• 2011 profits may be only half of expected levels • Like-for-like sales down 12.6% in last quarter • Ice-cream sales fail to offset fall in demand for chocolate Chocolate maker Thorntons has hit the market with its second profit warning of 2011, blaming the recent sunny weather for a slump in sales over Easter. While most of the retail sector has welcomed the mini-heatwave that bathed Britain for much of April, it proved bad news for Thorntons’ with sales of eggs and other products down. It brought forward its latest trading update to Tuesday morning, after calculating that profits for this year could be just half of the City’s estimates. The warning came just four months after the company blamed December’s snow for a disappointing performance over Christmas. Jonathan Hart, Thorntons’ chief executive, said the company had been faced with “unprecedented weather conditions” during its two key trading periods. “The past quarter has been extremely challenging particularly in our own stores and for franchisees and we foresee the prospect of this weakness in high street footfall and spending continuing,” said Hart. He added that Thorntons had tried to cushion the impact of the warm weather by selling ice-cream at more stores, but this could not compensate for the drop in demand for chocolate. Like-for-like sales at Thorntons’ own stores fell by 12.6% over the last 16 weeks, while trading at its franchises slumped by more than a fifth. Thorntons, which had been expected to announce its third-quarter trading update on Thursday, estimated the pre-tax profits for the current year will be between £3m and £4.5m. Analysts had expected the firm to match last year’s profits of £6.1m. So far this year, Thornton’s comparable sales are 7.5% lower than a year ago. Hart, who joined the firm in January, has promised to deliver a strategic review to turn Thornton’s prospects around. This is expected to include closing some of the company’s 600 stores . Shares in Thorntons dropped 8% to 74p in early trading on Tuesday. Thorntons Retail industry Weather Food & drink industry Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President Asif Ali Zardari hits back at US accusations that his country knew al-Qaida leader Bin Laden was in Abbottabad President Asif Ali Zardari has hit back against American accusations that his country secretly sheltered Osama bin Laden, who was killed on Sunday night, and has claimed Pakistan played a role in leading US special forces to the al-Qaida leader. “Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing,” Zardari said. “Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact.” It was the first high-level rebuttal by the Pakistani government after a day of trenchant criticism from US commentators and officials , who questioned how the Saudi fugitive managed to live for years in a wealthy suburb close to one of Pakistan’s most prestigious military facilities. The dramatic 40-minute air assault that killed Bin Laden was carried out by US Navy Seals who crossed from Afghanistan in four helicopters and targeted a house in Abbottabad, a two-hour drive north of Islamabad. The spacious $1m (£600,000) compound is located a few streets from the Pakistan Military Academy , the country’s equivalent of Sandhurst or West Point. “People have been referring to this as hiding in plain sight. We are looking at how he was able to hide out there for so long,” said White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan. It was “inconceivable” that Bin Laden did not enjoy a “support system” in Pakistan, he said. Writing in the Washington Post , Zardari said his country was “the world’s greatest victim of terrorism”, called Bin Laden “the source of the greatest evil of the new millennium”, and claimed that Pakistan had played a role in identifying the al-Qaida courier who ultimately led US forces to Bin Laden. “Although the events of Sunday were not a joint operation, a decade of co-operation and partnership between the United States and Pakistan led up to the elimination of Osama bin Laden as a continuing threat to the civilised world,” he said. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, perhaps anxious not to alienate a partner still vital to actions against al-Qaida, appeared to partly agree. “In fact, co-operation with Pakistan helped lead us to Bin Laden and the compound in which he was hiding,” she said. Zardari’s comments will please Pakistan’s powerful military, the real target of American accusations of double-dealing. The army’s spokesman has been silent over the Abbottabad operation, although senior officials from Pakistan’s ISI intelligence agency insisted they had not been informed beforehand. The army faces many questions as well as anger over the breach of sovereignty, including how a fleet of US helicopters managed to fly through Pakistan’s air defences and return to Afghanistan unhindered. Precise details about Bin Laden’s final moments are still emerging. US officials said he was killed by gunfire in the final stages of the 40-minute assault, as was one of his sons and his youngest wife. The White House claimed she had been used by Bin Laden as a human shield. Bin Laden, codenamed Geronimo for the operation, was shot twice, in the head and chest. Brennan denied the soldiers were under orders to kill, not capture. “If we had the opportunity to take him alive, we would have done,” he said. After his death soldiers shouted “Geronimo EKIA”, meaning enemy killed in action. His body was taken by helicopter to a US aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf and buried at sea. Barack Obama said: “The world is safer. It is a better place because of the death of Osama bin Laden.” Such was the American distrust of the notoriously leaky Pakistan government that it did not even inform it of the raid in its own territory until after the helicopters had cleared Pakistani airspace. Members of Congress have threatened to withhold economic aid to Pakistan over the affair. Carl Levin, a Democrat who heads the powerful Senate armed services committee, reflected scepticism in the US about Bin Laden’s ability to remain hidden in Pakistan. “I think the Pakistani army and intelligence have a lot of questions to answer given the location, the length of time and the apparent fact that this facility was actually built for Bin Laden and its closeness to the central location of the Pakistani army,” he told a press conference. The US is expected to step up pressure on Pakistan to hand over the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar and Bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, if they are in Pakistan. The death of Bin Laden could also lead to a rethink of the scale of the US involvement in Afghanistan. Embassies, airports and defence bases were placed on high alert for possible retaliation by al-Qaida sympathisers. The Pakistani Taliban threatened attacks against the country’s government and military, and the US. In a phone call to Reuters, a spokesman said: “Now Pakistani rulers, President Zardari and the army will be our first targets. America will be our second target”. The US embassy and its three consulates in Pakistan were closed to the public until further notice. David Cameron warned of a continuing threat from “extremist terrorism” but hailed a “massive step forward”. The mood in the US was one of celebration as Americans gathered at Ground Zero in New York , pleased finally to have retribution. Obama will visit the site of the World Trade Centre on Thursday to meet the families of those killed in the September 11 attacks. Clinton suggested that US policy on Afghanistan would not shift, but other officials hinted the dynamics may have changed. The Pentagon only wants to see a token force of a few thousand withdrawn beginning in the summer, but Obama may want a more significant reduction. An Afghan government official said he feared Bin Laden’s death would give “justification for US premature disengagement from the region”. It was a view echoed by Ahmed Wali Massoud, an Afghan politician and brother of Ahmed Shah Massoud, the legendary resistance fighter who was assassinated just two days before the September 11 attacks on the orders of Bin Laden. “Already the US has been thinking about shifting its policy on the war on terror and there is a risk that the American public will continue to question why their troops are still fighting there,” he said. One of the most senior US officers serving in Afghanistan, General William Caldwell, told the Guardian the death might encourage moderate elements within the Taliban to give up. John Taylor, whose daughter Carrie, 24, was killed in the 7/7 bombings in London in 2005, said he would be celebrating. “This is poetic justice for my daughter. This is a little piece of justice for Carrie and the thousands around the world who have been killed as a result of [Bin Laden's] actions.” Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Pakistan United States Global terrorism US national security US foreign policy US military Afghanistan Declan Walsh Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Discovery of audio recorder two days after flight data recorder brings investigators closer to cause of June 2009 crash Search parties scouring the seabed off Brazil’s north-east coast have recovered the second of two flight recorders from the Air France aircraft that crashed into the Atlantic in June 2009, investigators have said. The discovery of the audio recorder, two days after the flight data recorder was fished up, brings investigators even closer to the cause of the crash as it should hold recordings of cockpit conversations during the flight’s final moments. “We can now hope to find out what truly happened within the next three weeks,” the French transport minister, Thierry Mariani, told RTL radio on Tuesday. The investigation team identified the cockpit voice recorder at 9.50pm GMT on Monday , France’s BEA air accident inquiry office said in a statement. The device was hauled up to the team’s ship at 2.40am GMT on Tuesday. A BEA spokeswoman said the black box would be shipped back to France, probably by the end of next week. “The outside appears to be in relatively good shape,” she said, adding that it would only be possible to see if the recorder was “usable” once it was opened, which would not happen until it was back in France. A photograph of the recorder on BEA’s website shows a bright orange cylindrical device that looks scuffed and battered but otherwise intact. So-called black boxes are painted orange so that they can be spotted more easily in wreckage. The Airbus 330-203 airliner plunged into the sea off Brazil en route to Paris from Rio de Janeiro in June 2009 after running into stormy weather, killing all 228 passengers and crew. The discovery of the two flight recorders follows nearly two years of on-off search efforts over a 10,000 sq km area of seabed. Theories about the cause of the disaster have focused on the possible icing up of the aircraft’s speed sensors, which seemed to give inconsistent readings before communication was lost. Depending on how much data can be retrieved and how clearly it pinpoints the cause of the crash, lawyers say information from the black boxes could lead to a flood of liability claims. Any fresh conclusions on the cause will also be fed into a judicial probe already under way in which Airbus and Air France have both been placed under formal investigation. Plane crashes Air transport Airbus France guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Discovery of audio recorder two days after flight data recorder brings investigators closer to cause of June 2009 crash Search parties scouring the seabed off Brazil’s north-east coast have recovered the second of two flight recorders from the Air France aircraft that crashed into the Atlantic in June 2009, investigators have said. The discovery of the audio recorder, two days after the flight data recorder was fished up, brings investigators even closer to the cause of the crash as it should hold recordings of cockpit conversations during the flight’s final moments. “We can now hope to find out what truly happened within the next three weeks,” the French transport minister, Thierry Mariani, told RTL radio on Tuesday. The investigation team identified the cockpit voice recorder at 9.50pm GMT on Monday , France’s BEA air accident inquiry office said in a statement. The device was hauled up to the team’s ship at 2.40am GMT on Tuesday. A BEA spokeswoman said the black box would be shipped back to France, probably by the end of next week. “The outside appears to be in relatively good shape,” she said, adding that it would only be possible to see if the recorder was “usable” once it was opened, which would not happen until it was back in France. A photograph of the recorder on BEA’s website shows a bright orange cylindrical device that looks scuffed and battered but otherwise intact. So-called black boxes are painted orange so that they can be spotted more easily in wreckage. The Airbus 330-203 airliner plunged into the sea off Brazil en route to Paris from Rio de Janeiro in June 2009 after running into stormy weather, killing all 228 passengers and crew. The discovery of the two flight recorders follows nearly two years of on-off search efforts over a 10,000 sq km area of seabed. Theories about the cause of the disaster have focused on the possible icing up of the aircraft’s speed sensors, which seemed to give inconsistent readings before communication was lost. Depending on how much data can be retrieved and how clearly it pinpoints the cause of the crash, lawyers say information from the black boxes could lead to a flood of liability claims. Any fresh conclusions on the cause will also be fed into a judicial probe already under way in which Airbus and Air France have both been placed under formal investigation. Plane crashes Air transport Airbus France guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …John Catt, aged 86, has had his presence at peaceful protests systematically logged by secretive police unit over four years An 86-year-old man has been granted permission to launch a lawsuit against police chiefs who have classified him as a “domestic extremist” and kept a detailed record of his political activities on a clandestine database. John Catt, who has no criminal record, is bringing the high court action against a secretive police unit which systematically logged his presence at more than 55 peace and human rights protests over a four-year period. Some of the entries record his habit of taking out his sketch pad and drawing the scene at demonstrations. Other entries contain notes on his appearance – such as “clean shaven” – and the slogans on his clothes. His lawsuit will challenge the power of police to compile secret files on law-abiding protesters. A victory for Catt, a pensioner who lives in Brighton, would be a further blow to the police unit, which has been criticised for using undercover officers to infiltrate protest groups. The exposure of spies such as Mark Kennedy, who spent seven years working undercover in the environmental movement, has highlighted the way in which the National Public Order Intelligence Unit has been carrying out surveillance of protesters. The unit has been compiling a huge, nationwide database of thousands of protesters for more than a decade, drawing on intelligence from undercover officers, uniformed surveillance teams, informants in protest groups and covert intercepts. Police claim the unit only monitors so-called “domestic extremists”, whom they define as hardcore activists who commit crime to further their political aims. Catt, a campaigner for many years, is one of the few activists confirmed to be on the database. He says he is “committed to protesting through entirely peaceful means” and told the Guardian he was “shocked and terrified” after he saw the extent of the files held on him. He obtained them using the Data Protection Act. In legal papers, he describes how the files record the political aims of the demonstrations he attended between 2005 and 2009, “highly personalised” information about his appearance and “hearsay evidence and police officers’ opinions”. At a protest against Guantánamo Bay organised by Sussex Action for Peace on 25 September 2005, police noted: “John CATT was seen wearing a Free Omar T-shirt, he was clean shaven … John CATT was very quiet and was holding a board with orange people on it.” At another protest on 10 March 2006, police recorded: “John CATT arrived in his white Citroën Berlingo van. He removed several banners for the protesters to use and at the completion of the demo returned the same to the van. He was using his drawing pad to sketch a picture of the protest and the police presence.” On another occasion he was logged as having “sat on a folding chair and appeared to be sketching” at a demonstration. Police tracked his van after noticing it at demonstrations. He and his daughter Linda were stopped and searched one Sunday morning in London by police who were alerted by a roadside camera recognising the van’s number plate. The pair had been on their way to help a family member move house. Catt, who is represented by the London law firm Fisher Meredith, has been given permission by a high court judge to take legal action against police chiefs, as he claims they have violated his human rights by keeping “excessive and irrelevant” secret files on him. He wants all the entries concerning him to be permanently deleted. Police chiefs say they are legally entitled to maintain files on Catt, who has been taking part in a campaign to close down a Brighton arms factory owned by an American firm, EDO MBM Technology. According to police, the Smash EDO group has organised a “campaign of illegality designed to pressurise EDO to cease its lawful business”, leading to “169 convictions including criminal damage and aggravated trespass, assault and harassment of staff”. The “minor” surveillance of Catt is justified, they say, because his “voluntary association at the Smash EDO protests forms part of a far wider picture of information which it is necessary for the police to continue to monitor in order to plan to maintain the peace, minimise the risks of criminal offending and adequately to detect and prosecute offenders”. Police Human rights Activism Protest Surveillance Rob Evans Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …John Catt, aged 86, has had his presence at peaceful protests systematically logged by secretive police unit over four years An 86-year-old man has been granted permission to launch a lawsuit against police chiefs who have classified him as a “domestic extremist” and kept a detailed record of his political activities on a clandestine database. John Catt, who has no criminal record, is bringing the high court action against a secretive police unit which systematically logged his presence at more than 55 peace and human rights protests over a four-year period. Some of the entries record his habit of taking out his sketch pad and drawing the scene at demonstrations. Other entries contain notes on his appearance – such as “clean shaven” – and the slogans on his clothes. His lawsuit will challenge the power of police to compile secret files on law-abiding protesters. A victory for Catt, a pensioner who lives in Brighton, would be a further blow to the police unit, which has been criticised for using undercover officers to infiltrate protest groups. The exposure of spies such as Mark Kennedy, who spent seven years working undercover in the environmental movement, has highlighted the way in which the National Public Order Intelligence Unit has been carrying out surveillance of protesters. The unit has been compiling a huge, nationwide database of thousands of protesters for more than a decade, drawing on intelligence from undercover officers, uniformed surveillance teams, informants in protest groups and covert intercepts. Police claim the unit only monitors so-called “domestic extremists”, whom they define as hardcore activists who commit crime to further their political aims. Catt, a campaigner for many years, is one of the few activists confirmed to be on the database. He says he is “committed to protesting through entirely peaceful means” and told the Guardian he was “shocked and terrified” after he saw the extent of the files held on him. He obtained them using the Data Protection Act. In legal papers, he describes how the files record the political aims of the demonstrations he attended between 2005 and 2009, “highly personalised” information about his appearance and “hearsay evidence and police officers’ opinions”. At a protest against Guantánamo Bay organised by Sussex Action for Peace on 25 September 2005, police noted: “John CATT was seen wearing a Free Omar T-shirt, he was clean shaven … John CATT was very quiet and was holding a board with orange people on it.” At another protest on 10 March 2006, police recorded: “John CATT arrived in his white Citroën Berlingo van. He removed several banners for the protesters to use and at the completion of the demo returned the same to the van. He was using his drawing pad to sketch a picture of the protest and the police presence.” On another occasion he was logged as having “sat on a folding chair and appeared to be sketching” at a demonstration. Police tracked his van after noticing it at demonstrations. He and his daughter Linda were stopped and searched one Sunday morning in London by police who were alerted by a roadside camera recognising the van’s number plate. The pair had been on their way to help a family member move house. Catt, who is represented by the London law firm Fisher Meredith, has been given permission by a high court judge to take legal action against police chiefs, as he claims they have violated his human rights by keeping “excessive and irrelevant” secret files on him. He wants all the entries concerning him to be permanently deleted. Police chiefs say they are legally entitled to maintain files on Catt, who has been taking part in a campaign to close down a Brighton arms factory owned by an American firm, EDO MBM Technology. According to police, the Smash EDO group has organised a “campaign of illegality designed to pressurise EDO to cease its lawful business”, leading to “169 convictions including criminal damage and aggravated trespass, assault and harassment of staff”. The “minor” surveillance of Catt is justified, they say, because his “voluntary association at the Smash EDO protests forms part of a far wider picture of information which it is necessary for the police to continue to monitor in order to plan to maintain the peace, minimise the risks of criminal offending and adequately to detect and prosecute offenders”. Police Human rights Activism Protest Surveillance Rob Evans Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Zardari denies Pakistan harboured bin Laden • Cameron: questions will be asked about Pakistan’s role • Global security clampdown at embassies and airports 8.58am: Welcome to our continuing live coverage of the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden. One of the main subjects today looks set to be accusations that Pakistan had been harbouring bin Laden . Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari dismissed such charges as “baseless speculation”. Writing in the Washington Post , he said: Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing. Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact. Pakistan had as much reason to despise al-Qaida as any nation. The war on terrorism is as much Pakistan’s war as it is America’s. In Britain, David Cameron chaired a 45-minute meeting of the government’s Cobra emergencies committee , and will update MPs on events in a Commons statement later today. Cameron said Pakistan had “lots of questions” to answer. But he warned against a “flaming great row” with Pakistan’s leaders, who he said were committed to tackling terrorism. Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, he said: We should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. But we should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Middle East Pakistan United States Obama administration US foreign policy UN MDG summit 2010 Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Zardari denies Pakistan harboured bin Laden • Cameron: questions will be asked about Pakistan’s role • Global security clampdown at embassies and airports 8.58am: Welcome to our continuing live coverage of the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden. One of the main subjects today looks set to be accusations that Pakistan had been harbouring bin Laden . Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari dismissed such charges as “baseless speculation”. Writing in the Washington Post , he said: Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing. Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact. Pakistan had as much reason to despise al-Qaida as any nation. The war on terrorism is as much Pakistan’s war as it is America’s. In Britain, David Cameron chaired a 45-minute meeting of the government’s Cobra emergencies committee , and will update MPs on events in a Commons statement later today. Cameron said Pakistan had “lots of questions” to answer. But he warned against a “flaming great row” with Pakistan’s leaders, who he said were committed to tackling terrorism. Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, he said: We should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. But we should deal with what we do know. And we do know that the Pakistan political leadership is fighting terrorism, we do know that country has suffered. We should work with those forces in Pakistan that want us to combat terrorism and extremism and make democracy take hold in that country. That is in our national interest. We could go down the other route of just having a flaming great row with Pakistan over this. I think that would achieve nothing. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Middle East Pakistan United States Obama administration US foreign policy UN MDG summit 2010 Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s death is pouring in from around the world—and not everybody’s cheering, Reuters reports: Hamas: “We condemn the assassination and the killing of an Arab holy warrior,” said Ismail Haniyeh, the group’s leader in the Gaza Strip. “We regard this as a continuation of the…
Continue reading …Two killed and 14 injured in New Zealand’s largest city in the wake of tornado which cut a three-mile path across suburb A tornado has ripped across part of New Zealand’s largest city, upturning cars and sending debris slicing through the air. Civil defence officials put the death toll at two, with at least 14 injured. The swirling dark-grey column of air and cloud cut a three-mile (5km) path across the Auckland suburb of Albany at mid-afternoon on Tuesday, tearing off roofs, flattening trees and tossing vehicles around, police and witnesses said. “There were kids in a car which turned upside down and they had to get help,” said Hamish Blair, whose golf supplies store was in the hardest-hit area. “There’s probably six or seven seriously damaged cars, and I saw cars flying off the ground about 30m (100 feet) in the air.” “We’ve got our fingers crossed that injuries are limited and that there are no further fatalities,” Auckland’s mayor Len Brown told Radio New Zealand. The tornado first touched down in Albany and then passed through neighbouring Birkenhead. Most of the serious damage was in Albany, where a shopping mall, a large hardware store and a supermarket were hit. Radio New Zealand reported that the roof of the Mega Centre mall in Albany collapsed. Tornadoes are not uncommon in New Zealand, particularly on the country’s North Island, where Auckland lies. But they tend to be smaller than those seen in the US midwest. Auckland generally gets one or two tornadoes a year, according to New Zealand’s ministry of civil defence and emergency management. New Zealand has been hit by several natural disasters in recent months, including an earthquake on 22 February that devastated the South Island city of Christchurch and killed at least 169 people. New Zealand Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …