Oklahoma band reveal stage musical based on their 2002 album Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots is ‘in early stages of production’ Could the Flaming Lips’ acid trips be heading to London’s West End? The Oklahoma band have revealed plans for a psychedelic stage musical based on their 2002 album, Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots. “It’s a big deal,” singer Wayne Coyne said this week. “It’s hokey and wonderful and poignant and powerful.” “We’ve done 14 or so records, and you’re always scrambling around trying to do something different,” Coyne told Billboard. And so the band are collaborating with director Des McAnuff, co-creator of the stage version of The Who’s Tommy. “It’s really become a perfect combination of my fantastical robot-world vision and [McAnuff's] little, internal, humanistic version of what that music is,” Coyne explained. The show will integrate about 30 songs, “a big chunk” of the Lips’ discography, taken from Yoshimi as well as 1999′s The Soft Bulletin and 2006′s At War With the Mystics. “I really believe it could work,” he added, “and luckily I don’t have to do much.” While the Flaming Lips have always been unconventional, the past year has seen them announce one daft project after another: a gig at a radio telescope , an iPhone gizmo , and a collaboration with Neon Indian . Next week they release four songs on a USB drive, buried in a life-size gelatin skull. And their future plans are stranger still: a movie with Justin Timberlake , an issue of Mad magazine, flexi-discs for cereal boxes, a life-size “Gummi version” of Coyne, with a hard-drive of music at its heart. “I’d just like to release music all the time and just put it out in all kinds of weird formats rather than just collect it until we’re ready to put out [an album] every two years or so,” he said. Currently, the Yoshimi musical is “in the early stages of production”. But Coyne expects the show to start workshopping soon; before we know it, Do You Realize?? could be the talk of Broadway and the Strand. The Flaming Lips Pop and rock Indie Musicals Sean Michaels guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nobel prizewinner who founded microlending bank unable to keep post because of political vendetta, say lawyers Bangladesh’s highest court has rejected an appeal by Muhammad Yunus against his dismissal as managing director of Grameen Bank, the microlender he founded, lawyers said. Associates say the Nobel laureate’s removal is prompted by a government vendetta after he briefly considered a political career to challenge the prime minister, Sheikh Hasina. Yunus, 70, made the plea last month after the high court upheld a central bank order dismissing him from the post of managing director , saying he had overstayed in violation of bank law. The official retirement age for managing directors of commercial banks in Bangladesh is 60. “The appellate division of the supreme court has rejected Muhammad Yunus’s appeal challenging a high court order that upheld his removal as head of operations of the Grameen Bank,” one of his attorneys, Tamim Hussain Shawon, told Reuters. Attorney general Mahbubey Alam told reporters the supreme court had upheld the high court verdict and Yunus no longer had the right to be managing director. “He has lost the battle,” he said. Action against Yunus coincides with growing criticism of microlending in developing countries, including neighbouring India, with officials accusing bankers of exploiting the poor. But analysts said the dismissal would annoy the country’s friends, including the US. Yunus, winner of the 2006 Nobel peace prize, founded Grameen, which means “village” in Bengali, and has been its managing director since 2000. Lauded abroad by politicians and financiers, he has been under government attack since late last year, after a Norwegian documentary alleged the bank was dodging taxes. Yunus has denied any financial irregularities and Oslo found no evidence of misuse of funds or corruption. Muhammad Yunus Bangladesh Microfinance guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …From India’s prime minister down, the rotten state of the world’s largest democracy has been exposed for all to see Food prices become intolerable for the poor. Protests against corruption paralyse the national parliament for weeks on end. Then a series of American diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks exposes a brazenly mendacious and venal ruling class; the head of government adored by foreign business people and journalists loses his moral authority, turning into a lame duck. This sounds like Tunisia or Egypt before their uprisings, countries long deprived of representative politics and pillaged by the local agents of neoliberal capitalism. But it is India, where in recent days WikiLeaks has highlighted how national democratic institutions are no defence against the rapacity and selfishness of globalised elites. Most of the cables – being published by the Hindu , the country’s most respected newspaper in English – offer nothing new to those who haven’t drunk the “Rising India” Kool-Aid vended by business people, politicians and their journalist groupies. The evidence of economic liberalisation providing cover for a wholesale plunder of the country’s resources has been steadily mounting over recent months. The loss in particular of a staggering $39bn in the government’s sale of the telecom spectrum has alerted many Indians to the corrupt nexuses between corporate and political power. Even the western financial press, unwaveringly gung-ho about the money to be made in India, is getting restless. Early this year, the Economist asked: “Is Indian capitalism becoming oligarchic?” – a question to which the only correct response is “Hell-ooo”. Recently in the Financial Times’ Indian business dynasties have been described as “robber barons” . The intimate details about politicians revealed by WikiLeaks still leave you speechless. What can one say about the former cabinet minister, a fervent spokesman for low-caste Hindus, who demanded a large bribe from Dow Chemical Company, which is being helped by senior American officials to overcome its association with the gas leak at the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal that in 1984 killed and maimed tens of thousands of Indians? Indeed, the cables reveal US business and officials to be as embedded in India’s politics as they are in Pakistan’s. In 2008, the aide to an old courtier of the Nehru-Gandhi family showed a US diplomat two chests containing $25m in cash – money to bribe members of parliament into voting for an India-US nuclear deal , itself a prelude to massive US arms sales to India. Publicly opposed to the nuclear deal, the leaders of the Hindu nationalist BJP are at pains to reassure American diplomats of their pro-US credentials, even dissing their murderous Hindu nationalism as opportunistic, a mere “talking point” . The cables offer many such instances of the ideological deceptions practised by the purveyors of “Rising India”. Virtually all economic growth of recent years, a senior politician admits, is concentrated in the four southern states, two western states (Gujarat and Maharashtra) and “within 100km of Delhi”. But why worry? He has nieces and sisters living in the US, and “five homes to visit between DC and New York”. As for the entry of retailers like Walmart into India, oh, that “should not seriously hurt the mom and pop stores that form a BJP constituency”. Not surprisingly, the Americans have developed contempt for such representatives of the world’s largest democracy, who seem to validate Mahatma Gandhi’s extreme denunciations of parliament as a “prostitute”. Hillary Clinton gets right to the point in a cabled inquiry about Pranab Mukherjee, the finance minister widely tipped as India’s next PM: “To which industrial or business groups is Mukherjee beholden? Whom will he seek to help through his policies? Why was Mukherjee chosen for the finance portfolio over Montek Singh Ahluwalia?” – the last named is a reliably pro-US technocrat. But no one stands more diminished by the leaks than the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, one of the former employees of the World Bank and IMF who have helped make India safe for oligarchism. It has long been common knowledge in political circles that Singh removed his oil minister in 2006 for the latter’s allegedly anti-American advocacy of a gas pipeline to Iran. We now know from the cables that the then US ambassador congratulated himself for this “undeniable pro-American tilt” of the Indian government. Visiting the White House in 2008, Singh induced a nationwide cringe when he blurted out to the most disliked American president ever: “The people of India deeply love you.” (Even George Bush looked startled.) This love unblushingly speaks its name everywhere in the WikiLeaks cables; even the racketeers of Pakistani military and intelligence appear dignified when compared with the Indians stampeding to plant kisses on US behinds. Singh has presided over an ignominious surrender of national sovereignty and dignity. There are many more dramatic revelations in store from WikiLeaks and The Hindu; these are tense days and nights for many politicians, business people and journalists. They probably hope the bad news is buried by the cricket World Cup celebrations . They will also try to prove their fealty to the father of the Indian nation – last week politicians vied with each other to threaten a sensitive study of Gandhi by the American writer Joseph Lelyveld with proscription . But there is nothing more un-Gandhian than this supra-national elite’s wild cravings for power and wealth, and its indifference to suffering – a pathology of economic globalisation that Egyptians and Tunisians will soon learn elected governments don’t cure, and even help conceal. India US foreign policy WikiLeaks The US embassy cables United States Pankaj Mishra guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Japan appeals for Russian help with contaminated waste as nuclear leak raises fresh fears among fishermen and neighbouring countries The radioactivity of saltwater near the Fukushima nuclear power plant reached 7.5m times the legal limit last weekend but has since declined, the plant’s operator reported on Tuesday as Japan made a rare appeal for Russian help to cope with the contaminated waste. The Tokyo Electric Power Company insisted iodine, celsium and other radionuclides were being diluted to safe levels in the Pacific, but its inability to stem the leak has prompted concern among fishermen, seafood consumers and neighbouring countries. The data was taken from an area closer to the intake pipe of the cracked No 2 reactor than previous lower readings further out to sea. Publication was held back for several days at the insistence of nuclear safety authorities who wanted Tokyo Electric to check its numbers after an earlier botched release. The fresh figures show levels of radioactive iodine fell from 7.5m times the legal standard on Saturday to 5m times on Monday. Monitoring stations located several hundred metres off the coast also showed contamination has fallen to about 1,000 times the standard, compared with 4,000 last week. Tokyo Electric said even the large amounts would have “no immediate impact” on the environment, though the chief government spokesman, Yukio Edano, has previously warned a prolonged leak could have a huge effect on marine life. In the latest attempt to stem the radioactive flow, workers will inject ”water glass” or sodium silicate on the floor of the cracked pit. Previous efforts involving cement, highly absorbent polymer and rags have been unsuccessful. Despite colouring the water with white bath salts, engineers have yet to trace the path of contamination. In a sign of the company’s desperation, Tokyo Electric breached its own regulations on Monday by starting an intentional discharge of 11,500 thousands of less contaminated water into the Pacific to make containment space for the more highly radioactive liquid that is seeping out uncontrolled. South Korea’s embassy in Tokyo has reportedly expressed concern at the pumping of water that is 100 times the legal limit, but was unclear at the effect it would have on its own waters. ”For now, we have no clear standards to determine how much is how bad for us,” a foreign minister official was quoted as saying by the Yonhap news agency. Environmental groups warn the radioactivity could enter the ocean food chain. The Japanese industry minister, Banri Kaieda, said the discharge would not pose a major health risk, but apologised to fisherman. According to Japanese media, fish have been found with traces of iodine and celsium in neighbouring Ibaraki province. The government said it will strengthen monitoring systems and not allow a resumption of fishing until the situation is clear. Tokyo Electric said on Tuesday it would pay provisional compensation around the end of April to farmers, local residents and other people affected by the accident. The operation to stabilise the plant is likely to take months. Kaieda said the basement of reactor buildings and underground trenches have been flooded with 60,000 tons of radioactive water that will have to be pumped into alternative vessels, including waste tanks, an artificial floating island and US navy barges. Japan has requested assistance from Russia to deal with the huge and growing amount of contaminated material. Sergei Novikov, a spokesman for the Russia’s state-run Rosatom Corporation, told reporters on Monday that Japan has expressed an interest in a floating radioactive waste treatment facility. The Landysh, as the barge is named, was reportedly built with Japanese assistance. Restoring public trust is also likely to take months. Unease about reliability and transparency were fuelled by reports that the Meteorological Agency has withheld forecasts on the dispersal of radioactive substances. Although the government body provided information on wind patterns and discharges to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Japanese public was kept in the dark. The meteorologists said they did not want to create a panic with simulations and forecasts that had a low level of accuracy. After criticism in the domestic media, the agency has pledged to release future forecasts. Japan disaster Nuclear power Japan Energy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Remains of young Swindon woman last seen in 2003 have been identified using national DNA database Police have revealed a second body discovered by officers investigating the murder of Sian O’Callaghan is that of a woman from Swindon who was last seen in 2003. The remains of the young woman, found buried at a farm in Eastleach, Gloucestershire, were identified using the national DNA database. Officers have informed the woman’s mother and are expected to release the identity of the victim and appeal for information about her disappearance. She was last seen by her family after telling them she was heading to work in London. O’Callaghan’s body was found near a roadside in Oxfordshire on 24 March, five days after the 22-year-old office worker went missing. Two days later police found the remains of the second body. Detective Superintendent Steve Fulcher, from Wiltshire police, said the second body had been identified through DNA. “We have identified the victim … with a probability of approaching one in a billion. So we are confident we have identified that victim of that crime – a young woman from the Swindon area. I have informed some of her family – particularly her mother – but it’s too early at this stage to identify her publicly.” Police previously said they believed the second woman was between 23 and 30. At the opening of O’Callaghan’s inquest last week it emerged she was likely to have died from head injuries. Coroner Nicholas Gardiner, sitting at Oxford, said further examination would determine exactly how the young woman died. “I think the actual cause of death has not yet been defined but is likely to be head injuries of some description.” O’Callaghan was reported missing shortly after the Suju nightclub in Swindon. Her body was found near the Uffington White Horse. A local taxi driver, Chris Halliwell, 47, has been charged with O’Callaghan’s murder and a preliminary hearing is due to take place at Bristol crown court on Friday. Crime Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Deputy PM seeks to reassure critics of shake-up as Commons health committee urges rethink of proposals in health and social care bill The deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, promised to address “legitimate” concerns over the government’s controversial NHS reforms as MPs called for significant changes to the plans. The cross-party Commons health committee urged a rethink, with its chair, Stephen Dorrell, saying it was not a case of merely recommending “minor tweaking” of the health and social care bill. The publication of the committee report comes as Clegg and the prime minister, David Cameron, prepare to launch a “listening exercise” this week in an attempt to reassure critics of the shake-up. The Liberal Democrat leader – who faced pressure from within his party last month over key elements of the bill – said the government would listen to “legitimate” concerns about the bill, currently going through parliament, and that there could be “substantial” changes. Clegg said: “The NHS is not the government’s property. We want people to feel comfortable with the changes, which will strengthen, and not weaken, the NHS.” In a sign of nervousness in Downing Street – which fears the public backlash is jeopardising Cameron’s work in persuading the public that the NHS is safe in Tory hands – the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, will accept some of the broad principles in the health select committee report, although he will resist many of the detailed recommendations. Lansley, who met David Cameron in Downing Street on Monday, took the rare step of making a statement to MPs about the progress of a bill which has still not completed all its stages in the Commons. He said he would amend his plans during a “natural break” in the passage of the bill, which sets out reforms that would hand 60% of the NHS’s £103bn budget to new GP-led consortiums. Government sources said he was carefully studying proposals by the committee, which calls for GPs to share commissioning powers and responsibility with nurses, consultants, public health experts and patients. Clegg said he believed it was an “uncontroversial idea” to hand GPs more responsibility. He told BBC Breakfast: “It is a rather good idea to have them in the driving seat, rather than unaccountable officials who are moving money around from one side of the desk to the other. “But, yes, with responsibility must come more accountability, which is precisely why we will be looking at these concerns, and will be looking to amend the legislation to reflect that.” He added that “a number of very significant amendments and improvements” had already been made to the bill. Addressing concerns about competition, he said: “There isn’t going to be a bargain basement rush to the bottom, because there isn’t going to be competition based on price.” In comments reflecting the concern of grassroots party members, who last month voted overwhelmingly for on a ban on “cherry picking” by private companies, Clegg added: “We want to be very, very clear – we’re not going to allow cherry-picking. “We’re certainly not going to allow vital parts of the NHS, like A&E, to be suddenly open to competition.” The committee, chaired by John Major’s last health secretary, Stephen Dorrell, recommended a much bigger role for nurses, specialists and social care chiefs in deciding how services should be designed, together with tighter systems of governance and accountability. All NHS commissioners, who would be GPs under the bill’s proposals, should have a board chaired by an independent person as well as a chief executive and finance director, they recommended. The boards should be forced to meet in public, and measures put in place to ensure no conflict of interest as a result of GPs commissioning services from private firms in which they have a stake. The name “GP consortia” to represent groups buying services should be scrapped, and renamed “NHS commissioning authorities”, the report said. This would reflect an expanded role for other health professionals in commissioning, including nurses and hospital doctors. As a result of the changes put forward by the committee, health and wellbeing boards in the bill could be scrapped, the report said. The committee also called for commissioners to have a legal obligation to consult patients through HealthWatch, an organisation designed to ensure local views are taken into account. “Some of the ideas suggested by the committee are in sync with the government’s thinking on how, for example, others might be involved in the GP consortia,” one Whitehall source said. But Lansley will not accept all Dorrell’s ideas, because he believes they would put too many groups in the new GP-led consortiums. “It is wrong to assume that the health select committee is telling the secretary of state what to do,” the source said. “This is an evolutionary process.” Dorrell admitted his reworking of the bill “is not minor tweaking”. He said: “We believe it is crucial to get the reform of NHS commissioning right if the service is to confront the massive financial challenge it now faces. “Our report contains a set of practical proposals to strengthen the health and social care bill and make it better able to meet the government’s objectives. “Our proposals are designed to ensure that NHS commissioning involves all stakeholders – GPs, certainly, but also nurses, hospital doctors, and representatives of social care and local communities. “We believe this broadening of the base for commissioning is vital if we are to achieve the changes that are necessary to allow the NHS to deliver properly co-ordinated healthcare.” NHS Health Health policy Nick Clegg Andrew Lansley GPs Doctors Hélène Mulholland Polly Curtis Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Director of public prosecutions contradicts Met acting deputy commissioner’s account of legal advice given to police The director of public prosecutions has challenged the accuracy of evidence given to parliament in the phone-hacking affair by John Yates, the acting deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan police. In a detailed letter to the chairmen of two select committees, Keir Starmer QC contradicts Yates’s account of legal advice prosecutors gave to police when they first investigated the interception of voicemail messages by the News of the World in 2006. Yates has claimed repeatedly that police found only 10 or 12 victims. Evidence has now emerged that police knew of “a vast number”. He has told parliament on four occasions that he quoted the lower number because prosecutors told police they must prove not only that voicemail had been intercepted but also that it had occurred before the intended recipient had heard the message. In his written evidence Starmer listed a series of claims directly contradicting Yates’s account. He said: • Police had been advised that interception is an offence under the Computer Misuse Act, regardless of whether messages had been heard by their intended recipients. • An in-house lawyer at the Crown Prosecution Service had raised the possibility that under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act it might be necessary to show that the messages had not been heard but paperwork sent to police showed this view had been “very, very untested” and clearly “provisional”. • This early advice was then set aside when David Perry QC was appointed as prosecuting counsel – “He is clear that he did not at any stage give a definitive view that the narrow interpretation was the only possible interpretation”. • The charges that were brought against the NoW reporter, Clive Goodman, and the private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, included counts where there was no evidence whether messages had already been heard. Yates has told the House of Commons home affairs committee as well as the committee on culture, media and sport that a narrow interpretation of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act “permeated the entire investigation”. In contrast, Starmer said: “In my view the legal advice given by the CPS to the Metropolitan police on the interpretation of the relevant offences did not limit the scope and extent of the criminal investigation.” He added that he had shown a draft of his evidence to Yates, who had not identified any factual inaccuracies. Phone hacking News of the World Police Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers News International guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Test your wildlife identification skills and see how many species you can identify from a close-up of their eyes
Continue reading …Wanda, the great travel writer’s widow, is as formidable a presence in real life as she is in Newby’s books, as Sam Jordison discovers When the late, great travel writer Eric Newby was asked in a magazine article to name one thing he couldn’t travel without, he said simply “my wife”. Wanda Newby is such a commanding presence in his books that it’s easy to see why. She is tough, practical and – most importantly – absolutely hilarious. Without her, he wouldn’t have had half so much to write about. Indeed, when she stayed at home, his journeys didn’t come off. Wanda herself once said: “He cycled 700 miles across England with somebody else because I didn’t want to do it in the cold. But it didn’t work. Eric said he couldn’t write the piece without my dialogue.” In Newby’s books, Wanda is combative, constantly argumentative, but thoroughly endearing. It’s hard to convey just how marvellous she is in a few words, but you can get a flavour from the following curt note, which Newby quotes in Love and War in the Appennines , his autobiographical account of hiding out in the Italian mountains during the second world war. She sends it to Eric at a point of extreme personal stress into warn him that the Nazis are about to arrive and he must escape: “Get out! Tonight, 22.00, if not Germany tomorrow 06.00.” Naturally, when I was offered the chance to meet her I leapt at it. Wanda spoke to me in her home in Kennington one bright afternoon last month, in a room flowing over with trinkets, sculptures, and pictures gathered from the four corners of the earth, and dominated by a large glass case containing a beautiful scale model of the Moshulu , the four-masted steel barque in which Eric sailed to Australia, aged just 19. We sat and leafed through the big red book Eric had been given after appearing on This Is Your Life, back in 1978, and drank tea while Wanda reminisced over 60 years of marriage, 20 books and countless journeys. My original intention was to ask Wanda how it felt to be the star of so many books, but she didn’t much want to talk about that. In fact, I got the impression she thought it was rather a daft question. “It’s rather embarrassing,” she said. “I don’t like it. But I was there. So of course, he had to mention me.” I wasn’t about to argue with her – from reading the books, I knew I’d lose. But on the subject of arguments, she did give me the following insight into why Eric invariably let her have her way: “I kept the money. If we had a quarrel, or something, I always said I’d go home with my purse. He did listen to me quite a bit. In fact, he needed somebody to support him.” To illustrate the latter point she told me about the time Eric decided he had to go on a river trip: “He said ‘I’m going on the Mississippi’. And I said: ‘You must be mad to go on the Mississippi, it’s not an adventure. There are houses everywhere.’ Then he said: ‘What about the Volga?’ And I said: ‘Well what are you exploring there? It’s all built up, it’s in Europe. Why don’t you go on the Ganges.’ And he said: ‘That’s a marvellous idea.’ “And we went.” The result was the classic Slowly Down The Ganges . To hear Wanda tell it, you’d think taking a 1,200-mile boat trip through the heart of India was as straightforward as catching the tube from her home in Kennington to Waterloo. The reality is that the Ganges is even less conducive to comfort than the Northern Line. I asked her if this marked lack of luxury had ever troubled her. “Well, it was interesting. If something is interesting, it doesn’t matter how tough it is. I enjoyed it,” she said. “We had to sleep on the banks, and the first night I was petrified because hyenas started shrieking around our camp. But the boatman said: ‘Don’t you worry, they only eat dead things.’ And since I wasn’t dead I put up with it.” Wanda was similarly enlightening when talking about Eric’s ability to charm his way around the globe. Her husband, she said, “was a strong man”. He may have described himself as “a bloody idiot” who mainly provided entertainment by blundering in and out of trouble – but that wasn’t the whole story. Just as “a short walk” in the Hindu Kush was actually a gruelling many-hundred-mile trek, so Newby carefully understated his own ability. Even his prose – which flows as easily and naturally as a river to the sea – conceals great labour. Writing did come naturally to him, said Wanda, but only because he worked so hard at it. Even before setting out “he did a lot of preparation”, reading up on wherever he was going and planning meticulously. “He wasn’t just going for adventure. He always found what he wanted. He didn’t choose a place and just go.” He kept comprehensive notes and, on his return, would spend hours working every evening. So he may have been an idiot – but he was no fool. He was also, Wanda told me with satisfaction, “well fed.” Once again, I could see how important she must have been to the partnership. But she insisted it was she who was the lucky one: “I was very fortunate to meet someone as eccentric as Eric. I enjoyed everywhere we went because he made it so interesting.” By now, the afternoon sunlight had faded. We had more tea. “I never thought I’d end up in London,” said Wanda. She had come a long way. I knew, because I’d also read the one book she wrote, Peace and War: Growing Up in Fascist Italy. She insisted to me that it was “not very good”, but on that point at least, I would have to argue. As well as providing a funny and poignant retelling of the story in Love and War in the Apennines – and how she and Eric first met, in fascist Italy – it is a fine evocation of a lost place and time, the Slovenian countryside between the wars, a world away from that comfortable room in Kennington. It made me feel quite misty-eyed, but typically, Wanda had little time for such sentimentality. “Don’t live to be 89,” was her last word on her long eventful life. “People grow too old nowadays. I don’t recommend it.” Eric Newby Travel writing Sam Jordison guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Kenneth Minor to appeal against life sentence after victim Jeffrey Locker hired the homeless man for assisted suicide A man convicted of murdering a debt-ridden motivational speaker has been sentenced to at least 20 years in prison in a case that tested the bounds of assisted suicide. Speaking for the first time about the death of Jeffrey Locker in July 2009, Kenneth Minor said his own life had “ended” the day he accepted Locker’s offer to pay to be killed in an apparent robbery so that his family could collect millions of dollars in insurance money . “In the end, Locker is where he wanted to be,” said Minor, 38. “I’m no animal, and I ain’t got no malice in my heart. “In the end, a life is a life. And I ask your forgiveness,” he said – before yelling an expletive on hearing his 20-years-to-life sentence. He plans to appeal, citing a juror’s statement that she felt compelled to convict him on the judge’s instructions. The case was unusual for broaching the concept of assisted suicide in the context of strangers staging an apparent street crime. Locker approached Minor on a New York street to ask for help staging his death, both prosecutors and Minor had said. Minor did not testify at his trial but told his account to police when he was arrested. Locker, 52, co-authored a 1998 self-help book and gave presentations on handling workplace stress. But he was deep in financial trouble himself, partly because of an investment in a $300m (£185m) Ponzi scheme. Locker had planned his death, including researching funeral arrangements online, sending his wife an email explaining how to shield and distribute their assets “when I am gone” and buying about $14m in life insurance in his final months to add to the $4m he already had, investigators found. Minor was a homeless former computer technician with a record of drug arrests. He said he initially balked at Locker’s request but started to feel sorry for him after hearing about his money troubles. Prosecutors said Minor went beyond aiding his suicide by stabbing Locker seven times in his car in East Harlem, New York, miles from his home on Long Island. Minor was arrested a few days later after using Locker’s cash-machine card – his compensation from Locker, he claimed. “This was murder for money, not a mercy killing,” said Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance after Minor’s conviction last month. Minor said he only held a knife while Locker repeatedly lunged into it. “I’m not suggesting that what Minor did is correct or right,” his lawyer, Daniel Gotlin, told the court, but “had Locker not decided to come to Manhattan and find an underprivileged individual, a minority individual, to do his dirty work, we would not be here today.” Minor, who said he had offered to plead guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter, also said he believed race played a role in the case. But the state supreme court justice Carol Berkman said race “has nothing to do with what’s going on here”. “[Minor] was willing to participate in inflicting great pain on another human being for cash,” she said before sentencing him to a prison term midway between the minimum and maximum for his conviction. Berkman’s instructions to the jury about New York law surrounding assisted suicide are likely to focus Minor’s appeal. The state allows “causing or aiding” a suicide as a defence to certain murder charges; over Gotlin’s objections, Berkman told jurors that provision could not apply if Minor “actively” caused Locker’s death. That confused jurors about the defence, juror Olympia Moy said in a sworn statement that the defence team filed in court. “If the judge had not instructed us to consider whether Minor’s killing was ‘active’ or not, I would have voted not guilty to murder,” Moy’s statement said, adding that she contacted Gotlin to express her concerns after the verdict. Berkman believes the instructions were appropriate, and rejected a bid to overturn the verdict. “I’m sorry that a juror was shaken,” she said, but “day-after remorse by a juror is never a basis to question a verdict.” Locker’s family has been unable to collect most of the insurance money. His widow and family declined to comment through her father’s law office. Criminal cases surrounding assisted suicide have often concerned terminally ill people and the medical providers or relatives who help them end their lives. But a few other cases besides Minor’s have involved looser relationships and people who were not sick. New York United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …