Carpenter who worked across Europe killed and dismembered two women in London and Rotterdam A Liverpool-born carpenter has been found guilty of murdering two former girlfriends and dumping their dismembered remains in canals in Rotterdam and London. John Sweeney, 54, who worked on construction sites across Europe, was convicted at the Old Bailey of the 1990 murder of Melissa Halstead, 33, a former model from Ohio who was living in Amsterdam, and of the murder in 2000 of Paula Fields, 31, who he had befriended in north London. Sweeney is already serving a life sentence for the attempted murder of a third girlfriend in 1994. British detectives fear there may be more victims of a man described as being “hateful, controlling [and] possessive” and “prone to outbursts of rage and murderous violence”. There are concerns for three other women: a Brazilian called Irani, a Colombian called Maria and a woman called Sue. Police believe clues could lie in “lurid and demonic” artwork and poems by Sweeney, found at his home. Sweeney is also said to have told an ex-girlfriend and a male friend that he killed two German men. The men are said to have known Halstead while she was living in the Netherlands. The body of Halstead, whose head and hands have never been found, was discovered in a canal in Rotterdam but remained unidentified for 18 years until Dutch police embarked on a cold-case review in 2008. The body parts of Fields, who moved to north London from Liverpool, were found in six holdalls in the Regent’s canal, King’s Cross, in 2001. Her head, hands and feet are still missing. The jury heard she had been a crack cocaine user leading a chaotic life and earning money as a sex worker in north London when she met Sweeney, 10 years after Halstead’s disappearance. Sweeney was arrested in March 2001. He had been on the run for six years after an attack on a nurse, Delia Balmer, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment in November 2001. Only in 2008, when Halstead’s remains were identified, could a link could be made with Fields’s murder. A search of Sweeney’s flat revealed more than 300 pieces of violent artwork and poems. Brian Altman QC, prosecuting, told the jury: “Police discovered amongst his possessions often lurid and demonic sketches and paintings, as well as pages of verse which reveal an obsessive and virulent hatred of women, and a preoccupation with dismemberment. By butchering and disposing of bodies in this way, the killer had intended that neither they should be identified, nor he should be.” Sweeney showed no sign of emotion as he was convicted. He was also found guilty of perverting the course of justice in disposing of Fields’s body. . Sentencing was put off to Tuesday after Sweeney refused to leave the cells. The judge, Mr Justice Saunders, said he was considering passing a whole-life term. Detective Chief Inspector Howard Groves, joint leader of the investigation, said after the verdict: “Melissa Halstead and Paula Fields were killed and their bodies disposed of in the most callous and undignified manner possible. “I would like to thank the families of Paula and Melissa for their patience and dignity throughout the years, and hope that these convictions will enable them to finally close a chapter in their lives knowing that justice has finally been served. “Sweeney had convinced himself that he would never be caught for these heinous crimes. However, he underestimated the resolve of officers from the Met’s specialist crime directorate, the Rotterdam cold case team, prosecutors in the UK and Holland and the witnesses from across Europe who gave evidence during the trial. As he contemplates a life behind bars, I can assure him that this investigation will continue as we seek to identify and trace other potential victims in the UK, Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe who may have suffered a similar fate to that of Melissa and Paula.” He said police were appealing for information to trace a number of women associated with Sweeney. Irani was believed to have been living or working in north London in 1996-97. Thought to have been in her mid-40s, she frequented pubs and restaurants in the Highbury and Holloway Road areas, and is believed to have worked in kitchens as a cleaner. Maria also frequented pubs and restaurants in the Holloway Road and Finsbury Park areas, in 1997-98; she is believed to have been in her late 30s at the time. During this period Sweeney was working on constructions sites under assumed names. A third woman is believed to be called Sue, from Derby or Derbyshire. Police said she would have been in her late 20s or early 30s in the late 1970s to early 80s, and living, working or frequenting the Holloway Road and Seven Sisters areas of north London. She possibly attended a nursing college while training to be a nurse, and went to Switzerland to work, police said. There was some information to suggest she was a devoted churchgoer in the north London area. The Rotterdam cold case team is also appealing for information to trace individuals who were associated with Sweeney or people who know his exact whereabouts while he visited the Netherlands and worked there regularly, between 1989 and his arrest in 2001. He is known to have links with Rotterdam and Amsterdam but may well have travelled more extensively throughout the country. Crime Netherlands Europe Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …From Scout Prime at First Draft: There is a group little known called Citizens for a Strong America (CSA) that has been putting a surprising amount of money into the WI State Supreme Court election to be held Tuesday. Some folks have been digging around and found some very interesting things on the group. I urge you to go read Cognitive Dissidence because it has a summary of that info and more on how these folks operate. Here is part: Also sharing the same address as CSA and AFP is an organization called Campaign Now. Guess what. Campaign Now’s website is also registered to John Connors. Digging a little deeper into Campaign Now’s site, one can find their contact phone number. This number happens to be the same phone number that was used by AFP to register riders on the buses to the AFP (read Koch Brothers) sponsored pilgrimage to Madison on February 15, in order to represent the Koch Industries in front of the Joint Financial Committee. Besides sharing phone numbers and addresses, these groups also share Connors, who is listed as a On-Site Production Coordinator at the AFP/Koch Brothers sponsored Tea Party held in Wisconsin Dells in 2009. Further research shows that Connors is indeed a very busy and very well-connected young man. Yes, if you read the Cognitive Dissidence post, it gets even more interesting: On top of being affiliated with AFP, CSA and Campaign Now, Connors was also an intern for then County Executive Scott Walker and for the gubernatorial candidate Scott Walker, all while balancing his school career and being a senator at Marquette University. Connors is also listed as the registrant for yet another website, this time WatchDog.org , which is ironically described as a “non-profit, non-partisan” project of the Franklin Center for Government & Public Integrity . And here’s a real shocker – Franklin Center is affiliated with – guess who- the Koch Brothers ! It should be noted that the Franklin Center is one of these so-called news organizations, a la MacIver Institute . Here is a real good summary of how messed up this stuff is getting: The decline of the statehouse beat is bad enough. What I find even worse is the influx of agenda-driven state “news” organizations, some with a leftist orientation but most of the newer entries tilted far to the right. They claim their sole reason for being is to inform the people and hold public officials accountable, filling a vacuum caused by the downsizing of the news industry. Their mission statements actually say they’re rushing to fill the gap. Don’t believe it for a moment. Do what reporters should do: Check them out, as I have done. For the most part, the people in charge of these would-be watchdog operations are political hacks out to subvert journalism in their quest to grab and keep power using whatever means they have to do so. Good luck on finding out where they get their money; the IRS disclosure forms required of organizations that claim nonprofit status are singularly uninformative. At the forefront of an effort to blur the distinction between statehouse reporting and political advocacy is the Franklin Center for Government & Public Integrity , which finances a network of websites that focus on state government. This center has ties to a number of conservative organizations, including the Americans for Prosperity Foundation , whose founder is billionaire David Koch. He is a longtime financier of right-wing causes whose shadowy political dealings were highlighted this past summer in a New Yorker article by Jane Mayer headlined “ Covert Operations .” As a side note to all of this, it should also be noted that Connors is not the only one who has their fingers in all of these pies. Claire Milbrandt , who was listed as Stage Coordinator at the AFP event, is also listed as Account Executive at Campaign Now, Account Manager at Connors and Co., and a consultant for AFP. I sure hope that the Koch Brothers are paying them well for all of their hard work. But it is very frightening to see just how many things the Koch Brothers have their dirty little hands into in Wisconsin, and none of it to the benefit of the state or its people. It also shows just how very important that we take to the polls on Tuesday, April 5, and vote to keep Wisconsin in the hands of Wisconsinites, not the Koch Brothers. Karoli adds: The right is funding many of these organizations via anonymous donor-advised funds . The Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity received a contribution of $1,400,000 in one payment in 2009 via the Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program. That was as of 2009. Wait for 2010. I’m certain there will be more.
Continue reading …India’s northern Rajasthan state is testing olive cultivation in a $3m pilot project to boost agriculture and the local economy Rajasthan, India’s popular tourist state, is famous for its sprawling palaces, historic forts, vast tracts of desert and celebrity weddings. Olives may be added to the list. The state is trying to grow the fruit on a large scale in India for the first time, in its deserts and semi-arid areas, and there are signs of success. Not only would olive cultivation introduce struggling farmers in the state’s ailing and neglected agricultural sector to a lucrative cash crop and boost the local economy. It would also satisfy the growing domestic demand for healthy olive oil in the country, which has one of the highest rates of heart disease in the world . The $3m pilot project, testing olive cultivation across seven agro-climatic regions, is in its third year and on track to deliver olives this year and next. About 112,000, saplings were brought from Israel three years ago and planted across 182 hectares. “Four farms in the north of the state, in the desert areas, have shown positive signs of flowering and olives will follow shortly. A semi-commercial yield is expected this year. We are certain it will be a success,” says Surinder Singh Shekhawat, head of the project under Rajasthan Olive Cultivation Ltd, a three-way collaboration between the state government, an Israeli firm and an Indian firm. It may come as a surprise that olives are being grown in the harsh climatic conditions of the state where temperatures swing from extreme highs to lows, especially when the olive’s native home is the mild Mediterranean. But Rajasthan’s cold spells are key to cultivation. “The olive requires a certain chilling temperature, which we have in the state. Everything else can be managed with technology,” says Shekhawat. In addition, the olive is able to withstand scorching temperatures and has a low water requirement, which is crucial in this water-scarce state. The state has taken its cue from Israel, which experiences a similar climate to Rajasthan and has been successful in producing olives in desert areas with the help of technology. As part of the joint venture, the Israeli firm Indolive Ltd is providing Rajasthan with the latest sensor and drip irrigation technology, which measures exactly how much water, nutrients and fertilisers the plants need for a healthy, high yield, avoiding water wastage. Once the pilot is a success, cultivation will be taken to hundreds of farmers in the initial stage. The technology would be replicated locally and handed to the farmer at a subsidised rate, along with training in crucial plant management. The challenge will be how to modernise the traditional farming community and encourage small farmers to come together to farm and manage olives on larger, more efficient plots. Experts say Indian agriculture is in poor shape due to low standards and practices, and has suffered from cost-saving shortcuts. But olives need great care, so management – and the state’s role – will have to be robust. Exploring crop diversification and efficient, modern farming techniques are part of the state’s plans to breathe life into the state’s agriculture. The adverse climate conditions and water scarcity means very few commercial crops grow in the state, while common crops such as wheat, mustard and maize consume large amounts of water and don’t bring big financial returns. About 30km from the state capital, Jaipur, at Bassi, 40 hectares of wasteland has been cleared to grow peppers, strawberries, pomegranates, tomatoes and cucumbers under fasttrack modern farming techniques. A high technology centre with modern nurseries and cooling chambers is planned for the area. With other northern states in India closely watching the pilot, Shekhawat believes they will quickly start replicating it once there’s concrete success, which means India could compete with the Mediterranean in the future, producing olives at a lower cost. Olive picking and pruning is a labour-intensive task and India’s labour costs are low. On top of that, the state has huge swaths of underutilised land, unlike European countries. He hopes to expand to 5,000 hectares in the next few years, with 2,500kg of oil being produced per hectare and 15 tonnes of fruits. There is potential to export table olives and high-grade flavouring olive oil for which Indians have not yet developed a palate. But most olives could be channelled for domestic consumption. Lower-grade, pomace cooking oil is increasingly being used in the country’s kitchens as heart-related diseases soar. With two years of the project left, the focus will turn to overcoming the challenges of rolling out olive production on a mass scale. If this goes to plan, India could be the new home of the olive. India Agriculture Food & drink Nishika Patel guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• A boss wants me to falsify his holiday records • How do I handle a superior who appears to be ill? At the start of each week, we publish the problems that will feature in this Saturday’s Dear Jeremy advice column in the Guardian Work supplement, so readers can offer their own advice and suggestions. We then print the best of your comments alongside Jeremy’s own insights. Here are this week’s dilemmas – what are your thoughts? Problem one: A boss wants me to falsify his holiday records I hold a junior clerical position in a large bank. Part of my job is to look after the department’s holiday and sickness records. My department manager had a disagreement with his previous boss about the number of days he should be allowed off for dealing with a domestic problem last year – the final decision meant he lost two weeks of his leave entitlement. He has now told me he wants to “get back” as many days as he can this year by not always telling his new boss (who works at a different location) when he takes leave, in the hope several days will go unnoticed. I told him I had already sent an email regarding a couple of days he had taken, but he told me to ignore those days and that he would liaise directly with his boss in future. He said I should continue keeping the internal record which we could change at the end of the year, if necessary, depending on the number of days that had been “noticed”. I felt under pressure to agree, but I now feel very awkward because if I am asked to explain why the total has changed I will have to lie. And destroying or altering the internal record at the end of the year can’t be right. Should I report him, in confidence, to HR? If there is any comeback he will surely know it was me. Problem two: How do I handle a superior who appears to be ill? I am a senior social worker and have monthly supervision with my line manager in her office, which includes guidance about complex cases. For the past year she has clearly struggled to remain alert and focused, and now I dread our meetings. During our individual sessions she becomes more and more drowsy, regardless of the time of day. The past two sessions have been particularly difficult as she appeared to drop off following a gradual process of her eyes drooping, her face dropping, and her verbal input becoming sparse. This was extremely uncomfortable. On both occasions I eventually said in a clear voice: “Excuse me, are you tired?”, and she answered “No, I’m OK” in quite an aggressive manner. I do not have the kind of relationship with her where I feel comfortable dealing with this issue myself. My colleagues have also commented that she appears very drowsy in their sessions, and we have witnessed her falling asleep on a regular basis in team meetings. I am aware that a former colleague did challenge her regarding this about six months ago, but I haven’t noticed any difference. In fact, it seems to be getting worse. Please can you advise me what to do? What are your thoughts? • For Jeremy’s and readers’ advice on a work issue, send a brief email to dear.jeremy@guardian.co.uk . Please note that he is unable to answer questions of a legal nature or reply personally Work & careers Graham Snowdon guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I’d like to know when some people are going to start going to prison over this kind of thing. FDL’s Dave Dayen had a good post up ahead of tonight’s airing of this segment — 60 Minutes Tackles Foreclosure Fraud Tonight, Exposing Unresolved Chain of Title Problems : I am definitely looking forward to tonight’s 60 Minutes special on foreclosure fraud. In it, the head of the FDIC, Sheila Bair, will call for a cleanup Superfund to cleanse the country of toxic mortgages. It sounds like 60 Minutes actually got this and reported it correctly. Lynn Szymoniak, one of the leading experts in foreclosure document fraud, is profiled in the piece. You will see forged paperwork, misidentified dates, and fabricated documents. Now, regardless of what you think of the proposed mortgage settlement, and the banksters’ counteroffer, it’s important to note that what Bair’s talking about would have to exist separate from that. Attorneys General or even federal banking regulators do not have the authority to waive claims in state courts on behalf of homeowners. So this Superfund would be a separate event. More there so go read the rest and here’s more from 60 Minutes — Mortgage paperwork mess: the next housing shock? : If there was a question about whether we’re headed for a second housing shock, that was settled last week with news that home prices have fallen a sixth consecutive month. Values are nearly back to levels of the Great Recession. One thing weighing on the economy is the huge number of foreclosed houses. Many are stuck on the market for a reason you wouldn’t expect: banks can’t find the ownership documents. Read on…
Continue reading …Ronan Kerr’s murder by suspected republican dissidents prompts Sinn Féin minister to call for information One of Sinn Féin’s most prominent figures has called on nationalists to inform on the republican dissidents who killed a police officer in Northern Ireland at the weekend. Martin McGuinness, a former chief of staff of the Provisional IRA, made the call after a security briefing in Belfast on Monday. The deputy first minister of Northern Ireland said: “I would say, and I am standing up to be counted: give the information to the police, give it to the Garda in the south if you have it, give it to the PSNI in the north. “My message is very, very simple: those who are perpetrating these acts, those who are killing our people, need to be apprehended. These are people who are pledged to destroy the peace and destroy a peace process that many of us have invested much of our adult lives in trying to bring about.” His call for nationalists to provide information about armed dissident republicans would have been unthinkable before the peace process and the political power-sharing settlement in Northern Ireland. Republicans behind the booby-trap bomb murder of Catholic police constable Ronan Kerr were the enemies of Ireland, McGuinness said, adding that the Real IRA, Óghlaigh na hÉireann (ONH) and Continuity IRA were waging a “useless war against peace”. McGuinness made his remarks after he and the first minister, Peter Robinson, met with the PSNI chief constable, Matt Bagott, about the security threat posed by the republican dissidents. Nuala Kerr, mother of the murdered police officer, has urged young Catholics not to be deterred from joining the PSNI (Police Service of Northern Ireland). The Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) is to hold a press conference in response to the murder. The officer had been a keen gaelic footballer and supported the Tyrone county team. At Tyrone’s match on Sunday players and supporters held a minute’s silence. Robinson said: “When you see, not just the statement from the GAA, the minute’s silence at their game, but also the respect in which that minute’s silence was held, it indicates we have support right across the community.” In a sign of unity he and McGuinness stood beside Bagott and the Northern Ireland justice minister, David Ford, inside Stormont. Although McGuinness urged the dissidents to abandon their armed campaign it is unlikely to be heeded in the short to medium term. The Real IRA, ONH and Continuity IRA have stepped up their violence in recent weeks and as the Guardian revealed on Monday they have perfected a new type of mortar bomb launcher which poses a greater threat against security bases and other strategic locations in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Martin McGuinness Sinn Féin Police UK security and terrorism Continuity IRA Real IRA Omagh bombing Ireland Europe Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Fukushima plant will discharge 11,500 tonnes of water into Pacific to make space for more highly contaminated liquid The operator of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant is to discharge 11,500 tonnes of contaminated water into the Pacific to make space for more highly radioactive liquid. The intentional release of water that is 100 times the legal limit is an unprecedented breach of operating standards, but it is considered necessary so workers can concentrate on containing far more severe leaks. The government justified the action as the lesser of two evils. Recent samples of contaminated seawater from the leak show radiation levels at 4,000 times the legal standard. “We didn’t have any other alternatives,” the chief cabinet secretary, Yukio Edano, told reporters. “This is a measure we had to take to secure safety.” The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric, said it would discharge 10,000 tonnes of water from its waste treatment facility and a further 1,500 tonnes that have collected in pits outside reactors No 5 and No 6. According to Kyodo News, the pumping could begin as early as Tuesday. Workers have been battling to control radiation leaks since the magnitude 9 earthquake and a devastating tsunami crippled the plant’s cooling system on 11 March, leading to a partial meltdown of the reactor. Earlier attempts to cool the reactor by hosing water from fire engines and helicopters have left pools of contaminated water and flooded basements, hampering the containment operation and efforts to restart the cooling pumps. Highly radioactive water is seeping from at least one point at reactor No 2, where a 20cm crack has been found in a concrete pit. It is thought to be leaking into an inflow conduit for seawater, but there may be other paths of contamination. Plant workers have started to dye the water a milky white colour so they can trace its route. At the weekend workers tried and failed to plug the crack by using 80kg of highly absorbent polymer (more commonly used in nappies) mixed with shredded newspaper and sawdust. A previous attempt to use concrete had a similar outcome. Edano said the situation must be stabilised as soon as possible because a long-term leak “will have a huge impact on the ocean”. As a temporary measure to ease the leak, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has recommended the construction of an undersea silt barrier. “A silt fence ensures that mud down deep doesn’t seep through,” said Hidehiko Nishiyama, Japan’s spokesman on nuclear safety. Officials say the situation is unlikely to be under control for several months. Independent analysts warn it might take years. Giant concrete pumps are being sent to the area from overseas. The government has also asked Tokyo Electric to look into the possibility of covering the plant with sheets pinned to a steel frame. But the more radioactivity that enters the air and water, the harder such countermeasures become. Tokyo Electric has said the plant will never recover and some areas are so contaminated that workers cannot get near them. “I don’t know if we can ever enter the No 3 reactor building again,” Hikaru Kuroda, the company’s chief of nuclear facility management, said on Sunday. The dire situation dominated a meeting in Vienna of signatories to the Convention on Nuclear Safety, which was supposed to prevent a repeat of the disasters at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. “I know you will agree with me that the crisis at Fukushima Daiichi has enormous implications for nuclear power and confronts all of us with a major challenge,” Yukiya Amano, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told participants. “We cannot take a ‘business as usual’ approach.” Although the nuclear threat has yet to claim a life, it has overshadowed the severe humanitarian crisis faced by survivors of the tsunami, which killed 12,157 people and has left 15,496 missing. Hundreds of thousands of people have lost their homes and millions are still affected by shortages of electricity. Japan disaster Nuclear power Japan Energy Jonathan Watts guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …In an argument which would make his ex-NPR colleagues proud, Juan Williams took to Fox News Sunday to push for tax hikes to reduce the deficit. Scolding Brit Hume, an exasperated Williams contended: “You’re going on as if, ‘you know what, we don't know in America how to help our own deficit problems.’ We do. We just have to tax people.” Moments before, in assessing Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s expected plan on how to slow budget growth, Williams insisted “tax increases should not be off the table,” chastising Ryan for, during an interview with Chris Wallace earlier on the show, rejecting a tax increase: “I don't know why it is that he somehow suggests the rich in the country have no obligation to support the country.” Of course, “the rich” already pay far more than their fair share. In the latest year for which IRS data is available, 2008, “the top 1 percent of tax returns” – those earning over $380,000 — “paid 38.0 percent of all federal individual income taxes and earned 20.0 percent of adjusted gross income,” the Tax Foundation’s Mark Robyn and Gerald Prante reported late last year . Robyn and Prante also noted: “The top 5 percent,” who made more than $159,000, “earned 34.7 percent of the nation's adjusted gross income, but paid approximately 58.7 percent of federal individual income taxes.” From the April 3 Fox News Sunday: JUAN WILLIAMS: Let me just say, tax increases should not be off the table. I don't know why it is that he somehow suggests the rich in the country have no obligation to support the country. CHRIS WALLACE: I want to talk about politics of this because the Democrats, and you can certainly already see it if not from the President, from Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer in the Senate, they think that budget politics is going to work for them, that they’re going to be able to go out in 2012 – and that's exactly what Paul Ryan said – and say look at these Republicans they're going to take away your Medicare. BRIT HUME: Throw momma from the train. WALLACE: And they’re going to take away all the goodies that you have depended on. The counter-argument from Ryan is that we're in such trouble and the country has woken up to it, that being serious about the debt is actually good politics. HUME: What the Democrats are likely to do has always worked. Always worked. The question is, in the aftermath of the 2010 election, is whether things are now different and whether the party that leads on trying to do something serious about this mammoth yawning deficit and debt that we face will win politically. I'm not sure. Look at Wisconsin where they passed this bill which will have a major effect on the budget in years to come. Labor fought it tooth and nail. Labor may end up winning a judgeship election out there to throw the judge in favor of the bill passed off the supreme court in favor of their own guy. Public opinion is mixed out there at best. Governors who have fought this issue on the budget have seen their popularity decline markedly. In some cases their popularity has recovered. But the indispensable ingredient was winning, in other words having the reforms, the proposals that cuts go into effect and benefits that flow there from become recognizable to the public. These House Republicans, they can't singlehandedly do that. All they can do is vote something and go as far as they can- WILLIAMS: -succeeded in taking taxes completely off the table. Remember, Governor Walker out there cut taxes for the rich. Remember, that there’s been extension of the Bush tax cuts. And you’re going on as if, “you know what, we don't know in America how to help our own deficit problems.” We do. We just have to tax people. HUME: Juan, what we need is not higher tax rate. What we need is higher revenue. How do you get higher revenues? You get higher revenues from an expanding economy. That's where the big money comes from. WILLIAMS: GE paying no taxes. That’s good for America? C’mon, you know that's not right. — Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …Conservative MP says media regulator ‘entirely missed the point’ of his claim that news programme misled viewers Zac Goldsmith has reacted angrily to a ruling by Ofcom after the media regulator rejected a complaint he made about a Channel 4 News interview in which the MP clashed with the programme’s presenter, Jon Snow. Goldsmith said the regulator had “entirely missed the point” of his complaint and said he was “puzzled by its workings”. Ofcom also refused to uphold his complaint about a Channel 4 news report which accused the Conservative MP for Richmond of bending the rules on how much parliamentary candidates are allowed to spend on election expenses. The regulator’s ruling had said Channel 4 gave Goldsmith “an appropriate and timely opportunity to respond to the allegations”, which were contained in a 15 July report. Goldsmith complained the broadcaster had conveyed the impression that he had refused to be interviewed by the programme. Ofcom said this was not the case. The interview between Goldsmith and Snow took place the following day, 16 July, live on Channel 4 News. Goldsmith arrived at short notice, and the extended interview became increasingly heated as Goldsmith accused Channel 4 News of misleading viewers. But Ofcom concluded in its ruling: “Given that Mr Goldsmith was able to put forward his response to all the assertions relating to his offer to contribute to the 15 July programme … the programme as broadcast was fair.” Channel 4 News said Goldsmith had spent slightly less than the £10,000 legal limit on his successful 2010 general election campaign. But an analysis of those expenses suggested he had underpaid for several items. If had paid the full price, the expenses would have come to more than £10,000, it claimed. Goldsmith said: “Despite eight months of deliberation, Ofcom has entirely missed the point of my complaint. Given some of its recent judgments, I assume I am not alone in being puzzled by its workings. What matters is that Channel 4′s allegations about my general election campaign expenditure were dismissed by the Electoral Commission.” The Channel 4 News editor, Jim Gray, said: “We have always maintained that our investigation into Mr Goldsmith’s election spending, and our dealings with him throughout have been absolutely fair and balanced – so it is pleasing to see Ofcom’s research into his complaints reach the same conclusions.” Following Ofcom’s ruling, Snow demanded an apology from Goldsmith. He used his Twitter account to say: “Ofcom find against Zac Goldsmith on every single count of his complaint again myself and C4 News. Is an apology in the post from the MP? In the 10-minute live interview in the Channel 4 News studio, Goldsmith objected to the assertion the previous day that he had chosen to give an interview about the allegations to Sky News. Goldsmith insisted he had offered to be interviewed at 5.30pm on 15 July, 90 minutes before the programme was aired. Snow said Channel 4 had been seeking a response to the accusations for a week and accused Goldsmith of “bottling it”. He said Goldsmith’s claims were: “a travesty of the truth”. Ofcom pointed out in its ruling that six minutes of the interview were spent discussing Goldsmith’s complaint about the way his offer to do an interview had been reported. “During this time, Mr Goldsmith was able to put forward his version of events running up to the 15 July broadcast. Mr Goldsmith was able to assert that Jon Snow’s version of events was untrue.” The programme’s editor, Gray, added: “When you commit to asking awkward questions you accept that your findings may provoke criticism – so we welcome Ofcom’s thorough handling of the complaints, and their vindication of our journalism. At the centre of all of this remain important questions about the clarity and enforcement of campaign spending limits.” The Electoral Commission investigated Goldsmith’s expenses and said in December that it would not be taking further action. However, it criticised his claim as “unclear in places”. It also said the practice of combining expenditure on Goldsmith’s parliamentary campaign with money spent on the local election campaign fought at the same time “was not consistent with the commission’s guidance or good practice”. •
Continue reading …