Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1558)

In the lead-up to the Iraq War, the media “hammered Bush” about getting congressional approval, NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell noted on last night's “Hannity” during the “Media Mash” segment. Yet such scrutiny has been missing in President Obama's actions on Libya, he noted. What's more, the media have failed to press Obama on violating his own standards on presidential use of military force: Here's the reality. Barack Obama on the campaign trail said that the president had no constitutional right to declare military action without congressional approval. Joe Biden thundered on the campaign trail that if Bush ever tried doing something like this without congressional approval, he would lead impeachment hearings against them.

Continue reading …
The scourge of lawyers good and bad

Rick Kordowski remains unapologetic over the website he set up as the result of his treatment by lawyers which he claims cost him £750,000 “I’ve no particular problems with the legal industry as a whole. One of my best friends is a solicitor.” Such magnanimity might dangerously raise the blood pressure of lawyers when they realise the view expressed is from Rick Kordowski, owner of solicitorsfromhell.com , scourge of all dodgy lawyers and perfectly decent ones that have the misfortune of falling into his notoriously non-discriminating net. Mr Justice Lloyd Jones last month lambasted the hugely controversial website – which seeks to name and shame “corrupt, negligent, dishonest, crooked, fraudulent lawyers” – for comments about a young solicitor that were, he said, “baseless, abusive, malicious and an unwarranted slur on the competency and probity of a young lawyer”. The lawyer in question was awarded £10,000 in damages. The judge was particularly vexed by the site’s £299 “administration charge” that lawyers have pay to get their names taken off the website. It’s not hard to understand why Kordowski has become the law’s bête noire. The Law Society’s chief executive, Desmond Hudson, says that “fair criticism” is “entirely valid” and that the need for clients to be able to give feedback is “extremely important”. “However from all we have seen, what this website is about is simply a blanket characterisation of all legal professionals as corrupt, and providing a vehicle for pursuing personal grudges and vendettas.” I spoke to Kordowski last week. Was there something uniquely dreadful about lawyers to target them in this way, I asked. “Probably not. The same criticisms could probably be made about accountants, bankers, builders …” His motivation for setting up the site, which has been running for five years, was his treatment at the hands of lawyers. The Essex-based self-employed graphic designer claims to have lost £750,000 after being negligently advised on a planning dispute. He was vague about the details of the case (“it’s complicated”). “It devastated me. I lost everything … house, job, money, the whole shooting match.” He claims to have received £500 compensation through the Law Society’s complaints handling process as a result of professional negligence. What would he say to the many lawyers appalled, perhaps devastated, by unfounded criticism placed on his site? “Go back to your client, or whoever complained about you, and sort out your differences,” he replied. Why doesn’t he vet claims? Kordowski said that he once did try checking with firms before publishing. “Everyone denied the allegations and so I don’t do it any more.” He told me that now people have to set up a PayPal account before they list a complaint. “So I have the pukka details. If it reads OK, and they’re happy with my terms and conditions, I generally publish.” When I suggested to Kordowski, who has a number of legal actions from aggrieved lawyers against him, that he be must either be “brave or suicidal” to bait lawyers, he replied: “Not really, I have nothing to lose in terms of cash or assets.” And what about that “admin charge”? No one ever pays it, he insists. “It’s a publicity stunt. I was on the front page of the Law Society’s Gazette a few months ago … so it does work!” The site now has a solicitorsfromheaven service where web users can find “good, decent, fighting, professional, passionate lawyers”. There are some 200 firms listed including 10 who, Kordowski tells me, have paid £299 for a lifetime listing (“that includes a ban from hell”) supported by client testimonial. “It’s a website for the people. There are a lot of solicitor directories out – normally, the firms write their own testimonials. The difference with my site – both heaven and hell – it’s purely driven by the public, good or bad.” That is why the solicitorfromhell phenomenon – Kordowski reckons it gets 2,500 hits a day – can’t be dismissed, certainly not in the context of the ongoing deregulation of legal services. It meets a demand. “While he may have run his site a tad carelessly, the fact that he got 5,000 submissions from punters suggests there is something in it,” blogged legal academic John Flood. The Legal Services Act 2007 was not introduced as a result of an evangelical belief in the transformative powers of competition. It was as much to do with the profession’s woeful track record on complaints that kick-started the whole Clementi business . As we head towards 6 October which will (theoretically) unleash those powers of competition under the LSA by allowing non-law businesses (the Co-Op, Halifax, Which? et al) to move further into legal services, the big question is how on earth do consumers choose between the “heaven” and “hell” of legal services? At the moment they don’t, according to a recent report from the Legal Services Board (Quality in Legal Services, Legal Services Consumer Panel), which confirmed that “quality” was “not strongly influencing consumers”. That was “bad for competition” as quality firms couldn’t differentiate themselves from poorer rivals. “We put ourselves in their hands and, because they are qualified and they are professionals, we just hope and presume that they going to give us the right information and do the job for us,” said one interviewee. It’s hardly the view of the empowered consumer. The legal services market is already seeing a wave of comparethemarket.com-style sites anticipating the newly competitive environment. Welcome innovations, I reckon, although they seem price-driven. What the market needs is Tripadvisor-style sites (plus online sources of reliable information signposting them towards trusted sources of help) so that people can make an informed decision. There’s not much point in competition if you can’t make a choice. Expect more. A footnote: when I spoke to Kordowski he mentioned that there were lawyers, even judges, who believed his site had “a purpose in society”? Who, I asked. This led me to talk to Mark Manley, a defamation lawyer at the Liverpool Brabners Chaffe Street Solicitors. It turns out Manley himself (a deputy district judge) was listed on solicitorsfromhell. Not by his own client but by the other side’s. Clearly it’s not the responsibility of a lawyer to keep the opposition happy (it’s arguably the sign of a good one that they don’t). Manley contacted Kordowski and threatened to sue unless his details were removed. He got the usual response (an invitation to pay the £299 admin fee). Manley wasn’t having it. He insisted he would take action without delay “whatever the financial consequences for you”. Kordowski, after asking for confirmation that he didn’t act for the complainant, agreed. Manley was then astonished to get another email from Kordowski asking for his help in his capacity as a defamation lawyer. “You have to admire the opportunism,” Manley tells me. The solicitor, despite having to force him to take down the comments, was prepared to offer generic advice to avoid future problems. Anyhow, what does Manley, a victim of the site, make of it? “It is a shame that some basic safeguards don’t operate because the intention – a consumer-based website to enable members of the public to make legitimate statements about service – is good. Unfortunately, currently there appears no control to prevent somebody making indiscriminate unjustified and/or false allegations against a solicitor – whether they had a service from them or not.” Jon Robins is a freelance journalist and director of the research company Jures . It is due to publish a collection of essays (with the Advice Services Alliance) on public legal education next month. Solicitors Consumer affairs Alternative Business Structures Jon Robins guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
London 2012: Ten best of the web

Oscar Pistorius, ticketing guides and Visa’s new Olympics ad 490 days to go As promised , here is this week’s selection of the best London 2012 Olympics content on the web (please add links below the line or send via email or Twitter . 1. Top 10 Olympic travel tips from Diamon Geezer . He also has a pretty good ticket guide (Via Owen Gibson ) 2. There’s an (unofficial) app for that . 3. Visa has a London 2012 ad featuring plenty of Olympic stars. Eat your heart out Mastercard. Oliver Holt in the Mirror had this to say about it. (Via Penny Woods ) 4. Worried about staying in London during the Games? Matt Beard of the London Evening Standard reports: “Top hotel chains in crisis talks with 2012 Olympics organisers over ‘rip-off’ re-sale packages.” 5. Have you looked at the terms and conditions of Olympic Tickets ? Nick Pearce did and here’s what he found . 6. Oscar Pistorius’ dream of running in theOlympic Games at London 2012 moved a step closer when the South African set a new personal best, just 0.06 seconds short of the ‘A’ standard needed for automatic Olympic qualification, reports the BBC . 7. Want to know more about the BOA v Locog row? This piece by Alan Hubbard uses boxing metaphors to explain. (Via Owen Gibson again) 8. The mountain-biking arena is ready . 9. Should handball be an Olympic sport? There was a brief but entertaining below the line debate on our Watching The Games series . 10. For 2012 refuseniks, here’s an apposite cartoon from the Daily Telegraph’s Matt . (Via Chei Amlani ) Please share your thoughts or more links below the line or send via email or Twitter . Olympic Games 2012 Olympics 2012: Handball Steve Busfield guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Nissan Leaf falls into UK showrooms

High hopes for green motoring as UK’s first mass-produced electric vehicle hits dealerships • Testdriving the Nissan Leaf Their sometimes clunky designs, short range between recharges and super-car price tags have put many drivers off buying an electric car. But that could soon change with the launch of the UK’s first mass-produced electric vehicle. The Nissan Leaf, an all-electric family car with the performance of a Ford Focus but a fraction of the greenhouse gas emissions, is delivered to UK dealerships today. More than 600 fans of greener driving have been waiting since last September to get their hands on the Leaf, one of only a handful of electric vehicles available in the UK. Mark Goodier, the Smooth Radio DJ, is one of the first. “The great thing about electric cars is that the fuel distribution is already in place,” he said. “We all have mains electricity at home. We have it at work and councils are already working on how to install thousands of charging points at the roadside. You can see why electric vehicles make such sense, particularly in towns and cities.” At £30,990, the Leaf is at the expensive end of the family car budget, but drivers can claim a £5,000 government grant towards the cost . They are also exempt from road tax and congestion charges, and if it is used as a company car, it is not taxed as a benefit-in-kind and the employer pays no national insurance contributions on it. A full charge will last for about 110 miles, Nissan calculates, and cost about £2 in electricity. That compares with about £12 for 110 miles for a petrol-driven car of a similar size. Even with George Osborne’s budget give-away to “Ford Focus families”, in the form of a 1p cut to fuel duty announced on Wednesday , switching to an electric car is likely to save the average driver more than £1,500 a year. Ministers are hoping that the wider availability of electric cars will help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport, which will be essential to meeting climate change targets. They also hope to spark investment in a new manufacturing industry. While the Leafs being driven out of dealerships this week were built in Japan, from 2013 they will be built at the Nissan plant in Sunderland . Other electric cars available in the UK include the Mitsubishi i-MiEV, the Smart Fortwo electric drive, the Peugeot iOn and Citroen C-Zero, but some are limited to leasing deals at present. More are scheduled to follow, including the Chevrolet Volt and Tata Vista. But the electric “revolution” in driving has got off to a slow start. Only 55 electric cars were sold in the UK in 2009, though that was before the government’s new grants took effect. The government’s climate advisers, the Committee on Climate Change , says the country needs 1.7m of them on the roads by 2020 to help meet the country’s tough carbon targets. This year is not likely to prove a breakthrough, despite the new cars reaching garages, according to Andrew Close, European manager for powertrain forecasts at IHS Global Insight. “It might be the first year people notice electric cars driving around – normal people rather than G-Wiz owners,” he said. “But 2011 will not see any breakthrough in volume [of cars on the road], though it will be a considerable jump from before. 2011 is way too early, £5,000 or not – the vehicles are expensive, constrained in supply and there are still too many good [conventional car] alternatives.” Fans of greener cars are happy with their expanded choice, though. Richard Todd, a silicon chip designer from St Albans, used to drive a Toyota Prius, a hybrid half-electric and half-petrol car. “As an engineer I have always wanted an electric car – I’ve just had to wait for the battery technology to arrive,” he said. “Hybrids are good but the driving experience of an all-electric vehicle is way beyond this.” A comprehensive charging network is currently under development in the UK, and Nissan’s network of EV dealers – currently 26 sites nationwide – will be equipped with a quick charger, which will charge the battery from zero to 80% capacity in under 30 minutes. Across the UK there are programmes under way to install around 9,000 charge points by 2013. Electric, hybrid and low-emission cars Carbon emissions Travel and transport Ethical and green living Motoring Fiona Harvey Adam Vaughan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘Night stalker’ jailed for life

Judge tells Delroy Grant his crimes are ‘in a league of their own’ and says he should face possibility he may die in prison The serial sex attacker Delroy Grant has been sentenced to life in prison for the 17 years of terror in which he attacked at least 203 elderly people in their homes. The “night stalker” will serve at least 27 years and was warned by the judge that he could die in prison. Grant, 53, who was convicted at Woolwich crown court, London, on Thursday of 29 charges relating to burglaries, attempted burglaries, rapes and indecent assaults against 18 elderly people between October 1992 and November 2009, was told by Judge Peter Rook: “Your offending is in a league of its own.” The Metropolitan police force has apologised for blunders which led to 146 attacks being committed after he should have been arrested . The judge told Grant, a former minicab driver, he was a “very dangerous man capable of committing heinous crimes and causing incalculable harm”. “You targeted elderly victims living alone. Your actions blighted the remaining precious years of their lives. Their homes, where many of them had lived for years, should have been their safest refuge where they could have expected to live their lives undisturbed and at peace. “You chose to invade their homes when they were in their beds at night. It’s hard to imagine the extreme fear that the feel of your gloved hand and the sight of your masked figure looming above them must have been felt by your victims in their beds.” The court also heard statements on Friday from Grant’s victims and their families about the impact of his crimes. One 85-year-old woman, referred to as Miss J for legal reasons, said she still continued to suffer from her ordeal nearly nine years ago. She was 77 when Grant burgled and indecently assaulted her at her bungalow in Shirley, Croydon, in October 2002. In a statement from 2003, she said: “I have found that time is not a great healer. I don’t think it’s got any easier over the last year. I certainly haven’t got back my peace of mind. Nobody can guarantee it won’t happen again.” Asked by the judge if her experiences at Grant’s hands still affected her, Miss J replied: “If I go out I like to be home before dark. I do a lot of locking and bolting, and taking precautions … It changed my life.” The judge paid tribute to Miss J’s “courageous” testimony and quoted from the son of another of Grant’s victims, who said: “It has ruined the winter years of my mother’s life, and she has to live with this for the rest of her life.” Grant received four life sentences for three rapes and one attempted rape of elderly women. He was also given concurrent eight-year sentences for seven indecent assaults, and concurrent six-year sentences for 18 burglaries and attempted burglaries. Courtenay Griffiths QC, defending, offered no mitigation for Grant other than to point out that his age meant he would probably spend the rest of his life in jail. The judge noted that in all but one case Grant targeted elderly people living alone, suggesting that his attacks involved considerable planning. He said: “Your offending spans a period of 17 years. Five London boroughs were affected by your offending. During that period your activities must have terrified a whole community, as your counsel accepted. “Thousands of people in south London have been living in fear that they might be your next victim.” Crime James Meikle guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Nato considers taking over Libya war

Decision likely before foreign ministers from countries involved in anti-Gaddafi campaign gather for crucial conference in London Nato’s 28 countries are to decide within days whether to assume overall control of the military campaign against Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, thus allowing the US to step back. France and Turkey, at loggerheads over whether authority for the campaign should be vested in Nato, agreed on Friday that the alliance should take control in what was a climbdown by Paris. The US and UK also agreed. Arguments over who should supplant a reluctant America in charge of the air campaign against Gaddafi have raged since the operations were launched last weekend, opening up major transatlantic divisions and splits among the Europeans. Any deal has to be rubberstamped by all 28 countries. Late on Thursday, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary-general, announced that the alliance would assume control of the UN-mandated no-fly zone but that the campaign of air strikes on ground targets would remain outside Nato authority and be run by the “coalition of the willing” taking part. The United Arab Emirates has said the Gulf federation would send 12 aircraft – six F16s and six Mirages – to help patrol the no-fly zone, joining Qatar as the only members of the 22-member Arab League to publicly commit forces to the military operation. Overnight air strikes were launched on Gaddafi forces in and around Ajdabiya according to France’s chief of defence staff, Admiral Edouard Guillaud. A plane destroyed an artillery battery and French forces also destroyed a military base, a munitions depot and maintenance facilities in Libya’s interior. Defence secretary Liam Fox said British Tornado GR4 aircraft had launched several guided missiles at Libyan armoured vehicles: “The Tornado aircraft launched a number of guided Brimstone missiles at Libyan armoured vehicles which were threatening the civilian population of Ajdabiya.” He added: “Brimstone is a high precision, low collateral damage weapon optimised against demanding and mobile targets.” The African Union, in a rare apparent criticism of Gaddafi, has also called for a transition period for Libya during which democratic elections could be held. “The AU action is moving forward in a resolute political process aiming at facilitating dialogue between the Libyan parties on reforms to be launched to eliminate the root causes of the conflict … that should end with the election of democratic institutions,” the union’s commission chairman, Jean Ping, said in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Oana Lungescu, the Nato spokeswoman, said on Friday morning that the 28 ambassadors in Nato’s policymaking North Atlantic council had decided “to actively consider” assuming authority for the air-strike operations, the most contentious and divisive aspect of the campaign. Turkey and Germany, key Nato members, oppose air strikes on ground targets. Ankara wants Nato to take command and control of the air strikes campaign, meaning that the Turks would have greater influence and even a veto over the air strikes, since Nato operates by consensus. All the signs were that a Nato decision would be made by Tuesday 29 March when the foreign ministers from all those involved in the anti-Gaddafi campaign gather for a crucial conference in London. There are three main elements to the military offensive against Gaddafi stemming from UN security council resolutions – a no-fly zone, an arms embargo and the air strikes on ground targets based on the “right to protect”, safeguarding civilians in Libya from massacre. Nato is now in charge of the no-fly zone and the arms embargo, policed from a flotilla in the Mediterranean. The big bone of contention is the air strikes. A Nato officer suggested the problem may fade because of developments on the ground. “The majority of those missions have been successful and may be close to completion,” he said. Nato officers said on Friday that the timing of the handover from US to alliance control of the no-fly zone was unclear, but it would probably take 48 hours. The Nato operations are to be steered from Nato’s joint force command in Naples, while the nerve centre for the no-fly-zone air sorties will be a combat air operations centre in Izmir, Turkey. Libya Nato Middle East US military Muammar Gaddafi African Union Qatar United Arab Emirates United States Military Liam Fox Ian Traynor James Meikle guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Wisconsin Dems are pretty confident they’re going to take back control of the Senate, and I have to agree. Now that voters have seen what’s on Gov. Scott Walker’s agenda, I don’t think they’re going to want to hand him a rubber-stamp Republican senate: Twenty days into a recall campaign spurred by the state’s rollicking budget fight, Wisconsin Democrats are now predicting that they will be able to take back control of the state Senate this summer. Statewide, Democrats say they have over fifty percent of the number of petitions they need to recall eight Republican state senators, although they are not over the fifty percent threshold in every district. “We’re well ahead of schedule,” said Graeme Zielinski, Wisconsin Democratic Party spokesman. “I think in mid-summer, you will have a Democratic Senate.” The party would not release detailed percentages of where the party stood in each targeted seat. To recall a state senator, petitioners must collect signatures equal to one-quarter of votes from that senator’s district in the last gubernatorial race within a 60-day window. There are petitions out for all 16 state senators currently eligible to be recalled (anyone who has served for more than a year) — and that includes Republicans and Democrats. ( Here’s a handy list , along with the number of signatures needed in every district). Once recall petitions are filed and deemed valid, a special election would be held in six weeks time. Republicans control the Senate by a 19-14 margin, meaning Democrats need to flip three seats to take over. Of the Republicans targeted, two — Mary Lazich and Glenn Grothman — are in solidly Republican districts and are likely safe. State Sen. Dan Kapanke seems to be the most vulnerable; his district went 61 percent for President Obama in 2008. The other recall districts went for Obama but by smaller margins. Of those, Randy Hopper and Luther Olsen are viewed by Democratic strategists as particularly good targets. Hopper, for one, is fighting back aggressively. He’s hired Jeff Harvey, a veteran Republican strategist who has previously worked for Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) and Gov. Chris Christie (R-N.J.). “We have volunteer centers opening up and we have a lot of volunteer efforts throughout the district and we’re making phone calls, going door to door,” said Harvey. “What we’re hearing on the ground is that people are extremely supportive.” You remember the aptly named “Randy” Hopper. This is the family values guy whose midlife crisis consisted of dumping his wife and moving in with his much-younger lobbyist girlfriend — and then she suddenly and coincidentally got a well-paying state job. Yeah, I’m sure the people of Wisconsin will flock to his aid.

Continue reading …
Major Garrett Says He’s ‘Militantly Non-Partisan’–But Sounds Like Obama Flack

No wonder he left Fox News . . . On Morning Joe, Major Garrett, formerly of Fox News, now with the National Journal, claimed to be “militantly non-partisan” . . . then proceeded to offer a passionate defense of Pres. Obama's Libya policy. As an hors d'oeuvre during the discussion of the need for the media to acknowledge their leanings, Katrina vanden Heuvel risibly refused to admit that her Nation magazine is left-wing. View video after the jump. Garrett repeatedly put his defense of the Obama policy in the mouths of Hillary Clinton and other administration figures.

Continue reading …
A roadmap to 21st-century equality

We need a revolution in our expectations to place equality at the heart of a new development paradigm • Madeleine Bunting: What will aid look like in 2031? In the 20th century, increased production was a fairly successful response to absolute poverty, which had been the lot of most of the human race for most of history. But in the 21st century, that path has come to a dead end, as the planet reaches its resource limits. A more equal distribution of wealth needs to return to the centre of development theory. There are many types of poverty but the one most people associate with international development is the absolute kind. If you are likely to die in childbirth, or your kids can’t go to school because they have to work, or you don’t eat enough food every day to keep your body functioning properly, then you are poor in this absolute sense. Absolute poverty declined faster in the last century than it has at any time in human history. It has been eradicated in the 60 or so high-income countries, and reduced to pockets in most of the almost 50 upper middle-income countries. Crucially, it has reduced in most poor countries too. After the lost decade of the 1980s, the recent reports on the millennium development goals show that the last couple of decades in particular have shown great gains in human development (although the poorest, as ever, aren’t doing as well as the richest). But these gains are under threat. To understand the future of development we have to look briefly at its history. In the early days of economics, when Adam Smith , David Ricardo and Thomas Robert Malthus were laying down the foundations of a new social science, the study of inequality (ie the distribution of wealth) was paramount. Economic theory suggested that working men and women would live on or around the poverty line as a consequence of the accumulation of capital and the need to keep wages low. Redistribution, however unlikely (Karl Marx thought it would require revolution), was the only way to address this inevitable and widespread poverty. But when I studied economics a few years ago, I had to ask the lecturers to add a session on inequality to the curriculum. One of the broader-minded professors agreed, but they still wouldn’t include a question on it in the exam. It had simply fallen off the curriculum of modern economists. Why? Because the early economists’ predictions turned out to be wrong on this. Capitalism in industrialising societies led to significant gains in the living standards of the average person. Working people started to worry less about equality when it became clear just how much their lives were improving. So economics – and development – became about how to grow production, and equality became a forgotten area of study. The political struggles for more just societies played their part in ensuring that the fruits of wealth were better shared, and life would have been even better for the poor had struggles for more equality been much more successful. But, ultimately, increased production in the last century was an adequate answer to the problem of absolute poverty. So why can’t we just keep going on with more of the same in this century? Why can’t the world’s poorest countries follow the example of the already industrialised? The answer is simple. There is physically not enough to go around. We have reached the limits of our planet’s resources. In a world with limitless copper, coal and iron, there is, in theory, enough for everyone. This is the world inhabited by rich-world economists and politicians who are used to scouring the planet for all their country’s need. But in the real world, there is a limited amount. What the rich countries take, the poor cannot have. Inequality, both within and between countries is on the rise. Fears about food production and erratic climate change are perhaps the two areas where the world is most dangerously off-balance. As resources run thin, more production is no longer an option to respond to persistent poverty. Redistribution has to come into play. Another thing the early economists got wrong was the fraught issue of population. Malthus believed that as wealth increased, so would population. But the opposite appears to be true. Along with access to contraception, simply becoming better off appears to have encouraged parents to have fewer children rather than more. This is good news, and it is another urgent argument for better distribution of wealth. Wealthier communities will see population decreases, which will in turn make living on our planet more sustainable. Redistribution is the hardest of political ambitions, because very few people are willing to see their children’s standard of living reduce below theirs. In the past, violent revolution has been the way to achieve serious redistribution. This time around, we need a revolution in our expectations to place equality at the heart of a new development paradigm. If it is not swift and wise, then it may be violent. It will certainly require massive and sustained political pressure. So we need to find a way of making reduced consumption aspirational. We need to convince each other that living with fewer things is good for us. We need a new development theory for a new century. There have always been many reasons to fight for equality. Ending absolute poverty is once again definitively one of them. Economics Global economy Development Population Jonathan Glennie guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
East London’s top 10 budget eats

Guardian Travel is currently compiling a thorough overview of London’s best budget eateries. In his second instalment, Tony Naylor heads out east, into Shoreditch, Hackney and beyond Part one : Central London’s top 10 budget eats See our interactive map of Britain’s best budget restaurants St John Bread & Wine, Spitalfields On the face of it, let alone in a “budget eats” feature, £5.70 seems an awful lot to pay for a bacon butty. It is one of the themes of this series, however, that – particularly when you’re eating on a tight budget – value is more important than cost. And the St John bacon butty is indisputably worth every one of those 570 pennies. It comprises two large chargrilled slices of proper artisan bread (from the on-site bakery, thickly buttered and liberally stuffed with Gloucester Old Spot bacon . The rashers have a good three-quarter-inch rim of gloriously silky translucent fat around their outer edge. In its generosity, its use of supreme ingredients, in its hilarious disregard for anything you might describe as healthy eating, it is Fergus Henderson (owner of this and the more famous parent restaurant, St John) on a plate. There are also kippers, pikelets or, if you really insist, porridge and prunes available for breakfast, but that bacon butty will set you up for the day like nothing else. From 11am, Bread & Wine – a pleasingly spartan former bank – serves elevenses, cakes and whatnot. Then, from lunch onwards the menu consists of small ‘n’ large plates (£4-£15), which people mix ‘n’ match, splashing the cash. That said, if you can squeeze in for a simple bowl of celeriac and bacon soup, do (£5.90). • Breakfast £2.60-£5.70, elevenses cakes £2.90. 94-96 Commercial Street, E1 (+44 (0)20-3301 8069, stjohnbreadandwine.com ) Beigel Bake, Brick Lane The tile work at this Brick Lane bakery has seen better days, but then you might look a bit tired yourself had you been serving fresh breads, pastries and filled bagels to hungry Londoners, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week since the late 1970s. Beigel Bake is a legendary stop-off for late-night revellers, but you will find queues of varying lengths here whatever time of day you drop by. In a place where filled bagels start at 90p, spending £3.50 on one may seem rash. But the warm salt beef bagel is worth it. Tasty, moist, gelatinous thick-cut braised brisket on a fantastic dense, chewy bagel, served with peppy mustard, it is simple but satisfying stuff. Filled bagels from 90p. 159 Brick Lane, E1 (+44 (0)20-7729 0616) The Gun, Docklands There is not a lot of individuality or joy in Canary Wharf. People are too busy making money. Escape its soaring glass and steel boulevards, however, and, a short walk away, you will find Tom and Ed Martin’s polished gastropub, the Gun. An oasis of laughter, clubbable informality and good food, it is also a fine place in which to consider the mad folly of the Millennium Dome, visible across the Thames from the pub’s waterside terrace. There is a proper restaurant section at the Gun, but the budget traveller should grab a table in the back – by the toasty open fire – and give the bar menu the once-over. There, you will find the likes of homemade fish finger sandwiches, a cheeseboard, devilled whitebait or a half a pint of prawns at under £10 a head. A sausage roll (£4.50) is a substantial slab, more lunch than a snack. A hunk of soundly sage-seasoned, smoothly ground, juicy sausage-meat in a perfectly bronzed, buttery thin pastry, it is seriously good stuff. It’s like the best Christmas Day stuffing … ever. A sample pint of Fuller’s London Pride (£3.50) is as lively as it can be, which is not very. It is a definitive boring brown bitter. • Bar menu available for lunch and dinner, from £4.50. 27 Coldharbour, E14 (+44 (0)20-7515 5222, thegundocklands.com ) Frizzante, Hackney and Rotherhithe This cafe at Hackney City Farm is a refreshingly rough ‘n’ ready, slightly ramshackle place. But for the steady stream of young mums and toddlers coming through the door, you might mistake it for some arty, hipster hang-out. Which, this being Hackney, it kind of is as well. There is a small deli section and ice-cream counter, but it is worth settling in and sampling Italian chef Eddy Ambrosi’s blackboard specials, such as pappardelle pasta with a slow-cooked pork ragu, pressed organic brawn terrine or a wild British mushroom risotto. Much of the produce comes from farms in Kent and Essex, and, depending on seasonal availability, Frizzante’s own veg patch. A portion of lightly cured salmon and scrambled eggs, topped with a particularly zingy creme fraiche and chives, is huge (£6.50). Bright swirls of orangey yolk suggest good eggs, although personally I think they could have been creamier. There is a fine line between scrambled eggs and omelette. • Food served until 4pm. Breakfast £4-£7. Daily specials from £5. Hackney City Farm, 1a Goldsmiths Row, E2 (+44 (0)20-7739 2266, frizzanteltd.co.uk ). Second branch at Surrey Docks Farm , Rotherhithe, SE16, open Wednesday to Sunday Hackney Pearl, Hackney Wick From breakfast to late-night cocktails, this trendy cafe-bar is, laudably, trying to do lots of important things well. Food-wise the emphasis is on labour-intensive, from-scratch making and baking, running the gamut from bar snacks, like the Pearl’s little pots of homemade pork scratchings (90p), to fantastic, fragrant apple, cinnamon and clove muffins (£1.80). A bowl of parsnip soup is warm, wholesome, properly seasoned and vibrantly fresh in flavour, and arrives with good bread. That day’s chalkboard menu includes appealing dishes such as lamb and caper hash with fried egg (£8.20). Breakfast includes the kitchen’s own granola, sweetcorn fritters with chilli jam, and bubble ‘n’ squeak. A sample coffee was disappointing – buying Square Mile coffee is one thing, treating it with the respect it deserves is another. Note: the evening menu is more expensive, with most main dishes topping £10. • Breakfast £3.50-£7.50, soups/sandwiches around £4.50, daytime mains £7-£9. 11 Prince Edward Road, E9 (+44 (0)20-8510 3605, thehackneypearl.com ) Tayyabs, Whitechapel An utterly predictable choice, perhaps, but there is a reason why everyone raves about Tayyabs . This Pakistani grill and curry house is very, very good. How can you not love a restaurant where, on a sunny Tuesday lunchtime, the staff have to throw open the doors in order to let out a sudden build-up of aromatic smoke from those famous tandoor ovens? Tayyabs’ long-marinated grilled lamb chops (four for £6) remain one of life’s great savoury pleasures, the meat essentially a delivery vehicle for a complex hit of sweet ‘n’ smoky, hot ‘n’ spicy flavour, edged with a crisp, blackened strip of fat. Don’t be surprised to find yourself gnawing the bone long after the meat has gone. There is no standing on ceremony at Tayyabs and eating in here can be a pretty quick turnaround experience. On busy weekend evenings particularly, you are not encouraged to linger at your table. But at these prices (curry and rice around £7-£8) this is exceptional food: conscientiously cooked, sparkily spiced and lifted by liberal use of fresh herbs. Seeing it in daylight for once, Tayyabs is quite a smart space these days, too. • Starters from 95p, mains from £5.20. No alcohol sold, BYO no corkage. 83-89 Fieldgate Street, E1 (+44 (0)20-7247 6400, tayyabs.co.uk ) Cay Tre, Hoxton Such is the cluster of Vietnamese restaurants around the Kingsland Road/Old Street junction, they probably deserve a feature in their own right. Cay Tre is a good place to start your exploration. With its fashionable black ‘n’ white wallpaper and multicoloured lighting, the space itself is very modern Shoreditch, but in terms of its accumulated knowledge and skill, the cooking harks back generations. You could spend a long time trying to discern exactly what has gone into the clear, light broth that makes Cay Tre’s pho (Vietnamese noodle soup) stand out. Packed with fresh coriander, spring onions and, in my case, beef, it is neither as salty nor as hot as you might imagine, but instead reveals new ingredients (star anise, garlic, roasted onions, cinnamon, some sort of base meaty, umami flavour) with each mouthful. It is a delicate clean soup with a nonetheless serious depth of flavour. The accompanying noodles are great, too. As a takeaway, this “small” pot of goodness is enough for a solid lunch or light dinner and costs just £3.50, which makes it all the more remarkable. Eating in at Cay Tre, the pho dishes are affordable throughout (around £7), but, at night, a main meat or fish dish plus rice might nudge £10. If you need to stick rigidly to a budget, then at lunch and before 6pm, the menu offers various “one-dish meals”, such as lemongrass-marinated barbecue pork with bun (cold vermicelli noodles) or mixed seafood with jasmine rice, at £6.50-£8. • Takeaway dishes £3-£8, starter/main deal £9.50. 301 Old Street, EC1 (+44 (0)20-7729 8662, vietnamesekitchen.co.uk ) Pavilion Cafe, Victoria Park Victoria Park is currently in the midst of major renovation work, which means this lakeside cafe is currently lacking its lake (it’s been drained) and its usually picturesque views (unless you love mud and industrial diggers). But still, on a dull Wednesday morning it is packed, such is the quality of the food. Superior, seasonal ingredients are confidently handled in everything from sandwiches to a beef shin stew with turnips, sprouts and rye bread. The Pavilion will prick the interest of vegetarians, too, with unusually thoughtful dishes like sprouting broccoli, crushed artichokes and soft boiled egg on toast, with a hazelnut dressing. A plate of eggs Benedict easily passes muster, although it has been left to linger on the pass. It is lukewarm rather than hot. It is also worth noting that the Pavilion gets very busy with mums, giddy toddlers and buggies. Anti-social singletons who want to eat at its communal tables in peace may want to take a paper (the Guardian, of course) and an iPod. • Breakfast £2.50-£8.50, sandwiches £4, hot dishes £5-£8. Takeaway available. Victoria Park, corner of Old Ford Road and Grove Road, E9 (+44 (0)20-8980 0030, the-pavilion-cafe.com ) Albion at the Boundary, Shoreditch If confirmation were needed that Shoreditch has lost its edge, the arrival of Terence Conran’s boutique hotel and restaurant, the Boundary , is surely it. Its gentrification is now almost complete. Still, on the upside, the site’s newer ground-floor deli-cafe, Albion, is a great place to eat. And we can always do with more of those. Look beyond the shelves of HP Sauce and Yorkshire Tea (we get it, the Albion is a celebration of Englishness) and you will find some good, and good value, food here. You can eat in the “caff” – a big Conranesque canteen space – for under £10 a head if you’re careful, but with so many good things to take away from the deli section, why bother? There are made-to-order sandwiches, savoury pies and tarts, biscuits and cakes, and chilled drinks of a Meantime Brewery/Fentiman’s quality. A sample pork and chutney pie in thick, glossy pastry is superb. A slice of Bakewell tart is, whilst an expert bit of baking, possibly a bit too refined for its own good. The jam is spread a little too thinly along the base and, consequently, the almond filling lacks the requisite sweet fruity tang. But still, overall, well worth a visit. • Cakes and biscuits from 55p, snacks/sandwiches £2.50-£5. 2-4 Boundary Street, E2 (+44 (0)20-7729 1051, albioncaff.co.uk ) Mangal Ocakbasi, Dalston There are no end of places on Stoke Newington Road cooking kebabs on traditional Turkish ocak grills. Opinions vary, of course, as to which ocakbasi restaurant is the best, but Mangal – a 1993 entrant in the Good Food Guide and still listed in the 2011 edition – has a proven track record of producing superlative meats over many years. The restaurant proper is a little expensive for this piece (main dishes from £9), but, out front, takeaway customers can choose from 13 types of kebab (marinated lamb, chicken wings, lamb chops, quail, etc), which the grill chef then moves up and down a great trough of hot charcoal with patient authority. It is worth getting a takeaway just to watch him at work. Boldly seasoned with chilli, garlic and parsley, the minced lamb beyti kebabs are sensational, an explosive combination of heat, carbon and hot lamb juices. Moreover, you get two eight-inch kebabs, a small, discus-like loaf and a great mixed salad (it includes everything from gherkins to pickled radish) for £6. It could easily be split between two for lunch. • Takeaway kebabs from £5.10. Arcola Street, off Stoke Newington Road, E8 (+44 (0)20-7275 8981, mangal1.com ) Tony travelled from Manchester to London with Virgin Trains London Restaurants Budget travel Top 10s Food and drink Food & drink Restaurants United Kingdom Tony Naylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …