Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 894)
Ed Schultz: Facts and Logic Have No Place in GOP Making Bachmann the Perfect Fit

When possibly the most biased person on television questions your veracity and sanity after you appear in a Republican presidential debate, you know you've done a good job. It is precisely for that reason Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) should be pleased with being slighted by Ed Schultz who said on the MSNBC program bearing his name Tuesday, “Facts and logic have no place in the Republican Party. That’s why Bachmann I guess you could say is the perfect fit” (video follows with transcript and commentary): ED SCHULTZ: Bachmann for that matter is exactly what the modern Republican Party is all about. Bachmann has never voted for a tax increase. She believes government is the problem and the free market is going to save everything in America. Facts and logic have no place in the Republican Party. That’s why Bachmann I guess you could say is the perfect fit. Republican policy has systematically destroyed the middle class in America for years, but Bachmann is her Party’s biggest cheerleader as well. Isn't there a saying about idiots in glass houses? And what's to be said about an hour-long program on a so-called “news network” that covered important issues of the day including Monday's Republican presidential debate without any commentary from people on the right side of the aisle? Schultz's guests Tuesday evening included two Democrats from the state of Wisconsin, two union leaders, a Democrat from New Jersey, a correspondent from Nation magazine as well as that publication's editor. Including the host, that's eight liberals to no conservatives. For those that point fingers at Fox News for being biased, at least their prime time programs consistently invite Democrats and left-leaning contributors on to give an opposing viewpoint. On Tuesday, the only conservatives to be found on “The Ed Show” were the people being eviscerated by the host and his guests. And MSNBC has the nerve to call this news.

Continue reading …
Sudan bombing ‘causing huge suffering’ in border state

UN accuses northern armed forces of indiscriminate military attacks against civilians in Southern Kordofan An air strike campaign in the Sudanese border state of Southern Kordofan is causing “huge suffering” to civilian populations and endangering humanitarian assistance in the region, the United Nations has said. The northern military has been fighting southern-aligned groups it describes as rebels in the oil state for more than a week, with clashes escalating to include artillery and aircraft. “Intensive bombing by SAF (the north’s Sudanese Armed Forces) in the past week is continuing in the surroundings of Kadugli and Kauda, where two jet fighters dropped 11 bombs this morning around 10.30, apparently targeting an airfield,” UN mission in Sudan (UNMIS) spokesman Kouider Zerrouk said on Tuesday. He said two bombs fell close to the perimeter of a UNMIS compound 150 metres from the airfield. “This bombing campaign is causing huge suffering to civilian populations and endangering humanitarian assistance,” he said. “We reiterate our call on the SAF, SPLA (Sudan People’s Liberation Army) and other armed groups who are involved in this conflict to immediately allow access to humanitarian agencies and stop indiscriminate military attacks against civilians and protect them in accordance with international law.” A northern army spokesman, Al-Sawarmi Khaled, denied that Khartoum’s military actions were killing civilians, saying fighting was only between the army and rebels. “There are not any victims from the civilian people.” Fighting in Southern Kordofan has raised tensions at a sensitive moment for Sudan, with the south set to declare independence in less than a month. The split has been complicated by a raft of unresolved issues, including where the border should be drawn and how to divide oil revenues. Southerners voted to secede in a January referendum which was promised in a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of north-south civil war. That conflict killed 2 million people. Also on Tuesday, the UN refugee agency urged Sudanese authorities to allow road and air access for aid workers trying to help thousands of people fleeing the fighting. Humanitarian flights have been denied permission to land in the state capital Kadugli for nearly a week and roadblocks manned by armed militiamen have hampered land access, the UN high commissioner for refugees said. “Insecurity means our operations are severely constrained and UNHCR is currently unable to reach a warehouse just 5km [3 miles] from the UN peacekeeping mission’s base in the city,” spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told a news briefing. Further underlining the deteriorating situation, the World Food Programme and the World Health Organisation said premises belonging to the two agencies in the area had been looted. Fleming said the UNHCR knew of 41,000 displaced people in the state, but it feared that many more were fleeing their homes, mostly children and women. Aid agencies had been able to deliver food and other help to only 6,000 people. “This is far below the number we would be able to reach if we had secure access,” she said. Sudan Africa United Nations guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Sudan bombing ‘causing huge suffering’ in border state

UN accuses northern armed forces of indiscriminate military attacks against civilians in Southern Kordofan An air strike campaign in the Sudanese border state of Southern Kordofan is causing “huge suffering” to civilian populations and endangering humanitarian assistance in the region, the United Nations has said. The northern military has been fighting southern-aligned groups it describes as rebels in the oil state for more than a week, with clashes escalating to include artillery and aircraft. “Intensive bombing by SAF (the north’s Sudanese Armed Forces) in the past week is continuing in the surroundings of Kadugli and Kauda, where two jet fighters dropped 11 bombs this morning around 10.30, apparently targeting an airfield,” UN mission in Sudan (UNMIS) spokesman Kouider Zerrouk said on Tuesday. He said two bombs fell close to the perimeter of a UNMIS compound 150 metres from the airfield. “This bombing campaign is causing huge suffering to civilian populations and endangering humanitarian assistance,” he said. “We reiterate our call on the SAF, SPLA (Sudan People’s Liberation Army) and other armed groups who are involved in this conflict to immediately allow access to humanitarian agencies and stop indiscriminate military attacks against civilians and protect them in accordance with international law.” A northern army spokesman, Al-Sawarmi Khaled, denied that Khartoum’s military actions were killing civilians, saying fighting was only between the army and rebels. “There are not any victims from the civilian people.” Fighting in Southern Kordofan has raised tensions at a sensitive moment for Sudan, with the south set to declare independence in less than a month. The split has been complicated by a raft of unresolved issues, including where the border should be drawn and how to divide oil revenues. Southerners voted to secede in a January referendum which was promised in a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of north-south civil war. That conflict killed 2 million people. Also on Tuesday, the UN refugee agency urged Sudanese authorities to allow road and air access for aid workers trying to help thousands of people fleeing the fighting. Humanitarian flights have been denied permission to land in the state capital Kadugli for nearly a week and roadblocks manned by armed militiamen have hampered land access, the UN high commissioner for refugees said. “Insecurity means our operations are severely constrained and UNHCR is currently unable to reach a warehouse just 5km [3 miles] from the UN peacekeeping mission’s base in the city,” spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told a news briefing. Further underlining the deteriorating situation, the World Food Programme and the World Health Organisation said premises belonging to the two agencies in the area had been looted. Fleming said the UNHCR knew of 41,000 displaced people in the state, but it feared that many more were fleeing their homes, mostly children and women. Aid agencies had been able to deliver food and other help to only 6,000 people. “This is far below the number we would be able to reach if we had secure access,” she said. Sudan Africa United Nations guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hugh Hefner announces jilting on Twitter

Playboy founder uses social media site to tell followers the wedding with Crystal Harris is off On Christmas Day 2010, Playboy founder Hugh Hefner took to Twitter to announce his engagement to Crystal Harris. “When I gave Crystal the ring, she burst into tears,” he enthused. “This is the happiest Christmas weekend in memory.” Six months on, and just days before the couple, aged 85 and 25 respectively, were to exchange vows, had less happy news for his 639,000 followers. “The wedding is off,” he tweeted on Tuesday afternoon. “Crystal has had a change of heart.” Harris, a former Playboy “Playmate of the Month”, also went online to deliver the new that she would not, after all, become Hefner’s third wife. “After much deep reflection and thought I have decided to end my engagement with Hef,” she wrote on her personal (and not-so-safe-for-work) website . “I have the utmost respect for Hef and wish him the best going forward. I hope the media will give each of us the privacy we deserve during this time.” Hefner, again on Twitter, denied suggestions there had been an angry argument: “The TMZ report that Crystal & I ‘had a nasty argument’, prompting her to call off the wedding, is untrue. There were no arguments.” As sympathy tweets flowed in from his followers, Hefner issued a number of other messages on the microblogging site. “The breakup is a heart breaker, but better now than after the marriage,” he later tweeted. And: “Since we’re not getting married on Saturday, I’ve scheduled a movie: Runaway Bride. Seems appropriate.” Hefner also retweeted, without comment, a remark by follower @LinzLuvs. It read: “Omg @CrystalHarris left @hughhefner the day her single came out on iTunes. Coincidence? I think not.” Celebrity United States Magazines Twitter Toby Manhire guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cenk Uygur: ‘Republican Vision Of Jesus–Tell Poor And Needy To Pound Sand’

I'm going to sit back and let our readers run with this one.

Continue reading …

Economic Ipecac

No Comment
Economic Ipecac

enlarge If you don’t know what ipecac is, it’s stuff that makes you vomit. These three news items came in one right after the other, and the combination had the same effect as a dose of the nasty stuff. First, the chart above, courtesy of Talking Points Memo . It illustrates the share of corporate profits workers aren’t getting. On the other hand, (and offered as the second item) the corporations are doing quite well , but of course, there are no jobs being created. Finally, we have US Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donahoe, who is arguably one of the most evil men to ever be in a position of power saying this to the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce: “Major corporations are sitting on $2 trillion,” Donohue said, adding that they are cautious about investing those dollars because of the uncertainty of new rules and regulations. “People are holding onto their money.” With the potential “explosion” of regulations, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own law firm that regularly sues the federal government in an effort to protect the nation’s business interests. What baloney. This notion that regulations are causing uncertainty is another Big Lie that gets told routinely to justify the efforts of corporations to sit on investment and expansion until they get their way. Turn blue, corporations, go ahead. But Donohue didn’t stop there. He took aim at the ultra-conservatives who think holding the debt ceiling hostage is a problem. However, I don’t view what he said as something to celebrate. It’s pretty sickening, actually. Yes, it will be raised, Donohue answered, mainly because the country can not afford to not pay its bills. To those newly-elected representatives who say they aren’t going to raise the debt ceiling and will shut down government, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own message: “We’ll get rid of you.” He then went on to praise U.S. House Speaker John Boehner for his Congressional leadership. “He’s growing into his shorts,” Donohue said. “He’s put on his big boy pants.” That message — the “we’ll get rid of you” threat — should turn the stomach of every American regardless of their political ideology. This notion that elected representatives must do the bidding of the US Chamber of Commerce and their contingents or they’ll be “offed” politically is the most thuggish, overt exercise of corporatism in politics I’ve ever seen.

Continue reading …

Economic Ipecac

No Comment
Economic Ipecac

enlarge If you don’t know what ipecac is, it’s stuff that makes you vomit. These three news items came in one right after the other, and the combination had the same effect as a dose of the nasty stuff. First, the chart above, courtesy of Talking Points Memo . It illustrates the share of corporate profits workers aren’t getting. On the other hand, (and offered as the second item) the corporations are doing quite well , but of course, there are no jobs being created. Finally, we have US Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donahoe, who is arguably one of the most evil men to ever be in a position of power saying this to the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce: “Major corporations are sitting on $2 trillion,” Donohue said, adding that they are cautious about investing those dollars because of the uncertainty of new rules and regulations. “People are holding onto their money.” With the potential “explosion” of regulations, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own law firm that regularly sues the federal government in an effort to protect the nation’s business interests. What baloney. This notion that regulations are causing uncertainty is another Big Lie that gets told routinely to justify the efforts of corporations to sit on investment and expansion until they get their way. Turn blue, corporations, go ahead. But Donohue didn’t stop there. He took aim at the ultra-conservatives who think holding the debt ceiling hostage is a problem. However, I don’t view what he said as something to celebrate. It’s pretty sickening, actually. Yes, it will be raised, Donohue answered, mainly because the country can not afford to not pay its bills. To those newly-elected representatives who say they aren’t going to raise the debt ceiling and will shut down government, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own message: “We’ll get rid of you.” He then went on to praise U.S. House Speaker John Boehner for his Congressional leadership. “He’s growing into his shorts,” Donohue said. “He’s put on his big boy pants.” That message — the “we’ll get rid of you” threat — should turn the stomach of every American regardless of their political ideology. This notion that elected representatives must do the bidding of the US Chamber of Commerce and their contingents or they’ll be “offed” politically is the most thuggish, overt exercise of corporatism in politics I’ve ever seen.

Continue reading …

Economic Ipecac

No Comment
Economic Ipecac

enlarge If you don’t know what ipecac is, it’s stuff that makes you vomit. These three news items came in one right after the other, and the combination had the same effect as a dose of the nasty stuff. First, the chart above, courtesy of Talking Points Memo . It illustrates the share of corporate profits workers aren’t getting. On the other hand, (and offered as the second item) the corporations are doing quite well , but of course, there are no jobs being created. Finally, we have US Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donahoe, who is arguably one of the most evil men to ever be in a position of power saying this to the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce: “Major corporations are sitting on $2 trillion,” Donohue said, adding that they are cautious about investing those dollars because of the uncertainty of new rules and regulations. “People are holding onto their money.” With the potential “explosion” of regulations, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own law firm that regularly sues the federal government in an effort to protect the nation’s business interests. What baloney. This notion that regulations are causing uncertainty is another Big Lie that gets told routinely to justify the efforts of corporations to sit on investment and expansion until they get their way. Turn blue, corporations, go ahead. But Donohue didn’t stop there. He took aim at the ultra-conservatives who think holding the debt ceiling hostage is a problem. However, I don’t view what he said as something to celebrate. It’s pretty sickening, actually. Yes, it will be raised, Donohue answered, mainly because the country can not afford to not pay its bills. To those newly-elected representatives who say they aren’t going to raise the debt ceiling and will shut down government, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own message: “We’ll get rid of you.” He then went on to praise U.S. House Speaker John Boehner for his Congressional leadership. “He’s growing into his shorts,” Donohue said. “He’s put on his big boy pants.” That message — the “we’ll get rid of you” threat — should turn the stomach of every American regardless of their political ideology. This notion that elected representatives must do the bidding of the US Chamber of Commerce and their contingents or they’ll be “offed” politically is the most thuggish, overt exercise of corporatism in politics I’ve ever seen.

Continue reading …
Afghanistan worst place in the world for women, but India in top five

Survey shows Democratic Republic of the Congo, Pakistan and Somalia also fail females, with rape, poverty and infanticide rife Targeted violence against female public officials, dismal healthcare and desperate poverty make Afghanistan the world’s most dangerous country in which to be born a woman, according to a global survey released on Wednesday. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Pakistan, India and Somalia feature in descending order after Afghanistan in the list of the five worst states, the poll among gender experts shows. The appearance of India, a country rapidly developing into an economic super-power, was unexpected. It is ranked as extremely hazardous because of the subcontinent’s high level of female infanticide and sex trafficking. Others were less surprised to be on the list. Informed about her country’s inclusion, Somalia’s women’s minister, Maryan Qasim, responded: “I thought Somalia would be first on the list, not fifth.” The survey has been compiled by the Thomson Reuters Foundation to mark the launch of a website, TrustLaw Woman , aimed at providing free legal advice for women’s groups around the world. High maternal mortality rates, limited access to doctors and a “near total lack of economic rights” render Afghanistan such a threat to its female inhabitants. “Continuing conflict, Nato airstrikes and cultural practices combine to make Afghanistan a very dangerous place for women,” said Antonella Notari, head of Women Change Makers , a group that supports women social entrepreneurs around the world. “Women who do attempt to speak out or take on public roles that challenge ingrained gender stereotypes of what is acceptable for women to do or not, such as working as policewomen or news broadcasters, are often intimidated or killed.” The “staggering levels of sexual violence” in the lawless east of the DRC account for its second place in the list. One recent US study claimed that more than 400,000 women are raped there each year. The UN has called Congo the rape capital of the world. “Rights activists say militia groups and soldiers target all ages, including girls as young as three and elderly women,” the survey reports, “They are gang raped, raped with bayonets and some have guns shot into their vaginas.” Pakistan is ranked third on the basis of cultural, tribal and religious practices harmful to women. “These include acid attacks, child and forced marriage and punishment or retribution by stoning or other physical abuse,” the poll finds. Divya Bajpai, reproductive health adviser at the International HIV/Aids Alliance , added: “Pakistan has some of the highest rates of dowry murder, so-called honour killings and early marriage.” According to Pakistan’s human rights commission, as many as 1,000 women and girls die in honour killings annually. India is the fourth most dangerous country. “India’s central bureau of investigation estimated that in 2009 about 90% of trafficking took place within the country and that there were some 3 million prostitutes, of which about 40% were children,” the survey found. Forced marriage and forced labour trafficking add to the dangers for women. “Up to 50 million girls are thought to be ‘missing’ over the past century due to female infanticide and foeticide,”, the UN population fund says, because parents prefer to have young boys rather than girls. Somalia, a state in political disintegration, suffers high levels of maternal mortality, rape, female genital mutilation and limited access to education and healthcare. Qasim added: “The most dangerous thing a woman in Somalia can do is to become pregnant. When a woman becomes pregnant her life is 50-50 because there is no antenatal care at all. There are no hospitals, no healthcare, no nothing. “Add to that the rape cases that happen on a daily basis, and female genital mutilation being done to every single girl in Somalia. Add to that famine and drought. Add to that the fighting [which means] you can die any minute, any day.” Monique Villa, the chief executive of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, said: “Hidden dangers – like a lack of education or terrible access to healthcare – are as deadly, if not more so, than physical dangers like rape and murder which usually grab the headlines. “In Afghanistan, for instance, women have a one in 11 chance of dying in childbirth. In the top five countries, basic human rights are systematically denied to women. “Empowering women tackles the very roots of poverty. In the developing world when a woman works, her children are better fed and better educated because they spend their money for their family.” The survey was based on responses from more than 200 aid professionals, academics, health workers, policymakers, journalists and development specialists chosen for their expertise in gender issues. Each country was also ranked in terms of six risk factors including: health, discrimination and lack of access to resources, cultural and religious practices, sexual violence, human trafficking and conflict-related violence. In terms of individual risk categories, Afghanistan was deemed to be the most dangerous for health, economic/discrimination and non-sexual violence; the Congo is most plagued by rape and sexual violence; and India has most problems with trafficking. “You have to look at all the dangers to women, all the risks women and girls face,” said Elisabeth Roesch, who works on gender-based violence for the International Rescue Committee in Washington. “If a woman can’t access healthcare because her healthcare isn’t prioritised, that can be a very dangerous situation as well.” The TrustLaw website has been in existence for some time, linking up local NGOs and social entrepreneurs with established law firms who are prepared to offer legal advice on a pro-bono basis. The groups are vetted by Transparency International. More than 450 law firms are already involved including some from China. Among those that have recently benefited have been the charity Riders for Health , which delivers medicine to remote villages, and reviewed its contracts in Nigeria. Gender Afghanistan Democratic Republic of the Congo Pakistan India Somalia Human rights Rape Health Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Ah, the banksters just never quit giving us fuel for our fires, do they? In today’s news, we have this gem, courtesy of the Huffington Post : The bank withheld key documents and data, prevented investigators from interviewing bank employees or asking certain questions, and was slow to provide information, according to a June 1 declaration by William W. Nixon, a fraud examiner and assistant regional inspector general for audit for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development inspector general’s office. Due to Bank of America’s “reluctance,” Nixon resorted to asking the Justice Department to issue so-called civil investigative demands last December to compel testimony, a “less effective” means of carrying out its investigation, Nixon said. His office can’t compel testimony on its own. Bank of America, the largest handler of home loans in the U.S., threw up roadblocks to the investigation, Nixon said, like preventing his team from performing a “walkthrough” of the bank’s documents unit. The bank also failed to fully comply with subpoenas issued by Nixon’s team. HUD’s internal watchdog issued two subpoenas requesting documents and information, and what was returned was incomplete, had conflicting information, and in some cases, the bank provided excerpts of documents rather than the complete record. Here’s an example of what they were looking for: Federal investigators found one bank employee who signed more than 75,000 foreclosure documents over the two-year period. If the employee worked every day during those two years, that amounts to about 103 documents signed per day, or one every five minutes. The next time you hear someone blaming Fannie and Freddie for the mortgage meltdown, please supply this article to them and ask them what part they think Bank of America and its acquired puppet Countrywide played in the whole stinking mess.

Continue reading …