There’s no sign of Speaker John Boehner’s promised “jobs, jobs, jobs.” Instead, extremist teabagger Republicans are busily trying to take care of the already-rich, kick people when they’re down, and further weaken the ability of those who do have jobs to strike against employers: All around the country, right-wing legislators are asking middle class Americans to pay for budget deficits caused mainly by a recession caused by Wall Street; they are attacking workers’ collective bargaining rights, which has provoked a huge Main Street Movement to fight back. Now, a group of House Republicans is launching a new stealth attack against union workers. GOP Reps. Jim Jordan (OH), Tim Scott (SC), Scott Garrett (NJ), Dan Burton (IN), and Louie Gohmert (TX) have introduced H.R. 1135, which states that it is designed to “provide information on total spending on means-tested welfare programs, to provide additional work requirements, and to provide an overall spending limit on means-tested welfare programs.” Much of the bill is based upon verifying that those who receive food stamps benefits are meeting the federal requirements for doing so. However, one section buried deep within the bill adds a startling new requirement. The bill, if passed, would actually cut off all food stamp benefits to any family where one adult member is engaging in a strike against an employer. The bill also includes a provision that would exempt households from losing eligibility, “if the household was eligible immediately prior to such strike, however, such family unit shall not receive an increased allotment as the result of a decrease in the income of the striking member or members of the household.” Yet removing entire families from eligibility while a single adult family member is striking would have a chilling effect on workers who are considering going on strike for better wages, benefits, or working conditions — something that is especially alarming in light of the fact that unions are one of the fundamental building blocks of the middle class that allow people to earn wages that keep them off food stamps . But here’s the punchline: Striking workers have been ineligible for food stamps for years . (The only way a striker is eligible right now is if you met the eligibility standards before you went on strike — and if you belong to a union, odds are, you didn’t.) So not only are teabagger Republicans just plain mean and pandering to special interests, they’re stupid to boot! Their bill also rolls back back spending on government assistance programs back to 2007 levels, plus inflation, once unemployment falls below 6.5 percent. (Well, at least we know that won’t be anytime soon!) New Jersey’s Rep. Scott Garrett, a teabagger hero, is also busy trying to slash funding for the SEC – but denies that he’s doing it. (Says the fact that its spending has gone up so much since the market crash proves the agency has plenty of funding, thank you very much!) Oh, and he’s one of the Republicans who voted against extending the budget. He’s also the guy who’s pushing for every bill to show “constitutional authority” for why Congress has the right to pass the bill. Rep. Jim Jordan, the other person who wants to kick voters when they’re down? Was he working on “jobs, jobs, jobs”? Nope. He’s chair of the extremist Republican Study Committee , a caucus that exists to push House Republicans Further. To. The. Right. Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN) wasn’t working on “jobs, jobs, jobs,” either. He voted against the budget extension, too. Instead, he introduced a nasty little states-right bill: “Last week, President Obama made an unprecedented decision to declare a Federal law unconstitutional and thereby abdicate his own constitutional responsibility to uphold and defend that law. Activist judges, and now an activist President, have been trying to unilaterally define marriage for too long. This issue should instead be decided once and for all by the American people and the states. “That is why I have introduced the “Marriage Protection Act” which simply states that no Federal Courts will have jurisdiction to hear cases regarding same-sex marriage . Instead, the definition of same-sex unions would be determined by the people through their State legislatures or via referendum. And he also sponsored a bill that would strip President Obama “of his power to waive a law requiring him to move the embassy to Jerusalem.” Rep. Louis Gohmert? He’s from Texas and the author of the famous “terror babies” story. A real American! Last but not least, South Carolina’s Rep. Tim Scott. The poor guy’s really got to prove himself – first, because he voted for the continuing resolution that extended the budget for three weeks, but also because he’s a black Republican. So he’s a member of the Club for Growth, plus he just introduced the Rising Tides Act of 2011. And what does it do, exactly? It cuts the corporate income tax rate by 10% on companies making more than $10 million annually. Where on earth are those jobs, jobs, jobs?
Continue reading …When a mutual friend at DFA called me to tell me about a candidate for state Senate in New Jersey running in a Paterson-based district not far from where I once lived, I came away very impressed with his credentials and with the significance of the race beyond just the borders of his north New Jersey district. But I decided to check him out further by calling an old friend of Blue America’s 2010– and hopefully 2012– congressional candidate Ed Potosnak. I asked Ed if he’d ever met Jeff Gardner. His enthusiasm was positively explosive and I asked him to write a few lines for us today: “I am extremely pleased Jeff Gardner is running for NJ State Senate. Jeff is a progressive Democrat, which is sorely needed in our state Legislature, and a strong voice in support of equality and opportunity for all, not just a select few. His opponent, a 30+ year Trenton incumbent, has lost touch with the needs of his constituents, and has failed to deliver for his district. In addition to being a strong advocate for all residents, Jeff is down to earth, able, approachable, and will fight to create jobs and to realign our State’s out of control spending to attract and retain business and stimulate innovation. As a fellow New Jerseyan who cares deeply about our America’s economic recovery, reestablishing trust in government, and ensuring equality, I hope you will join me, and Blue America, in supporting Jeff. When elected he will change how NJ works.” As we explained at DownWithTyranny a couple of days ago, it takes a really exceptional candidate for Blue America to go beyond our mission of electing progressives to the U.S. House. Jeff is just such a worthy exception. And his opponent, John Girgenti, New Jersey Majority Whip, is drowning in a sewer scandal and made a name for himself by loudly and spitefully crossing the aisle in Trenton to vote with the GOP against marriage equality. Please join Jeff in the comments section below and if you like what you hear and can handle it, please consider making a $5 or $10 contribution to his grassroots campaign through our Blue America ActBlue page . Jeff is eager to rid the Democratic Party of a bigoted and corrupt fossil like Girgenti and then to move forward and deal with an even worse problem: Chris Christie. “We need leaders in Trenton,” he told me, “who are looking out for our families, not the politically-connected and the powerful. We can’t balance our budgets on the backs of working families. Our cities and our middle-class have sacrificed enough. I promise to protect vital government services and make sure multi-millionaires and faceless corporations pay their fair share.” And in case you’re discouraged that the power of well-funded corrupt political hacks like Girgenti is too much to overcome, keep in mind that Jeff already beat him once! “He used to be the Democratic municipal chairman in my hometown of Hawthorne. After years of increasingly bad results for Democrats at the local level, I mounted a challenge and won. Against an entrenched incumbent whose support is built on little more than patronage and graft, it seems that hard work and the promise of real representation is quite effective.”
Continue reading …When a mutual friend at DFA called me to tell me about a candidate for state Senate in New Jersey running in a Paterson-based district not far from where I once lived, I came away very impressed with his credentials and with the significance of the race beyond just the borders of his north New Jersey district. But I decided to check him out further by calling an old friend of Blue America’s 2010– and hopefully 2012– congressional candidate Ed Potosnak. I asked Ed if he’d ever met Jeff Gardner. His enthusiasm was positively explosive and I asked him to write a few lines for us today: “I am extremely pleased Jeff Gardner is running for NJ State Senate. Jeff is a progressive Democrat, which is sorely needed in our state Legislature, and a strong voice in support of equality and opportunity for all, not just a select few. His opponent, a 30+ year Trenton incumbent, has lost touch with the needs of his constituents, and has failed to deliver for his district. In addition to being a strong advocate for all residents, Jeff is down to earth, able, approachable, and will fight to create jobs and to realign our State’s out of control spending to attract and retain business and stimulate innovation. As a fellow New Jerseyan who cares deeply about our America’s economic recovery, reestablishing trust in government, and ensuring equality, I hope you will join me, and Blue America, in supporting Jeff. When elected he will change how NJ works.” As we explained at DownWithTyranny a couple of days ago, it takes a really exceptional candidate for Blue America to go beyond our mission of electing progressives to the U.S. House. Jeff is just such a worthy exception. And his opponent, John Girgenti, New Jersey Majority Whip, is drowning in a sewer scandal and made a name for himself by loudly and spitefully crossing the aisle in Trenton to vote with the GOP against marriage equality. Please join Jeff in the comments section below and if you like what you hear and can handle it, please consider making a $5 or $10 contribution to his grassroots campaign through our Blue America ActBlue page . Jeff is eager to rid the Democratic Party of a bigoted and corrupt fossil like Girgenti and then to move forward and deal with an even worse problem: Chris Christie. “We need leaders in Trenton,” he told me, “who are looking out for our families, not the politically-connected and the powerful. We can’t balance our budgets on the backs of working families. Our cities and our middle-class have sacrificed enough. I promise to protect vital government services and make sure multi-millionaires and faceless corporations pay their fair share.” And in case you’re discouraged that the power of well-funded corrupt political hacks like Girgenti is too much to overcome, keep in mind that Jeff already beat him once! “He used to be the Democratic municipal chairman in my hometown of Hawthorne. After years of increasingly bad results for Democrats at the local level, I mounted a challenge and won. Against an entrenched incumbent whose support is built on little more than patronage and graft, it seems that hard work and the promise of real representation is quite effective.”
Continue reading …When a mutual friend at DFA called me to tell me about a candidate for state Senate in New Jersey running in a Paterson-based district not far from where I once lived, I came away very impressed with his credentials and with the significance of the race beyond just the borders of his north New Jersey district. But I decided to check him out further by calling an old friend of Blue America’s 2010– and hopefully 2012– congressional candidate Ed Potosnak. I asked Ed if he’d ever met Jeff Gardner. His enthusiasm was positively explosive and I asked him to write a few lines for us today: “I am extremely pleased Jeff Gardner is running for NJ State Senate. Jeff is a progressive Democrat, which is sorely needed in our state Legislature, and a strong voice in support of equality and opportunity for all, not just a select few. His opponent, a 30+ year Trenton incumbent, has lost touch with the needs of his constituents, and has failed to deliver for his district. In addition to being a strong advocate for all residents, Jeff is down to earth, able, approachable, and will fight to create jobs and to realign our State’s out of control spending to attract and retain business and stimulate innovation. As a fellow New Jerseyan who cares deeply about our America’s economic recovery, reestablishing trust in government, and ensuring equality, I hope you will join me, and Blue America, in supporting Jeff. When elected he will change how NJ works.” As we explained at DownWithTyranny a couple of days ago, it takes a really exceptional candidate for Blue America to go beyond our mission of electing progressives to the U.S. House. Jeff is just such a worthy exception. And his opponent, John Girgenti, New Jersey Majority Whip, is drowning in a sewer scandal and made a name for himself by loudly and spitefully crossing the aisle in Trenton to vote with the GOP against marriage equality. Please join Jeff in the comments section below and if you like what you hear and can handle it, please consider making a $5 or $10 contribution to his grassroots campaign through our Blue America ActBlue page . Jeff is eager to rid the Democratic Party of a bigoted and corrupt fossil like Girgenti and then to move forward and deal with an even worse problem: Chris Christie. “We need leaders in Trenton,” he told me, “who are looking out for our families, not the politically-connected and the powerful. We can’t balance our budgets on the backs of working families. Our cities and our middle-class have sacrificed enough. I promise to protect vital government services and make sure multi-millionaires and faceless corporations pay their fair share.” And in case you’re discouraged that the power of well-funded corrupt political hacks like Girgenti is too much to overcome, keep in mind that Jeff already beat him once! “He used to be the Democratic municipal chairman in my hometown of Hawthorne. After years of increasingly bad results for Democrats at the local level, I mounted a challenge and won. Against an entrenched incumbent whose support is built on little more than patronage and graft, it seems that hard work and the promise of real representation is quite effective.”
Continue reading …In a Wednesday story at Reuters (“Bombing near Jerusalem bus stop kills woman, 30 hurt”) describing the aftermath of “a bomb planted in a bag exploded near a bus stop in a Jewish district of Jerusalem,” reporter Crispian Balmer wrote the following (bold is mine): Medics said three people were seriously hurt by the explosion, which hit one of the main routes into central Jerusalem in the afternoon, shattering the windows of a nearby bus. A woman in her 60s died in hospital. Police said it was a “terrorist attack” — Israel's term for a Palestinian strike. It was the first time Jerusalem had been hit by such a bomb since 2004. My, my. It's as if the word “terrorist” was invented by the Israelis just for the occasion. Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic reacted (HT Instapundit ): Dear Reuters, You Must Be Kidding … Those Israelis and their crazy terms! I mean, referring to a fatal bombing of civilians as a “terrorist attack”? Who are they kidding? Everyone knows that a fatal bombing of Israeli civilians should be referred to as a “teachable moment.” Or as a “venting of certain frustrations.” Or as “an understandable reaction to Jewish perfidy.” Or perhaps as “a very special episode of 'Cheers.'” Anything but “a terrorist attack.” I suppose Reuters will mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11 by referring to the attacks as “an exercise in urban renewal.” The mind reels. That it does. This is the same wire service which, with help from other press outlets, was treating us to so many deliberately doctored photos from Lebanon in relation to Israeli strikes against terrorists (no need for scare quotes) in 2006 that it gave rise to a new term which has made it into the Urban Dictionary — fauxtography . Perhaps the doctoring of photos has subsided; the doctoring of news clearly hasn't. It's also clear that Crispian Balmer isn't keeping to the standard held up by Thomson Reuters CEO Tom Glocer (HT LGF via Michelle Malkin ) in the wake of the fauxtography scandal in December of 2006: The final lesson we learned was this – more than ever the world needs a media company free from bias, independent, telling it as it really is, without the filter of national or political interest… …Telling the story truthfully is more important than ever. Reporting it without spin and without editorializing is critical if history is to accurately record events. If Glocer, who is still CEO , really believes this, he needs to have a talk with Crispian Balmer. Final question: Glocer's bio indicates that “He is a director of Merck & Co., Inc.” Conflict of interest in reporting on health care, anyone? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .
Continue reading …Keith Stuart gets his hands on Nintendo’s new handheld console, the first to feature 3D gaming without the need for glasses Keith Stuart Richard Sprenger
Continue reading …Tension mounts over military action as Ankara accuses Sarkozy of pursuing French interests over liberation of Libyan people Turkey has launched a bitter attack on French president Nicolas Sarkozy’s and France’s leadership of the military campaign against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, accusing the French of lacking a conscience in their conduct in the Libyan operations. The vitriolic criticism, from both the prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the president, Abdullah Gül followed attacks from the Turkish government earlier this week and signalled an orchestrated attempt by Ankara to wreck Sarkozy’s plans to lead the air campaign against Gaddafi. With France insisting that Nato should not be put in political charge of the UN-mandated air campaign, Turkey has come out emphatically behind sole Nato control of the operations. The row came as France confirmed that one of its fighter jets had destroyed a Libyan air force plane just after it landed at the Misrata base. This was the first time the no-fly zone had been breached by pro-Gaddafi forces. The clash between Turkey and France over Libya is underpinned by acute frictions between Erdogan and Sarkozy, both impetuous and mercurial leaders who revel in the limelight, by fundamental disputes over Ankara’s EU ambitions, and by economic interests in north Africa. The confrontation is shaping up to be decisive in determining the outcome of the bitter infighting over who should inherit command of the Libyan air campaign from the Americans and could come to a head at a major conference in London next week of the parties involved. Using incendiary language directed at France in a speech in Istanbul, Erdogan said: “I wish that those who only see oil, gold mines and underground treasures when they look in [Libya's] direction, would see the region through glasses of conscience from now on.” President Gül reinforced the Turkish view that France and others were being driven primarily by economic interests. “The aim [of the air campaign] is not the liberation of the Libyan people,” he said. “There are hidden agendas and different interests.” Earlier this week, Claude Guéant, the French interior minister who was previously Sarkozy’s chief adviser, outraged the Muslim world by stating that the French president was “leading a crusade” to stop Gaddafi massacring Libyans. Erdogan denounced the use of the word crusade yesterday, blaming those, France chief among them, who are opposed to Turkey joining the EU. Senior Nato officials are meeting in Brussels for the fourth day in a row to try to hammer out an agreement on who should assume command of the no-fly zone over Libya from the Americans who are determined to relinquish command within days. Sarkozy has agreed to give Nato military planners operational command of the campaign, but refused to grant the alliance political and strategic control, insisting this should be vested in the broader “coalition of the willing” taking part. Turkey has responded by blocking Nato planning operations for Libya while stressing that Nato should be given “sole command”, senior Nato diplomats said. Turkey, Nato’s second biggest army after the US and its only Muslim member, appears bent on winning the argument. It is already taking part in Nato patrols in the Mediterranean to police an arms embargo on Libya. It wants to limit and shorten the air campaign and proscribe ground attacks on Libya by Nato aircraft. If Nato is given political command of the air effort, Turkey would be able to exercise a veto in a system run on consensus. The US’s top military officer in Europe, Admiral James Stavridis, Nato’s supreme commander Europe, has gone to Ankara to try to mediate a deal. The Turks are incensed at repeated snubs by Sarkozy. The French failed to invite Turkey to last Saturday’s summit in Paris which presaged the air strikes. French fighters taking off from Corsica struck the first blows. The Turkish government accused Sarkozy of launching not only the no-fly zone, but his presidential re-election campaign. While the dispute over Libya is substantive and political, it also appears highly personal, revealing the bad blood simmering between the French president and the Turkish prime minister. Sarkozy went to Turkey last month for the first time in four years as president. But the visit was repeatedly delayed and then downgraded from a state presidential event. He stayed in Turkey for five hours. “Relations between Turkey and France deserve more than this,” complained Erdogan. “I will speak with frankness. We wish to host him as president of France. But he is coming as president of the G20, not as that of France.” While the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is also opposed to Turkey joining the EU, she has voiced her objections moderately. Sarkozy has declared loudly that culturally Turkey does not belong in Europe, but in the Middle East. France has blocked tranches of Ankara’s EU negotiations on the grounds that it should not be seen as ever-fit for membership. Arab and Middle East unrest Turkey Nicolas Sarkozy Nato Libya Muammar Gaddafi European Union Middle East France Europe Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Glenn Beck has done lots of mainstreaming extremist beliefs and ideas in his two-plus years at Fox News — especially far-right ideas that have circulated for years among Patriot-movement militiamen and John Birch Society members, from various “New World Order” theories and claims to “Tenther” theories to his abortive flirtation with FEMA concentration-camp theories . Judging from the hints he’s been dropping on his Fox News show all this week, on Friday he’s going to once again dive into the deep, dark and murky waters of classic far-right conspiracism of the Bircher kind. He dropped hints the other day while discussing the “Liberty Dollar” scamsters — claiming, on the one hand, that he knew ahead of time that what these characters were doing was breaking the law, but simultaneously, they were telling the truth when it came to the evil Federal Reserve. BECK: Well, this guy was misguided, but he wasn’t trying to bring down the United States — at least, from what he told me. He believed the Fed was destroying the dollar — and, really? That’s a hard stretch, isn’t it? You, by the way, have to watch this show on Friday — because there is some truth to that. The unbelievable history of the Fed. The, uh — what is it, the uh, ‘Monster,’ is that what it was called? The Monster? The Creature of Jekyll Island. We will give you the truth and none of the crazy conspiracy theories on the Fed on Friday. Anyway. Beck is referencing one of the widest-read conspiracist works about the Federal Reserve, G. Edward Griffin’s The Creature from Jekyll Island , and it appears — vows to eschew conspiracy theories notwithstanding — that he intends to cite it as a credible source, much as he did with Jonah Goldberg’s fraudulent Liberal Fascism thesis in his “documentary” exposing the nefarious fascist roots of modern progressivism. In that case, he promised to eschew “conspiracy theories” too. Beck, as we all know, has previously demonstrated a fondness for the Birch Society, and this is consistent with that: Griffin, after all, was a close personal friend and longtime associate of Birch Society founder Robert Welch, and wrote a popular Birch book published in 1964, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations. The Creature from Jekyll Island is in many ways a compendium of previous works claiming that the Federal Reserve is a fundamentally illegitimate — and therefore deeply nefarious — organization. Most of these theories were deeply anti-Semitic in nature, since they depicted the Fed’s bankers as part of a Jewish cabal intent on destroying white American society. What sets Griffin’s work apart is that — like most Birch texts, which assiduously avoided anti-Semitism — he manages to scrub out the anti-Semitic elements while keeping the paranoid conspiracist elements intact. Since its publication in 1994, Griffin’s book has become a popular text for a large number of right-wing extremists, particularly tax protesters and Patriot movement believers. Griffin himself was involved in organizing a gathering on Jekyll Island last year that the Southern Poverty Law Center credits with helping revive the militia movement . It has been debunked thoroughly, of course — probably most notably by historian Gerry Rough, whose three-part series on the origins of the Fed, “Another Twist on the Jacksonian Bank War,” pretty thoroughly reveal just how fraudulent Griffin’s text really is. You can read it here: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3. Another terrific debunking of far-right Federal Reserve theories generally, including Griffin’s texts, was provided by Edward Flaherty at Public Eye. From the first part : The problem with the Aldrich Plan was that the regional banks would be controlled individually and nationally by bankers, a prospect that did not sit well with the populist Democratic party or with Wilson. As the debate began to take shape in the spring of 1913, Congressman Arsene Pujo provided good evidence that the nation’s credit markets were under the tight control of a handful of banks – the “money trusts” against which Wilson warned.1 Wilson and the Democrats wanted a reform measure which would decentralize control away from the money trusts. The legislation that eventually emerged was the Federal Reserve Act, also known at the time as the Currency Bill, or the Owen-Glass Act. The bill called for a system of eight to twelve mostly autonomous regional Reserve Banks that would be owned by the banks in their region and whose actions would be coordinated by a Federal Reserve Board appointed by the President. The Board’s members originally included the Secretary of the Treasury, the Comptroller of the Currency, and other officials appointed by the President to represent public interests. The proposed Federal Reserve System would therefore be privately owned, but publicly controlled. Wilson signed the bill on December 23, 1913 and the Federal Reserve System was born.6 Conspiracy theorists have long viewed the Federal Reserve Act as a means of giving control of the banking system to the money trusts, when in reality the intent and effect was to wrestle control away from them. History clearly demonstrates that in the decades prior to the Federal Reserve Act the decisions of a few large New York banks had, at times, enormous repercussions for banks throughout the country and the economy in general. Following the return to central banking, at least some measure of control was removed from them and placed with the Federal Reserve. It is true that the Fed was a progressive institution at the outset. And doing away with it and returning control of the banking system to the banks would be the opposite of progressive. Moreover, ending the Fed is really more about the larger far-right enterprise of gutting the power of the federal government on a number of fronts: taxes, regulating the financial sector, civil-rights laws, public education, the environment. It will be interesting to watch Friday and see just how deeply into this morass Glenn Beck dives. Given his track record, it likely will be a headfirst plunge.
Continue reading …Is Obama more 'hawkish' and yet more charming than Bush? Apparently so, claimed Time's Mark Halperin and MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski on Thursday's “Morning Joe.” Halperin believes that President Obama has been more cavalier than his predecessor, and Brzezinski thinks that although Obama has extended many of Bush's unpopular policies, he brings a different “characterization” to the table. The panel harped on the irony of Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize despite his inexperience in the White House at the time (less than a year) and the fact that he has continued American wars overseas and started a third one. Liberals Mike Barnicle and Mika Brzezinski were both admittedly taken aback by the decision to bestow the prize to President Obama. (Video after the jump. Comments from start until 3 minutes in.)
Continue reading …While academies and free schools proliferate, middle-class parents are concerned with just one thing – keeping their kids away from Dave Mania. Ex-teacher Fielding advises… In my roles of moral icon, sage, clot and dotard, I have been asked many questions. The most frequent goes thus: “Can we send Hugo/Rhapsody/Electra to your school?” “Yes! Turn right at the lights. Multiple assassins and wolf children apart, we are fiercely inclusive.” But this is no time for levity. For this is the great question. The white-knuckled, middle-class, bad-faith and very tedious question. What they really want to know is: “Can nice middle class children cope in the inner-city comp?” “Can they meet the naughty working class and still end up at a Russell Group university?” “Should we rather leg it to more leafy climes, or get religion, or build our own academy – or bottle it completely and go private?” They are wracked with worry, gripped by gaudy nightmares. The comp is seen as a sort medieval leprosarium, or a hippy Strangeways. At my old school, there were tabloid rumours of vice rings, and skinny-dipping in the sixth-form pond, and grocers’ plurals, and daggers and dealers in skunk-fogged toilets. Marvellous. Parents drove by in their Chelsea tanks and spotted my little charges chillin’ on corners, talking in tongues, gnawing on dogburgers, when they should have been at home reading Jane Austen or conjugating Latin verbs like they did at St Custards. This lot looked like something from The Wire. Can I offer solace? Wise words? I want to quote the Lovin’ Spoonful’: “Your worst nightmares are their cartoons.” But it’s not that simple. There are no easy answers. We’re all caught in a complex, crossfire of class and culture. Like Luke in year 13. He lives in Paddington with his single mother, a leftwing lawyer. How has he survived for seven years? A few nice chums, death metal music, skateboarding, some fabulous teachers – and a terrifically sane mother. He did go half daft in year 8, but who doesn’t? He did get clobbered by Dave Mania for being too clever by half and having a rich interior life, but that’s all part of an English tradition of decking intellectuals. Now, he’s mostly fine. He ducks and weaves and has moved on to Vampire Weekend and Albert Camus and writes quite appalling verse. “Why am I surrounded by such fucking dickheads, sir?” sighs he. “It will stand you in good stead for later life.” It just might. Does this exemplum offer you solace? Hope so. He’s bright as pins and replete with A*s, Oxbridge-bound and inner-city sussed. So relax. Urban comps can reach those parts the leafy boroughs can’t. And that’s my final dotard word. Schools Secondary schools Pupil behaviour Teaching Fielding guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …