Liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Friday denounced the “centrist cop-out” of balance. Krugman specifically singled out the Associated Press for not exclusively blaming the ongoing debt ceiling impasse on the Republican Party. Complaining about too much fairness, he derided his journalistic colleagues, “But making nebulous calls for centrism, like writing news reports that always place equal blame on both parties, is a big cop-out — a cop-out that only encourages more bad behavior. The problem with American politics right now is Republican extremism , and if you’re not willing to say that, you’re helping make that problem worse .”
Continue reading …Liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman on Friday denounced the “centrist cop-out” of balance. Krugman specifically singled out the Associated Press for not exclusively blaming the ongoing debt ceiling impasse on the Republican Party. Complaining about too much fairness, he derided his journalistic colleagues, “But making nebulous calls for centrism, like writing news reports that always place equal blame on both parties, is a big cop-out — a cop-out that only encourages more bad behavior. The problem with American politics right now is Republican extremism , and if you’re not willing to say that, you’re helping make that problem worse .”
Continue reading …Judge describes Bilal Zaheer Ahmad as a viper in our midst before jailing him for 12 years for threats on websites An IT graduate who wrote messages on an Islamic extremist website calling on Muslims to “raise the knife of jihad” and attack and kill British MPs who voted in favour of the war in Iraq has been jailed for 12 years. Bilal Zaheer Ahmad, 24, posted the threats on the US-based RevolutionMuslim.com website with a full list of all MPs who had voted in the House of Commons in favour of the war and links providing personal contact details. He called on them to emulate Roshonara Choudhry , who had attempted to murder the Labour MP Stephen Timms with a knife at his East Ham constituency surgery six months previously, Bristol crown court heard. Ahmad, who worked for an insurance company in Telford, Shropshire, also posted a link to the Tesco website listing cheap knives, urging would-be fanatics to use them to carry out attacks. Jailing him for 12 years, with an additional five years’ extended period on licence, Mr Justice Royce said: “You became a viper in our midst willing to go as far as possible to strike at the heart of our system.” Ahmad, who holds British and Pakistani passports, had purported to be a British citizen, said Royce. “But what you stand for is totally alien to what we stand for in our country.” He added that his views were “corrosively dangerous”. “It’s important MPs can hold constituency surgeries without the threat of someone pulling out a knife and trying to kill them. You were intent on striking at the heart of our democracy and if our politicians are to be at risk from those like you, then the message must go out loud and clear that this country will not tolerate such threats to its democratic processes.” Ahmad posted his threat on 3 November, the day after Choudhry, a 21-year-old university student, was jailed for life for the knife attack on Timms in May last year. She stabbed him twice with a six-inch knife, damaging his liver and perforating his stomach. She later said she had been influenced by the radical sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, a Yemen-based preacher and al-Qaida leader. Police arrested Ahmad, at the time living in Dunstall, Wolverhampton, on 10
Continue reading …Articles on victim’s landlord a ‘risk to justice’, judges rule as eight national newspapers pay libel damages The Sun and the Daily Mirror were found guilty of contempt of court for publishing a series of “extreme” articles about a suspect who had been arrested by police investigating the murder of the landscape architect Joanna Yeates. The Daily Mirror was fined £50,000 and the Sun £18,000 after the high court ruled that the papers posed a “substantial risk” to the course of justice in their reporting on the arrest of Christopher Jefferies, Yeates’s landlord, who was later released without charge and was entirely innocent of any involvement. The Daily Mirror fine is the biggest against a British newspaper for contempt since 2004, when the Daily Star was fined £60,000 for revealing the identities of two Premiership footballers at the centre of high-profile gang rape allegations. In a separate legal action eight national newspapers, including the Daily Mirror and Sun, collectively paid six-figure libel damages to Jefferies following allegations made about him in January, when the police hunt for Yeates’s killer was at
Continue reading …Click here to view this media So with a few tweaks in language and a promise to do the unthinkable, Boehner may have gotten permission from his Televangelists to pass his bill. The House reconvenes at 2PM EST. TPM: Practically Delusional To secure enough votes from his own members for his plan, Speaker Boehner is amending it to basically turn it into Cut, Cap, and Balance Lite. Here’s the key new provision that is apparently going to win enough GOP votes to pass the bill: The debt ceiling would be raised immediately but not by enough to get the government through next year. To get the second debt ceiling increase, House Republicans want a balanced budget constitutional amendment to pass both chambers first and be referred to the states. Never going to happen, but that’s where we are. It makes you wonder if there’s any compromise plan that can get through this House. That’s why, even though my gut says there’s no way the U.S. is stupid enough to default, I still can’t see a clear, viable way out of this. Paul Ryan admits on FOX that passing a Balanced Budget Amendment is a pipe dream: RYAN: What I never really agreed with is the idea that we would expect Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to deliver 40 [and] 15 votes from Democrats for our version of the Balanced Budget Amendment. You know, I just never thought that was realistic, to demand Democrats vote against their conscious for our version of the Balanced Budget Amendment. So I just never thought that would work . Ryan’s political calculus is of course accurate, but it’s noteworthy coming from the GOP’s chief number cruncher and the staunchly conservative author of the Medicare-ending Republican budget. The current GOP version of the BBA is a disastrous idea that even leading conservatives have rejected . There’s no way it could achieve the two-thirds majority needed in both houses of Congress to pass, let alone before the Aug. 2 deadline to raise the debt limit. But as House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said yesterday, many members of own caucus are willing to let the deadline pass in the hope that the ensuing economic “chaos” would force Democrats to switch their votes. The Tea Party compromise is to try and change the Constitution. Some Originalists , huh? This will never happen. Meanwhile Harry Reid tells Republicans they have until Midnight at the Oasis to get something done. You have until midnight. That’s the message Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has conveyed to Senate Republicans. If they want any further input on his debt limit bill, they need to speak up by then. Otherwise, he’ll touch off a process that could result in passage of his plan on the afternoon of August 2. “I have invited Sen. McConnell to sit down with me and to negotiate in good faith, knowing the clock is running down. I hope he will accept my offer,” Reid said on the Senate floor Friday. “I know the Senate compromise bill Democrats have offered is not perfect in Republican’ eyes. Nor is it perfect for Democrats.” Chuck Todd was on with Andrea Mitchell and blamed the Tea Party Caucus for holding up the debt ceiling and for much of this chaos although he wouldn’t come out and name them. He said something like one segment of one party is mucking it all up. Typical Villager double speak.
Continue reading …Yesterday on “The Fix”, a politics blog of the Washington Post, Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake wrote “Five Members to watch in the House debt ceiling vote.”
Continue reading …Couple decide against lucrative magazine deal for relatively small ceremony to be held at Edinburgh’s Canongate Kirk As a “private family occasion”, even one closing part of Edinburgh and costing taxpayers up to £500,000 in security, Saturday’s royal wedding is likely to reveal only the briefest public glimpses of bride and groom, Zara Phillips and Mike Tindall. Unlike the wedding, beamed across the globe three months ago, international TV anchors are not camping outside Canongate Kirk on the Royal Mile, as the Queen’s eldest granddaughter and 13th in line, marries the England rugby captain. “There doesn’t seem to be any American interest,” said Dickie Arbiter, formerly palace press officer now a royal pundit for Sky News. “Zara’s so far down the pecking order. She’s a Miss, not a princess. And Americans just don’t get rugby!” And unlike another “private family occasion”, the 2008 wedding of Phillips’s brother, Peter, to Autumn Kelly, there will be no pictures of the royals – such as Sophie Wessex, “getting it down” on the dancefloor – appearing in a £500,000 Hello! magazine exclusive deal. At the time some newspapers lambasted the “vulgarity” of it all, while simultaneously drooling over the magazine’s sales-boosting shots of princes William and Harry’s then girlfriends, Kate Middleton and Chelsy Davy, across 20 glossy pages. No such blatant commercialisation this time: though reports that the Queen had stamped a regal foot and forbidden her granddaughter from similarly cashing in seem wide of the mark. Phillips and Tindall made it plain from the moment of their engagement that there would be no magazine deal, one impeccably placed source stressed. “I’m not surprised,” said Joe Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine. “After all that damage, Peter Phillips will forever be known as the chap who sold his wedding to Hello! for half-a-million and upset the rest of the family. “Saturday’s going to be very different. Not sure what we’ll be allowed to see,
Continue reading …London mayor joins mounting opposition to proposed £32bn route linking London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds Boris Johnson, the London mayor, has become embroiled in a new row with David Cameron after government sources accused him of “overstepping the mark” by attacking plans for the £32bn north-south high-speed rail link. The prime minister has identified the 250mph route linking London to Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester as a potential vote winner in the north but Johnson has joined mounting opposition. In his submission to a public consultation on the High Speed Two (HS2) project, Johnson said aspects of the route were unacceptable while warning that it did not solve UK airport capacity problems. He said: “These proposals need to give consideration to their impact on residents in London. There is a great case for investing in a high-speed rail network but that must also be supported by the infrastructure to handle the extra passengers.” Johnson is calling for a new tube link at Euston station, the project’s proposed London terminus, amid fears that existing lines will be flooded with passengers. A senior government source said Johnson, whose interventions on spending cuts and a ban on airport expansion have angered the cabinet, had “overstepped the line in his opposition to HS2.” It is understood that Philip Hammond, the transport secretary, has dismissed Johnson’s request for more investment in London’s transport, on top of funding for the £16bn Crossrail project and a multibillion-pound tube upgrade. The source said: “Philip Hammond thinks high-speed rail is crucial for bridging the north-south divide. London did very well in the spending settlement and there is no case for the capital having even more major transport projects.” Rail companies have been asked to contribute £10,000 each to a pro-HS2 campaign amid fears the government will be outgunned by a well-funded opposition. The “no” camp is strongest in the home counties, where residents are angry about the London-to-Birmingham phase, which is due to open in 2026. The newly established Campaign for High Speed Rail accused Johnson of “hijacking” a national policy to secure more funding for London. “The government is busy trying to address the north-south divide, so it’s outrageous that Boris is trying to hijack this progress purely to secure more transport spending for London,” said Professor David Begg, the group’s director. “London already receives more transport spending per resident than anywhere else in the country, and the HS2 scheme as it stands will benefit London hugely in terms of jobs and transport infrastructure.” Once the London-to-Birmingham route is completed, a Y-shaped extension opening in 2032 will take the line to Manchester and Leeds. The full route is forecast to produce a £44bn boost to the UK economy with the first phase generating an estimated 40,000 jobs, as well as freeing up capacity on the west coast rail line for more commuter and freight services. However, opponents argue that the line will scar the landscape of Buckinghamshire, Warwickshire and Northamptonshire as well as the Chiltern Hills – all home to key Conservative constituencies. The no campaign also believes that taxpayer funds would be better spent on a cheaper upgrade of the rail network. Rail transport Transport Boris Johnson David Cameron Conservatives Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Activists predict street demonstrations rather than quiet reflection will mark the Islamic holy month this year It is usually the month of reflection and prayer, laying low in the heat of the day, before gathering to watch soap operas and feast as dusk falls. But this year Ramadan is anticipated in Syria for different reasons: as an opportunity to intensify protests against Bashar al-Assad, despite fears the regime may fight back even harder. Activists intend to exploit the increased daily attendance at mosques, which have over the past five months acted as gathering points for protests following Friday prayers. Many who do not regularly attend mosque do so during Ramadan, when prayers are believed to carry more weight that at other times of year. “It’s become a cliche to say it will be like Friday every day as people gather for prayer, but it will be,” said a former political prisoner who has strong links to the Sunni community, speaking in his house in Damascus. “Pressure on the regime will increase from more frequent protests and more people coming out.” On Friday, the last before Ramadan, at least nine people were killed as thousands defied a heavy security presence to take to the streets, including in the eastern city of Deir Ezzor, where deaths were reported earlier in the week. Ramadan, the lunar month when people fast in remembrance of the time when the first verses of the Qur’an were passed to the prophet Muhammad, is usually a quiet time. Business grinds to a halt, with people struggling to get through the heat of the day without water. But they do go to the mosque more often, especially for tarawih , the the special nightly
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Laura Ingraham has been a big Tea Party supporter and proponent of the position that Republicans should not pass a debt ceiling bill that is a short-term/mini-deal or else it should be viewed as unserious . Talking to Newsmax on July 6th, she said this: Conservative radio talk show host Laura Ingraham tells Newsmax that Republicans should stand firm against a “mini-deal” that would raise the debt ceiling with only “cosmetic cuts” in federal spending. She also says Washington legislators who would consider such a settlement show that they are “completely unserious” about dealing with the federal debt and “saving America.” As much as I disliked Obama’s Grand Bargain idea, it supposedly cut $4 trillion out of the deficit. That’s not small potatoes. Biden’s group also had massive spending cuts along with closing some tax loopholes and Harry Reid’s plan, which should be considered a small deal because it only lasts until after the 2012 election, is a spending-cuts-only bill. Who has the worst mini deal of all? John Boehner. Guess which bill Laura Ingraham is supporting now after vehemently opposing a mini-deal? John Boehner’s. She said so while she was guest-hosting Bill O’Reilly’s show yesterday. Bill is in LA doing PR and wound up calling in to give his analysis since Boehner’s bill couldn’t even get voted on Thursday. And what did Bill do? He called out Ingraham because she has been on The Factor toeing the Tea Party line all along. But now she’s falling in line with the rest of the GOP hierarchy. (Rough transcript) O’Reilly: First of all it was a good interview with the guys up top, but I noticed a little tone change from your posture last week where I was anchoring and you were the interview subject and now you’re the anchor..ummm. I saw a little softening of the hard line position. Did I pick that up wrong? Have you changed a little bit? Ingraham: No, no I don’t think you’re picking it up correctly. My point now is that they’ve gotten the best deal they can get with the leverage that they’ve exercised. If the Tea Party just agreed to several days ago which was my point last week then they wouldn’t have gotten the deal right now. O’Reilly: You think that now the Tea Party should say, OK, we’re going to go with Boehner. Ingraham: I think the Tea Party, yes, absolutely because this is the best deal they’re going to get . Can you trust anything she says? That’s not what Ingraham’s been saying all along. Laura grilled Rep. Steve King later in the show for saying that the Tea Party should wait until after the deadline has passed so then the ,arkets can collapse and they can get the Cup, Cap and Balanced budget amendment passed easily. She was very hostile to that idea, literally calling him crazy if he thought that was remotely realistic.
Continue reading …