Delegates report ‘huge number of bodies’ from week of tribal clashes as fighting continues over disputed presidential election Rival forces in Ivory Coast are continuing their battle for power as it emerged that more than 800 people were killed this week in inter-ethnic violence in the town of Duekoue. Soldiers backing the country’s UN-recognised president, Alassane Ouattara, clashed with forces loyal to the voted-out president, Laurent Gbagbo, in the country’s main city and former capital, Abidjan. The International Committee of the Red Cross has said at least 800 people were killed in intercommunal violence in Duekoue believed to have taken place on Tuesday, the day after the town in the west of Ivory Coast was taken by the pro-Ouatarra fighters. It is not clear what prompted the killings and whether Ouattara’s forces were involved but they have blamed any killings on the retreating Gbagbo fighters. Red Cross spokeswoman Dorothea Krimitsas said delegates from the Ivorian Red Cross had visited Duekoue on Thursday and Friday to gather evidence and saw a “huge number of bodies.” “We have information that at least 800 persons were killed on 29 March in Duekoue in intercommunal violence,” Krimitsas told Reuters. “Our colleagues saw hundreds of bodies. We strongly suspect that was the result of intercommunal violence. Since Monday or so tens of thousands of people have fled the area. This is not the first time there has been intercommunal violence in Duekoue.” The head of the ICRC delegation in the country, Dominique Liengme, said in a statement: “This incident is particularly shocking in its size and brutality. “The ICRC condemns direct attacks on civilians and reminds the parties to the conflict to make sure that people in the territory under their control must be protected under all circumstances.” The ICRC said tens of thousands of women, men and children had fled fighting in Duekoue since Monday. Gunfire and the sound of heavy weapons fire rang out across Abidjan as the country’s former rebels pressed an offensive to oust Gbagbo, who is refusing to leave office. Pro-Ouatarra fighters met with resistance from Gbagbo fighters around strategic locations like the presidential palace, the state broadcaster RTI and military bases. Residents said they heard loud explosions near the Agban base, the city’s largest, in the Adjame neighbourhood near Cocody where Gbagbo has his official residence. “Mortar fire has been heard since late last night around the gendarmerie. It is very loud and we’re taking shelter in our homes,” said local resident Jules Konin. “The gendarmes from the camp are fighting the insurgents,” said another resident, Adi Saba. Ouattara was internationally recognised as president last year after the electoral commission declared him the winner of a November run-off vote. But Gbagbo also claimed victory. Sanctions have failed to dislodge Gbagbo. The four-month standoff since the election has killed nearly 500 people, according to UN figures, although the real toll is probably far higher. Around 1 million people have fled Abidjan alone and 122,000 more have crossed into Liberia, according to the UN. Ivory Coast Laurent Gbagbo David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Turn on our auto-refresh tool or hammer F5 for updates • Email rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk with your thoughts • Discuss the game on our Cricket World Cup blog Team news Sri Lanka have made four changes, including the omission of Ajantha Mendis. There was a hint that might happen, because India play him pretty well, but that is still a major shock. They have also completely changed the balance of their side, with five bowlers rather than four, and two spinners rather than three. Chamara Kapugedera replaces the out-of-form Chamara Silva at No5, Thisara Perera is in for Angelo Mathews, Nuwan Kulasekera is in for Rangana Herath, and the offspinner Suraj Randiv – who only arrived a couple of days ago as a replacement – is in for Mendis. India make just one change, with Sreesanth replacing the injured Ashish Nehra. That’s a bit of a surprise, in that the pitch is expected to turn, but there should also be an unusual a India Sehwag, Tendulkar, Gambhir, Kohli, Yuvraj, Dhoni (c/wk), Raina, Harbhajan, Zaheer Khan, Patel, Sreesanth. Sri Lanka Tharanga, Dilshan, Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Samaraweera, Kapugedera, Perera, Kulasekera, Malinga, Randiv, Muralitharan. It’s time for the toss Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Kumar Sangakkara, two devilishly cool characters who are textbook examples of modern masculinity, both look pretty relaxed. They even manage to stay completely calm when the toss goes completely wrong. The coin landed as heads, but because of the noise nobody heard Kumar Sangakkara’s call and the match referee Jeff Crowe flicked the coin again. Sangakkara got it right second time, however. Sri Lanka have won the toss and will bat first . This is the end, rubber-wristed friend Today is the final day of Muttiah Muralitharan’s astonishing career, the last we’ll see of those wild eyes, that child-like smile, and that superhuman wrist. So much has been written about him, and Mike Selvey’s piece yesterday was a cracker , and there is very little to add. As well as being one of the greatest players of all time, he has been one of the nicest men ever to play the game. The dignity he has shown in the face of 15 years of whispers and moans has been truly staggering and would be beyond at least 99.94 per cent of the population, while his simple, nerdish love of cricket remains totally infectious. The phrase is used a lot, but with Murali it is fair to say that we will never see the like again. Preamble Good morning. So, the World Cup final. After 43 days, 20,781 runs, 721 wickets, one tie, umpteen near coronaries, an innings for the ages from Ireland’s purple-haired warrior and enough man love to make world peace a tantalising possibility if only the entire globe could embrace cricket, we’ve reached the end. This might be the first World Cup final in any sport to come after the Lord Mayor’s Show, but what a prospect it is. You could not ask for a more perfect final than this. India and Sri Lanka are the two best teams and the two co-hosts; they are so evenly matched that they even have the same strengths and weakness; and they have an all-time-great sniffing the mother of all fairytales: a 100th hundred for Sachin Tendulkar, or a matchwinning performance from Muttiah Muralitharan in his final match. Murali bowling to Sachin in a Super Over? Well, Dame Fortune, if you insist… Murali is fit to play – well, he’ll play – but there is no news on how Sri Lanka will replace Angelo Mathews, who is a deceptively big loss. They have had a pretty easy route to the final, whereas India have already won two finals just to reach the final. Which is better? That bit of history will be written by the victors. Cricket World Cup 2011 India cricket team Sri Lanka cricket team Cricket Over by over reports Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I’ve been saying this for years: Why on earth do we keep handing all the profits from government-funded drugs back to the pharmaceutical companies? Why don’t we simply contract with different companies to provide them, and rotate them every five years or so? If this particular drug controversy didn’t have such a clear narrative, odds are, nothing would have happened to give affordable access back to pregnant women: The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday took the unusual step of announcing that it would allow pharmacies to continue to produce less expensive versions of a drug long used to reduce the risk that women will give birth prematurely. The move was aimed at defusing a controversy that erupted after the agency approved the drug Makena to prevent preterm births. Makena’s owner, KV Pharmaceutical of St. Louis, is charging $1,500 a dose for the drug. The same compound had been available for years for about $10 to $20 a dose. The FDA’s statement came a day after The Washington Post reported the intense criticism that has arisen over Makena. After word of Makena’s price began to spread, Internet sites for pregnant women became filled with angry commentary. Some created Facebook pages lambasting KV. The price also drew harsh criticism from several members of Congress, as well as many doctors and medical groups, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics. On Wednesday, the FDA challenged KV’s warning to specialty pharmacies that had been producing the cheaper versions of the drug that the agency would no longer permit that. “This is not correct,” FDA spokeswoman Beth Martino said in an e-mailed statement that was later posted on the agency’s Web site. Although the agency usually does not recommend patients use compounded versions of FDA-approved drugs, “in order to support access to this important drug, at this time and under this unique situation, FDA does not intend to take enforcement action against pharmacies that compound” the agent, the statement said.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Although the military’s discriminatory gay ban is still in effect, at least one sailor will be keeping his job. The Navy Administrative Separation Board Thursday recommend that 26-year-old Petty Officer Second Class Derek Morado not be fired even though he disclosed that he was gay on his MySpace page. “I’m very very relieved,” Morado said in an interview with KPMH . “That’s my initial reaction.” “My personal life will continue to be my personal life,” he told The Bay Citizen . “But now I don’t have to hide, I don’t have to struggle.” “We did it!!” GetEQUAL Director Robin McGehee declared . “With your help, Derek gets to not only save his career, but walk prouder — without the burden of discrimination on his shoulders.” “This is good news for a few reasons — it shows the power of grassroots efforts to apply pressure and the reality that, when we expose the truth and stand up for our dignity, we win. We don’t know how many other servicemembers are facing discharge, but we will not rest until all Americans — LGB and T — are free to serve their country freely, openly, honestly, and without danger of discharge,” she added. The four-hour Navy hearing happened 100 days after President Barack Obama signed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” into law. The policy remains in effect until 60 days after the president, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff all agree that the military’s ability to fight won’t be adversely affected by ending the ban. That’s expected to happen later this year. Attorney Mark King told KMPH last year that it was still perfectly legal for the Navy to continue to pursue separations for sailors who admit they are gay. “There is nothing illegal about what the Navy is trying to do,” he said. “If someone does something in January that by June is no longer a crime, there’s nothing unconstitutional about prosecuting them in September over what happened in January.” “We have to treat them all with dignity and respect,” Navy Commander Danny Hernandez said. “At the same time, there is a law and we have to maintain that law.”
Continue reading …The New York Times vs. state spending cuts, take three. After the New York State legislature passed a $132.5 billion budget under new Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo that cuts overall spending by two percent, Albany-based reporter Thomas Kaplan went looking for budget victims for Friday’s “ After an On-Time Passage of a Pared-Back Budget, Bracing for the Pain to Come .” Not once did the Times forward an elementary piece of information — the state’s $10 billion deficit. The word “deficit” did not appear in the story, although the emotionally laded word “pain” appeared three times, including in the headline. One had to look to local coverage for that basic piece of fiscal information. Instead, Kaplan went around soliciting sob stories, from school teachers, to prison guards, to NYC Mayor Bloomberg. After the State Legislature on Thursday adopted one of the leanest budgets in recent years, thousands of workers are facing the threat of layoffs, school systems across the state are preparing teacher cuts, and prison guards face losing their jobs as the state decides which prisons to close. While Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and state lawmakers hailed the passing of an on-time spending plan for the first time in five years as a sign of Albany’s behaving responsibly in tackling the state’s financial woes, the consequences of a budget that makes deep cuts in education, health care and other areas will certainly prove severe. The job cuts would be the biggest single-year decrease in the state work force in at least 15 years, the last time the state’s year-to-year spending decreased. Now that lawmakers have passed a $132.5 billion budget, the pain predicted by many advocates may soon become real. “It’s a new day in Albany,” the governor said in a video released Thursday. “Government needs to recognize the new economic reality. Government needs to tighten its belt and cut the waste.” The belt-tightening will not come without a price, according to officials around the state who were scrambling on Thursday to confront the fallout from the cuts. While the Legislature restored some of the education cuts Mr. Cuomo had proposed, many local officials said it was not enough. …. Mr. Cuomo has acknowledged the hurt that his budget would cause. (“You have to remember that every time you talk about a layoff, you’re talking about a family,” he said shortly before unveiling his budget.) But at the same time, his aides say that it is important not to ignore the wider picture.
Continue reading …If you’re wealthy and a Republican and you like your donations to be tax-deductible whenever possible, then Donors Trust, Inc. is your kind of “charity”. AlterNet touched on the edges of what they do back in October, when they focused on a large donation which funded a weird effort to distribute a DVD entitled “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West”, but they primarily focuses on the donor and projects around the DVD with Koch Industries as the primary player. Koch Industries is one player, but they’re by no means the only player, nor are they even the only primary player. What is Donors Trust? Donors Trust is a tax-deductible slush fund. If a donor or foundation wants to put money toward a project and doesn’t want it to be a direct gift reportable to the IRS, all they do is give it to Donors Trust. Donors Trust has three related project entities, according to their 2009 disclosures: Donors Trust, LLC – Created to receive a gift of real property and liquidate it Talent Market, LLC – Provides administrative support services Center for College Affordability & Productivity, LLC – Research, writing, educational services There is also Donors Capital Fund, Inc., which is the grantmaking arm and which also receives contributions as a private foundation. 2009 Donors Trust Direct-Funded and Controlled Projects The Project on Fair Representation (PFR) This would be the union-busting, voter ID, minimum wage, public school attacking project, as described in their required disclosures: The project on fair representation works to effect change in law and public policy through a combination of research, litiigation, and public education in the four areas where racial discrimination is the most entrenched: voting, education, public contracting and employment The Supply Side Project (SSP) This would be the “break the entitlements” project, as they describe this way: The Supply Side Project develops and advances fundamental market-based reform proposals for Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Welfare and Health Care. Center for Class Action Fairness (CCAF) The tort reform project: Through pro bono representation of consumers, CCAF seeks to increase net awards to members of class action lawsuits through objections to settlements producing excessive attorney fees. An additional goal is a reduction in meritless class action suits as trial attorneys’ awareness of CCAF’s watchdog role increases. Don’t be fooled by that claim about increasing net awards to members of class action suits. The real motive is the “additional goal.” Student Free Press Association (SFPA) This could also be called the “Fox News Incubator Project”. The Student Free Press Association is an organization run by veteran journalists for the benefit of beginning journalists. It identifies and supports college students seeking to improve campus journalism, explore media careers, and commit themselves to the principles of a free society. Talent Market The placement service for those whose politics align. A free talent recruitment program available to charities whose mission aligns with Donors Trust’s charitable mission The Hollywood Project Terminated in 2009, this was one of the moving parts referenced in Alternet’s piece on the Islamic-hysteria video piece timed to push McCain ahead of Obama in 2008. Alternate title: The Propanganda Project. The project aimed to advance liberty and virtue in America and globally by touching creative professionals at the fulcrum of world visual media: Hollywood. Some of Donors’ Trust’s Non-Profit Donors Since non-profits are not required to disclose individual or corporate donors, there isn’t a lot of information available on them. However, foundations are required to disclose grants to other non-profit entities, and with enough time and patience, some facts emerge. Here’s what I’ve found so far, taken from public filings of these foundations with the Internal Revenue Service. I’m certain the list isn’t exhaustive, since finding these is a somewhat intuitive process, but it will give you an idea, at least. Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation : 2009 – $1,000,000 Searle Freedom Trust: 2009 – $50,000 earmarked for startup Note: If you’re not familiar with them, Searle Freedom Trust funded “Stossel in the Classroom”, gave $1.5 million to AEI in 2009, $96,000 to Americans for Prosperity, and $100,000 to the Heartland Institute, among others. Donors Trust’s co-founder and President is Kimberly O. Dennis, who also serves as President of the Searle Freedom Trust. Jaquelin Hume Foundation : 2009 – $400,000 Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation : 2009: – $500,000 (Health Freedom Fund); $25,000 Tocqueville Program Note: The Bradley Foundation also funds the MacIver Institute in Wisconsin, primary mover and shaker behind the current union-busting initiatives there. Vanguard Endowment Trust – 2009: $250,000, earmarked for a special project I’m certain there are more, but you get the general idea from these names. Big Republican establishment players, along with the more libertarian types aligned with the Koch brothers. Where it gets more interesting is on the outgoing side. Who Donors Trust Donates To Remember my questions about American Majority ? In 2009, Donors Trust gave them $66,050. 2010 was their banner year, though, and we won’t know what they received from Donors Trust until around November, the deadline for filing 2010 disclosures. Other recipients: Americans for Prosperity Foundation received $544,000 earmarked for their Patients United project, $82,000 for the “Right OnLine” Project, and $800,000 for general operations support. Smaller grants were made to AFP for the card check project and Washington State Startup, as well as $7500 for AFPF Kansas. Energy “advocate” Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received $278,250 for their Environmental Education Fund, $398,000 for general operations, and $198,000 to hire additional staff. E Pluribus Unum Films received $8,000 for EconomicThinking.org . The John K MacIver Institute in Wisconsin received $14,500 to “experiment with achieving growth.” Also in Wisconsin, the Lucy Burns Institute received $14,350 also to experiment with achieving growth, along with about $47,000 in general operations support and $3,000 in grant administration funds. The Lucy Burns Institute’s primary purpose is to help people learn about and use state sunshine laws and open records requests. Brent Bozell’s Media Research Center received $305,000 for general operations along with $1,000 earmarked for the ” Rush Limbaugh Project (PDF) “. Mercatus Center received $403,000, of which $100,000 was earmarked for a “state outreach program”. The Pioneer Institute received $100,000 for “achieving greater reach by drawing attention to your work through online…” The Sam Adams Alliance, whose funding went from $60,000 to about $5 million in 2009 received $250,000 for general operations and $5,000 for content/portal expenses. Shimer College , a small liberal arts college, was nearly taken over by ultra-conservative authoritarian interests in 2010. They forced out their rogue president after realizing what was happening. In 2009, Donors Trust sent $585,000.00 in grants for general operations. There are 110 students at this college, so figure out what level of funding that was for such a small school. On and on it goes. There are many more organizations who received substantial gifts, including FreedomWorks, State Policy Network, Leadership Institute, Young America’s Foundation and more. At the very least, now you get a sense of who the donors are, and the circular nature of non-profit funding. They recycle the money through organizations like this — it’s almost a laundering operation, at least to the extent that it puts one degree of separation between the donor and the recipient for disclosure purposes. The next time some new policy think tank pops up out of nowhere to start touting libertarian/conservative/authoritarian think-tanky kind of ideas, bet on at least part of its funding coming through Donors Trust. It’s a slush fund and an incubator for the inundation of public policy with conservative ideas on a state-by-state basis.
Continue reading …Ed Schultz is so gungo ho for the Libyan war that he wants Obama to provide weapons to anti-Qadhafi forces — without scrutinizing who gets them. Seeing how Qadhafi's opponents in Libya could include al Qaeda and Hezbollah, according to the U.S. NATO commander, what could possibly go wrong? Here's Schultz engaging in his singular brand of bellicosity while talking to a caller on his radio show yesterday, followed by an unintentionally hilarious remark by Democratic congressman Adam Smith later in the same show ( audio ) — CALLER: I'm with you on this. I mean, I feel comfortable standing behind this administration a lot more than I did the last. And given the situation, I would think that we definitely have to have some kind of covert action going on and it shouldn't have been leaked out. But, I mean, we can't just go in there and start arming random people. We gotta know who we're arming, for one thing. But I like to think that we're trying more to disarm Qadhafi more than we actually are trying to arm people. And I would think that that would actually take some covert action or, you know, somebody on the ground … SCHULTZ: Well, why are we concerned with who gets arms? I'm just, for conversation now. … I mean, if they're going to take out Qadhafi, hell, they can't be all that bad! To his credit, Congressman Smith wasn't on board with this an hour later on Schultz's show — SCHULTZ: Do you think we should arm these freedom fighters? Do you think that we should give them a chance to defend themselves from being butchered by Qadhafi? SMITH: Well, I think we are defending them. I mean, part of the problem with the last two or three days, I know part of the problem, has been bad weather which has limited the ability of our air campaign to stop Qadhafi from … SCHULTZ: No, but they want arms, congressman … SMITH: Oh, let me get to that, let me get to that. I mean, what I'm saying is, yes, I think we should help. As far as whether that we give them arms, we gotta figure out who they are first. Smith, an infrequent Schultz guest, just got scarcer.
Continue reading …PM says alternative vote is unBritish and likely to favour extremists as Tory chairwoman is accused of ‘Goebbels-like’ lies David Cameron has stepped up his attack on the alternative vote backed by Nick Clegg, describing the system as crazy and reminding voters that his deputy once regarded the reform as a “miserable little compromise”. He did so as the yes campaign prepared today for a celebrity-backed launch and a poster campaign beginning on Monday designed to argue the voting changes will make MPs work harder by needing to win 50% of their constituency’s support. The comedian and Labour supporter Eddie Izzard and European and world championship gold medal winner Kriss Akabusi today launch the yes campaign, with the referendum five weeks away. Other celebrities to come out in favour of the yes campaign include broadcaster Jonathan Ross, actors Nick Hoult and David Schneider, and comedian Chris Addison. The yes campaign is working hard to generate a trend towards younger people supporting the campaign against a political establishment led by right-wingers. The no campaign, which in contrast still refuses to list its donors, insists it is a genuine cross-party alliance and has the support of nearly half of Labour MPs. The electoral commission will this weekend send out a massive mailshot to the electorate in an attempt to explain the alternative vote. Cameron continued to make his claim that AV is unBritish, undemocratic and likely to favour extremists. He said yesterday: “It is a system so undemocratic that your vote for a mainstream party counts once, while someone can support a fringe party like the BNP and get their vote counted several times. “It’s a system so obscure that it is only used by three countries in the whole world: Australia, Fiji and Papua New Guinea. I’m not making it up, three countries in the whole world. Our system is used by half of the world.” Cameron stopped short of repeating the claim by the Conservative chairwoman, Lady Warsi, that AV will lead to mainstream parties having to pander to rightwing extremists. Her claim prompted the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, to accuse Warsi of indulging in Goebbels-like lies, an indication that relations between the yes and no campaigns will get very bitter in the next few weeks, with potential long-term consequences for relations inside the coalition. Cameron argued that the system is so unfair the person who comes third will win. Speaking at the party’s Welsh conference, he said: “Just think forward to the Olympics. Usain Bolt powers home in the hundred metres but when it comes to handing out the gold medals they give it to the person who comes third. You wouldn’t do it in the Olympics, we shouldn’t do it in politics, we’ve got to vote no to this crazy system.” But David Mowat, Conservative MP for Warrington South, indicated he may be the first Tory to break with his party’s support for first past the post and back AV in the referendum. He told the Liverpool Daily Post: “I think the existing system tends to benefit the Labour party. If we did have AV, and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first past the post.” AV – the alternative vote David Cameron Electoral reform Eddie Izzard Sayeeda Warsi Nick Clegg Chris Huhne Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …PM says alternative vote is unBritish and likely to favour extremists as Tory chairwoman is accused of ‘Goebbels-like’ lies David Cameron has stepped up his attack on the alternative vote backed by Nick Clegg, describing the system as crazy and reminding voters that his deputy once regarded the reform as a “miserable little compromise”. He did so as the yes campaign prepared today for a celebrity-backed launch and a poster campaign beginning on Monday designed to argue the voting changes will make MPs work harder by needing to win 50% of their constituency’s support. The comedian and Labour supporter Eddie Izzard and European and world championship gold medal winner Kriss Akabusi today launch the yes campaign, with the referendum five weeks away. Other celebrities to come out in favour of the yes campaign include broadcaster Jonathan Ross, actors Nick Hoult and David Schneider, and comedian Chris Addison. The yes campaign is working hard to generate a trend towards younger people supporting the campaign against a political establishment led by right-wingers. The no campaign, which in contrast still refuses to list its donors, insists it is a genuine cross-party alliance and has the support of nearly half of Labour MPs. The electoral commission will this weekend send out a massive mailshot to the electorate in an attempt to explain the alternative vote. Cameron continued to make his claim that AV is unBritish, undemocratic and likely to favour extremists. He said yesterday: “It is a system so undemocratic that your vote for a mainstream party counts once, while someone can support a fringe party like the BNP and get their vote counted several times. “It’s a system so obscure that it is only used by three countries in the whole world: Australia, Fiji and Papua New Guinea. I’m not making it up, three countries in the whole world. Our system is used by half of the world.” Cameron stopped short of repeating the claim by the Conservative chairwoman, Lady Warsi, that AV will lead to mainstream parties having to pander to rightwing extremists. Her claim prompted the Liberal Democrat energy secretary, Chris Huhne, to accuse Warsi of indulging in Goebbels-like lies, an indication that relations between the yes and no campaigns will get very bitter in the next few weeks, with potential long-term consequences for relations inside the coalition. Cameron argued that the system is so unfair the person who comes third will win. Speaking at the party’s Welsh conference, he said: “Just think forward to the Olympics. Usain Bolt powers home in the hundred metres but when it comes to handing out the gold medals they give it to the person who comes third. You wouldn’t do it in the Olympics, we shouldn’t do it in politics, we’ve got to vote no to this crazy system.” But David Mowat, Conservative MP for Warrington South, indicated he may be the first Tory to break with his party’s support for first past the post and back AV in the referendum. He told the Liverpool Daily Post: “I think the existing system tends to benefit the Labour party. If we did have AV, and we put Lib Dems second and they put us second, it would be very likely to give us a better result than we might achieve under first past the post.” AV – the alternative vote David Cameron Electoral reform Eddie Izzard Sayeeda Warsi Nick Clegg Chris Huhne Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Is Pastor Terry Jones happy now? The controversial Florida pastor who halted plans to burn a Quran on the 9/11 anniversary last year oversaw the burning of the Islamic holy book on Sunday after it was found “guilty” during a “trial” at his church. “We had a court process,” said Pastor Terry Jones , who acted as judge, in a phone interview. “We tried to set it up as fair as possible, which you can imagine, of course, is very difficult.” Jones originally gave up the idea of a Koran burning, but I guess life got boring without some media attention following Rep. Peter King’s fearmongering hearings. Jones’s ignorant book burning took place a little over a week ago, though it was largely ignored in the American media. From the Christian Science Monitor : Jones decided to go through with the burning on March 20 after serving as judge in a “trial” of the Muslim holy book. He found it “guilty” of “training and promoting terrorist activities … death, rape, torture of people worldwide” and crimes against women and minorities. Gross — and grossly irresponsible — provocations like that always have consequences: Afghans Angry Over Florida Koran Burning Kill U.N. Staff Stirred up by a trio of angry mullahs who urged them to avenge the burning of a Koran at a Florida church, thousands of protesters overran the compound of the United Nations in this northern Afghan city, killing at least 12 people, Afghan and United Nations officials said. The dead included at least seven United Nations workers — five Nepalese guards and two Europeans, one of them a woman. None were Americans. Early reports, later denied by Afghan officials, said that at least two of the dead had been beheaded. Five Afghans were also killed. The attack was the deadliest for the United Nations in Afghanistan since 11 people were killed in 2009 , when Taliban suicide bombers invaded a guesthouse in Kabul. It also underscored the latent hostility toward the nine-year foreign presence here, even in a city long considered to be among the safest in Afghanistan — so safe that American troops no longer patrol here in any numbers. Unable to find Americans on whom to vent their anger, the mob turned instead on the next-best symbol of Western intrusion — the nearby United Nations headquarters. “Some of our colleagues were just hunted down,” said a spokesman for the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, Kieran Dwyer, confirming that the attack. In Washington, President Obama issued a statement strongly condemning the violence against United Nations workers. “Their work is essential to building a stronger Afghanistan for the benefit of all its citizens,” he said. “We stress the importance of calm and urge all parties to reject violence.” The statement made no reference to the Florida church or the burning of the Koran . Afghanistan, deeply religious and reflexively volatile, has long been one of the most reactive flashpoints to perceived insults against Islam. When a Danish cartoonist lampooned the Prophet Muhammad, four people were killed in riots in Afghanistan within days in 2006. The year before, a one-paragraph item in Newsweek alleging that guards at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had flushed a Koran down the toilet set off three days of riots that left 14 dead in Afghanistan. Friday’s episode began when three mullahs, addressing worshipers at Friday Prayer inside the Blue Mosque here, one of Afghanistan’s holiest places, urged people to take to the streets to agitate for the arrest of Terry Jones , the Florida pastor who oversaw the burning of a Koran on March 20. I’m not justifying the murder spree that just happened in Afghanistan. It’s truly unconscionable to see this type of violence carried out against innocent people and it’s unforgivable, but it didn’t happen in a vacuum. I just don’t understand why people who say they are religious of any kind in America need to engage in this type of thing. I know many of them who act out like this aren’t very stable — and in the case of Pastor Jones, a case could be made that he’s just sociopathic — but the GOP as a political party was very silent when Jones started his Koran burning 9/11 tribute, while Fox News, by Jones’ own account, was “sympathetic.” Maybe it’s time for some of their party leaders to tell them to calm down. If you’ve forgotten about the original Terry Jones story, here’s a video post by Heather giving you some context. Joan Walsh Explains to Ed Schultz How and Why the Media Dustup over Terry Jones Started Salon’s Justin Elliott writes: How (and why) the media made Terry Jones a star : When Gen. David Petraeus first spoke out against Pastor Terry Jones’ planned Quran burning in a Wall Street Journal article published Monday, the story exploded in the U.S. media, going from a sideshow to the dominant national media controversy of the week. As Yahoo News reported , it was on the front page of more than 50 newspapers Thursday — more than the total number of members of Jones’ fringe Florida church. Critics of the American media’s coverage of the Quran-burning saga are loud and plentiful, and they have a strong case. In short, the U.S. media has given a global platform to a fringe pastor with a tiny flock, elevating him to a level of significance that would make most members of Congress jealous ( whether or not he actually executes his plan). But those media critics are also missing the point. To grasp the real story here, one has to understand the context in which Petraeus decided to weigh in: At that time, the Quran burning had already been treated as a major story in the media in the Muslim world for several weeks. In other words, since at least late July, when it started to get attention in some Muslim-majority countries, the story has been doing untold damage to America’s reputation. “It was a big issue over in the Arab media before U.S. media picked it up,” Marc Lynch, director of Institute for Middle East Studies at George Washington University, told Salon in an e-mail. Digby links a piece by the UN Dispatch that shares the feelings of Una Moore, a UN aid worker in Kabul: I don’t know what to say about the horror in Afghanistan. This post at UN Dispatch from Una Moore, a UN aid worker in Kabul, says it all: Foreigners have been killed in Afghanistan before, and today’s attack was not the first fatal attack on UN staff. But it was different than previous fatal attacks. Very different. The killers were ordinary residents of a city deemed peaceful enough to be one of the first places transferred to the control of Afghan security forces. The men who broke into the UN compound, set fires and killed 8 people weren’t Taliban, or henchmen of a brutal warlord, or members of a criminal gang. They weren’t even armed when the protests began –they took weapons from the UN guards who were their first victims. Foreigners committed to assisting in the rebuilding of Afghanistan have long accepted the possibility that they might die at the hands of warring parties, but this degree of violence from ordinary citizens is not something most of us factored into our decision to work here. Tonight, the governor of Balkh province, of which Mazar-i-Sharif is the capital, is telling the international media that the men who sacked the UN compound were Taliban infiltrators. That’s rubbish. Local clerics drove around the city with megaphones yesterday, calling residents to protest the actions of a small group of attention-seeking, bigoted Americans. Then, during today’s protest, someone announced that not just one, but hundreds of Korans had been burned in America. A throng of enraged men rushed the gates of the UN compound, determined to draw blood. Had the attackers been gunmen, they would likely have been killed before they could breach the compound. I was sharing a meal with aid worker friends when I heard the news. Phones began buzzing. Security officers were demanding that my friends return to their compounds immediately. Cars had already been sent to retrieve them. Lockdown was in force. This is not the beginning of the end for the international community in Afghanistan. This is the end. Terry Jones and others will continue to pull anti-Islam stunts and opportunistic extremists here will use those actions to incite attacks against foreigners. Unless we, the internationals, want our guards to fire on unarmed protestors from now on, the day has come for us to leave Afghanistan. There is no excuse for Afghan religious extremists to kill UN aid workers because some other religious extremist in Florida decided to burn a book. On the other hand, there is no excuse for a major faction of one of the political parties in America to fan the flames of religious extremist in Florida for cheap political gain — they bear some share of the blame for this too. They created the public space for this bigotry with their stupid mosque protests and congressional hearings and there’s a price to be paid when that kind of ignorance and intolerance is given credibility by major players in our political system. Those UN workers paid that price today. Updates are still coming in, but the death toll is rising: The death toll in an attack on a U.N. compound Friday could be as high as 20 after a protest turned violent in response to a reported Quran-burning in the United States, officials said. At least two of those killed were beheaded, Reuters said. The United Nations confirmed that seven of its international employees had been killed when protesters overran the compound in northern Afghanistan… read on Did Pastor Terry Jones get the outcome he was really looking for?
Continue reading …