• ‘It was time for John Terry to return,’ says Fabio Capello • Irritated Capello admits Ferdinand turned down meeting Fabio Capello has defended his decision to take the England captaincy off Rio Ferdinand and replace him with John Terry, but admits he has regret at how the situation was handled. Terry’s return as captain following a 13-month exile after allegations about his private life has dominated the headlines in the buildup to Saturday’s game with Wales, while it has been reported that Capello did not tell Ferdinand that he was being replaced as captain before the story emerged in the media. “Look it could have been done something better but it is the past,” Capello said. “I respect the players, I respect all the people and sometime I regret what really happened, but it’s possible to do something better.” Ferdinand’s absence through injury, plus that of the vice-captain Steven Gerrard, meant that Capello had a captaincy decision to make, and he believes he has made the right choice. “Something happened in my mind when I saw the armband being passed around during our game in Copenhagen [against Denmark],” he said. “We changed it in the second half and it was unfair for John Terry to see this. I thought that it was time for John Terry, after punishment, to return and be captain. “I know that Rio Ferdinand and Steven Gerrard are not fit. I knew it was the moment, with one game which is so important, to have one captain like John Terry.” Capello said he attempted to discuss the situation with Ferdinand when he attended Manchester United’s Champions League match against Marseille on 15 March but the defender rejected to chance to meet the England manager. “I tried to meet him [Ferdinand] when Manchester United played against Marseille but he told me no. I can understand everything, but I need to make decisions. I think I will be happy and will meet him [Ferdinand] in the future.” When pressed as to whether or not he had spoken to Ferdinand at any stage a visible irritated Capello responded defensively. “It didn’t happen, he didn’t come. It’s a question for him, not for me. I was in the directors’ box. You have to ask him, OK?” Capello said he consulted several players before reinstating Terry as captain. “I spoke with the players and personally with some players, and I spoke with the squad before I decided that John Terry will be the captain, and all the players were happy because John Terry was always a very important leader on the pitch and to the team.” Fabio Capello England John Terry Rio Ferdinand guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Apple remains ahead of the pack with the iPad 2, which offers faster web browsing, better graphics – and a really clever cover Apple chief Steve Jobs made a point of knocking rivals’ “copycat” tablet computers at the iPad 2 launch earlier this month. Samsung, RIM and Motorola “aren’t even catching up with the first iPad”, he said. Apple didn’t need to launch a second-generation iPad. The original commands around 80% of the US tablet market. It is less than a year out of the box. But when Jobs can improve on one of Apple’s products, you can rest assured that he will. Thinner, lighter and faster than its predecessor, the iPad 2 has a smaller footprint than the original – plus two cameras and extra software such as GarageBand. At 241mm tall, 186mm wide and 8.6mm thick, Apple’s iPad 2 is the sleekest tablet computer on the market. Its minimalist outer shell is complemented by a new “smart cover” that removes all the smears that come with thumbing and prodding the screen. Unlike its older brother, the iPad 2 has rounded edges, meaning it can be held more comfortably for longer. And at 100g lighter, it is noticeably more comfortable to hold than its predecessor, which could become uncomfortable if held in the same position for more than 10 minutes. The greatest departure from the original iPad is its speed. Apple claims that loading apps, playing games and browsing the internet are up to up to twice as fast as on the original. Certainly, internet browsing is the most striking difference. Fixtures on the average internet page tend to load all at once – Flash excepted, of course – and sometimes five or six seconds ahead of the original iPad. As an owner of the original iPad, I’ve never felt that performance was lagging (then again, I also own a 20-month-old iPhone 3G), but the iPad 2′s A5 dual core processor makes it much more responsive to touch. The graphics upgrade is really only noticeable when playing £5.99 shoot-em-up games or streaming long-form programming such as the iPlayer. For most people, I suspect the greatest immediate draw to the iPad 2 will be the cameras. Apple was slammed when it didn’t include them in its first edition and later claimed it to be users’ most-wanted function. Sadly, the cameras on this device are left wanting. Leaving aside the question of whether people really want to wave a 10inch x 7inch computer around in public, the VGA-quality front and rear-facing cameras – for video and stills – are pixel-poor and not flattered by the iPad’s high-quality screen. The rear-facing camera is put to best use with FaceTime, Apple’s video-calling function. Which leads us to software. The iPad 2 includes a string of media apps which first-generation owners won’t ever get a look at. Apple’s popular music-making software GarageBand (which iPad 1 users can get if they upgrade to iOS 4.3) is great fun and a boon for those with rambunctious young kids knocking about the house. Warning: it doesn’t come with headphones so don’t turn the volume up too loud. Apple’s movie-making app, iMovie, also finds a new home on the iPad 2. Precision editing was never one of the iPad’s strong points – writers bemoan spending hours hovering over misspelt words before the cursor would respond to the change – so the iPad seems an unnatural home for iMovie. Frankly, uploading to the web or to a synced Mac is so painless that iMovie could happily gather dust for most users. (A new hall-of-mirrors-style app called Photo Booth is so pointless it wastes good real estate – it can’t be deleted.) Despite the faster processor and enhanced graphics, the iPad 2′s battery life is on a par with the original; long-life performance is one of the device’s strongest selling points. My one qualm has to be the amount of time it takes for the iPad to charge – inordinately long compared with drain time. Apple’s attention to detail shines through with the new “Smart Cover”. At the iPad 2 launch, Jobs spent so much time demonstrating this magically magnetic clip-on sheath that I thought it would inevitably be a flop. In fact, the Smart Cover promises to shut out all the third-party manufacturers that churned out dog-eared cases for the iPad 1. Overall, the iPad 2 offers a string of incremental but important improvements on its predecessor. It remains a stretch ahead of the pack – though not quite “lapping the competition”, as Apple would like to make out – and it is hard to find any serious shortcomings with the second-generation tablet. However owners of the original iPad should not feel too sore about the upgrade: you don’t need to buy a new tablet. Those waiting to buy their first tablet could do much worse than the iPad 2. iPad Tablet computers Apple Computing Digital media Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Apple remains ahead of the pack with the iPad 2, which offers faster web browsing, better graphics – and a really clever cover Apple chief Steve Jobs made a point of knocking rivals’ “copycat” tablet computers at the iPad 2 launch earlier this month. Samsung, RIM and Motorola “aren’t even catching up with the first iPad”, he said. Apple didn’t need to launch a second-generation iPad. The original commands around 80% of the US tablet market. It is less than a year out of the box. But when Jobs can improve on one of Apple’s products, you can rest assured that he will. Thinner, lighter and faster than its predecessor, the iPad 2 has a smaller footprint than the original – plus two cameras and extra software such as GarageBand. At 241mm tall, 186mm wide and 8.6mm thick, Apple’s iPad 2 is the sleekest tablet computer on the market. Its minimalist outer shell is complemented by a new “smart cover” that removes all the smears that come with thumbing and prodding the screen. Unlike its older brother, the iPad 2 has rounded edges, meaning it can be held more comfortably for longer. And at 100g lighter, it is noticeably more comfortable to hold than its predecessor, which could become uncomfortable if held in the same position for more than 10 minutes. The greatest departure from the original iPad is its speed. Apple claims that loading apps, playing games and browsing the internet are up to up to twice as fast as on the original. Certainly, internet browsing is the most striking difference. Fixtures on the average internet page tend to load all at once – Flash excepted, of course – and sometimes five or six seconds ahead of the original iPad. As an owner of the original iPad, I’ve never felt that performance was lagging (then again, I also own a 20-month-old iPhone 3G), but the iPad 2′s A5 dual core processor makes it much more responsive to touch. The graphics upgrade is really only noticeable when playing £5.99 shoot-em-up games or streaming long-form programming such as the iPlayer. For most people, I suspect the greatest immediate draw to the iPad 2 will be the cameras. Apple was slammed when it didn’t include them in its first edition and later claimed it to be users’ most-wanted function. Sadly, the cameras on this device are left wanting. Leaving aside the question of whether people really want to wave a 10inch x 7inch computer around in public, the VGA-quality front and rear-facing cameras – for video and stills – are pixel-poor and not flattered by the iPad’s high-quality screen. The rear-facing camera is put to best use with FaceTime, Apple’s video-calling function. Which leads us to software. The iPad 2 includes a string of media apps which first-generation owners won’t ever get a look at. Apple’s popular music-making software GarageBand (which iPad 1 users can get if they upgrade to iOS 4.3) is great fun and a boon for those with rambunctious young kids knocking about the house. Warning: it doesn’t come with headphones so don’t turn the volume up too loud. Apple’s movie-making app, iMovie, also finds a new home on the iPad 2. Precision editing was never one of the iPad’s strong points – writers bemoan spending hours hovering over misspelt words before the cursor would respond to the change – so the iPad seems an unnatural home for iMovie. Frankly, uploading to the web or to a synced Mac is so painless that iMovie could happily gather dust for most users. (A new hall-of-mirrors-style app called Photo Booth is so pointless it wastes good real estate – it can’t be deleted.) Despite the faster processor and enhanced graphics, the iPad 2′s battery life is on a par with the original; long-life performance is one of the device’s strongest selling points. My one qualm has to be the amount of time it takes for the iPad to charge – inordinately long compared with drain time. Apple’s attention to detail shines through with the new “Smart Cover”. At the iPad 2 launch, Jobs spent so much time demonstrating this magically magnetic clip-on sheath that I thought it would inevitably be a flop. In fact, the Smart Cover promises to shut out all the third-party manufacturers that churned out dog-eared cases for the iPad 1. Overall, the iPad 2 offers a string of incremental but important improvements on its predecessor. It remains a stretch ahead of the pack – though not quite “lapping the competition”, as Apple would like to make out – and it is hard to find any serious shortcomings with the second-generation tablet. However owners of the original iPad should not feel too sore about the upgrade: you don’t need to buy a new tablet. Those waiting to buy their first tablet could do much worse than the iPad 2. iPad Tablet computers Apple Computing Digital media Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Labour leader says coalition policies driving wedge between rich and the poor, public and private sectors and north and south The government is putting Britain on a path back to the 1980s by adopting the “politics of division”, the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, has said. Speaking ahead of tomorrow’s anti-cuts march in London – expected to be the biggest national demonstration since the 2003 march against the Iraq war – Miliband said the coalition’s policies were driving a wedge between the rich and the poor, the public and private sectors and the north and the south. He described the London demonstration as the “march of the mainstream”, arguing that the cuts were uniting everyone from the small businessman to the public sector workers to families affected by the government’s policies . “I grew up in the 1980s. Now, I thought some of the music of the 1980s was quite good. But I thought the politics of the 1980s were rotten,” he said in Nottingham. “I thought they were rotten because they divided our country, and I fear we are seeing our country divided again. I fear that this government is practising the politics of division. “They’re saying to the bankers, well you can have a tax cut this year and you can carry on getting your bonuses – but they’re saying to everybody else, you’re going to have to pay the price of the economic crisis that the bankers caused. “They’re saying people in the public sector and people in the private sector should somehow be at odds. They’re saying people on benefits should be resented by those in work. They’re saying we should set north against south. That is the politics of division, and we can’t go back to that.” Miliband will address a rally in Hyde Park at the end of the three-mile march from Embankment tomorrow in what will be one of his most high-profile speeches to date. The TUC organisers said they were preparing for as many as 200,000 people to join the march. The TUC has worked closely with police to try and ensure the event goes smoothly, but police say they were expecting a “small but significant” minority of people who could cause trouble . Greg Hands, the Conservative MP for Chealsea and Fulham, said: “This march is being organised by the TUC with Ed Miliband as the star speaker. “Having decided to bring thousands of their supporters onto the streets, [they] have a duty to ensure that their march does not become a focus for disorder and law-breaking. “Ed Miliband should use his influence with the unions to ensure that the march … is not taken over by extremist groups. There must be no repeat of the violence we witnessed at several student marches last year.” Nigel Stanley, the TUC head of campaigns, said: “Tomorrow will see thousands of good-natured protesters gathering to say no to deep, rapid and unfair spending cuts. “Months of planning, close working with the police and well over a thousand trained stewards will ensure that this is family-friendly event – a powerful voice, but peacefully expressed.” Ed Miliband Labour Liberal-Conservative coalition Economic policy Trade unions guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Number of bombs and missiles fired by British military small compared to US and France • Libya and Middle East unrest – LIVE coverage Britain is playing a prominent political and diplomatic role over Libya but a remarkably modest one in the military campaign, an initial analysis of available information of the first week’s action suggests. The Ministry of Defence, in marked contrast to the Pentagon and the French armed forces, declines to say how many bombs or missiles have been fired from RAF Tornados or how many Tomahawk cruise missiles have been fired from HMS Triumph (a Trafalgar-class submarine which the MoD declined to identify until David Cameron named her in the Commons). However, defence sources say a total of seven Tomahawk cruise missiles have been fired from Triumph, compared to at least 168 fired from US submarines and ships. Liam Fox, the defence secretary, said Tornado aircraft on Thursday launched “a number of guided Brimstone missiles at Libyan armoured vehicles which were threatening the civilian population of Ajdabiya”. He described Brimstone as a “high-precision, low collateral damage weapon optimised against demanding and mobile targets”. This was the first time the Tornados – whose home base is RAF Marham in Norfolk but which now fly from the southern Italian base of Gioia del Colle – had fired weapons at Libyan targets since Saturday, the first night of the campaign. Four Tornados were involved, probably firing no more than two bombs or Storm Shadow missiles each. The following night, the Tornados’ bombing run was aborted because a number of civilians, later identified as including western journalists, were found to be in the “intended target area”, the MoD has said. It is possible that no more than about eight bombs or missiles had been fired from RAF Tornados before the Brimstone attacks on Thursday night. That contrasts with hundreds of attacks by US and French aircraft, with, in one reported incident, US planes firing 40 missiles at one Libyan air base. William Hague, the foreign secretary, said on Thursday that the RAF had flown 59 missions over Libya. The large majority have been reconnaissance missions. They have also included what the MoD emphasises were the first Eurofighter/Typhoon aircraft deployed in what it described as “hostile airspace”. The 10 Typhoons are only suitable for air-to-air combat, according to the MoD. The ground attack version apparently is not ready to take over the Tornados’ role – though defence sources point out that the high profile the Tornados are enjoying will make it much harder for the government to scrap them as soon as it would otherwise like to. The RAF is responsible for policing the “no-fly zone” over eastern Libya, the rebel stronghold. Actively engaged in Afghanistan, it does not have any more aircraft available to take part in the Libyan operations. Libya Military Middle East US military France Liam Fox United States Europe Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Crossposted with permission from Tula Connell of AFL-CIO Now Blog enlarge Credit: AFL-CIO Now Blog When word got out two weeks ago that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker had ordered the windows of the state Capitol building bolted shut during the ongoing protests against his attacks on public employees, it was a chilling reminder of a similar action by the employers of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory. Nearly 100 years ago to the day of Walker’s order—which he rescinded after public outrage—146 workers, mostly young immigrant girls, jumped to their deaths from the 10-story building, unable to escape a fire because factory foremen had locked all the doors. The owners, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, worried the workers would steal from the company. Hyman Meshel worked on the eighth floor. When the rescue crew found Meshel, who was still alive, the flesh of the palms of his hands had been torn from the bones by his sliding down the steel cable in the elevator, and his knuckles and forearms were full of glass splinters from beating his way through the glass door of the elevator shaft. Thirty dead bodies clogged the elevator shaft. All were young girls. Among the many victims, the New York Times reported the day after the disaster, were two girls: charred beyond all hope of recognition, and found in the smoking ruins with their arms clasped around each other’s necks…. Three weeks before the Triangle conflagration, the Protective League of Property Owners had held a meeting, indignant over orders by Fire Commissioner Rhinelander Waldo to install sprinklers in warehouses. Owners claimed the order amounted to a “ confiscation of property .” The League wasn’t the only employer group to put profit over safety. As the New York Times reported, Fire Chief Edward Croker: spoke bitterly of the way in which the Manufacturers’ Association had called a meeting in Wall Street to take measures against his proposal for enforcing better methods of protection for employees in case of fire. His department had cited the Triangle building for lack of fire escapes just one week before the fire. The working conditions at Triangle and other apparel factories had spurred tens of thousands of shirtwaist workers from more than 500 factories to walk off their jobs in November 1909. Led by the International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union (ILGWU), they demanded a 20 percent pay raise, a 52-hour workweek and extra pay for overtime. They also called for adequate fire escapes and open doors from the factories to the street. By February 1910, most of the small and midsized factories, and some of the larger employers, had negotiated a settlement for higher pay and shorter hours. One of the companies that refused to settle was the Triangle Waist Company, one of New York’s largest garment makers. The Triangle fire resulted in enactment of stricter job safety and health regulations in New York and across the country. The ordeal of the victims, who are remembered here by Cornell University, has inspired countless memorials, tributes and documentaries, beginning April 30, 1911, when 50,000 New Yorkers marched behind empty hearses to memorialize those killed in the fire. But as we commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire on March 25, it’s sobering to realize many of the lessons we thought had been absorbed must be re-learned again. And again. The Triangle fire, a symbol of unfettered Gilded Age greed, still stands burning before us—from lack of job safety and health protections, to neglect of the conditions endured by immigrant workers to the fundamental ability of workers to form unions and bargain for a better life. The following three perspectives highlight how the issues behind the Triangle fire still have not been resolved. America’s Immigrant Workers When most of us think how the immigrant workers were treated at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory, we are convinced such environments no longer exist in this country. Not so, says Ai-jen Poo. As the founder of Domestic Workers United based in New York, Poo has helped lead a movement of some the nation’s most invisible workers, those not covered by standard U.S. labor laws and hidden from view in countless homes. Last year, through the efforts of Domestic Workers United, the New York State Legislature enacted a precedent-setting law covering the wages, severance pay and sick days of the state’s estimated 200,000 nannies and housekeepers. The Domestic Workers Bill of Rights is a model for domestic workers who, despite the odds, are joining together and demanding their basic human rights on the job. Immigrant workers face attacks by hostile state legislatures Some of the industries today where many immigrant workers are on the job are unregulated and have fallen outside the protection of existing labor laws, including the right to organize, says Poo. But while these industries were once considered marginal, [t]hey are increasingly defining the entire direction of this economy, where workers, whether immigrant or not, are experiencing dangerous working conditions, long working hours and low wages. This “shadow” economy, with its long hours, low wages and dangerous conditions in which people are overworked and yet still poor, is “more the norm,” says Poo—and worse: It’s a good window into the economic health of this country which is not very healthy. Just as at the turn of the century you could look at the manufacturing industry and see the economy wasn’t healthy. But after Triangle and after countless more outrages, known and unknown, at the workplace, workers took their futures in their hands and reshaped the economy. We’re now in a very similar moment. We’re standing at the precipice of a major crisis for working people in their country, another moment where we have to stand up as immigrant workers and all workers to take back our rights and dignity in the workplace and in the economy as a whole. As Poo says, the actions of immigrant workers to organize against all odds in these workplaces can offer an example for us all as we search for ways to regroup and move forward. Job Safety and Health Last April, 99 years after the Triangle disaster, 29 miners were killed at West Virginia’s Upper Big Branch mine in an explosion that the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) says could have been prevented if the mine had been in compliance with federal mine safety rules. Massey Energy, the mine’s owner, had a significant history of safety violations . The coal industry isn’t the only one where U.S. workers die at work. In 2008, 5,214 workers were killed on the job , another 50,000 workers died from occupational diseases, and at least 4.6 million workers were reported injured. The disasters last year that killed those miners could have been avoided had lawmakers resisted lobbying by mine owners, says Peter Dreier. Dreier, who teaches politics and chairs the Urban and Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College, says that today , the the leading foe of reform is the United States Chamber of Commerce, which is on a crusade against the Obama administration’s plans to set new rules on unsafe workplaces, industrial hazards and threats to public health. The Chamber’s most vocal proponent is Darrell Issa, the conservative California Republican who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. At the request of the Chamber and other industry lobbies, Issa recently launched a congressional assault on safeguards in workplaces and communities. The American Petroleum Institute, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Association of American Railroads, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, and lobbies representing health care, banking, and telecommunication providers are lobbying to scale back the gamut of job safety and health laws that protect millions of workers. And Republicans are doing their bidding. In a piece on Triangle , Dreier and Donald Cohen, director of the Cry Wolf Project that counters attempts to discredit progressive policies, write that Republicans in Congress are proposing to cut OSHA’s budget by 20 percent, which, coming on top of decades of cuts, would cripple an agency that has been effective at significantly reducing workplace injuries and deaths. A century after the Triangle fire, “we still hear much of the same rhetoric whenever reformers seek to use government” to get businesses act more responsibly and protect consumers, workers and the environment. The Republican leadership is trying to drive home the message, in Speaker John Boehner’s words, that “excessive regulation costs jobs” and that the “path to prosperity” is by “getting government out of the way.” Americans of earlier generations—who enjoyed the benefits of the Progressive Era and the New Deal reforms, and the political clout of a vibrant labor movement—understood this was nonsense, but it seems like the lessons of the past have to be relearned again. Freedom to Form Unions enlarge When newly-elected Republican Gov. Scott Walker proposed taking collective bargaining rights away from Wisconsin public employees early this year, Chad Goldberg joined tens of thousands—sometimes hundreds of thousands—of state residents to protest the move. He and others spent the night at the Capitol to ensure the governor didn’t shut them out, in addition to taking part in rallies during the state’s bitter winter. The Wisconsin uprising has lasted for more than five weeks, sparking solidarity rallies across the country and generating support from as far away as Egypt and Australia. Goldberg, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, notes the bitter irony that on the 100th anniversary of the Triangle fire, Walker is turning the clock back in Wisconsin, refusing to work with unions or allow public employees to bargain over working conditions. “The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire showed what can happen when employers refuse to work with unions,” says Goldberg, vice president of United Faculty & Academic Staff (UFAS), AFT Local 223. If the factory owners had negotiated with the garment workers’ union, which demanded a decent fire escape and better safety conditions, 146 lives would have been saved. The Republican-controlled legislature approved Walker’s proposal to gut collective bargaining, saying the action would help the state’s budget. But Goldberg and others know the move was political —taking away the freedom of workers to bargain has nothing to do with balancing the budget. In state after state, similar attacks on the rights of workers to bargain for good middle class jobs are aimed at gutting the strength of workers and stacking the deck in favor of CEOs and Wall Street. Collective bargaining rights are a matter of basic fairness, says Goldberg. Collective bargaining “strengthens shared governance, needed checks and balances and accountability and improves working conditions.” Our working conditions are students’ learning conditions and when you improve one, you improve the other. The Triangle fire “also showed how arrogance and oppression can galvanize the public to demand better treatment for workers,” he says. “The governor’s arrogance, the arrogance of the public legislators, the way they’re overreaching and the extremist nature of their agenda is really fueling a public reaction in defense of workers’ rights and public services. The Triangle fire led to the growth of the garment workers’ union and the strengthening of fire, health, and labor regulations. Today in Wisconsin, we’re seeing the same kind of public mobilization to defend workers’ rights and the public services on which working families depend. Resources Columbia University’s Remembering the Triangle Factory Fire site offers details of the events, the reforms it sparked and educational resources for teachers. The U.S. Department of Labor offers a mobile-optimized website to commemorate the anniversary, featuring an audio tour and background of the event. When you travel to one of the locations for the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire you can listen to an audio description of the location by clicking on the link within the page. Remember the Triangle Fire Coalition offers a range of events commemorating the 100th anniversary.
Continue reading …Nazareth in Colombia says travellers don’t spend much and show little respect to indigenous people The small Amazonian town of Nazareth is a traveller’s dream. Wildlife prowls the surrounding jungles and the indigenous inhabitants practise ceremonies that long predate the arrival of the Spanish conquistadores. But it may be advisable for tourists to give the place a wide berth. Villagers here have declared their town off limits to travellers, even though this stretch of the Amazon river is playing host to more visitors than ever. Their main complaint: tourists’ behaviour, and that only a fraction of the money they spend trickles down to the indigenous. “What we earn here is very little. Tourists come here, they buy a few things, a few artisan goods, and they go. It is the travel agencies that make the good money,” said Juvencio Pereira, an Indigenous Guard, Nazareth’s unofficial volunteer police force. The town of 800 people, a 20-minute boat ride from the tourist hub of Leticia, takes its ban seriously. At the entrance, Pereira and other guards stand armed with their traditional sticks ready to deter unwelcome visitors. Nazareth resident Grimaldo Ramos feels that some tourists can’t distinguish between the wildlife and the Amazon’s residents, snapping photos of indigenous families as if they were another animal. “Tourists come and shove a camera in our faces,” he said. “Imagine if you were sitting in your home and strangers came in and started taking photos of you. You wouldn’t like it.” Nazareth’s actions reveal a split among the indigenous communities that live along the river about what role tourism should play in the region’s development. With the rise of eco-tourism, this part of the Amazon, which joins Colombia, Peru and Brazil, has seen a flood of travellers arriving to experience the world’s most biologically diverse region. Tourists swim with the Amazon’s pink dolphins, fish for piranhas, hike through the rainforests and take in the sunsets over the mighty river. According to the tourism office for the Colombian province of Amazonas, the 35,000 people who trekked to the region in 2010 represent a fivefold surge in numbers over the past eight years. But as Nazareth complains, the indigenous people have so far seen little of the benefits, mostly just the sharp end of tourism. A common concern among indigenous leaders is that local children are adopting the outsiders’ ways. A stroll through the riverbank towns of Macedonia, Puerto Narino and even Nazareth itself shows many children are more comfortable in “western” dress and listening to the imported music of reggaeton and Colombia’s vallenato. And then there are the inevitable misunderstandings of two cultures interacting. What a tourist may consider polite curiosity about indigenous culture can seem to some here intrusive and even an attempt to gain sacred tribal wisdom. “We don’t like it when they ask members of the community about our traditional knowledge and the medicines we possess,” said Pereira. Other communities, however, take the view that the number of visitors to the region is only going to rise, so they might as well profit from it. A couple of hours downriver lies Puerto Narino. It hosts a steady flow of visitors, but all must use the travel agencies based in the town. Puerto Narino’s mayor, Nelson Ruiz, understands Nazareth’s worries, but says that if tourism is well regulated it can help lift these communities out of the poverty that troubles much of this zone. “Other communities fear tourism can damage culture, damage our water resources with trash, destroy the environment, we don’t want that,” he says, adding visitors are expected to abide by certain rules, such as no drug-taking and no sexual tourism. For the residents back in Nazareth though, the loss of tourist revenue is a trade-off worth making. “We feel good here without tourists, there are no little annoyances,” said Ramos. Indigenous peoples Amazon Biodiversity South America Colombia Colombia Toby Muse guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nazareth in Colombia says travellers don’t spend much and show little respect to indigenous people The small Amazonian town of Nazareth is a traveller’s dream. Wildlife prowls the surrounding jungles and the indigenous inhabitants practise ceremonies that long predate the arrival of the Spanish conquistadores. But it may be advisable for tourists to give the place a wide berth. Villagers here have declared their town off limits to travellers, even though this stretch of the Amazon river is playing host to more visitors than ever. Their main complaint: tourists’ behaviour, and that only a fraction of the money they spend trickles down to the indigenous. “What we earn here is very little. Tourists come here, they buy a few things, a few artisan goods, and they go. It is the travel agencies that make the good money,” said Juvencio Pereira, an Indigenous Guard, Nazareth’s unofficial volunteer police force. The town of 800 people, a 20-minute boat ride from the tourist hub of Leticia, takes its ban seriously. At the entrance, Pereira and other guards stand armed with their traditional sticks ready to deter unwelcome visitors. Nazareth resident Grimaldo Ramos feels that some tourists can’t distinguish between the wildlife and the Amazon’s residents, snapping photos of indigenous families as if they were another animal. “Tourists come and shove a camera in our faces,” he said. “Imagine if you were sitting in your home and strangers came in and started taking photos of you. You wouldn’t like it.” Nazareth’s actions reveal a split among the indigenous communities that live along the river about what role tourism should play in the region’s development. With the rise of eco-tourism, this part of the Amazon, which joins Colombia, Peru and Brazil, has seen a flood of travellers arriving to experience the world’s most biologically diverse region. Tourists swim with the Amazon’s pink dolphins, fish for piranhas, hike through the rainforests and take in the sunsets over the mighty river. According to the tourism office for the Colombian province of Amazonas, the 35,000 people who trekked to the region in 2010 represent a fivefold surge in numbers over the past eight years. But as Nazareth complains, the indigenous people have so far seen little of the benefits, mostly just the sharp end of tourism. A common concern among indigenous leaders is that local children are adopting the outsiders’ ways. A stroll through the riverbank towns of Macedonia, Puerto Narino and even Nazareth itself shows many children are more comfortable in “western” dress and listening to the imported music of reggaeton and Colombia’s vallenato. And then there are the inevitable misunderstandings of two cultures interacting. What a tourist may consider polite curiosity about indigenous culture can seem to some here intrusive and even an attempt to gain sacred tribal wisdom. “We don’t like it when they ask members of the community about our traditional knowledge and the medicines we possess,” said Pereira. Other communities, however, take the view that the number of visitors to the region is only going to rise, so they might as well profit from it. A couple of hours downriver lies Puerto Narino. It hosts a steady flow of visitors, but all must use the travel agencies based in the town. Puerto Narino’s mayor, Nelson Ruiz, understands Nazareth’s worries, but says that if tourism is well regulated it can help lift these communities out of the poverty that troubles much of this zone. “Other communities fear tourism can damage culture, damage our water resources with trash, destroy the environment, we don’t want that,” he says, adding visitors are expected to abide by certain rules, such as no drug-taking and no sexual tourism. For the residents back in Nazareth though, the loss of tourist revenue is a trade-off worth making. “We feel good here without tourists, there are no little annoyances,” said Ramos. Indigenous peoples Amazon Biodiversity South America Colombia Colombia Toby Muse guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media America has gone crazy! Well, Arizona certainly leads the way to bizzaro land with the actions of Sheriff Joe Arpaio . And is there such a thing as Action Star Steven Seagal anymore? Sheriff Joe Arpaio rolled out the tanks to take down a man suspected of cockfighting. West Valley residents in the neighborhood are crying foul after armored vehicles, including a tank, rolled into their neighborhood to make the bust. Neighbor Debra Ross was so worried she called 911 and went outside where a nearby home had its windows blown out, was crawling with dozens of SWAT members in full gear, armored vehicles and a bomb robot .“When the tank came in and pushed the wall over and you see what’s in there, and all it is, is a bunch of chickens,” Ross said. In a massive show of force on Monday, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office executed a search warrant and arrested the homeowner, Jesus Llovera, on charges of suspected cockfighting. Llovera was alone in the house at the time of the arrest, and he was unarmed.“I think taxpayers should be shocked,” said Robert Campus, Llovera’s attorney. Campus said he believes the operation costs tens of thousands of dollars. Deputies had no probable cause to believe Llovera was armed or dangerous, according to Campus. Campus said he believes the entire scene was basically a stage, to help actor Steven Seagal’s TV show, “Lawman.” Seagal was riding in the tank . The Sheriff’s Department has entered into a contract with Seagal and part of that contract gives Seagal carte blanche to go along with the sheriff as he arrests people. Thousands of dollars in damages were made to the property and 115 birds were euthanized on the spot.Llovera was convicted of a misdemeanor last year of attending a cockfight and has no history of owning weapons. Yet the sheriff’s office said they had reasons to believe Llovera might be armed. “We’re going to err on the side of caution. We’re going to make sure that we have the appropriate amount of force in case we do run into anything like that,” said Sgt. Jesse Spurgin. We noticed that Seagal had been recruited along with Lou Ferrigno into Arpaio’s “posse” of brown-people-rounder-uppers back when it happened. Gee, who could have foreseen it would turn out to be a gigantic publicity stunt at taxpayer expense?
Continue reading …Click here to view this media America has gone crazy! Well, Arizona certainly leads the way to bizzaro land with the actions of Sheriff Joe Arpaio . And is there such a thing as Action Star Steven Seagal anymore? Sheriff Joe Arpaio rolled out the tanks to take down a man suspected of cockfighting. West Valley residents in the neighborhood are crying foul after armored vehicles, including a tank, rolled into their neighborhood to make the bust. Neighbor Debra Ross was so worried she called 911 and went outside where a nearby home had its windows blown out, was crawling with dozens of SWAT members in full gear, armored vehicles and a bomb robot .“When the tank came in and pushed the wall over and you see what’s in there, and all it is, is a bunch of chickens,” Ross said. In a massive show of force on Monday, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office executed a search warrant and arrested the homeowner, Jesus Llovera, on charges of suspected cockfighting. Llovera was alone in the house at the time of the arrest, and he was unarmed.“I think taxpayers should be shocked,” said Robert Campus, Llovera’s attorney. Campus said he believes the operation costs tens of thousands of dollars. Deputies had no probable cause to believe Llovera was armed or dangerous, according to Campus. Campus said he believes the entire scene was basically a stage, to help actor Steven Seagal’s TV show, “Lawman.” Seagal was riding in the tank . The Sheriff’s Department has entered into a contract with Seagal and part of that contract gives Seagal carte blanche to go along with the sheriff as he arrests people. Thousands of dollars in damages were made to the property and 115 birds were euthanized on the spot.Llovera was convicted of a misdemeanor last year of attending a cockfight and has no history of owning weapons. Yet the sheriff’s office said they had reasons to believe Llovera might be armed. “We’re going to err on the side of caution. We’re going to make sure that we have the appropriate amount of force in case we do run into anything like that,” said Sgt. Jesse Spurgin. We noticed that Seagal had been recruited along with Lou Ferrigno into Arpaio’s “posse” of brown-people-rounder-uppers back when it happened. Gee, who could have foreseen it would turn out to be a gigantic publicity stunt at taxpayer expense?
Continue reading …