Engineers continue to tackle problems caused by scrapyard fire as thousands flock to capital for FA Cup semi and marathon A seven-mile stretch of the M1 southbound into London may remain closed until Monday morning, forcing thousands of football fans travelling to London for the second FA Cup semi-final on Sunday to take other routes. Only one lane northbound was open as engineers continued to tackle the problems caused by a fire in a scrapyard early on Friday. A second influx of football supporters from Bolton and Stoke follows those who watched the Manchester derby at Wembley on Saturday while thousands more people have come to watch the London marathon. The Highways Agency said urgent repairs were needed before the rest of the motorway could be reopened. “The viaduct does need to be reinforced before it can carry the weight of traffic and we are putting in supports so we can reopen the road as soon as possible,” said a spokesman. “At the same time we are continuing our investigations to determine what remedial work needs to be carried out.” A number of gas cylinders were involved in the blaze and a hazard zone was set up in case they exploded in the heat, London Fire Brigade said. Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson had complained about the matches being held in London soon after the draw was made, saying the decision to make four northern clubs play in the capital was “quite incredible”. Transport FA Cup London Marathon James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Engineers continue to tackle problems caused by scrapyard fire as thousands flock to capital for FA Cup semi and marathon A seven-mile stretch of the M1 southbound into London may remain closed until Monday morning, forcing thousands of football fans travelling to London for the second FA Cup semi-final on Sunday to take other routes. Only one lane northbound was open as engineers continued to tackle the problems caused by a fire in a scrapyard early on Friday. A second influx of football supporters from Bolton and Stoke follows those who watched the Manchester derby at Wembley on Saturday while thousands more people have come to watch the London marathon. The Highways Agency said urgent repairs were needed before the rest of the motorway could be reopened. “The viaduct does need to be reinforced before it can carry the weight of traffic and we are putting in supports so we can reopen the road as soon as possible,” said a spokesman. “At the same time we are continuing our investigations to determine what remedial work needs to be carried out.” A number of gas cylinders were involved in the blaze and a hazard zone was set up in case they exploded in the heat, London Fire Brigade said. Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson had complained about the matches being held in London soon after the draw was made, saying the decision to make four northern clubs play in the capital was “quite incredible”. Transport FA Cup London Marathon James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …In Simone Lia’s oil story, Sarah tries to get a grip on a slippery subject after a bad dream casts a dark shadow
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with our own Driftglass and Bluegal , otherwise known as The Professional Left, or soon to be Mr. and Mrs. Driftglass. Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everyone. Link for the podcast: Harold Ford Jr. shows that Math is Hard! You can listen to the archives and listen to the archives free with no downloads at http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/ and you can also make a donation there if you’d like to help keep these podcasts going.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media John King knew he was going to be criticized for bringing in Birther queen Orly Taitz during a segment which began with talking about whether or not Gov. Jan Brewer is going to sign Arizona’s Birther law which just made its way through their state legislature . Here’s the damage control from King at the end of the segment from the criticism he knew he had coming: KING: I’m going to end the conversation now. People are entitled to go to your Web site and I hope we can talk again. But I’m going to end this conversation tonight right now. Listen, I sit in meetings for those of you at home and I’m going to pick this up and read it all. For those at home who says, you know, you crazy jerk, why are you even going down this road? I’m going down this road because our job is not just to cover things that we know to be true. It’s our job is to cover things that people are talking about in politics. And to try, to try to have rational conversations about why people believe what they believe, even if our reporting suggests what they believe is not true. And we will continue to do that. I can assure you, we will never be perfect, but we try to do it in a respectful way. There’s nothing “respectful” about spending at least half of the 12 minutes of a segment of your show allowing some discredited Birther nut like Taitz to rant and rave and spew conspiracy theories that you know aren’t true. Well, at least someone on CNN admitted what we already knew was true: Facts don’t matter much in their reporting. If some wingnut politician or political figure says something, they must cover it in the name of being “fair and balanced.” King went on to ask if the White House is somehow more worried about the Birther nonsense than they’re letting on and if they’re trying to “at least use a subtle message to rebut this.” Yeah, that’s it, John. They’re speaking to the Birthers in coded messages that the rest of us somehow missed. Transcript of the portion via CNN below the fold. KING: OK. Let me — let me Cornell — stay with us, please. I’m sorry. But stay with us. I just want to let Cornell into the conversation — because when you listen to that, you can say, if you want, you can say, crazy. You can say absurd. However — however, you’re in the polling business, and a chunk and not an insignificant chunk of the American people believe this. Let’s look at our latest poll. Was Barack Obama born in the United States? Definitely yes: 46 percent. Probably yes: 26 percent. Probably no: 15 percent. Definitely no: 10 percent. Ten percent of all Americans think their president is not born in this country. CORNELL BELCHER: And I wonder what party they — KING: Well, you say what party. So, let’s look it. Let’s break it down by party. Was Barack Obama born in the United States? Forty-three percent of Republicans say probably or definitely not. Twenty-three percent of independents say probably or definitely not. But this one jumps out and surprised me — 11 percent of Democrats say probably or definitely not. Does the president have to do something more proactively to clean this up? Or as he said yesterday with this interview with George Stephanopoulos, you know, I don’t do conspiracy theories. Is that enough? BELCHER: No. KING: Is that enough that in a close election, this controversy, we at CNN have done a lot of work on this and we think it’s bogus, but 43 percent of Republicans, 23 percent of independents and 11 percent of Democrats have doubts. BELCHER: Forty-three percent of Republicans is what you want to focus on, quite frankly. As someone who did polling work for the Obama campaign, it’s not something that’s new to me and something that sort of has a direct relationship with their inability to sort of accept Barack Obama. The problem here is this: it is so categorically insane and you have so many sort of rational people, you know, not wanting to accept the truth. You have to ask: what is it about this president that makes them not want to accept the truth? Why are so many people vesting so much in something that is categorically — KING: Orly, I think the question Cornell is asking, he’s trying to ask it more politely. Let me ask it bluntly. If Barack Obama were white, would we be going through this? TAITZ: Absolutely. And as a matter of fact, when President McCain ran for office, the Senate — KING: President McCain said — Senator McCain, excuse me, Senator McCain said, take this off the table. He is an American. I believe he is an American. Let’s talk about his views on taxes. Let’s talk about his views on Social Security. Let’s talk about his views on national security. TAITZ: Let me answer. When Senator McCain wanted to run there was a hearing, a senatorial hearing, and it was Senate resolution 511 whereby it was decided that he was a natural born citizen. And as a matter of fact, what I believe is there is a political correctness that went haywire that allowed Barack Obama to get in the White House with a stolen Social Security number. Here, I have documents that the nation needs to see. This is — BELCHER: Senator McCain — here’s the problem. You’ve dominated the time. (CROSSTALK) TAITZ: No, no, sir. BELCHER: You’ve dominated the time. I’m going to talk. Senator McCain is a guy who wasn’t born in this country and you don’t have the same sort of fervor going around saying anything — (CROSSTALK) BELCHER: What’s the variable? What is the variable here? The variable here is you’ve got an African-American president. TAITZ: No. No. BELCHER: None of this ever came up (INAUDIBLE) African-American president. That’s the only variable here. And when you have this sort of ill logic, there is nothing the president can do to sort of prove this. You have a birth certificate. You have an announcement. They reject the truth. They don’t want the truth to be true. Why do they want this truth to be true in this case with this president? KING: Let me play — I’m going to play devil’s advocate here. Hold on one second. Just one second. I will let you answer. Hold on one second. My name is in the funny lights behind me. I get to talk just a little bit. I want you — this is the cynic in me, Cornell, that the White House says they don’t worry about this, but every now and then, you start to hear things where I think that somebody quietly is trying to at least use a subtle message to rebut this. Listen to this recent little — several little snippets of the president and things around him. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: We’re all Americans. And that spirit of patriotism. This isn’t a Democratic or a Republican idea, it’s patriotism. This is what America is all about, everybody from different places, enjoying those things that bind us together. The thing about America is that is great is that we’re bold. We’re tough. We show the world that all things are possible in the United States of America. (END VIDEO CLIP) BELCHER: That’s who he is. I mean, that’s not new. That’s going back to the very beginning of this campaign. Look, we’ve got a fairly good percentage of Republicans last time around who voted for us, I mean, somebody, I think even Ike’s daughter voted for us because of this idea of American exceptionalism. There were articles after articles sort of saying this president reminds us of Ronald Reagan because of his exceptionalism. TAITZ: Sir, I mean, look, this is ridiculous. BELCHER: The ideals this guy believes that we are one and sort of patriotic. Patriotism isn’t a Republican ideal. It’s a Democratic ideal as well. KING: Orly, we’ve been waiting. TAITZ: Let me respond to this. KING: Let me ask you a question. We’ve been waiting — Donald Trump, the businessman who says he may run for president. We’re waiting — he’s supposed to do a live event down in Florida. That’s the event right there where he’s supposed to come out and talk to reporters. He has – he has risen in the polls among Republicans to second in our recent poll behind Mike Huckabee, tied with Mike Huckabee at 19 percent. He has jumped up in the polls the last few weeks because he has been beating this like a drum. Would you vote for Donald Trump for president? TAITZ: Absolutely. And it’s not only because of the Social Security issue. Not only because of the birth certificate. Barack Obama is committing Social Security fraud. The biggest crime ever committed — KING: You’re accusing the president of the United States of committing a felony. TAITZ: Absolutely. Yes. And he’s not a legitimate — he’s not legitimate president. Here is selective service certificate that can be seen on my Web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com, and it was filed with the courts. KING: I’m going to end the conversation now. People are entitled to go to your Web site and I hope we can talk again. But I’m going to end this conversation tonight right now. Listen, I sit in meetings for those of you at home and I’m going to pick this up and read it all. For those at home who says, you know, you crazy jerk, why are you even going down this road? I’m going down this road because our job is not just to cover things that we know to be true. It’s our job is to cover things that people are talking about in politics. And to try, to try to have rational conversations about why people believe what they believe, even if our reporting suggests what they believe is not true. And we will continue to do that. I can assure you, we will never be perfect, but we try to do it in a respectful way.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media John King knew he was going to be criticized for bringing in Birther queen Orly Taitz during a segment which began with talking about whether or not Gov. Jan Brewer is going to sign Arizona’s Birther law which just made its way through their state legislature . Here’s the damage control from King at the end of the segment from the criticism he knew he had coming: KING: I’m going to end the conversation now. People are entitled to go to your Web site and I hope we can talk again. But I’m going to end this conversation tonight right now. Listen, I sit in meetings for those of you at home and I’m going to pick this up and read it all. For those at home who says, you know, you crazy jerk, why are you even going down this road? I’m going down this road because our job is not just to cover things that we know to be true. It’s our job is to cover things that people are talking about in politics. And to try, to try to have rational conversations about why people believe what they believe, even if our reporting suggests what they believe is not true. And we will continue to do that. I can assure you, we will never be perfect, but we try to do it in a respectful way. There’s nothing “respectful” about spending at least half of the 12 minutes of a segment of your show allowing some discredited Birther nut like Taitz to rant and rave and spew conspiracy theories that you know aren’t true. Well, at least someone on CNN admitted what we already knew was true: Facts don’t matter much in their reporting. If some wingnut politician or political figure says something, they must cover it in the name of being “fair and balanced.” King went on to ask if the White House is somehow more worried about the Birther nonsense than they’re letting on and if they’re trying to “at least use a subtle message to rebut this.” Yeah, that’s it, John. They’re speaking to the Birthers in coded messages that the rest of us somehow missed. Transcript of the portion via CNN below the fold. KING: OK. Let me — let me Cornell — stay with us, please. I’m sorry. But stay with us. I just want to let Cornell into the conversation — because when you listen to that, you can say, if you want, you can say, crazy. You can say absurd. However — however, you’re in the polling business, and a chunk and not an insignificant chunk of the American people believe this. Let’s look at our latest poll. Was Barack Obama born in the United States? Definitely yes: 46 percent. Probably yes: 26 percent. Probably no: 15 percent. Definitely no: 10 percent. Ten percent of all Americans think their president is not born in this country. CORNELL BELCHER: And I wonder what party they — KING: Well, you say what party. So, let’s look it. Let’s break it down by party. Was Barack Obama born in the United States? Forty-three percent of Republicans say probably or definitely not. Twenty-three percent of independents say probably or definitely not. But this one jumps out and surprised me — 11 percent of Democrats say probably or definitely not. Does the president have to do something more proactively to clean this up? Or as he said yesterday with this interview with George Stephanopoulos, you know, I don’t do conspiracy theories. Is that enough? BELCHER: No. KING: Is that enough that in a close election, this controversy, we at CNN have done a lot of work on this and we think it’s bogus, but 43 percent of Republicans, 23 percent of independents and 11 percent of Democrats have doubts. BELCHER: Forty-three percent of Republicans is what you want to focus on, quite frankly. As someone who did polling work for the Obama campaign, it’s not something that’s new to me and something that sort of has a direct relationship with their inability to sort of accept Barack Obama. The problem here is this: it is so categorically insane and you have so many sort of rational people, you know, not wanting to accept the truth. You have to ask: what is it about this president that makes them not want to accept the truth? Why are so many people vesting so much in something that is categorically — KING: Orly, I think the question Cornell is asking, he’s trying to ask it more politely. Let me ask it bluntly. If Barack Obama were white, would we be going through this? TAITZ: Absolutely. And as a matter of fact, when President McCain ran for office, the Senate — KING: President McCain said — Senator McCain, excuse me, Senator McCain said, take this off the table. He is an American. I believe he is an American. Let’s talk about his views on taxes. Let’s talk about his views on Social Security. Let’s talk about his views on national security. TAITZ: Let me answer. When Senator McCain wanted to run there was a hearing, a senatorial hearing, and it was Senate resolution 511 whereby it was decided that he was a natural born citizen. And as a matter of fact, what I believe is there is a political correctness that went haywire that allowed Barack Obama to get in the White House with a stolen Social Security number. Here, I have documents that the nation needs to see. This is — BELCHER: Senator McCain — here’s the problem. You’ve dominated the time. (CROSSTALK) TAITZ: No, no, sir. BELCHER: You’ve dominated the time. I’m going to talk. Senator McCain is a guy who wasn’t born in this country and you don’t have the same sort of fervor going around saying anything — (CROSSTALK) BELCHER: What’s the variable? What is the variable here? The variable here is you’ve got an African-American president. TAITZ: No. No. BELCHER: None of this ever came up (INAUDIBLE) African-American president. That’s the only variable here. And when you have this sort of ill logic, there is nothing the president can do to sort of prove this. You have a birth certificate. You have an announcement. They reject the truth. They don’t want the truth to be true. Why do they want this truth to be true in this case with this president? KING: Let me play — I’m going to play devil’s advocate here. Hold on one second. Just one second. I will let you answer. Hold on one second. My name is in the funny lights behind me. I get to talk just a little bit. I want you — this is the cynic in me, Cornell, that the White House says they don’t worry about this, but every now and then, you start to hear things where I think that somebody quietly is trying to at least use a subtle message to rebut this. Listen to this recent little — several little snippets of the president and things around him. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: We’re all Americans. And that spirit of patriotism. This isn’t a Democratic or a Republican idea, it’s patriotism. This is what America is all about, everybody from different places, enjoying those things that bind us together. The thing about America is that is great is that we’re bold. We’re tough. We show the world that all things are possible in the United States of America. (END VIDEO CLIP) BELCHER: That’s who he is. I mean, that’s not new. That’s going back to the very beginning of this campaign. Look, we’ve got a fairly good percentage of Republicans last time around who voted for us, I mean, somebody, I think even Ike’s daughter voted for us because of this idea of American exceptionalism. There were articles after articles sort of saying this president reminds us of Ronald Reagan because of his exceptionalism. TAITZ: Sir, I mean, look, this is ridiculous. BELCHER: The ideals this guy believes that we are one and sort of patriotic. Patriotism isn’t a Republican ideal. It’s a Democratic ideal as well. KING: Orly, we’ve been waiting. TAITZ: Let me respond to this. KING: Let me ask you a question. We’ve been waiting — Donald Trump, the businessman who says he may run for president. We’re waiting — he’s supposed to do a live event down in Florida. That’s the event right there where he’s supposed to come out and talk to reporters. He has – he has risen in the polls among Republicans to second in our recent poll behind Mike Huckabee, tied with Mike Huckabee at 19 percent. He has jumped up in the polls the last few weeks because he has been beating this like a drum. Would you vote for Donald Trump for president? TAITZ: Absolutely. And it’s not only because of the Social Security issue. Not only because of the birth certificate. Barack Obama is committing Social Security fraud. The biggest crime ever committed — KING: You’re accusing the president of the United States of committing a felony. TAITZ: Absolutely. Yes. And he’s not a legitimate — he’s not legitimate president. Here is selective service certificate that can be seen on my Web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com, and it was filed with the courts. KING: I’m going to end the conversation now. People are entitled to go to your Web site and I hope we can talk again. But I’m going to end this conversation tonight right now. Listen, I sit in meetings for those of you at home and I’m going to pick this up and read it all. For those at home who says, you know, you crazy jerk, why are you even going down this road? I’m going down this road because our job is not just to cover things that we know to be true. It’s our job is to cover things that people are talking about in politics. And to try, to try to have rational conversations about why people believe what they believe, even if our reporting suggests what they believe is not true. And we will continue to do that. I can assure you, we will never be perfect, but we try to do it in a respectful way.
Continue reading …A photo taken at a Tea Party demonstration in Boston carried at Yahoo News carries the following caption (HT Powerline ): VIDEO: April 15 was tax day in the United States, and Tea Party radicals used it to stage demonstrations across the country, including near the site of the original Boston Tea Party revolt of the colonial era. The photo was grabbed from an Agency France-Presse video with an identical description. The pic and caption follow the jump: John's reaction at Powerline : Spending our country into bankruptcy? Sensible! Trying to get a handle on our national debt? Radical! Such is the topsy-turvy political world in which we live. The video at AFP's YouTube account , where embedding has apparently been disabled, is worth a look for its final few seconds, the time during which the picture was captioned. The pictured Tea Partier endures an intolerant pro-union rant, where the roughly transcribed words which follow don't do justice to the hostility displayed: The Tea Party means cutbacks for all of us. … unions are here to tell you, you're not welcome in Boston. Charming. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .
Continue reading …If you ever experience something like this , call the insurance company and demand to speak to a supervisor: “I’m filing a complaint with the insurance commission and also with my congressman, and I want to make sure I have the correct details for why you’re refusing me a necessary medical test as ordered by my physician. Oh, and I want to make sure I spell your name right.” While your state insurance commission is possibly in the pocket of the industry, they do at least investigate these cases, and the insurance companies just don’t want the hassle. It may not always work, but it’s worked for me so far for the five or six times I did it: “I gotta tell you Kathy, I can’t keep living like this,” said Michael Fields, 46, who was experiencing tightness in his chest, numbness in an arm and light-headedness as he begged the voice at the other end of the line for help. “It’s been going on for weeks. I don’t know what else to do. I mean you know, I’m trapped here.” “Alright, let me put you back on hold,” came the reply. Fields, who lives with his wife and son in Elkton, Md., was not speaking with a 911 operator. He was calling a representative from his insurance provider, Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Delaware, and he was about to find out that for the third time he was being denied a crucial test to determine if he had coronary artery disease — a nuclear cardiac stress test. A Senate investigation released Friday found a pattern of inappropriate denials for tests like the one Fields’ doctors say he should have received from the start. The investigation looked at 1,600 cases over a six-month period from 2009 to 2010 involving requests for nuclear cardiac stress tests in the state of Delaware. All of the cases studied were handled by MedSolutions, a company that screens test requests in the state for Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Delaware and other insurers. According to the report, “10 to 15 (percent) of requested tests appear to have been denied inappropriately. MedSolutions and the Delaware insurers denied a significant number of medically necessary nuclear stress tests.” “It is a huge number,” Sen. John D. Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee told NBC News. “I don’t care if it is 5 to 2 percent, it is a huge percent. It follows a pattern that never stops with health insurance companies. It is always the bottom line. The more they say no, the more money they make.” Michael Fields was one of those found to have been wrongly denied. When Fields first complained about his symptoms over a year ago, his physician sent him to get a stress test. The request was denied by Blue Cross Blue Shield, and denied again after two appeals by the physician. Finally, his doctor sent him to the hospital, where cardiologists found that a key blood vessel to his heart was almost completely blocked. The next day Fields had an emergency quadruple heart bypass.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Now here’s a dramatic way to make a point — Montana style: “About 96 people think they know better than the 990,000 people in Montana,” says Governor Schweitzer. Governor Schweitzer had the veto brands hot. Covering the gamet of issues important to Montanans, Schweitzer vetoed bills having to do with air and water, jobs and healthcare. “When I swore to uphold the constitution, I meant it. There’s some in this building who say, we don’t care about the constitution and we don’t care about the will of the people.” Now I’m sure right-wingers will rush to their fainting couches and demand Schweitzer apologize for being so violent and uncivil with his branding imagery. But they’ll have to explain why Montana Republicans tried to keep up with Schweitzer by bringing their own brand to the gathering: Republican Senator Jason Priest, who had three bills vetoed Wednesday, says he wasn’t impressed with the theatrics. “Consistently throughout this session we see the Governor making light of the bills that are coming across his desk instead of taking these proposals seriously,” says Priest. Priest brought a prop of his own. “That’s why we got this brand today. We think Montanans are getting a bum steer and that’s the BS on this brand.” And while it may have been a stunt, it was a stunt with an important point: But Senate Democrat Cliff Larsen says the demonstration gave Schweitzer a platform to tell people about bills that could really hurt. “The Governor used the opportunity to really make a statement about a lot of the bad bills that came through because there are a group of extremists in the Republican party that have pushed some of the agendas,” says Larson. Indeed, as we’ve reported, a group of far-right extremists took over the Montana Legislature this year under the banner of the Tea Party, and they’ve been running amok. Schweitzer torched a number of their bills today: SB 114 – Hinkle – Federal law enforcement officers should communicate with sheriff HB 318 – Warburton – Ensure county oversight in movement of publicly-owned wild buffalo or bison SB 109 – Barrett – Revise definition of eligible renewable resources HB 272 – Flynn – Eliminate ability for FWP to use hunting access fees to acquire fee title lands SB 159 – Priest – Revise energy efficiency and code adoption requirements in building codes HB 180 – Edmunds – Revise close of voter registration SB 306 – Murphy – Revise mining laws regarding cyanide health and vat leach open-pit mining HB 456 – Smith – Define scope/ boundaries of human sexuality/reproduct ed in K-12 public schools HB 464 – Blasdel – Provide medical liability protection for hard-to-recruit subspecialists SB 111 – Sonju – Limit noneconomic damages in motor vehicle accidents SB 228 – Priest – Prohibit creation of health insurance exchange under PPACA SB 324 – Balyeat – Revise consumer protection laws and settlement proceeds SB 370 – Priest – Require cost-benefit analysis of mandated health insurance coverage of service SB 254 – Hutton – Provide state eminent domain authority for federal lands HB 161 – Milburn – Repeal medical marijuana law SB 183 – Brown – Revise interim zoning laws HB 542 – Esp – Revise subdivision and platting act Good for Schweitzer. He’s obviously figured out that giving these extremists even an inch will mean they’ll take a mile.
Continue reading …Who cares about being antisocial? Some meals are so good the foul after-effects are worth it… I am, for the most part, a sociable chap. I like the company of others. Apart from homeopaths, libertarians, Morris dancers and men who drive small sporty BMWs with leather trim. Oh, and John McCririck. Other than that, come one, come all. In certain matters of appetite, however, I
Continue reading …