’t feel like a minority. I remember meeting a German guy called Florian who was applying for linguistics – we had an argument over the spelling of “Bach”. It was good times. The only point at which I experienced any discrimination was when my all-male pub quiz team in the junior common room ignored me when I knew the answer to a football question. It’s been a gruelling year for students. Cameron and his cronies need to stop making strange racial assertions about one of the country’s oldest establishments and ensure the radical changes to the education system don’t make students of all colours fear for their futures. Tuition fees University of Oxford Higher education Students guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …With radical transplant techniques and revolutionary formulae for regrowth, men – and the women who love them – may be looking forward to a luxuriantly hirsute future. Tim Lott investigates It is some time now since I started to worry about baldness – somewhere between the retreat of the already fine hair at my temples in my early 30s and the final failing of the last growth of hair at my crown a few years back. I had been trying to convince myself that things might not be too bad for the past 20 years. But at the beginning of this year, at the age of 55, an encounter with a ceiling-mounted mirror revealed to me what was doubtless obvious to others – a
Continue reading …From an exclusive entry in Adrian Mole’s diary to a Bollywood-style film, the Observer commissioned eight of Britain’s most original creative talents to mark the royal nuptials in their own original style. And here’s what they created…
Continue reading …Do real ad men look like Don Draper? How many threats does the Department of Homeland Security investigate on a daily basis? The answers to these questions and more will be discovered with AMC’s first foray into reality TV. The Mad Men network plans two new, real-life series: The Pitch…
Continue reading …Mumsnet poll show parliamentarians lament late nights spent voting on legislation and say the system is still not family friendly Nearly one in three MPs say they have considered quitting because of the pressure on their families caused by long working hours. Politicians complain that late-night votes and the strain of splitting their lives between constituencies and London places them under strain. Despite efforts in recent years to reform House of Commons practices, a survey by the website Mumsnet shows nearly two thirds of MPs believe their jobs have had a negative impact on their family lives. More than 90% of the 101 MPs surveyed said that parliament was not family friendly – a figure indicating that steps such as the opening of a creche for the children of MPs and staff have not succeeded in rectifying the Commons work/life balance. MPs regularly have to stay for late night sittings that go beyond 10pm. And last year a Cardiff Liberal Democrat MP complained it was “crazy” that she had to leave her baby with colleagues during votes in the House of Commons. Jenny Willott said she handed her 18-week-old son Toby “to the nearest MP” to comply with rules that allows only MPs into the division lobbies where votes are cast. The complaints are not new. A number of former MPs have cited the lack of time they are allowed to spend with their loved ones as a reason for their eventual abandonment of a life in parliamentary politics.One veteran MP said: “I never saw my children grow up and I’ll regret that for the rest of my life.” Another MP added: “I am newly elected and cannot see how I can keep this up for the next four years without damaging my family relationships.” Almost half of those MPs asked said they wanted to end late night voting. John Woodcock, the Labour MP for Barrow and Furness, said he had never considered giving up parliament but had grown concerned since being elected in May about the effect of the working practices at the Commons into MPs’ lives at home. Woodcock, Labour’s transport spokesman, who has a two-year-old daughter, Maisie, said: “It is a huge privilege to do the job and I’m working flat out at it. But it inevitably puts a strain on the family to live in two places through the week, spending half the week in the constituency and half the week in London.”Speaking to colleagues, on top of that, the hours of the House of Commons for many people are not geared up to ease family existence for those who have their family in London during the week. Late night votes and meetings leaves them tired at the weekend and that has an effect on life at home.” ” Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, said she had long-contended that reforms were urgently necessary to make parliament more effective. “It is important that we allow MPs family lives because so much policy is centred around family,” she said. “I have for a long time said that MPs should be able to travel back from their constituencies on a Monday and start work earlier on a Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday so they can finish earlier on those days. I think that would make parliament a more family friendly and actually a more effective place.” Despite the concerns, 85% MPs have roundly rejected the idea of parliamentarians having job shares, an idea proposed by the newly elected Green MP Caroline Lucas. Commenting on the survey findings, CEO and co-founder of Mumsnet, Justine Roberts, said: “Making a country or workplace family friendly relies on all of us helping to change the culture around us. If politicians want the country to be more family friendly they need to lead by example, and at the moment parliament falls far short of this. If we want legislation that reflects the needs of families, it seems fair we allow MPs to live as families.The country could waste a lot of talent if we give in to the viewpoint that parliament is no place for a parent with young kids.” House of Commons Daniel Boffey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Poppy Project needs £450,000 of charity aid to survive. Without it, countless victims of abuse will be left to cope alone Mansa, a 33-year-old Ghanaian woman who days ago was close to being deported, has no doubt that the Poppy Project saved her life. “I was ready to kill myself if I had gone,” she said. “I didn’t know what else I would do.” Hundreds of other victims of sex trafficking in Britain may not be so lucky. Shortly after midday last Monday, an email confirmed that ministers were withdrawing funding from the charity, which pioneered specialist services for victims of sex trafficking, and is the biggest and most established organisation of its kind. The government decision immediately prompted a campaign by luminaries such as Professor Liz Kelly, the chair of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, and urgent appeals for donations to help the project continue supporting victims of trafficking. The withdrawal of funding means that the charity requires £450,000 in donations by the end of June to continue. The impact of the funding cut on trafficking victims – an issue that David Cameron says is a “key priority” – is potentially catastrophic, according to the organisation’s case workers. Abigail Stepnitz, the national co-ordinator for the Poppy Project Eaves charity, said that the decision was “politically motivated”. “The government doesn’t like someone who will rock the boat. We were a problem for them in that sense,” she said. Since the charity joined an oversight board two years ago, assessing the government’s compliance on tackling trafficking, it has successfully appealed 17 UK Border Agency decisions on identification of trafficking victims and forced countless reassessments. Last week’s decision has also crystallised concerns that the coalition government does not regard sex trafficking as a priority – regardless of Cameron’s pledges. Stepnitz points to letters from officials, which concede that, while the rape experienced by victims is “unfortunate”, it does not qualify them for government help. Her all-female team of 16 support workers provides around-the-clock support and accommodation for those women who are trafficked to Britain and forced into prostitution or servitude. More than 700 have received help since the organisation was founded in 2003. The organisation’s virtues were underlined by the rescue of Mansa, days before news of the funding decision. In 2003, the Ghanaian had been taken from Heathrow airport to a rural house where she was held and “tortured and sexually abused” over four years. Faced with her deportation, the Poppy Project argued that, after eight years in the UK and with an abusive family in Ghana, she would be better to receive continuing support at its Sheffield office. On the morning of her scheduled deportation flight from London on 1
Continue reading …World’s largest commodities broker rejects claims in leaked review of Zambia operation’s accounts A UK subsidiary of the world’s largest commodities broker helped one of its African mining operations avoid paying tens of millions of pounds in tax, according to charities who have analysed a leaked review of its accounts. The findings of a draft report into internal controls at Zambia’s Mopani Copper Mines plc have been categorically rejected by its owner, Glencore, the giant fuel, metals and cereals trader based in the Swiss tax haven of Zug. The report, seen by the Observer, was carried out in 2009 by a Norwegian subsidiary of Grant Thornton, one of the world’s largest accountancy firms, at the request of the previous Zambian government. Its authors alleged the mine’s owners “resisted the pilot audit at every stage”, a claim denied by a spokesman for Glencore, which owns a 73% stake in Mopani through a company based in the British Virgin Islands, another tax haven. The report claimed there had been an “unexplainable” increase in Mopani’s costs between 2006 and 2008 that allowed it to minimise its stated profits and lower its tax bill. “We suggest the ZRA [Zambian Revenue Authority] does a new tax assessment based on the results of the audit,” the report claims. Glencore, which is preparing a £37bn listing on the London stock market, the capital’s biggest ever flotation, said the auditors had failed to factor in rising fuel and labour costs over the period. The audit also suggested Mopani sold copper at artificially low prices to Glencore in Switzerland under a deal struck with the firm’s UK subsidiary in 2000. The metal was then sold on, allowing Glencore to take advantage of Switzerland’s ultra-low tax regime. There are claims that the transactions breach international rules ensuring there has to be an arm’s-length principle when it comes to sales between related parties. Glencore said all transactions were conducted at an arm’s-length basis and at internationally agreed prices. When asked by the Observer for a response to Glencore’s criticisms of the draft report, Grant Thornton International declined on the grounds of client confidentiality. But charities said the report suggested Glencore had questions to answer. “Based on the Grant Thornton analysis, we estimate that the company’s practices potentially cost the Zambian government up to £76m a year in lost corporation tax,” said Anna Thomas, head of tax policy at ActionAid. She pointed out the amount was significantly more than the £59m the UK government gives Zambia each year in aid. The claims have surfaced as Glencore prepares for a listing that will make multimillionaires of the firm’s 485 partners. City analysts were astonished to learn the extent to which the company dominates the commodity markets in documents published ahead of the listing. Glencore revealed it controlled 60% of the traded zinc market and 50% of copper. Development charities have contrasted the impending wealth of the company’s management with the poverty of Zambians, around two thirds of whom live below the recognised poverty line, according to the United Nations. The leaking of the report is potentially embarrassing for European governments. Mopani received a €48m development loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB) to help bring prosperity to Zambia. But the report states: “The pilot audit has shown there is a high need for a determined effort at collecting the taxes that are assessed under the laws implemented by the Zambian government.” The EIB has informed OLAF (the European anti-fraud office) of the report’s allegations and launched an investigation. Emmanuel Mutati, CEO of Mopani, has described the audit as “flawed and incomplete” saying it did not include a series of third-party transactions that would affect its accounts. “We have also been audited by independent auditors annually,” Mutati said. “Every year the independent auditors’ report has given Mopani a clean bill of health.” The UK government recently called for new measures to ensure that the poorest people in Africa benefited from mining. Glencore was founded by Marc Rich, the controversial oil trader who was accused of tax evasion by American authorities but was pardoned by President Clinton on his last day in office. The company, which last year had a turnover of $145bn, is no longer connected to Rich. The Zambian government has declined to investigate Mopani’s tax affairs despite calls from development charities. “We are disappointed with the government’s lukewarm reaction,” said Savior Mwambwa, executive director of the Centre for Trade Policy and Development, Zambia. “They need to take action and change the whole taxation system.” Mining Zambia Jamie Doward guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Oscar-winning actor Cage taken into custody in New Orleans after allegedly grabbing his wife and damaging parked cars Actor Nicolas Cage has been arrested on suspicion of domestic abuse after an allegedly drunken altercation with his wife. The Oscar-winning actor was taken into custody in New Orleans on Friday after he was said to have grabbed his wife, Alice Kim, and damaged parked cars during an argument about where they were staying in the city. Cage, 47, was booked on suspicion of domestic-abuse battery, disturbing the peace and public drunkenness, said New Orleans police spokesman Gary Floyd. “[They] were standing in front of a residence that he insisted was the property the couple was renting,” said Floyd. “She disagreed and Cage grabbed her by the upper arm and pulled her to what he believed was the correct address.” He is then alleged to have begun striking cars. “An officer… observed that Cage was heavily intoxicated.” There were no visible injuries to Cage’s wife and the actor was later released on bail. Nicolas Cage Domestic violence United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …