Click here to view this media (YouTube) Alex Crawford of Sky News gives a behind-the-scenes account of how she was able to report from Zawiya, Libya. A follow-up to my previous post, The Battle for Zawiya . COOPER: One of the things I found so moving, beyond the injuries and the courage of people who were defending themselves against this onslaught, was them coming up to you and saying, please, please, get these pictures out, please tell our story, because otherwise their deaths will be in vain, and no one will know really the truth about what is happening there right now and continues to happen there right now at this hour. For you, you used the word massacre. Are you saying what is happening there is a massacre? CRAWFORD: Well, the true sense of the word massacre is large-scale deaths, right? There are large-scale deaths going on there, and these are primarily — I mean, seriously, they are — 99 percent of them are civilians. They are women. They are children. They are old people. They’re not fighters. They’re not soldiers. They’re just people who are criticizing and who want a change of government. I don’t — if that’s not a massacre, I don’t know what is. They actually can’t do much to defend themselves. They are (AUDIO GAP) to even leave. They can’t even get out of the way of the firing. And they are continuing to be (AUDIO GAP). And that’s why, at the end, there was almost constant firing, but one particular brave individual managed to get us out under fire. And it was so important for them to know that we were going to be able to broadcast the pictures to the world, because as far as Gadhafi authorities are concerned, that didn’t happen. The march didn’t happen. There aren’t tens of thousands of people in Zawiyah who are critical of him, Gadhafi, and they aren’t being shelled and they aren’t being killed. And if we hadn’t actually had the help and support of these incredibly courageous people, they would still be saying that. But now — now that the pictures, I would suggest, have put a — put (INAUDIBLE) to those lies. They — how can we make up those pictures? We saw people dying with horrible injuries, and they are civilians. They are — boys are as old as my son, who is 15. They are young men. I saw one young man who looks he was — he might be a university student, if he was living in Britain or America. He had glasses on. He was wearing a T-shirt and jeans. He didn’t look at all like a soldier. He was being shown at the last minute as these tanks were rolling into the square how to use a rocket-propelled grenade launcher. And someone was saying, put it on your shoulder, put it on your shoulder. Just try to kneel a bit and just fire. And he says Allahu akbar and goes off to fight and probably is not alive now. This is — these are civilians. So, I don’t know what — if that isn’t a massacre, I really don’t know what is. COOPER: Well, Alex, I have been just so struck by your reporting over these last several days. And thank you for talking with us. And I’m so glad you’re safe. And I’m so glad you have been able to tell the world what is really happening, the truth about what is happening in Zawiyah. Thank you. CRAWFORD: Thanks for asking me on. UPDATE : According to ITV news , Zawiya has now fallen. The centre devastated, perhaps hundreds of lives lost. Gaddafi’s men are cleaning up Zawiya, the town they have finally taken after bombarding it for a week. They have brought in road sweepers to brush away the evidence of the worst fighting between Libyans in a century. It is certainly the worst devastation I’ve seen in any town centre. … The only people were bands of Gaddafi’s men, high on victory and bent on revenge, searching buildings for any sign of the rebels who had held them at bay for a week. A resident told us by phone two days ago that there wasn’t an animal in the street or a bird in the air above Zawiya. She was right. Dozens were killed in the battle for Martyrs’ Square. There are now many more “martyrs” buried there. I counted more than 20 new graves. Clean-up crews swept furiously, trying to make the square look normal. Soon there will be no sign of what I saw: blackened tanks being loaded on to transporters; militia vehicles burned and peppered with bullet holes; the clothing of the newly dead, shot in a battle in Gaddafi’s backyard.
Continue reading …The instinct here is that an Associated Press “story” by Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, will get lots of radio and TV time tomorrow. That would be a reasonable expectation, because what Bauer writes isn't really a “story” as much as it is a free political announcement. I'm predicting that the establishment press will love it, especially the opening paragraph: Wis. defeat could help launch counterattack on GOP
Continue reading …Click here to view this media You know, I used to have some respect for Jack Cafferty even though I knew back then that we were on primarily opposite ends of the political spectrum because he spoke out against the Bush administration when that wasn’t necessarily the most popular thing for a conservative to be doing, but he just lost me completely here. Calling Social Security a “welfare program” is just shameless. The widows and orphans who receive those benefits do so after a spouse or a parent paid into the system and seniors receive the benefit after paying into it for their entire lives. And unemployment insurance is just that, insurance. It’s not welfare. And does Jack really think we should just leave our elderly, the disabled and young mothers and children with no help to pay their medical bills at all? What cost does he think it would be to our society to just leave those people to rot on the streets? Painting people who receive these benefits as “welfare” recipients paints a picture of a bunch of lazy unemployed people who don’t want to work, and just want to sit on their duffs and collect government benefits. Does he think that most of the people receiving these benefits now haven’t worked for a living most of their lives and paid into the system? At a time when we’ve got record unemployment and underemployment and a lot of good, decent, hard working Americans who would like to find jobs and can’t, asking a question with this frame is doing nothing but trying to pit one middle or lower class individual in the United States against another and get them to resent each other. It’s divide and conquer bulls**t to distract from us from those who have caused our economic problems and they are NOT the elderly, the poor, the unemployed, widows, orphans and young mothers and their children who don’t have any health insurance. Shame on you Jack. Here’s his post at The Cafferty File. Thankfully a lot of the answers if you go read his entire comments section were a whole lot better than his question, but sadly a lot of the comments there were from individuals who’ve bought into the kind of resentment that Cafferty is peddling here. What does it mean if social welfare benefits make up 1/3 of wages, salaries in U.S.? : Americans have become alarmingly dependent on handouts from Uncle Sam, according to a new report. Government social welfare programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and unemployment insurance made up 35% of all public and private wages and salaries last year. That’s more than one-third of all the money Americans earned. These findings are contained in a study of government data done by TrimTabs Investment Research. In 2000, 21% of all wages and salaries in the United States came from social welfare programs. In 1960, it was just 10%. One of the economists at TrimTabs says we’re in for some difficult times ahead unless this country can get back to at least the 26% ratio it had before the recession started. And she says there are only two ways to do that: Either increase private sector wages and salaries by 35% or cut social welfare benefits by nearly a quarter. Neither of those things is likely to happen. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the so-called entitlement programs, make up more than 60% of federal spending each year. As the baby boomers get older, retire and need more medical care, the costs for those programs will only go up. While the squabbling over budget cuts continues on Capitol Hill, you can be sure no one is touching these programs. The $60 billion measure passed by the House last month didn’t touch one dime of those three programs. As the evidence continues to mount that our country is hurtling toward an economic disaster, our government refuses to respond in any meaningful way. Here’s my question to you: What does it mean if social welfare benefits make up more than 1/3 of all wages and salaries paid in the U.S.? Interested to know which ones made it on air? Mike in Brooklyn: It means that we’re in a bad Recession. One so bad that it’s really a Depression. What is shocking to me about how you phrase your question, Jack, is that you fail to include all the handouts to businesses (especially the large corporations), trade associations, and “development” commissions, among other entities, that get subsidies. Sylvia in San Diego: It means that we are a welfare nation and in order to recover from this economic disaster, it will be very painful for many. Larry in Springfield, Ohio: Jack, it means that those jobs that Americans refuse to do need to be done by Americans that refuse to do them. If they are able otherwise, we need to stop paying people not to work. A.: Welcome to reality. The middle class used to make money and pay taxes. Now the rich make the money and don’t pay taxes; the poor don’t make money and receive poverty credits to keep them from attacking the system with pitchforks. Patsy: Jack, I’m certainly no authority but how can Social Security be classified as a “handout” when people who draw on it are the same people who used some of their salary to pay into it? It is money earned but saved. The Government should never have borrowed on it in the first place, and technically were not supposed to. If left alone to earn interest, most likely there would be more money now. Nancy in Tennessee: The answer does lie in increasing wages and salaries in the private sector by 35%. It all boils down to jobs. This country needs more jobs that will provide a living wage. Americans are hurting individually and that translates into a hurting American economy. Rick: It means that we are a socialist country, whether we like it or not. And while people may not like the label, just try taking away all that income! Bob: It means I’m in the wrong job!
Continue reading …I keep wondering just why Big Agra is so indifferent to this. It’s really strange, isn’t it? I mean, it’s not as if they can artificially pollinate all the crops around the world: The mysterious collapse of honey-bee colonies is becoming a global phenomenon, scientists working for the United Nations have revealed. Declines in managed bee colonies, seen increasingly in Europe and the US in the past decade, are also now being observed in China and Japan and there are the first signs of African collapses from Egypt , according to the report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The authors, who include some of the world’s leading honey-bee experts, issue a stark warning about the disappearance of bees, which are increasingly important as crop pollinators around the globe. Without profound changes to the way human beings manage the planet, they say, declines in pollinators needed to feed a growing global population are likely to continue. The scientists warn that a number of factors may now be coming together to hit bee colonies around the world, ranging from declines in flowering plants and the use of damaging insecticides, to the worldwide spread of pests and air pollution . They call for farmers and landowners to be offered incentives to restore pollinator-friendly habitats, including key flowering plants near crop-producing fields and stress that more care needs to be taken in the choice, timing and application of insecticides and other chemicals . While managed hives can be moved out of harm’s way, “wild populations (of pollinators) are completely vulnerable”, says the report. “The way humanity manages or mismanages its nature-based assets, including pollinators, will in part define our collective future in the 21st century,” said Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary-General and UNEP Executive Director. “The fact is that of the 100 crop species that provide 90 per cent of the world’s food, over 70 are pollinated by bees. “Human beings have fabricated the illusion that in the 21st century they have the technological prowess to be independent of nature. “Bees underline the reality that we are more, not less, dependent on nature’s services in a world of close to seven billion people.”
Continue reading …Egyptians will no longer tolerate paying for the state-run newspapers that peddled Hosni Mubarak’s propaganda A few hours before the ousting of the former president Hosni Mubarak, the Tahrir Square protesters were described in Egypt ‘s state-run media as “vandals” and “hooligans”. A few hours after Mubarak’s fall, the “vandalisers” had become “heroes”, and what was previously described as “chaos instigated by foreign powers” had suddenly become “a glorious revolution”. None of this impresses young Egyptians who – unlike older generations – have become accustomed to seeking out more neutral sources of information. They are increasingly fluent in alternative media, whether it’s social media such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, or the newly emerging independent newspapers that suffered under the former regime and are seen as one of the reasons behind the 25 January revolution. Sales of state-run papers have fallen quite drastically – partly because of the growth in independent media but also because of the way they sugar-coated Mubarak’s unpopular regime. One of the more outrageous examples came last September when al-Ahram doctored a photograph taken during the Israel-Palestine peace talks in Washington to suggest that 82-year-old Mubarak was leading the negotiations. The most loyal readers of the state-run press come from older generations who have a nostalgic attachment. Meanwhile, the young people who now represent the majority of the market prefer independent media – even foreign media such as the BBC, al-Jazeera and the Guardian – to get a more accurate picture. There are no reliable circulation figures for the state-run press in Egypt. Rafik Bassel, a media analyst and chief executive of Smartcomm advertising agency, says al-Ahram claims a circulation of 800,000 on weekdays and 1,000,000 on Fridays. He doubts this claim and suggests the real figure is 140,000 on weekdays of which 40,000 are subscriptions paid for by the government and distributed to officials around the country. “Advertising in state-run newspapers has been mandatory for businesses close to the previous regime,” Bassel added. “Large companies, banks and services were ordered to publish ads … not to mention obituaries, ‘congratulation’ ads, etc.” Mostafa Sakr, the chairman and editor of the independent al-Borsa daily (who used to work for al-Ahram’s economic magazine) told me that not only has the circulation of all state-run newspapers plunged seriously, but their influence has declined too. According to Sakr, people want sources of information they can trust – which is why sales of the independent newspaper al-Shorouk doubled during the revolution, reaching a circulation of about 150,000 a day. Even in the online world, independent media have proved more successful. Al-Youm al-Sabea news website was named as the Middle East’s top online newspaper by Forbes. Al-Ahram, the highest-ranking state-run newspaper on the list, came in 24th place. Economically speaking, these increasingly unpopular media outlets have become a financial burden on the Egyptian treasury. Taxpayers were paying the regime to provide them with lies and propaganda. A report from the Central Auditing Agency in 2008 accused Rose al-Youssef newspaper of wasting public money, since 74% of its printed copies were returned unsold, making its actual sales less than 2,500 a day. Rose al-Youssef, like many other state-run media, has a long and proud history that was severely polluted by its affiliation to unpopular, corrupt regimes. The future situation of these outlets is still unclear. However, the supreme council of armed forces, which is in charge of Egypt until a new president is elected in August, has ordered the dissolution of the information ministry – something the opposition had long been calling for. The ministry was regarded as the government’s means for controlling the media and limiting its freedom. Many journalists have also demonstrated at the syndicate of journalists, calling for the dismantling of the higher council of journalism, a government body controlled by parliament which is in charge of – and owns – Egypt’s seven state-funded newspapers. Whatever the future of these publications, the status quo should not be an option. Some of these papers, such as Rose al-Youssef, circulate in the low thousands and get funding in the tens of millions. With new, independent, credible and economically successful models of newspapers, the state-run press should be something of the past. If they can be made profitable they should probably be privatised so they can break free from the government’s grip and develop a more independent tone. If they cannot be profitable (which is more likely) then there is no reason for them to stay and be the burden they are. “If the state stops funding [its] newspapers, they will collapse in a heartbeat,” Bassel said. Egyptians have long paid a huge bill to be told lies. It’s time to do something more with this money. The era of communist-style propaganda is over in Egypt and the disparity between the content provided by state-run and independent newspapers has already narrowed since the fall of Mubarak’s regime. Starting a new era in Egypt should come with a new set of media practices and allow trusted names to lead a less stagnant media scene, replacing newspapers whose editorial policies were developed secretly in state security offices on presidential orders. Egypt Hosni Mubarak Newspapers Digital media Newspapers & magazines Middle East Arab and Middle East protests Press freedom Osama Diab guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Peter King, in his opening remarks this morning to kick off his congressional hearings on the “problem” of “Muslim radicalization”: This Committee cannot live in denial which is what some would have us do when they suggest that this hearing dilute its focus by investigating threats unrelated to Al Qaeda. The Department of Homeland Security and this committee were formed in response to the al Qaeda attacks of 9/11. There is no equivalency of threat between al Qaeda and neo-Nazis, environmental extremists or other isolated madmen. Only al Qaeda and its Islamist affiliates in this country are part of an international threat to our nation. Indeed by the Justice Department’s own record not one terror related case in the last two years involved neo-Nazis, environmental extremists, militias or anti-war groups. How unfortunate for Rep. King that, just the day before — and apparently before he could edit his opening remarks — the FBI arrested a white supremacist for planting a backpack bomb along the parade route for Spokane’s Martin Luther King Day celebration in January … an act labeled by the FBI as an act of domestic terrorism. He was reminded in short order by Democrat Bennie Thompson: Click here to view this media [H/t Karoli for the videos] I want to reiterate, however, my belief that a hearing on the linkage between extreme ideology and violent action be a broad-based examination. Yesterday, the FBI made an arrest in a recent Martin Luther King Day bombing attempt. News reports identify the suspect as a member of the same white supremacist group that influenced Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. I urge you, Mr. Chairman, to hold a hearing examining the Homeland Security threat posed by anti-government and white supremacist groups. As a committee on Homeland Security, our mission is to examine threats to this nation’s security. A narrow focus that excludes known threats lacks clarity and may be myopic. Indeed, as Zaid Jilani at ThinkProgress explains, not only was King embarrassingly wrong about right-wing domestic terrorist of recent vintage, he was wrong about the past year as well — in which there were four terrorism incidents involving neo-Nazis. And that doesn’t begin to count the militia cases, beginning with the Hutaree folks. For what it’s worth, American neo-Nazis are indeed frequently linked up with likeminded fascists in Europe and Australia, and yes, they are all outspoken in their desire to topple the United States government. Peter King may be living in denial, but the rest of us should know that neo-Nazism is indeed an international terrorist conspiracy to destroy America. In case you were wondering. And as long as Rep. King is trotting out graphics, here’s one for him to consider :
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Peter King, in his opening remarks this morning to kick off his congressional hearings on the “problem” of “Muslim radicalization”: This Committee cannot live in denial which is what some would have us do when they suggest that this hearing dilute its focus by investigating threats unrelated to Al Qaeda. The Department of Homeland Security and this committee were formed in response to the al Qaeda attacks of 9/11. There is no equivalency of threat between al Qaeda and neo-Nazis, environmental extremists or other isolated madmen. Only al Qaeda and its Islamist affiliates in this country are part of an international threat to our nation. Indeed by the Justice Department’s own record not one terror related case in the last two years involved neo-Nazis, environmental extremists, militias or anti-war groups. How unfortunate for Rep. King that, just the day before — and apparently before he could edit his opening remarks — the FBI arrested a white supremacist for planting a backpack bomb along the parade route for Spokane’s Martin Luther King Day celebration in January … an act labeled by the FBI as an act of domestic terrorism. He was reminded in short order by Democrat Bennie Thompson: Click here to view this media [H/t Karoli for the videos] I want to reiterate, however, my belief that a hearing on the linkage between extreme ideology and violent action be a broad-based examination. Yesterday, the FBI made an arrest in a recent Martin Luther King Day bombing attempt. News reports identify the suspect as a member of the same white supremacist group that influenced Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. I urge you, Mr. Chairman, to hold a hearing examining the Homeland Security threat posed by anti-government and white supremacist groups. As a committee on Homeland Security, our mission is to examine threats to this nation’s security. A narrow focus that excludes known threats lacks clarity and may be myopic. Indeed, as Zaid Jilani at ThinkProgress explains, not only was King embarrassingly wrong about right-wing domestic terrorist of recent vintage, he was wrong about the past year as well — in which there were four terrorism incidents involving neo-Nazis. And that doesn’t begin to count the militia cases, beginning with the Hutaree folks. For what it’s worth, American neo-Nazis are indeed frequently linked up with likeminded fascists in Europe and Australia, and yes, they are all outspoken in their desire to topple the United States government. Peter King may be living in denial, but the rest of us should know that neo-Nazism is indeed an international terrorist conspiracy to destroy America. In case you were wondering. And as long as Rep. King is trotting out graphics, here’s one for him to consider :
Continue reading …This is sick and twisted but entirely predictable, because extremist conservatives already in the government are now being emboldened by the arrival of the Fox News Tea Party Brigade in the halls of power. Abortion Law: Mother Denied Abortion, Then Had To Watch Baby Die Nebraska’s new abortion law forced Danielle Deaver to live through ten excruciating days, waiting to give birth to a baby that she and her doctors knew would die minutes later, fighting for breath that would not come. And that’s what happened. The one-pound, ten-ounce girl, Elizabeth, was born December 8th. Deaver and husband Robb watched, held and comforted the baby as it gasped for air, hoping she was not suffering. She died 15 minutes later. The sponsor of the controversial Nebraska statute, Sen. Mike Flood of Norfolk, told the Des Moines Register that the law worked as it was intended in the Deavers’ case. “Even in these situations where the baby has a terminal condition or there’s not much chance of surviving outside of the womb, my point has been and remains that is still a life,” Flood said in an interview with the Iowa newspaper . Conservatives don’t like the government intruding on their lives except when it intrudes on someone who doesn’t share their religious beliefs. Ghouls. Julie Schmit-Albin, who heads Nebraska Right to Life, told the AP in a Sunday interview that the tragic outcome was better than an abortion: “We acknowledge the tragedy that occurs with a poor prenatal diagnosis for the baby. But isn’t it more humane for the baby to die in a loving manner with comfort care and in the arms of her parents than by the intentional painful death through abortion?” Deaver believes that such a decision should belong to her and her husband. “It was very frustrating and added to our grief because the waiting compounded everything,” she told the AP . LGF writes: Witness the inhumanity of the right wing anti-choice movement…And again, we see the fanatic’s absolute lack of empathy for the woman who was forced to bear a doomed child, and watch it die in agony. So heartless it boggles the mind. That my friends is at the core of the Tea Party movement and don’t let them tell you anything different. Julie Schmit-Albin and Sen. Mike Flood of Norfolk remind me of Doctor Heiter of the cult classic The Human Centipede. If you’ve seen it you know what I mean. My heart goes out to Daniele Deaver.
Continue reading …Update 2:03pm 3/10: The Wisconsin Assembly just passed the bill as amended , with 4 Republicans voting no. This is a PDF of what the Wisconsin Senators passed last night. It isn’t just unions they’re aiming at. Every public program, worker, and Wisconsin citizen will be at risk as a result of this “legislation”, if that’s even what it is. Here are as many of the highlights as I can gather in one place. This is intended to be a laundry list. Each of these topics probably deserve a post of their own, but I want a list of the crazy all in one place. Day Care Providers – Eliminates all authority for collective bargaining units, and rescinds authority for the Milwaukee County child care provider services unit to negotiate with union representatives to modify hours or conditions of employment as part of a state takeover of that program. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority Board – Eliminates all collective bargaining rights terminates contracts with UWHCB, transfers all employees to the UWHC Authority, who will negotiate all compensation and benefits as existing contracts expire. Medical Assistance (BadgerCare) – Orders a study of: ways to increase cost-effectiveness, efficiency of care, and care delivery system for existing programs. Fiscal impact of limiting switches from private health insurance to Medical Assistance After the study: Require cost-sharing from recipients; Authorize providers to deny care or services if recipient cannot pay cost-sharing Modify (reduce) existing benefits or establish tiered benefits Mandate enrollment in managed care Restrict or eliminate presumptive eligibility (allowing participants to be excluded via arbitrary definition) Restrict benefits to individuals who are not US citizens (note there is no distinction for documented vs. undocumented) Reduce income levels for purposes of determining eligibility (currently 185% of Federal Poverty Level) Note on BadgerCare changes: Those impacted will be those most needy, as well as students. According to this document, programs affected would be BadgerCare Plus for childless adults and the family planning waiver program; Medicaid for elderly, blind and disabled people, Medicare premium assistance programs, Wisconsin Well-Woman Medicaid and SeniorCare to the extent permitted under the Affordable Care Act (which Congressional Republicans seek to repeal, of course) Reduce funding for Aging and Disability Resource Centers Repeal all statutes relating to Wisconsin Quality Home Care Authority. Such a repeal would also repeal authority to establish a process for WQHCA to establish a single statewide collective bargaining unit to bargain for wages and benefits. (Note: In May, 2010, independent home care workers voted to make SEIU Healthcare Wisconsin their representative. In December an agreement was reached for wages of $9 per hour, effective 7/1/2012. The legislature has not ratified the agreement, and repeal will nullify them.) State Employees – Rearrange employment structure to replace department administrator “classified” positions with unclassified positions, and delegate authority to the Office of State Employment Relations to appoint a deputy director or executive assistant from outside the group of classified employees. (Cronyism, anyone?) Allows the director to arbitrarily reassign anyone in a career executive position to a different agency provided the receiving agency approves the assignment. (Hmmm, DMV to DHS might be awkward, you think?) Allows the Governor to terminate any state employee during a state emergency if the employee: (a) fails to report to work for 3 working days without approval; (b) participates in a strike, work stoppage, sit-down, stay-in, slowdown or “other concerted activities”, including sick calls and/or mass resignations. Retirement and Health Insurance Contributions – Employee pays any required contribution in excess of 5% of earnings. Executives and elected officials will not be required to make any additional contribution. Employees who are entitled to additional contributions for negotiated benefit increases, will have to contribute an additional amount. Repeal authority for state and local employers to pay all or part of employees’ contributions unless the employees are police, firefighters, state troopers or state inspectors. Employees required to make contributions would begin making them on the first payday after March 13, 2011. If the withholding can’t be implemented in time, employees will be subject to make-up withholding until all amounts are caught up. No local government can establish a Defined Benefit Plan unless employees are required to pay one-half of the actuarial cost. Requires employees to contribute 12% of the cost of health insurance. Require feasibility study to require employees to shift to a “low-cost health care coverage plan” (???) or a high deductible plan with HSA, or via a state exchange as established in the PPACA. Lower pension accruals for elected officials and state executive. Increase co-payments and re-design benefits in existing health plans. Collective Bargaining Agreements – Consistent with what has been reported as to requirement that unions be recertified annually, prohibits local governments from entering into agreements with unions, ties wage increases to the CPI, repeals and terminates all agreements with University of Wisconsin employees, prohibits payment of union dues via payroll deduction. There are more provisions, but they’re quite specific and a little too wonky for what is already a too-wonky post. Wetlands – Gives tax preference to municipalities who convert existing wetlands to non-wetland parcels. In addition, such areas would also be exempt from water quality standards applicable to wetlands, provided that area is used for business. I realize this is long, but there’s really more you need to know. If you go back to King Walker’s proclamation and call for a Special Legislative Session on January 3, 2011 and use it as a road map, you’ll see the following bullets: Check – Creation of the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation Check – Tax credits for small businesses Check – Tax credits for new businesses Check – Passing legislation adding penalties to health savings accounts for state income tax purposes Check ( for this session only ) – Requiring a supermajority for passage of tax increase legislation (Californians have come to LOVE this one…not) Check – Claiming state authority to grant exemptions to water quality standards in wetland areas. Not Yet – Limiting noneconomic damages in actions against long-term care providers, manufacturers, distributors, sellers and promoters of certain products, health care privacy violations, health care providers, homicide or injury due to careless weapon handling, criminal abuse of disabled or the elderly, damages for frivolous claims and punitive damages awards. Let’s call this one tort reform on steroids. If you don’t feel like you’ve been beaten up and left bruised and battered on the side of the road after reading this list, I don’t know what to say. Each bullet point is an act of violence against working people. Each one. And I wonder what Koch Industries wants with those wetlands. Obviously it’s something fairly nasty if they need water quality exemptions. Let’s all take our pain reliever of choice and then get to work tossing these despots out of office.
Continue reading …MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell on Thursday brought the specter of bigotry into Representative Peter King's hearings on the threat of radical Islam in America. While interviewing Congressman Dan Lungren of California she awkwardly hinted, ” Well, you know, you and I are both white .” The irritated Republican wondered, “What does that mean?” Mitchell lectured, “I'm just asking, get in their heads for a second and try to think about how it is to be a Muslim-American facing these kinds- this kind of testimony today. That's all I want to know.” In an earlier segment, the Andrea Mitchell Reports host casually insisted that the hearings are “a great lesson against the dangers of over-generalizing, of generalizing at all about particular groups.” [See video below. MP3 audio here .] Correspondent Kelly O'Donnell appeared with the anchor and offered a similarly condescending tone. Highlighting the guests that King called to speak about the threat of Islamic fundamentalism, O'Donnell asserted, “We have been hearing from some experts and I use that word with almost quotations around it, because the expert qualifications have been challenged ” O'Donnell found some of King's witnesses to be suspect because they were relating “personal stories.” FoxNews.com described one such witness: Melvin Bledsoe, whose son allegedly attacked an Army recruiting center in Arkansas, said in written testimony — which Fox News has seen — that Americans are ignoring the issue. “There is a big elephant in the room, but our society continues not to see it. This wrong is caused by political correctness. You can even call it political fear,” he said. Bledsoe plans to describe how his son, Carlos, was radicalized when he went off to college in Nashville, Tenn. In his testimony, he explained how his son's personality changed and how, when he returned home for the holidays in 2005, he told his family he converted to Islam. From that point, he changed his name and eventually traveled to Yemen. A transcript of the first segment and a partial transcript of the segment one, both of which aired on March 10, follow: 1:05 ANDREA MITCHELL: NBC News correspondent Kelly O'Donnell is on the hill. Kelly, what is the outcome of all of this? What have we learned today? KELLY O'DONNELL: I think we've clearly seen how exposed emotions and raw nerves are on display here for nearly four hours now. It is so unusual to see the validity and the appropriateness of the hearing to be challenged throughout the hearing. And that's the sense you got with that exchange between the Chairman, Peter King and Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas. We have been hearing from some experts and I use that word with almost quotations around it, because the expert qualifications have been challenged as well, of people who have come forward to say a loved one of theirs was radicalized by groups to do harm to the United States. More personal stories. There's that part of it. There's been a witness who has been talking about the need for more cooperation within the Muslim-American community, to not have political correctness, is the phrase often being used, to hinder cooperation. On the other side, we had really emotional and exceedingly unusual testimony from Congressman Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, who spoke with such emotion, as you showed a portion of that at the beginning of the program. He was trying to say, as many others are,
Continue reading …