Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 916)
As Pelosi And Other Dems Call For His Resignation, Anthony Weiner Takes "Leave of Absence" For Rehab

enlarge TPM has the story : “Congressman Weiner departed this morning to seek professional treatment to focus on becoming a better husband and healthier person,” the statement reads. “In light of that, he will request a short leave of absence from the House of Representatives so that he can get evaluated and map out a course of treatment to make himself well. Congressman Weiner takes the views of his colleagues very seriously and has determined that he needs this time to get healthy and make the best decision possible for himself, his family and his constituents.” Weiner’s abrupt departure comes on the heels of the news that Weiner had had private messages with a 17 year old high school student, although both Weiner and the minor’s parents insist that no inappropriate messages were exchanged. Weiner did not absolutely rule out the notion of treatment at his press conference Monday, but made a point of saying that this was not a subject for which he felt could be eliminated by treatment but rather was an error in judgment. Unfortunately, Weiner leaves as pressure for him to resign ratchets up. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and DCCC Chair Steve Israel have all called for Weiner to resign, despite the fact that polls show his constituents do not want him to and there’s a great likelihood his seat will be districted out next year. The House Democratic leadership went public today with their unequivocal desire for Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) to resign his office as a result of a scandal involving sexual conversations and explicit photos sent over the Internet. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), DNC Chair and Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and DCCC Chair and fellow New York Congressman Steve Israel simultaneously released statements calling on Weiner to resign.Pelosi’s statement: “Congressman Weiner has the love of his family, the confidence of his constituents, and the recognition that he needs help. I urge Congressman Weiner to seek that help without the pressures of being a Member of Congress.” Wasserman Schultz: “It is with great disappointment that I call on Representative Anthony Weiner to resign. The behavior he has exhibited is indefensible and Representative Weiner’s continued service in Congress is untenable. This sordid affair has become an unacceptable distraction for Representative Weiner, his family, his constituents and the House – and for the good of all, he should step aside and address those things that should be most important – his and his family’s well-being.” And Israel: “Anthony’s inappropriate behavior has become an insurmountable distraction to the House and our work for the American people. With a heavy heart, I call on Anthony to resign. “I pray for his family and hope that Anthony will take time to get the help he needs without the distractions and added pressures of Washington, DC.” Notably, James Clyburn broke from the Democratic leadership (such as it can be called in this instance) and supported Weiner. Personally, I think this whole event is indicative of the weak leadership we have in Congress. Without defending Weiner (and with the caveat that if anything inappropriate was exchanged with the minor, all bets are off), the Democrats caving to Republican politicking and haymaking shows why it’s such a struggle to move that Overton Window to the left. As long as Weiner’s communications with the minor remain appropriate–and all indications so far is that they will–then Weiner’s committed no infraction to require this abandonment from his own party. Did the Republicans do that for Vitter? Ensign? Coburn? Hell, have they done it for Boehner and his lobbyist girlfriend who is not his wife? No, no, no, and hell no. But the Democrats are only too willing to give up on someone who was openly targeted by conservative smear merchants, who has broken no laws and who still enjoys the support of the majority of his constituents. Party of the people? Not so much. Hey, how ’bout we pay as much attention to the clear ethics violations of Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife as we do to Anthony Weiner?

Continue reading …
Five Discoveries from the Sarah Palin E-Mail Dump

On Friday afternoon, 24,199 printed pages of Sarah Palin’s e-mails were released. Reporters went crazy. Here’s what they found out so far. 1. Palin had her eye on the VP spot for months. In the summer of 2008, the Associated Press reports, Palin and her staff had been trying to get the governor more name

Continue reading …
Pelosi: Secure Communities Program A ‘Waste of Taxpayer Money’

enlarge Yesterday Nancy Pelosi called the Secure Communities program a “waste of taxpayer money.” Democratic officials from several other states with large immigrant populations are also speaking out against the program, which is widely acknowledged as missing the mark and is responsible for deporting many harmless people: The Obama Administration claims that “Secure Communities” (or S-Comm, as it is widely known) is intended to catch and deport hardened criminals, but it has drastically missed the mark. Instead, the government’s own data shows that 62% of those deported were never convicted of a crime or were involved in low-level offenses, like traffic violations. And in light of recent polling, it would be wise for the Administration to rethink wanting to implement this [flawed] program nationwide, especially as it doesn’t work right now. Just yesterday, Latino Decisions and ImpreMedia released polling which found that immigration is the top issue driving the Latino vote . According to the poll, many Latinos have a personal connection to the immigration debate: 53% of poll respondents reported personally knowing an undocumented person, whether a relative, friend, or co-worker. Additionally, 25% of respondents reported personally knowing someone who “faced detention or deportation for immigration reasons.” If I didn’t know better, I’d swear that President Obama is courting the Republican vote. Thus, both parties have work to do if they want to court the Latino vote. According to the poll: 65% – 19% margin, Latino voters trust President Obama and Democrats more “to make the right decisions when it comes to immigration policy” compared with Republicans. Yet the news wasn’t all good for Democrats, as 43% of respondents said Democrats in the U.S. Congress were “ignoring or avoiding” immigration reform vs. only 33% who said they were “working on passing” immigration reform.

Continue reading …
Return of the Rainbow Warrior

The 1985 bombing of the Rainbow Warrior made the converted fishing trawler a campaigning icon. Now, in its 40th anniversary year, Greenpeace is launching its first purpose-built protest ship – one of the most technologically advanced vessels to set sail The secretive shipyards of Bremen in northern Germany are the places where Russian oligarchs and Silicon Valley billionaires go to have their fantasies (and insecurities) made into yachts. In a hangar at the yard of Fassmer on the banks of the River Weser, however, a different kind of £16m dream boat is taking shape. It is a dream that began more than 25 years ago, when Greenpeace’s Rainbow Warrior was sunk in Auckland Harbour by bombs planted by the French secret service. The determination then, from environmental activists across the globe, was that “you can’t sink a Rainbow”. In the years since, Greenpeace has become perhaps the world’s most recognisable and sophisticated global eco-charity. Its ships, however – converted trawlers and gas guzzlers – have never quite lived up to its green aspirations. That is where the dream comes in. The new Rainbow Warrior III, which I had come to Bremen to get a first look at, will be among the most environmentally advanced ships of its size at sea. The boat – “don’t call it a yacht!” I’m told – is nearly 60m long and currently cased in scaffolding, though the distinctive dove of peace and childlike red-and-yellow- and-pink-and-green rainbow is visible on its hull. At the beginning of next month, when the ship is baptised, twin 50-metre masts will be hoisted on its deck to carry 1,200 sq m of sail. A state-of-the-art hybrid engine will be needed for only about 10% of its operational power. Everything about it, from the paintwork to the insulation, has been designed with sustainability in mind. Each component comes with transparent ethical sourcing. Below deck the ship will house one of the most sophisticated communications operations anywhere on the ocean. As well as all this up-to-the-minute kit, the boat is required to have something that is not mentioned in the hundreds of pages of specification: a soul. This particular tricky fixture is very much rooted in its history. On one level Rainbow Warrior III is the inspired result of some of the latest thinking in sailboat technology from world-leading – mainly Dutch – computer modellers and wind-tunnel obsessives. On another it is the latest fulfilment of an old Native American prophecy: “There will come a time when the earth grows sick, and when it does a tribe will gather from all the cultures of the world who believe in deeds and not words. They will work to heal it… they will be known as the ‘Warriors of the Rainbow’.” There are various sources for that prophecy, which spread among early environmentalists when it was published in a book of Hopi Indian and Cree legends in California in 1962. But 15 years later, when Greenpeace activists in the UK came up with the idea of taking a ship to bear witness to some of the more blatant acts of ecological destruction – from whaling and oil exploration to nuclear testing and industrial fishing – that were occurring in the remote oceans, there was only one name that could do it justice. The Aberdeen-built trawler the Sir William Hardy” was almost ready for scrap when it was bought by Greenpeace for £40,000. After a refit and hand-painting of the famous logo on its bow, it first sailed out along the Thames on 15 May 1978. The first Rainbow Warrior had been making headlines (and trouble for corporations and governments) successfully for seven years when, on a mission to disrupt French nuclear testing in the South Pacific, it was infamously sunk in Auckland harbour by two bombs attached to its hull by French secret agents. One Greenpeace crew member, the photographer Fernando Pereira, was killed, having gone below deck after the first explosion to try to retrieve his cameras. The story quickly became a defining legend, not just of Greenpeace but of environmental activism in general. This history seemed very present as I walked around the half-finished decks of the new boat, where German engineers were efficiently welding together the latest incarnation of the mythology. The Rainbow Warrior III project is being overseen in Bremen by William Sykes, a 6ft 6in Glaswegian second-row forward, who points out to me some of the ship’s more unusual features – the advanced technology that will drop smaller inflatable speedboats from its sides at record speed for the quickest possible advance or getaway; the helicopter pad that can be created on deck; the below-deck radio room with its reinforced door built to allow at least 30 minutes transmission time in the event of the ship being boarded – as it has been in the past – by SAS-style commandos wielding axes. When it first embarked on the commissioning of the ship, Greenpeace canvassed staff at its 40 global offices to come up with a list of “wants and needs” for the project. As Ulrich von Eitzen, Greenpeace’s operations director, explains, “You can imagine that the wish list we got was quite a long one.” From it was developed a functional specification of 12 closely typed pages. One of the more insistent requirements, particularly from long-term crew members with the scent of old voyages to the Arctic or up the Amazon still vivid, was for a shower in each double cabin, as opposed to the scant communal facilities that had characterised previous boats. Keen attention was also paid to both the galley facilities and the sewage arrangements. As Sykes observes with a degree of pride, it is down to him to “get 10lb of shit into a 2lb bag”. His current focus in that mission is on 10 July when, having left its dry dock and been floated for the first time, the huge A-frame masts will be slotted into the ship’s deck. The date has a powerful significance: it’s the 26th anniversary of the bombing of the first Rainbow Warrior. Those who were on board that night have been following the progress of the new ship with a sense of expectation. When I phoned Peter Willcox, the captain in 1985, he was on board a yacht near his home in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. He has worked as a skipper for Greenpeace for 30 years, at sea for six months of most of them. He has been distantly involved with the plans for the new Warrior, but mostly, he says wryly, “they seemed happy to keep me about 4,000 miles away”. Once the Rainbow Warrior III has done a European tour of duty at the end of the year, and given supporters a chance to see what their £10 a month has helped to pay for, Willcox will join it in the Azores in January and take the helm to America. He will then sail it up the Amazon, on its maiden campaign, as part of the protest against deforestation. He still relives the day 26 years ago when he had to give the fateful shout to abandon ship. “One particularly moving thing for me,” he says “was the 20th anniversary of the bombing, when I got to meet Marelle Pereira – Fernando’s daughter. She is a remarkable woman who has gone through hell as a result of losing her father.” That anniversary was marked by the arrival of Rainbow Warrior II at Auckland and a special Maori ceremony. The second Rainbow Warrior, a recycled ship that went into service four years after the sinking, these days spends more time out of the water than in it and, at 52 years old, is about to be retired. Willcox, at 58, has no such plans. Things have changed over the years at Greenpeace, but one thing has not altered: “The atmosphere on the boats isn’t very different . There is still a group of people bound by a similar goal.” The job allows him to see the wonders of the planet as well as the way we abuse them. “The most memorable trip was a couple of years ago, going up to Greenland to do climate-change research,” he says. “We were up north of 80 degrees for seven weeks, kayaking in ice melt.” After that he was monitoring the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico – “just depressing”. Willcox is an optimist, but over the 30 years he has never felt as though they were winning. “Greenpeace may be taken more seriously than it was 40 years ago, but that’s partly because the planet is on its knees.” Still, he can’t wait to get out on Rainbow Warrior III, not least because “Greenpeace running around in big polluting motor vessels is not ideal. It is good to see us get serious about alternative technology, because if we don’t, how can we expect anyone else to?” For David Edward, a Yorkshireman who was engineer on the boat in 1985, there is a great feeling of continuity. Edward is now in charge of all Greenpeace vessels at sea, but he is closely watching progress in Bremen. For him, the bombing was the point at which Greenpeace grew up as an organisation. “I think it was a springboard for Greenpeace International. It made us even more determined,” he says. “But also lawyers are now a big part of Greenpeace.” For a long while after the first Rainbow Warrior was raised, Edward thought it should be repaired. Eventually, though, it became clear that the ship was going to be scuttled so he felt he should get back to his family in Yorkshire. Getting out for sea trials on the new boat in the coming months will feel like another sort of homecoming. “For me, it’s the closing of a circle,” he says. “When we were in New Zealand with the old Warrior, after the bombing, I would go round schools and kids would hand me pocket money to help us build a new ship. I like to think that that money has finally helped to pay for this new boat.” Of course Rainbow Warrior III has to be as much about the future as about the past. Everyone I speak to at Greenpeace talks about getting the balance right between the size of the organisation and the need to put all the energy not into bureaucracy but the sharp end of campaigning. Rainbow Warrior III encapsulates this balance. Greenpeace is not a homemade anarchic kind of concern any more, it is a sophisticated lobbying network, but it still wants to be at the cutting end of environmental defence. “One thing this boat says very clearly,” Ulrich von Eizen maintains, “is that we are still out there. At this very moment we have crews out on an oil rig trying to stop Arctic offshore drilling. We haven’t changed our attitude, and we will not be silenced.” Though Rainbow Warrior has a proud history, he suggests, the boat in Bremen is not an exercise in nostalgia. “Rainbow Warrior is a strong name. But 20-year-olds don’t necessarily know anything about it. This is not about preserving our past victories, it’s about the future. To keep on bearing witness.” The Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, 10 June 1985 By Steve Sawyer, former campaign leader on the ship The day of the bombing was my birthday. I was 29. And I guess it is the day I really grew up. All the talk about standing up for what you believe in became different after Fernando Pereira was killed on the Rainbow Warrior. I was interviewed immediately afterwards and asked if I thought the French had done it and I said I really didn’t believe they would do something so stupid. That aired Sunday night. And then on Monday morning they arrested the French spies who had planted the bombs, masquerading as a Swiss honeymooning couple. So you learn. After that I spent five or six years dealing with the court case, then became American director of Greenpeace and then international director. But that night stays with me. Having celebrated my birthday, I had gone off about 20 minutes before midnight to stay in a hotel across town, where I was meant to have a meeting the next day. We had just broken open a bottle of rum that I’d had for my birthday and were playing a game of pool, and the woman from the hotel said there was a phone call for me. It was a woman from Greenpeace New Zealand, who said there had been a fire and an explosion on the boat. So we piled into a car and drove back across town. The dock was cordoned off and the crew were across the street at the police station. I saw Chris Robinson, one of our skippers, who told me, “They blew up the boat and killed Fernando.” It took us some time to convince the police of those facts. They thought they were looking at a bunch of hippies with a big green boat. Their first reaction was, “How are you going to get your ship off the bottom of our harbour?” It was only when the divers went down the next day and found that the explosion had blown in and not out that the attitude of the police changed. The thing I remember most, though, was that we set up an office to try to deal with stuff and that afternoon people started arriving. Someone brought bags of clothes for us. Other stuff started coming. Someone set up a little kitchen in the office to feed the crew. Then people came with buckets of cash for us that they had collected on the street. They were giving, they said, for us to build a new boat. To keep on going. If you would like to make a donation towards Rainbow Warrior III go to greenpeace.org.uk/rainbow-warrior Greenpeace Activism Ethical and green living Tim Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Salman Rushdie says TV drama series have taken the place of novels

Booker-prizewinning novelist to write sci-fi drama for television, citing The Wire, The Sopranos and Mad Men as an inspiration Salman Rushdie is to make a sci-fi television series in the belief that quality TV drama has taken over from film and the novel as the best way of widely communicating ideas and stories. “It’s like the best of both worlds,” said the novelist in an interview with the Observer . “You can work in movie style productions, but have proper control.” The new work, to be called The Next People is being made for Showtime, a US cable TV network. The plot will be based in factual science, Rushdie said, but will contain elements of the supernatural or extra-terrestrial. Although filming is yet to begin, a pilot has been commissioned and written. It will have what Rushdie described as “an almost feature-film budget”. Showtime has announced that the hour-long drama will deal with the fast pace of change in modern life, covering the areas of politics, religion, science, technology and sexuality. “It’s a sort of paranoid science-fiction series, people disappearing and being replaced by other people,” said Rushdie, 63, best known for Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses . “It’s not exactly sci-fi, in that there is not an awful lot of science behind it, but there are certainly elements which are not naturalistic,” he said in the interview, which will appear in full in the Observer later this month. The idea that Rushdie might create a television show came from his US agents who suggested that he would have more creative influence than with a feature-film script. “They said to me that what I should really think about is a TV series, because what has happened in America is that the quality – or the writing quality – of movies has gone down the plughole. “If you want to make a $300m special effects movie from a comic book, then fine. But if you want to make a more serious movie… I mean you have no idea how hard it was to raise the money for Midnight’s Children .” Deepa Mehta, an Oscar-nominated director, is currently making a film version of Rushdie’s 1981 Booker Prize winning novel, under the title Winds of Change , that will be co-scripted by the author. “I’m in this position where, for the first time in my writing life, I don’t have a novel on the go, but I have a movie and a memoir and a TV series,” said Rushdie, who is working on an account of the most famous and troubled era of his life – the period when his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses put him at the centre of a dangerous international controversy. In 1989, Tehran radio broadcast a fatwa, or religious edict, from the Ayatollah Khomeini, the spiritual leader of Iran, which called the book blasphemous and put a price on the author’s head. Rushdie lived through the next decade in hiding. The former advertising copywriter’s first novel Grimus , was partly science fiction and his novels since have often been described as examples of the vivid literary school of “magical realism”. Rushdie agreed that “my writing has always had elements of the fantastical” but said that he was drawn to television by the comparatively high status of the writer in the process. “In the movies the writer is just the servant, the employee. In television, the 60-minute series, The Wire and Mad Men and so on, the writer is the primary creative artist. “You have control in the way that you never have in the cinema. The Sopranos was David Chase, West Wing was Aaron Sorkin,” he explained. Rushdie said that he is also considering doing much of the writing for an ensuing series alone. “Matthew Wiener on Mad Men writes the entire series before they start shooting, and if you have that, then what you can do with character and story is not at all unlike what you can do in a novel.” The Next People is being made by Working Title, the film company behind many of the most successful British Films of the last 20 years from Four Weddings and A Funeral to Bean, Shaun of the Dead and the Nanny McPhee films. Rushdie has written the first draft of the script and will executive-produce the show, alongside British producers Tim Bevan, Eric Fellner and Shelley McCrory, the former NBC executive who runs the company’s TV projects. Salman Rushdie US television Vanessa Thorpe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

A dramatic global increase in jellyfish swarms could damage the marine food chain Global warming has long been blamed for the huge rise in the world’s jellyfish population. But new research suggests that they, in turn, may be worsening the problem by producing more carbon than the oceans can cope with. Research led by Rob Condon of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in the US focuses on the effect that the increasing numbers of jellyfish are having on marine bateria, which play an important role by recycling nutrients created by decaying organisms back into the food web. The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , finds that while bacteria are capable of absorbing the constituent carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and other chemicals given off by most fish when they die, they cannot do the same with jellyfish. The invertebrates, populating the seas in ever-increasing numbers, break down into biomass with especially high levels of carbon, which the bacteria cannot absorb well. Instead of using it to grow, the bacteria breathe it out as carbon dioxide. This means more of the gas is released into the atmosphere. Dr Carol Turley, a scientist at Plymouth University’s Marine Laboratory, said the research highlighted the growing problem of ocean acidification, the so-called “evil twin” of global warming. “Oceans have been taking up 25% of the carbon dioxide that man has produced over the last 200 years, so it’s been acting as a buffer for climate change. When you add more carbon dioxide to sea water it becomes more acidic. And already that is happening at a rate that hasn’t occurred in 600 million years.” The acidification of the oceans is already predicted to have such a corrosive effect that unprotected shellfish will dissolve by the middle of the century.” Condon’s research also found that the spike in jellyfish numbers is also turning the marine food cycle on its head. The creatures devour huge quantities of plankton, thus depriving small fish of the food they need. “This restricts the transfer of energy up the food chain because jellyfish are not readily consumed by other predators,” said Condon. The increase in the jellyfish population has been attributed to factors including climate change, over-fishing and the runoff of agricultural fertilisers. The rise in sea temperature and the elimination of predators such as sharks and tuna has made conditions ideal, and “blooms” – when populations explode in great swarms, sparking regular panics on beaches around the world– are being reported in ever-increasing size and frequency. Last year scientists at the University of British Columbia found that global warming was causing 2,000 different jellyfish species to appear earlier each year and expanding their number. The proliferation of jellyfish has caused problems for seaside power and desalination plants in Japan, the Middle East and Africa . The blooms are also perilous to swimmers; the effects of a jellyfish sting range across the species from painless to tingling to agony and death. Marine life Wildlife Oceans Carbon emissions Climate change Tracy McVeigh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cuts threaten safety at Ministry of Defence sites, warns report

Defence Environment and Safety Board warns that austerity will ‘undoubtedly place a severe strain on systems’ An official Ministry of Defence report has warned that cutbacks threaten to compromise safety at the UK’s leading military sites and on its aircraft, submarines and ships. The Defence Environment and Safety Board is the senior panel that reports to ministers about all aspects of safety across the MoD estate, including nuclear weapons sites. Its 2010 report, just published , concludes that, while the outcome of the government’s ongoing defence reform review is unclear, “the need to reduce costs and the severe reduction in personnel numbers will undoubtedly place a severe strain on safety systems”. It finds there has been “little evidence of improvement” in safety levels since last year and notes the number of safety-related deaths of MoD personnel more than doubled over the year, rising from 7 to 15. In addition, four Crown Improvement Notices, requiring urgent action to tackle safety shortcomings, were issued last year, compared with none in 2009. The report warns: “It will become increasingly difficult to maintain that the defence nuclear programmes are being managed with due regard for the protection of the workforce, the public and the environment”, noting the principal threats to safety in the medium term “are the adequacy of resources… and the maintenance of a sustainable cadre of suitably competent staff”. “A private company would never be able to get away with such a poor safety performance as that shown by the Ministry of Defence,” said Peter Burt, of the Nuclear Information Service, which is opposed to nuclear weapons. The report also says much of the military’s fuels storage infrastructure must be classed as high risk, because it “is beyond its designated life” and “falls below current legislative requirements in key areas”. Defence policy Public sector cuts Nuclear weapons Public services policy Public finance Jamie Doward guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
£342m on rents for fire brigade sites which will stand empty

Total spend on the scrapped FireControl call centres scheme will be more than half a billion More than half a billion pounds of taxpayers’ money has been committed to providing the fire service with eight empty buildings that will never be used for their intended purpose. FireControl, a private finance initiative to replace England’s 46 emergency call centres with nine regional sites, became mired in technical problems that proved fatal to the scheme. The eight sites outside London have been cancelled, although the London site will go ahead. But, in spite of the scheme’s partial demise last year, the Observer has established that £342m of taxpayers’ money is committed to paying rent on the empty sites that will never be used to house the new system. Because the properties were purpose-built, it is unclear how they could be converted to an alternative use. Several of the empty properties are owned by anonymous trusts and companies, two of which are based in the tax haven of Jersey. The rent commitments mean the taxpayer is now paying £1.4m each month on the empty buildings at a time when the government is implementing swingeing cuts. Coming amid the financial crisis gripping the Southern Cross care homes, the debacle is likely to raise fresh questions about the merits of bringing in the private sector to help run vital services. Sources close to the trusts have confirmed privately that there is nothing the government can do to extricate itself from the deals and that it will be obliged to pay the rents for the entirety of the contracts, which range from 20 to 25 years. The £342m commitment is in addition to the £40m that the government has been forced to write off on the IT systems for FireControl. A further £140m in “project management costs” that went to civil servants and consultants takes the total amount spent on the failed system to £522m. The project was largely scrapped in December, although it will continue to be rolled out across London ahead of the Olympics at an estimated cost of £60m. The Observer has established that five of the empty buildings – in Wolverhampton, Wakefield, Durham, Cambridge and Castle Donington – are controlled by Control Centre General Partner (CGCP), an offshore company based in Jersey and owned by a City investment bank, Evans Randall. CGCP is an investment vehicle established by Evans Randall on behalf of clients seeking a stable return on their investments. The company has raised tens of millions of pounds from wealthy investors in the Middle East in the past, although it declined to say who has invested in CGCP. Another empty building, in Warrington, is owned by AAIM Warrington Unit Trust, also based in Jersey. The pensions firm Canada Life owns another in Kite’s Croft, Hampshire, while a private lettings company, Leafrange, based in Leytonstone, east London, owns one in Taunton. Aviva, the financial services company, owns the remaining building in London, which is still intended for its original use. At a time when trade unions warn that the fire service is facing massive cuts, the wasted money is likely to be a huge concern to ministers. The figures involved dwarf the revelation last month that the NHS is spending £2.8m a year on empty buildings. “This is a public scandal when frontline fire services are being decimated because of budget cuts,” said the Fire Brigades Union’s general secretary, Matt Wrack. “The frontline is being slashed, while offshore property speculators are raking in millions of pounds for empty buildings, which will never be used for the purpose they were built.” The rent commitments massively exceed the costs of constructing the buildings. The empty Durham property cost only £12.4m to build, but will cost the taxpayer £31m over the next 20 years. The cost of equipping the buildings has also raised eyebrows. Brian Coleman, chairman of the London Fire Brigade, told parliament’s local government select committee that a £25,000 coffee machine had been installed in the London centre. The National Audit Office is due to publish a report on FireControl in July that is expected to be strongly critical of the way the deal was structured. A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government said it would offer the purpose-built buildings to other tenants if the fire service did not use them. “Our aim is to be fair to fire and rescue services and achieve the best possible value for money for the taxpayer,” he said. Even if this proposal is successful, the income generated is unlikely to match even a fraction of the rent commitments on the properties agreed by the previous Labour government. Firefighters Public sector cuts Jamie Doward guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘Cuckold’ case will test the limits of the internet

Plumber whose wife had a 10-year affair was investigated by an elite serious crime unit and faces charges for pursuing his grievances online A plumber who used the internet to highlight his wife’s affair with a director of one of the world’s largest financial companies will appear in court on harassment charges. Lawyers believe the case could help define the limits of free expression on the internet. Ian Puddick, 41, from east London, was incensed after learning that his wife had conducted a 10-year relationship with her boss, a director of Guy Carpenter, a reinsurance company that advises clients on risk management. Puddick pleaded guilty to harassment charges in an earlier trial after admitting that he telephoned the company’s directors to alert them to the affair and had visited the home of his love rival. However, since the original court case he has set up a series of websites, a Twitter account and a blog to draw further attention to the affair, alleging that the director, who he named, was pursuing an affair with his wife on the company’s time and expenses, a claim rejected by Guy Carpenter. The company maintains that Puddick’s actions forced the director to leave his position due to stress. Puddick’s legal team are expected to use the three-day hearing at Westminster magistrates court to examine the actions of the City of London police, which dispatched its serious crime unit to raid his home and office in search of evidence. Puddick’s legal team is seeking to summon a number of Guy Carpenter’s executives to appear at his trial, a move that promises unwanted publicity for a company that likes to keep a relatively low profile. Internal Guy Carpenter emails obtained by Puddick’s legal team and seen by the Observer show that the firm employed a subsidiary – Kroll, a global private investigation agency used by many blue chip companies – in its quest to establish that Puddick was waging a harassment campaign. Kroll briefed Guy Carpenter executives that the police had “offered significant assistance” in dealing with Puddick, whom it believed might be “dangerously unstable”. One Kroll director emailed several Guy Carpenter executives on 23 July 2009, following a meeting with City police. “They … warn that the penalties for harassment are not very severe, unless you reoffend, and that the prosecution will be out of our control once the police and the Criminal Prosecution Service agree there is a case to answer. We should remember Puddick may relish the prospect of a day in court.” The email continues: “The civil route has the advantage of us being able to cease the prosecution at any stage, and tougher penalties. However, if the police take this on we can avoid being seen to have any role in prosecuting Puddick, which also has advantages. One way to combine the two may be to talk to Puddick post arrest, and warn him of our options in the civil courts to stop him

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Allows His Guests to Pretend Romney Should be Taken Seriously as Someone Who Can Run on Our Bad Economy

Click here to view this media In yet another pitiful example of our D.C. beltway Villagers not doing their jobs, Chris Matthews and his panel of the Huffington Post’s Howard Fineman and USA Today’s Susan Page allowed the viewers of his audience to think that Mitt Romney should somehow be considered a serious candidate for president because he somehow would know something about putting our economy back on track because he was a former business owner. This is going to be one of the things that I continue to go after these Villagers in the press for until they either finally quit lying about Mitt Romney and his record as a “job creator”, or until he drops out of the 2012 presidential race, or until we’re in the unfortunate circumstance of somehow having him elected as our next president, in which case the hounding on this matter will no longer make any difference. I really get tired of it when someone like Matthews or Fineman does it since they get painted as “liberals” by conservative blogs and media which neither of them are. They’re both the epitome of most of what is wrong with our beltway press being too close to those they cover and more worried about their invitation to the next cocktail party or who they have access to for their next article or interview instead of doing any honest reporting on those they socialize with or that they they can get some scoop from that talks to them. Shame on Tweety and on Howard Fineman for painting this guy as some savior for job creation. It’s really a pathetic day when we get more honest reporting from a comedy show than what tries to pass itself for a “news” program on our so-called “liberal” channel, MSNBC. Here’s Colbert again on how Mittens should be treated in the press when anyone spouts this “job creator” nonsense.

Continue reading …