• Newspaper seller ‘unlawfully killed’ at G20 protests • Jury took just over three hours to reach verdict • Family breaks down in tears at news • Read our news story on the Tomlinson verdict • Follow live updates and reaction here 3.55pm: Ian Tomlinson’s family will be giving a statement in about 25 minutes. I’ll post an update with the details here. 3.53pm: We’ve just published my news story on the verdict , which recaps the evidence from the hearing and explains how jurors were given two divergent explanations of Tomlinson’s death. The first pathologist to conduct a postmortem examination on the body, Dr Freddy Patel, said he died of a heart attack as a result of coronary heart disease. He was contradicted by three other pathologists who examined Tomlinson’s body, all of whom found he died of internal bleeding in the abdomen. Starmer said last July that complications with medical evidence led him to believe prosecutors were unlikely to prove a cause of death. His decision was supported by the attorney general, Dominic Grieve. Both will now have to consider how a jury of seven men and four women concluded Tomlinson died as a result of being pushed by Harwood. 3.47pm: A quick word on the importance of “unlawful killing” as a verdict. To reach an unlawful killing conclusion, the jury were required to have been satisfied to a higher burden of proof than the other possible verdicts, which could have been reached “on the balance of probabilities”. But to reach the unlawful killing verdict, the jury had to be convinced “beyond reasonable doubt”, the same threshold used in criminal trials. 3.45pm: For legal reasons, the jury was not permitted to name “the police officer”, but we know that he was PC Simon Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Support Group. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, who decided in July last year not to prosecute Harwood for manslaughter, will now be under intense pressure to reverse that decision. An official Crown Prosecution Service review of the decision not to prosecute Harwood is now under way. 3.42pm: The court was caught unaware by the jury’s quick decision. They returned to the room and answered four short questions, known as the inquisition. What was the name of the deceased? Ian Tomlinson. What was the cause of his death? Injury or disease? Abdominal haemorrhage due to blunt force trauma to the abdomen in association with cirrhosis of the liver. If the person died of injury, what were the circumstances? Mr Tomlinson was on his way home from work on the 1st of April 2009 during the G20 demonstration. He was fatally injured at around 19.20pm on Royal Exchange Buildings … This was the result of a baton strike from behind and a push by the officer which caused Ian Tomlinson to fall heavily. The jury said both the baton strike and the push were “unreasonable”. “As a result, Mr Tomlinson suffered internal bleeding which led to his collapse within a few minutes and his subsequent death.” The jury decided that at the time of the strike and push Tomlinson was was walking away from the officer and “posed no threat”. What is the jury’s conclusion as to the death? Unlawful killing. 3.37pm: Ian Tomlinson’s family could be heard shouting “yes” at the verdict. His wife, Julia, six of their children are present at the hearing and have broken down, crying. 3.34pm: The jury has concluded Ian Tomlinson was unlawfully killed by a police officer at the G20 protests. 3.32pm: The jury has taken just three hours and fifteen minutes to reach their verdict. 3.30pm: Welcome back to the Ian Tomlinson inquest blog. The verdict is now imminent. For five weeks eleven men and women have heard detailed evidence about Tomlinson’s death at the G20 protests on April 1, 2009. They heard how he was struck with a baton and pushed to the ground by Metropolitan police officer Simon Harwood at 7.20pm. Tomlinson collapsed just under three minutes later. They retired to deliberate their findings at 11.15am. They are about to come back and deliver their verdict. Police Metropolitan police Protest London G20 Ian Tomlinson Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Did taking out Osama bin Laden have to insult a native American considered a hero by many? That’s what CBS News is wondering since bin Laden was code-named “Geronimo.” Apparently, the “code namers thought of bin Laden as a 21st century equivalent” of the fearless Apache leader who waged war…
Continue reading …A leading white supremacist has been shot to death at his California home and his 10-year-old son has been booked on suspicion of homicide. Jeff Russell Hall, 32, was the regional director of the National Socialist Movement and came to national attention last year when he ran for a post…
Continue reading …In death, Osama bin Laden will be joining Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, and Abu Musab al Zarqawi. Time magazine is putting out a special issue Thursday with a red ‘X” over the terror kingpin’s face on the cover, making him only the fourth such cover star, reports the Huffington Post…
Continue reading …British Prime Minister David Cameron appears close to proposing new TV regulations that would ban gay kissing on all TV programs until late at night, according to press reports. The move is the result of a government review of the effects of “sexually suggestive” TV scenes on youngsters, reports the…
Continue reading …Jason Burke , south Asia correspondent for the Guardian and al-Qaida expert, will be online from 2pm (GMT) to answer your questions on the fallout from Osama bin Laden’s death Question 3 russellbrand asks: Do you think Bin Laden’s death will allow the USA to as such clear the history of their previous relationship and dealings with him? To which Jason responds: Total myth that CIA created OBL. just not true. CIA had no direct dealings with him in 80s, had barely heard of him, dealt just with Pakistanis who dealt with the Afghans not the international brigade (whose military contribution was negligible anyway). How do I know this? lots and lots of footwork in Peshawar and in the US. Absolutely no one – American officials, Pakistanis, former Mujahideen, no one – accepts the whole “blowback” thesis. Question 2 Reader gablac says : My concerns are mainly on “What now?”. The finding of communication equipments in Osama bin Laden’s compound and the tracking of a “courier” to find him out, could prove that OBL was not just a charismatic leader, but also a “strategic” leader. Moreover, he was the focus point fro the fundraiser from the Gulf. So now, what you think could be the future of the linkage between al-Qaida and the Taliban Pakistani groups and the direction of the funding from the Gulf? And, moreover, could a person like Awlaki, that till now, has had a minimum role in the Af/Pak context, take a leading role in the global radicalisation, without a reference point like OBL? Jason answers: Gablac, I wrote about Awlaki in this morning’s paper. I think he’s more likely to move into the spot of most known leader overall if you look at the general jihad movement/phenomenon rather than any formal position within al-Qaida (which he’s not really a part of anyway). As for linkage of AQ and Pak groups – all very ad hoc and personal anyway. So I think very fragmented in the future, based on individual networks etc/room for cooperation, but pragmatic rather than ideological or strategic. Does that make sense? Question 1 Jason Burke is online and starting to respond to your questions. He’ll get through as many as he can, he says, but is also available after the Q&A on Twitter at @burke_jason . A question from citizenbird to start off with: In the recently released Guantanamo files regarding Abu Faraj Libi [al-Libi] , it has been “revealed” for want of a better term that according to Sharif al Masri, that Al Qaeda supposedly has a nuclear device in Europe (which it was alleged that Libi knew the location of) which it will transfer to America in the occurrence of Bin Laden’s capture or death. Is this a viable possibility, or is this yet another case of the Guantanamo files being more of interest in inventiveness rather than actual fact? Jason responds: I think actually, from memory, it was in the file of Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, who was very good at saying exactly what he thought his interrogators wanted to hear and inventing a tonne of plots to get security services all over the world to run around after red herrings … so I don’t know for certain but I’d be willing to bet a substantial amount of money that no bomb in Europe – or anywhere else – ever existed. As reaction to the death of Osama bin Laden continues to fill the world’s news pages Jason Burke, the south Asia correspondent of The Guardian and The Observer newspapers, will be online from 2pm (GMT) to answer your questions about the fallout of the terrorist leader’s death and what this means for the future of al-Qaida. One of the main subjects today looks set to be accusations that Pakistan had been harbouring Bin Laden . Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari dismissed such charges as “baseless speculation”. Jason is the author of Al-Qaeda: Casting a Shadow of Terror and On the Road to Kandahar: Travels through Conflict in the Islamic World. Jason will be ready to answer your questions on this and more: • Will there be a successor to Osama bin Laden? • Does it matter? • Are we too fixated on leadership figures? Leave your questions in the comments below and Jason will join in the discussion from 2pm (GMT) Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Middle East Pakistan Laura Oliver guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Even Rush Limbaugh had some good words for President Obama after the killing of Osama bin Laden, although the conservative pundit’s praise had more than just a hint of sarcasm. “Thank God for President Obama,” Limbaugh said. The military had wanted to bomb the compound, but “President Obama, perhaps the…
Continue reading …Pakistan is going to have to answer some tough questions about whether members of its military and intelligence services knew where Osama bin Laden was, Carl Levin warns. The Democrat, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, suggested that the security arms of the Pakistani government may have known where…
Continue reading …With average tuition fees set to hit £8,700, here’s how to minimise the financial damage while maximising CV gains So much for the government’s estimate that average tuition fees would be £7,500. With the majority of universities set to charge the full £9,000 when the fee cap is removed next year, the actual average currently stands more than £1,000 higher than anticipated – at almost £8,700. Such amounts may have little impact on those destined for elite City law firms and leading commercial barristers’ chambers, which pay trainees about £40,000 a year. But law students who pursue careers in areas such as legal aid, where entry-level earnings are among the lowest of any graduate job, look set to be weighed down by their university debts for years to come. How, then, can prospective lawyers keep the financial damage to a minimum, while at the same time gain CV-boosting experience to help them stand out in a graduate job market that’s more competitive than ever? Do a “vac scheme” – even if you have no intention of joining up full time Corporate law firms’ formal work experience programmes – which pay up to £300 a week – have traditionally been the preserve of City types. But the impressive breadth of some “vac schemes” make them worthwhile for students planning careers in other areas of law, where paid work experience is much harder to come by. Clifford Chance and Linklaters, for example, offers interns the opportunity to do pro bono – good experience for those who want to go into publicly funded legal practice. Herbert Smith and Hill Dickinson allows placement students to spend time in their specialist advocacy units, which employ in-house barristers – an excellent opportunity for bar wannabes who miss out on one of the few paid chambers work experience gigs (the handful of chambers offering funded mini-pupillages include One Gray’s Inn Square, 2 Temple Gardens, Pump Court Tax and 5 Stone Buildings). A word of warning, though: “Commercial firms want vac scheme students who are committed to their core business,” says Edward Walker, graduate recruitment manager at national law firm Pinsent Masons. “Those who aren’t may get found out during interview.” Don’t undervalue unglamorous part-time jobs Walker thinks a good strategy for law students is to find regular paid part-time work – however unglamorous – to help them survive, then weave what they have learned from it into their CVs in a thoughtful way. “A student working on the checkout at Sainsbury’s is more impressive than they often realise,” he says, adding that law firms have become slightly tired of CVs featuring “a long list of exciting-sounding, yet not especially substantial, jobs”. Walker continues: “Let’s not forget that companies like Sainsbury’s are law firms’ core clients. Understanding how their business works from the bottom up is very useful.” The experience of first-year Manchester University law student Joseph Tomlinson bears this out: “To my amazement, barristers’ chambers have been impressed by the fact I worked as a chef during my A-levels, because of the transferable skills it gave me. Despite this I have been repeatedly told by my careers service to leave this role off my CV because it has no relevance to law.” Find time for unpaid pro bono While law firms and barristers’ chambers value exposure to the commercial world, they are also keen on applicants with hands-on experience advising clients on legal matters. “Pro bono shows commitment to being a lawyer,” says Pinsent Masons’ Walker. But how do students fit in pro bono work – which often involves the time-consuming process of getting your head around new areas of law – when their evenings are spent at Sainsbury’s and their holidays full of work-experience placements? One way is to select a degree course where pro bono work is included as part of the curriculum. The law schools at the Universities of Kent (which won best law school at the annual LawWorks and Attorney General Student pro bono awards), Hull and Northumbria are all known for their “clinical” approach to legal education. Students at the former are encouraged to base their dissertations on issues arising from the real-life cases on which they have acted. “Pro bono works best when it’s not an add-on,” says Elaine Heslop, a lecturer and clinic solicitor at the University of Kent. Compete Like pro bono work, mooting (mock advocacy conducted in a courtroom setting) is time-consuming. “I won’t pretend that I haven’t lost a lot of sleep preparing bundles and skeleton arguments,” says Karamvir Chadha, who won the 2009 English Speaking Union-Essex Court Chambers national mooting competition. Unlike pro bono work, though, mooting can offer substantial financial rewards: for his triumph Chadha picked up a cash prize of £1,000; a similar sum is awarded to the winner of the other main national mooting event, the Oxford University Press & BPP national mooting competition. For those who prefer to make their arguments on paper – and are sufficiently motivated to spend their free time writing yet more essays – the rewards can be even greater. The annual Times and One Essex Court legal essay competition pays out £10,000 worth of prizes, out of which £3,500 goes to the writer of the winning piece. Take a gap year and hope a law firm will do a KPMG Earlier this year, accountants KPMG launched an initiative to sponsor students through undergraduate degrees while they work part-time for the firm, which will see it cover tuition fees, pay them a salary and give them a full-time job at the end of the course. Law firms have been looking on with interest. James Furber, senior partner at Farrer & Co, is in favour of his firm adopting a similar initiative “to keep a route into the profession open for students from less well off backgrounds”, as is Michael Shaw, head of national law firm Cobbetts. And College of Law chief executive Nigel Savage says he has “meetings lined up” with several magic circle (the five leading London-based) law firms about sponsoring students through its recently launched two-year accelerated undergraduate law degree. Those not keen on parting with £9,000 a year will hope that other firms follow KPMG’s lead. Alex Aldridge is a freelance journalist who writes about law and education Law University funding Tuition fees Alex Aldridge guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Standup’s growing popularity has seen it emerge from pubs and clubs to grander venues from the Nottingham Arena to the Albert Hall. Now the comedy must develop to fit them You know all those fringe theatre shows that reduce epic stories to pint-sized performances? I’m thinking of Ben Hur at BAC , or Spymonkey’s Moby Dick – the joke, or chutzpah, behind which is that the material is wildly out of proportion with the lo-fi staging. I was reminded of them when watching John Bishop perform standup at the Albert Hall . Around Bishop, an arena whose elegance, ornamentation and vast size were designed with the profound, the heart-soaring and the ineffable in mind. Onstage, a man cracking gags about trips to Ikea. This incongruity was in some ways the daftest joke of the evening. I’m not saying Bishop doesn’t belong in the Albert Hall – far from it. I’m all for demotic, democratic entertainment gatecrashing elitist buildings. But (at least until his song’n’dance finale) the quotidian nature of his shtick created an odd contrast with the venue. The act of talking to people from a stage about, say, the domestic habits of one’s wife was not originally undertaken with the Albert Hall in mind. The pub-chat school of standup was originally just that – a bloke with a microphone in a bar or working men’s club, talking to like-minded barflies. That style still prevails, and works fine on TV and in your average standup venue. But its smallness is exaggerated by arenas; the Albert Hall exposed the modesty of Bishop’s comedy in a way that even Edinburgh’s sizeable McEwan Hall (where I first saw the show) didn’t. The following night, I went to see Scott Capurro in the tiny Etcetera Theatre, a 41-seat room above a Camden pub. That was a disconcerting experience too – partly because Capurro deserves a bigger audience, and partly because a teensy studio theatre is an odd environment for a wilful provocateur to ply his trade. Capurro needs to be public, not private, to generate a frisson. A cabaret-style venue, where we can clock one another’s discomfort; a decent-sized theatre, whose audience can develop some kind of collective identity, and in which a collective gasp or bristle might really register – these are the spaces where his comedy would thrive. As standup booms, we’re going to see it in more and more shapes and sizes of venue, which is fine. But a show that works one way in Pleasance Two may work differently in the O2. In a tiny room, standup can feel confrontational, awkward or marginal. In an enormo-dome, it may feel low-horizoned or artistically unambitious. There are plenty of exceptions: Tim Minchin’s current orchestra show is one blazing example; Lee Evans’s energy could pin you to the back wall of the Nottingham Arena. Right now, standup is still amazed to find itself in the Albert Halls of this world – a point the incredulous Bishop repeatedly made onstage. But as comedy gets used to the promotion, here’s hoping we see more acts respond, in more ambitious ways, to the grand scale on which their work can now be performed. Comedy Brian Logan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …