Government may encourage applicants to seek banks’ help to pay for university places Students will be encouraged to borrow from high-street banks to cover their tuition fees, under proposals considered by the government as a way out of the funding crisis facing higher education. With more universities than expected charging the maximum of £9,000 a year for tuition, universities minister David Willetts is seeking a way to reduce the liabilities of the government-backed Student Loans Company by turning to the UK’s major banks to provide loans at preferable rates. Universities UK, which represents universities, has been consulted. Its president, Sir Steve Smith, who is vice-chancellor of Exeter University, said the proposal to allow banks to exploit the student market carried huge risks and could create a two-tier education system. He said the Department for Business Innovation and Skills had proposed that students taking private loans would be counted outside the allotment of places each university is given by the government, making them attractive to colleges aiming to increase their cash flow. Smith said the consequent risk of a two-tier higher education system had “nasty” implications. “They [the government] have talked to us about that, but the trouble is that it has the obvious objection that it looks awfully like those people buying their way in.” Smith, who said be had been in talks with several banks over the issue, added: “The trouble is that it is really difficult to come up with a system that doesn’t make it really difficult for people who attend less high-ranking institutions where the students don’t earn the money [to repay the loans].” The Observer understands that Willetts held talks with Spanish bank Santander last month over private student loans, an issue which threatens to embarrass the minister as he prepares to unveil his delayed white paper on the future of higher education. Last month Willetts was forced to defend himself from accusations that he was favouring the rich when he suggested that students who missed out on a place at the university of their choice after 2012 would still be able to attend the course if they paid up front. Banks are keen to recruit students as clients because they tend to stay loyal as they become more wealthy. A spokesman for Santander, Carlos Leira, said the bank was “very keen” on developing its discussions with the government. He said: “You are absolutely right that Santander has been in talks with David Willetts because we are very keen on developing sensible banking for students. “There is nothing set in stone yet, we are looking at different possibilities. We do have a loan at the moment for MBA students, but that is a tiny bit of what we want to do.” Smith said banks would only become involved if either the government or, more likely, the universities accepted liability for unpaid loans. He added: “Banks are interested only if the university takes the risk, the government takes the risk, or they do it only for a select few institutions. So you can imagine 10 institutions where the returns could be high, they could do a really good deal for our students.” The government has an estimated £1bn black hole in its finances following the decision by most universities to charge the maximum tuition fees. Shadow universities minister Gareth Thomas said the latest policy proposal was born out of desperation. “It’s now even clearer that the huge hole in the government’s higher education budget is driving policy on universities, as ministers look at ever more madcap plans to plug their funding gap,” he said. “I am all for more private finance in public services, but the banks deciding who gets a student loan or not is a recipe for a two-tier university system, helping a few lucky ones while leaving the majority to fend for themselves and quite clearly it hasn’t been thought through.” More controversial proposals will be aired next week. At present, universities are restricted to a quota of undergraduates in each intake and fined if they go beyond this. The government is expected to allow them to exceed quotas if they recruit the additional numbers from students who achieve grades AAB or higher at A-level in response to the outcry over high-attaining A-level pupils failing to get a place at their favoured university. University funding David Willetts Higher education Daniel Boffey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is winning rave reviews for getting gay marriage passed in New York. (“Enormous victory” for him, declares Politico .) And the New York Times has a lengthy piece detailing how he personally managed the push, including the wooing of deep-pocketed GOP donors who could provide…
Continue reading …Law Society and former DPP Lord Macdonald voice alarm at proposal undermining ‘cornerstone’ of British justice A “cornerstone” of the legal system, the universal right to a solicitor upon arrest, could be jettisoned in favour of means-testing under controversial plans drawn up by the Ministry of Justice. Legal experts including Lord Ken Macdonald QC, a former director of public prosecutions, have expressed alarm at the proposal and questioned how it would work in practice. Legal aid charities said the new measure, which was quietly slipped into the legal aid, sentencing and punishing of offenders bill, had taken them completely by surprise and predicted that it would be subject to fierce debate in parliament. The proposal would effectively set a bar that would see people who are earning above a certain amount of money or who have access to a particular level of savings forced to pay for legal representation. “There are issues of principle here,” said Richard Miller, head of legal aid policy at the Law Society. “When someone is arrested they are in the power of the state, subject to the mercies of the police officers involved. “The purpose of having a solicitor acting for them is to ensure their rights are respected, that they are not physically abused, that their confessions are not forged and they are not detained for longer than legally allowed. “It’s been a cornerstone of our justice system for the last 25 years and the idea that it should be changed is entirely wrong.” The universal right to representation by a solicitor at a police station was enshrined in the 1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act (Pace) in response to a series of serious miscarriages of justice in the 1970s and 80s involving unrepresented defendants. However, the government, which has already signalled its determination to cut some £350m from the legal aid budget, is keen to look for further savings. While a spokeswoman for the Ministry of Justice said it currently had “no plans” to introduce means-testing for legal representation upon arrest, she confirmed the new clause would give the government the power to introduce it if circumstances dictated. “The provision in the bill to permit means-testing ensures future flexibility over the operation of the legal aid system should it be needed,” the spokeswoman said. The confirmation drew a sharp response from Macdonald. “This is a critical part of the apparatus of protection that we have,” he said. “The presence of a lawyer doesn’t just protect the defendant from police, it protects the police from a defendant making up allegations about what happened, for instance during the course of an interrogation. I think the government should be very cautious about interfering in any way with the absolute right to representation in police stations. It’s there for a very good reason. When we didn’t have it ,we saw the consequences.” Legal bodies are concerned that the government plans to fast-track the legislation, which they claim will disadvantage the poor, through parliament. They complain that a second reading of the bill has been scheduled for Wednesday, which allows little time for adequate scrutiny of the details of the legislation. The justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, insists that urgent cuts are necessary because England and Wales have “the most expensive legal aid system in the world”. However, Sound off for Justice, a campaign run by the Law Society, claims the figures are misleading and has outlined alternative ways to save money. Macdonald questioned whether the government’s plans would save the taxpayer money in the long run. “Often it is more expensive to administer means-testing than operate it. Who’s going to ask you what your earnings are or how much your mortgage is? We are talking about having to ask these questions in stressful situations. The whole thing would be very unwieldy.” Legal aid Solicitors Police UK criminal justice Jamie Doward guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Moammar Gadhafi has reportedly lost top military officials to defection, and now he’ll have to do without his star soccer goalie. Juma Gtat and 17 other players from the national team have switched allegiance to the rebels, reports the BBC . “I am telling (Ghadafi) leave us alone and allow us…
Continue reading …One of New York’s highest-profile gay couples celebrated last night’s passage of the gay marriage bill in appropriate fashion: Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka got engaged. “I’ve already purposed (sic), he said yes! Thank god!” tweeted Burtka, before adding, “he proposed to me as well. I said yes! Thank…
Continue reading …Hundreds of Syrians, some with gunshot wounds, have crossed into neighboring Lebanon in search of a refuge from the growing violence in their homeland, a Lebanese security official said today. Most arriving at the border came after Syrian security forces opened fire on protesters demanding the ouster of President Bashar…
Continue reading …With a threat of still more rain looming, Minot was bracing today for the Souris River to cascade past its already unprecedented level and widen a path of destruction that had severely damaged thousands of homes and threatened many others. City officials were expecting the river to peak as early…
Continue reading …• Coalition split over new proposals on funding of social care • Review urges insurance policies to cover costs The middle classes should pay the first £35,000 of their old age care and be encouraged to take out insurance to cover that cost, according to a government-commissioned review into the future funding of social care to be published next week. The proposal will ignite the “death tax” row that led to a war of words between the Tories and the Labour government before the last election. The recommendations from economist Andrew Dilnot, which have been seen by the cabinet, are already causing a split within the coalition government, with one senior Liberal Democrat claiming chancellor George Osborne wants to “strangle the proposals at birth”. It is understood that the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, is in favour of the proposals but a source said that David Cameron and, in particular, Osborne appeared keen to “park the report in the long grass” because of the potential political pitfalls, and the financial commitments it would involve. There are growing fears that the prime minister will back his chancellor against the Liberal Democrats – including health minister Paul Burstow – who are broadly in favour of the proposals. Before the election last year there was a furious row about funding of care for the elderly after proposals about how much people should pay was agreed between the three parties before the Conservatives reneged, describing it as a Labour “death tax”. All parties agree that the black hole in funding for the elderly, which is expected to reach £6bn by 2020, needs a solution that will also take into account the growing numbers of older people. Currently, social care provided by councils is means tested. If someone needs residential care and has more than £23,250 in savings, capital or assets they have to pay for their care in full. Under the Dilnot proposals, there would be greater investment and, it is believed, a more generous means test would be brought in so that more people would be eligible for cover from the state. However, those with better than modest assets – the middle classes – would be required to cover costs. The amount they would need to pay would, however, be capped – which, it is believed, would encourage insurers to offer cover. But it is unclear how the problem of the middle classes moving their assets around so that they pass a means test would be resolved. Dilnot will say that there should be government investment of up to £3bn and that people should pay between £35,000 and £50,000 towards the costs of their care before the state steps in. But, crucially, the report will set out how conditions could be created in which a market for insurance would thrive, and the system would rely on the middle classes being encouraged to purchase cover for care costs. Under the current system, it is claimed, there are 800,000 older people who need care but do not receive it from the state, a figure that will increase to one
Continue reading …• Coalition split over new proposals on funding of social care • Review urges insurance policies to cover costs The middle classes should pay the first £35,000 of their old age care and be encouraged to take out insurance to cover that cost, according to a government-commissioned review into the future funding of social care to be published next week. The proposal will ignite the “death tax” row that led to a war of words between the Tories and the Labour government before the last election. The recommendations from economist Andrew Dilnot, which have been seen by the cabinet, are already causing a split within the coalition government, with one senior Liberal Democrat claiming chancellor George Osborne wants to “strangle the proposals at birth”. It is understood that the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, is in favour of the proposals but a source said that David Cameron and, in particular, Osborne appeared keen to “park the report in the long grass” because of the potential political pitfalls, and the financial commitments it would involve. There are growing fears that the prime minister will back his chancellor against the Liberal Democrats – including health minister Paul Burstow – who are broadly in favour of the proposals. Before the election last year there was a furious row about funding of care for the elderly after proposals about how much people should pay was agreed between the three parties before the Conservatives reneged, describing it as a Labour “death tax”. All parties agree that the black hole in funding for the elderly, which is expected to reach £6bn by 2020, needs a solution that will also take into account the growing numbers of older people. Currently, social care provided by councils is means tested. If someone needs residential care and has more than £23,250 in savings, capital or assets they have to pay for their care in full. Under the Dilnot proposals, there would be greater investment and, it is believed, a more generous means test would be brought in so that more people would be eligible for cover from the state. However, those with better than modest assets – the middle classes – would be required to cover costs. The amount they would need to pay would, however, be capped – which, it is believed, would encourage insurers to offer cover. But it is unclear how the problem of the middle classes moving their assets around so that they pass a means test would be resolved. Dilnot will say that there should be government investment of up to £3bn and that people should pay between £35,000 and £50,000 towards the costs of their care before the state steps in. But, crucially, the report will set out how conditions could be created in which a market for insurance would thrive, and the system would rely on the middle classes being encouraged to purchase cover for care costs. Under the current system, it is claimed, there are 800,000 older people who need care but do not receive it from the state, a figure that will increase to one
Continue reading …LeBron James has been called one of basketball’s greatest since his high school days, and we’d probably have no problem believing it—if he didn’t open his mouth so much. In fact, his ugly reaction to Miami Heat’s homecourt loss in the 2011 finals is just the tip of his…
Continue reading …