From an exclusive entry in Adrian Mole’s diary to a Bollywood-style film, the Observer commissioned eight of Britain’s most original creative talents to mark the royal nuptials in their own original style. And here’s what they created…
Continue reading …Mumsnet poll show parliamentarians lament late nights spent voting on legislation and say the system is still not family friendly Nearly one in three MPs say they have considered quitting because of the pressure on their families caused by long working hours. Politicians complain that late-night votes and the strain of splitting their lives between constituencies and London places them under strain. Despite efforts in recent years to reform House of Commons practices, a survey by the website Mumsnet shows nearly two thirds of MPs believe their jobs have had a negative impact on their family lives. More than 90% of the 101 MPs surveyed said that parliament was not family friendly – a figure indicating that steps such as the opening of a creche for the children of MPs and staff have not succeeded in rectifying the Commons work/life balance. MPs regularly have to stay for late night sittings that go beyond 10pm. And last year a Cardiff Liberal Democrat MP complained it was “crazy” that she had to leave her baby with colleagues during votes in the House of Commons. Jenny Willott said she handed her 18-week-old son Toby “to the nearest MP” to comply with rules that allows only MPs into the division lobbies where votes are cast. The complaints are not new. A number of former MPs have cited the lack of time they are allowed to spend with their loved ones as a reason for their eventual abandonment of a life in parliamentary politics.One veteran MP said: “I never saw my children grow up and I’ll regret that for the rest of my life.” Another MP added: “I am newly elected and cannot see how I can keep this up for the next four years without damaging my family relationships.” Almost half of those MPs asked said they wanted to end late night voting. John Woodcock, the Labour MP for Barrow and Furness, said he had never considered giving up parliament but had grown concerned since being elected in May about the effect of the working practices at the Commons into MPs’ lives at home. Woodcock, Labour’s transport spokesman, who has a two-year-old daughter, Maisie, said: “It is a huge privilege to do the job and I’m working flat out at it. But it inevitably puts a strain on the family to live in two places through the week, spending half the week in the constituency and half the week in London.”Speaking to colleagues, on top of that, the hours of the House of Commons for many people are not geared up to ease family existence for those who have their family in London during the week. Late night votes and meetings leaves them tired at the weekend and that has an effect on life at home.” ” Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, said she had long-contended that reforms were urgently necessary to make parliament more effective. “It is important that we allow MPs family lives because so much policy is centred around family,” she said. “I have for a long time said that MPs should be able to travel back from their constituencies on a Monday and start work earlier on a Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday so they can finish earlier on those days. I think that would make parliament a more family friendly and actually a more effective place.” Despite the concerns, 85% MPs have roundly rejected the idea of parliamentarians having job shares, an idea proposed by the newly elected Green MP Caroline Lucas. Commenting on the survey findings, CEO and co-founder of Mumsnet, Justine Roberts, said: “Making a country or workplace family friendly relies on all of us helping to change the culture around us. If politicians want the country to be more family friendly they need to lead by example, and at the moment parliament falls far short of this. If we want legislation that reflects the needs of families, it seems fair we allow MPs to live as families.The country could waste a lot of talent if we give in to the viewpoint that parliament is no place for a parent with young kids.” House of Commons Daniel Boffey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Poppy Project needs £450,000 of charity aid to survive. Without it, countless victims of abuse will be left to cope alone Mansa, a 33-year-old Ghanaian woman who days ago was close to being deported, has no doubt that the Poppy Project saved her life. “I was ready to kill myself if I had gone,” she said. “I didn’t know what else I would do.” Hundreds of other victims of sex trafficking in Britain may not be so lucky. Shortly after midday last Monday, an email confirmed that ministers were withdrawing funding from the charity, which pioneered specialist services for victims of sex trafficking, and is the biggest and most established organisation of its kind. The government decision immediately prompted a campaign by luminaries such as Professor Liz Kelly, the chair of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, and urgent appeals for donations to help the project continue supporting victims of trafficking. The withdrawal of funding means that the charity requires £450,000 in donations by the end of June to continue. The impact of the funding cut on trafficking victims – an issue that David Cameron says is a “key priority” – is potentially catastrophic, according to the organisation’s case workers. Abigail Stepnitz, the national co-ordinator for the Poppy Project Eaves charity, said that the decision was “politically motivated”. “The government doesn’t like someone who will rock the boat. We were a problem for them in that sense,” she said. Since the charity joined an oversight board two years ago, assessing the government’s compliance on tackling trafficking, it has successfully appealed 17 UK Border Agency decisions on identification of trafficking victims and forced countless reassessments. Last week’s decision has also crystallised concerns that the coalition government does not regard sex trafficking as a priority – regardless of Cameron’s pledges. Stepnitz points to letters from officials, which concede that, while the rape experienced by victims is “unfortunate”, it does not qualify them for government help. Her all-female team of 16 support workers provides around-the-clock support and accommodation for those women who are trafficked to Britain and forced into prostitution or servitude. More than 700 have received help since the organisation was founded in 2003. The organisation’s virtues were underlined by the rescue of Mansa, days before news of the funding decision. In 2003, the Ghanaian had been taken from Heathrow airport to a rural house where she was held and “tortured and sexually abused” over four years. Faced with her deportation, the Poppy Project argued that, after eight years in the UK and with an abusive family in Ghana, she would be better to receive continuing support at its Sheffield office. On the morning of her scheduled deportation flight from London on 1
Continue reading …World’s largest commodities broker rejects claims in leaked review of Zambia operation’s accounts A UK subsidiary of the world’s largest commodities broker helped one of its African mining operations avoid paying tens of millions of pounds in tax, according to charities who have analysed a leaked review of its accounts. The findings of a draft report into internal controls at Zambia’s Mopani Copper Mines plc have been categorically rejected by its owner, Glencore, the giant fuel, metals and cereals trader based in the Swiss tax haven of Zug. The report, seen by the Observer, was carried out in 2009 by a Norwegian subsidiary of Grant Thornton, one of the world’s largest accountancy firms, at the request of the previous Zambian government. Its authors alleged the mine’s owners “resisted the pilot audit at every stage”, a claim denied by a spokesman for Glencore, which owns a 73% stake in Mopani through a company based in the British Virgin Islands, another tax haven. The report claimed there had been an “unexplainable” increase in Mopani’s costs between 2006 and 2008 that allowed it to minimise its stated profits and lower its tax bill. “We suggest the ZRA [Zambian Revenue Authority] does a new tax assessment based on the results of the audit,” the report claims. Glencore, which is preparing a £37bn listing on the London stock market, the capital’s biggest ever flotation, said the auditors had failed to factor in rising fuel and labour costs over the period. The audit also suggested Mopani sold copper at artificially low prices to Glencore in Switzerland under a deal struck with the firm’s UK subsidiary in 2000. The metal was then sold on, allowing Glencore to take advantage of Switzerland’s ultra-low tax regime. There are claims that the transactions breach international rules ensuring there has to be an arm’s-length principle when it comes to sales between related parties. Glencore said all transactions were conducted at an arm’s-length basis and at internationally agreed prices. When asked by the Observer for a response to Glencore’s criticisms of the draft report, Grant Thornton International declined on the grounds of client confidentiality. But charities said the report suggested Glencore had questions to answer. “Based on the Grant Thornton analysis, we estimate that the company’s practices potentially cost the Zambian government up to £76m a year in lost corporation tax,” said Anna Thomas, head of tax policy at ActionAid. She pointed out the amount was significantly more than the £59m the UK government gives Zambia each year in aid. The claims have surfaced as Glencore prepares for a listing that will make multimillionaires of the firm’s 485 partners. City analysts were astonished to learn the extent to which the company dominates the commodity markets in documents published ahead of the listing. Glencore revealed it controlled 60% of the traded zinc market and 50% of copper. Development charities have contrasted the impending wealth of the company’s management with the poverty of Zambians, around two thirds of whom live below the recognised poverty line, according to the United Nations. The leaking of the report is potentially embarrassing for European governments. Mopani received a €48m development loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB) to help bring prosperity to Zambia. But the report states: “The pilot audit has shown there is a high need for a determined effort at collecting the taxes that are assessed under the laws implemented by the Zambian government.” The EIB has informed OLAF (the European anti-fraud office) of the report’s allegations and launched an investigation. Emmanuel Mutati, CEO of Mopani, has described the audit as “flawed and incomplete” saying it did not include a series of third-party transactions that would affect its accounts. “We have also been audited by independent auditors annually,” Mutati said. “Every year the independent auditors’ report has given Mopani a clean bill of health.” The UK government recently called for new measures to ensure that the poorest people in Africa benefited from mining. Glencore was founded by Marc Rich, the controversial oil trader who was accused of tax evasion by American authorities but was pardoned by President Clinton on his last day in office. The company, which last year had a turnover of $145bn, is no longer connected to Rich. The Zambian government has declined to investigate Mopani’s tax affairs despite calls from development charities. “We are disappointed with the government’s lukewarm reaction,” said Savior Mwambwa, executive director of the Centre for Trade Policy and Development, Zambia. “They need to take action and change the whole taxation system.” Mining Zambia Jamie Doward guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Oscar-winning actor Cage taken into custody in New Orleans after allegedly grabbing his wife and damaging parked cars Actor Nicolas Cage has been arrested on suspicion of domestic abuse after an allegedly drunken altercation with his wife. The Oscar-winning actor was taken into custody in New Orleans on Friday after he was said to have grabbed his wife, Alice Kim, and damaged parked cars during an argument about where they were staying in the city. Cage, 47, was booked on suspicion of domestic-abuse battery, disturbing the peace and public drunkenness, said New Orleans police spokesman Gary Floyd. “[They] were standing in front of a residence that he insisted was the property the couple was renting,” said Floyd. “She disagreed and Cage grabbed her by the upper arm and pulled her to what he believed was the correct address.” He is then alleged to have begun striking cars. “An officer… observed that Cage was heavily intoxicated.” There were no visible injuries to Cage’s wife and the actor was later released on bail. Nicolas Cage Domestic violence United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Anthony Weiner appearing on this Friday’s Washington Journal was asked to respond to the Republicans who apparently got a bad case of the vapors and had to be carried to their fainting couches to recover after President Obama gave his speech on the budget this week . Here are some excerpts host Susan Swain read from this article at the Washington Post — Obama address was surprise attack, GOP lawmakers say : “Yes,” the tenor of the speech was surprising, said Erskine Bowles, who headed Obama’s fiscal commission and is working with a bipartisan group of six senators to develop a compromise plan to rein in borrowing. Camp said he received a call from fiscal commission co-chairman Alan Simpson, who was also in the audience and was “concerned about the partisan nature of the event and how unnecessary and unproductive and unhelpful it would be.” Still, Republicans said, did Obama have to attack the men to their faces? “Reagan had the decency to insult his enemies when he was out of town,” grumbled one GOP aide. Here’s a rough transcript of Weiner’s response: WEINER: Boy oh boy. Have these Republicans been listening to themselves over the past three years? Have they been listening to the tone that they have used against the president when having this debate? I’ve got to tell you something. I was watching that speech, and I was the opposite. I was thinking “Boy the president’s being so gentle and modest.” I mean, you know what I would have said. I would have said the Republican plan stinks and I will chew my right arm off before I sign any part of it. The fact is, this is a competition of ideas. And now my Republican friends, they have the audacity to say what common sense, what a fifth grade math student can tell, which is they’re idea is a terrible abdication of our responsibilities as Americans. Their math doesn’t add up. And if you go back and take a look at the speech, it was remarkably gentle. The president said, look we have two different views. Did my Republican friends think they were going to be invited there to so we’d say “Oh we love the Ryan” plan that eliminates Medicare? Oh this is a terrific idea to give tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires and drive up the debt even more? Of course not. You know we have an expression, you know, if it’s too hot, stay out of the kitchen. If you don’t want to have your program criticized by the President of the United States I say two things. One, don’t make dumb proposals. And two, maybe you should think a little bit about the tone in this town when they’ve been eviscerating the president for everything from being a Socialist, a Communist and not even being born in this country. I thought the president’s tone was remarkably measured considering the attacks that he’s on every day. I mean President Weiner certainly wouldn’t have been that measured.
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: OCWeeklyBlog This is the image e-mailed to her friends by Orange County Republican committeewoman and Tea Party activist Marilyn Davenport Republicans seem to have a really, really narrow idea of what constitutes racism — which is how they’re able to claim that the Tea Parties aren’t riddled with racism throughout. But then little stories like this one from Orange County keep bubbling up to the surface of their fetid little Tea Party cesspool: The Weekly has obtained a copy of an email sent to fellow conservatives this week by Marilyn Davenport, a Southern California Tea Party activist and member of the central committee of the Orange County Republican Party. Under the words, “Now you know why no birth certificate,” there’s an Obama family portrait showing them as apes. As always, the “sweet little old lady” who sent the mail had no idea that anyone might possibly construe the mail as racist, even though comparing black people to various kinds of apes has always been a stock feature of racist denigration in America. Why, some of her best friends are black! Reached by telephone and asked if she thought the email was appropriate, Davenport said, “Oh, come on! Everybody who knows me knows that I am not a racist. It was a joke. I have friends who are black. Besides, I only sent it to a few people–mostly people I didn’t think would be upset by it.” The image did upset several local Republicans. “It’s unbelievable,” one high-ranking OC GOP official told me. “It’s much more racist than the watermelon email. I can’t believe it was sent out. I’m not an Obama fan but how stupid do you have to be to do this?” Another GOP official, who also asked not to be identified, said that Davenport is “a really, really sweet old lady so I am surprised to hear about this.” Scott Baugh, chairman of the OC Republican Party, told Davenport that the email was tasteless, Davenport–a Fullerton-based political activist–admitted to me during the telephone interview. “You’re not going to make a big deal about this are you?” she asked me. “It’s just an Internet joke.” But Baugh believes the email is a big deal. “When I saw that email today I thought it was despicable,” Baugh said. “It is dripping with racism and it does not promote the type of message Orange County Republicans want to deliver to the public. I think she should consider stepping down as an elected official.” And just remember: There’s nothing, NOTHING racist about those Tea Partiers, either. Just another isolated incident. Move along, please. [H/t Tom Sullivan]
Continue reading …Like most liberal media members, Bill Maher thinks violent political rhetoric only comes from Republicans. Proving this once again, HBO's “Real Time” host on Friday disputed former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele's claim that Democrats used such hostile talk against Republicans during the recent budget battle (video follows with transcript and commentary): BILL MAHER, HOST: Tell me what’s worse than that, because in a world full of lies, I feel this man [Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.)] stands alone. I mean, and for that statement to come from his press secretary, “His remark was not intended to be a factual statement,” it includes a percent. I mean, it's one thing if you’re, “This is my opinion,” but there was an actual number in there. 90 percent as opposed to three. ED SCHULTZ: What he was trying to do there, he was trying to sell the American people to be against Planned Parenthood. Okay. MICHAEL STEELE: Right. SCHULTZ: So this is the United States senator, one of a 100, on the floor of the Senate, throwing out a falsehood and then admitting to the American people, “Well, you know, I really wasn't too high on the facts. Just throwing it out.” STEELE: And you're shocked by that because? SCHULTZ: Well, I’ll tell you, this is what it’s come to? STEELE: But you've seen over the past couple of weeks in the whole lead-up to the vote this week, you know, hyperbolic statements on both sides from… MAHER: Really? SCHULTZ: What compares to that? MAHER: Really? What, thank you. STEELE: From, from, you know, “Republicans want, you know, to kill old people and put them out of their homes.” MAHER: Who said that? STEELE: A number of members of Congress. MAHER: They said they wanted to kill old people? STEELE: Yes. No, wait a minute. MAHER: Wait a second. That's the exact phrase they used? STEELE: Yes. You can go back. Go back, go back. MAHER: I’m just asking. STEELE: Go back. Go back. Yes. Hold on. MAHER: They want to kill old people? STEELE: Go back, go back to the congressman from Florida who made the exact same statement… MAHER: Alan Grayson, get sick and die. But you… SCHULTZ: You said this week, Michael. You said this week. STEELE: I said leading up to this week. SCHULTZ: Okay, okay. STEELE: Listen to what I say. Too bad Steele couldn't think of anything more recent like Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) saying Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) budget was “a death trap for some seniors.” Or Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) saying that freshmen House Republicans came to Washington to kill women. Or Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) saying shutting down the government is “the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians.” Or Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Mary.) saying , “This entire debate has involved throwing women and children under the bus.” Frankly, all four of these comments were far more inflammatory and offensive than what Kyl said concerning abortions and Planned Parenthood, but Maher either has never heard them or was lying. Better yet, Maher himself said on NBC's “Tonight Show” shortly after the shootings in Tuscon, “The right-wing loves, the go-to rhetoric for them is, 'Wouldn't it be fun to kill the people we disagree with?'” This came moments before he ironically said, “Left-wingers don't talk that way.” You really can't make this stuff up. On the other hand, no matter how many examples you might present to Maher, he wouldn't hear them, for like most liberals, he's got a Democrat violent rhetoric filter that only allows hateful comments by conservatives to come through. You think you have to buy such a device, or are they passed out for free by the DNC to all media members that want them?
Continue reading …Like most liberal media members, Bill Maher thinks violent political rhetoric only comes from Republicans. Proving this once again, HBO's “Real Time” host on Friday disputed former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele's claim that Democrats used such hostile talk against Republicans during the recent budget battle (video follows with transcript and commentary): BILL MAHER, HOST: Tell me what’s worse than that, because in a world full of lies, I feel this man [Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.)] stands alone. I mean, and for that statement to come from his press secretary, “His remark was not intended to be a factual statement,” it includes a percent. I mean, it's one thing if you’re, “This is my opinion,” but there was an actual number in there. 90 percent as opposed to three. ED SCHULTZ: What he was trying to do there, he was trying to sell the American people to be against Planned Parenthood. Okay. MICHAEL STEELE: Right. SCHULTZ: So this is the United States senator, one of a 100, on the floor of the Senate, throwing out a falsehood and then admitting to the American people, “Well, you know, I really wasn't too high on the facts. Just throwing it out.” STEELE: And you're shocked by that because? SCHULTZ: Well, I’ll tell you, this is what it’s come to? STEELE: But you've seen over the past couple of weeks in the whole lead-up to the vote this week, you know, hyperbolic statements on both sides from… MAHER: Really? SCHULTZ: What compares to that? MAHER: Really? What, thank you. STEELE: From, from, you know, “Republicans want, you know, to kill old people and put them out of their homes.” MAHER: Who said that? STEELE: A number of members of Congress. MAHER: They said they wanted to kill old people? STEELE: Yes. No, wait a minute. MAHER: Wait a second. That's the exact phrase they used? STEELE: Yes. You can go back. Go back, go back. MAHER: I’m just asking. STEELE: Go back. Go back. Yes. Hold on. MAHER: They want to kill old people? STEELE: Go back, go back to the congressman from Florida who made the exact same statement… MAHER: Alan Grayson, get sick and die. But you… SCHULTZ: You said this week, Michael. You said this week. STEELE: I said leading up to this week. SCHULTZ: Okay, okay. STEELE: Listen to what I say. Too bad Steele couldn't think of anything more recent like Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) saying Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) budget was “a death trap for some seniors.” Or Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) saying that freshmen House Republicans came to Washington to kill women. Or Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) saying shutting down the government is “the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians.” Or Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Mary.) saying , “This entire debate has involved throwing women and children under the bus.” Frankly, all four of these comments were far more inflammatory and offensive than what Kyl said concerning abortions and Planned Parenthood, but Maher either has never heard them or was lying. Better yet, Maher himself said on NBC's “Tonight Show” shortly after the shootings in Tuscon, “The right-wing loves, the go-to rhetoric for them is, 'Wouldn't it be fun to kill the people we disagree with?'” This came moments before he ironically said, “Left-wingers don't talk that way.” You really can't make this stuff up. On the other hand, no matter how many examples you might present to Maher, he wouldn't hear them, for like most liberals, he's got a Democrat violent rhetoric filter that only allows hateful comments by conservatives to come through. You think you have to buy such a device, or are they passed out for free by the DNC to all media members that want them?
Continue reading …Embattled president promises end to 48 years of emergency law, more ‘humble’ government, and action on unemployment Syria’s embattled president, Bashar al-Assad, has promised to end 48 years of emergency law and instigate further reforms, but failed to satisfy those protesting against his 11-year rule. In a speech to his new cabinet, Assad said restrictions would be lifted by the end of the week. He blamed the month-long protests on a “conspiracy” and said stability remained his priority but reform was needed to strengthen the country. Syria’s protest movement, which has gathered momentum in recent weeks, swelled to unprecedented levels on Friday as thousands of people marched on Damascus from surrounding areas. Assad’s tone was more conciliatory than in a previous speech to parliament on 30 March, directing ministers to become more accountable and humble. “Citizens need security and services, but also dignity. We want to engage in dialogue with the unions and with national organisations,” he said. Protesters rejected Assad’s move as too little, too late. They said continuing arrests and a state media campaign to blame violence on armed gangs was deliberately inciting anger towards protesters. “The tone was different but there were no concrete reforms again; many still don’t trust emergency law will be lifted,” said an analyst in the capital, Damascus, who asked for anonymity. “If he had made this speech on 30 March, it may have been different, but now it is too late.” The protests this week have resulted in fewer deaths than the previous week, in a sign the regime may be trying to calm dissent, according to latest reports. The protesters have demanded an end to emergency laws and more freedoms. But they have also called for an end to abuses by the security services and the release of all political prisoners. Both topics were notably absent from Assad’s speech. Instead he talked about Syria’s media, its municipal elections and political parties and, in reference to claims of ministerial corruption, said that ministers should provide details of their income and property. He also acknowledged the country’s economic troubles, calling unemployment “the biggest problem”. Activists accuse Syrian leaders of framing the demands of protesters in economic rather than political terms – although in eastern areas of the country financial worries are their priority. “Assad still didn’t talk about the reason for the crisis in the country,” said Razan Zeitouneh, a lawyer and human rights activist in Damascus. “And he ignored the main demands of the people: freedom and democracy.” Mmore than 1,000 women were reported to have held a protest in the coastal city of Banias. Protests in this heavily repressive state were unthinkable before March, when activists inspired by uprisings sweeping the Arab world broke through a barrier of fear. Further demonstrations are being planned for Sunday, which is a national holiday in Syria. Bashar Al-Assad Syria Protest Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Katherine Marsh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …