Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1568)
Threat of America’s nativist far right

While Peter King holds hearings on homegrown jihadists, the growing menace of white supremacist terror goes unremarked As emerging reports would have it, Kevin William Harpham, 36, who is accused of setting a bomb to go off at the Martin Luther King Jr Day parade in Spokane, Washington, was yet another “lone wolf” terrorist, acting at his own behest and on his own behalf. Even groups on the racist, radical far right that so clearly inspired him are rushing to disown and denounce the indicted man. Regardless of whether he was a “member” of an organised group, there can yet be no doubt that Harpham saw himself as part of a movement – one that has an especially broad reach in the age of Obama, and roots as deep as American culture itself. The vision of a black president has given the racist far right one of its biggest boosts since the civil rights era of the 1960s. Figures toted up by the Southern Poverty Law Centre suggest a dramatic rise in the numbers of organized groups : their numbers grew by 40% from 2008 to 2009, and an additional 22% from 2009 to 2010, bringing the total to 2,145 groups. It’s difficult to know precisely what these numbers mean, since these groups are constantly changing names, dissolving, reforming or springing up, and few of them maintain public membership rolls. What is nonetheless clear is that a strong far right movement has re-emerged, and what unites it is the age-old American doctrine of nativism, born out of fear of some dark outsider sneaking in to steal the white man’s homeland and his hegemony. Nativist thinkers are spread all over the map, but the strongest current comes in the form of the Sovereign Citizen movement , or what used to be called the Posse Comitatus and before the posse, the Silver Shirts . For the old Posse adherents and their contemporary progeny, the white Aryan man is the only true “sovereign” over his land and his life. White women serve beneath him; black and brown “mud people” are menials worthy only of disdain; and Jews (who do not qualify as white) are usually behind it all, running the economic and financial systems through a worldwide Jewish conspiracy. They do not admit to being subject to the laws and dicates of the US government; they eschew social security, cars and drivers’ licences, and won’t pay taxes. For the true sovereign, the sheriff is the highest legitimate law enforcement official in the land, and a jury of his (white male) peers the only legitimate government body. These beliefs are underpinned by the religion of Christian Identity , which claim white sovereigns are the direct descendants of the lost tribes of Israel, who on their long trek out of the Middle East made their way up through Scotland and Ireland over to the United States. Different facets of the nativist movement have enjoyed periodic heydeys in 20th-century America – first in the 1910s and 20s, when anti-immigrant sentiments were rife and membership in the Ku Klux Klan reached more than 2m. In the 1930s and 1940s, they penetrated the edges of the political mainstream through figures like Father Charles Coughlin, who was the Glenn Beck of his day . A Catholic priest and radio personality, Coughlin was at once enormously popular and virulently antisemitic and anti-New Deal. His ally Gerald LK Smith, leader of the Share Our Wealth campaign, was evocative of some of today’s more extreme Tea Party candidates. The Klans and related groups had another resurgence in response to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. In the 1980s, groups like the Posse, which drew together white supremacy and Christian Identity with anti-government “patriot” sentiments, found particularly fertile ground for recruitment among dispossessed Midwestern farmers. While figures like David Duke ran for political office, others, like the violent group The Order , carried out bombings, bank robberies and murders, and engaged in blazing shootouts with federal agents, all in service of their plan to build a white homeland. After the Oklahoma City bombing, with its perpetrators’ ties to the militia movement (and, most likely, to other far right groups as well), the movement tended to dig in further underground. Just as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were deemed to be acting alone, the periodic bursts of far right violence – whether they be an attempted bombing, the murder of an abortion doctor, attacks on undocumented immigrants or on Muslims, or the shooting of a congresswoman – are attributed to “lone wolves” rather than to organised plots by any particular group. Yet the distinction belies the reality of a movement that has long encouraged its adherents to act in “leaderless resistance” cells or carry out one-man guerrilla attacks (and become celebrated as “Phineas Priests”, named for the Bible story of a man who executed an interracial couple). The alleged MLK Day parade bomber, Kevin William Harpham, may or may not have consider himself a lone wolf if, as he is accused, he put together a backpack bomb laden with shrapnel dipped in rat poison to induce bleeding and placed it on the route of the parade. But there can be little doubt as to where his inspiration came from. Bill Morlin, formerly a reporter for the Spokane Spokesman-Review and now an independent investigator, traced Harpham’s background in a comprehensive report for the publication Hatewatch . In the military, Harpham was stationed at Fort Lewis in Washington, home base for 320 far right wingers. He was once a member of the racist far right National Alliance, and had left various postings on extremist websites suggesting he had had enough of the “international Jewish conspiracy”, which, among other things, he held responsible for 9/11. Leonard Zeskind, a leading expert on the radical far right and author, says that today, “the main tendency of organisations is mainstreaming … The movement imperative is towards the Tea Parties, running for office, anti-immigrant mongering – not roadside bombs.” None of this, of course, prevents people from being “recruited” to their ideas and choosing to act on them. One far right leader said much the same in an interview following the attempted bombing in Spokane. “There are many aspects to the white supremacist movement,” Shaun Winkler, Imperial Wizard of the White Knights of the KKK in Idaho, told a local television station . “There are those of us that are on the political side, and there are those of us that are revolutionary. It sounds as if this individual was on the revolutionary end rather than the political. And there are a lot of lone wolves out there. People that are sympathetic to us, but people that we don’t know.” Historically, federal law enforcement has given little credence to the power of the nativist current in American society, and has paid relatively little attention to the activities of nativist groups. That has perhaps changed since the election of Barack Obama, whose presidency has so focused and emboldened the racist far right. Yet, despite their obvious threat, there are no competitors to Peter King, holding congressional hearings on the recruitment of homegrown jihadist terrorists . The far right Global terrorism Tea Party movement US immigration Race issues Washington state James Ridgeway guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Call to allow tweeting in Commons

Rules governing Commons microblogging have been confused since deputy Speaker told MPs not to use Twitter to update followers from house Smartphones and iPads should be allowed into the chamber of the House of Commons, a committee report proposing to overthrow the ban on Twitter in parliament has said. The procedures committee has ruled that MPs should be allowed to use such electronic devices during parliamentary debates provided they are on silent and “used in a way that does not impair decorum” The new rules would also allow them to refer to electronic devices rather than paper notes when making speeches. The committee recommended keeping a ban on laptop computers or devices larger than A4 paper because of a lack of space in the crowded chamber. The committee chair Greg Knight, the MP for East Yorkshire, said the group had taken a “common sense approach” to modern technology that would stop MPs feeling obliged to miss chamber debates in order to catch up with vital emails. “In the modern age, it’s easy for your inbox to fill up but … [this measure] allows MPs to attend a debate and still keep an eye on their inbox as long as it doesn’t impair decorum. “At the moment, we have the odd situation where we can have a wad of notes an inch thick but, if you have your notes on an iPad, you can’t refer to them. We have to acknowledge the need for change.” But the debate has split MPs, with some warning that the changes could undermine the principle of parliamentary debate. The Conservative MP for North Wiltshire, James Gray, voted against the report, saying the changes could lead to a “worrying change in the atmosphere” in parliament. “The excessive use of any [electronic] device … could become an epidemic which would both be very unattractive to those observing our proceedings and also diminish the power of our debates,” he said. “MPs should be in the chamber of the House of Commons and in committee to listen carefully to arguments advanced by colleagues and be ready to intervene or reply in their own speeches.” Rules governing Commons microblogging have been confused since the deputy Speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, told MPs in January not to use Twitter to update their followers from the house. In its final report, the committee acknowledged that there were potential disadvantages to the changes if they were used inappropriately by lobbyists to influence members in the chamber. Knight also said there was a risk of embarrassment if MPs failed to act with discretion, adding: “Rightly, there would be an outcry if, whilst a minister was announcing deaths in Afghanistan, someone was tweeting about their holidays … but we are relying on the good sense of members. To pretend this [technology] doesn’t exist would just be backwards.” The report said 225 MPs now tweet, and the committee had received a large volume of correspondence during its consultation. The Commons will have to decide whether to accept the recommendations in a vote, which is expected to take place in the next eight weeks. If accepted, the changes proposed by the committee will be given a one-year trial. Twitter Internet House of Commons Rowenna Davis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US ‘kill team’ soldier sentenced

Jeremy Morlock receives 24 years in prison following plea deal to give evidence against fellow soldiers A US soldier who pleaded guilty to the murders of three Afghan civilians has been sentenced to 24 years in prison after saying “the plan was to kill people” in a conspiracy with four fellow soldiers. The military judge said he initially intended to sentence Jeremy Morlock to life in prison with possibility of parole but was bound by the plea deal. Morlock, the first of five soldiers from the 5th Stryker Brigade to be court-martialed in the case, will receive 352 days off of his sentence for time served and could be eligible for parole in about seven years, his attorney, Frank Spinner, said. He will be dishonourably discharged as part of his sentence. The 22-year-old is a key figure in a war crimes investigation that has raised some of the most serious criminal allegations to come out of the war in Afghanistan. Army investigators accused him of taking a lead role in the killings of three unarmed Afghan men in Kandahar province in January, February and May 2010. His sentencing came hours after he pleaded guilty on Wednesday to three counts of murder, and one count each of conspiracy, obstructing justice and illegal drug use at his court martial at the Lewis-McChord military base in Washington state. Under his plea deal, he has agreed to testify against his codefendants. Asked by the judge whether the plan was to shoot at people to scare them, or to shoot to kill, Morlock replied: “The plan was to kill people.” Speaking after the sentencing, Spinner read a statement prepared by Morlock in which the soldier apologised for the pain he had caused his victims’ families and the people of Afghanistan and asked for forgiveness from his fellow soldiers. The plea deal had been in place for nearly two months, so the sentence “wasn’t really a surprise” to Morlock, Spinner told reporters. Morlock told the judge that he and the other soldiers first began plotting to murder unarmed Afghans in late 2009, several weeks before the first killing took place. To make the killings appear justified, the soldiers planned to plant weapons near the bodies of the victims, he said. Morlock said he had second thoughts about the murder plot while home on leave in March 2010, after the first two killings. “It was really hard to come back,” he told the judge, adding that he no longer wanted to “engage or be part of anything” like the killings that had already occurred. Morlock said he did not voice his doubts to his fellow soldiers, however, and he went on to participate in the third killing in May. Morlock also admitted to smoking hashish while stationed in Afghanistan, though he said he was not under the influence of the drug at the time of the killings. In addition, he admitted to being one of six soldiers who assaulted a fellow platoon member after that man reported the drug use. Morlock, his voice shaking at times, told the judge he had asked himself “how I could become so insensitive and how I lost my moral compass”. “I don’t know if I will ever be able to answer those questions,” he said, adding that he believed he “wasn’t fully prepared for the reality of war as it was being fought in Afghanistan”. Earlier this week, the German news magazine Der Spiegel published three graphic photos showing Morlock and other soldiers posing with dead Afghans. One image features Morlock grinning as he lifts the head of a corpse by its hair. US military Afghanistan United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US ‘kill team’ soldier sentenced

Jeremy Morlock receives 24 years in prison following plea deal to give evidence against fellow soldiers A US soldier who pleaded guilty to the murders of three Afghan civilians has been sentenced to 24 years in prison after saying “the plan was to kill people” in a conspiracy with four fellow soldiers. The military judge said he initially intended to sentence Jeremy Morlock to life in prison with possibility of parole but was bound by the plea deal. Morlock, the first of five soldiers from the 5th Stryker Brigade to be court-martialed in the case, will receive 352 days off of his sentence for time served and could be eligible for parole in about seven years, his attorney, Frank Spinner, said. He will be dishonourably discharged as part of his sentence. The 22-year-old is a key figure in a war crimes investigation that has raised some of the most serious criminal allegations to come out of the war in Afghanistan. Army investigators accused him of taking a lead role in the killings of three unarmed Afghan men in Kandahar province in January, February and May 2010. His sentencing came hours after he pleaded guilty on Wednesday to three counts of murder, and one count each of conspiracy, obstructing justice and illegal drug use at his court martial at the Lewis-McChord military base in Washington state. Under his plea deal, he has agreed to testify against his codefendants. Asked by the judge whether the plan was to shoot at people to scare them, or to shoot to kill, Morlock replied: “The plan was to kill people.” Speaking after the sentencing, Spinner read a statement prepared by Morlock in which the soldier apologised for the pain he had caused his victims’ families and the people of Afghanistan and asked for forgiveness from his fellow soldiers. The plea deal had been in place for nearly two months, so the sentence “wasn’t really a surprise” to Morlock, Spinner told reporters. Morlock told the judge that he and the other soldiers first began plotting to murder unarmed Afghans in late 2009, several weeks before the first killing took place. To make the killings appear justified, the soldiers planned to plant weapons near the bodies of the victims, he said. Morlock said he had second thoughts about the murder plot while home on leave in March 2010, after the first two killings. “It was really hard to come back,” he told the judge, adding that he no longer wanted to “engage or be part of anything” like the killings that had already occurred. Morlock said he did not voice his doubts to his fellow soldiers, however, and he went on to participate in the third killing in May. Morlock also admitted to smoking hashish while stationed in Afghanistan, though he said he was not under the influence of the drug at the time of the killings. In addition, he admitted to being one of six soldiers who assaulted a fellow platoon member after that man reported the drug use. Morlock, his voice shaking at times, told the judge he had asked himself “how I could become so insensitive and how I lost my moral compass”. “I don’t know if I will ever be able to answer those questions,” he said, adding that he believed he “wasn’t fully prepared for the reality of war as it was being fought in Afghanistan”. Earlier this week, the German news magazine Der Spiegel published three graphic photos showing Morlock and other soldiers posing with dead Afghans. One image features Morlock grinning as he lifts the head of a corpse by its hair. US military Afghanistan United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US ‘kill team’ soldier sentenced

Jeremy Morlock receives 24 years in prison following plea deal to give evidence against fellow soldiers A US soldier who pleaded guilty to the murders of three Afghan civilians has been sentenced to 24 years in prison after saying “the plan was to kill people” in a conspiracy with four fellow soldiers. The military judge said he initially intended to sentence Jeremy Morlock to life in prison with possibility of parole but was bound by the plea deal. Morlock, the first of five soldiers from the 5th Stryker Brigade to be court-martialed in the case, will receive 352 days off of his sentence for time served and could be eligible for parole in about seven years, his attorney, Frank Spinner, said. He will be dishonourably discharged as part of his sentence. The 22-year-old is a key figure in a war crimes investigation that has raised some of the most serious criminal allegations to come out of the war in Afghanistan. Army investigators accused him of taking a lead role in the killings of three unarmed Afghan men in Kandahar province in January, February and May 2010. His sentencing came hours after he pleaded guilty on Wednesday to three counts of murder, and one count each of conspiracy, obstructing justice and illegal drug use at his court martial at the Lewis-McChord military base in Washington state. Under his plea deal, he has agreed to testify against his codefendants. Asked by the judge whether the plan was to shoot at people to scare them, or to shoot to kill, Morlock replied: “The plan was to kill people.” Speaking after the sentencing, Spinner read a statement prepared by Morlock in which the soldier apologised for the pain he had caused his victims’ families and the people of Afghanistan and asked for forgiveness from his fellow soldiers. The plea deal had been in place for nearly two months, so the sentence “wasn’t really a surprise” to Morlock, Spinner told reporters. Morlock told the judge that he and the other soldiers first began plotting to murder unarmed Afghans in late 2009, several weeks before the first killing took place. To make the killings appear justified, the soldiers planned to plant weapons near the bodies of the victims, he said. Morlock said he had second thoughts about the murder plot while home on leave in March 2010, after the first two killings. “It was really hard to come back,” he told the judge, adding that he no longer wanted to “engage or be part of anything” like the killings that had already occurred. Morlock said he did not voice his doubts to his fellow soldiers, however, and he went on to participate in the third killing in May. Morlock also admitted to smoking hashish while stationed in Afghanistan, though he said he was not under the influence of the drug at the time of the killings. In addition, he admitted to being one of six soldiers who assaulted a fellow platoon member after that man reported the drug use. Morlock, his voice shaking at times, told the judge he had asked himself “how I could become so insensitive and how I lost my moral compass”. “I don’t know if I will ever be able to answer those questions,” he said, adding that he believed he “wasn’t fully prepared for the reality of war as it was being fought in Afghanistan”. Earlier this week, the German news magazine Der Spiegel published three graphic photos showing Morlock and other soldiers posing with dead Afghans. One image features Morlock grinning as he lifts the head of a corpse by its hair. US military Afghanistan United States guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bodies found in O’Callaghan search

Man, 47, arrested as police find two dead, one believed to be missing Swindon woman Police searching for Sian O’Callaghan , who disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon last week, have said they have found two bodies, including one which is thought to be O’Callaghan. A 47-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and two murders, officers told a news conference. Detective superintendent Steve Fulcher said: “The location of two bodies have been identified to me, one of whom has yet to be identified formally, but I am quite clear is Sian. “I have informed Sian’s family, who are obviously deeply distressed, and I would ask to give them time and space to come to terms with what’s happened. Police reportedly arrested the suspect outside an Asda in Swindon. A green Toyota was also taken away on the back of a trailer. Meanwhile, police began searching a house in Ashbury Avenue, Swindon. Neighbours said the man who lived there was a cab driver who drove a green taxi. A white police tent was erected in the front garden of the semi-detached house, which was cordoned off and had three police vans parked outside Sian, aged 22, disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon on Saturday in the early hours. Police have been combing the Savernake forest 12 miles away. Analysis of O’Callaghan’s mobile phone records suggests that about 30 minutes after she left the club, her phone was somewhere in the 1,800-hectare (4,500-acre) Savernake forest, near Marlborough. O’Callaghan, an office administrator, was caught on CCTV leaving the nightclub, in Swindon’s Old Town area, after an evening out with friends. She lived in a flat just half a mile away with her boyfriend Kevin Reape, 25. O’Callaghan’s family thanked the public for their help in the search for “our beautiful girl”. In a statement released by police they said: “We have been so touched by the support shown by the community that we wanted to express our thanks. “The sheer numbers of people who have given up their time to help search for Sian and distribute appeal posters are overwhelming and we couldn’t ask for better support from the public, police and media.” Crime Police Steven Morris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bodies found in O’Callaghan search

Man, 47, arrested as police find two dead, one believed to be missing Swindon woman Police searching for Sian O’Callaghan , who disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon last week, have said they have found two bodies, including one which is thought to be O’Callaghan. A 47-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and two murders, officers told a news conference. Detective superintendent Steve Fulcher said: “The location of two bodies have been identified to me, one of whom has yet to be identified formally, but I am quite clear is Sian. “I have informed Sian’s family, who are obviously deeply distressed, and I would ask to give them time and space to come to terms with what’s happened. Police reportedly arrested the suspect outside an Asda in Swindon. A green Toyota was also taken away on the back of a trailer. Meanwhile, police began searching a house in Ashbury Avenue, Swindon. Neighbours said the man who lived there was a cab driver who drove a green taxi. A white police tent was erected in the front garden of the semi-detached house, which was cordoned off and had three police vans parked outside Sian, aged 22, disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon on Saturday in the early hours. Police have been combing the Savernake forest 12 miles away. Analysis of O’Callaghan’s mobile phone records suggests that about 30 minutes after she left the club, her phone was somewhere in the 1,800-hectare (4,500-acre) forest, near Marlborough. O’Callaghan, an office administrator, was caught on CCTV leaving the nightclub in Swindon’s Old Town area, after an evening out with friends. She lived in a flat just half a mile away with her boyfriend Kevin Reape, 25. O’Callaghan’s family thanked the public for their help in the search for “our beautiful girl”. In a statement released by police they said: “We have been so touched by the support shown by the community that we wanted to express our thanks. “The sheer numbers of people who have given up their time to help search for Sian and distribute appeal posters are overwhelming and we couldn’t ask for better support from the public, police and media.” Crime Police Steven Morris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bodies found in O’Callaghan search

Man, 47, arrested as police find two dead, one believed to be missing Swindon woman Police searching for Sian O’Callaghan , who disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon last week, have said they have found two bodies, including one which is thought to be O’Callaghan. A 47-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and two murders, officers told a news conference. Detective superintendent Steve Fulcher said: “The location of two bodies have been identified to me, one of whom has yet to be identified formally, but I am quite clear is Sian. “I have informed Sian’s family, who are obviously deeply distressed, and I would ask to give them time and space to come to terms with what’s happened. Police reportedly arrested the suspect outside an Asda in Swindon. A green Toyota was also taken away on the back of a trailer. Meanwhile, police began searching a house in Ashbury Avenue, Swindon. Neighbours said the man who lived there was a cab driver who drove a green taxi. A white police tent was erected in the front garden of the semi-detached house, which was cordoned off and had three police vans parked outside Sian, aged 22, disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon on Saturday in the early hours. Police have been combing the Savernake forest 12 miles away. Analysis of O’Callaghan’s mobile phone records suggests that about 30 minutes after she left the club, her phone was somewhere in the 1,800-hectare (4,500-acre) forest, near Marlborough. O’Callaghan, an office administrator, was caught on CCTV leaving the nightclub in Swindon’s Old Town area, after an evening out with friends. She lived in a flat just half a mile away with her boyfriend Kevin Reape, 25. O’Callaghan’s family thanked the public for their help in the search for “our beautiful girl”. In a statement released by police they said: “We have been so touched by the support shown by the community that we wanted to express our thanks. “The sheer numbers of people who have given up their time to help search for Sian and distribute appeal posters are overwhelming and we couldn’t ask for better support from the public, police and media.” Crime Police Steven Morris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

There’s no sign of Speaker John Boehner’s promised “jobs, jobs, jobs.” Instead, extremist teabagger Republicans are busily trying to take care of the already-rich, kick people when they’re down, and further weaken the ability of those who do have jobs to strike against employers: All around the country, right-wing legislators are asking middle class Americans to pay for budget deficits caused mainly by a recession caused by Wall Street; they are attacking workers’ collective bargaining rights, which has provoked a huge Main Street Movement to fight back. Now, a group of House Republicans is launching a new stealth attack against union workers. GOP Reps. Jim Jordan (OH), Tim Scott (SC), Scott Garrett (NJ), Dan Burton (IN), and Louie Gohmert (TX) have introduced H.R. 1135, which states that it is designed to “provide information on total spending on means-tested welfare programs, to provide additional work requirements, and to provide an overall spending limit on means-tested welfare programs.” Much of the bill is based upon verifying that those who receive food stamps benefits are meeting the federal requirements for doing so. However, one section buried deep within the bill adds a startling new requirement. The bill, if passed, would actually cut off all food stamp benefits to any family where one adult member is engaging in a strike against an employer. The bill also includes a provision that would exempt households from losing eligibility, “if the household was eligible immediately prior to such strike, however, such family unit shall not receive an increased allotment as the result of a decrease in the income of the striking member or members of the household.” Yet removing entire families from eligibility while a single adult family member is striking would have a chilling effect on workers who are considering going on strike for better wages, benefits, or working conditions — something that is especially alarming in light of the fact that unions are one of the fundamental building blocks of the middle class that allow people to earn wages that keep them off food stamps . But here’s the punchline: Striking workers have been ineligible for food stamps for years . (The only way a striker is eligible right now is if you met the eligibility standards before you went on strike — and if you belong to a union, odds are, you didn’t.) So not only are teabagger Republicans just plain mean and pandering to special interests, they’re stupid to boot! Their bill also rolls back back spending on government assistance programs back to 2007 levels, plus inflation, once unemployment falls below 6.5 percent. (Well, at least we know that won’t be anytime soon!) New Jersey’s Rep. Scott Garrett, a teabagger hero, is also busy trying to slash funding for the SEC – but denies that he’s doing it. (Says the fact that its spending has gone up so much since the market crash proves the agency has plenty of funding, thank you very much!) Oh, and he’s one of the Republicans who voted against extending the budget. He’s also the guy who’s pushing for every bill to show “constitutional authority” for why Congress has the right to pass the bill. Rep. Jim Jordan, the other person who wants to kick voters when they’re down? Was he working on “jobs, jobs, jobs”? Nope. He’s chair of the extremist Republican Study Committee , a caucus that exists to push House Republicans Further. To. The. Right. Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN) wasn’t working on “jobs, jobs, jobs,” either. He voted against the budget extension, too. Instead, he introduced a nasty little states-right bill: “Last week, President Obama made an unprecedented decision to declare a Federal law unconstitutional and thereby abdicate his own constitutional responsibility to uphold and defend that law. Activist judges, and now an activist President, have been trying to unilaterally define marriage for too long. This issue should instead be decided once and for all by the American people and the states. “That is why I have introduced the “Marriage Protection Act” which simply states that no Federal Courts will have jurisdiction to hear cases regarding same-sex marriage . Instead, the definition of same-sex unions would be determined by the people through their State legislatures or via referendum. And he also sponsored a bill that would strip President Obama “of his power to waive a law requiring him to move the embassy to Jerusalem.” Rep. Louis Gohmert? He’s from Texas and the author of the famous “terror babies” story. A real American! Last but not least, South Carolina’s Rep. Tim Scott. The poor guy’s really got to prove himself – first, because he voted for the continuing resolution that extended the budget for three weeks, but also because he’s a black Republican. So he’s a member of the Club for Growth, plus he just introduced the Rising Tides Act of 2011. And what does it do, exactly? It cuts the corporate income tax rate by 10% on companies making more than $10 million annually. Where on earth are those jobs, jobs, jobs?

Continue reading …

There’s no sign of Speaker John Boehner’s promised “jobs, jobs, jobs.” Instead, extremist teabagger Republicans are busily trying to take care of the already-rich, kick people when they’re down, and further weaken the ability of those who do have jobs to strike against employers: All around the country, right-wing legislators are asking middle class Americans to pay for budget deficits caused mainly by a recession caused by Wall Street; they are attacking workers’ collective bargaining rights, which has provoked a huge Main Street Movement to fight back. Now, a group of House Republicans is launching a new stealth attack against union workers. GOP Reps. Jim Jordan (OH), Tim Scott (SC), Scott Garrett (NJ), Dan Burton (IN), and Louie Gohmert (TX) have introduced H.R. 1135, which states that it is designed to “provide information on total spending on means-tested welfare programs, to provide additional work requirements, and to provide an overall spending limit on means-tested welfare programs.” Much of the bill is based upon verifying that those who receive food stamps benefits are meeting the federal requirements for doing so. However, one section buried deep within the bill adds a startling new requirement. The bill, if passed, would actually cut off all food stamp benefits to any family where one adult member is engaging in a strike against an employer. The bill also includes a provision that would exempt households from losing eligibility, “if the household was eligible immediately prior to such strike, however, such family unit shall not receive an increased allotment as the result of a decrease in the income of the striking member or members of the household.” Yet removing entire families from eligibility while a single adult family member is striking would have a chilling effect on workers who are considering going on strike for better wages, benefits, or working conditions — something that is especially alarming in light of the fact that unions are one of the fundamental building blocks of the middle class that allow people to earn wages that keep them off food stamps . But here’s the punchline: Striking workers have been ineligible for food stamps for years . (The only way a striker is eligible right now is if you met the eligibility standards before you went on strike — and if you belong to a union, odds are, you didn’t.) So not only are teabagger Republicans just plain mean and pandering to special interests, they’re stupid to boot! Their bill also rolls back back spending on government assistance programs back to 2007 levels, plus inflation, once unemployment falls below 6.5 percent. (Well, at least we know that won’t be anytime soon!) New Jersey’s Rep. Scott Garrett, a teabagger hero, is also busy trying to slash funding for the SEC – but denies that he’s doing it. (Says the fact that its spending has gone up so much since the market crash proves the agency has plenty of funding, thank you very much!) Oh, and he’s one of the Republicans who voted against extending the budget. He’s also the guy who’s pushing for every bill to show “constitutional authority” for why Congress has the right to pass the bill. Rep. Jim Jordan, the other person who wants to kick voters when they’re down? Was he working on “jobs, jobs, jobs”? Nope. He’s chair of the extremist Republican Study Committee , a caucus that exists to push House Republicans Further. To. The. Right. Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN) wasn’t working on “jobs, jobs, jobs,” either. He voted against the budget extension, too. Instead, he introduced a nasty little states-right bill: “Last week, President Obama made an unprecedented decision to declare a Federal law unconstitutional and thereby abdicate his own constitutional responsibility to uphold and defend that law. Activist judges, and now an activist President, have been trying to unilaterally define marriage for too long. This issue should instead be decided once and for all by the American people and the states. “That is why I have introduced the “Marriage Protection Act” which simply states that no Federal Courts will have jurisdiction to hear cases regarding same-sex marriage . Instead, the definition of same-sex unions would be determined by the people through their State legislatures or via referendum. And he also sponsored a bill that would strip President Obama “of his power to waive a law requiring him to move the embassy to Jerusalem.” Rep. Louis Gohmert? He’s from Texas and the author of the famous “terror babies” story. A real American! Last but not least, South Carolina’s Rep. Tim Scott. The poor guy’s really got to prove himself – first, because he voted for the continuing resolution that extended the budget for three weeks, but also because he’s a black Republican. So he’s a member of the Club for Growth, plus he just introduced the Rising Tides Act of 2011. And what does it do, exactly? It cuts the corporate income tax rate by 10% on companies making more than $10 million annually. Where on earth are those jobs, jobs, jobs?

Continue reading …