Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1671)
Rep. Keith Ellison’s emotional closing remarks

Click here to view this media (YouTube) Rep. Keith Ellison’s (D-MN) emotional closing remarks today at the House Committee on Homeland Security and their inquiry into the extent of radicalization among American Muslims. The committee is chaired by Rep. Peter King (R-NY). ELLISON: Let me close with a story, but remember that it’s only one of many American stories that could be told. Mohammed Salman Hamdani was a 23-year-old paramedic, a New York City police cadet and a Muslim American. He was one of those brave first responders who tragically lost their lives in the 9/11 terrorist attacks almost a decade ago. As The New York Times eulogized, “He wanted to be seen as an all-American kid.” Mr. Hamdani bravely sacrificed his life to try and help others on 9/11. After the tragedy some people tried to smear his character solely because of his Islamic faith. Some people spread false rumors and speculated that he was in league with the attackers only because he was Muslim. It was only when his remains were identified that these lies were fully exposed. Mohammed Salman Hamdani was a fellow American who gave his life for other Americans. His life should not be defined as a member of an ethnic group or a member of a religion, but as an American who gave everything for his fellow citizens. I yield back. As Think Progress noted, “Hamdami’s mother, Talat Hamdani, is at the hearings today. She works with September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, which opposes the hearings.”

Continue reading …
NPR Correspondent Dons Headscarf in Sting to Expose Border Guard Bias

An NPR correspondent recently went incognito for a sting operation aimed at exposing U.S. border agents who target Muslims for “interrogation” at the Canadian border. Employing the same tactics used by James O'Keefe to bring down top NPR executives, counterterrorism correspondent Dina Temple-Raston draped herself in a headscarf, drove to the northern border, and recorded her encounter with a U.S. border agent. [Click here for audio.] “An agent from Customs and Border Protection was sitting in what looked like a little toll booth,” recalled Temple-Raston on the March 10 Morning Edition, who gave the agent no indication that he was being recorded. “He asked me to remove my sunglasses and peered into the car. I was wearing a headscarf and so was Kathy Jamil. He asked why we'd been to Canada.” According to Temple-Raston, Kathy Jamil, the Muslim principal of an Islamic school in Buffalo, New York, travels frequently between the U.S. and Canada and is routinely peppered with questions that she finds offensive. But Temple-Raston failed to contrast questions asked by U.S. officials with questions asked by Canadian officials, who have a border of their own to protect. As useful as such a contrast would have been in determining the extent to which Canadian border enforcement measures depart from U.S. practices, the veteran foreign affairs journalist chose to dig up “cases” of potential abuse to construct a narrative that U.S. agents habitually profile Muslims for “interrogation” because of their religion. Take Samer Shehata, who was pulled aside for additional questioning by customs agents in Florida. “Shehata and his family were taken into a secondary screening room,” intoned Temple-Raston. “Forty minutes ticked by. Shehata started to worry about missing his connecting flight. The agents asked Shehata about his parents, what he studied in college, where he went to college.” A professor of Middle Eastern studies at Georgetown University, Shehata was allegedly asked a certainly peculiar but hardly bigoted question by border agents: “who will win” the war on terrorism? The question seems innocent enough given Shehata's expertise in Middle Eastern politics, but an indignant Temple-Raston treated it like a serious offense: “Who's going to win? The Muslims or the Americans? The Israelis or the Palestinians?” Plowing ahead with her refrain, Temple-Raston questioned Thomas Winkowski, the assistant commissioner at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, about allegations of religious profiling at the Canadian border. “The line we don't cross is that we are improperly taking into consideration individuals' race and religion and the like,” explained Winkowski. “To me that's the boundary, that's the line.” Winkowski's answer clearly did not satisfy Temple-Raston, who turned to an ACLU spokeswoman to refute the border agent. “The question is when does discretion lead to abuse?” asked Temple-Raston. “The difference here is between routine and non-routine questions,” responded Hina Shemsi, the executive director of the ACLU's National Security Project. Temple-Raston added, “What the government can't do, [Shemsi] says, is ask about religion absent some suspicion of wrongdoing.” When pressed by Temple-Raston, Shemsi drew the same line that Winkowski drew. Not only that, but Temple-Raston failed to present any evidence that U.S. agents were in fact inquiring about religion without having any suspicion of wrongdoing. And even if they had, Winkowski maintained that the U.S. government does not tolerate such behavior. Click here for the print version of the March 10 story. A transcript of the relevant portions of the radio program can be found below: DINA TEMPLE-RASTON: Kathy Jamil is the principal of an Islamic school in Buffalo, New York. Jamil's Muslim and she wears a headscarf. Because of where she lives, she crosses into Canada and back frequently and lately that's meant U.S. immigration officials peppering her with questions. She offered to show me what happens. So we went to Niagara Falls, spent a few hours in Canada, and then came back. We approached the U.S. border at Rainbow bridge. An agent from Customs and Border Protection was sitting in what looked like a little toll booth. He asked me to remove my sunglasses and peered into the car. I was wearing a headscarf and so was Kathy Jamil. He asked why we'd been to Canada. I said I was working on a story on a notorious murder involving two local Muslims. It had been the talk of Buffalo. He asked Jamil if she was related to the murderer. TEMPLE-RASTON: That's Samer Shehata, a professor of Middle East studies at Georgetown University. He ran into trouble at customs in Florida this past January. He was returning to the U.S. with his wife and son from a vacation in Cancun. SAMER SHEHATA: After she looked at our passports and do her computer work she asked us to follow her, which was something I hadn't experience before. TEMPLE-RASTON: Shehata and his family were taken into a secondary screening room. Forty minutes ticked by. Shehata started to worry about missing his connecting flight. SHEHATA: And a few minutes afterwards I was summoned to speak to the supervisor of Homeland Security at the Fort Lauderdale airport. TEMPLE-RASTON: And so what did he ask you? SHEHATA: Well it wasn't so much asking, it was more an interrogation. TEMPLE-RASTON: The agents asked Shehata about his parents, what he studied in college, where he went to college. Shehata suggested the supervisor look up his resume on the Georgetown University website. Then he says, the interview took a bizarre turn. SHEHATA: After he asked me what I teach at Georgetown University and my response was Middle East politics, he asked “Who is going to win.” TEMPLE-RASTON: Who is going to win? The Muslims or the Americans? The Israelis or the Palestinians? Shehata said he wasn't sure what the question meant. Finally, after nearlytwo hours, Shehata got his U.S. passport back. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …

Not that we ever had any doubt, but now perhaps even the corporate media minions will understand that all this “budget crisis” talk is merely a smokescreen for their plan to stop Obama’s reelection: A prank call from a man purporting to be petrochemical billionaire David Koch to Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) a few weeks ago revealed that Walker had crafted his “budget repair” bill in a bid to crush the labor unions. The revelation was at odds with the GOP’s public argument, that removing collective bargaining rights has something to do with the state’s budget deficit. In an interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly moments ago, State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), one of Walker’s closest allies in the legislature, confirmed the true political motive of Walker’s anti-union push. Fitzgerald explained that “this battle” is about eliminating unions so that “the money is not there” for the labor movement. Specifically, he said that the destruction of unions will make it “much more difficult” for President Obama to win reelection in Wisconsin: FITZGERALD: Well if they flip the state senate, which is obviously their goal with eight recalls going on right now, they can take control of the labor unions. If we win this battle, and the money is not there under the auspices of the unions, certainly what you’re going to find is President Obama is going to have a much difficult, much more difficult time getting elected and winning the state of Wisconsin . Fitzgerald’s transparent effort to defund his political opponents by stripping the rights of teachers and nurses is facing a backlash. In a few months, the defunders may be deposed. Following a report by ThinkProgress that several pro-Walker state lawmakers are eligible for recall, progressive activists around Wisconsin began filing the paperwork to remove eight GOP state senators from office.

Continue reading …
Domestic terrorism of the right-wing kind: Spokane arrest manifests once again where the threat lies

Click here to view this media Not that it’ll ever happen, but boy, does Bill O’Reilly owe Mark Potok an apology. One day after castigating Potok publicly on his Fox News show for contending that “our biggest domestic terror threat … pretty clearly comes from the radical right in this country”, Potok’s point was pretty clearly substantiated by the arrest of 36-year-old Kevin Harpham for planting a backpack bomb along the parade route on Martin Luther King Day in Spokane. Bill Morlin has more details at Hatewatch : The emerging picture suggests 36-year-old Kevin William Harpham is a “lone wolf’’ with a military ordinance background and apparently increasingly extreme radical-right views that may have prompted the attempt to carry out a mass murder on the late civil rights leader’s birthday. He is also a man who has joined a neo-Nazi group, apparently posted to racial extremist websites and worried that the 9/11 attacks were actually a government conspiracy. The domestic terrorism suspect faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the initial two charges he faces: attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and possession of an improvised explosive device. Other federal charges could come when a federal grand jury in Spokane reviews the case on March 22. “This one is very serious,” federal defender Roger Peven said outside the courtroom, moments after he was appointed to represent Harpham. The backpack bomb, reportedly containing shrapnel dipped in rat poison to enhance bleeding, was spotted moments before hundreds of people were to march by it. Authorities rerouted the parade immediately. At some risk, a bomb squad defused the device and kept it intact — likely leading the FBI to capture a windfall of forensic evidence, possibly including fingerprints and DNA that could have identified Harpham as the suspect. Of special note is the fact that Harpham appears to have been an admirer of Alex Jones’ conspiracy theories: On another Web site, Harpham posted that he watched the video “Loose Change” — popularized by the antigovernment “Patriot” group We Are Change — that the U.S. government was behind the attacks of Sept. 11. Leading anti-Semites, including Christopher Bollyn, have suggested that Jews were responsible for 9/11. On the “Loose Change” Facebook page, there are references to a “Zionist connection” and links to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion — a famous forgery that is a touchstone for the neo-Nazi right, including the late founder of the Aryan Nations, Richard Butler, who accuse Jews of plotting to control the world. “I typically don’t buy into these conspiracies, then my friends told me to watch this video called ‘Loose Change,’” Harpham posted on another website forum devoted to steam automobiles. “Some of the stuff was speculation but overall it changed my opinion greatly,’’ the Harpham posting said. It’s not coincidental that, as Alexander Zaitchik recently reported for Rolling Stone , Gabrielle Giffords’ would-be assassin, Jared Loughner, was also an admirer of Loose Change . Also worth remembering: Harpham happens to fit precisely the warning of the dangers inherent in rising right-wing extremism made two years ago by the Department of Homeland Security in its much-maligned bulletin for law enforcement — specifically the key language in the report that upset all those conservatives: DHS/I&A assesses that lone wolves and small terrorist cells embracing violent rightwing extremist ideology are the most dangerous domestic terrorism threat in the United States. Information from law enforcement and nongovernmental organizations indicates lone wolves and small terrorist cells have shown intent—and, in some cases, the capability—to commit violent acts. [..] DHS/I&A has concluded that white supremacist lone wolves pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat because of their low profile and autonomy—separate from any formalized group—which hampers warning efforts. [..] Similarly, recent state and municipal law enforcement reporting has warned of the dangers of rightwing extremists embracing the tactics of “leaderless resistance” and of lone wolves carrying out acts of violence. … U//FOUO) Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities. Of course, conservatives have been trying to whitewash away the existence of these radicals. Unfortunately for them — and the rest of us too — the radicals won’t let them do it for long. In their eagerness to promote Peter King’s dubious and nakedly Islamophobic hearings on homegrown Islamic-radical terrorism, O’Reilly and his Fox colleagues have openly sneered at suggestions that we ought to do the same for right-wing extremists and their mounting acts of violence. This case definitively underscores that need, embodied in the 22 cases we’ve documented over the past two and a half years : Simultaneously, it’s also not very clear that the Islamic radicals pose a serious threat in terms of domestic terrorist activity. Certainly, there’s plenty of reasons to believe that the threat of homegrown Islamic terrorism is wildly overstated — not least of which is the fact that, as Zaid Jilani at ThinkProgress reported, terrorism incidents in the USA have been coming from non-Muslim sources at nearly twice the rate as that of Muslims. Indeed, it’s probably overstated to the same degree that the danger of right-wing extremists is understated. Perhaps there needs to be some reassessment of our terrorism priorities here — particularly in the media. David Holthouse at Media Matters has more on the suspect. See the Spokesman Review’s coverage of Hapham’s court appearance, too. You can read the federal complaint here (PDF – 55.64 KB) .

Continue reading …
Michael Moore: This is a Class War That’s Been Leveled Against the Working People of This Country

Click here to view this media Michael Moore talked to Rachel Maddow about the latest potentially illegal move by the Wisconsin Republicans to jam through their union busting bill and what they are doing there and across the country where similar measures are being passed — class warfare. MOORE: I just want to say, anybody who lives within driving distance of Madison, Wisconsin right now, should make their way to the capitol. I would love to see thousands of people there right now, there, in that capitol building, in that rotunda, out on the lawn, whatever it takes. I mean really, this is really, this is war. This is a class war that’s been leveled against the working people of this country. And at some point people are just going to have to stand up and say, non-violently, this is enough. We’re not taking it any more. I’d say Michael got his wish since reports were that there were thousands who showed up at the capitol tonight. Moore discussed why the Republicans assumed that they could get away with this amount of overreach — they’ve already gotten away with Wall Street destroying our pension funds, wrecking the economy and with gutting the middle class and there’s been no response from the people. No one from Wall Street is in jail. Moore is hopeful that they’re finally not going to get away with what they’re doing this time. As he noted there are going to be students in Wisconsin are calling for nationwide student walkout of high schoolers this Friday at 2pm in your local time zone. As Michael said, these protests do matter. I hope he’s right and we’re going to see more of this across the country. The only time the working people have made gains is when they were willing to take to the streets and stand up for their rights.

Continue reading …
Stupidest Polling Report Ever, Thanks to Megyn Kelly

Click here to view this media Oh, Megyn! Could you be any more breathless in this segment? Of course, Fox did “break” this news as if the world were ending, so I suppose you can’t be the only one to blame. But really, you must do better on how you read polls, dear. I’ve been taken to task for misstating polls here on C&L, so I’m pretty careful about not taking them at face value anymore. Megyn Kelly, not so much, especially when it plays into the Fox News agenda of reassuring their viewers that the President is doomed to be a one-termer. In this segment, Megyn is practically breathless with joy as she announces to the world that the President’s poll numbers have dropped a full ten points in a week! Oh no, the sky is falling. Only, those numbers didn’t smell right, so I looked a little closer at the graphic. It’s a Reuters/Ipsos poll , and while I can’t link up the actual poll questions since Reuters hasn’t published it, the sample of independent voters was huge (not) — 181 people out of a total of 1,040. The margin of error on that question was +/- 7.4%, while the overall margin of error was +/-3.1%. Then we have Megyn-clone Monica Crowley chime in. Her stunning analysis that his poll numbers improved with independents in December – February because he was “acting more like a Republican than a Democrat” is pure fantasy with absolutely no basis in fact other than to continue lying to viewers and make everyone think the majority in this country are conservative. Here’s what Megyn didn’t bother to report from that very same poll: Weighing in on the Washington budget debate, 59 percent of Americans prefer to cut existing programs while 30 percent would rather raise taxes to reduce deficit spending. And they prefer to cut defense spending rather than programs that affect them more directly like Medicare and Social Security . Again, I don’t know the specific margin of error on that question, but that’s a pretty significant piece of information, don’t you think? Well, it is unless you’re Fox News. If you’re Fox News, Megyn Kelly and Monica Crowley it’s worth dramatic music, a flashing “alert” sign, and breathless announcements that the President’s approval is “tanking” with independents. Tanking if you think a margin of error swing of 7.4% is anywhere near accurate, anyway. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Continue reading …
Stupidest Polling Report Ever, Thanks to Megyn Kelly

Click here to view this media Oh, Megyn! Could you be any more breathless in this segment? Of course, Fox did “break” this news as if the world were ending, so I suppose you can’t be the only one to blame. But really, you must do better on how you read polls, dear. I’ve been taken to task for misstating polls here on C&L, so I’m pretty careful about not taking them at face value anymore. Megyn Kelly, not so much, especially when it plays into the Fox News agenda of reassuring their viewers that the President is doomed to be a one-termer. In this segment, Megyn is practically breathless with joy as she announces to the world that the President’s poll numbers have dropped a full ten points in a week! Oh no, the sky is falling. Only, those numbers didn’t smell right, so I looked a little closer at the graphic. It’s a Reuters/Ipsos poll , and while I can’t link up the actual poll questions since Reuters hasn’t published it, the sample of independent voters was huge (not) — 181 people out of a total of 1,040. The margin of error on that question was +/- 7.4%, while the overall margin of error was +/-3.1%. Then we have Megyn-clone Monica Crowley chime in. Her stunning analysis that his poll numbers improved with independents in December – February because he was “acting more like a Republican than a Democrat” is pure fantasy with absolutely no basis in fact other than to continue lying to viewers and make everyone think the majority in this country are conservative. Here’s what Megyn didn’t bother to report from that very same poll: Weighing in on the Washington budget debate, 59 percent of Americans prefer to cut existing programs while 30 percent would rather raise taxes to reduce deficit spending. And they prefer to cut defense spending rather than programs that affect them more directly like Medicare and Social Security . Again, I don’t know the specific margin of error on that question, but that’s a pretty significant piece of information, don’t you think? Well, it is unless you’re Fox News. If you’re Fox News, Megyn Kelly and Monica Crowley it’s worth dramatic music, a flashing “alert” sign, and breathless announcements that the President’s approval is “tanking” with independents. Tanking if you think a margin of error swing of 7.4% is anywhere near accurate, anyway. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Continue reading …

Was it really just a few years ago where the Republicans were constantly talking about “the rule of law”? I’m actually glad this happened, because now there’s absolutely no doubt that Scott Walker’s primary goal was not to balance the budget, but to break the state employee unions: Madison, Wisconsin (CNN) — Wisconsin’s Republican-led state Senate passed Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed restrictions on collective bargaining for public employees Wednesday, getting around a Democratic walkout by stripping financial provisions from the bill. “Tonight, the Senate will be passing the items in the Budget Repair Bill that we can with the 19 members who actually do show up and do their jobs,” Sen. Scott Fitzgerald, the chamber’s Republican majority leader, said in a statement announcing the move. The Senate’s 14 Democrats had fled to Illinois to prevent the chamber from attaining a quorum and passing the collective bargaining measures, which they have called an unnecessary attack on the rights of public employees. Republicans were able to move ahead by voting only on the nonfinancial aspects of Walker’s proposed bill, which requires fewer members for a quorum. Phil Neuenfeldt, president of the state AFL-CIO, said Wednesday night’s maneuver “shows that Scott Walker and the Republicans have been lying throughout this entire process.” “None of the provisions that attacked workers’ rights had anything to do with the budget,” Neuenfeldt said. “Losing badly in the court of public opinion and failing to break the Democratic senators’ principled stand, Scott Walker and the GOP have eviscerated both the letter and the spirit of the law and our democratic process to ram through their payback to their deep-pocketed friends.”

Continue reading …

Isn't the existence of “radical mosques” in America the

Continue reading …
Activists attacked in Tahrir Square as El Baradei confirms his candidacy

Nobel peace laureate pledges to run for President of Egypt on condition of real democratic reform Small groups of men armed with rocks and knives have attacked hundreds of pro-reform protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square ahead of a move by the the Egyptian army to eject the last campaigners from the centre of the uprising that drove President Mubarak from power. Reformists have continued to gather in Tahrir Square since Mubarak was toppled on Februay 11, though not as many as before. Activists have called for bigger participation to press demands for political reform. However, state television on Wednesday showed footage of hundreds of people in the square facing off and throwing rocks as protesters said they came under attack. “A group of gangsters attacked us with stones, they seemed to be wanting us to leave the square,” said Gamal Hussein, 60. Later in the day, army officers were seen removing protesters’ tents asking them to leave the square, according to witnesses. Amnesty International cited witnesses claiming that the army were beating up protesters, breaking up informal medical clinics and wiping out the memory cards of journalists attempting to record the events. At least two people were reported injured. Meanwhile the reformer and Nobel peace laureate Mohamed El Baradei confirmed that he would run in the Presidential elections this year, but only on the condition of real democratic reform, not the proposals currently being drawn up by the interim government. Speaking on a live talk show on Egypt’s ONTV channel, El Baradei said that he would vote against proposed constitutional reforms on 19 March, describing them as “superficial” and an “insult to the revolution.” He also called for parliamentary elections to be delayed. Current military rulers have said they want to hand over power six months after Mubarak is ousted, but El Baradei said that this would run the risk that the well organised Muslim Brotherhood would control the new parliament. “We are at a decisive period in Egypt’s history,” El Baradei told ONTV. “We shouldn’t rush. Everything should be on a solid basis.” El Baradei also expressed concerns that the current lack of security would hamper authorities’ ability to secure the elections or protect people going to vote. The attacks in Tahrir Square follow more violence earlier this week. Egyptian authorities confirmed that thirteen people were killed and 140 wounded in sectarian violence on Tuesday, and violence between Coptic Christians and Muslims broke out after an arson attack on a church south of Cairo on Saturday. Egypt Middle East Rowenna Davis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …