Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1698)

Today's Supreme Court ruling in Snyder v. Phelps is proving to be yet another occasion for the media to falsely describe the homosexuality-fixated Westboro Baptist Church as a “fundamentalist” congregation. The Associated Press , MSNBC and NPR.org have been among the news outlets using that tag for the Topeka, Kansas, organization that protests funerals of soliders, celebrating their deaths by claiming God killed them because he hates “fags.” But the AP's own style manual strongly cautions against the use of the term “fundamentalist,” noting that the term “fundamentalist has to a large extent taken on pejorative connotations except when applied to groups that stress strict, literal interpretations of Scripture and separation from other Christians.” “In general,” the AP manual adds, “do not use [the term] fundamentalist unless a group applies the word to itself.” At time of publication, Westboro's website was unavailable, but a cached version of its FAQ page on Google yielded no description of WBC as “fundamentalist.” Here's how the church describes itself: The Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) of Topeka, Kansas, is an Old School (or, Primitive) Baptist Church. We adhere to the teachings of the Bible, preach against all form of sin (e.g., fornication, adultery [including divorce and remarriage], sodomy), and insist that the sovereignty of God and the doctrines of grace be taught and expounded publicly to all men. These doctrines of grace were well summed up by John Calvin in his 5 points of Calvinism: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. Although these doctrines are almost universally hated today, they were once loved and believed. Even though the Arminian lies that “God loves everyone” and “Jesus died for everyone” are being taught from nearly every pulpit in this generation, this hasn't always been the case. If you are in a church that supposedly believes the Bible, and you are hearing these lies, then your church doesn't teach what the Bible teaches. If you care about your never-dying soul, you will carefully read every word of this web site, along with the entire Bible. Of course, there are plenty of Christian churches that do favor “strict, literal interpretations of Scripture” that denounce Westboro Baptist, such as the Primitive Baptists, who insist they have nothing in common with WBC. From PrimitiveBaptist.info (emphasis mine): PB-Online and the Primitive Baptist Church do not recognize the ministry of “pastor” Fred Phelps, nor do we have fellowship with the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas, which styles itself as an Old School (or Primitive) Baptist Church. We find the actions of these people to be deplorable and against the very Scriptures they claim to believe. Let it be firmly noted that the Primitive Baptists do not and will not endorse, condone or support the base actions of this group.

Continue reading …
Media Boycott of Wisconsin Assemblyman Telling Assemblywoman ‘You Are F–king Dead’ Continues

UPDATE AT END OF POST: Laura Ingraham interviews Assemblywoman Litjens. As NewsBusters reported Tuesday, a Wisconsin Democrat Assemblyman vulgarly assaulted a Republican Assemblywoman last week disgracefully saying to her after a procedural on the state's budget, “You are f–king dead!” Although the story was first broken by a Wisconsin radio station at 12:53 PM Monday, America's supposedly civility-minded media have almost completely boycotted it with the following exceptions: The Associated Press State & Local wire published a 153 word piece on the matter at 12:53 PM Tuesday that was quite matter of fact and inconsequential Fox News's Bill Hemmer interviewed Assemblywoman Michelle Litjens (R-Wis.) concerning the assault Tuesday Litjens was interviewed by a number of conservative talk radio hosts Tuesday According to LexisNexis and Google news searches, as far as major media are concerned, that's it. Not one major newspaper outside of Wisconsin thought this newsworthy. The Associated Press didn't run a national piece on it. All of the television networks besides Fox completely ignored it as did NPR. In fairness, MSNBC does not transcribe its shows outside of extended prime time, and someone suggested to me Tuesday afternoon that the network had made some mention of it. I can't prove or disprove that; there appears to be nothing about this at MSNBC.com. As I asked Tuesday, just imagine if the woman that was vulgarly assaulted was a Democrat and the man on the giving end was a Republican. Would the coverage have been different? It seems a metaphysical certitude the answer is a resounding “Yes,” and that not only would this story have lead every evening television news broadcast Monday as well as morning shows Tuesday, it also would have made front page headlines Tuesday as well as been reported every hour on the hour by CNN and MSNBC. It also seems likely the National Organization for Women would have already called for Hintz's resignation, with leading Democrat figures including possibly the President himself condemning his behavior calling on this to be a teachable moment for the nation. Can anyone say “Beer summit?” Instead, crickets. What does this tell Americans? Since August 29, 2008, the day Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was introduced to America, we've learned that sexist attacks on Republican women are not only acceptable but are to be condoned and rewarded. Since that day, we've seen supposedly feminist liberal media members excoriate female GOPers such as Minnesota's Michele Bachmann, Delaware's Christine O'Donnell, and Nevada's Sharron Angle in a way that they would never consider doing to a Democrat woman. Now, with this disgusting assault being almost totally boycotted by America's media, we learn that as far as the press are concerned, it's okay for male Democrat officials to treat their female colleagues in such a deplorable manner as long as they are Republicans. By their silence, every media outlet in this country that did not report this incident has implicitly condoned what Hintz did, and should be thoroughly ashamed. Alas, this is how far so-called journalists are willing to go to defeat Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's plan to balance his state's budget. Makes you weep for the future, doesn't it? For those interested, here's Hemmer's Tuesday interview with Litjens: Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com *****Update: As bonus coverage, here's Laura Ingraham's interview with Litjens also from Tuesday:

Continue reading …

Crisis in Dairyland – Odor in the Capitol Building Crisis in Dairyland – Angry Curds Crisis in Dairyland – Message for Teachers Since the regular networks have done such a piss poor job of covering what has been going on in Wisconsin and explaining it, The Daily Show devotes most of their show to the issue and does more in a few minutes, really getting to the heart of the matter than the rest of them have done in weeks of false equivalences and simplifications.

Continue reading …
MSNBC’s Matthews, O’Donnell, Schultz and Uygur Cherry-pick Huckabee to Make Him a Birther

Four of MSNBC's extended prime time hosts on Tuesday cherry-picked something Mike Huckabee said on Steve Malzberg's radio show in order to depict the possible Republican presidential candidate as a birther. Before getting to their highly unprofessional snippets, implications, and conclusions, here's what the former Arkansas governor actually said Monday (videos follow with transcripts and commentary): STEVE MALZBERG, HOST: I mean, don’t you see black liberation theology as a, as something that, that was fair to bring up as McCain did not, and if you were to run against Barack Obama, would you consider Rev. Wright and all those years in the church as fair game or not? MIKE HUCKABEE, FORMER ARKANSAS GOVERNOR: I would spend more time asking Barack Obama whether he believed in black liberation theology rather than Rev. Wright did. I really want to know, does he believe that salvation is individual or is it corporate and grouped. I’m very frankly delighted that we saw an African-American elected to the presidency. I just wish it had not been someone that was so leftist that he just, world views are just completely opposite of that of any American president. I take great issue with virtually every position Barack Obama takes as a president. In my book, I mean there not, there’s some sharp elbows thrown, but not at him, but at his positions, because I think his actions as president are hurting this country, and hurting our future. I have no hesitancy in taking him on for his domestic policy, his economic policy, his policy toward national security or our role as Americans. One of the comments I make, Steve, in the book that I think sums up my view of his foreign policy is that Teddy Roosevelt said, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” His is, “Make apologies and throw away the stick.” And it’s hurting this country, and he said that we shouldn’t have any country fear us. I take great exception. I think we ought to have a military that everybody in this world is scared to death of. MALZBERG: So you would be different than McCain in many ways. You would confront him, especially now since you have four years of policy to scrutinize, correct? HUCKABEE: Absolutely. MALZBERG: Alright, one more for you. HUCKABEE: I think that’s the key is to go, go head to head and show the clarity of differences between the two. MALZBERG: One more for you, well, two more, the second one will be short. Don't you think it's fair also to ask him – I know your stance on this – “How come we don't have a health record, we don't have a college record, we don't have a birth cer – why Mr. Obama did you spend millions of dollars in courts all over this country to defend against having to present a birth certificate.” It's one thing to say, I've — you've seen it, goodbye. But why go to court and send lawyers to defend against having to show it? Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. What I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. When he gave the bust back to the Brits — MALZBERG: Of Winston Churchill. HUCKABEE: The bust of Winston Churchill, a great insult to the British. But then if you think about it, his perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau Revolution in Kenya is very different than ours because he probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather. MALZBERG: Oh, he despised the West, he despises the Brits, and I think he could take it all out on Israel, and that’s why he despises Israel. He’s not too thrilled with our history either. But let me just try to get an answer from you. Would you say to him or at least ask him in a debate, “Why did you go to court and spend millions of dollars on lawyers to prevent from having to show your birth certificate? If you have one and it’s there, why not show it?” HUCKABEE: The only reason I'm not as confident that there's something about the birth certificate, Steve, is because I know the Clintons well, and believe me, they have lots of investigators out on him, and I'm convinced if there was anything that they could have found on that, they would have found it, and I promise they would have used it. To be sure, Huckabee was 100 percent wrong about Obama having lived in Kenya. A spokesman Tuesday said the former governor misspoke. However, that didn't prevent the resulting firestorm. At 1:26 PM, the shills at Media Matters posted a video and transcript of much of Huckabee's relevant comments to Malzberg under the headline ” Huckabee: Obama Grew Up 'In Kenya .'” Not at all surprising, the George Soros-funded, far-left organization concluded from Huckabee's comments that he was claiming Obama wasn't born in Hawaii although he never said that: PolitiFact has noted that there “is not one shred of evidence to disprove PolitiFact's conclusion that the candidate's name is Barack Hussein Obama, or to support allegations that the birth certificate he released isn't authentic.” As this disgraceful organization's next step is typically to do an e-mail blast of their baseless conclusions, it was not at all surprising that by 3:13 PM, the New York Times Caucus Blog had bitten and bitten hard with a piece entitled ” Huckabee Questions Obama's Birth Certificate “: Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas and a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012, said on Monday that he would “love to know more” about where President Obama was born and claimed — falsely — that Mr. Obama was raised in Kenya. Actually, that's not at all what Huckabee said. In response to a lengthy question from Malzberg in the middle of a lengthy discussion about Obama, when asked, “Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man,” the former governor said, “I would love to know more.” But the genie was now fully out of the bottle, and left-wing websites were running with this ball like a wide receiver in the open field seeing nothing but the end zone in front of him. Consider that at press time, a Google search of “Huckabee, Obama, Kenya” produced 206,000 results. Dutifully looking to take down any potential presidential threat to the object of their affection in the upcoming elections, the shills at MSNBC were quite willing to similarly cherry-pick Huckabee's comments in order to depict him as a birther: CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Back to HARDBALL. Time for the “Sideshow.” First up: We know a lot of Republicans wrongly believe that President Obama was born and raised in Kenya, over in Africa. Guess who recently joined the birther chorus? Mike Huckabee. Here’s Huck on radio yesterday talking about the president. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) MALZBERG: Don’t you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. But what I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. (END AUDIO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Well, the reality, of course, is President Obama grew up in Hawaii, one of the states of the union, and Indonesia, when he had a stepfather there. In fact, he didn’t even visit Kenya in his entire youth ever. Huckabee’s spokesperson, by the way, finally backpedaled late today, saying his boss simply misspoke. Yes, he was pandering to that radio guy. Next up was the totally hapless and unwatchable Cenk Uygur: CENK UYGUR, HOST: Alright, is Mike Huckabee a birther? During an appearance on the Steve Malzberg radio show, the host was trying to keep the ridiculous conservative theory alive. He wanted to know why President Obama spent millions in court defending against having to present a birth certificate and all that same nonsense. Now here's a response. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) MALZBERG: Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. What I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. When he gave the bust back to the Brits — MALZBERG: Of Winston Churchill. HUCKABEE: The bust of Winston Churchill, a great insult to the British. But then if you think about it, his perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau Revolution in Kenya is very different than ours because he probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather. (END AUDIO CLIP) UYGUR: Now there he said that Obama grew up in Kenya not once but twice. In reality of course President Obama was born in Hawaii and was raised in Hawaii. He did go to Indonesia for some years. Oh my God, wait until they get a load of that. And by the way, just in case you’re keeping track, the number of years that President Obama lived in Kenya would be zero. A spokesman for Huckabee commented today saying, “It was nothing more than a misstatement. Of course, we meant that he grew up in Uganda.” Okay, he didn't say that last part, but you know they were thinking it. At 7PM was a replay of “Hardball” followed by “The Last Word”: LAWRENCE O’DONNELL, HOST: Time for tonight's Rewrite. If you think of Mike Huckabee as a genial, guitar playing, singing former governor of Arkansas who meets the basic integrity standards typical of former governors of Arkansas, you will be shocked, absolutely shocked by what he said yesterday. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) MALZBERG: Why Mr. Obama did you spend millions of dollars in courts all over this country to defend against having to present a birth certificate. It's one thing to say, I've — you've seen it, goodbye. But why go to court and send lawyers to defend against having to show it? Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. What I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. (END AUDIO CLIP) O’DONNELL: Well, maybe it would be if he grew up in Kenya, but Barack Obama did not grow up in Kenya! (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) HUCKABEE: His perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather. (END AUDIO CLIP) O’DONNELL: No, no, no, no, no. He did not grow up in Kenya. Yes, he did have a Kenyan father and grandfather, but he did not grow up there. This is what we know. This is what is beyond dispute. Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. He lived in the United States until he was six. His mother moved to Indonesia, Indonesia, where Barack Obama went to school from ages six to ten. At age ten, he moved back to Hawaii where he lived until he went off to college in California, not Kenya, California. Huckabee refers to Obama growing up in Kenya as, quote, “The one thing I do know.” If that is the one thing that Mike Huckabee knows, then Huckabee knows less than nothing. That would presumably hold for governance. What does that mean Huckabee knows about Social Security? What does Huckabee know about Medicare? What does Huckabee know about the defense budget? What does Huckabee know about what we should do next in Libya? What does Huckabee know about anything other than how to lose weight? As the pressure mounted today on Huckabee for lying about where the President grew up, Huckabee’s handlers issued the lamest possible press release in reaction to getting caught in an outright lie. It was, quote, “Gov. Huckabee simply misspoke.” Huckabee wants to leave it at that because he knows this particular brand of misspeaking is very, very useful for inspiring support of the 51 percent, 51 percent of national Republican primary voters who believe that Barack Obama is not a citizen of the United States. Mike Huckabee desperately wants every one of their votes if he's going to run for president next year. In his ugly pursuit of those votes he has now fallen below the already low standard for integrity that we have come to expect from former governors of Arkansas. That last sentence of course was a slam on Bill Clinton, which is interesting considering the man setting the “low standard for integrity that we have come to expect from former governors of Arkansas” was honored last week by MSNBC in a love letter from Chris Matthews called “President of the World.” More importantly, all three of these MSNBC hosts up to this point dishonestly omitted the beginning of Malzberg's relevant question, “Don't you think it's fair also to ask him – I know your stance on this – 'How come we don't have a health record, we don't have a college record?'” Malzberg wasn't just talking to Huckabee about the birther issue, but also other questions media members largely ignored during the 2008 campaign. As such, when he asked, “Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man,” it wasn't just about where he was born. Furthermore, not one of the three hosts played the part of the Malzberg interview when Huckabee disavowed birthers altogether: HUCKABEE: The only reason I'm not as confident that there's something about the birth certificate, Steve, is because I know the Clintons well, and believe me, they have lots of investigators out on him, and I'm convinced if there was anything that they could have found on that, they would have found it, and I promise they would have used it. Indeed. Yet Matthews, O'Donnell, and Uygur didn't play this part of Malzberg's interview with Huckabee, and neither did Ed Schultz: ED SCHULTZ, HOST: Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee wants to have his cake and eat it, too, but the only thing is he put his foot in his mouth today. Now Media Matters heard his appearance with conservative radio talk show host on the low-rated Steve Malzberg show. Here’s Huckabee’s response to questions about the President’s citizenship. Notice Schultz is such an idiot that he doesn't know the interview he was playing happened Monday. But I digress: (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) MALZBERG: Don't you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. What I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. (END AUDIO CLIP) SCHULTZ: So, Mike Huckabee says President Obama grew up in Kenya even though the President’s own biography says he grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia. Maybe Huckabee just misspoke. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) HUCKABEE: His perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau Revolution in Kenya is very different than ours because he probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather. (END AUDIO CLIP) SCHULTZ: Hmmm, hmmm. Interesting. Huckabee tried to clarify these statements on his Huck PAC website saying, “I simply misspoke when I alluded to President Obama growing up in ‘Kenya’ and meant to say Indonesia.” Actually, here was Huckabee's complete statement concerning this matter: On Monday, while on Steve Malzberg's radio show on New York's WOR Radio, I was asked about the President Obama's birth certificate issue. In my answer, I simply misspoke when I alluded to President Obama growing up in 'Kenya' and meant to say Indonesia. As I have stated on page 1 of my new book 'A Simple Government' and in numerous interviews with dozens of reporters – I don't believe there is an issue with Barack Obama's birth certificate. However, I do believe there are serious issues with the President's policies, and I have been openly opposed to the President's world view. I'm not surprised the NY Times chose to sensationalize this story. In fact, the New York Times, the AP, and other news organizations ran with the “sensationalized story” despite being specifically told by Steve Malzberg himself that they were incorrect in their assessment of the sound bite. You just can't help but laugh when my simple slip of the tongue, becomes a huge story – and a certain Presidential candidate claiming to visit all 57 states, gets widely ignored. More on that later, but let's get back to Schultz: SCHULTZ: So he misspoke and meant Indonesia even though he said Kenya twice – you heard it! – and talked about the Mau Mau rebellion against the British in Kenya. But take a look at Huckabee’s past statements about the President of the United States. This is the first sentence of his new book. Quote: “Since Barack Obama was elected, plenty of books have been written criticizing his administration and accusing him of all sorts of things – from being a Marxist to lying about his citizenship to being a Muslim. But if you know me or you’re familiar with my commentaries on TV and radio, you know I don’t like to make politics personal.” Well, he made similar comments about birthers on “Good Morning America” last week. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) HUCKABEE: For Republicans to even be bringing it up, I think it’s a waste of energy and time. Let’s focus on the issues with which we have disagreement not on really the extraneous personal things that are immaterial. (END VIDEO CLIP) SCHULTZ: Now, you may ask, “Why didn’t Huckabee say the same thing to Steve Malzberg on the right-wing radio today?” Well here’s why. A recent poll showed 51 percent of likely Republican primary voters believe President Obama was born in another country. Of those 51 percent, Mike Huckabee is their top choice for president. So, when you ask the non-birthers in the GOP their choice, it is Mitt Romney. Huckabee has to keep the birthers happy. But he can’t win the general election by pandering to them. He hasn’t officially announced his candidacy, but make no mistake about it, Mike Huckabee is already running a couple of campaigns. So, here's Schultz's logic: Huckabee is comfortable publishing a book in which he disavows birthers, has no compunction against disavowing birthers on a broadcast television morning show that is now averaging 4.7 million viewers, but when he goes on what Schultz described as a “low-rated” radio program, he suddenly feels the need to speak differently on this issue. And this man has his own show to espouse such utter nonsense. The reality is that conservatives know Huckabee isn't a birther, so he doesn't have to pretend that he is. As Hot Air's Allahpundit wrote Tuesday: My read on this is the same as Weigel’s , that Huckabee’s not questioning Obama’s citizenship so much as mistakenly making a hash of his biography. He knows that Obama grew up abroad, but somewhere along the line, between Birther chatter about Kenya and Gingrich’s talking points about Obama’s “Kenyan, anti-colonial worldview,” he forgot that it was Indonesia where O was raised. Indeed. But such logic is inconsequential when the goal is to take down all of Obama's potential opponents next year. And this is the kind of unprofessional reporting Americans should expect from MSNBC the next 20 months as these shills do everything within their power to get the object of their affection re-elected. They're going to cherry-pick, convolute, misrepresent, and flat out lie when necessary. The folks at NBC and new owners Comcast must be so proud of the lack of integrity and journalistic malpractice now on display at this so-called news network. Interested readers are advised that Huckabee will be back on Malzberg's show Wednesday to address this issue in greater detail, and can listen to Malzberg's take on the media's pathetic response to the former Arkansas governor's comments at WOR radio's website (relevant section begins at minute 18:40).

Continue reading …
Newstalgia Reference Room – Lebanon – 1958 (Middle East Excursions Past)

enlarge U.S. Marines in Beirut, 1958 – sooner or later . . . . Click here to view this media With talk today about creating a”No-Fly Zone” over Libya in response to the continuing crisis over Gadaffi, I keep wondering how wise a move of that sort is. Historically, there has always been some sort of physical involvement with European or American forces in the region whenever a crisis looms. One of the gratifying aspects to the current situations in Tunisia and Egypt is that we purposely kept a hands-off approach to the crisis, allowing that thing called “the right of self-determination” to take hold. And even though our intentions may be pure and humanitarian, we still have a long enough history in the region to remind those on the streets that our efforts in the past have not always been the most pure and forthright. We have often arrived, but with strings attached. Many years ago it was the result of the Cold War that U.S. aid to those regions came flooding in because it was feared the Soviet Union would jump in as well. But now we have the opportunity to do things differently for the first time perhaps ever. Case in point about our past involvements in the Middle East; here is a broadcast from the CBS Radio series Radio Beat which centers around the crisis in 1958 concerning Lebanon. At the center of the controversy was pro-Western Lebanese President Camille Chamoun who, at the time of this broadcast (June 26th, 1958) was trying to maintain an air of normalcy about the growing rebellion in his country. Howard K. Smith (CBS News): “Mister President, some aspects of the conflict are mystifying to the American public, I would like to ask you what exactly was the original cause of the trouble in Lebanon?” President Camille Chamoun (Pres. Of Lebanon): “Well, it is simply the desire of the United Arab Republic to dominate the policy of this country.” Smith: “Well, it is said that the original cause was a decision by you to try to be elected for a second term as President, is there any truth in that? Chamoun: “The election or re-election of the President in any country is simply a domestic affair. It happened in the past, that Lebanon has elected many Presidents, it has re-elected one President, and nothing happened of that kind between government and opposition. The fact that there is an armed rebellion today and that these armed rebellions has been assisted with financial support, military equipment, volunteers and terrorists coming from Egypt and Syria, is the proof that the domestic issue was only a pretext for the United Arab Republic to start this problem with the ultimate aim of dominating the policy of Lebanon.” Less than a week later, Chamoun made an urgent plea to the U.S. for military aid and we sent in the Marines. The rebellion was quashed and Chamoun remained in power for at least another month when it was politely yet firmly suggested by our State Department that Chamoun step down in order that another hand-picked candidate assume the Presidency. Granted, this was right in the middle of the Cold War and it was a popularity contest between Washington and Moscow, but these superpower interventions (no matter which ideological side of the fence) in the domestic affairs of a country are not without their paybacks. And as we’ve seen in the case of Iran, can blow up in our faces. And we react with surprise and dismay when we really have no reason to – we brought it all on ourselves. When we take on the role of World’s Policeman or dabble in Nation Building we set ourselves up to accept the blame for everything that goes wrong with the domestic inner-workings of a nation – the fault and all the blame rests on us because we insisted on buying into it. The current situation that’s brewing in Iraq is a case in point. We’ve been painted over and over in the region of the Middle East because we insist in meddling in affairs that don’t belong to us. And Lebanon in 1958 was certainly no different. Hopefully Libya in 2011 will be. Just sayin’.

Continue reading …
The Villagers Think the Peons Just Need to be ‘Brought Along’ on Social Security ‘Reform’

Click here to view this media As Digby noted, the Villagers think Americans are too dumb to make decisions . I’d say the larger problem is being exposed to too many like these two hacks that Tweety decided were somehow qualified to weigh in on Social Security “reform”. “Reform” of course meaning most of us should work until we drop dead because heaven forbid we can’t ask the rich to pay more in taxes. They’ve got way too many propagandized already into believing they should not expect Social Security to be there for them. Little wonder when this is the garbage that pollutes our airways. As for people not being willing to cut Medicare, perhaps some of these villagers ought to talk to the Republicans and their puppet masters who ran millions of dollars worth of ads in the last election demagogueing the cuts in Medicare in the health care reforms. It’s funny how that’s the one time in history that the Democrats took on one of their base’s favored programs and didn’t get any credit for it. In fact, they got crucified by the hypocritical GOP and nobody in DC said a peep. It’s not that the Village needs to “bring the public along” it’s that the public needs to stop listening to the Villagers altogether. They are a font of misinformation. Oh, and by the way, the deficit commission didn’t issue any recommendations because they couldn’t get a consensus. There’s a reason for that if the oh-so-smug and secure establishment journalists cared to look into it they’d find it’s really not painless for working people after all. Much more there so go read the rest. Transcript below the fold. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) REP. JOHN BOEHNER (R-OH): To not address entitlement programs, as in the case with the budget the president has put forward, would be an economic and moral failure. (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Wow. An economic and moral failure not to go after Social Security and Medicare? Wait until we see what happens when they do go after it. Welcome back to Hardball. While it appears there may be a deal coming to keep the United States government funded for another two weeks and open for business, avoiding a shutdown, the question remains whether Congress or the president will do something to curb the big, growing cost of programs like Social Security and Medicare. Or is it all talk and no action, for the obvious reason? Susan Molinari is a former New York congresswoman. And Jeanne Cummings is assistant manager editor at Politico. Jeanne, just in strict analytical terms, watching these folks, I wonder if anybody who wants to get elected again in Congress is willing to put their hand up and say: “I want to cut the benefits going to people on Social Security. I want to cut the health benefits. You’re not going to get dialysis for more than three months, X-many months. You’re not going to get the artificial limb reworked after seven years. You’re not going to get the following”? When it comes to the realities of cutting these programs, will any politician actually do it? JEANNE CUMMINGS: I don’t think we’re going to see that any time soon, and without a great deal of change here in Washington, Chris, for the reasons that you make clear. It’s politically very, very difficult. You have down in Florida Representative Adam (sic) West, who has actually talked — he’s a Republican, a freshman — and he’s talked more than many of them about some of the changes that would have to come to those programs. And the Democrats are immediately targeting him. And that — those are the very issues they’re using against him. MATTHEWS: Yes. CUMMINGS: So, it’s going to take a sea change. MATTHEWS: All you have to do — Paula Hawkins, remember — I’m sorry. But, remember, Paula Hawkins was a senator from down there, never did anything wrong, except she did what they told her to do. She voted to — she came out in public support of cutting for the COLAs for Social Security and got blown away. Jeremiah Denton. I think it’s the only issue, Susan — you were in the House — that you can be beaten for, just one vote. Vote to cut Social Security, vote to cut Medicare benefits to people, what happens to you? SUSAN MOLINARI (R), FORMER U.S. CONGRESSWOMAN: Well, except nobody’s talking about cutting benefits of the recipients right now. What they’re talking about is changing programs in the future. And I think… (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: But, in the end, doesn’t that do the same thing? MOLINARI: I think the Republicans are going to take that chance. Look, John Boehner has just said it. The speaker went out there and said it. Eric Cantor has said it. Paul Ryan has said, when he unveils his budget in a few weeks, there`s going to be entitlement change. Governor Christie has stood up and has staked his claim. Mitch Daniels has. I mean, you’re starting to see — and, look, it’s a different… MATTHEWS: It’s easy for Christie. He’s not doing this. He’s telling them to do it. (CROSSTALK) MOLINARI: It’s a different world now, though. MATTHEWS: OK. (CROSSTALK) MOLINARI: This is a different world. MATTHEWS: OK, Susan Molinari, I respect your judgment. Here’s the latest “USA Today” poll, Gallup poll — 61 percent of Americans oppose cutting Medicare spends — 64 percent oppose cutting Social Security spending. These are two-thirds votes. MOLINARI: I think the American people told the Republicans when they elected in the majority that they wanted this deficit to come under control and that they wanted a little sanity and some validity. MATTHEWS: I agree with all that. MOLINARI: We’re starting to see this with the C.R. We’re starting to see this with what the new Republican budget is going to do. I think you’re going to be surprised by the leadership that the Republican Party is going to show. And I think the American people are going to present them with reelection at the polls for showing that kind of leadership. I think what the last election about — was leadership. MATTHEWS: Every time, Susan — or, Jeanne, every time we poll people — and I did this back in, I think, 1971, working for a senator from Utah. You poll people and you ask them what they would like to see government cut, they say foreign aid and general government expenses. They want to see more money on education. They don’t want any cuts in Social Security or anything like it. If you ask them, do they want to see government waste cut, they don’t want real cuts. For example, I was just out doing something for Alzheimer’s this past week out in Las Vegas, trying to raise awareness for the big group out there that is working on research. Imagine telling people who have an Alzheimer’s victim in their house and they’re a caregiver — oh by the way, we’re cutting spending on research that you’re going to face another 20 or 30 years of Alzheimer’s hell in this country because we can’t solve the problem. Do people really want those kinds of cuts? CUMMINGS: Well, I think in addition to those challenges that you’ve just outlined, there is an additional one for this Congress and the White House if they really want to do anything. And that is that there is a sizable majority in the 60 percents in a recent poll by Kaiser who thinks you can fix Medicare and Social Security by just cutting the other parts of the budget. So, the public, while they may be coming around, they aren’t ready for this debate yet. There’s a lot of education that would have to take place before Washington could move in a serious and fundamental way. What struck me with the deficit commission in December was they made recommendations that would change Social Security, for instance. MATTHEWS: Yes. CUMMINGS: These — the effect of — the effect of those changes wouldn’t take place, wouldn’t affect anybody until 2050, OK? That’s a long time from now. MATTHEWS: I know. CUMMINGS: And, yet, they were criticized roundly on both sides of the aisle. And nobody’s been willing to touch that one. So, until they deal, they bring the public with them, I think this will remain, they’ve got to educate the public. But until they do that, I think it’s going to be a very tough issue. MATTHEWS: So, you’re 26 years old and this will affect you. I’m going the math. It’s 39 years from now. MOLINARI: Twenty-six-year-olds, 52-year-olds don’t rely on Social Security for our benefits. I mean, we’ve all grown up with the reality we don’t think it’s going to be there for them. That is why I think — you know, look, the line is being drawn. The abdication of leadership by President Obama in following in anything that his deficit commission — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Who on the other side is doing it? MOLINARI: Three week, Paul Ryan, and you just heard John Boehner say they`re going to make some changes in terms of entitlement reforms. When they come forth with their budget when they’re done cleaning — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Do you think that’s a smart move on their part? MOLINARI: I think it is a smart move for this country. And I think the voters understand it now. I think it is a different time than when Paula Hawkins and others — MATTHEWS: Jeanne, do you think the Republicans are going to be the first ones to move on this? Not the Democrats? CUMMINGS: I will be — I think they are going to do something. They are promised to do it and there will be something in their budget. Whether that is a serious proposal or not, I’m skeptical of. Only because we’ve been in this town for a long time and there are a lot of proposals that are supposedly serious proposals but they really aren’t. So, we’ll see if they will be first out and it will be a serious proposal. MATTHEWS: I will be very impressed — negatively or positively, I’ll be impressed if your party, the Republican Party, actually says, raise the retirement age, reduce the benefit levels, something that a person can see when they watch a program like this and read the paper, they can get it. They are cutting the benefits. MOLINARI: This is the party that’s at least proposed the spending cuts for C.R. that the Democrat Party was suppose to pass last year and moving toward September. So, let’s give them credit for what they’ve done so far. MATTHEWS: You’ve just done that. That’s sufficient. Anyway, thank you, Susan Molinari. It’s great to have you on because you are a good partisan. But I’m waiting for the Republicans or anybody — because I watched this under Reagan. And he was as popular as you could get in this country, and he got burnt on this thing.

Continue reading …

This . I saw this via a ggreenwald tweet .There’s really not enough targets out there for EE to wank against that he has to lie about Greg Sargent? I guess good reporting makes Erick nervous. First, he writes a neon glaring lying headline which in turn frames the post as if Sargent is demanding union violence and then is rewarded for his ask. Here’s the link, click through if you like: Washington Post’s Greg Sargent Demands Unions Get Violent. Union Goons Attack Fox Reporter. The Washington Post’s leftwing mouthpiece, Greg Sargent, who they ostensibly pay to be an objective reporter is on twitter demanding that unions in Wisconsin get violent to get their way. In what we can presume is unrelated to Greg Sargent’s call, a Fox News reporter was attacked by union thugs in Wisconsin. Once I pointed out on Twitter that Sargent was calling for unions to get violent in Wisconsin, Sargent declared he was not promoting violence despite actually writing on twitter: Dear union thugs: Will you please get violent in Wisconsin already? Pretty please? Note also that Sargent is calling union members “thugs”. Wow, Greg did all that with one tweet. Behold the mighty tweet. The scummy part is that Erickson knows Greg was being sarcastic when he wrote that so he admits it later on in the post, but still justifies the smear. The point here is not that Sargent actually is endorsing violence. I’m sure he really was being sarcastic. The point is that Greg Sargent, after demanding that unions get violent in Wisconsin, wants us to extend to him a courtesy — that of not taking his tweet at face value — he has a willful pattern of refusing to do with conservatives and Republicans. See, for example, his insistence that the tea party movement wants “to reverse” abolition, women’s suffrage, and civil rights. What’s good for the goose . . . Exit point: Yes, I believe Sargent was being sarcastic . The problem is that if I or Sarah Palin or anyone on the right had said something similar, Greg Sargent and his friends would never, ever extend us the courtesy of recognizing the sarcasm, etc. If you need proof, just dig around for Sargent’s writings about Sarah Palin’s target map. EE is clearly clueless or just lying again because Sarah Palin’s target map was not sarcasm. It was reckless and she was called out about it immediately by someone who was shot in the head after complaining about the target map. Maybe EE forgot her name. It’s Gabby Giffords. Greg shouldn’t have to defend himself from this, but he did so I wanted to mention it to you all.

Continue reading …

This . I saw this via a ggreenwald tweet .There’s really not enough targets out there for EE to wank against that he has to lie about Greg Sargent? I guess good reporting makes Erick nervous. First, he writes a neon glaring lying headline which in turn frames the post as if Sargent is demanding union violence and then is rewarded for his ask. Here’s the link, click through if you like: Washington Post’s Greg Sargent Demands Unions Get Violent. Union Goons Attack Fox Reporter. The Washington Post’s leftwing mouthpiece, Greg Sargent, who they ostensibly pay to be an objective reporter is on twitter demanding that unions in Wisconsin get violent to get their way. In what we can presume is unrelated to Greg Sargent’s call, a Fox News reporter was attacked by union thugs in Wisconsin. Once I pointed out on Twitter that Sargent was calling for unions to get violent in Wisconsin, Sargent declared he was not promoting violence despite actually writing on twitter: Dear union thugs: Will you please get violent in Wisconsin already? Pretty please? Note also that Sargent is calling union members “thugs”. Wow, Greg did all that with one tweet. Behold the mighty tweet. The scummy part is that Erickson knows Greg was being sarcastic when he wrote that so he admits it later on in the post, but still justifies the smear. The point here is not that Sargent actually is endorsing violence. I’m sure he really was being sarcastic. The point is that Greg Sargent, after demanding that unions get violent in Wisconsin, wants us to extend to him a courtesy — that of not taking his tweet at face value — he has a willful pattern of refusing to do with conservatives and Republicans. See, for example, his insistence that the tea party movement wants “to reverse” abolition, women’s suffrage, and civil rights. What’s good for the goose . . . Exit point: Yes, I believe Sargent was being sarcastic . The problem is that if I or Sarah Palin or anyone on the right had said something similar, Greg Sargent and his friends would never, ever extend us the courtesy of recognizing the sarcasm, etc. If you need proof, just dig around for Sargent’s writings about Sarah Palin’s target map. EE is clearly clueless or just lying again because Sarah Palin’s target map was not sarcasm. It was reckless and she was called out about it immediately by someone who was shot in the head after complaining about the target map. Maybe EE forgot her name. It’s Gabby Giffords. Greg shouldn’t have to defend himself from this, but he did so I wanted to mention it to you all.

Continue reading …

We always knew that Mike Huckabee is prone to occasional lapses in which he reveals his real, deeply ignorant self. But this one takes the cake: MALZBERG: Don’t you think it’s fair also to ask him, I know your stance on this. How come we don’t have a health record, we don’t have a college record, we don’t have a birth cer – why Mr. Obama did you spend millions of dollars in courts all over this country to defend against having to present a birth certificate. It’s one thing to say, I’ve — you’ve seen it, goodbye. But why go to court and send lawyers to defend against having to show it? Don’t you think we deserve to know more about this man? HUCKABEE: I would love to know more. What I know is troubling enough. And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American. When he gave the bust back to the Brits — MALZBERG: Of Winston Churchill. HUCKABEE: The bust of Winston Churchill, a great insult to the British. But then if you think about it, his perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau Revolution in Kenya is very different than ours because he probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather. Huckabee, of course, is just repeating his Fox News colleague Stuart Varney’s slimy attack on President Obama of a few weeks ago — a simple and outrageous lie. And yes, Varney was just repeating Glenn Beck. As Eric Hananoki at Media Matters observes: Contrary to Huckabee’s claims, Obama did not grow up in Kenya. Obama spends significant portions of his book Dreams From My Father describing his first visit to Kenya in the late 1980s. On page 304, Obama writes of his arrival at Kenyatta International Airport (emphasis added): Kenyatta International Airport was almost empty. Officials sipped at their morning tea as they checked over passports; in the baggage area, a creaky conveyor belt slowly disgorged luggage. Auma was nowhere in sight, so I took a seat on my carry-on bag and lit a cigarette. After a few minutes, a security guard with a wooden club started to walk toward me. I looked around for an ashtray, thinking I must be in a no-smoking area, but instead of scolding me, the guard smiled and asked if I had another cigarette to spare. “This is your first trip to Kenya, yes?” he asked as I gave him a light. “That’s right.” “I see.” He squatted down beside me. “You are from America. You know my brother’s son, perhaps. Samson Otieno. He is studying engineering in Texas.” I told him that I’d never been to Texas and so hadn’t had the opportunity to meet his nephew. This seemed to disappoint him, and he took several puffs from his cigarette in quick succession. The BBC noted in a 2008 article that “Barack Obama has never lived in Kenya and he has visited the country just three times.” Additionally, Obama did not grow up “with a Kenyan father and grandfather.” Indeed, Dreams From My Father is largely about Obama’s struggles with the absence of his father. The AP noted in 2006 that Obama “was mostly raised in Hawaii and did not know his Kenyan father well.” Maybe Huckabee is thinking of Indonesia, where in fact Obama lived between the ages of 6 and 10. I think the Dutch were bigger subject there than the British, though. And it’s a looooooooong way from Kenya. Either Huckabee is a secret Birther, or he’s as ignorant of his geography as the Shrilla From Wasilla.

Continue reading …

Turkey and Iran may be winners, and the US a loser in the end – but first Arab societies must ‘win’ by making revolution work David Cameron’s suggestion that Britain may arm Libyan rebels opposed to Muammar Gaddafi vividly illustrates the dangerously fine line western leaders must tread as revolutionary unrest sweeps the Arab world. Despite recent violence, Libya is not yet in a state of civil war. But arming the opposition is a sure way to guarantee it soon could be. Thus a forcible intervention designed to help may have the opposite effect to that intended. Cameron’s ingenuous ideas about ending the Gaddafi era, outlined to the House of Commons this week, were prompted in part by a desire to ensure Britain is on the “winning” side when the history of the 2011 Arab awakening is written. This echoes the fatuous debate in Washington over whether Barack Obama “lost” Egypt when he abandoned Hosni Mubarak. Through their latest statements, the US and Britain are trying to assure, among other things, good post-revolution relations with successor regimes. But it’s clear, with the upheavals that began in Tunisia in December still spreading , that western military intervention in specific countries to hasten that end could be both hazardous and counter-productive. On the whole, affected populations say they do not want it , or only in very limited form. Gaddafi, for example, claims the US and Britain are bent on recolonisation and stealing Libya’s oil. He would like nothing better than to portray the rebellion as a western-inspired, anti-Arab plot. In terms of “winners” and “losers”, the US and close allies like Britain and Israel are already firmly positioned in the latter category. Washington has lost, or is losing, key alliances with pro-western leaders in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and some Gulf states. Where autocracies remain entrenched, as in Saudi Arabia, confidence in the western allies has been badly shaken, not least by the way they dumped Mubarak and suddenly ramped up the rhetoric of “universal values”. Successful revolutions will not guarantee a return to cordiality. “If democracy does take root in the Middle East – and the jury is still out – the regimes that emerge may well be much tougher customers than the autocracies they replace,” said Charles Kupchan of the US Council on Foreign Relations . “Western observers and policy-makers had better stop operating under the illusion that the spread of democracy to the Middle East also means the spread of western values.” The twin forces of political Islam and nationalism would wield ever greater clout in more open, post-revolutionary Arab states, he suggested. In short, the strategic outlook has changed permanently. Nor will it be clear, for a considerable while, who western governments are dealing with. “The regimes that emerge may call themselves democracies and the world may go along with the lie, but the test of a system is how the power relationships work behind the scenes” US analyst, Robert Kaplan , said. “The Arab world must create from the dust of tyrannies legitimate political orders. It is less democracy than the crisis of central authority that will dominate the next phase of Middle Eastern history.” If there are any state “winners” so far in this rapidly shifting geo-strategic chess game, they are Turkey and Iran, Saudi and other analysts suggest. “Viewed through the prism of a zero-sum conflict between a US-led alliance of Arab autocrats and Israel against an Iran-led ‘resistance’ camp, the Arab rebellion has been nothing short of catastrophic for the anti-Iran forces, ” Tony Karon wrote in The National . But this conclusion, he warned, was “based on the flawed premise that a setback for the US is automatically a gain for Iran. The Arab declaration of independence from Washington is anything but a declaration of loyalty to Tehran” – despite Iranian claims. A more comfortable thought, for western leaders at least, is that moderate, secular, neo-Islamist-led Turkey may provide a paradigm for emerging post-revolutionary Arab societies. Turkish commentators certainly see it this way. Turkey’s reform experience “could assist them in building a platform for channelling the aspirations and expectations of people to reflect better governance and transparency”, Abdullah Bozkurt said in Today’s Zaman. “Turkey can certainly be an inspiration for a lot of people in these countries.” Such sentiments reflect the newfound confidence of a former Middle Eastern empire that has successfully reinvented itself, one century on, as an ambitious and supposedly benign regional power. But even help from such a quarter may initially be too much for the Arab world’s opposition forces and successor regimes at this delicate moment. First and foremost, they themselves must “win” by making their revolutions work – for it is they, more than any outsiders, who will suffer the consequences of failure. Foreign policy US foreign policy Muammar Gaddafi Libya Middle East Egypt Saudi Arabia Arab and Middle East protests Simon Tisdall guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …