Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1542)
US and China use death penalty most

Many countries still executing people for crimes and hundreds remain on death row, Amnesty International report reveals China, Iran, North Korea, Yemen and the US carried out the most executions last year, bucking a global trends towards abolition of the death penalty, a report has said . China again was by far the world’s most prolific executioner in putting to death thousands, said Amnesty International in its report on the death penalty worldwide. Amnesty does not provide a precise figure of executions in China as Beijing keeps such figures secret. Instead, it has challenged the Chinese authorities to publish figures for the number of people sentenced to death and executed each year to confirm claims of a reduction in the use of the death penalty. China, however, last year did move to cut down the number of offences that carry the death penalty, which applies to no less than 68 crimes. If the changes go through, the death penalty would be removed for such crimes as tax fraud, and for smuggling valuables and cultural relics. Amendments to the criminal code may also remove it as a punishment for those over 75. In all, the changes would affect 13 death penalty offences. Setting China aside, Amnesty said at least 527 executions were carried out last year. Almost half of those took place in Iran (252). North Korea executed 60, Yemen 53 and the US 46. The minimum number of executions was down from at least 714 in 2009. Methods of execution included beheading, electrocution, hanging, lethal injection and various kinds of shooting (by firing squad, and at close range to the heart or the head). No stonings were recorded in 2010, but stoning sentences were reported in Nigeria, Pakistan and Iran, where at least 10 women and four men remain under stoning sentences . At least 2,024 new death sentences were imposed during 2010 in 67 countries, including 365 in Pakistan alone, meaning it has some 8,000 people currently on death row. Amnesty expressed particular alarm that a significant proportion of executions or death sentences recorded in 2010 were for drug-related offences. They accounted for more than half of 114 sentences in Malaysia. Meanwhile, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates ignored international prohibitions and imposed death sentences on child offenders -people aged 17 or less when alleged crimes were committed, with Iran executing one such offender named as Mohammad A. The underlying trend on the death penalty, however, is strongly toward abolition, Amnesty said, with 31 countries removing the punishment in law or in practice in the last 10 years. Last year, Gabon became the 139th country to either abolish the penalty outright or to cease to use it in practice. “In spite of some setbacks, developments in 2010 brought us closer to global abolition,” said Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s secretary general. “The President of Mongolia announced a moratorium on the death penalty, an important first step as capital punishment is still classified as state secret. For the third time and with more support than ever before, the UN general assembly called for a global moratorium on executions. Any country that continues to execute is flying in the face of the fact that both human rights law and UN human rights bodies consistently hold that abolition should be the objective.” Capital punishment Amnesty International Human rights United States China Yemen North Korea Iran Mark Tran guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Secretary Clinton: Libya Is ‘Internationally Authorized Intervention’ and ‘Humanitarian Mission’

So the cover story for bombing Libya without congressional approval? According to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who appeared with Defense Secretary Robert Gates on This Week, it’s an “internationally authorized intervention where we are one of a number of countries participating to enforce a humanitarian mission” and wasn’t anything like going to war in Iraq. (So far.) I’ll give Jake Tapper props for actually asking, but I would have probed that position a little more thoroughly. JAKE TAPPER, ABC NEWS: And joining me now in their first interview since the attacks on Libya began, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Madam and Mr. Secretary, thanks so much for joining us. I’ll start with you, Secretary Gates. The mission is a no-fly zone and civilian protection but does not include removing Gadhafi from power, even though regimen change is stated U.S. policy. So why not have, as part of the mission, regime change, removing Gadhafi from power? ROBERT GATES, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: Well, first of all, I think you don’t want ever to set a set of goals or a mission — military mission where you can’t be confident of accomplishing your objectives. And as we have seen in the past, regime change is a very complicated business. It sometimes takes a long time. Sometimes it can happen very fast, but it was never part of the military mission. TAPPER: NATO has assumed control and command for the no-fly zone or is this weekend but not yet for the civilian protection. When do we anticipate that happening? GATES: Hillary’s been more engaged with that diplomacy than I have. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, SECRETARY OF STATE: Well, we hope, Jake, that NATO, which is making the military planning for the civilian protection mission, will meet in the next few days, make a decision which we expect to be positive to include that mission, and then just as the arms embargo and the no-fly zone has been transitioned to NATO command and control, the civilian protection mission will as well. TAPPER: what do you say to the people in Ivory Coast or Syria who say where’s our no-fly zone? We’re being killed by our government too. CLINTON: Well, there’s not an aircraft — there’s not an air force being used. There is not the same level of force. The situation is significantly different enough that the world has not come together. However, in Ivory Coast we have a U.N. peacekeeping force which we are supporting. We are beginning to see the world coalesce around the very obvious fact that Mr. Gbagbo no longer is president. Mr. Ouattara is the president. So you know, each of these situations is different but in Libya when a leader says spare nothing, show no mercy and calls out air — air force attacks on his own people, that crosses a line that people in the world had decided they could not tolerate. TAPPER: When do we know that the mission is done? The no-fly zone has succeeded, civilian protection has stopped, when — when do you — GATES: I would say, for all practical purposes, the implementation of a no-fly zone is complete. Now it will need to be sustained, but it can be sustained with a lot less effort than what it took to set it up. As I indicated in my testimony on the Hill, you don’t establishment a no-fly zone by just declaring it. You go in and suppress the air defenses and that mission is largely complete. I think we have made a lot of progress on the humanitarian side and his ability to move armor, to move toward a Benghazi or a place like that has — has pretty well been eliminated. Now we’ll have to keep our eye on it because he still has ground forces at his beck and call. But the reality is they’re under a lot of pressure. Their logistics — there are some signs that they’re moving back to the east — back to the west away from Ajdabiya and other places. So I think that we have prevented the large scale slaughter that was beginning to take place, has taken place in some places. And so I think that we are at a point where — where the establishment of the no-fly zone and the protection of cities from the kind of wholesale military assault that we have seen certainly in the East has been accomplished and now we can move to sustainment. CLINTON: You know, Jake, I would just add two points to what Secretary Gates said. The United States Senate called for a no-fly zone in the resolution that it passed I think on March 1th. And that mission is on the brink of having been accomplished. And there was a lot of congressional support to do something. There is no perfect option when one is looking at a situation like this. I think that the president ordered the best available option. The United States worked with the international community to make sure that there was authorization to do what we have helped to accomplish. But what is quite remarkable here is that NATO assuming the responsibility for the entire mission means that the United States will move to a supporting role. Just as our allies are helping us in Afghanistan where we bear the disproportionate amount of sacrifice and the cost, we are supporting a mission through NATO that was very much initiated by European requests joined by Arab requests. I think this is a watershed moment in international decision making. We learned a lot in the 1990s. We saw what happened in Rwanda. It took a long time in the Balkans, in Kosovo to deal with a tyrant. But I think in — what has happened since March 1st and we’re not even done with the month demonstrates really remarkable leadership. GATES: I would just add one other thing in sort of a concrete manifestation where we are in this and that is we and the Department of Defense are already beginning to do our planning in terms of beginning to draw down resources. First from support of the no-fly zone and then from the humanitarian mission. Now that may not start in the next day or two, but I certainly expect it to in the very near future. TAPPER: Well, I wanted to follow on that. How long are we going to be there in this support role? GATES: Well, I think that, as I say, we — we will begin diminishing the level of our engagement, the level of resources we have involved in this, but as long as there is a no-fly zone and we have some unique capabilities to bring to bear, for example, intelligence, surveillance and recognizance, some tanking ability, we will continue to have a presence. But a lot of these — a lot of the forces that we will have available other than the ISR are forces that are already assigned to Europe or have been assigned to Italy or at sea in the Mediterranean. TAPPER: I’ve heard NATO say that this — they anticipate — some NATO officials say this could be three months, but people in the Pentagon think it could be far longer than that. Do you think we’ll be gone by the end of the year? Will the mission be over by the end of the year? GATES: I don’t think anybody knows the answer to that. TAPPER: Do you think Libya posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States? GATES: No, no. It was not — it was not a vital national interest to the United States, but it was an interest and it was an interest for all of the reasons Secretary Clinton talked about. The engagement of the Arabs, the engagement of the Europeans, the general humanitarian question that was at stake. There was another piece of this though that certainly was a consideration. You’ve had revolutions on both the East and the West of Libya. TAPPER: Egypt and Tunisia. GATES: Egypt and Tunisia. So you had a potentially significantly destabilizing event taking place in Libya that put at risk potentially the revolutions in both Tunisia and Egypt. And that was another consideration I think we took into account. TAPPER: Secretary Clinton, how does — CLINTON: Jake, I just want to add too because, you know, I know that there’s been a lot of questions and those questions deserve to be asked and answered. The president is going to address the nation on Monday night. Imagine we were sitting here and Benghazi had been overrun, a city of 700,000 people, and tens of thousands of people had been slaughtered, hundreds of thousands had fled and, as Bob said, either with nowhere to go or overwhelming Egypt while it’s in its own difficult transition. And we were sitting here, the cries would be, why did the United States not do anything? Why — how could you stand by when, you know, France and the United Kingdom and other Europeans and the Arab League and your Arab partners were saying you’ve got to do something. So every decision that we make is going to have plusses and minuses. TAPPER: You heard the Secretary of Defense say that Libya did not pose an actual or imminent threat to the nation and bearing in mind what you just said, I’m still wondering how the administration reconciles the attack without congressional approval with then candidate Obama saying in 2007 the president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation and, as a senator, you, yourself in 2007 said this about President Bush. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) CLINTON: If the administration believes that any — any use of force against Iran is necessary, the president must come to Congress to seek that authority. (END AUDIO CLIP) TAPPER: Why not go to Congress? CLINTON: Well, we would welcome congressional support, but I don’t think that this kind of internationally authorized intervention where we are one of a number of countries participating to enforce a humanitarian mission is the kind of unilateral action that either I or President Obama were — was speaking of several years ago. I think that this had a limited timeframe, a very clearly defined mission which we are in the process of fulfilling. TAPPER: I want to get to a couple other topics before you guys go and one of them is in Yemen President Saleh a crucial ally in counterterrorism seems quite on his way out. Secretary Gates, you said this week we have not done any post-Saleh planning. How dangerous is a post-Saleh world — a post-Saleh Yemen to the United States? GATES: Well, I think — I think it is a real concern because the most active and, at this point, perhaps the most aggressive branch of al Qaeda — al Qaeda and the Arabian Peninsula operates out of Yemen. And we have had a lot of counterterrorism cooperation from President Saleh and Yemeni Security Services. So if that government collapses or is replaced by one that is dramatically more weak, then I think we’ll face some additional challenges out of Yemen. There’s no question about it. It’s a real problem. TAPPER: Secretary Clinton, on Pakistan. Pakistan has been trying to block U.S. counterterrorism efforts in the FATA region, it continues to work with terrorists to attack India, it held a U.S. diplomat in its presence for several weeks, as I don’t need to tell you. Has this relationship gotten worse in the last six months, U.S. Pakistan? CLINTON: Well, Jake, it’s a very challenging relationship because there have been some — some problems. We were very appreciative of getting our diplomat out of Pakistan and that took cooperation by the government of Pakistan. We have cooperated very closely together in going after terrorists who pose a threat to both us and the Pakistanis themselves. But it’s a — it’s a very difficult relationship because Pakistan is in a hard position trying to figure out how it’s going to contend with its own internal extremist threat. But I think on the other hand, we’ve also developed good lines of communication, good opportunities for cooperation, but it’s something we have to work on every day. TAPPER: And finally, we’ve talked a bit about the end of this operation, how it ends. I’m wondering if you can envision the United States supporting a plan where Gadhafi is exiled. Would the U.S. be willing to support Safe Haven and Unity from prosecution and access to funds as a way to end this conflict? CLINTON: Well, Jake, we are nowhere near that kind of negotiation. I’ll be going to London on Tuesday for a conference that the British government is hosting. There will be a number of countries, not only those participating in the — the enforcement of the resolution, but also those who are pursuing political and other interventions. And the United Nations has a special envoy who will also be actively working with Gadhafi and those around him. We have sent a clear message that it is time for him to transition out of power. The African Union has now called for a democratic transition. We think that there will be developments along that line in the weeks and months ahead, but I can’t sitting here today predict to you exactly how it’s going to play out. But we believe that Libya will have a better shot in the future if he departs and leaves power. TAPPER: All right. Secretaries Clinton, Secretary Gates, thank you so much for joining us. CLINTON: Thank you.

Continue reading …
Chris Wallace Scolds White House for Not Scheduling Clinton and Gates on Fox News Sunday

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were featured guests on all the broadcast network Sunday morning shows with the exception of the one on Fox. Host Chris Wallace was clearly unhappy about this, and let his viewers know (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS WALLACE: Of course we wanted to get the White House view on Libya. However, they chose to offer Secretary of State Clinton and Defense Secretary Gates to ABC, CBS and NBC, but not to Fox. Despite the fact that we routinely have more viewers than two of those Sunday shows, the Obama team felt no need to explain to the millions of you who watch this program and Fox News why they have sent U.S. servicemen and women into combat. We thought you’d like to know. As Jeff Poor accurately noted at the Daily Caller, Clinton and Gates appeared on ABC's “This Week,” CBS's “Face the Nation,” and NBC's “Meet the Press.” However, I was a little confused by Wallace's claim “we routinely have more viewers than two of those Sunday shows.” According to “TV by the Numbers,” “Fox News Sunday” got slaughtered last week by its three broadcast rivals: (Sunday, March 20, 2011) TOTAL VIEWERS A25-54 MM/Rtg ABC “THIS WEEK”

Continue reading …
So long overnight TV

Apparently, broadcasting programmes through the night costs the BBC £150m a year. So, in order to meet its target of 20% cuts, director general Mark Thompson has warned that the corporation could be forced to take a major channel off air overnight. And this is supposed to put the wind up us? Whenever anyone mentions cuts, either to the arts or public services, well-meaning folks feel obliged to groan and wail and gnash. But this sounds like a brilliant idea to me, quite apart from the money-saving aspect. I mean, why not turn telly off overnight? Closedown is, or was, one of those old-fashioned, late-night rituals that wormed its way into our culture, like listening to the shipping forecast. The test card was another, with its sinister grinning clown and that nice girl stuck in a geometric no-place, condemned to play – or not play – noughts and crosses for ever. Such things, when they go, are rightly missed. One of the important things about telly was that sometimes it stopped. We can feel nostalgia for the sour-sweet satisfactions of the cathode ray tube whining down to a faint white dot, then a spectral after-image, before vanishing altogether. But, in the plasma age, we can’t really hope to get that back. Those hours of dead air afterwards, on the other hand – that’s something we can all still aspire to. There used to be a mysterious and melancholy atmosphere to late-night TV: a sense that you had stumbled into a world that ordinary people weren’t really meant to see. All those Open University professors, for instance, with wide brown ties and spectacles made of Bakelite. But the key thing was you didn’t expect it to be on. It felt – well, not transgressive exactly, but different in character than, say, the 6pm-10pm slots. Now that everything is on 24 hours a day (and by “everything” I mean CSI: Miami and Late Night Poker), the magic has gone. Who’s watching that telly anyway? Twentysomethings rattling with drugs, thirtysomethings slumped in alcoholic stupors, fortysomething insomniacs with eyes like stab wounds, and elderly people who are, well, just sort of afraid to fall asleep. Not the most attentive of audiences. For most people, watching telly at 4am is what you might call “passive television watching”. It is the TV-watching you do when you have tipped over the point at which going to bed is, in defiance of all the laws of common sense, actually more of an effort than watching another half-hour of telly. Again, most people would only be watching TV at that time of night if sticking something on Sky+ or iPlayer was too much of a pain. By that stage you are, effectively, one of the living dead. By that stage, the telly is watching you. The point has been made to me that, were closedown to be reinstated, the major losers would be the deaf, since much of the wee small hours are dedicated to the Sign Zone, where programmes are rescreened with signing accompaniment. Fair point. But I don’t think it’s an insuperable objection. Among other things, why should the deaf have to lose sleep? The

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews’ Panel Thinks Haley Barbour Can Overcome His Racist Past

Click here to view this media You’ve got to love this one. Chris Matthews on his weekend show put it to his “Matthews Meter” and asked his regulars if “serious candidate” Haley Barbour “can run as a Southern alternative [to Barack Obama] without appearing racially insensitive?” And what was their overwhelming response? By 11 to 1 they said yes he can. Howard Fineman took the first turn out of the box defending Barbour. MATTHEWS: Howard, you said he can get away with that sort of geographic appeal and Southern boy appeal without raising the old American problem. FINEMAN: Well, he can’t just get away with it, he can do it, but he’s got to be careful. There is no margin for error. And he’s made a couple of pre-season errors here in some of his comments about how the controversy in Virginia over black history month didn’t mean diddly… MATTHEWS: Confederate month… FINEMAN: Confederate month didn’t mean diddly, etc., etc. MATTHEWS: The Citizens Councils were pretty cool… FINEMAN: But well, I think he is playing to the Southern old boy vote, there’s no question about the good old boy vote, there’s no question. But I think he can do it in still try to sell himself to the rest of the country if he’s careful. I’ve covered him for years. I’ve known him for a long time. He’s a very smart guy and he’s doing what you advised in your book, Hardball, which is if you have a problem… MATTHEWS: Hang a lantern on it… FINEMAN: Hang a lantern on it… I was a lobbyist, and I was a darn good lobbyist. Yeah, who cares that he was a lobbyist , or that he’s paling around with the KKK CCC , or that he’s tried to rewrite the Civil Rights movement in the South . Why would anyone care about any of that? This just reeks of the same treatment they gave George W. Bush as just some regular guy everybody “would like to have a beer with” when that was about the furthest thing from the truth. Major Garrett apparently thinks that if someone who worked for Jeb Bush supports Barbour now, that somehow means Barbour can’t possibly be a racist. Well thanks Major. I’m glad you cleared that up for us. Matthews wrapped things up by asking whether this “charmer” (And, yes, they were talking about Haley Barbour) from the South has what it takes to win over the public to which Howard Fineman responded with this fawning praise of Barbour. MATTHEWS: Howard, I think he has something, and you touched on it. He has a personality. And some of these and what most people are looking for in this election, with whatever their party politics are, they want a personality, a recognizable human being. And Pawlenty and Romney and these guys and Newt don’t seem to be at least a kind of human being you want to hang out with. FINEMAN: Here’s the funny thing about it Haley having known him for a long time. When he was Republican Part chair, he’s one of the shrewdest political operators we’ve ever seen. But yet he doesn’t come off like somebody manufactured by politics. In fact he’s lived his whole life in politics… MATTHEWS: You don’t see the seams. FINEMAN: You don’t see the seams. It’s all effortless to him. It doesn’t look mechanical to him and that’s very appealing. MATTHEWS: Howard, you’re the best…. He really is that shrewd a pol. Well, he’s only that shrewd a pol if you let him get away with it, and after watching this segment it’s pretty obvious that’s exactly what our beltway Villagers are planning to do.

Continue reading …
The last yarn of Bradford mill

Workers once came from all over the world to work in Lumb Lane. Now the defunct Bradford mill is being used to stage their stories Lumb Lane was, for a long time, Bradford’s most notorious address. Once the main kerb-crawling route through the city’s red light district, the road was synonymous with race riots, sex workers and serial killers. It was here that Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, committed his first murders. But today Lumb Lane is a peaceful, if slightly down-at-heel strip of mosques, mini-cab firms and grocery stores run by eastern Europeans. Yet there are signs of life stirring in what was once the industrial heart of the area: the seven-acre James Drummond and Sons complex. Known locally as Lumb Lane mill, Drummonds opened in 1886 and soon became a yarn-producing powerhouse, providing employment for the entire region. The mill staggered on through the postwar period, mostly employing immigrants from Ireland, eastern Europe, Ukraine and Pakistan. But the gates finally closed in 2001, and they remained that way until a group of theatre-makers came along. The Mill: City of Dreams is the fruit of their labours, an ambitious promenade event that will lead audiences through Drummonds’ dark, abandoned spaces, discovering intimate, dramatic reconstructions of the lives of former workers. The script, which has been boiled down from hundreds of hours of interviews with residents and ex-mill-workers, is the brainchild of writer and director Madani Younis, of Bradford’s Freedom Studios company, with guidance from Jonathan Holmes, a specialist in whopping site-specific events. In 2007, Holmes staged his play Fallujah, about the siege of the Iraqi city, in an old London brewery; two years later, his play Katrina recreated the aftermath of the hurricane in a five-storey warehouse on the South Bank. The audience has an active part to play in The Mill: you enter via a smart sales suite, where a team of developers attempt to sell you a vision of the mill regenerated into luxury apartments. Yet instead of show flats, you find haunting vignettes of the mill’s former life, played by a cast of professional actors augmented by a large chorus of local volunteers. Yet Drummonds is so vast that simply walking through the abandoned space is a drama in itself. Stripped of machinery, the weaving shed is a rust-stained expanse the size of a football pitch, its long corridors lined with offices and cubby holes. The architectural climax, though, is on the top floor: a barrel-shaped glasshouse lined with curving wooden struts. It’s like standing in the ribcage of a giant whale. “This was the wool-sorting floor,” says Younis. “It still stank of lanolin when we first came in.” The workshop was freezing in winter and a furnace in summer, but sorting wool fibres had to be done in daylight. Younis became intrigued by the fate of Bradford’s redundant mills when he first moved to the area and discovered that the majority were either abandoned or being used as social centres and snooker halls. “The

Continue reading …
When the Obamas go out for dinner …

They are accompanied by up to 30 burly Secret Service agents and the other diners are scanned for concealed weapons. But what about our PM? What happens when the president of the United States fancies going out for a meal? He brings a lot more burly men in black suits than our prime minister. According to the Washington Post, when the first family visit a restaurant, they eat quietly, say hello to the chef and leave a “nice, but not crazy, tip”. It’s the Secret Service who really go

Continue reading …
Lily Allen’s TV show is satire

Lily is parodying the assumption that because a celebrity likes clothes she’s the reincarnation of Coco Chanel . . . or something I have found myself to be strangely gripped by that TV show, Lily Allen Opens a Shop, or whatever it’s called . Is that all it takes to open a

Continue reading …
Stallone is to launch a clothing line

Here’s what we’re hoping for from the Rocky and Rambo star’s menswear label This autumn, Academy Award winner Sly Stallone faces his greatest challenge yet: the film legend is launching his very own clothing line. Stallone’s menswear will be based on his two most iconic characters, Rambo and Rocky, and will feature – in the words of the designer – “looks for the rebel and the gentleman”. Here are the key pieces we’re desperately hoping for. • A deluxe headband. Sly reckons that the line will be “premium”, so we’re holding out for something in six-ply cashmere that says “soldier-chic”. • An olive-green vest. Scoop-necked and a bit military. A menswear cliché perhaps, but the Stallone interpretation could be styled with a gold pendant. One for Cristiano Ronaldo

Continue reading …
Madagascar rejects unity government

Three groups, led by former presidents, refuse to initial road map aimed at ending two-year impasse Three opposition groups in Madagascar have rejected a new unity government named as part of a road map to end a two-year impasse. The government, named on Saturday, has 23 new ministers while nine members of the previous administration retain their posts – including the ministers of finance, mines and hydrocarbons, justice, defence, and the environment and forests. The groups, led by former presidents Marc Ravalomanana, Didier Ratsiraka and Albert Zafy, declined to initial the plan, which allows Andry Rajoelina, who grabbed power with military support in 2009, to remain president until free and fair elections are held. Rajoelina did, however, include some members of the party founded by Ravalomanana and some dissidents within his movement. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) had long called for Rajoelina to go so Ravalomanana could return to power, but it shifted its stance earlier this year by approving the plan to leave Rajoelina in office until elections. The prime minister, Camille Vital, said he thought the new government was inclusive and that SADC would accept it. A member of Zafy’s group, however, said the government had been formed unilaterally by Rajoelina’s transitional administration to buy more time. An official in Ravalomanana’s movement said that until the road map had been signed, the current administration had no business appointing a new government. The political deadlock has hurt Madagascar’s economy after donors froze budgetary support worth hundreds of millions of dollars a year. Government spending dried up and private investment slowed sharply after the power grab. An independent electoral commission and UN representatives will agree a date for the election based on evaluations of how soon a credible vote can be held. Madagascar guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …