Happy to see that USUncut NYC isn’t slowing down their efforts to educate people: On Saturday, June 11, 2011, US Uncut NYC, joined by members from NY Communities for Change and Coalition for Public Education, brought their pillows, sleeping bags, and pjs to Bank of America at 880 Quincy Street in Bedford Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. The sleep-in/teach-in was an expression of solidarity with the millions of taxpayers who have been driven from their homes, in many cases illegally and in all cases immorally, by the same banks that received trillions of taxpayer dollars when their fraudulent lending practices and reckless investments threatened to bring down the world financial system. Symbolically representing the dispossessed, participants arrived with sleeping bags, blankets and pajamas to take up residence (however briefly) in the bank that has been the worst offender of all the big banks. As disclosed in literature given to clients of the bank, passers-by, and even the police, Bank of America has used “robo signers” who perjured themselves in foreclosure proceedings and is facing numerous lawsuits, including a class action suit involving homeowners in 17 states and suits by the federal government and the attorneys general of Arizona and Nevada. It has also been accused of violating the False Claims Acts and defrauding taxpayers by their handling of foreclosures on homes purchased with government-backed loans. The teach-in was conducted by Jonathan Tasini, a long-time labor activist, writer and strategist and the former president of the National Writers Union. Mr. Tasini reviewed the causes of the financial meltdown of 2008 and how those responsible ended up even stronger than before while average Americans fell further and further behind. He spoke of how the “crisis” was being used as an excuse to slash public services instead of requiring the banks and other major corporations that had been starving public coffers to pay their fair share of taxes. Tasini reminded those gathered that it is incumbent on ordinary citizens like themselves, uniting together in direct actions like the one today, to inform and energize the public and thereby to force the politicians to respond to public rather than corporate needs. The protestors left the bank when ordered to by the police, and the teach-in continued outside. Local residents in Bedford Stuyvesant were uniformly supportive of the action, taking literature, pausing to hear the lecture and offering their own stories of encounters with the bank .
Continue reading …Republicans demand resignation of nuclear agency head after he is found to have acted improperly in shutting down project Republicans in Congress demanded the resignation of the head of America’s nuclear agency on Tuesday after it emerged he acted improperly in stopping work on a controversial nuclear waste dump. Gregory Jaczko, who was appointed by Barack Obama to oversee safety at America’s 100 nuclear reactors, had unilaterally shut down preparatory work on the Yucca Mountain project, Hubert Bell, the inspector general of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), said in prepared testimony. Jaczko, who was supposed to be politically neutral, was also highly selective in sharing information with his fellow regulators at the NRC about the dump project. Some of those he did inform did not fully understand he was working to close the project. Those kept in the dark opposed plans to shut the dump. “He was not forthcoming with the other commissioners,” Bell said in his prepared testimony to the house energy and commerce committee. Jaczko did not break the law, Bell said. But his strategic control of information, and his management style, raised questions about his leadership and his political independence. Bell went over many of those concerns in an investigative report last week. Republicans in Congress are strongly pro-nuclear, and have been pushing the Obama administration to move forward on the Yucca Mountain dump as part of a plan to radically expand America’s fleet of nuclear reactors. Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas, insisted the NRC chairman step down. “He violated the law,” Barton said. Ed Whitfield, a Republican from Kentucky, said Jaczko had abused his authority. “I do think he needs to step down,” he said. Even Democrats in Congress criticised Jaczko’s management style, raising concerns about his temper. “Obviously he should work on his interpersonal skills,” said Henry Waxman, the California Democrat who once headed the committee. Underlining the Republican outrage was the accusation that Jaczko was acting at the behest of Obama and the Senate majority leader Harry Reid, who both want to shut down Yucca Mountain to please local interests in Nevada. Jaczko used to work for Reid, and Reid represents Nevada. The Democratic leadership argues instead that the original choice of siting the waste dump in Nevada was itself highly political. Obama promised in 2009 to cancel the project. Local opposition in Nevada has effectively kept Yucca Mountain in limbo for nearly 30 years. The federal government has spent $15bn (£9.16bn) on the project so far, and it is still 10 years away from completion. But the Fukushima nuclear disaster, which exposed the dangers of storing spent nuclear fuel at reactors, has given new urgency to safety concerns about nuclear waste. The US nuclear industry currently stores its nuclear waste at reactor sites scattered across the country. Obama, despite his opposition to the dump, remains a strong proponent of nuclear energy. The NRC is due to issue its first licence for a new reactor in more than 30 years. But America cannot significantly increase the number of reactors without coming up with a working solution on storage of nuclear waste. US politics Republicans Barack Obama United States Nuclear waste Energy Nuclear power Waste Suzanne Goldenberg guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Anti-crime activists attack government after judge frees former mayor of Tijuana at whose home officials say they found 88 guns The Mexican government of Felipe Calderón has been left with egg on its face after a judge ordered the release of a former Tijuana mayor arrested earlier this month when dozens of firearms were allegedly discovered in a raid on his mansion. The federal judge released Jorge Hank Rhon saying there was insufficient evidence to indict the 55-year-old gambling magnate and politician, despite reports from officials that 88 guns were found at his sprawling complex in Tijuana. Hank Rhon – a father of 19 – is famed for his fortune, machismo, and exotic animals. But he did not get to enjoy his freedom for long, as he was immediately taken to the state prosecutor’s office for questioning over murders reportedly committed with two of the guns. Hank Rhon was arrested in the early hours of 4 June after soldiers entered his home, which stretches up a hill from the racetrack he owns. The compound also includes a private bullring and zoo populated by white Bengal tigers, guacamayas and other rare animals. The attorney general, Marisela Morales, said Hank Rhon had no permits for 78 of the weapons said to have been found, which comprised 40 rifles and 48 handguns. The raid also yielded 9,298 bullets, 70 ammunition clips and a gas grenade. The judge who ordered Hank Rhon’s release in the early hours of Tuesday morning also freed 10 of his employees detained during the raid. The former mayor left the jail before dawn and was taken to an office of the state prosecution service for questioning, after ballistic tests that allegedly linked two of the seized handguns to murders in Tijuana. Officials said the tests indicated that one of the guns had been used to kill a security guard in December 2009 and the other to kill a car salesman in June 2010. State human rights ombudsman Heriberto Garcia, called in to monitor the case by Hank Rhon’s lawyers, said the local authorities were seeking a judge’s order to allow them to hold him for a maximum of 30 days while the investigations continued. Hank Rhon is a member of a political clan associated with the Institutional Revolutionary party (PRI), which governed from 1929 to 2000. His supporters claim the arrest was politically motivated. His father, Carlos Hank González, was one of Mexico’s most durable powerbrokers. He died in 2001 with an estimated US$1.3bn (£800m) fortune and reputedly coined the Mexican phrase “a politician who is poor is a poor politician”. Anti-crime activists were outraged by the news of Hank Rhon’s release. “This is another farce from the government of President Calderón,” said Eduardo Gallo, one of the leading figures of a growing movement deeply critical of the government’s claims to be hounding major criminals. “The state lacks the ability and the moral authority to tackle organised crime. The law in Mexico is never applied against those with money and political power.” Hank Rhon’s business empire, centred on the racetrack, includes hotels, shopping malls and gaming houses across Mexico. He was elected mayor in 2004, but stepped down in 2006 to fight an unsuccessful campaign to become state governor.While the accusations against him are legion, he has never come so close to facing formal charges. A former bodyguard is currently in prison for the murder of reporter Hector “El Gato” Felix of the local weekly magazine Zeta in 1988. In 1995 he was briefly detained after a suitcase full of ivory tusks and waistcoats made of the skins of endangered ocelots was found. Hank Rhon’s arrest has prompted accusations of orchestration by Calderón as part of an attempt to derail the PRI´s campaign in upcoming elections in Mexico state. Enrique Peña Nieto, the current PRI governor, was mentored by Hank Rhon’s clan and is the runaway favourite to win the 2012 presidential elections. The federal release order is highly embarrassing for the government. Mexico Jo Tuckman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Of course, this is why the race between Prosser and Kloppenburg was so critical to both sides. The Wisconsin Supreme Court leans toward the ultra-conservative side of the spectrum with Prosser on it. And so it goes. Via the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel : Madison – Acting with unusual speed, the state Supreme Court on Tuesday reinstated Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to all but end collective bargaining for tens of thousands of public workers. The court found a committee of lawmakers was not subject to the state’s open meetings law, and so did not violate that law when they hastily approved the measure and made it possible for the Senate to take it up. In doing so, the Supreme Court overruled a Dane County judge who had struck down the legislation, ending one challenge to the law even as new challenges are likely to emerge. The majority opinion was by Justices Michael Gableman, David Prosser, Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler. The other three justices -Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and N. Patrick Crooks – concurred in part and dissented in part. Update: Via WisPolitics Budget , the link to the justices’ decision . Some examples from the decision — no partisan language here, oh no: This court has granted the petition for an original action because one of the courts that we are charged with supervising has usurped the legislative power which the Wisconsin Constitution grants exclusively to the legislature. …the legislature did not employ a process that violated Article IV, Section 10 of the Wisconsin Constitution, which provides in relevant part: “The doors of each house shall be kept open except when the public welfare shall require secrecy.” The doors of the senate and assembly were kept open to the press and members of the public during the enactment of the Act. The doors of the senate parlor, where the joint committee on conference met, were open to the press and members of the public. WisconsinEye broadcast the proceedings live. Access was not denied. But of course, the substituted bill was done behind closed doors. Which they address here: It is undisputed that the legislature posted notices of the March 9, 2011 meeting of the joint committee on conference on three bulletin boards, approximately 1 hour and 50 minutes before the start of the meeting. In the posting of notice that was done, the legislature relied on its interpretation of its own rules of proceeding. The court declines to review the validity of the procedure used to give notice of the joint committee on conference.
Continue reading …Of course, this is why the race between Prosser and Kloppenburg was so critical to both sides. The Wisconsin Supreme Court leans toward the ultra-conservative side of the spectrum with Prosser on it. And so it goes. Via the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel : Madison – Acting with unusual speed, the state Supreme Court on Tuesday reinstated Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to all but end collective bargaining for tens of thousands of public workers. The court found a committee of lawmakers was not subject to the state’s open meetings law, and so did not violate that law when they hastily approved the measure and made it possible for the Senate to take it up. In doing so, the Supreme Court overruled a Dane County judge who had struck down the legislation, ending one challenge to the law even as new challenges are likely to emerge. The majority opinion was by Justices Michael Gableman, David Prosser, Patience Roggensack and Annette Ziegler. The other three justices -Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and N. Patrick Crooks – concurred in part and dissented in part. Update: Via WisPolitics Budget , the link to the justices’ decision . Some examples from the decision — no partisan language here, oh no: This court has granted the petition for an original action because one of the courts that we are charged with supervising has usurped the legislative power which the Wisconsin Constitution grants exclusively to the legislature. …the legislature did not employ a process that violated Article IV, Section 10 of the Wisconsin Constitution, which provides in relevant part: “The doors of each house shall be kept open except when the public welfare shall require secrecy.” The doors of the senate and assembly were kept open to the press and members of the public during the enactment of the Act. The doors of the senate parlor, where the joint committee on conference met, were open to the press and members of the public. WisconsinEye broadcast the proceedings live. Access was not denied. But of course, the substituted bill was done behind closed doors. Which they address here: It is undisputed that the legislature posted notices of the March 9, 2011 meeting of the joint committee on conference on three bulletin boards, approximately 1 hour and 50 minutes before the start of the meeting. In the posting of notice that was done, the legislature relied on its interpretation of its own rules of proceeding. The court declines to review the validity of the procedure used to give notice of the joint committee on conference.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media CNN’s John King decided to turn the second GOP Republican debate in New Hampshire, and I use that term lightly, into an even bigger joke than it was already with his “this or that” segments at the beginning and end of every commercial break during their broadcast. John King asked such hard-hitting questions as Leno or Conan to Rick Santorum, Elvis or Johnny Cash to Michele Bachmann, Dancing with the Stars or American Idol to Newt Gingrich, Blackberry or iPhone to Ron Paul, deep dish or thin crust to Herman Cain, spicey or mild wings to Mitt Romney and Coke or Pepsi to Tim Pawlenty. What was actually more pitiful was the complete lack of follow up during what was supposed to be some of the more “serious” discussions during this “debate” where the candidates were allowed to lie continually without being called out for it. Think Progress did a live blog of the debate that included some much needed fact checking that CNN’s John King was apparently unwilling to do during this fiasco here — Live-Blogging The GOP Primary Debate . King also inadvertently turned this into a running joke on Twitter where users there were posting their own questions as a substitute for King’s under the hashtag #thisorthat.
Continue reading …A $10 million UK trial involving police corruption, a $32,000 BMW and Premier League match tickets collapsed after a juror admitted to contacting the case’s defendant on Facebook. Former juror Joanne Fraill, 40, decided to have a chat with defendant Jamie Sewart, 34, about her ongoing juicy drug gang trial in Manchester, England last year.
Continue reading …Shawn Tyson has denied April murder of James Cooper and James Kouzaris in Newtown, Sarasota A youth accused of shooting dead two British holidaymakers in a crime-ridden Florida neighbourhood confessed to a fellow inmate shortly after he was arrested, according to newly released court documents. Shawn Tyson, 16, has denied killing James Cooper, 25, and James Kouzaris, 24, as they staggered drunkenly through Newtown, Sarasota, in the early hours of 16 April after a night out drinking. But, according to prosecutors, Tyson told the prisoner: “Yeah, I did it” only 24 hours after the shooting. The inmate said he asked what had happened and Tyson replied: “It’s trill,” – a slang word for “gangster”. In a recorded phone call from the Sarasota county jail to another witness known only as “brother”, Tyson apparently lamented the discovery by detectives of bullets at his house of the same calibre used to murder the Britons. “They found the bullets. That’s the only thing that’s going to fuck me up,” he told the friend. The same witness told police Tyson claimed he approached the Britons from behind after watching them stagger along the road and that he went to “fire off” at them because he assumed they were trying to break into a vehicle. The new details come in about 300 pages of documents released by the state attorney’s office in Sarasota that set out the largely circumstantial case against Tyson, who has been in custody for almost two months after being charged as an adult on two counts of first degree homicide. Included are witness statements that shed light for the first time on how Cooper and Kouzaris travelled to The Courts housing project, seven miles from the upmarket Longboat Key resort where they were enjoying a three-week holiday with Cooper’s family. The question had puzzled detectives for weeks until a taxi driver came forward to report that he remembered picking up two men “with British accents” at the Smokin’ Joes bar in central Sarasota and driving them to a 7-Eleven late-night grocery store in Newtown. Kouzaris, from Northampton, and Cooper, from Warwick, were caught on CCTV drinking in the bar just before closing time, about an hour before they were found dead in the street in Newtown, two miles away, shirtless and with multiple gunshot wounds. Medical records released by the Sarasota coroner, meanwhile, show that the pair, who became friends as students at the University of Sheffield, had blood alcohol levels more than three times Florida’s legal limit for driving. Although the documents reveal how the pair got to Newtown, they appear to stoke further speculation as to what they were doing there. A neighbour who lives close to the murder scene allegedly told police that she believed one of the Britons had previously visited her neighbour’s boyfriend. Another female resident of The Courts, listed only as a “confidential informant”, told detectives that she saw Tyson leaping in through the open window of his mother’s house within moments of the shooting. She identified Tyson as one of two people she saw running away. She said she heard shots then a neighbour told her that someone had been killed. Sarasota police, who have previously admitted they were seeking a second suspect, are investigating another shooting in Newtown, in which a 21-year-old was killed. Willie Hadley, 21, who lived less than a mile from where Cooper and Kouzaris were shot, was gunned down during the early hours of Monday on Martin Luther Way, five blocks from the scene of the April shooting. Police called to the scene at 2am found Hadley, who had been released from jail only a few days previously, lying dead in the road after local residents reported hearing gunfire. Tyson’s trial is expected to take place next year. He faces a probable life sentence if convicted. Gun crime United States Florida Richard Luscombe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Prime minister attempts to make virtue of policy U-turns and revised timetable for change David Cameron issued a robust defence of his decision to introduce “substantive” changes to the government’s NHS reforms, hailing the move as a “sign of strength”. As Ed Miliband accused the prime minister of planning to waste billions of pounds in a “bureaucratic reorganisation”, the prime minister said the revisions would allow the NHS to thrive as a service free at the point of delivery. The government has been under in recent weeks fire for embarking on a series of policy U-turns, most notably its plans to water down health secretary Andrew Lansley’s proposals for greater competition to the NHS and to hand 65% of the NHS budget to new GP-led consortiums. The prime minister, who outlined significant alterations to Lansley’s blueprint at Guy’s hospital in London, tried to make a virtue of his change of heart. Standing alongside Nick Clegg and Lansley, he said: “Politicians aren’t very good at saying, we didn’t get it right first time. Politicians hate it if they ever get anything wrong. “But actually I think people respect a government that feels it is strong enough to say, hold on, we haven’t got every element right, we’re not taking enough people with us, let’s stop, let’s get this right. That is what you do in any other walk of life, so it seems perfectly good common sense to do it in government. I think people respect that. “I think it is a sign of strength to pause, to change, to improve and to recognise you’ll have a pretty uncomfortable couple of months and people will throw a few bricks at you. But so what? “The NHS is too precious, this is too important not to get it right. I absolutely think we have done the right thing. I think it has been a good process. I really paid tribute to the Future Forum and the way they have run it. We have had a massive engagement and as a result we have [emerged] much stronger and can now go ahead.” The prime minister defended his performance after the government accepted the bulk of a report on the health and social care bill by an independent panel of experts. Cameron appointed the Future Forum in April amid Liberal Democrat concerns about creeping privatisation and Tory fears that it was jeopardising his work in neutralising the NHS as an issue on which voters used to distrust the Conservatives. He announced that the bill will be amended to make clear that the primary duty of Monitor, the health service regulator, is not to promote competition. It will only do that if it helps patients. Cameron said: “You wanted us to make clear that competition isn’t there for its own sake, but to make life better for patients – done.” The membership of the new GP-led consortiums will be opened up. “You wanted us to get specialists, not just GPs, on commissioning groups – done,” Cameron said. “You wanted us to join up the different parts of the NHS, to put integration right at the heart of our reforms – done. We have listened, we have learned, and we are improving our plans for the NHS. We come here today with a substantive package of changes.” Among other changes to the plans: • Clegg announced that the proposal to allow “any qualified provider” to deliver NHS services will be introduced at a slower pace. • Lansley confirmed that his original 2013 deadline should be relaxed. The department also confirmed that the “relevant parts” of the health and social care bill will be sent back for consideration at the Commons committee stage. Sir Stephen Bubb, who runs the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations and who wrote the competition chapter in the Future Forum report, indicated that the changes would make little difference to the level of competition in the NHS. Asked on Channel 4 News whether there would be more or less competition or whether it would remain the same, Bubb said: “I suspect it will.” Miliband said: “The best thing the government could do is go back to the drawing board because they are still going ahead with a bureaucratic reorganisation.” Cameron and Clegg had an awkward moment when they were interrupted as they chatted to a patient in a ward at Guy’s for the benefit of the cameras. “Excuse me, I’m the senior orthopaedic surgeon in this department,” a man said, as he took exception to a camera crew and Downing Street aides on the grounds that they had not taken the correct measures to comply with hospital hygiene rules. “Why is it that we’re all told to walk around like this and these people … ” he added as he stormed out. Cameron told his staff to leave the ward. David Cameron NHS Health policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Andrew Lansley Ed Miliband GPs Health Public services policy Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mitt Romney, the presidential frontrunner, topped in debate by the congresswoman who also poses threat to Sarah Palin No sooner had Michele Bachmann hijacked the Republican presidential contenders’ debate to declare she is indeed a candidate for the White House than her newly minted campaign website said she is on her way to “reclaim America”. Americans may know far less about the first congresswoman from Minnesota than they do of that other darling of the Tea Party movement, Sarah Palin. But they are about to learn fast. Her performance in Monday night’s Republican candidates’ debate marked her out as a serious threat, not only to Palin’s ambitions but by having the potential to force issues onto the agenda – even if she faces an uphill struggle to build enough support to win the nomination. Politico rated her as runner-up in the debate to the favourite in the early stages of the long race for the nomination, Mitt Romney , in part because “she did not say anything embarrassing or scary”. Others thought she did better than Romney, using her ascribed twin weapons of bluntness and charm to make the men in the debate look hesitant. Bachmann, 55, believes her country needs to be reclaimed from a socialist president, a gay mafia, and treasonous liberals, responsible for, among other things, robbing Americans of the freedom to choose their light bulbs. It’s a far cry from Bachmann’s first dabble in politics as a student in Jimmy Carter’s 1976 campaign for president. She said at the time she was attracted by Carter’s deep religious convictions, a constant in her life, but was ultimately disillusioned by his support for abortion rights and his economic policies. Four years later, Bachmann campaigned for Ronald Reagan. From then on, she was on her way to becoming a Tea Partier avant la lettre, rising through the Minnesota state legislature and into the US Congress in 2007 with an increasingly strident conservatism built around the belief that big government flies in the face of the America imagined by its founding fathers. She did not shy from making clear she was driven by her Lutheran beliefs including her decision to bear five children and foster 23 more. Neither did she hide her belief that those who disagreed with her were somehow disloyal to the country, once calling the then presidential candidate Barack Obama anti-American. Questioned on the issue, she went on to suggest that some of her fellow members of Congress might be similarly flawed: “Are they pro-America or anti-America?” No issue appears to rile Bachmann more than gay marriage, and homosexual rights in general, which she sees as a vast and spreading conspiracy to change the sexuality of the nation’s children. She has accused the courts of rulings intended to indoctrinate the young. “What a bizarre time we’re in, when a judge will say to little children that you can’t say the pledge of allegiance, but you must learn that homosexuality is normal and you should try it,” she said on one occasion. (The words “under God” were added to the US oath of loyalty in 1954, and in 2005 a California judge said he would if asked stop teachers making children in their charge repeat the oath.) On another occasion, Bachmann said that teaching children the achievements of gay men was a means of promoting homosexuality. “Very effective way to do this with a bunch of second graders is take The Lion King for instance, and a teacher might say, ‘Do you know the music for this movie was written by a gay man?’ The message is: ‘I’m better at what I do, because I’m gay’,” she said. Bachmann is also famed for getting her history wrong, truncating the fight to abolish slavery by a century. “We also know that the very founders that wrote those documents [the constitution] worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the US,” she said. Her legislative initiatives include the Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act in an attempt to overturn the phasing-out of incandescent bulbs, She has also dismissed global warming as a hoax. She has even gone so far as to suggest that recent swine flu scare may have been the fault of the Obama administration by noting that a similar outbreak occurred “under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter”. “I’m not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it’s an interesting coincidence,” she said. It is those kind of statements that have left Bachmann with a long way to go to win over the independents and mainstream Republicans who are crucial to taking the White House. But Monday’s performance did her no harm. “Bachmann all but stole the show at the Republican presidential debate,” said Howard Kurtz of the Daily Beast. “She offered a passionate and inclusive defence of the Tea Party, saying that unlike the distorted picture painted by the media, the movement includes ‘disaffected Democrats’, ‘independents’, ‘libertarians’ and ‘people who’ve never been political a day in their lives’. Not bad for a rookie who kept smiling as she reeled off her best lines.” The most crucial endorsement came from the senator regarded as godfather of the movement, Jim DeMint, who said: “Bachmann does impress. She should not be underestimated.” Not what Palin wants to hear. Michele Bachmann Republican presidential nomination 2012 Tea Party movement Mitt Romney Sarah Palin Gay rights Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …