The eurozone’s debt crisis poses the biggest threat to Britain’s financial stability and banks must come clean on their full exposure, the financial policy committee says The eurozone’s debt crisis poses the biggest threat to Britain’s financial stability and banks must come clean on their full exposure, Britain’s new risk watchdog said on Friday. “Sovereign and banking strains are the most material and immediate threat,” the financial policy committee said in its inaugural report . The watchdog, which is chaired by Bank of England governor Mervyn King, turned up the heat on banks to use strong profits to boost capital cushions, but stopped short of specifying a figure. It also warned authorities needed to keep a closer eye on the explosion of opaque instruments, such as exchange traded funds, which banks are increasingly using to raise funds. The report came as EU leaders scramble to avert a Greek debt default that would send shockwaves through international markets. “Market concerns remain over fiscal positions in a number of euro area countries and the potential for contagion to banking systems,” the FPC said. “Any associated disruption to bank funding markets could spill over to UK banks.” Its key recommendations include: • Improved disclosure of sovereign and banking sector debt exposure by major banks on a permanent basis. • Requiring smaller banks, not part of current EU stress tests, to compile data on sovereign and banking debt exposure. • Ensuring banks use strong profits to build up capital cushions before new Basel III rules come in. • Asking the Financial Services Authority to report back to the committee by the fourth quarter on whether banks are adequately building up capital buffers. • Better monitoring of opaque funding structures such as collateral swaps or similar transactions used by exchange-traded funds. • Improved data from banks on forebearance in household and corporate sector. Financial policy committee Financial crisis Banking Financial sector Bank of England Economics Economic policy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Hacker known as The Jester claims to have taken the LulzSec website offline on Friday morning The website of the notorious hacking collective LulzSec was temporarily crippled on Friday morning after an apparent retribution attack by an ex-military hacker. The lone-wolf operator, known as the Jester, claimed to have downed the LulzSec website “for the lulz” and exposed its shadowy leader in a Twitter message on Friday. The main LulzSec website was down for a short time on Friday morning but resurfaced shortly after. The Jester, notorious in the online hacking community, has waged a long-running battle with senior members of Anonymous and its splinter group LulzSec. Significantly, the Jester also posted what appears to be an attempt to out the founder and leader of LulzSec, a long-term hacker known as Sabu. The investigation pieces together a trail of information gathered from public and private social networks and concludes the following: Name(s): Xavier Kaotico, Xavier de Leon Email: [redacted by the Guardian] Age: 30 as of 2011-06-21 Location: Possibly New York City, NY (has lived there) Websites: sabu.net, pure-elite.org, confinement.org Profession: Independent IT consultant Interests: Python programming, Linux, network security, exploit development Attempts to name-and-shame each other has become a feature of the online hacking community. The Jester is one of the most closely-guarded activists, with numerous attempts to reveal his real-life identity by Anonymous members apparently falling short. Most have a number of online sobriquets which change hands almost as often as they change targets. Overnight, LulzSec claimed to have hacked into the website and database of the Arizona Department of Public Safety and released a tranche of allegedly confidential information. The group also denied claims it was behind an attack on servers used by the Sun: Update: Another lone-wolf hacker, Oneiroi, is claiming credit for crippling LulzSec’s website. Writing on his blog , Oneiroi says: “I’m afraid I’m unable to post a mission statement at this time. I’d like to let the public know that phase one of OPERATION SUPERNOVA has been successful. Lulzsecurity.com is Tango down at this time. The attack will stop by Midnight PST. Also, Cloudflare is not my target. Please don’t argue that lulzsec is up. Cloudflare creates a backup of the website. It’s doing its job. I want to make it bloody clear that Cloudflare isn’t my target.” LulzSec Hacking Internet Anonymous Computing Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …He divides audiences like no other comedian, his fans hanging on every word of his rambling monologues, his critics raging at the lack of laughs. Stewart Lee explains his pleasure at being hated – and why he doesn’t do ‘jokes’ Even Stewart Lee’s son doesn’t think he is funny. Ask him what his parents do for a living, says Lee, and he’ll say, “Mummy is funny,” of his mother, the comedian Bridget Christie , “but Daddy just talks.” At one show last year, the then three-year-old watched his father on stage from the wings and uttered the devastating observation: “Nobody is laughing.” “It’s funny,” says Lee, “that a child’s perception of it is that I’m failing, rather like a lot of reviewers.” No other comedian seems to polarise an audience as much as Lee. Despite achieving a revered status among his peers and fans, there must be many more people who can’t understand what the fuss is about. I meet Lee at an interesting point in his career. The second series of his BBC2 television show Stewart Lee’s Comedy Vehicle finished this month to wide critical acclaim, and decent viewing figures. A long summer of live dates stretches out in front of him. The TV deal means he is financially stable for the first time in his life (he is 43), which meant he was able to get a mortgage on a house and move his family out of their one-bedroom flat. And the barmaid in the pub in north London where we meet has just recognised him from the telly, even though he has been coming here for more than 10 years. I’m wary of his joke from his show – his wish to get rid of the public and just have “me and broadsheet journalists in a self-congratulatory loop” – but in person he is less self-satisfied than he appears on stage, and less commanding. He is fuzzy around the edges, his hair a greying tangle, sitting round-shouldered in the corner, only occasionally making eye contact. He is more cheerful too, prone to laughing in a great wheeze, sometimes at the end of sentences where, as far as I can tell, he hasn’t actually said anything funny. But it’s a joyful thing, his laugh – his cheeks swell and he suddenly looks like a child – so I laugh along too. This is a very Lee thing: you laugh even when you’re not entirely sure why. In How I Escaped My Certain Fate , the book about his standup that came out last year, Lee vowed he would eventually get rid of all the “jokes” (he is often accused of not having any anyway) “in favour of grinding repetition, embarrassing silences and passive-aggressive monotony.” That was a joke. I think. His act can be willfully obtuse and rambling. People hang on his every word because they have to – zone out for a minute, and you will find his monologues impenetrable. He gets a clear thrill from alienating an audience, then trying to win them back. Those who love him do so with a passion. But it’s a fairly small number. The rest? “Fuck ‘em,” he says in one show, “it’s not for them.” How close is Lee’s stage persona to life? “It’s similar in lots of ways,” he says, “but the politics and the morality is exaggerated, he’s more like the absolutist I was as a teenager. He’s different enough that I’m aware of getting fed up of him when I’m doing the same show for a long time or going through a phase of writing. I’m sick of what he thinks, how he talks, how pleased with himself he is.” Lee seems happier, less sneery and murderously misanthropic. “I am, absolutely. On stage I look at the worst of everything and feel slighted. But the 2007 show, there was a bit of a watershed moment – it was only three months after our son had been born and I already felt like it was going to be difficult to maintain that degree of cynicism because having kids [he also has a five-month-old] forces a degree of optimism on you. Not only does it make you happy, you have to hope that everything will be all right. Since then I think the shows have been more upbeat, or they’re about a frustration that things aren’t better, rather than a pleasure at it.” He claims to be amazed that he is making a living from what he does. “I think what I do is borderline art. Most people who do borderline art have to have other jobs, so I’m very grateful.” I check for a flicker of irony at this declaration and there is none. But if art makes you see something differently, is produced with integrity for its own sake (by someone who doesn’t do, say, insurance adverts for cash), requires your attention and engagement, then maybe he is right. “I want to get better at what I do,” says Lee, “and there will inevitably be casualties along the way where it’s too much for people or it’s too boring. But if I can do that and still make a living, it’s a luxurious position.” The BBC dragged its feet before recommissioning the second series, and it was put on at a later 11.20pm slot on a Wednesday night, following Newsnight, but still felt buried. Did that feel like an insult? “No, I preferred it because it meant there weren’t so many people breathing down my neck about content and style,” he says. “It meant it wouldn’t have to compete against . . .” – he pauses, as if to brace himself against the bitter taste of the word – ” . . . entertainment.” In the first episode, Lee tells his audience: “They wanted me to put jokes in. It was a condition of this being recommissioned.” Was that . . . a joke? “It was, but I wanted to get that out of the way. You can’t really criticise someone for something they don’t want to do – there are loads of people doing jokes, go and watch them.” This is often the biggest criticism of Lee – that he’s just not funny. Does he understand why some people think that? “Yeah, absolutely. If you trust it and go with it, you find it funny. If you don’t, it becomes annoying and unbearable. In 2007 I was put on in Edinburgh in this big tent in the middle of town where the funny people are on. I had a sense that at weekends there were these people who had got babysitters and were coming out and they saw this strange, problematic act and they were often annoyed and disappointed. I didn’t take any pleasure in that.” He says he now goes out of his way to make it clear how terrible some people think he is by using quotes on promotional material, such as “the worst comedian in Britain, as funny as bubonic plague” (the Sun), not as self-deprecation but genuinely to put people off. “I got a good one from Toby Young – ‘I have always thought that Stewart Lee’s comedy is the opposite of what comedy should be.’” He laughs. “In a way, that’s good because it keeps people out who would rather see something else.” Born in Shropshire but adopted as a baby, Lee was brought up by his mother in Solihull after his parents split up when he was four. He won a scholarship to the local public school, his mother doing evening jobs to make up the shortfall in fees, before getting a place at Oxford. “It was an opportunity of the kind she never had,” he writes in How I Escaped My Certain Fate, “only to blow it outta my ass by becoming a standup comedian.” He notes, movingly, that though he has always talked about how disappointed she must be by his career (she thought he should be working on the cruises by now like her favourite comedian, Tom O’Connor), she had kept a scrapbook of his press cuttings all along. In 1990, Lee won the Hackney Empire’s New Act of the Year Award, and for the rest of the decade wrote and performed with his friend Richard Herring . Then came a downward spiral: their television shows were cancelled, his live tour didn’t go well, and Lee decided to abandon standup in 2001. Instead, he co-wrote and directed Jerry Springer: the Opera , which although a critical and commercial hit and garlanded with awards, became better known for the blasphemy charge a fundamental Christian organisation tried to bring against the BBC for showing it . Around the same time, Lee had been treated in hospital for diverticulitis , a stomach disorder, and spent several months on painkillers, wondering what to do with himself. So he returned to the standup circuit and, burned by his one dalliance with a mass audience, decided he would cultivate a small but loyal audience. The inevitable problem with such a niche act, though, is that you alienate those who don’t like it and you get accused of being elitist and smug. In his live shows, he points out, there is more time to develop his shambolic stage persona, to denigrate himself, so the condescension is counterbalanced. “In the second series we had more room to breathe so we were allowed to hold on to things like people walking out or stuff not really working. It was great.” But now the danger is the low-status loser he has carefully cultivated is starting to look disingenuous in light of his success. Why is there so much vitriol aimed at Lee and his work? When he was writing his book, he looked at what people were saying about him online, “and I found all this stuff, people hating me.” “I saw him at a gig once, and even offstage he was exuding an aura of creepy molesty smugness” is one comment left on a messageboard; “One man I would love to beat with a shit-covered cricket bat” is another. “I found a lot of it quite funny. I’ve now got a 35,000-word document of quotes from people who hate me, a lot from the Guardian comment threads. Mostly I’ve managed to get myself into the mindset where the criticism is quite affirming.” He wanted to publish the whole thing as a book for charity but his editor suggested making it the appendix of another book. I sense his disappointment at this. “There are some really great ones,” he says. But what can that do to a person, wading through so much bile? “I do need to draw a line under it,” he says. “It is sort of funny, but . . . ” Now it’s a bit too self-absorbed? “Just a bit boring really. I’ve had most combinations of words now. Though I had this one – ‘I hate Stewart Lee, he’s like Ian Huntley to me.’ That’s a bit much, isn’t it?” He cackles. The Jerry Springer fuss, he says, “is probably why I find [internet comments] funny. My worry about the Christian right thing was not so much the criticism of the show – although it was a shame to see it misrepresented – but that they were able to mobilise to the point where it affected my ability to make a living. I have kids now, and I don’t want to have worked on something for years and then not to be paid for it, which is what happened with Jerry Springer. We’d set up a tour that would have offset some debts and then it would be like the cliff face crumbling under you because [religious activists] would get the local councils to pull the theatres. I was lucky that I’d had a flat with my ex-fiancee in the mid-90s and when we split up, I said, ‘If you ever sell it, just give me what I put in”, and she did. That got me through the Jerry Springer period. That’s all I worry about now with criticism – will it affect me professionally?” Does he ever look at millionaire comedians such as Michael McIntyre – whom Lee accused of spoonfeeding his fans “warm diarrhoea” – and feel the tiniest bit jealous? “Not really. I wouldn’t want that level of recognition. It’s quite difficult as a comic if you’re that famous to know whether people are laughing at you or whether they’re just excited about seeing someone famous in a football stadium. It’s hard to go badly under those circumstances, and going badly is a big part of what I do. I’m no good at the things they do – I can’t do panel shows, I don’t like being interviewed as a personality, I wouldn’t want to have to sit in the green room on Jonathan Ross and make small talk with Rihanna. I would find it awkward and embarrassing.” He has met McIntyre: “I shook his hand, wished him well. I saw Russell Howard before the stuff I did about him had been out [Lee marvelled at Howard's reported £4m television deal, comparing it unfavourably with the money he raised for Sport Relief] and I said: ‘It’s not supposed to be about you, it’s about this bigger idea of what we as individuals should be doing for charity.’ I got the apology in in advance. It was a bit awkward. But in that, I’m in character as someone who feels they should get more acclaim for doing loads of unpaid benefit gigs so it sort of goes both ways. Though I do feel that.” He laughs. “I thought taking the piss out of it on television would stem the requests, but it’s actually gone up.” He is doing one later. Then there’s the current work-in-progress live dates in preparation for a new show later this year, and he is waiting to hear if there will be a third TV series. “It would look like it was extremely good value – it was delivered at half the cost of the last one and it got them lots of kudos, articles saying this is the sort of thing public broadcasters should be doing. But everything could change. Everyone who likes me could leave, there could be some new directive.” The ideal situation, he says, is to get a television series every few years, something that people would look forward to, and tour his live shows in between. “I’m in this for the long haul, I want to be doing this until I die. I am a standup comedian. I know a lot of people say I’m not,” he says with a smile, “but I am.” Stewart Lee’s Comedy Vehicle Series 2 DVD is out now. Tickets for his new full-length show at Leicester Square Theatre in London from 15 November 2011 are on sale Stewart Lee Comedy Television Comedy Emine Saner guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Smuggled letters allege authorities are using mass rape as a weapon inside Iran’s most notorious prisons Prison guards in Iran are giving condoms to criminals and encouraging them to systematically rape young opposition activists locked up with them, according to accounts from inside the country’s jail system. A series of dramatic letters written by prisoners and families of imprisoned activists allege that authorities are intentionally facilitating mass rape and using it as a form of punishment. Mehdi Mahmoudian, an outspoken member of Iran’s Participation Front, a reformist political party, is among those prisoners who have succeeded in smuggling out letters revealing the extent of rape inside some of the most notorious prisons. Mahmoudian was arrested in the aftermath of Iran’s 2009 disputed presidential election for speaking to the press about the regime’s suppression of the movement and is currently in Rajaeeshahr prison in Karaj, a city 12 miles (20km) to the west of the capital, Tehran. “In various cells inside the prison, rape has become a common act and acceptable,” he wrote in a letter published on Kaleme.com, the official website of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi. According to Mahmoudian and letters published on various opposition websites, political prisoners are locked up with some of the most dangerous criminals – murderers and ex-members of armed gangs. Meanwhile, 26 prominent political activists who have been in jail since the 2009 election have written to an official prison monitoring body accusing the government’s intelligence ministry and the revolutionary guards of harassing inmates with unlawful tactics that included sexual assaults. Mohsen Aminzadeh, a senior deputy foreign minister, Mohsen Mirdamadi, a leader of a reformist party and Behzad Nabavi, a veteran activist are among those who put their signatures on the letter. Speaking to Jaras, a website run by opposition activists, families of political prisoners have alleged that prison guards are failing to protect them from rape or sexual assault. “During exercise periods, the strong ask for sex without any consideration. Criminals are repeatedly seen with condoms in hand, hunting for their victims,” an unnamed family member told Jaras. “If the inmate is not powerful enough or guards would not take care of him, he will be certainly raped. Prison guards ignore those who are seen with condoms simply because they were given out to them by the guards at first place,” the family member said. The family members say prison guards are turning a blind eye to the systematic rape and have ignored complaints made by rape victims. Amnesty International, which has documented rape inside Iran’s prisons and interviewed victims for a 2010 report, called on Iran to launch an investigation into the recent allegations. Kristyan Benedict, Amnesty International UK’s Middle East campaign manager, told the Guardian: “Rape is a terrible crime and these allegations [mentioned in the letters] should be thoroughly investigated. Amnesty International has also documented the rape of male and female detainees by security officials. Many of those detained for taking part in post-election protests were tortured and did not receive fair trials. The Iranian authorities still continue to punish and persecute those who peacefully speak up against them.” According to Mahmoudian, who has been transferred to a solitary confinement after his letter attracted attention, one young prisoner was raped seven times in a single night. “In [Rajaeeshahr] prison, those who have pretty faces and are unable to defend themselves or cannot afford to bribe others are forcibly taken to different cells each night [to be raped],” he writes. “The situation is such that those exposed to rape even have an owner and that owner makes money by renting him out to others and after a while selling him to someone else.” Rape victims in Iran usually stay quiet in order to protect the honour of their family but at the time when journalists based in the country are facing strict restrictions, these letters have become one of the only sources of information about the situation of hundreds of imprisoned activists. Iranian officials have ignored the allegations and have previously denied any claims of rape inside jail. Iran Middle East Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Disgraced peer and former press baron appears before Chicago judge after almost a year free on bail Former press baron Conrad Black is bracing himself for a possible return to prison on Friday as a Chicago judge weighs up whether he must serve out the rest of his six and a half year sentence. The Canadian-born peer and former press magnate was sent to jail four years ago on fraud and obstruction of justice charges. He served 29 months and has been free on bail for nearly a year after challenging his sentence following a law change relating to one of his convictions. The former owner of the Telegraph newspapers will appear before justice Amy St Eve for re-sentencing. St Eve handed out his original sentence. Legal experts argue that Black, 66, may struggle to stay out of jail. “I think she will reimpose the original sentence and he will have to serve the rest of his time,” said attorney Andrew Stoltmann of Chicago-based Stoltmann Law. Black’s appeal focused on changes to the criminal code’s definition of “honest services”. Among Black’s convictions were charges that he deprived shareholders of his “honest services” when he embezzled $6.1m (£3.8m) for himself and other associates at Hollinger, his media company. The US supreme court tightened the definition of “honest services” last year, ruling that its use had become too broad and Black’s conviction on those charges was overturned. But legal opinion suggests the fraud conviction that the court upheld – involving Black and others taking $600,000 from the company – had nothing to do with honest service but was straightforward theft. St Eve will also consider Black’s conviction on obstruction of justice. The peer and his chauffeur were videotaped taking boxes of documents from his Toronto office after a court had prohibited their removal. Black was given 60 months for the fraud charges and 78 months for obstruction of justice, with both sentences to be served concurrently. St Eve could choose to uphold the original sentence, send him back to jail for a lesser time on the remaining convictions or allow him to stay free based on time served. When re-sentencing, judges are obliged to consider a defendants’ behaviour in jail and prosecutors have alleged that Black lorded it over his fellow prisoners. The peer treated fellow prisoners at Coleman Federal Correctional prison in Florida “like servants,” according to sworn affidavits filed in court earlier this month. Coleman staff claimed Black demanded special treatment, got prisoners to clean for him and do his ironing and was a poor tutor to his fellow inmates. In an email, Black said the accusations were “lies extorted by the prosecutors from susceptible Bureau of Prisons officials”. Stoltmann said St Eve could take the affidavits into consideration and had wide power of discretion in her sentencing. “Those are not the sort of opinions that you want hanging over you when you are asking a judge to shave time off your sentence,” he said. Conrad Black Telegraph Media Group Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Canada United States Daily Telegraph Sunday Telegraph Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …People who registered for first round but missed out get another chance to buy London 2012 tickets The second-chance scramble for seats at next year’s London Olympics has hit fresh trouble when the website selling tickets temporarily crashed. A 10-day first come, first served chance to pick up 2.3 million unsold tickets began at 6 am Friday but immediately hit problems due to a surge in demand. “It was like being at a tube station at rush hour – we had a few people held at the gates,” a spokeswoman for London 2012 said. “But it’s now transacting, people are purchasing tickets.” The second opportunity to buy tickets came as the system for alloting places was branded “a bit of a shambles” by Bradley Wiggins, the three-times Olympic cycle champion. Wiggins, among 1.2 million people who missed out on tickets in a first round ballot, said: “I think, as most of the public feels, it’s a bit of a shambles. “It’s a shame when you know what works so successfully in other Olympic Games, certainly Athens, that they couldn’t implement those ticket systems here.” Jeremy Hunt, the Olympics minister, has defended the process. “I don’t want to be arrogant about this … and say we got everything right at every stage,” he told the Times. “But if you look at the basic principles, the call was to make a lot of tickets available at low cost price and I think that was the right call.” Would-be buyers were using Twitter to vent their frustrations. “Has been processing payment for over an hour now, even though it says not to click back or refresh, that can’t be right can it?” wrote Simon Tipple . London 2012 was flooded with 22 million requests from 1.9 million people when 6.6 million tickets were originally made available to the public. So far 3 million tickets have been sold. The second chance sale includes tickets for 310 sessions including 44 medal events, but 1.7 million of the tickets are for football matches. There have been sell-outs for 21 events including the ceremonies, diving, swimming and tennis. Anyone who got tickets in the first round sale will get another chance to buy from 6am on 8 July to 6pm on 17 July. How to get your Olympic tickets Q: Who can apply? A: Only people who applied in the original sale, from 15 March to April 26, and came away with nothing. The first 10 days of sales in this second round is exclusive to them on a first come, first served basis. Q: How many can I buy? A: You can apply for a maximum of three sessions and six tickets per session for most sports. Football, volleyball and the walking race will have larger limits. Q: What tickets are available? A: There will be 2.3 million tickets on sale covering 310 sessions, including 44 medal events. These include 1.7 million tickets for football. Q: How much will they cost? A: There will be a range of prices and availability. There will be 1.5 million tickets costing £50 or less and more than half of these will cost £20 or less, according to London 2012. Q: When can I apply if I got some tickets in the first round? A: Anyone who got tickets in the first round sale will get another chance to buy from 6am on 8 July to 6pm on 17 July. Q: When can I apply if I have not registered for tickets? A: Your first chance will probably be next year. Olympic tickets Olympic Games 2012 Barry Neild guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Taking some commonly used medications in combination leads to an increased risk of death or brain impairment in over 65s, researchers have found The combined side-effects of commonly-used drugs can increase the risk of death and brain impairment in people over 65, according to a study of more than 13,000 people. Researchers have urged people who are taking a combination of medicines to review their intake with their doctors in light of the findings. The study was part of the Medical Research Council’s Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies project and looked at a specific class of commonly used drugs being taken by people over 65 over a two-year period. “The sort of drugs we’re looking at are used in allergies, depression, cardiac disease, bladder disease, pain relief and sometimes in anti-coagulation, very common drugs, some prescribed, some over the counter,” said Chris Fox, clinical senior lecturer at Norwich Medical School who led the research. The list includes over-the-counter medicines such as Piriton and Nytol, and the anti-depressant paroxetine, used in Seroxat. Fox rated the activity of different drugs on a messenger chemical in the brain on a three-point scale, with 0 for no effect and 3 for a severe effect. The results, published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society , showed that around 20% of those people who took a regimen of drugs that scored more than 4 on the scale had died in the two years of the study, compared with only 7% of those not taking any medication in the drug class. “For every extra point scored, the odds of dying increased by 26%,” said Fox. “We found it was a cumulative risk – not just the severity of the blockade but the number of drugs as well.” Ian Maidment , a pharmacist at Kent and Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust, said that many doctors, nurses and pharmacists may not be aware that these medicines have these problems and cited overuse of drugs as one of the factors adding to the cumulative burden on people over 65. “Often you see anti-histamines, which have a high burden, for hay fever and they are continued in the depths of winter when there is snow on the ground. The problem is that someone with dementia can’t say, ‘I don’t need anti-histamine,’ so it’s continued when it’s not needed.” Participants in the study who were taking drugs with a combined score of more than 5 also showed cognitive decline – they scored more than 4% lower in cognitive function tests compared with those who were taking no anticholinergic drugs. “The message here is for doctors to regularly review the medication of your older patients,” said Susanne Sorensen, head of research at the Alzheimer’s Society . “The message to patients is to ask, when you’re given medication, the pharmacist if what you’re buying at the counter has any side-effects and may be bad in combination with the other drugs you take..” Professor David Nutt , president of the British Neuroscience Association and vice-president of the European Brain Council, said that the negative effects of this class of drugs on brain and cardiac function had been known for decades and the latest study reinforced the dangers. Dr Tim Chico , an honorary consultant cardiologist at the University of Sheffield, added that all drugs had possible side effects, but the new results should not lead anyone to stop current medications without discussing this with their doctor first. “Before starting any drug, it is important for the doctor and patient to discuss the possible benefits of the treatment, compared with the potential downsides, so that the patient can make an informed decision. As a cardiologist, many of the drugs I use (such as beta-blockers) have been definitely proven to make people with heart disease live longer, so it’s important to balance these proven benefits against the risk of side effects.” Medical research Drugs Health Alok Jha guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Stock markets around world in make gains on hopes that €120bn EU rescue package means Greece avoids debt default Global stock markets bounced back on Friday after European Union leaders reached agreement on a €120bn (£105bn) EU bailout for Greece . Most Asian markets were up, with the Nikkei in Tokyo gaining 0.85% to 9678.71 and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rising 1.6% to 22,115.24. The FTSE 100 index in London opened 75 points higher. On Thursday, it closed down 98.61 points at 5674.38 after downbeat comments on the state of the economy from the US Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke. European leaders agreed on Thursday night to launch a fresh bailout of Greece, assuming the country passes an austerity package next week. Britain is to be spared from taking part in the rescue after leaders accepted David Cameron’s argument that the bailout should be borne by the eurozone. The rescue will be provided by Greece’s “euro partners and the International Monetary Fund”, meaning that Britain is exempt from the European part of the package. Germany had been insisting that the bailout should be partly funded by all 27 EU members, but backed off. Without the final tranche of last year’s €110bn bailout – €12bn from the eurozone and the IMF – Greece would be broke by mid-July. Brent crude oil rebounded by more than a dollar to $108.70 a barrel on Friday morning, after tumbling 6% on Thursday when the International Energy Agency announced the release of 60m barrels of emergency oil supplies on the market in an attempt to stem soaring petrol and other energy prices. US crude climbed to $92.34 a barrel. It is only the third time in the 37-year history of the IEA that oil has been released in this way and follows repeated calls on Opec to turn on the taps and bring down the price of oil. European debt crisis Stock markets Greece Europe Europe Julia Kollewe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Just days after telling her employer she was pregnant, Danniella McClain was made redundant. And the number of similar cases of sexual discrimination is rising Be open, honest, and unapologetic – this is the approach pregnancy manuals advise women to take when informing their employers they are going to have a baby. Most manuals also recognise that this can be one of the most stressful parts of early pregnancy. Danniella McClain, 28, waited until she reached the 13-week milestone and had seen the foetus on a scan before telling her boss. She was anxious, but fairly confident that it would be a straightforward conversation. Within seconds it was obvious the news was unwelcome; within days she was made redundant. After a protracted legal battle, McClain won a claim against her former employer on the grounds that he had subjected her to sex discrimination, related to her pregnancy, when he dismissed her. The case represents a rare legal success in an area of discrimination that often goes unchecked. Although news of large payouts to City executives make occasional headlines, cases involving relatively low-paid women who are either sacked or bullied into resigning are far more common, and yet go to trial far less frequently – usually because the women are unable to afford basic legal advice. McClain’s story is striking because it is such a brazen instance of an employer taking rapid action to dispense with a staff member on hearing news of her pregnancy. McClain came in to work at the London estate agents, Hogarth, where she had been employed for nine months, on a Monday morning in late September 2009, noted that the company’s owner was in a good mood, and decided this was the moment to tell him her news. His response was not what she had expected. “He said: ‘Right, right . . . OK’,” she
Continue reading …Title: The Echo Artist: The Epsilons Thursday! Time for a little bit of soul. The Epsilons were managed by Otis Redding and disbanded after his tragic death. They also backed Arthur Conley on his hit “Sweet Soul Music”. What’s your favorite bit of soul?
Continue reading …