Oh, it does my heart good to watch Baby Paul schooled in such a direct fashion. This little “debate” on food programs for seniors highlights the Randian “screw you, I’ve got mine” attitude so well. This video is from a Senate hearing on the Older Americans Act. Here are some highlights: FRANKEN: Make no mistake, the Older Americans Act saves money. It allows seniors to stay in their homes, who wouldn’t otherwise be able to stay in their homes. PAUL: It’s curious that only in Washington DC can you spend two billion dollars and claim that you’re saving money. Here’s a thought. Perhaps the two billion dollars we spend on OAA, if we subsumed that into another program and didn’t spend it, that might be saving money. So, let me see if I have this right. Baby Paul is saying that by merging OAA with another program but not funding it, there would be savings to the government. Yes, that’s what he’s saying. Sanders and Franken have an answer for him. SANDERS: Senator Paul has suggested that only in Washington can people believe that spending money actually saves money. And I think that is the kind of philosophy which results in us spending almost twice as much per person on health care as any other country on earth, because we have millions and millions of Americans who can’t get to a doctor on time. Some of them die, some of them become very, very ill. They end up in the emergency room, they end up in the hospital at great cost rather than making sure they have access to a doctor. Maybe it’s the same reason why we have more people in jail than any other country on earth including China, tied to the fact that we have the highest poverty rate among children than any other major country on earth. So the point is, and I think we have a bit of a difference here, I believe — I think Senator Franken has spoken to the fact — that prevention, keeping people healthy, taking care of their needs at home does actually save money. And that if you deny those resources, if you leave a senior citizen home today, alone, isolated, confused about medicine, not getting the nutrition they need, you know what happens to that person? That person collapses, that person ends up in an emergency room, that person ends up in a nursing home, at much greater cost to the system. FRANKEN: Here’s my very precise question. Does the Older Americans Act save taxpayers money by allowing seniors to stay in their homes as opposed to going to nursing homes? MS. GREENLEE: Yes, Senator. FRANKEN: Thank you. SANDERS: Senator Paul wanted to make another comment. PAUL: I appreciate the great and I think very collegial discussion, and we do have different opinions. Some of us believe more in the ability of government to cure problems and some of us believe more in the ability of private charity to cure these problems. I guess what I still find curious though is that if we are saving money with the two billion dollars we spend, perhaps we should give you 20 billion. Is there a limit? Where would we get to, how much money should we give you to save money? So if we spend federal money to save money where is the limit? I think we could reach a point of absurdity. Thank you. FRANKEN: I think you just did. That Baby Paul mind-bent wandering down stupidity lane there at the end is mind-boggling, isn’t it? Start with the old “private charity” nonsense. Private charities do not, have not, and can not handle the need. It’s that simple. It’s ridiculous to make this argument at all. And the rest of it is pure nonsense, which Franken handled quite nicely. Steve Benen : Understanding this just requires a little bit of thought. If we cut spending on volcano monitoring and tsunami warnings, we save a little money on maintenance, but pay a lot of money on damage repairs after disaster strikes. If we cut spending on food safety, we save a little money on inspection, but pay a lot of money on health care costs when consumers get sick. If we cut spending for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as Republicans are desperate to do, we save a little money on enforcement, but pay a lot of money to clean up financial catastrophes. For every dollar the IRS spends on audits, liens, and property seizures, the government brings in more than $10. If we spend less on IRS enforcement, as Republicans demand, it costs us more. Is this really that confusing? Yes, evidently it is that confusing to Baby Paul, who has been raised on the bitter taste of human selfishness rather than human kindness. None of this is new, and most of you reading already know how bent this guy is when it comes to social programs. But it still merits attention, if only to demonstrate yet again how insanely selfish the Ayn Rand set is when it comes to smart spending. I wonder if Baby Paul has maintenance done on his car? Would he consider that to be wasteful spending, even though it extends the life of his car and prevents major breakdowns? But of course, auto maintenance isn’t something charity provides. It’s business. So there’s that. In Rand Paul’s weird, skewed universe, he only lives in a place where he is forever exempt from need, want or hunger and therefore has no compassion for those who do.
Continue reading …40 people killed and 82 injured after four explosions hit a mosque, market places and a police patrol Four bombs have exploded in Baghdad, killing at least 40 people in the worst violence the capital has seen in months, Iraqi officials said. An American civilian aid specialist working to improve education in Iraq was killed in a separate attack. The violence underscores the fragile nature of the security gains in Iraq at a time when American forces are preparing to withdraw by the end of this year. The first three bombs went off in quick succession in a southwestern Baghdad neighbourhood shortly after 7pm local time on Thursday. One targeted a Shiite mosque, another exploded just outside a popular market, while the third went off inside the market where people were doing their evening shopping ahead of the Muslim weekend, Iraqi police officials said. The officials said 34 people died and 82 others were injured in the three blasts. An official from Baghdad’s Yarmouk hospital confirmed the casualty figures. About an hour later, a parked car bomb targeting a police patrol killed six people, including one policeman and five bystanders in a different neighbourhood in southwestern Baghdad, said hospital officials. There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but Sunni extremists such as al-Qaida in Iraq have been known to target Shiite mosques and Iraqi security forces. It was the worst attack in the capital since a parked car bomb exploded in a northern Baghdad in January, killing 48 people. The American civilian killed earlier Thursday was named as Dr Stephen Everhart.A US state department spokeswoman said: “Dr Everhart was an American citizen who was working in Iraq for an implementing partner of the United States Agency for International Development’s Mission in Iraq. He was killed while working on a project to introduce a new business curriculum to a Baghdad university in a programme supported by the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education. “We are saddened by this tragedy and extend our thoughts and prayers to Dr Everhart’s family and loved ones, and to the three other injured victims and their families,” she said. Iraq Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Footage uploaded to YouTube indicates that sympathy more than passion was the motivation behind the famous kiss Fresh video footage appearing to show Vancouver’s famous riot couple seems to end speculation that the picture was faked, and indicates that sympathy more than passion was the motivation behind the kiss that was captured on camera . The footage, uploaded to YouTube, seems to show Australian Scott Jones comforting his girlfriend, Alex Thomas, after she was knocked to the ground by an officer’s riot shield. The photo of the couple, taken by photographer Richard Lam, became a global sensation and was taken as Lam was documenting the riot that began after the hometown Canucks lost ice hockey’s Stanley Cup to the Boston Bruins . The picture became an internet sensation and fuelled speculation that the embrace was staged. The video shows the crowd retreating as the couple find themselves caught in the path of two riot police. Both officers collide with the pair with their shields, knocking them to the ground. The couple appear to be holding up their arms up in defence. The camera moves on, returning to show the man comforting the distraught woman. Jones and Thomas have been inundated with offers to describe the events surrounding the famous kiss and had said they did not want the “extra stress” of media appointments. But they are now believed to have hired celebrity publicist Markson Sparks PR. Jones is an aspiring comedian. “I think for Scott, it’s a tremendous opportunity for him to springboard his acting and standup comedy,” Markson told the Toronto Star . “Overseas people know more about that photo than the Stanley Cup.” He said the couple’s global exposure could be worth a potential $10m. Canada Photography Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Pair, who had been under surveillance since someone they tried to recruit alerted FBI, charged with conspiracy to murder Two men have been arrested for allegedly plotting to attack a military recruiting centre in Seattle with machine guns and grenades, the US justice department has said. Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif, also known as Joseph Anthony Davis, 33, of Seattle, and Walli Mujahidh, 32, also known as Frederick Domingue Jr, of Los Angeles, are charged with conspiracy to murder. They had been under surveillance since someone they tried to recruit alerted the FBI, according to an affidavit. The accused were apparently recorded on video discussing their plan. Law enforcement agents then intercepted Abdul-Latif and Mujahidh’s arms transactions and rendered their weapons inoperable. The defendants had initially planned an attack on Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State, but later changed targets. The cooperating individual was told that the attack was planned in retaliation for alleged crimes by US soldiers in Afghanistan, according to an FBI affidavit filed on Thursday. The affidavit said: “Abdul-Latif explained that, in his view, murdering American soldiers was justifiable.” US attorney Jenny Durkan said: “The complaint alleges these men intended to carry out a deadly attack against our military where they should be most safe, here at home.” Todd Hinnen, acting assistant attorney general for national security, said the two men were “driven by a violent, extreme ideology” which had led them to plot the murder of those enlisting in the US armed forces. He added: “This is one of a number of recent plots targeting our military here at home.” Abdul-Latif and Mujahidh are charged with conspiracy to murder officers and employees of the United States, conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, and possession of firearms in furtherance of crimes of violence. Abdul-Latif is also charged with two counts of illegal possession of firearms. Durkan said: “This is a sobering reminder of our need to be vigilant and that our first line of defence is the people who live in our community. We were able to disrupt the plot because someone stepped forward and reported it to authorities.” If convicted, the two could face up to life in prison. FBI United States Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sure looks like it, but decide for yourself. Whitey Bulger is the alleged crime boss arrested Wednesday by FBI agents in Santa Monica, Calif., with his longtime girlfriend Catherine Greig. The basis for the Jack Nicholson character in “The Departed,” Bulger is suspected of involvement in at least 19 murders and myriad other crimes. Until last month, only one other figure on the FBI's most wanted list was considered more dangerous — Osama bin Laden.
Continue reading …EU leaders accepted David Cameron’s argument that the cost should be borne by those using the single currency European leaders agreed to launch a fresh bailout of Greece subject to parliamentary passage of an austerity package next week. Britain is to be spared from taking part in the rescue after leaders accepted David Cameron’s argument that the bailout, expected to total up to €120bn (£107bn) should be borne by the other 16 countries using the single currency. The Brussels summit of the EU’s heads of government was scheduled to focus on the European economy, immigration policy and upheavals in the Middle East, but was overshadowed by the sovereign debt crisis in Greece, which is perceived to be on the brink of a meltdown that might trigger a fresh international banking crisis. A statement said that the draconian package of €28bn in spending cuts and tax rises plus a €50bn privatisation programme “must be finalised as a matter of urgency in the coming days” by Greece to qualify for the new bailout. The rescue would be provided by Greece’s “euro partners and the International Monetary Fund”, meaning that Britain would be exempted from the European part of the package. In Prague , Cameron reiterated his refusal to take part in the latest Greek bailout except through Britain’s contributions to the IMF. Germany had been insisting that the bailout should be partly funded by all 27 EU members, but backed off. “It would have been too divisive while not supplying very much money, so there was no point making an issue of it,” said a European commission official. “It’s not part of the package,” said Herman Van Rompuy, the European council president who chaired the summit, of the fund to which the entire EU contributes. “This is the right outcome for the British taxpayer,” said a Downing Street source. Washington and the IMF have been piling the pressure on EU leaders to deal decisively with the Greek emergency. While George Papandreou, the Greek prime minister, was fighting for his political life and with Greece’s fate in the balance, the opposition leader, Antonis Samaris, also came under pressure from EU leaders to line up behind his political foes for the sake of the nation. At a meeting of European centre right leaders in Brussels before the summit, Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel, and others pressed Samaris to drop his opposition to Papandreou and to support the austerity package in parliament. Samaris has sworn his opposition and his New Democracy party all voted against Papandreou in a vote of confidence early on Wednesday morning. The EU, the IMF, and the European commission all say that the Greek austerity package has to be carried by the broadest possible majority next week. In July and August, the Greek government has to redeem bonds to the tune of €9.4bn. Without €12bn from the eurozone and the IMF – the fifth tranche of last year’s 110 billion bailout – by mid-July, Greece will be broke, sparking a sovereign default and a bigger international crisis. The Greek finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos, announced details of the austerity measures, which include lowering the minimum threshold for income tax to €8,000 a year from its current level of €12,000. Greece will also levy a one-off solidarity tax ranging from 1-5% depending on income, increase tax on heating fuel, and impose a minimum tax on the self-employed, who are widely regarded as some of the country’s most flagrant tax evaders. To try to ease Greece’s plight, José Manuel Barroso, the European commission president, pleaded with EU governments to agree to fast-track €1bn from the EU budget to Greece for poverty and unemployment relief. Greece Europe European Union David Cameron Foreign policy Economic policy Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …British study finds two-month extreme diet can cure type 2 diabetes and overturns assumptions about ‘lifelong’ condition People who have had obesity-related type 2 diabetes for years have been cured, at least temporarily, by keeping to an extreme, low-calorie, diet for two months, scientists report today. The discovery, reported by scientists at Newcastle University, overturns previous assumptions about type 2 diabetes, which was thought to be a lifelong illness. In the UK about two and a half million people have been diagnosed with diabetes, the large majority with type 2, and numbers are rising across much of the world. The condition has to be controlled with drugs and eventually insulin injections. It can cause blindness and end in foot amputation, as well as shortening life. The results of the Newcastle investigation, though the study was small, demonstrated that full recovery was possible, not through drugs but through diet. Eleven people with diabetes took part in the study, which was funded by Diabetes UK. They had to slash their food intake to just 600 calories a day for two months. But three months later seven of the 11 were free of diabetes. “To have people free of diabetes after years with the condition is remarkable – and all because of an eight-week diet,” said Roy Taylor, professor at Newcastle University, who led the study. “This is a radical change in understanding type 2 diabetes. It will change how we can explain it to people newly diagnosed with the condition. While it has long been believed that someone with type 2 diabetes will always have the disease, and that it will steadily get worse, we have shown that we can reverse the condition.” Type 2 diabetes, which used to be known as adult onset, is caused by too much glucose in the blood. It is strongly linked to obesity, unlike type 1, which usually develops in children whose bodies are unable to make the hormone insulin to convert glucose from food into energy. They need daily insulin injections. The research, presented today at the American Diabetes Association conference, shows that an extremely low-calorie diet, consisting of diet drinks and non-starchy vegetables, prompts the body to remove the fat clogging the pancreas and preventing it from making insulin. The volunteers were closely supervised by a medical team and matched with the same number of volunteers with diabetes who did not get the special diet. After just one week into the study, the pre-breakfast blood sugar levels of the study group had returned to normal. And MRI scans showed that the fat levels in the pancreas had returned to normal. The pancreas regained its ability to make insulin. After the eight-week diet the volunteers returned to normal eating but had advice on healthy foods and portion size. Ten of the group were retested and seven had stayed free of diabetes. Taylor, the director of the Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre, had the idea for the study after it was shown that diabetes was reversed in people who had undergone stomach stapling or other forms of bariatric surgery because of obesity. “What was remarkable was that the diabetes went away over the course of one week. It was widely believed the operation itself had done something, [that] the hormones in the gut were thought to be the cause. That is almost universally believed.” Taylor thought the massive drop in calorie intake after surgery could be responsible and to test this hypothesis set up the study, which included MRI scans of the pancreas to look at any changes in the fatty deposits. “We believe this shows that type 2 diabetes is all about energy balance in the body,” said Taylor. “If you are eating more than you burn, then the excess is stored in the liver and pancreas as fat, which can lead to type 2 diabetes in some people. What we need to examine further is why some people are more susceptible to developing diabetes than others.” He warned that only a minority of people, perhaps 5% or 10%, would be able to stick to the harsh diet necessary to get rid of diabetes. But even that, he said, would dramatically improve the health of many people and save the NHS millions. Iain Frame, director of research at Diabetes UK, said people should not embark on such a diet without a doctor’s approval and help. “We welcome the results of this research because it shows that type 2 diabetes can be reversed, on a par with successful surgery without the side effects. “However, this diet is not an easy fix and Diabetes UK strongly recommends that such a drastic diet should only be undertaken under medical supervision. Despite [it] being a very small trial, we look forward to future results, particularly to see whether the reversal remains long term.” Gordon Parmley, 67, of Stocksfield, Newcastle upon Tyne, a trial participant, said he first noticed something was wrong when his vision went “fuzzy” and he had trouble focusing while playing golf. He had been on medication since being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes six years ago. He said: “When my doctor mentioned the trial I thought I’d give it a go, as it might help me and other diabetics. I came off my tablets and had three diet shakes a day and some salad or vegetables, but it was very, very, difficult and I’m not sure I’d have done it without the support of my wife, who went on a diet alongside me. ” At first the hunger was quite severe and I had to distract myself with something else – walking the dog, playing golf, or doing anything to occupy myself and take my mind off food. But I lost an astounding amount of weight in a short space of time. “At the end of the trial I was told my insulin levels were normal, and after six years I no longer needed my diabetes tablets. Still today, 18 months on, I don’t take them. “It’s astonishing really that a diet – hard as it was – could change my health so drastically. After six years of having diabetes I can tell the difference. I feel better, even walking round the golf course is easier.” Diabetes Health Health policy Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …We already covered BNF and Bernie Sanders great new video about the Koch Brothers that’s like a RWNM 101 primer. We write about it often enough on C&L, but it never hurts to continue the discussion of its influence on the media and the people. Readers new into politics may not understand why Conservative messaging is so powerful. If you want to know how this all began—check out this article about The Powell Memo, which was authored in 1971. It set the stage for everything we see today. In 1971, Lewis F. Powell, then a corporate lawyer and member of the boards of 11 corporations, wrote a memo to his friend Eugene Sydnor, Jr., the Director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The memorandum was dated August 23, 1971, two months prior to Powell’s nomination by President Nixon to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Powell Memo did not become available to the public until long after his confirmation to the Court. It was leaked to Jack Anderson, a liberal syndicated columnist, who stirred interest in the document when he cited it as reason to doubt Powell’s legal objectivity. Anderson cautioned that Powell “might use his position on the Supreme Court to put his ideas into practice…in behalf of business interests.” Though Powell’s memo was not the sole influence, the Chamber and corporate activists took his advice to heart and began building a powerful array of institutions designed to shift public attitudes and beliefs over the course of years and decades. The memo influenced or inspired the creation of the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the Cato Institute, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Accuracy in Academe, and other powerful organizations. Their long-term focus began paying off handsomely in the 1980s, in coordination with the Reagan Administration’s “hands-off business” philosophy. Most notable about these institutions was their focus on education, shifting values, and movement-building – a focus we share, though usually with contrasting goals…. read the whole thing. There’s more here.
Continue reading …Program goes live at 8:15 pm EDT/5:15 pm PDT It’s difficult to stay optimistic as a liberal. Between being drowned out by right wing media, ignored by the mainstream Democratic Party and dodging hippie punches left and right, it’s easy to sink into a sense of hopelessness and powerlessness. But that’s what all those opposing forces want you to believe. Van Jones has been studying the various effectiveness of political parties, movements and campaigns, and he thinks it’s time for liberals and progressives to come together to use the most successful strategies to make our voice not only heard, but listened to . Now, these [various liberal groups] are massive constituencies and DC has nothing to say to any of them. We think that it is time to give them a vehicle, and a voice, to speak and to be heard in the organizations that are carrying the fight for them, to not just be left to fight alone. But now, most of the people in those categories are fighting and they’re fighting every day. But they’re fighting alone, and even the organizations that are fighting for them are fighting alone. We think that the simple act of creating a common banner for these groups and for these constituencies to begin to coalesce under could gel to change the conversation. In addition to this roll out, house meetings are taking place all over the country, training people to use these techniques, social networking tools and strategies to gain momentum for a Rebuild the Dream summit in DC. As much as I derided them, I cannot deny the effectiveness of the tea party to gain and hold the attention of elected officials. But here’s the dirty secret that both the complacent Democrats and the self-important tea party caucus doesn’t want the rest of us to know: we outnumber them. At their most effective, the tea party only gathered 150,000 people one single time for a rally in DC. Hell, Wisconsin STILL gets that many protesters at the capitol building months later. But we segregate ourselves into specialized groups and refuse to coordinate our efforts, thus diminishing our strength and effectiveness. By rallying around the single banner that every American deserves the right to realize the American Dream, we can work together to show Washington DC that we are a force that can be reckoned with.
Continue reading …