Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 784)
Michele Bachmann’s Praise of John Wayne and Why Our Corporate Media Will Never Say Why It’s Really Ridiculous

Click here to view this media After all of us had a bit of fun with Michele Bachmann’s gaffe on John Wayne this week , I think it’s important to point out why even if she got confused over where John Wayne was born and where serial killer John Wayne Gacy carried out his serial murders, the issue that our corporate media refused to address is the fact that she was praising John Wayne as some role model that Republicans should be emulating in the first place, and her saying “That’s the kind of spirit that I have, too” and completely ignoring how ridiculous propping that man up as some bastion of conservatism is to begin with. That is if you want to actually look at how he actually lived his life and not the myth that’s been propagated in our media about him and that Michele Bachmann apparently decided to embrace. Salon’s Glenn Greenwald wrote a really excellent book back in 2008 which I bought and thoroughly enjoyed reading shortly after it came out titled Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics . If you want to read more, go buy it but I’m going to share a bit of the preface here that explains in very clear terms why any praise of John Wayne as we heard from Bachmann should be ripe for mockery, but since it’s our media that’s been more than happy to participate in continuing that myth about Wayne and others that Greenwald addressed in his book, we’re never going to hear any of them talk about this. If we do I’ll be pleasantly surprised, but I’m not holding my breath. Rough transcript of some of Glenn’s opening to his book below the fold. For the past three decades, American politics has been driven by a bizarre anomaly. Polls continuously show that on almost every issue, Americans vastly prefer the politics of the Democratic Party to those of the Republican Party. Yet during that time, the Republicans have won the majority of elections. This book examines how and why that has happened. The most important factor, by far, is that the Republican Party employs the same set of personality smears and mythical, psychological, and cultural images to win elections. These myths and smears are amplified by the right-wing noise machine and mindlessly adopted by the establishment media. Right-wing leaders are inflated into heroic cultural icons, while Democrats are demonized as weak and hapless losers. These personality-based myths overwhelm substantive discussions and consideration of the issues. Time and time again, Americans vote Republican due to their perceptions that right-wing leaders exude such admirable personality traits as courage, conviction, strength, wholesome family morality, identification with the “regular guy,” an affection for the military, fiscal restraint, and a belief in the supremacy of the individual over the government. Ronald Reagan, the wholesome “Everyman” rancher, and George W. Bush, the swaggering, conquering cowboy rode to victory on the basis of the cartoon imagery and marketing themes that defined them. […] The sheer pervasiveness of this political deceit is somewhat new, but the deceit itself goes back decades. As examined in Chapter One, one of the earliest pioneers of this manipulative right-wing marketing was John Wayne. Wayne was a draft dodger during World War II, staying home in Hollywood, getting rich by playacting as a war hero in one film after the next while his acting peers were off fighting in combat. Wayne then spent the rest of his life preening around as a swaggering, uber-patriotic tough guy—cheering for one war after another and viciously castigating war opponents as cowards and subversives. With the enormous gap between his self-righteous moralizing rhetoric and the way he actually lived his life, John Wayne proved himself to be one of the first right-wing Great American Hypocrites. He tirelessly crusaded for wholesome American morals and publicly condemned any perceived deviations. Yet Wayne’s personal life was a never-ending carousel of adultery, divorces, new wives, shattered families, pills, booze, and unrestrained hedonism. Maybe one of these days someone in our media will ask Bachmann why a draft-dodging, fake war hero adulterer, divorcee, drunken, pill popping hedonist like Wayne is someone she’d like to emulate, but I’m not counting on that happening any time soon.

Continue reading …
Michele Bachmann’s Praise of John Wayne and Why Our Corporate Media Will Never Say Why It’s Really Ridiculous

Click here to view this media After all of us had a bit of fun with Michele Bachmann’s gaffe on John Wayne this week , I think it’s important to point out why even if she got confused over where John Wayne was born and where serial killer John Wayne Gacy carried out his serial murders, the issue that our corporate media refused to address is the fact that she was praising John Wayne as some role model that Republicans should be emulating in the first place, and her saying “That’s the kind of spirit that I have, too” and completely ignoring how ridiculous propping that man up as some bastion of conservatism is to begin with. That is if you want to actually look at how he actually lived his life and not the myth that’s been propagated in our media about him and that Michele Bachmann apparently decided to embrace. Salon’s Glenn Greenwald wrote a really excellent book back in 2008 which I bought and thoroughly enjoyed reading shortly after it came out titled Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics . If you want to read more, go buy it but I’m going to share a bit of the preface here that explains in very clear terms why any praise of John Wayne as we heard from Bachmann should be ripe for mockery, but since it’s our media that’s been more than happy to participate in continuing that myth about Wayne and others that Greenwald addressed in his book, we’re never going to hear any of them talk about this. If we do I’ll be pleasantly surprised, but I’m not holding my breath. Rough transcript of some of Glenn’s opening to his book below the fold. For the past three decades, American politics has been driven by a bizarre anomaly. Polls continuously show that on almost every issue, Americans vastly prefer the politics of the Democratic Party to those of the Republican Party. Yet during that time, the Republicans have won the majority of elections. This book examines how and why that has happened. The most important factor, by far, is that the Republican Party employs the same set of personality smears and mythical, psychological, and cultural images to win elections. These myths and smears are amplified by the right-wing noise machine and mindlessly adopted by the establishment media. Right-wing leaders are inflated into heroic cultural icons, while Democrats are demonized as weak and hapless losers. These personality-based myths overwhelm substantive discussions and consideration of the issues. Time and time again, Americans vote Republican due to their perceptions that right-wing leaders exude such admirable personality traits as courage, conviction, strength, wholesome family morality, identification with the “regular guy,” an affection for the military, fiscal restraint, and a belief in the supremacy of the individual over the government. Ronald Reagan, the wholesome “Everyman” rancher, and George W. Bush, the swaggering, conquering cowboy rode to victory on the basis of the cartoon imagery and marketing themes that defined them. […] The sheer pervasiveness of this political deceit is somewhat new, but the deceit itself goes back decades. As examined in Chapter One, one of the earliest pioneers of this manipulative right-wing marketing was John Wayne. Wayne was a draft dodger during World War II, staying home in Hollywood, getting rich by playacting as a war hero in one film after the next while his acting peers were off fighting in combat. Wayne then spent the rest of his life preening around as a swaggering, uber-patriotic tough guy—cheering for one war after another and viciously castigating war opponents as cowards and subversives. With the enormous gap between his self-righteous moralizing rhetoric and the way he actually lived his life, John Wayne proved himself to be one of the first right-wing Great American Hypocrites. He tirelessly crusaded for wholesome American morals and publicly condemned any perceived deviations. Yet Wayne’s personal life was a never-ending carousel of adultery, divorces, new wives, shattered families, pills, booze, and unrestrained hedonism. Maybe one of these days someone in our media will ask Bachmann why a draft-dodging, fake war hero adulterer, divorcee, drunken, pill popping hedonist like Wayne is someone she’d like to emulate, but I’m not counting on that happening any time soon.

Continue reading …
Michele Bachmann’s Praise of John Wayne and Why Our Corporate Media Will Never Say Why It’s Really Ridiculous

Click here to view this media After all of us had a bit of fun with Michele Bachmann’s gaffe on John Wayne this week , I think it’s important to point out why even if she got confused over where John Wayne was born and where serial killer John Wayne Gacy carried out his serial murders, the issue that our corporate media refused to address is the fact that she was praising John Wayne as some role model that Republicans should be emulating in the first place, and her saying “That’s the kind of spirit that I have, too” and completely ignoring how ridiculous propping that man up as some bastion of conservatism is to begin with. That is if you want to actually look at how he actually lived his life and not the myth that’s been propagated in our media about him and that Michele Bachmann apparently decided to embrace. Salon’s Glenn Greenwald wrote a really excellent book back in 2008 which I bought and thoroughly enjoyed reading shortly after it came out titled Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics . If you want to read more, go buy it but I’m going to share a bit of the preface here that explains in very clear terms why any praise of John Wayne as we heard from Bachmann should be ripe for mockery, but since it’s our media that’s been more than happy to participate in continuing that myth about Wayne and others that Greenwald addressed in his book, we’re never going to hear any of them talk about this. If we do I’ll be pleasantly surprised, but I’m not holding my breath. Rough transcript of some of Glenn’s opening to his book below the fold. For the past three decades, American politics has been driven by a bizarre anomaly. Polls continuously show that on almost every issue, Americans vastly prefer the politics of the Democratic Party to those of the Republican Party. Yet during that time, the Republicans have won the majority of elections. This book examines how and why that has happened. The most important factor, by far, is that the Republican Party employs the same set of personality smears and mythical, psychological, and cultural images to win elections. These myths and smears are amplified by the right-wing noise machine and mindlessly adopted by the establishment media. Right-wing leaders are inflated into heroic cultural icons, while Democrats are demonized as weak and hapless losers. These personality-based myths overwhelm substantive discussions and consideration of the issues. Time and time again, Americans vote Republican due to their perceptions that right-wing leaders exude such admirable personality traits as courage, conviction, strength, wholesome family morality, identification with the “regular guy,” an affection for the military, fiscal restraint, and a belief in the supremacy of the individual over the government. Ronald Reagan, the wholesome “Everyman” rancher, and George W. Bush, the swaggering, conquering cowboy rode to victory on the basis of the cartoon imagery and marketing themes that defined them. […] The sheer pervasiveness of this political deceit is somewhat new, but the deceit itself goes back decades. As examined in Chapter One, one of the earliest pioneers of this manipulative right-wing marketing was John Wayne. Wayne was a draft dodger during World War II, staying home in Hollywood, getting rich by playacting as a war hero in one film after the next while his acting peers were off fighting in combat. Wayne then spent the rest of his life preening around as a swaggering, uber-patriotic tough guy—cheering for one war after another and viciously castigating war opponents as cowards and subversives. With the enormous gap between his self-righteous moralizing rhetoric and the way he actually lived his life, John Wayne proved himself to be one of the first right-wing Great American Hypocrites. He tirelessly crusaded for wholesome American morals and publicly condemned any perceived deviations. Yet Wayne’s personal life was a never-ending carousel of adultery, divorces, new wives, shattered families, pills, booze, and unrestrained hedonism. Maybe one of these days someone in our media will ask Bachmann why a draft-dodging, fake war hero adulterer, divorcee, drunken, pill popping hedonist like Wayne is someone she’d like to emulate, but I’m not counting on that happening any time soon.

Continue reading …
Tom Petty reportedly issuing cease and desist letter to Bachmann

Click here to view this media Tom Petty may be taking legal action to make sure Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann stops using his songs at her campaign events. “NBC News: @TomPetty unhappy with Michele Bachmann’s use of ‘American Girl’ and in process of issuing [a cease and desist] letter,” Matt Ortega reported on Twitter only hours after hours after Bachmann used the popular song to kick off her campaign. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell confirmed that report Monday night. “And details matter, and when Bachmann left the stage here, her campaign played the Tom Petty hit song, ‘American Girl,’” O’Donnell said. “Turns out Petty isn’t pleased. His manager says they will ask the Bachmann campaign not to use that song.” Petty also issued a cease and desist letter to then-Governor George W. Bush for illegally using “I won’t back down” at his rallies. “The impression that you and your campaign have been endorsed by Tom Petty, which is not true,” music publisher Wixen Music Publishing Inc. told the Bush campaign . To make matters worse for Bachmann, former RNC Online Communications Director Liz Mair made this observation about the use of Petty’s tune: “Isn’t that what the kidnapped politician’s daughter was singing in ‘Silence of the Lambs?’ Mair appears to have since deleted that tweet. It’s been a tough campaign roll out for the Minnesota Republican. On Sunday, Fox News’ Chris Wallace asked if she was a “flake.” And prior to Monday’s official announcement that she was seeking the presidency, Bachmann confused actor John Wayne with serial killer John Wayne Gacy.

Continue reading …
Tom Petty reportedly issuing cease and desist letter to Bachmann

Click here to view this media Tom Petty may be taking legal action to make sure Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann stops using his songs at her campaign events. “NBC News: @TomPetty unhappy with Michele Bachmann’s use of ‘American Girl’ and in process of issuing [a cease and desist] letter,” Matt Ortega reported on Twitter only hours after hours after Bachmann used the popular song to kick off her campaign. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell confirmed that report Monday night. “And details matter, and when Bachmann left the stage here, her campaign played the Tom Petty hit song, ‘American Girl,’” O’Donnell said. “Turns out Petty isn’t pleased. His manager says they will ask the Bachmann campaign not to use that song.” Petty also issued a cease and desist letter to then-Governor George W. Bush for illegally using “I won’t back down” at his rallies. “The impression that you and your campaign have been endorsed by Tom Petty, which is not true,” music publisher Wixen Music Publishing Inc. told the Bush campaign . To make matters worse for Bachmann, former RNC Online Communications Director Liz Mair made this observation about the use of Petty’s tune: “Isn’t that what the kidnapped politician’s daughter was singing in ‘Silence of the Lambs?’ Mair appears to have since deleted that tweet. It’s been a tough campaign roll out for the Minnesota Republican. On Sunday, Fox News’ Chris Wallace asked if she was a “flake.” And prior to Monday’s official announcement that she was seeking the presidency, Bachmann confused actor John Wayne with serial killer John Wayne Gacy.

Continue reading …
Tom Petty reportedly issuing cease and desist letter to Bachmann

Click here to view this media Tom Petty may be taking legal action to make sure Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann stops using his songs at her campaign events. “NBC News: @TomPetty unhappy with Michele Bachmann’s use of ‘American Girl’ and in process of issuing [a cease and desist] letter,” Matt Ortega reported on Twitter only hours after hours after Bachmann used the popular song to kick off her campaign. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell confirmed that report Monday night. “And details matter, and when Bachmann left the stage here, her campaign played the Tom Petty hit song, ‘American Girl,’” O’Donnell said. “Turns out Petty isn’t pleased. His manager says they will ask the Bachmann campaign not to use that song.” Petty also issued a cease and desist letter to then-Governor George W. Bush for illegally using “I won’t back down” at his rallies. “The impression that you and your campaign have been endorsed by Tom Petty, which is not true,” music publisher Wixen Music Publishing Inc. told the Bush campaign . To make matters worse for Bachmann, former RNC Online Communications Director Liz Mair made this observation about the use of Petty’s tune: “Isn’t that what the kidnapped politician’s daughter was singing in ‘Silence of the Lambs?’ Mair appears to have since deleted that tweet. It’s been a tough campaign roll out for the Minnesota Republican. On Sunday, Fox News’ Chris Wallace asked if she was a “flake.” And prior to Monday’s official announcement that she was seeking the presidency, Bachmann confused actor John Wayne with serial killer John Wayne Gacy.

Continue reading …
Case Shiller Home Price ‘Boost’ Disappears After Seasonal Adjustment; AP, S&P Like the Raw Numbers Better

While the vast majority of those in the establishment press doggedly insist on reporting seasonally adjusted numbers in most economic spheres, there is an odd exception: Standard & Poor's Case-Shiller Home Price Indices . Not that it's completely the press's fault. S&P emphasizes the raw numbers over the seasonally adjusted ones, and for a pretty good reason: The raw numbers represent what's really happening on the ground with home prices. In the current economy, the seasonal calculations can't really be said to reflect typical seasonal patterns. Of course, this logic should apply to other key areas, particularly employment, but we (or maybe it's the reporters) are apparently not mature enough to understand large monthly swings in jobs added or lost, or able to see them in the context of previous years. Given that the press usually hangs its hat on seasonal numbers, you'd think they'd be more than a little shy about copying S&P's press release, which today described a very small increase as a a “boost” in home prices , which disppeared after seasonal adjustment, as seen below: Poof! After seasonal adjustment, the already highly questionable “boost” evaporates (since when is 0.7% or 0.8% a “boost,” especially coming off bottom-feeding lows?). In five cities, the seasonal adjustment process, suspect as it is, turned an increase into a decrease. As one would expect, Derek Kravitz at the Associated Press was among Case/Shiller's biggest “boosters” : Spring buying boosts home prices in 13 US cities

Continue reading …
Case Shiller Home Price ‘Boost’ Disappears After Seasonal Adjustment; AP, S&P Like the Raw Numbers Better

While the vast majority of those in the establishment press doggedly insist on reporting seasonally adjusted numbers in most economic spheres, there is an odd exception: Standard & Poor's Case-Shiller Home Price Indices . Not that it's completely the press's fault. S&P emphasizes the raw numbers over the seasonally adjusted ones, and for a pretty good reason: The raw numbers represent what's really happening on the ground with home prices. In the current economy, the seasonal calculations can't really be said to reflect typical seasonal patterns. Of course, this logic should apply to other key areas, particularly employment, but we (or maybe it's the reporters) are apparently not mature enough to understand large monthly swings in jobs added or lost, or able to see them in the context of previous years. Given that the press usually hangs its hat on seasonal numbers, you'd think they'd be more than a little shy about copying S&P's press release, which today described a very small increase as a a “boost” in home prices , which disppeared after seasonal adjustment, as seen below: Poof! After seasonal adjustment, the already highly questionable “boost” evaporates (since when is 0.7% or 0.8% a “boost,” especially coming off bottom-feeding lows?). In five cities, the seasonal adjustment process, suspect as it is, turned an increase into a decrease. As one would expect, Derek Kravitz at the Associated Press was among Case/Shiller's biggest “boosters” : Spring buying boosts home prices in 13 US cities

Continue reading …
Gabrielle Giffords Makes First Public Appearance Since Tucson Shooting

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords appeared in public on Monday evening for the first time since being shot in the head in January. Appearing in a wheelchair at an awards ceremony at Space Center Houston, Giffords reportedly stood up briefly to hug and kiss her husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly upon his receiving a Spaceflight Medal. Although

Continue reading …
Teachers’ strike participants ‘being intimidated’, union claims

Association of Teachers and Lecturers general secretary says members threatened with disciplinary action if they strike Teachers who are planning to join Thursday’s strike are being intimidated and told they could face disciplinary action if they walk out over pension reforms, a teaching union has claimed. Mary Bousted, the general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers – which is striking for the first time in its 127-year history – said her members had reported being threatened with disciplinary action if they strike, or told that their actions would bring their school into disrepute. One London borough, Conservative-led Hammersmith and Fulham, wrote to staff to tell them to “ignore plans to strike” and that it was advising those intent on taking part in the walkout that they should make up the time to pupils. Helen Binmore, the borough’s cabinet member for children’s services, said: “We have suggested to the schools that, as the strike is a foreseen closure, they should consider offering their pupils an additional day’s education where possible.” The government said that more than 5,300 of England’s 23,000 schools were expected to be affected by the strike with nearly 3,300 confirming they will close. The education secretary, Michael Gove, was in talks with individual union leaders by phone in an attempt to avoid strikes. Bousted said the Hammersmith and Fulham letter was a “deliberate move to intimidate” teachers, and the suggestion that teachers should work an extra day to make up for strike action was “completely inaccurate and wrong”. Gove said that 3,206 state schools in England are confirmed to be closing on Thursday along with 84 academies. A further 2,206 state schools and 128 academies will be partially closed. The rest are unknown but government officials will be updating the figures on Wednesday. Teaching Trade unions Schools Public sector pensions Public sector cuts Public finance Michael Gove Hélène Mulholland Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …