New York Democratic congressman to seek professional help after sending sexually suggestive images to women online Embattled Democrat Anthony Weiner announced he has requested a leave of absence from Congress following growing pressure from senior party members to resign after admitting he sent sexually suggestive images of himself to several women. A spokeswoman for the 46-year-old New York congressman made the disclosure in a statement shortly after Democratic leaders demanded Weiner quit, adding that he would be receiving “professional treatment” at an undisclosed location. The House Democrat leader, Nancy Pelosi, said Weiner had “the love of his family, the confidence of his constituents and the recognition that he needs help”. Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, described the incident as a sordid affair that had become “an unacceptable distraction”. Weiner’s spokeswoman, Risa Heller, revealed that the congressman had departed “to seek professional treatment to focus on becoming a better husband and healthier person”. She added: “In light of that, he will request a short leave of absence from the House of Representatives so that he can get evaluated and map out a course of treatment to make himself well.” The development came just 24 hours after Weiner first acknowledged he had exchanged online messages with a 17-year-old girl in the state of Delaware, although he insisted nothing improper had passed between them. He also finally admitted sending a picture of himself in his underpants via Twitter to another woman. Democrats said the concerted call for Weiner’s resignation had been brewing for days, as senior party officials concluded the scandal was interfering with their attempts to gain political momentum in advance of the 2012 elections. Democrats hope to rebound from a devastating election last November in which the Republicans won control of the House. “We had decided we were not going to have one more week of Anthony Weinergate,” said one official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The official added that Pelosi had spoken numerous times with Weiner in an attempt to persuade him to step down for the good of the party, telling him that because of the media focus on his predicament their attacks on a Republican Medicare proposal were going unnoticed. The Republicans have proposed major cuts in the government-run Medicare programme which provides healthcare to the elderly. Pelosi, Wasserman Schultz and others had been notably reticent in public in the days since Weiner held a news conference to announce he had exchanged lewd photos, and more, with a handful of women. On Thursday, an X-rated photo surfaced on a website, and in response, Weiner’s office issued a statement that did not deny it had been taken of him. Weiner is married to Huma Abedin, a top aide to Hillary Clinton. She is pregnant with the couple’s first child and is travelling with Clinton in Africa. Anthony Weiner New York United States James Orr guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …At least 34 people have been killed and another 100 injured after two explosions ripped through a busy market area Two explosions ripped through a busy market in Pakistan’s volatile northwestern city of Peshawar, killing at least 34 people and injuring nearly
Continue reading …enlarge Sarah Palin has issued yet another ghost-written Facebook page note-cum-press release, predictably bashing Obama for his inability to live up to the great St. Ronnie Reagan, entitled with the statesman-like “Another ‘WTF’ Obama Foreign Policy Moment” . President Obama wants to give Russia our missile defense secrets because he believes that we can buy their friendship and cooperation with this taxpayer-funded gift. But giving military secrets and technologies to a rival or competitor like Russia is just plain dumb. You can’t buy off Russia. And giving them advanced military technology will not create stability. What happens if Russia gives this technology (or sells it!) to other countries like Iran or China? After all, as Woolsey points out, Russia helped Iran with its missile and nuclear programs. Or what happens if an even more hardline leader comes to power in the Kremlin? We tried buying off the Kremlin with technologies in the 1970s. That policy was a component of “detente,” and the hope was that if we would share our technologies with them, they would become more peaceful. Things, of course, didn’t work out that way. The Kremlin took western technologies and embarked on a massive military building program. History teaches that peace comes from American military strength. And a central component of that has always been technological superiority. Why would President Obama even dream of giving this away? I’ve said before that I’m not convinced that Sarah Palin knows where or how a sentence she is speaking will end until she gets there. It appears that same trait is true of her writing too. Of course, it’s hard to craft sensible arguments when one doesn’t know what the hell one is talking about . From her recounting of history, Palin appears to be arguing that the United States and the West gave “technologies” during this period, and that “the Kremlin took Western technologies and embarked on a massive military building program.” Palin’s language struck us a garbled version of this period written by her new foreign policy adviser, Peter Schweizer of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. [..] In fact, technology imports from the United States were heavily restricted during this period. “All sorts of restrictions remained in force on what technical equipment could be provided to [East Bloc] countries, and while I’m sure Nixon/Kissinger/Ford might have eased a few requirements here or there, it was hardly an effort to ‘buy off’ the Kremlin by ‘sharing’ militarily useful technologies,” said James Hershberg, associate professor of history and international affairs at George Washington University and former director of the Cold War International History Project. “The Jackson-Vanik Amendment [of 1974] imposed further limitations on economic relations even at the height of detente.” The restrictions on technology trade were so tough that the Soviets embarked on a massive spying operation designed to obtain such goods. “It definitely was not as a result of some sort of conscious effort by Washington to ‘buy’ Soviet sympathy or cooperation,” Hershberg said. In fact, when the French government provided the United States with information on what items the Soviets were trying to obtain, the CIA plotted to sabotage the Soviet economy through covert transfers of technology that contained hidden malfunctions. One devious bit of software sold by the CIA later triggered a huge explosion in a Siberian natural gas pipeline that could be seen from space. Now this is a slightly more nuanced error than not grasping the historical importance of Paul Revere and I doubt very much that most Americans would be able to articulate the details of our Cold War strategizing. But if you’re going to criticize the President for not understanding the historical challenges of our relationship with Russia and making the same choices as Reagan, you really ought to have your own facts straight.
Continue reading …Terrorist was behind the 1998 attacks on two embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed hundreds of people The terrorist behind the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa – the attack that brought al-Qaida to global attention – has been killed in Somalia. Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, who had a $5m price tag put on his head by American authorities, was one of the most wanted Islamist militants in the world. The embassy attacks – in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania – killed more than 200 people and injured several thousand. The majority of the casualties were local African staff or passersby caught in the multiple explosions that destroyed the buildings. Mohammed also organised the 2002 attacks on two Israeli targets, including the bombing of an Israeli-owned hotel in Kenya, which killed 13 people, and an attempt to shoot down a passenger plane on a flight to Israel. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, who was on a visit to Tanzania as news of the death broke, described the killing as a “significant blow to al-Qaida, its extremist allies, and its operations in east Africa”. “It is a just end for a terrorist who brought so much death and pain to so many innocents in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam and elsewhere – Tanzanians, Kenyans, Somalis and our own embassy personnel,” she said. A senior American official in Washington said that his killing removed one of the group’s “most experienced operational planners in east Africa and has almost certainly set back operations”. News of Mohammed’s death comes just six weeks after the death of the al-Qaida leader, Osama bin Laden, in a US special forces raid in Pakistan. Last week Ilyas Kashmiri, another senior terrorist with ties to al-Qaida, was also reported to have been killed. Kenyan police, who cited Somali officials, said Mohammed had been shot dead when he and an associate refused to stop at a checkpoint north-west of Mogadishu, the Somali capital, earlier this week. The dead man, thought to be aged 38, had a false passport and $40,000 in cash it was reported. “We have confirmed he was killed by
Continue reading …Like Nickelodeon’s Doug Funny, Hillary Clinton prefers one uniform to wear while on the job: the famous pantsuit. And the Secretary of State is in good company; German Chancellor Angela Merkel is also a devoted pantsuit fan. (LIST: Women in Fashion) Before Tuesday’s state dinner, reports Yahoo, the ladies bonded over their mutual fashion sense.
Continue reading …Sam Mayfield is a Madison journalist who’s been covering the labor protests in the Wisconsin capital. She was arrested this week and handled roughly by a cop who seems to have singled out journalists. Here’s her account: On June 6th two journalists were arrested at the state capital in Madison, WI. I was one of them. I was grabbed by an aggressive and very escalated police officer after walking in to the state capital on June 6th. Officer Corcoran told me to leave, to “get out”. It was bewildering because I was already in the building and was simply walking by him filming my way into the rotunda. He grabbed me aggressively. I told him, in the friendliest voice I could find, that I was with the press. He let me walk by. I recognized him from the many times I have been in the building over the past four months covering the gentle uprising as it develops and unfolds around Governor Scott Walker’s controversial budget repair bill. Alex Noguera-Garces was assisting me this day, she was also stopped. I told Corcoran that she was with me and was a member of the press. Initially he let her through. When she stayed behind to film his treatment of citizens as they entered the building, he grabbed and arrested her. She was hauled away in handcuffs. It came to my attention that she was being taken away. I went to her aid and when I explained that “I was a member of the press” Corcoran let me know that “I could go, too”. Referring to jail and being arrested like Alex. Alex was in taken to an elevator. While inside, before the doors closed, she handed me her camera that was dangling in her hand, likely to fall given the situation. I accepted the camera. At that time Corcoran dropped Alex to the ground, lunged at me from the elevator and tackled me. The excessive force he used left bruises on my arms and hips. Corcoran never gave me a straight answer as to why he grabbed me or why I was being arrested. He changed his story three times between the time I was in the elevator with him and while he processed my and Alex’s charges in the basement. While in the basement I was pushed around by another office. Literally. I was standing talking on my cell phone, calling for support and an officer came into the hallway, pushed me from behind, shoving me against a table and told me to “calm down”. Is this the new way that reporters and citizens can expect to be treated in the Wisconsin State Capital? The environment was hostile. The exertion of arbitrary authority was overwhelming. Cops pushing citizens and journalists around because they think they can get away with it. We must let them know that journalists and citizens alike will not be pushed around, we will not tolerate the use of excessive force simply because someone is wearing a badge. We do not have to leave a public building simply because a man or a woman with a gun and badge tells us to do so. We are critical thinking individuals; we have the right, the ability and the obligation to challenge authority. Eventually we were both charged with disorderly conduct, given a $263.50 fine and a court date slated for June 17th. .
Continue reading …Labour alleges failure to act against pornographic websites where material can easily be viewed by children Ministers have been accused of failing to crack down on pornographic websites that can easily be viewed by children. The claim came just days after the children’s minister, Sarah Teather, unveiled the Bailey review into the sexualisation of children, which recommended that age ratings be introduced for raunchy pop videos and “vanity covers” be compulsory for so-called lads’ mags such as Nuts and Zoo . It emerged this weekend that the government has not acted on a separate recommendation from the media regulator, Ofcom, which said last year that the law should be changed so that sexually explicit content on video-on-demand websites could not be seen by children. The government asked Ofcom last year to examine whether the law should be changed to protect children from pornographic material that was easily available on some adult sites, including Playboy.tv, which allowed paying members to download a wide range of pornographic material. Many of them also offer sexually explicit “try before you buy” content that can be easily viewed without a credit card or account number. Ofcom recommended in a report passed to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) nine months ago that the government should pass legislation forcing those sites to protect their free trial content with a pin number. But the coalition has not published Ofcom’s report or acted on its recommendations. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, said: “David Cameron’s commitment to act on Bailey’s recommendations rings hollow now we know his government has suppressed this important report. It is either incompetence or a deliberate attempt to keep the public and parliament in the dark. Ofcom’s report should be published without delay so we can consider its findings and take the necessary action.” The DCMS said the report was still being considered by ministers. It said: “The government is committed to protecting children from accessing harmful material and DCMS has requested advice from Ofcom and others regarding regulation of video-on-demand services. There is a range of views on whether new measures are required and we are currently considering options.” Whitehall sources speculated that last year’s Ofcom’s recommendation, which the regulator said could be implemented through secondary legislation, might be a casualty of the government’s war on red tape.It has made a commitment to introduce new regulations only when another is scrapped to make way for it, a “one in, one out” policy that made it difficult to implement some new proposals. A wide-ranging EU directive on media services, enshrined in UK law two years ago, introduced new rules on the regulation of “TV-like content” online. The Audiovisual Media Services Directive was controversial because internet companies including YouTube, which is owned by Google, believed it could make them subject to the same regulations that govern terrestrial TV channels such as ITV and Channel 4. That was ruled out by the EU, but the directive does include a requirement for member states to protect minors from adult content available on video-on-demand services by forcing them to introduce access codes. The proposals would only affect a handful of websites that are monitored by Atvod, which regulates editorial content on video-on-demand services. The Bailey review was written by Reg Bailey, the chief executive of the Christian charity the Mothers’ Union. David Cameron is backing its key recommendations, which also include the creation of a new website where parents can complain about broadcasters or advertisers who use sexually explicit content. Cameron raised the issue when he was in opposition, but the government needs to balance a desire to address parents’ concerns against the need to ensure the music, entertainment and advertising businesses continue to grow.Taken together the creative industries, which also include fashion, design and video games, continue to expand despite the challenging economic environment. Ofcom Internet Pornography Children Liberal-Conservative coalition Labour James Robinson Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Health spokesman fears deal could collapse over ‘Trojan horse’ for companies to run NHS services A senior Liberal Democrat MP has warned Nick Clegg that a compromise deal within the coalition over NHS reforms could be blown apart by a report due this week from a body set up to advise the government on changes to the health bill. John Pugh, the party’s spokesman on health, voiced his concerns over the NHS Future Forum, a group of experts set up to report to the government on what changes should be made. The government is set to accept wholesale the body’s recommendations on future competition within the NHS following the “pause” to the controversial bill’s progress in parliament. But Pugh told the Observer he believed there was considerable doubt over whether Sir Stephen Bubb, the expert responsible for the body’s conclusions on competition, was sufficiently neutral over the issue. Bubb leads the Adventure Capital Fund, which provides finance for “third-sector” organisations for a return on its investments. Its highest-paid director receives £140,000 a year, according to Companies House, and its clients would stand to benefit from further competition between health care providers. It is understood that Pugh’s concerns over Bubb’s views are shared by others who have been heavily involved in the government’s listening exercise. Pugh, co-chairman of the Liberal Democrats’ parliamentary committee on health, said: “Despite a growing consensus across the NHS and political spectrum about the appropriate balance to be achieved between collaboration and competition, it could all collapse if an attempt is made to skew the feedback from the listening exercise. In particular, the role of Bubb in chairing the listening exercise on competition is seen by many as a clear conflict of interest. “Asking Sir Stephen to sum up on competition rules is as neutral as asking Simon Cowell to tell us about the merits of TV talent shows. “The real problem, though, is Sir Stephen’s enthusiasm for better access to NHS work for the charitable sector, which will be a Trojan horse that will allow huge private companies to dismember the NHS in a chaotic fashion.” Bubb has already shown the direction of his recommendations in a blog promising “radical proposals”. Two weeks ago he wrote: “I went to a good meeting today with the NHS Confed Partners Network, an umbrella body for all the independent providers in the health service. For political reasons, the private sector were excluded from the Future Forum, so in my area I feel it’s only right to ensure I hear their views. And very balanced and sensible they are. I still hold to the view that what matters is what is delivered, not who delivers it.” Last night Bubb, who is chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, denied that there was any conflict of interest. He said: “The Adventure Capital Fund, which I chair, is a charity set up to make loans to charities and community organisations. I am immensely proud of the work it has done developing community enterprise in deprived communities.” Pugh’s intervention comes as Clegg prepares to persuade colleagues that he has achieved the changes his party demanded at its spring conference. A source close to the deputy prime minister said he would talk through the government’s response to the NHS Future Forum’s report tomorrow. “Nick will now be able to present his colleagues with the scorecard and tick off each of their 13 objectives. They’ll be there for all to see,” the source added. “We’re expecting the parliamentary party to be pretty pleased with the result. We have won.” A main concern over the health bill is the potential privatisation of the NHS. However, the Patients Association has warned that the reforms could also wreck the bond of trust between GPs and the sick by making family doctors deny some people treatment for financial reasons. They claim that handing England’s GPs control of £60bn of NHS funds could lead to tension between their new financial responsibilities and providing the best care. The warning comes in the influential group’s submission to the government’s “listening exercise”, seen by the Observer . It says: “No matter what measures of accountability are put in place, patients fear that GPs will face a huge conflict of interest by having to balance their books rather than buying in the best services for patients.” Dr Clare Gerada, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs, warned that GPs could be tempted to underspend budgets in order to increase their salaries. The association has put together a strong critique of the government’s plans which is based on the views of more than 1,000 patients and people attending six “listening” events it organised. The submission contains a warning that allowing “any willing provider” to provide NHS services will lead to private firms “cherry-picking the most profitable services. It is feared this policy will result in privatisation of the NHS, depletion of resources from the NHS and instability”. A Department of Health spokesman said: “We need to modernise the NHS now to secure it for future generations. Our plans put power into the hands of doctors and nurses so they can provide the tailored care that patients want, to world-class standards.” Health policy Nick Clegg NHS Liberal Democrats Public services policy Daniel Boffey Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Survivors claim government forces shot escaping residents, ambulance men and soldiers who laid down their arms Hikmat was one of the few remaining residents in Jisr al-Shughour when the Syrian army rolled in, firing wildly and at will. “They didn’t care what they were shooting at,” said the 39-year-old, who was hit in the foot as soldiers finally delivered on a week-long threat to wreak havoc in the town that dared rage against the regime. Jisr al-Shughour has now been sealed off by some 15,000 troops – backed by tanks and helicopters – who are operating with impunity. Hours after being wounded, Hikmat fled for the Turkish border. “There was a good man with a motorcycle who gave me a ride,” he said. “We had to travel at night because the roads were still not safe.” He said he passed “many, many” people from the town of more than 40,000 who had fled to the rolling hills between Jisr al-Shughour and the safety of the Turkish border. “They are too scared to move. They are terrified.” Those who have crossed the frontier are shedding increasing light on three days of bloodshed that have changed the face of the Syrian revolt. Until now there have been few voices able to speak out about what was left behind in Jisr al-Shughour or the events leading up to last weekend’s carnage. The Syrian information ministry said that the bloodbath had been caused by armed gangs, which attacked the military and killed 120. Interviews conducted in recent days, however, have painted a very different picture. They tell of a crackdown far more brutal than any other seen since the first uprising three months ago, although protests have been met with ever-increasing force by President Bashar al-Assad. Last Sunday, Samir, 27, had just returned from a funeral for a local man, Bassil Musri, who was killed the day before by security forces. “We were gathered in a large garden at the centre of town,” he said. “I was the first one shot. They had taken positions in every government building surrounding us.” Samir’s body was riddled with bullets, which have taken a terrible toll. He is bleeding internally and is racked with infection. He may not survive the coming days. “The gunfire was from everywhere,” he said, lying in a hospital bed in Antakya in Turkey. “So many people fell. It was a massacre.” Samir said trouble had been brewing for days. Strangers in town had been gathering information on demonstrators – especially those the regime had flagged as agents provocateurs. “We had been campaigning for freedom, for our rights, just like everyone else. They say we had weapons. Believe me, if we had I would have been the first to use one.” In the same hospital, Abu Tahar, 29, an ambulance driver from Jisr al-Shughour, was being treated for gunshot wounds to his back. He had arrived at the garden last Sunday to help the wounded. “Bullets were raining from everywhere,” he said. “It was chaos.” He said that up to 10,000 people had gathered in the garden, one of the few large public places in town, to protest at the killing of Musri. “They just kept shooting and shooting,” he said. “Earlier in the week we had been told not to go to pick up the wounded. They wanted them to die there. Anyone who tried was shot, his body falling on top of the other victim. That is what happened to me. The next thing I knew I woke up here.” He said he had spoken by telephone to family members in the town who confirmed that in the hours after the shooting in the garden large numbers of security forces had abandoned their posts – and had been shot at by soldiers loyal to the regime. He said some 14 soldiers had returned to their homes earlier in the week after refusing to carry out orders, a rarity in Syria, which had led officials to send in spies to monitor citizens and extra forces to deal harshly with any further dissent. Samir said he had been among a group that had captured two men who had been acting as government informants. “One of them had a beard – and none of the Syrian army has beards. He didn’t speak a word of Arabic.” Samir’s account matches those of six other Jisr al-Shughour citizens who last week all spoke of foreigners – perhaps Iranians – who were standing alongside Syrian soldiers during the clashes. Britain has accused Iran of sending members of its Revolutionary Guards corps to help Damascus monitor the protests, but until last week said it had not seen evidence of troops on the ground. The presence of Iranian troops would raise the stakes in a revolution that is steadily drawing in neighbouring states. Turkey said it is now dealing with 4,300 refugees and expecting many more. Lebanon, too, is facing an influx of people fleeing eastern Syria. Israel is also bracing for more attempts to infiltrate the Golan Heights, which it seized in 1967. Israel and the US insist that Damascus is trying to create a series of deadly diversions along the Golan in a bid to divert attention from its own woes. Abu Tahar said the violence a week ago rekindled family memories that his father had long ago buried – two massacres ordered by Bashar al-Assad’s father, Hafez, in the early 1980s, one of which also targeted Jisr al-Shughour. “My father always said forget about it, never speak about this.” Abu Tahar added: “He said we could not get involved in politics because it would kill us all. We know the nature of our regime. Every day for the past month I knew they were coming for us. They have done what we feared they would do. The difference is that the world now knows. They will kill us all if they can. There are many people still in the mountains too scared to move. This is a crisis and they need help.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Bashar Al-Assad Martin Chulov Rachel Stevenson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Energy secretary urges consumers to hurt suppliers over increases with more companies likely to announce cost hikes The government has intervened dramatically in the row over spiralling energy prices by urging consumers to desert companies, such as Scottish Power, that impose substantial increases in the cost of gas and electricity. As concern grows that the other five major energy companies are preparing to follow Scottish Power and announce big rises within weeks, the energy secretary, Chris Huhne, told the Observer that consumers should not accept the increases “lying down” but “hurt” their supplier by finding cheaper alternatives. “Consumers don’t have to take price increases lying down,” he said. “If an energy company hits you with a price increase, you can hit them back where it hurts – by shopping around and voting with your feet.” Last week Scottish Power raised gas prices by 19% and electricity tariffs by 10%, adding 48p a day, or £175 a year, to the average daily combined gas and electricity bill of its 2.4 million customers. Now millions more consumers are expected to be hit by imminent rises as the other big suppliers follow suit. At least one of the other so-called “big six” energy companies is understood to be preparing to announce a significant price increase in the coming days, and the rest are likely to follow over the next few weeks.”There has been a lot of waiting for somebody to go first. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if we didn’t see the other five big energy companies putting up their prices pretty quickly. And I couldn’t rule out us doing it soon,” said a source at one of the big six. Huhne’s intervention is the latest sign of concern in the coalition about the impact of rising prices on consumers as they face what Bank of England governor Sir Mervyn King has called the most prolonged decline in living standards since the 1920s. Ministers are also understood to be seeking powers to force companies to reveal to every customer on their bills whether they are on the cheapest tariff, amid concerns about lack of transparency. In a further attempt to ease pressure on prices by increasing competition, the energy secretary will this week announce new measures to make it easier for smaller companies to compete in the market by easing the costs and red tape that prevent them from doing so. Around 99% of people currently get their energy from one of the big six. “Right now, only one in five people switch suppliers. I want to see more switching, more competition and more companies in the market,” Huhne said. “The big six only have a few minnows snapping at them, who are kept artificially small. By scrapping red tape for small players they can become serious challengers and help keep bills down.” The move comes as chancellor George Osborne prepares to defend his handling of the economy in his annual Mansion House speech on Wednesday. Official figures to be published on Tuesday are expected to show that inflation remains above 4%, more than double the government’s target, and adding to pressure for a rise in interest rates. Rocketing utilities bills will pile on the pain for households already struggling under the weight of public spending cuts and tax increases, including January’s VAT rise. Analysts are now warning that if the other energy suppliers follow Scottish Power, it could cause a fresh spike in inflation later this year. “Since prices usually jump in August anyway, following the end of the summer sales in July, we could be facing a sharp jump in the inflation rate in late summer which will take it well above 5%,” said Peter Dixon, chief UK economist at Commerzbank. A string of retailers have reported that sales on the high street are flagging as consumers tighten their belts. Research by insurance group Axa suggested last week that up to 20 million people have cut back on spending this year. A spokesman for Consumer Focus added: “The big six tend to hunt in a pack. When one goes, they all go. Consumers need to brace for across-the-board increases. On past experience the energy providers tend to introduce very similar price increases. We are concerned about competition in this market.” Scottish Power blamed last week’s price rises on soaring wholesale gas and oil prices, which have risen by nearly a third this year on the back of Middle East unrest, the weak dollar and continuing demand from emerging countries. Further measures to address a lack of competition in the market are expected to be announced by energy regulator Ofgem. The changes, which could be announced as soon as this week, are expected to force the big six – which have their own power stations – to auction up to a fifth of their generated output on the open market to make it easier for new players to enter the market. The new measures are also expected to ensure that the huge array of tariffs – which has grown by 70% since 2008 to nearly 350 – are dramatically reduced so that customers can more easily compare prices between suppliers. Ofgem first announced these proposals in March, following a four-month investigation. The regulator gave the big six – Scottish Power, nPower, EDF, Scottish and Southern, E.ON and British Gas – until 1 June to “engage constructively” with its proposals or face a referral to the Competition Commission. Energy industry Energy bills Consumer affairs Household bills Chris Huhne Energy Gas Toby Helm Tom Bawden Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …