Click here to view this media Is Pastor Terry Jones happy now? The controversial Florida pastor who halted plans to burn a Quran on the 9/11 anniversary last year oversaw the burning of the Islamic holy book on Sunday after it was found “guilty” during a “trial” at his church. “We had a court process,” said Pastor Terry Jones , who acted as judge, in a phone interview. “We tried to set it up as fair as possible, which you can imagine, of course, is very difficult.” Jones originally gave up the idea of a Koran burning, but I guess life got boring without some media attention following Rep. Peter King’s fearmongering hearings. Jones’s ignorant book burning took place a little over a week ago, though it was largely ignored in the American media. From the Christian Science Monitor : Jones decided to go through with the burning on March 20 after serving as judge in a “trial” of the Muslim holy book. He found it “guilty” of “training and promoting terrorist activities … death, rape, torture of people worldwide” and crimes against women and minorities. Gross — and grossly irresponsible — provocations like that always have consequences: Afghans Angry Over Florida Koran Burning Kill U.N. Staff Stirred up by a trio of angry mullahs who urged them to avenge the burning of a Koran at a Florida church, thousands of protesters overran the compound of the United Nations in this northern Afghan city, killing at least 12 people, Afghan and United Nations officials said. The dead included at least seven United Nations workers — five Nepalese guards and two Europeans, one of them a woman. None were Americans. Early reports, later denied by Afghan officials, said that at least two of the dead had been beheaded. Five Afghans were also killed. The attack was the deadliest for the United Nations in Afghanistan since 11 people were killed in 2009 , when Taliban suicide bombers invaded a guesthouse in Kabul. It also underscored the latent hostility toward the nine-year foreign presence here, even in a city long considered to be among the safest in Afghanistan — so safe that American troops no longer patrol here in any numbers. Unable to find Americans on whom to vent their anger, the mob turned instead on the next-best symbol of Western intrusion — the nearby United Nations headquarters. “Some of our colleagues were just hunted down,” said a spokesman for the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, Kieran Dwyer, confirming that the attack. In Washington, President Obama issued a statement strongly condemning the violence against United Nations workers. “Their work is essential to building a stronger Afghanistan for the benefit of all its citizens,” he said. “We stress the importance of calm and urge all parties to reject violence.” The statement made no reference to the Florida church or the burning of the Koran . Afghanistan, deeply religious and reflexively volatile, has long been one of the most reactive flashpoints to perceived insults against Islam. When a Danish cartoonist lampooned the Prophet Muhammad, four people were killed in riots in Afghanistan within days in 2006. The year before, a one-paragraph item in Newsweek alleging that guards at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had flushed a Koran down the toilet set off three days of riots that left 14 dead in Afghanistan. Friday’s episode began when three mullahs, addressing worshipers at Friday Prayer inside the Blue Mosque here, one of Afghanistan’s holiest places, urged people to take to the streets to agitate for the arrest of Terry Jones , the Florida pastor who oversaw the burning of a Koran on March 20. I’m not justifying the murder spree that just happened in Afghanistan. It’s truly unconscionable to see this type of violence carried out against innocent people and it’s unforgivable, but it didn’t happen in a vacuum. I just don’t understand why people who say they are religious of any kind in America need to engage in this type of thing. I know many of them who act out like this aren’t very stable — and in the case of Pastor Jones, a case could be made that he’s just sociopathic — but the GOP as a political party was very silent when Jones started his Koran burning 9/11 tribute, while Fox News, by Jones’ own account, was “sympathetic.” Maybe it’s time for some of their party leaders to tell them to calm down. If you’ve forgotten about the original Terry Jones story, here’s a video post by Heather giving you some context. Joan Walsh Explains to Ed Schultz How and Why the Media Dustup over Terry Jones Started Salon’s Justin Elliott writes: How (and why) the media made Terry Jones a star : When Gen. David Petraeus first spoke out against Pastor Terry Jones’ planned Quran burning in a Wall Street Journal article published Monday, the story exploded in the U.S. media, going from a sideshow to the dominant national media controversy of the week. As Yahoo News reported , it was on the front page of more than 50 newspapers Thursday — more than the total number of members of Jones’ fringe Florida church. Critics of the American media’s coverage of the Quran-burning saga are loud and plentiful, and they have a strong case. In short, the U.S. media has given a global platform to a fringe pastor with a tiny flock, elevating him to a level of significance that would make most members of Congress jealous ( whether or not he actually executes his plan). But those media critics are also missing the point. To grasp the real story here, one has to understand the context in which Petraeus decided to weigh in: At that time, the Quran burning had already been treated as a major story in the media in the Muslim world for several weeks. In other words, since at least late July, when it started to get attention in some Muslim-majority countries, the story has been doing untold damage to America’s reputation. “It was a big issue over in the Arab media before U.S. media picked it up,” Marc Lynch, director of Institute for Middle East Studies at George Washington University, told Salon in an e-mail. Digby links a piece by the UN Dispatch that shares the feelings of Una Moore, a UN aid worker in Kabul: I don’t know what to say about the horror in Afghanistan. This post at UN Dispatch from Una Moore, a UN aid worker in Kabul, says it all: Foreigners have been killed in Afghanistan before, and today’s attack was not the first fatal attack on UN staff. But it was different than previous fatal attacks. Very different. The killers were ordinary residents of a city deemed peaceful enough to be one of the first places transferred to the control of Afghan security forces. The men who broke into the UN compound, set fires and killed 8 people weren’t Taliban, or henchmen of a brutal warlord, or members of a criminal gang. They weren’t even armed when the protests began –they took weapons from the UN guards who were their first victims. Foreigners committed to assisting in the rebuilding of Afghanistan have long accepted the possibility that they might die at the hands of warring parties, but this degree of violence from ordinary citizens is not something most of us factored into our decision to work here. Tonight, the governor of Balkh province, of which Mazar-i-Sharif is the capital, is telling the international media that the men who sacked the UN compound were Taliban infiltrators. That’s rubbish. Local clerics drove around the city with megaphones yesterday, calling residents to protest the actions of a small group of attention-seeking, bigoted Americans. Then, during today’s protest, someone announced that not just one, but hundreds of Korans had been burned in America. A throng of enraged men rushed the gates of the UN compound, determined to draw blood. Had the attackers been gunmen, they would likely have been killed before they could breach the compound. I was sharing a meal with aid worker friends when I heard the news. Phones began buzzing. Security officers were demanding that my friends return to their compounds immediately. Cars had already been sent to retrieve them. Lockdown was in force. This is not the beginning of the end for the international community in Afghanistan. This is the end. Terry Jones and others will continue to pull anti-Islam stunts and opportunistic extremists here will use those actions to incite attacks against foreigners. Unless we, the internationals, want our guards to fire on unarmed protestors from now on, the day has come for us to leave Afghanistan. There is no excuse for Afghan religious extremists to kill UN aid workers because some other religious extremist in Florida decided to burn a book. On the other hand, there is no excuse for a major faction of one of the political parties in America to fan the flames of religious extremist in Florida for cheap political gain — they bear some share of the blame for this too. They created the public space for this bigotry with their stupid mosque protests and congressional hearings and there’s a price to be paid when that kind of ignorance and intolerance is given credibility by major players in our political system. Those UN workers paid that price today. Updates are still coming in, but the death toll is rising: The death toll in an attack on a U.N. compound Friday could be as high as 20 after a protest turned violent in response to a reported Quran-burning in the United States, officials said. At least two of those killed were beheaded, Reuters said. The United Nations confirmed that seven of its international employees had been killed when protesters overran the compound in northern Afghanistan… read on Did Pastor Terry Jones get the outcome he was really looking for?
Continue reading …Floods, earthquakes, landslides: 2011 is a year of disasters. Bill McKibben asks: are we to blame? Plus, survivors tell their tales • In pictures: This year’s catastrophes At least since Noah, and likely long before, we’ve stared in horror at catastrophe and tried to suss out deeper meaning – it was but weeks ago that the Tokyo governor, Shintaro Ishihara, declared that the earthquake/tsunami/ reactor tripleheader was “divine punishment ” for excess consumerism. This line of reasoning usually fails to persuade these days (why are Las Vegas and Dubai unscathed by anything except the housing meltdown?) but it’s persistent. We need some explanation for why our stable world is suddenly cracked in half or under water. Still, over time we’ve become less superstitious, since science can explain these cataclysms. Angry gods or plate tectonics? We’re definitely moving towards natural explanation of crises. Which is odd, because the physical world is moving in the other direction. The Holocene – the 10,000 years through which we have just come – was by all accounts a period of calm and stability on Earth. Temperatures and sea levels were relatively stable. Hence it was an excellent time to build a civilisation, especially the modern kind that comes with lots of stuff: roads, buildings, container ports, nuclear reactors. Yes, we had disasters throughout those millennia, some of them ( Krakatoa , say) simply enormous. Hurricanes blew, earthquakes rocked. But they were, by
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Times Leader I am firmly in favor of there not being a religious test to hold office. But more and more, I think we might need to institute a basic competency test. [Freshman Rep. Tom Marino (R-PA) was] quoted in the Times-Tribune questioning President Obama’s Libya strategy, and lack of deference to Congress. “The bottom line is I wish the president would have told us, talked to Congress about what is the plan. Is there a plan? Is the mission to take Gadhafi out?” Mr. Marino asked…. “Where does it stop?” he said. ” Do we go into Africa next ? I don’t want to sound callous or cold, but this could go on indefinitely around the world.” Okay, just in case someone reading this is a geographically-challenged as Marino, let me clarify: enlarge Libya is part of the continent of Africa. Continent. Africa is NOT a country. I say that only because it’s a little unclear from Marino’s speech. Is it too much to ask our Representatives to at least have a high school level grasp of geography before they sit on the Foreign Affairs Committee ? In his defense, a spokesperson for Marino said that while accurate, his quote was misunderstood : Marino’s spokeswoman Renita Fennick said Thursday the congressman was quoted correctly, but readers, including those at the Inquirer, apparently misunderstood his comment. There are no U.S. soldiers on the ground fighting in Africa, Fennick said, and Marino wants to keep it that way. “We are not in Africa. There were missile strikes, but many of those missiles were launched from Missouri,” Fennick said. “The congressman’s position is that we don’t want to go into Africa, (but) a few days of missile strikes does not put us on a continent.” Fennick said Marino’s office was “baffled” about how the quote could have been misunderstood. I’m baffled that they thought this clarification would help them.
Continue reading …Newsweek's Evan Thomas on Friday took a swipe at the White House's handling of its operation in Libya. As the subject was raised on PBS's “Inside Washington,” Thomas said, “In this case, it’s always hard to know what the Administration is doing because it’s sort of a headless horse” (video follows with transcript and commentary): GORDON PETERSON, HOST: I keep thinking about “Charlie Wilson’s War.” We arm the mujahideen to get rid of the Russians, or to deal with the Russians, and then all of a sudden, the law of unintended consequences kicks in. EVAN THOMAS, NEWSWEEK: I mean, Secretary Gates said he didn’t want to get in the arming business yesterday, at least speaking for himself. It’s hard to know what the, in this case, it’s always hard to know what the Administration is doing because it’s sort of a headless… CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: What administration? THOMAS: What administration – it’s a headless horse. For those not familiar with the 2007 film, “Charlie Wilson's War” was about former Congressman Charlie Wilson (D-Tx.) funneling funds to help the CIA with its covert operation of assisting the mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight the Soviet invaders.
Continue reading …Milan judge rules there is not enough evidence to support accusations against the Italian designers Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana will no longer have to worry about what to wear in court. Italian fashion’s most powerful design duo have been told they will not stand trial for an alleged €1bn (£880m) tax dodge after a judge in Milan threw out the case against them at a preliminary hearing. The pair have built one of the world’s largest fashion brands, beloved of celebrities such as Madonna and Kylie. They were accused of fraud of around €1bn as part of an inquiry into reports the company had failed to declare €840m in revenues. Both designers, Dolce’s brother Alfonso and three other senior members of the company were accused but all denied the charges. Judge Simone Luerti ruled there was not enough evidence to take the Milanese designers to trial, and closed the file on other people who had been under investigation as well. The reported allegation was that Dolce & Gabbana created a company in Luxembourg in 2004 and 2005 which was given control of the group’s two brands – the main label and its younger line D&G – so avoiding Italian taxes. It is unlikely that sales of their brand of “molto-sexy” clothes will have been affected by this near brush with scandal. Dolce and Gabbana are a superstar partnership – there are stores in 34 countries – who have masterminded an instantly recognisable high-end Euro-look. They are central to the Milanese fashion notion of “more is more”. Alongside super-sexy ads, the brand’s success has been based on its ability to sell well-tailored suiting and glitzy party dresses alongside more affordable branded items including T-shirts, jeans, perfume, sunglasses and makeup. This is not the first controversy Dolce and Gabbana have weathered. Three years ago, they came under fire over an advertisement that was accused of exalting gang rape: it showed a woman being held down on the ground by a man while other men looked on. In 2009, Giorgio Armani accused the couple of having copied a design for quilted trousers – a charge Dolce and Gabbana contemptuously dismissed. Dolce & Gabbana Fashion Italy Europe Imogen Fox guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …It’s sort of the same mind filter through which New Gingrich attacked Bill Clinton for being an immoral adulterer, and Sen. Larry Craig worked to preserve the sanctity of marriage. Are we seeing a pattern yet? WASHINGTON — Democrats pounced on the man Republicans chose today to be their spokesman for fiscal restraint: a freshman Arkansas congressman who once filed bankruptcy over unpaid credit card bills. Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) was the lead signer of a letter endorsed by a pack of GOP freshmen demanding Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) pass a budget-cutting spending measure to fund the government for the rest of this fiscal year.”Mr. Reid, your record on spending in the Senate is one of failure,” wrote the 30 lawmakers, who also vowed to rally on the Capitol steps until the Senate passed a budget. “You have failed to pass a budget, failed to restrain spending, and failed to put our country on sound fiscal footing,” they said. But Crawford seemed an odd choice to expound on sound fiscal footing.”Really?” said Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Jesse Ferguson. “Of all the people for House Republican freshmen to pick as their front man for a stunt about fiscal responsibility, they picked Representative Rick Crawford who couldn’t even pay his own credit card bills and went bankrupt because of it,” Ferguson said in a statement. According to press accounts during Crawford’s campaign, he declared bankruptcy in 1994 over $12,611.67 in debt – mostly for credit cards.
Continue reading …World’s longest-running children’s programme could be shown exclusively on CBBC freeing up space on BBC1 It has survived a cocaine outrage, phone-in scandal, kitten-naming debacle and an amusingly mischievous elephant. But after more than 50 years on screen, Blue Peter’s place in the BBC1 schedules is facing a new threat. The removal of children’s TV from BBC1 in the afternoon is being discussed by the cash-strapped corporation as part of its Delivering Quality First initiative, designed to save millions. The world’s longest-running children’s programme would be shown exclusively on the digital channel CBBC, which already airs Blue Peter repeats and spin-offs – freeing up space on BBC1 for adult daytime programming. “It is important to stress that this is only one of many DQF proposals and there are no immediate proposals to remove children’s content from the BBC’s terrestrial channels,” said a BBC spokeswoman. The corporation’s research has shown that the number of children who watch CBBC content exclusively on BBC1 is declining. The BBC is looking at a number of options in a bid to save £20m, including ditching overnight programmes on BBC1, or replacing the entire BBC2 daytime schedule with rolling news. Children’s TV Television Vicky Frost guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …More than half of the BBC Breakfast team’s employees have rejected the move north “Salford or fuck it” was the not very subtle title of the BBC Breakfast team’s farewell party held at a candlelit wine bar near White City. Presenter Sian Williams and more than half of the 86 programme staff have decided not to make the move 180 miles north – but the BBC still says that is a victory in its contentious £200m move out of the capital. Employees have been offered relocation packages worth £45,600 (£1,900 a month over two years) but only 861 jobs of 1,500 moving north have been filled – while Breakfast, Radio 5 Live and Blue Peter will all have to battle to persuade the likes of David Cameron or Keira Knightley to appear in the studio. Of the BBC Breakfast staff, 46% are relocating – as are similar proportions of Radio 5 Live and BBC Sport teams. The BBC said these numbers were “significantly higher” than hoped. BBC executives, trying to manage expectations, had indicated that if a third of the employees agreed to go, that would be seen as a “strong result”. Some big names appear keen to at least present their shows from the north-west, such as 5 Live presenters Nicky Campbell and Richard Bacon, but others less so. Gary Lineker, whose current contract with the BBC expires after the Olympics, is unenthusiastic about commuting from his west London home to present Match of the Day. And Lineker is not someone whose BBC duties are so intense that he would have to move house. Nevertheless, the BBC does not want all of its existing people to move. Former BBC chairman Lord Grade said it was “essential” that the Salford move be completed because “otherwise the BBC can’t be a national broadcaster”. He added: “It’s good news if not everybody goes up because then new people can come in. You’ll even get some vacancies at the top.” However, some BBC Breakfast employees are dissatisfied about how the transfer is being handled. Breakfast was a late inclusion in the Salford plan because the BBC had to send extra posts north to meet the requirements of a seven-figure grant from the Northwest Regional Development Agency . The most repeated criticism at an organisation where “most people don’t see the point or expense of the move” is – in the words of one veteran journalist – that the man in charge, BBC North director Peter Salmon, is only renting a house and not moving his family. Nor is Five Live controller Adrian Van Klaveren initially relocating to Salford full-time. One source at BBC Breakfast said there are still reservations about the move: “There is much cynicism over an email from Peter Salmon welcoming Breakfast to ‘this exciting opportunity’ considering he is not initially moving his family.” Yet anyone visiting the new Media–City UK complex where BBC North will be based – it leases the site from commercial company Peel Holdings – would struggle not to be impressed. The light and airy modern buildings overlooking a piazza and Salford Quays are a world away from the much-loved but increasingly decrepit Television Centre. With the Lowry Centre and Old Trafford stadium a stone’s throw away, plus ITV’s new Coronation Street set soon to be built, the area possesses a creative buzz. Meanwhile, the BBC can claim no shortage of interest. A website advertising new jobs has so far had 50,000 individual registrations as people chase work in a region hit hard by public sector cuts. But times may be tough for the hundreds refusing to head north in the hope there will be jobs in London – at a time when the BBC is contracting. For those remaining in the capital as their departments move north, there will be much competition in the BBC’s “internal market” for a diminishing number of roles. However, the north-west offers ex-London dwellers far more for their money. This year, in-house BBC magazine Ariel ran a for-sale ad for Cotes Hall, a grade II listed Georgian house an hour from Salford and on sale for £1.15m – including 1.8 hectares and a helipad. It would be hard to imagine finding a helipad alone for a similar price in London. BBC Salford move BBC Tara Conlan Dan Sabbagh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Record-breaking schedule to gross at least £20m • Comedian takes first 58 shows to 12 biggest arenas Robert Newman and David Baddiel’s pioneering one-off Wembley Arena show in 1993 prompted declarations that comedy was the new rock’n’roll. Eighteen years on, Michael McIntyre is due to play several dozen similar sized gigs, making a strong challenge for the title of the UK scene’s most bankable act. Comedy has never been bigger, with big venues describing it as their fastest growing moneyspinner. Tickets have just gone on sale for McIntyre’s new arena tour – almost 18 months in advance – which could end up being the UK’s biggest and most lucrative. An initial 58 dates have been scheduled at 12 of the UK and Ireland’s biggest venues. If they sell out – and some arenas already report few tickets remaining – McIntyre will perform his winning, defiantly old-fashioned brand of observational humour to about 600,000 people, grossing somewhere north of £20m. It is not as yet officially the biggest ever such tour. Peter Kay is currently resuming a set of dates spread over two years which will see him reach around 750,000 fans, while Lee Evans begins a 66-date stint in August. However, as McIntyre’s initial dates sell out spare nights on his 108-day schedule will inevitably be filled. “It’s certainly one of the biggest UK comedy tours ever announced, and probably the biggest tour announced in one go,” said a spokeswoman for McIntyre, who has also sold 2.5m DVDs. “It is likely there will be a number of extra shows as we go on.” There are two key questions here. The first – how did McIntyre become so popular? – is the slightly more subjective, though his eager, family-friendly style, honed during a decade toiling in the lower echelons of his trade, and TV ubiquity via the likes of his eponymous Comedy Roadshow and Britain’s Got Talent, clearly play a large part. Perhaps more mysterious is tracing the evolution of comedy’s trend away from sweaty clubs to provincial theatres and eventually into aircraft hangar-sized venues. The promoter Mick Perrin organised the UK’s first comedy arena tour, as distinct from Newman and Baddiel’s one off date. He recalls trying to book Eddie Izzard’s 2003 Sexie show: “I’d call up the venues and they’d laugh down the phone – they’d say, ‘You’re not serious.’ No one had tried it before, but Eddie wanted to push the boundaries.” A big factor, he says, has been the new technology of high definition video screens and digital sound: “If you’re going to play an arena you need to be sure that the experience at the back is as good as at the front. It doesn’t come cheap – on Eddie’s tour we had six full trucks and a crew of 45, just for one person.” Another key point, he adds, is that some arena tours are not quite what they seem. “If you use the full venue you might have a crowd of 11,000, but lots of times it might just be a bit sectioned off, maybe 3,500. It sounds good for some comedians to say they’re doing an arena tour, but in fact they’re not playing to many more people than in a large theatre.” What is certain is that it has become just as big a business for venues as well as comics. Phil Mead, head of arenas for the NEC Group, who’s NIA venue in Birmingham is hosting McIntyre for six nights next year, says comedy is the fastest growing part of the business. “Just five years ago comedians accounted for less than 100,000 arena visitors nationwide – now it’s in excess of 1m and shows no sign of fading in popularity.” Glasgow’s SECC saw 15,000 tickets for Kay’s December 2009 stint at the arena sell out within hours, and says McIntyre’s even bigger allocation – five nights in the 9,200-seater main hall – is doing equally well. “It’s certainly a buoyant market,” said Kirsten McAlonan from the venue. “In October alone we’ve got four different comedians. Maybe it’s because it’s a recession and people need a laugh. They’re certainly still willing to spend money on it.” Perrin has a final reason for the move to arenas: today’s super successful brand of comics have the sheer self-belief to firstly believe they can sell enough tickets and then perform in front of such a throng: “I’ve stood on the edge of the stage as they go on and the scale is frightening. But these guys have got egos as big as any rock musician, they can do it. They like the scale – it’s great for them to see that Bon Jovi has just done one date when they’re doing three or four.” Crowd pleasers • Rob Newman and David Baddiel are generally credited with performing the first UK comedy arena date, ending the 1993 live tour of their Newman and Baddiel in Pieces TV show in front of 12,000 people at Wembley Arena. • It took a decade for this to be matched, as Eddie Izzard took his 2003 Sexie tour round a series of arenas. • Lee Evans is credited with a series of comedy scale-of-performance firsts, setting a then world audience record for a solo act in 2005 in front of more than 10,000 people at Manchester’s MEN Arena. His subsequent Big arena tour also became a record-breaker. • With McIntyre and Evans, the third – and arguably biggest – UK comedy behemoth is Peter Kay. His current tour, which kicked off with 20 dates at the MEN Arena and will end with 19 more at the same venue, will net a reported £35m. Michael McIntyre Comedy Peter Walker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Socialist prime minister defends deficit reduction programme as unemployment rate remains at 20% Spain’s beleaguered economy is out of the woods and will not need a Greek or Irish-style bailout despite the risk of contagion from troubled neighbour Portugal, according to its Socialist prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. In an exclusive interview with the partner publications from the Guardian’s New Europe project, the continent’s most powerful leftwing prime minister insisted that reforms and an austerity programme designed to reverse a runaway deficit were bearing fruit. He refused to be drawn on his own plans, amid rumours that he will announce tomorrow that he will not stand for a third term at elections due early next year. His Socialist party currently trails the opposition conservative People’s party by 16 points in opinion polls. The comments, from a prime minister whom Spaniards describe as “anthropologically optimistic”, came as market pressure on the country’s sovereign debt showed signs of relaxing, despite growing problems in both Portugal and Ireland. “We now have economic growth. The debt risk has stabilised and is out of danger. And now we are close to creating jobs,” Zapatero said. Zapatero sees no conflict between being a deficit warrior and a socialist, but points to key differences between his cuts package and that of Britain’s coalition government. “There is a deep, deep difference between what our government has done on education during the crisis and what Cameron’s government has done,” he said, pointing to education spending that has risen to 15% of Spain’s GDP for the first time. “The fundamental difference between right and left is the capacity to redistribute spending and remove obstacles to equal opportunities,” he insisted. “We haven’t reduced spending on health. We’ve increased spending on unemployment. We’ve maintained spending on social care of the dependent. Why do we do it? To maintain social cohesion.” Instead Spain’s government had brought down its deficit by, among other things, cutting civil service pay and freezing pensions. Zapatero said that, having met last year’s deficit reduction target, Spain would also hit this year’s 6% goal. “Our priority measure is the strict meeting of the deficit target,” he said. Although he claimed jobs would be created soon, the timid growth that some critics blame precisely on spending cuts has had no impact on a startling 20% unemployment rate. “My main anguish is about those people who lose benefit payments but have trouble finding work,” he said. Reforms in the pipeline should bring more flexible collective bargaining, improved competitiveness and a law to limit deficit spending, he said. “It’s true that some reforms mean cuts, but others are simply changes,” he said. “No project can call itself leftwing unless it commits to a competitive economy … we are going to renew Spain’s economic structure.” He warned Portugal that if it wanted to escape a bailout it had no option but to adopt the austerity package that its parliament rejected last week, bringing down José Sócrates’ Socialist government and triggering a June election. “Carrying out the Sócrates austerity plan presented to parliament is fundamental,” Zapatero said. His comments came even before Portugal admitted that its 2010 deficit was €3bn (£2.6bn) higher than originally estimated. Zapatero, speaking before Ireland revealed that it needed a further €24bn to deal with its banks, said he favoured more aid to Greece and Ireland. “We should be ready to increase the aid if they need it,” he said. Like most Spanish politicians, he is an avowed pro-European and saw greater economic integration within the EU as an unexpected but welcome side-effect of the crisis. “Economic integration is being speeded up. That much is clear,” he said. “Integration in politics and security is going more slowly, but it will come. It may take five or 10 years, but the process is inevitable.” He admits that, like everyone else, he would have liked Europe to react faster to the economic crisis. “But it is obvious that, amongst democratic countries, there is something called a decision-making process,” he said. “The Spanish government is lucky because parliament is always very pro-European … but there are other parliaments in Europe that debate every last cent.” Even the Libya crisis was an example of Europe in action, he said. “Who brought a historic resolution to the [UN] security council to intervene in Libya? Two European countries: France and Britain,” he said. “It is Europe that has taken the lead.” The man who pulled Spain’s troops out of Iraq when first elected in 2004 said the UN resolution was a historic step for human rights. “It is the first time we have had a resolution based on a responsibility to protect people,” he said. “A huge amount of care and restraint is being exercised,” he said of the campaign. “We have not had that thing that is so heartrending – and which discredits these operations – which is civilian victims.” But Zapatero, who has sent aircraft and warships to join the Libya campaign, insisted that military means should not be used to oust Gadaffi. “The use of arms is for protecting the population,” he said. “For regime change we have our political and economic strength.” Europe’s task did not end, there, he insisted. “The north of Africa and the Mediterranean as a whole are going to look towards the north. They will look to Europe, and Europe must not look away.” Wind power became Spain’s biggest energy source for the first time in March, but events in Japan have not changed Zapatero’s policy of using nuclear energy, while refusing to build extra capacity. “When nuclear power stations come to the end of their lifespan they will be closed,” he said. “We don’t propose building new power stations and must guarantee the production of alternative sources to cover the closure of every nuclear power station.” José Luis Zapatero Spain European Union European monetary union Europe Europe Giles Tremlett guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …