Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 678)
Martin Bashir on NBC’s ‘Today’: Rupert Murdoch ‘A Combination of Jack Abramoff and James ‘Whitey’ Bulger’

Appearing on Thursday's NBC Today, MSNBC host Martin Bashir shared his thoughts on the tabloid phone hacking scandal in Britain and proclaimed that News Corporation owner Rupert Murdoch was “…a combination of Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist, and someone like James 'Whitey' Bulger, the mobster.” [ Audio available here ] Despite Bashir's outrageous comparison – Abramoff was convicted on corruption charges and Bulger is accused of 19 murders during his time as the head of the Irish mob in Boston – co-host Matt Lauer offered no objection to the claim. View video after the jump In fact, Lauer began the discussion by praising Bashir's insight into news stories: “Sometimes when I have you, I like to just ask the simplest question first because I like your take.” Lauer then asked: “So as you've watched this story unfold over the last month or so, what jumps out at you?” In addition to describing Murdoch as a crime boss, Bashir declared: “It's the power of Rupert Murdoch. It's hard to imagine the power that he exerted on politicians….And what he had was the power to reward and to punish….Coercion by humiliation.” Lauer followed up by attacking the close relationship between many British politicians and Murdoch: “Look at what's happened over the last week or so. These politicians who used to have a very close, some would say incestuous relationship with Murdoch are now running from him as fast as they can run from him. Which, by the way, is typical of politics, but how much of a problem is it for Rupert Murdoch?” Bashir replied: “It's a massive problem.” Here is a full transcript of the July 14 discussion: 7:13AM ET MATT LAUER: Martin Bashir is the host of the Martin Bashir Show on MSNBC. Martin, it's good to have you here. BASHIR: Thank you, Matt. LAUER: Sometimes when I have you, I like to just ask the simplest question first because I like your take, you spent a lot of time as a journalist in the UK and here in the United States. MARTIN BASHIR: I worked for the Sunday Times between 1984 and 1985. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Murdoch Under Fire; How Will Phone Hacking Scandal Impact Media Empire?] LAUER: Exactly. So as you've watched this story unfold over the last month or so, what jumps out at you? BASHIR: It's the power of Rupert Murdoch. It's hard to imagine the power that he exerted on politicians. Imagine a combination of Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist, and someone like James 'Whitey' Bulger, the mobster. And what he had was the power to reward and to punish. So for example, in 2004, when an MP stood up and said she thought having semi-naked women on page three of The Sun newspaper was now something we shouldn't do anymore, they sent 20 semi-naked people to her constituency office and called her 'fat, frumpy and dumpy.' Coercion by humiliation. LAUER: So – but look at what's happened over the last week or so. These politicians who used to have a very close, some would say incestuous relationship with Murdoch… BASHIR: Absolutely. Indeed. LAUER: …are now running from him as fast as they can run from him. Which, by the way, is typical of politics, but how much of a problem is it for Rupert Murdoch? BASHIR: It's a massive problem. Remember, The Sun and the News of the World were the only two newspapers that made him any money. The Times loses money in London. But the thing he desperately wanted BSkyB Broadcasting, because it's the television arm that makes the billions of pounds and now he's had to withdraw because he knows the politicians were not going to support that. LAUER: Well, but also, not only the politicians wouldn't support it, but does he also – do you think that deal is now dead because the people in Murdoch's organization understand that there is probably more damaging evidence about to come out? BASHIR: When they did the inquiry in 2007, they said there was one rogue reporter and about eight people had been hacked. Yesterday I spoke to a senior officer at the Metropolitan Police who said 4,800 people's phones had been hacked and they haven't even started to get to the bottom of the things that have been done. LAUER: This has pulled back a curtain, if you will, and exposed a very dark side of tabloid journalism. I guess the question a lot of people here in the States want to know, and let's face it, you could almost hear this story being pulled across the Atlantic… BASHIR: No doubt. LAUER: …yesterday, with these Senators writing letters to Eric Holder and a congressman writing to Mr. Mueller at the FBI. How much further does this go? Do you think this is a standard practice for tabloid newspaper and scandal magazines here in the U.S.? BASHIR: It's hard to know, but imagine, they said one reporter, but now it was clearly widespread in the News of the World news room. Are you telling me that people who work in that organization in this country have never ever used the same tactics? They may not have, but at the end of the day, the pressure to deliver the kind of stories, the kind of access – remember, we're talk about the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom's disabled son's medical records. He stands up in the House of Commons yesterday and he says the Sunday Times newspaper paid a criminal to procure those records. Now, we can't confirm whether that's true. But that's the level of interest that people had. And when stories kept appearing in tabloid papers, you had to ask yourself, 'How did they get that story?' After I interviewed Princess Diana in 1995, we had our third child in '96, Eliza, and she was incubated after birth because she was – she had problems with her lungs. Within two day, two journalists attempted to get into the ward, both of them working for The Sun newspaper. How did they know, when nobody else knew, that our daughter, who was just two days old, was unwell? LAUER: Clearly someone had access they shouldn't have had. BASHIR: Somebody had access. LAUER: Martin Bashir. Martin, always good to have you here. BASHIR: Great to be here. LAUER: Thanks very much. 17 after the hour. You can catch Martin's show weekdays at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time on MSNBC.

Continue reading …
Israel’s boycott ban draws fire from law professors

Prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu defends controversial measure but legal experts, including some rightwingers, say it damages freedom of expression Israel’s new law effectively banning political boycotts is unconstitutional and does grievous harm to freedom of expression and protest, three dozen eminent Israeli law professors have said in a petition. The move followed prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s robust defence of the law in the Knesset (parliament) on Wednesday in which he said he was “against boycotts aimed at the Jewish state”. The petition, sent to attorney-general Yehuda Weinstein, was signed by the deans of many of Israel’s law schools, including some associated with the political right. “This law is a classic case of the tyranny of the majority,” said Alon Harel of Hebrew University, one of the instigators of the petition. “The majority aims at silencing, persecuting and threatening the minority. It conflicts directly with the principles established in Israel in the 1990s that entrench the right to freedom of speech in the legal system. It is the most cherished right in the Israeli legal system.” Under the Law for Prevention of Damage to the State of Israel through Boycott , an individual or organisation proposing a boycott may be sued for compensation by any individual or institution facing possible damage as a result. Evidence of actual damage will not be required. It bans consumer boycotts of goods and services produced in West Bank settlements and the blacklisting of cultural and academic institutions in settlements. It also bars the government from doing business with companies that comply with boycotts. Boycotts were a standard form of protest in Israel, Harel said. But the new law was a “non-neutral restriction”. “Speech or action which promotes one viewpoint is protected and sanctioned, yet speech which promotes another viewpoint is prohibited,” he said. Boycotts by ultra-orthodox Jews against the Israeli national airline El Al over flying on the sabbath or by Israeli tourists against Turkey following last year’s flotilla had not been targeted, he said. Harel said the new law had to be seen within a wider context: “Basically, Israel is still a lively democracy. But this is part of a campaign to win the political struggle not through free elections and political discourse but through silencing certain sections of society.” Several civil rights groups have launched a challenge to the new law in Israel’s supreme court and high court of justice. Another bill is to be brought before the Knesset next week which allows the investigation of the funding of human and civil rights groups in Israel. Many groups say this is unnecessary as their funding is totally transparent and they claim it is part of a wider campaign of harassment and an attempt to restrict their actions. Two rightwing members of the Knesset announced on Wednesday they would present a further bill allowing the Knesset to veto supreme court appointments. The right has criticised its judges for decisions it considers to be against Israel’s interests. The bill, which is not widely supported, is unlikely to succeed. The speaker of the Knesset, Reuven Rivlin, said: “The threat to the supreme court is a danger to democracy.” Despite being absent for Monday night’s vote in favour of the law, Netanyahu told the Knesset: “I don’t want anyone to be confused. I approved the law. If I hadn’t backed it, it wouldn’t have passed. I am against boycotts aimed at the Jewish state.” He denied the new law damaged Israel’s image. “What mars its image are the reckless, irresponsible attacks against the legitimate attempt by a democracy on the defensive to draw a line between what is acceptable and what isn’t acceptable,” he said. Matthew Gould, the British ambassador to Israel, came under fire for saying in an interview with Israeli newspaper Maariv that the UK was concerned about the law. “For a foreign diplomat to take such a public stance is highly unusual,” a foreign ministry official said. “It is not customary for an ambassador to speak out against a legislative process.” In a separate development, nursery schools in Israel are to be required to raise the Israeli flag and sing the national anthem at least once a week to strengthen children’s Zionist values. Kindergartens in Arab areas will be exempt from the requirement, issued by the education ministry. Israel Middle East Binyamin Netanyahu Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Olympic Marseille struggles to attract top talent due to ‘home-jacking’

Vitorino Hilton and Lucho González among Marseille players to suffer armed robberies at their homes Marseille’s efforts to shed its reputation as a crime capital have been dealt a blow with a warning from the city’s football team that a spate of violent robberies of star players is making it difficult to attract top talent to the club. The homes of players for Olympic Marseille, the Ligue 1 team and former French champions, have become a regular target for armed robberies, known as “home-jackings”. This week the Brazilian defender Vitorino Hilton was at his gated Marseille home with 10 family members when an armed gang of six broke in just before midnight. They held the footballer’s relatives hostage before hitting Hilton on the head with the butt of a gun several times and escaping with cash, jewellery, computers and designer bags. Hilton told French radio station RMC: “As I’d been hit on the head, I was bleeding a lot, [my children] panicked.” He said his children were scared and wanted to go back to Brazil. The Argentinian Lucho González, one of the highest paid footballers in France, was said to have been left traumatised after an armed gang attacked him and his family at home in Aix-en-Provence in March. After 10 attacks on players in 18 months Olympic Marseille announced it had set up private security patrols around players’ homes in the city and surrounding area, and called on local authorities to crack down on crime. Marseille will be European capital of culture in 2013 and is undergoing major architectural and cultural renovations. But Olympic Marseille’s sporting director, José Anigo, said he was struggling to attract new star players because of the city’s reputation. “Every time I signed a player this year the first questions they asked were ‘can you guarantee security?’ and ‘are my family at risk?’” he told a press conference. “Bringing players to Marseille in those conditions is complicated. You have to be a magician.” The club said it would be nonsensical to tell players not to wear designer watches and drive expensive cars. “Everyone has the right to profit from their earnings,” said Anigo. But the club admitted it may begin advising players to move to secure apartment blocks rather than isolated houses. Marseille France Europe Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

As Atrios said yesterday, “Governing by crisis is an undemocratic way for our overlords to try to avoid accountability.” We’ve seen a lot of that lately. This is a problem with both parties, but it’s especially egregious in the Republican party because they quite literally believe that any positions but their own are inherently illegitimate. Like Our Drama Queen Mitch, who sputtered up a storm over this: The time has come for a balanced budget amendment that forces Washington to balance its books. If these debt negotiations have convinced us of anything, it’s that we can’t leave it to politicians in Washington to make the difficult decisions that they need to get our fiscal house in order. The balanced budget amendment will do that for them. Now is the moment. No more games. No more gimmicks. The Constitution must be amended to keep the government in check. We’ve tried persuasion. We’ve tried negotiations. We’re tried elections. Nothing has worked. Wow. Now, in a rational world, real conservatives would be calling for his head, because what he’s calling for here is a figurative coup. Elections have consequences, Mitch. But his reaction? Screw those voters, we don’t need them ! This is, after all, how they operate. From Bush v. Gore on down, that’s what Republicans have done: lied, cheated, stolen, suppressed votes — you name it. Why? Because whenever voters understand what Republicans really want, they reject it. The Republican agenda is deeply anti-democratic. I don’t think anyone can seriously argue otherwise, and yesterday Mitch McConnell opened his mouth and proved it. Balanced budget amendment, huh? Oh sure, sounds good if you don’t ever think about it. But what you’re saying is that the United States government won’t have any wiggle room at all, say, for rebuilding after a 9.2 earthquake along the San Andreas fault, or a dirty bomb set off by terrorists. (Or by yet another offshore oil disaster.) Of course, Mitch wouldn’t be able to get away with this if a Democratic president had simply slapped him down like a fly the first time he started talking about this nonsense instead of solemnly regurgitating the right-wing “kitchen table” belt-tightening talking points that have painted our country into an economic corner. It would be nice if we didn’t have a wingnut enabler in the White House. Mr. President, don’t encourage them!

Continue reading …
Open Thread: Why Did Obama Walk Out on Debt Negotiations?

Two days after

Continue reading …
The Euro Crisis Song | video

With each passing day the Euro crisis deepens, spreading to more countries with ever more dramatic consequences. But are you still struggling to understand how we got here? To help you out, we present The Euro Crisis Song

Continue reading …
Karachi shuts down after night of violence leaves 12 dead

Provincial minister with the ruling Pakistan People’s party sparks protests after diatribe against opposition party The centre of Karachi has been left deserted after 12 people were killed in a night of violence sparked by a government minister’s blazing verbal assault on “wretched” opposition supporters. Zulfikar Mirza, a senior provincial minister with the ruling Pakistan People’s party (PPP), unleashed such an uncontrolled barrage on the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) – a political force most people are afraid to criticise even mildly – that members of his own party had to physically take him away from the microphones at an impromptu press conference. The city of 18 million people, Pakistan’s economic powerhouse, has shut for business, with the city centre deserted and factory workers unable to get to work because public transport was suspended. Markets, banks and shops were shuttered. Dozens of cars were set on fire and shops burnt in the violence. The streets of many poorer residential areas, where MQM supporters live, thronged with angry protesters who burned effigies of Mirza. The two other big cities in southern Sindh province, Hyderabad and Sukkur, were similarly shut down, with MQM supporters out in force. The MQM represents “mohajirs”, speakers of the Urdu language who fled India after partition in 1947, with many settling in Karachi, where they vastly outnumber the indigenous population. The party has a thuggish reputation for its alleged involvement in extortion and other rackets, though it denies connection to any criminality. “For your own sake, for Pakistan’s sake, for Karachi’s sake, stand up and rid us of these wretched people,” Mirza said in his diatribe. “They came to this province when they were hungry and naked and we took them in.” Mirza, who is close to president Asif Zardari, said that if the Urdu speakers wanted to carve their own province out from Sindh, “they will have to step over our dead bodies first”. He also lacerated the party’s leader, Altaf Hussain, who has lived in exile in London for decades, calling him “the biggest criminal”. Separately, the PPP’s interior minister, Rehman Malik, bizarrely claimed that 70 of 100 people killed last week in Karachi, in apparent targeted assassinations of supporters of different political parties, were in fact killed by their “wives and girlfriends”. While the MQM is the biggest political force in Karachi, it faces two rivals with their own violent followings. As well as the PPP, which has a stranglehold on the Lyari district of the city, there is also the Awami National party, which represents the huge ethnic Pashtun population of Karachi, who have moved from the north-west of the country. According to the MQM, the growth of the Pashtun population has led to the “Talibanisation” of Karachi, with extremists creating no-go areas. Clashes between the armed supporters of the three parties periodically sets off tit-for-tat killings that go on for days. At stake are political and criminal fiefdoms. Last year over 1,000 people died in the gang-related violence, the highest figure in 15 years. Even before Mirza’s outburst, poorer parts of Karachi had last week seen running gun battles on the streets, requiring the paramilitary Rangers force to be deployed. In a statement on Thursday afternoon, Mirza apologized, saying that “Urdu-speaking people are my brothers and sisters”. Most supplies for Nato troops in Afghanistan pass through Karachi’s port, where they are loaded on to trucks and sent by road across Pakistan to the border crossings. Pakistan Saeed Shah guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Daily pill can prevent HIV infection

Groundbreaking studies suggest tablets could help partners of people with HIV protect themselves – secretly, if necessary The partners of people who have HIV can protect themselves from infection by taking a once-daily pill, two groundbreaking studies in Botswana, Kenya and Uganda have shown. The discovery could bring work to combat Aids close to a “tipping point”, experts say. Attempts to promote condom use to protect against HIV in the hardest-hit parts of the world, and particularly Africa, have hit cultural barriers and had limited success. But now it appears that men or women who know – or suspect – their partner has HIV could protect themselves, secretly if necessary. The larger study, involving 4,758 “discordant” couples (where one has HIV but the other has not) in Kenya and Uganda, led by the University of Washington’s International Clinical Research Centre, shows that those taking a single daily tablet of the Aids drug tenofovir had 62% fewer infections and those who took a pill combining tenofovir and emtricitabine had 73% fewer infections than those who took a placebo pill. The drugs have few side-effects, which is important if they are to be given to healthy individuals. Both are made by Gilead, which has licensed their manufacture to generic companies in the developing world, allowing them to produce cheap copies – so this is a relatively inexpensive intervention. “This study demonstrates that antiretrovirals are a highly potent and fundamental cornerstone for HIV prevention and should become an integral part of global efforts for HIV prevention,” said Dr Connie Celum, professor of global health and medicine at the university and principal investigator of the study, known as the Partners PrEP Study, which was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The second study in Botswana was conducted by the United States Centres for Disease Control. It followed 1,200 heterosexual men and women without HIV who received either a once-daily tenofovir/emtricitabine tablet or a placebo pill. The antiretroviral tablet reduced the risk of acquiring HIV infection by roughly 63% overall. “This is a major scientific breakthrough which re-confirms the essential role that antiretroviral medicine has to play in the Aids response,” said Michel Sidibé, Executive Director of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Aids (UNAids). “These studies could help us to reach the tipping point in the HIV epidemic.” The news follows hard on the heels of another very significant finding – that people with HIV who are taking combinations of antiretroviral drugs not only stay healthy themselves but are unlikely to infect their partner. The two pieces of research give a massive boost to the cause of rolling out more Aids drugs and treating people at the earliest stage of their illness. “Effective new HIV prevention tools are urgently needed, and these studies could have enormous impact in preventing heterosexual transmission,” said Dr Margaret Chan, WHO’s director general. “WHO will be working with countries to use the new findings to protect more men and women from HIV infection.” Aids and HIV Health HIV infection Sexual health Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Dick Morris: Bachmann and Palin are an Existential Threat to the Democratic Party

Click here to view this media I don’t know what Dick Morris was smoking before he came on Bill O’Reilly’s show this Wednesday, but maybe he should be sharing it. After being asked about some poll numbers for the GOP primary race and Bill-O asking him to conduct one next week where he asks who’s responsible for “the giant debt America has”, as though O’Reilly doens’t already know if was George W. Bush and Republicans that busted our budget after Bill Clinton left surpluses, Morris decides to chime in with some of his infinite wisdom on Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin. MORRIS: They are an existential threat to the Democratic Party, because the Democratic Party is essentially based on women; women and minorities. And therefore when they meet a conservative Republican woman, that threatens them in a way that a man never can. And that’s why they are so vitriolic against both of them. O’REILLY: Yeah, you’ve got the gender politics going on in there. Yeah, that’s the ticket Dick. Palin and Bachmann are about as much of “an existential threat to the Democratic Party” because they are women as Herman Cain is because he’s black. Dick Morris apparently thinks that Democratic female voters have brains the size of peas if they’d vote for either of those know-nothings just because they’re women. Granted you may always get a few outliers out there that would vote for them because they’re women, but if he thinks it would be some kind of serious threat that Democratic women would leave in vast numbers because a couple of women, one of whom is not even a nominee yet, are running (or maybe not) for president, he’s deluding himself, or more likely, just trying to delude the people who watch O’Reilly’s show and take it seriously. And they’re not being treated in a “vitriolic” manner because they’re women. They’re being treated in a “vitriolic” manner because they’re both unqualified to be president. But that won’t stop Dick Morris from playing the victim card for both of them.

Continue reading …
Britain suspends aid to Malawi

The UK government will withhold £19m of aid to Malawi because of failures in economic management Britain has indefinitely suspended part of its aid programme, worth £19m, for Malawi over the country’s repeated failure to address concerns over economic management and governance. The money is used for general budget support, which helps governments deliver their own national strategies for poverty reduction against an agreed set of targets. The UK’s Department for International Development (DfID) said the decision is in line with international concern over Malawi’s current position. The World Bank, the EU, the African Development Bank, Germany and Norway have all suspended or ended general budget support to Malawi. “The UK provides development assistance in order to help communities lift themselves out of grinding poverty, whether that’s through getting children into school, ensuring women survive childbirth or helping farmers grow enough food to feed their families and communities,” said Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary. “But poor people in Malawi and British taxpayers alike have been let down. In these circumstances I cannot justify the provision of general budget support for Malawi.” DfID said demonstrations in Malawi have been suppressed, civil society organisations intimidated and an injunctions bill passed that would make it easier for the government to place restrictions on opponents without legal challenge. The department, which has made aid effectiveness a priority, also expressed concern over Malawi’s overvalued exchange rate, which has created chronic foreign exchange shortages and which has badly hit the Malawian private sector. “There are now daily fuel queues, tobacco exports have deteriorated and Malawi is off-track with its IMF programme,” said DfID. Britain – Malawi’s main bilateral donor – is expected to spend £90m on aid on the landlocked country this year and an average of £93m a year in Malawi until 2015. The largest portion of Britain’s aid – 39% – goes on health . Malawi has enjoyed economic growth of about 7% in the last five years, with a peak of 9.7% in 2008, thanks to several bumper tobacco harvests. But Malawi remains one of Africa’s poorest countries, with 72% of Malawians on less than $2 a day. The decision to suspend aid for general budget support comes at a time of rocky relations between Britain and Malawi. In April, the former British colony expelled the British ambassador after he called the Malawian government autocratic in a leaked diplomatic cable. Fergus Cochrane-Dyet was quoted in a leaked message to London describing Malawi’s president Bingu wa Mutharika as “ever more autocratic and intolerant of criticism”. Cochrane-Dyet wrote to the foreign secretary, William Hague, saying that in Malawi the “governance situation continues to deteriorate in terms of media freedom, freedom of speech and minority rights”. The ambassador was summoned to Malawi’s foreign ministry in Lilongwe and ordered to leave the country within days. At the time, the Foreign Office insisted that declaring its man “persona non grata” would be unacceptable and warned that any such action would have “consequences”. Britain cut aid to Malawi by £3m last year after the purchase of a presidential jet that cost more than £8m. British officials said they had concerns about the purchase given the impoverished state of the nation and the fact that it relies on donor support for up to 40% of its development budget and the salaries of its 169,000 civil servants. Mutharika defended the new jet, saying it was cheaper to run it than hire an aircraft each time he wanted to travel abroad. Experts said the aid decision will hit the country hard at a time when it is short of foreign exchange and experiencing serious energy shortages. The country’s sole electricity provider, Electricity Supply Commission of Malawi (Escom), recently announced planned power cuts in its ageing power system that will see the whole of Malawi in darkness every day from 4pm to 10pm for the rest of this year. Aid Malawi Africa Mark Tran guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …