Click here to view this media Former Republican presidential candidate Pat Buchanan is defending Donald Trump against charges of racial insensitivity. On a conservative radio show Thursday, Trump said that he was concerned that he wouldn’t get many African American votes given President Barack Obama’s high poll numbers with that demographic. “I have a great relationship with the blacks,” Trump said . “I’ve always had a great relationship with the blacks.” “I don’t find any malice in what he said in that statement about the black folks,” Buchanan told MSNBC host Chris Jansing Friday. “I mean, I’m a Catholic and if he said ‘I have a great relationship with the Catholics,’ I don’t think I would take great offense.” “Well, Pat, you know it’s a completely different dynamic,” journalist Karen Hunter objected. “Give me a break.” “What do you think he meant?” Buchanan asked. “It’s that thing: ‘you people,’” Hunter replied. “We’re not aliens. We’re Americans.” “Maybe you’re hearing something Donald Trump didn’t really say,” Buchanan suggested. “I think you can listen to it and it’s very clear what ‘The Donald’ had to say,” Jansing concluded.
Continue reading …Human Rights Watch say Gaddafi’s army has fired the weapons, which cause massive damage and are banned in most states Forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi have fired cluster bombs into residential areas of the besieged city of Misrata , according to witnesses. Human Rights Watch reported that four cluster bombs exploded in the city on Thursday and Friday, and two Libyan residents of Misrata told the Guardian that they suspected the munitions were being used. Cluster bombs, banned by most countries in the world, explode in midair, indiscriminately throwing out dozens of high-explosive bomblets which cause widespread damage and injuries over a large area. The submunitions often fail to explode on impact but detonate when stepped on or picked up. The claims came as the leaders of US, Britain and France committed their countries to pursue military action until Colonel Gaddafi has been removed from power. In a joint letter , Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy described the onslaught on Misrata a “medieval siege … to strangle its population into submission”. More than 100 government rockets were also fired on Misrata on Friday during a second day of heavy bombardment. Eight people were killed, according to rebels, who said government forces had reached the city’s centre. HRW condemned the use of cluster munitions, especially in residential areas. “They pose a huge risk to civilians, both during attacks, because of their indiscriminate nature, and afterward because of the still-dangerous unexploded duds scattered about,” said Steve Goose, HRW’s arms division director. It said that, based on its examination of submunition found in Misrata, the bombs originated in Spain. “The cluster munition is a Spanish-produced MAT-120 120mm mortar projectile, which opens in mid-air and releases 21 submunitions over a wide area. Upon exploding on contact with an object, each submunition disintegrates into high-velocity fragments to attack people and releases a slug of molten metal to penetrate armored vehicles,” it said in a statement. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, speaking after a meeting of Nato foreign ministers in Berlin, said she was not aware of the reports, but remarked, “I’m not surprised by anything that Colonel Gaddafi and his forces do.” She added: “That is worrying information. And it is one of the reasons the fight in Misrata is so difficult, because it’s at close quarters, it’s in amongst urban areas and it poses a lot of challenges to both Nato and to the opposition.” Mohamed, a rebel opposition spokesman in Misrata, told the Guardian by Skype that he had heard “one big explosion followed by many smaller ones. It sounds like cluster bombs”. He also reported seeing victims of what he called “candy bombs”, describing them as “something that resembles a pretty bottle. You pick it up, it explodes and kills you.” Aiman Abushahma, a doctor at a Misrata hospital, said medics were seeing people with injuries consistent with cluster bombs. “We never saw these injuries before. We need experts to assess [the weaponry],” he said. HRW said cluster bombs had fallen around 1km from the frontline in Misrata. It could not confirm whether civilians had been killed or injured by the munitions. It quoted two Misrata ambulance drivers, who said they had witnessed cluster strikes on Wednesday and Thursday. Ibrahim Abuwayfa saw an explosion in the air and “little flames” coming down at about 7pm on Wednesday. “One of the objects landed a few metres away on a residential wall and it exploded when it hit and then shrapnel flew out,” he said. Waleed Srayti said he saw a cluster munition strike at around 11am on Thursday. “I was in the streets behind the vegetable market,” he said. “A big battle was going on in Tripoli Street at the vegetable market. I heard a noise and about nine or 10 things started popping out of the sky over the market. I just saw the pops in the air. I saw white smoke coming down.” Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim denied that Libya was using cluster bombs. “We can never do this, morally, legally. We challenge them [HRW] to prove this. We know the international community is coming en masse to our country. We’re not using them.” Libya has not signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions , which bans the use, production, stockpiling and transfer of cluster munitions, and requires states to destroy stockpiles. Libya War crimes Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Human Rights Watch say Gaddafi’s army has fired the weapons, which cause massive damage and are banned in most states Forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi have fired cluster bombs into residential areas of the besieged city of Misrata , according to witnesses. Human Rights Watch reported that four cluster bombs exploded in the city on Thursday and Friday, and two Libyan residents of Misrata told the Guardian that they suspected the munitions were being used. Cluster bombs, banned by most countries in the world, explode in midair, indiscriminately throwing out dozens of high-explosive bomblets which cause widespread damage and injuries over a large area. The submunitions often fail to explode on impact but detonate when stepped on or picked up. The claims came as the leaders of US, Britain and France committed their countries to pursue military action until Colonel Gaddafi has been removed from power. In a joint letter , Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy described the onslaught on Misrata a “medieval siege … to strangle its population into submission”. More than 100 government rockets were also fired on Misrata on Friday during a second day of heavy bombardment. Eight people were killed, according to rebels, who said government forces had reached the city’s centre. HRW condemned the use of cluster munitions, especially in residential areas. “They pose a huge risk to civilians, both during attacks, because of their indiscriminate nature, and afterward because of the still-dangerous unexploded duds scattered about,” said Steve Goose, HRW’s arms division director. It said that, based on its examination of submunition found in Misrata, the bombs originated in Spain. “The cluster munition is a Spanish-produced MAT-120 120mm mortar projectile, which opens in mid-air and releases 21 submunitions over a wide area. Upon exploding on contact with an object, each submunition disintegrates into high-velocity fragments to attack people and releases a slug of molten metal to penetrate armored vehicles,” it said in a statement. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, speaking after a meeting of Nato foreign ministers in Berlin, said she was not aware of the reports, but remarked, “I’m not surprised by anything that Colonel Gaddafi and his forces do.” She added: “That is worrying information. And it is one of the reasons the fight in Misrata is so difficult, because it’s at close quarters, it’s in amongst urban areas and it poses a lot of challenges to both Nato and to the opposition.” Mohamed, a rebel opposition spokesman in Misrata, told the Guardian by Skype that he had heard “one big explosion followed by many smaller ones. It sounds like cluster bombs”. He also reported seeing victims of what he called “candy bombs”, describing them as “something that resembles a pretty bottle. You pick it up, it explodes and kills you.” Aiman Abushahma, a doctor at a Misrata hospital, said medics were seeing people with injuries consistent with cluster bombs. “We never saw these injuries before. We need experts to assess [the weaponry],” he said. HRW said cluster bombs had fallen around 1km from the frontline in Misrata. It could not confirm whether civilians had been killed or injured by the munitions. It quoted two Misrata ambulance drivers, who said they had witnessed cluster strikes on Wednesday and Thursday. Ibrahim Abuwayfa saw an explosion in the air and “little flames” coming down at about 7pm on Wednesday. “One of the objects landed a few metres away on a residential wall and it exploded when it hit and then shrapnel flew out,” he said. Waleed Srayti said he saw a cluster munition strike at around 11am on Thursday. “I was in the streets behind the vegetable market,” he said. “A big battle was going on in Tripoli Street at the vegetable market. I heard a noise and about nine or 10 things started popping out of the sky over the market. I just saw the pops in the air. I saw white smoke coming down.” Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim denied that Libya was using cluster bombs. “We can never do this, morally, legally. We challenge them [HRW] to prove this. We know the international community is coming en masse to our country. We’re not using them.” Libya has not signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions , which bans the use, production, stockpiling and transfer of cluster munitions, and requires states to destroy stockpiles. Libya War crimes Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Donald Trump’s recent surge to the front of Republican presidential primary polls has been confirmed by Public Policy Polling : Only 38% of Republican primary voters say they’re willing to support a candidate for President next year who firmly rejects the birther theory and those folks want Mitt Romney to be their nominee for President next year. With the other 62% of Republicans- 23% of whom say they are only willing to vote for a birther and 39% of whom are not sure- Donald Trump is cleaning up. And as a result Trump’s ridden the controversy about Barack Obama’s place of birth to the highest level of support we’ve found for anyone in our national GOP polling so far in 2011. Trump’s broken the perpetual gridlock we’ve found at the top of the Republican field, getting 26% to 17% for Mike Huckabee, 15% for Romney, 11% for Newt Gingrich, 8% for Sarah Palin, 5% for Ron Paul, and 4% for Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty. Among that 23% only willing to vote for a birther Trump is cleaning up even more, getting 37% to 13% for Huckabee and Palin, and 10% for Romney and Gingrich. He’s a lot weaker with the 38% who say they’re perfectly happy to vote for someone who’s dismissed the birther theory- with them Romney leads at 23%, with Huckabee at 18%, Trump at 17%, Gingrich at 10%, and Palin at only 7%. Interestingly, Politico’s Ben Smith thinks that even asking such poll questions is absurd : Who seriously thinks Republican primary voters spend much time thinking about whether birth certificate views disqualify a candidate, much less are going to vote on those purported views. It’s really a great example of the deep irrelevance of most early polling. Actually, Smith’s remark is typical of someone who lives deep inside the Beltway bubble and doesn’t get out and mix much those ordinary voters out in the heartland. Because if you talk to Tea Partying Republican voters out in the heartland, these issues are very much a big deal to them. A large percentage of these voters have harbored doubts about Obama’s citizenship for some time even if they haven’t wholly embraced the Birther theories — and as Trump legitimizes them, both the theories and Trump have gained traction with them. Of course, Trump is also gaining traction with the Tea Partiers — a majority of whom take the Birther claims quite seriously — because he embodies so many of their values in many other regards, particularly their Randian/right-wing populist fantasies about the immense innate wisdom of our captains of industry. Really, this is the Donald Galt candidacy. But the synchronicity of Trump’s Birtherism with its resurgence among Republican primary voters is not merely an accident. At first, it appeared that Trump was just trying to make the rest of the GOP field look sane and intelligent by comparison. But what’s become clear instead is that their embrace of Trump reflects their willingness to ardently embrace claims and ideas that are provably untrue as long as they undermine — or better yet, functionally delegitimize — your political opponents. Last night on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show, his “Great American Panel” (loaded up, as usual, with a preponderance of right-wingers with a token liberal/voice of sanity) was claiming that Trump’s ascension was “making liberal heads spin”, even as Hannity was asserting that “the best case” Democrats have for proving Obama’s Hawaiian birth is the independent corroboration provided by the Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements (rather than the fact that Hawaiian officials say they have his long form on record there, and have issued a short-form birth certificate attesting to this fact). It may be true that liberal heads are spinning — and for that matter, as Ben Smith indicates, so are those of the Beltway villagers and corporate conservatives, all of whom cannot conceive of the reality that, yes, the American Right really has gone insane. We’ve been saying it for awhile now, you’ll notice. Indeed, we even wrote a book about it. Too many liberals, particularly those inside the Beltway, continue to believe that they can negotiate with these people. But the reality is, you can’t even have a normal conversation with them. Eventually they’re going to go tearing off into some Obama/socialist/Marxist/Caliphate conspiracy theory or another. And you’ll be left sitting there with a gaping mouth. Trump really is proving what we’ve been saying along: the Right has gone completely over a cliff. The question now is whether they’ll take the rest of us with them.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Donald Trump’s recent surge to the front of Republican presidential primary polls has been confirmed by Public Policy Polling : Only 38% of Republican primary voters say they’re willing to support a candidate for President next year who firmly rejects the birther theory and those folks want Mitt Romney to be their nominee for President next year. With the other 62% of Republicans- 23% of whom say they are only willing to vote for a birther and 39% of whom are not sure- Donald Trump is cleaning up. And as a result Trump’s ridden the controversy about Barack Obama’s place of birth to the highest level of support we’ve found for anyone in our national GOP polling so far in 2011. Trump’s broken the perpetual gridlock we’ve found at the top of the Republican field, getting 26% to 17% for Mike Huckabee, 15% for Romney, 11% for Newt Gingrich, 8% for Sarah Palin, 5% for Ron Paul, and 4% for Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty. Among that 23% only willing to vote for a birther Trump is cleaning up even more, getting 37% to 13% for Huckabee and Palin, and 10% for Romney and Gingrich. He’s a lot weaker with the 38% who say they’re perfectly happy to vote for someone who’s dismissed the birther theory- with them Romney leads at 23%, with Huckabee at 18%, Trump at 17%, Gingrich at 10%, and Palin at only 7%. Interestingly, Politico’s Ben Smith thinks that even asking such poll questions is absurd : Who seriously thinks Republican primary voters spend much time thinking about whether birth certificate views disqualify a candidate, much less are going to vote on those purported views. It’s really a great example of the deep irrelevance of most early polling. Actually, Smith’s remark is typical of someone who lives deep inside the Beltway bubble and doesn’t get out and mix much those ordinary voters out in the heartland. Because if you talk to Tea Partying Republican voters out in the heartland, these issues are very much a big deal to them. A large percentage of these voters have harbored doubts about Obama’s citizenship for some time even if they haven’t wholly embraced the Birther theories — and as Trump legitimizes them, both the theories and Trump have gained traction with them. Of course, Trump is also gaining traction with the Tea Partiers — a majority of whom take the Birther claims quite seriously — because he embodies so many of their values in many other regards, particularly their Randian/right-wing populist fantasies about the immense innate wisdom of our captains of industry. Really, this is the Donald Galt candidacy. But the synchronicity of Trump’s Birtherism with its resurgence among Republican primary voters is not merely an accident. At first, it appeared that Trump was just trying to make the rest of the GOP field look sane and intelligent by comparison. But what’s become clear instead is that their embrace of Trump reflects their willingness to ardently embrace claims and ideas that are provably untrue as long as they undermine — or better yet, functionally delegitimize — your political opponents. Last night on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show, his “Great American Panel” (loaded up, as usual, with a preponderance of right-wingers with a token liberal/voice of sanity) was claiming that Trump’s ascension was “making liberal heads spin”, even as Hannity was asserting that “the best case” Democrats have for proving Obama’s Hawaiian birth is the independent corroboration provided by the Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements (rather than the fact that Hawaiian officials say they have his long form on record there, and have issued a short-form birth certificate attesting to this fact). It may be true that liberal heads are spinning — and for that matter, as Ben Smith indicates, so are those of the Beltway villagers and corporate conservatives, all of whom cannot conceive of the reality that, yes, the American Right really has gone insane. We’ve been saying it for awhile now, you’ll notice. Indeed, we even wrote a book about it. Too many liberals, particularly those inside the Beltway, continue to believe that they can negotiate with these people. But the reality is, you can’t even have a normal conversation with them. Eventually they’re going to go tearing off into some Obama/socialist/Marxist/Caliphate conspiracy theory or another. And you’ll be left sitting there with a gaping mouth. Trump really is proving what we’ve been saying along: the Right has gone completely over a cliff. The question now is whether they’ll take the rest of us with them.
Continue reading …Yesterday afternoon, the Bloomberg financial news service picked up on a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers showing that U.S. companies pay the sixth highest effective corporate tax rates in the world. “The tax rate for the largest U.S. companies between 2006 and 2009 was 27.7 percent, compared with a non-U.S. average of 19.5 percent, according to the study,” reporter Richard Rubin noted . “Excluding the U.S., companies based in industrialized countries had an average rate of 22.6 percent.” But when the Washington Post picked up the story, it condensed the 15-paragraph Bloomberg story to a two-sentence squib on the Economy & Business page on A17 (see screencap of print edition PDF below):
Continue reading …Syria’s protest movement is far from uniform, and divisions are becoming apparent as it gathers momentum It was an episode that at any other time in Syria’s history might have gone unnoticed. A month ago, a group of Syrian children, aged between 10 and 13, daubed anti-regime graffiti on a wall in a dusty town near the Jordan border. The security forces made some arrests. Relatives of the children protested. They were insulted and beaten. Syrians have become used to this kind of brutality during the 11-year rule of Bashar al-Assad. But amid the revolt sweeping the Arab world, the incident quickly turned explosive. “It was unintentional,” said Omar, 29, who identified himself as a family friend of the children in the original protest. “They saw on television Egypt and Tunisia and copied it.” In the month since then, protests have swirled around Syria, raising questions about the durability of the Assad regime. A rally in Deraa ended with six people being killed by security forces. The movement spread to other areas – Homs, the Damascus suburb Douma, Aleppo and Latakia in the north, Banias on the coast. Every time the security services tried to quash the protests, it merely provoked more unrest. The number of protests has increased ever since, as has the death toll, which is now estimated at more than 200. Assad has tried waving threadbare olive branches: on Thursday he offered a prisoner release and appointed a new cabinet. But on Friday security forces used teargas to prevent thousands of protesters from marching towards Damascus’s main Abbasside Square, while thousands once again took to the streets in a number of towns and cities from Deraa to Banias. “We have always felt repression and lack of dignity but felt scared to do anything. Deraa changed that,” said Mohammed, a 22-year-old student from the Damascus suburb of Madamiya where early on protests spilled out of mosques in solidarity with the “martyrs” of Deraa. So who are the forces ranged against the Syrian president and can they follow the example of Tunisia and Egypt in ridding the region of another despot? As in Egypt and Tunisia, latent anger has been simmering for years in Syria over a lack of jobs, corruption and nepotism and political repression at the hands of unaccountable security services. Over the past three years prices have shot up, adding to economic woes, while a burgeoning youth population connected to the world through television and the internet has seen life outside. “The killing of people caused something to snap,” said Mohammed. “As soon as I chanted for freedom and Deraa I felt like a human being for the first time in my life.” People like Mohammed form the majority of the protest movement – apolitical, informed, frustrated, mostly between 20 and 40 and largely male. There is much to complain about: a poor education system that fails to equip them for the job market, the nepotism and cronyism that disqualifies them from many opportunities, an inability to marry because they cannot afford a house. Women have been less visible, though this week they turned out in their hundreds to call for the release of men rounded up in Beida. “We no longer trust the president,” said one of the women, who did not want to be named. “We lack freedoms and corruption is everywhere, and the youths have demonstrated to address these issues peacefully. They [the security forces] faced them with fire.” She pointed out that her brother was summoned by the Syrian intelligence 30 years ago and has never returned home. “We do not know if he’s dead or alive,” she said. This cohort has been bolstered by a small but budding group of lawyers, artists and aid workers engaged in social activism; teaching Iraqi refugees or taking food to victims of Syria’s drought. “I have long been trying to organise protests,” said one activist and former NGO worker in Damascus, who is subject to a travel ban, one of the Assad regime’s tools of repression. “But until now people have been too scared – Egypt, Tunisia and Libya gave us inspiration whilst the killings caused anger to outweigh fear.” Activists like him have helped to organise further protests through a series of secret chatrooms online, and others such as Razan Zeitouneh and Wissam Tarif, two outspoken human rights activists who unusually go by their real names, seek to document the violence and garner media attention. In the last fortnight, members of the Damascus Declaration, a grouping of liberal and Islamist activists, have thrown their weight behind the protesters. The movement is far from uniform, and divisions are becoming apparent as it grows. Calls for toppling Assad and defacing billboards of him are on the rise, but some protesters have specific demands. In Douma, some have called for the release of political prisoners and an end to shootings, while Mohammed says he wants “freedom” but is not yet sure what that means – “If good reforms are made, that may be enough.” And it would be wrong to say the movement is rampant or widespread. It may count many tens of thousands of supporters. But Syria is a country of more than 20 million people. And there may be as many Assad loyalists as there are protesters, people who through genuine admiration or fear of the alternative support the president. Despite protesters from the Sunni majority being joined by some Kurds, Christians and reportedly Alawites from Assad’s minority sect, they and many other Sunnis fear the rise of conservative Islam if Syria’s secular state were to fall. Others look to Iraq and Lebanon as a forewarning. “We may not agree with everything, but the president has kept it safe for us,” said one Christian in Damascus’s Old City. A young female Muslim added: “He is young and understands us and is struggling against a regime he unintentionally inherited from his father.” Amid a standoff between protesters and the government, what comes next will depend on the large silent majority, including Sunni businessmen and religious figures. Almost all have the same aspirations to a life with dignity and without repression and for a chance to have more control over their lives and their country. “I changed my mind after the speech he [Assad] gave,” said Abdullah, a 30-year-old office worker who described himself as previously neutral. “I am thinking of joining the protest because I don’t think he will – or even can – make changes.” Kurds turned out to rally last week despite Assad’s move to grant citizenship to tens of thousands of stateless Kurds. But others say protesting is not the way. “Protests have not been about people changing their opinions but breaking the shackles stopping them from expressing them,” said Ahmed, a 20-year-old from the impoverished eastern region. “I feel the same but I want to study and change things peacefully.” Assad can fall back on a regime apparatus that, despite occasional reports of reluctance by army conscripts to open fire on protesters, is loyal. The family has populated the upper echelons of the military and intelligence with Alawites who fear persecution if a Sunni majority takes hold. There are also Sunni loyalists in the regime who through a system of carefully doled out benefits are discouraged from leaving Assad’s side. Each time they take to the streets, Syria’s protesters know they have a hard battle ahead with an unpredictable end. Katherine Marsh is a pseudonym for a journalist living in Damascus Syria Bashar Al-Assad Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Katherine Marsh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The April 18 edition of Newsweek trashed Republican Paul Ryan as a “scrooge” who is declaring “war” on poor Americans. The piece by Jonathan Chait ripped the Representative's budget proposal and included this cover headline: ” Why GOP Scrooge Paul Ryan Is a Fraud .” The failing publication, which was sold for $1 in 2010 , featured an equally vicious headline inside the magazine: “War on the Weak: How the GOP Came to View the Poor as Parasites and the Rich as Our Rightful Rulers.” Chait, who is a senior editor at the liberal new Republic, offered the Republican Ryan's affection for author Ayn Rand as evidence of a “war” on the parasitic poor: In 2009 Rand began popping up all over the Tea Party movement. Sales of her books skyrocketed, and signs quoting her ideas appeared constantly at rallies. Conservatives asserted that the events of the Obama administration eerily paralleled the plot of Atlas Shrugged, in which a liberal government precipitates economic collapse. One conservative making that point was Ryan . His citation of Rand was not casual. He’s a Rand nut. In the days before his star turn as America’s Accountant, Ryan once appeared at a gathering to honor her philosophy, where he announced, “The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand.” He continues to view Rand as a lodestar, requiring his staffers to digest her creepy tracts.
Continue reading …British manufacturer joins India’s high-priced car market – but can it beat other marques like Bugatti and Lamborghini? It’s a combination that might have made James Bond raise an immaculately groomed eyebrow. Aston Martin, purveyor of luxury sports cars with a dash of 007 about them, is about to enter the tangled tumult that is India’s road system. The company has unveiled plans, unthinkable just a few short years ago, to bring almost its entire range of cars, including a model that will sell for Rs200m (more than £2.7m) to a country which has more than 100,000 millionaires and infinitely more traffic jams. But if there was any surprise, it was that it’s taken them so long. India’s luxury car market is already beginning to look almost as over-crowded as a cattle fair in Rajasthan. “It’s amazing how things have changed in recent times,” says textile magnate Gautam Singhania, who is chairman of Mumbai’s newly-formed Super Car Club. “For instance, there were zero Lamborghinis in India five years ago. Today there are many.” Aston Martin seems unfazed by the fact that it is competing with hallowed brands such as Bugatti and Lamborghini in the race to grab the attention of the new-rich Indian sports car enthusiast. A representative said the company hoped to sell 30 cars during the first year, but market sources insist buyers have already picked up that many, and there is demand for at least 20 more. “A lot of people want to announce they’ve arrived, so they’re buying multiple supercars – Bugattis, Lamborghinis, Ferraris, now Aston Martins,” says Rohin Nagrani, a motoring writer who recently tried out a Vantage in Delhi. “As yet there’s no brand loyalty. But I also know of someone who has several Bentley Continentals in different colours to match his different moods. India’s flashy new rich are behaving just like Middle East sheikhs.” But there is one major roadblock. Literally. “The love affair with cars is at an all-time high, but the roads are atrocious, even in a city like Mumbai,” says Hormazd Sorabjee, of Autocar India. Only two cities in the south have passable racing tracks, though a Formula 1 facility is due to open near Delhi later this year. “As a result, these supercars end up clocking very, very little mileage,” adds Sorabjee. In Mumbai, for instance, most drivers, including the cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, who owns a red Ferrari, head for the expressway outside the city to get even a fraction of the thrill these machines are capable of providing. Adi Nazir, the owner of a Mazda MX-5, spoke of a recent scene on a Mumbai road: a Lamborghini Gallardo driven by a billionaire businessman came to a grinding halt at a particularly nasty speed bump. Despite the Lamborghini’s lifting system, the speed bump was too steep for the low-slung car to safely surmount. With the billionaire still seated inside, six burly bodyguards tumbled out of an accompanying SUV and physically lifted the supercar across the road hump. The Lamborghini took off again, trailed by bodyguards whose conditions of employment clearly require them not just to protect their hyper-rich boss from kidnappers but also his supercar from Mumbai’s roads. The proud new Indian owners of an Aston Martin, despite its higher ground clearance, will also face such problems. Since the manufacturer cannot provide James Bond-type extras, owners need to keep in mind Q’s parting advice to 007 in The World Is Not Enough: “Always have an escape plan.” Automotive industry India Maseeh Rahman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Both camps struggle to convince voters of importance of 5 May poll – in town that would have had a different MP under AV Paul Holmes surveys the celebrated crooked spire and historic market square in his former constituency of Chesterfield and shrugs. “It’s almost certain,” the former Liberal Democrat MP agrees. “But you can’t tell with voters.” The British Election Study suggests it is a certainty. Under AV, the alternative voting system subject to a referendum on 5 May, the study says this Derbyshire constituency would have been one of 43 to elect a different MP. The seat’s Labour incumbent, Toby Perkins, would have seen his perilously slim 549 majority wiped out by second and third preferences and Holmes, 54, a former Lib Dem party chairman and history teacher, would not be the ex-MP he is today. He says: “Nearly two out of three votes were against Labour last year. But Labour won. And that’s just ludicrous. The people defending first past the post [FPTP], I just don’t know how they can. It’s absolutely indefensible, excepting that turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.” History acknowledges the part Chesterfield has played in past political upsets. The Cock and Pynot inn, now a museum two miles from the town centre at Old Whittington, was where parliamentarian conspirators plotted the fall of James II in favour of William III in the 1688 Glorious Revolution. Holmes is hoping a similar zeal for change will galvanise local voters to put a cross in the yes box. To persuade them, he and other Lib Dem canvassers are pounding the constituency streets, pushing local election leaflets through 48,000 letterboxes along with literature explaining why AV is so important. But his passion appears not to have translated to the people of a town that for more than a century prospered on the sweat of coalminers and toil of engineering and was largely Labour. Now the pits are grassed over, housing and retail developments colonise old factory sites, and Chesterfield is reinventing itself with greater reliance on smaller businesses and technology. With the Lib Dems defending 38 seats to Labour’s 10 on Chesterfield council at next month’s elections, Holmes feels he can argue: “The social and economic profile is changing. It’s no longer a Labour town.” Except under FPTP. However, in the Pavements shopping centre and in the market square, questions about AV are largely met with head shakes, blank stares and apologetic responses: “No. I’ve not heard of it.” “A referendum? Really?” “We don’t keep up with the news.” Those who are aware, however, reveal that whatever message the campaigns manage to impart, decisions will be based on complex factors. There is shared disgust over MPs perceived to be more crooked than the town’s famous spire, over broken promises on tuition fees, fears for the NHS, and the leniency they feel has been shown to bankers. But how this negativity will manifest itself on 5 May is not clear. “If I don’t vote, it will be in protest,” says Darren, 45, a joiner. His daughter is at university, but his son has decided he can’t afford to go. Banks have destroyed Darren’s small business and his health, he claims. And he can’t forgive MPs over their expenses. “The way they have explained [AV], it’s like solicitors’ talk, it’s too complicated and looks as if they are hiding something. As for Clegg. Well, if he were on fire, I wouldn’t chuck a bucket of water on him. He’s reason enough to vote no.” Perkins, 40, who reclaimed the seat for Labour, opposes the change, and admits under AV he might not have won. Unlike Holmes, he hasn’t been pushing the message on doorsteps. Because Labour has no party line – Ed Miliband is for, many backbenchers are against – it is not a registered party under the Electoral Commission for or against AV, he says, “so we can’t just put the no campaign stuff in with our election leaflets”. He says that there is a “pitiful” awareness of the issue. “I’ve spoken to a hell of a lot of people in the last few weeks, and I think only five have asked me about it, one of whom was in favour, and four against.” He’s concerned some Labour voters may see Miliband in favour as well as Tony Benn, who represented Chesterfield for 17 years, and assume the Labour line is backing a yes vote. But he is hoping the “Clegg effect” may garner votes for the no camp. “There’s a real sense of anger with Clegg. Indeed when I discussed it with my father he said: ‘I really can’t make up my mind about AV. But I know if I vote no, Nick Clegg will be sad on 6 May, and that’s enough for me.’” Benn, who backs the yes campaign, says he thinks AV would not have altered Chesterfield’s result. “The Labour vote recovered and the Lib Dem vote declined, and I don’t think AV would have made any difference,” he says.But he is not convinced the pro-AV campaign has done enough. “With the Conservatives against it and a lot of Labour people against, and the general sense of cynicism about politics, I think it is not all that certain it will go through. And I don’t know to what extent people understand it.” Perkins is also hopeful that older voters, those most likely to turn out, are more likely to vote no – such as John Walker, 80, a former engineering worker, who, after studying the arguments in detail, has concludes: “Australia and Fiji don’t seem too happy with it, and I can’t see a good reason to change.” But some are wavering. “It’s a bit clearer now,” said former bakery worker Lily Wightman, 64, after AV was explained. “Yes,” said her friend Kathleen Starbuck, 62, a former canteen worker at Chesterfield transport, “perhaps it is a bit fairer.” Wightman adds: “I used to like that Nick Clegg – before he went over. But I don’t think I’d let that cloud my judgment.” Benn, who supports the Yes campaign, believes AV would not have altered Chesterfield’s result. “The Labour vote recovered and the Lib Dem vote declined, and I don’t think AV would have made any difference,” he said. He is also not convinced the Yes campaign has done enough to win. “With the Conservatives against it and a lot of Labour people against, and the general sense of cynicism about politics, I think it is not all that certain it will go through,” he said. “And I don’t know to what extent people understand it”. ends AV referendum Alternative vote Electoral reform Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …