Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1269)
Is reality TV in rude health?

Some said the reality genre had died with Big Brother, but two new shows and the success of The Only Way is Essex suggest it’s more tanned and buffed than ever It’s the kind of casting announcement that can only be greeted with incredulity. “Cheeky chappy Gaz’s claim to fame is having a manhood the size of a TV remote control.” “Sexy diva Holly with her double FF fake boobs also isn’t afraid of getting into a scrap or two.” Meet the new stars of Geordie Shore, launching next month, the latest UK reality show to follow hot on the towering, bespangled heels of The Only Way is Essex. When Big Brother left our screens it was tempting to think that reality TV was dead and buried. But instead it has reinvented itself, using US shows such as Jersey Shore as templates for success. TOWIE – the ITV2 show that has gifted the tabloids a new set of stars in much the same manner that Big Brother once did, attracts an audience of almost a million live, and as many online. Reality TV is clearly very much still alive – only this time it comes wearing rather more mascara or sporting more buffed muscles. Geordie Shore show will air on MTV; which used to stand for “music television”. Those days are long gone: a glance at the schedule reveals wall-to-wall reality shows, including The Hills, Parental Control, 16 and Pregnant, Teen Mom, Paris Hilton’s Dubai BFF and of course, Jersey Shore. Many of the channel’s viewers wouldn’t even have been alive in 1992 when MTV launched its first reality series The Real World, featuring naive middle-class participants. Since then reality shows have evolved so that they no longer mirror what most people would recognise as real life. One of the latest additions to the format is Sky Living’s The Hunks. “We’re thinking a cross between Baywatch and Jersey Shore – but with feelings,” claim the programme-makers, who also produced TOWIE. Ten gel-haired himbos are thrown together in a cliff-top penthouse overlooking the beach in Newquay for a summer of surfing, womanising and heavy drinking. The Hunks agonise over what to wear, what to drink (Malibu and Amaretto are rather unlikely favourites) and whether or not to wax their chests. Much of their time is spent preening and refurbishing themselves in a never ending routine of teeth (and eye) whitening, press-ups and spray-tanning. A philosophical debate of sorts occurs when one of them is revealed to be gay. “I’m not homophobic or raceophobic but …” a housemate tails off, almost immediately losing the thrust of his argument. Things start happening, for want of a better term, when the dudes head into town, a sight to behold with their undersized T-shirts and oversized muscles. “Let’s ‘ave it” they chant, and inevitably, drunken debauchery ensues. Watching The Hunks is an unsettling experience: you try to avert your eyes, but can’t quite turn away. You can’t help wondering when something is going to happen, but it never really does. There seems to be no limit to the number of British remakes of hit US shows. Also in production is Geordie Finishing School for Girls which will take four affluent young women from the south of England and transport them to “the other side of the tracks” on a run-down Tyneside estate. It all sounds rather reminiscent of The Simple Life, although at least Nicole and Paris seemed to be in on the joke. So does the prospect of Geordie Shore and its six weeks of “unadulterated partying Toon-style” have you reaching for the record button? Is The Hunks a must-see? Is TOWIE on your must-watch list? Let us know below … Reality TV Television Kathy Sweeney guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ed Schultz Calls John Boehner and Paul Ryan Liars Moments Before Lying About Medicare

Ed Schultz's pattern of accusing Republicans of lying moments before lying himself continued Tuesday evening. Just moments after calling House Speaker John Boehner (R-Oh.) and Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) liars, the host of MSNBC's “Ed Show” misinformed his viewers about Medicare (video follows with transcript and commentary): ED SCHULTZ, HOST: Good evening, Americans. And welcome to THE ED SHOW tonight from 30 Rock, Rockefeller Plaza in New York City. We have got two big stories tonight. Just hold it a second. I was going to go to Kenosha, Wisconsin today but I couldn't because I am afraid I would have said something that would have gotten me in trouble. That's how passionate I am about this, because Paul Ryan is out there saying stuff that is not true. We`re going to get into his budget plan tonight. And John Boehner is flat out lying about taxing oil companies. Oh, this is a hot one. It's THE ED SHOW. Let's get to work. Moments later: SCHULTZ: Let’s look at this chart. This is how good it was for Medicare `50s, `60s, `70s, 1990, 2000. But now, we’re into the real red neck conservative years. They want to change everything. They want to get the New Deal. This is part of the New Deal they want to erase. Schultz clearly has problems with dates whenever he shows one of these charts: Medicare wasn't around in the '50s. It was signed into law by former President Lyndon Baines Johnson on July 30, 1965. This also means it wasn't part of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. It was part of LBJ's Great Society. But since Ryan's 2012 budget proposal was released weeks ago, Schultz has regularly misinformed viewers about Medicare being part of the New Deal. As readers know, I have been making the case for some time that nobody at MSNBC is overseeing the falsehoods being spread by this man and others on this so-called news network on a daily basis. At the beginning of this very program, Schultz said, “I was going to go to Kenosha, Wisconsin today but I couldn't because I am afraid I would have said something that would have gotten me in trouble.” Shouldn't lying on national television get him in trouble, or do Comcast and General Electric, the joint owners of MSNBC, think that's okay?

Continue reading …
Mother jailed for killing children

American Theresa Riggi admitted killing eight-year-old twin boys and five-year-old girl in Edinburgh before attempting suicide A mother who admitted stabbing her three children to death at their home in Edinburgh after a bitter custody dispute has been jailed for 16 years. Theresa Riggi, 47, originally from California, pleaded guilty in March to killing her children – eight-year-old twins Austin and Gianluca, and their sister Cecilia, five – at their home in west Edinburgh. She stabbed each of them eight times and then allegedly tried to cover up their deaths with a gas explosion, before trying to kill herself by leaping out of their second-floor flat. Riggi was facing court action for custody by her estranged husband, Pasquale Riggi, an oil industry engineer in Aberdeen. Passing sentence at the high court in Glasgow, Lord Bracadale told Riggi she had subjected her children to “a truly disturbing degree of violence” and was guilty of a “ghastly and grotesque” act. The judge said Riggi had “a genuine but abnormal and possessive love” for her children. The court heard in March that Riggi suffered from narcissistic, paranoid and hysterical personality disorders, had refused to allow her husband to share a bed with her and the children, and had been increasingly possessive. The couple separated soon after Cecilia was born. Psychiatrists did not, however, believe she was mentally ill, the judge said. “The result of these acts is a devastating family tragedy. The father of the children, Pasquale Riggi, and the wider family, have been left utterly bereft by the loss of the children.” The prosecution accepted Riggi’s plea of culpable homicide, the Scottish version of manslaughter, on the basis of diminished responsibility in March. Charges accusing her of recklessly causing an explosion by tampering with her home’s gas cooker were set aside. Bracadale said this plea and her mental state did not absolve her of blame. “The effect of the diminished responsibility is to reduce these crimes from what would have been exceptionally wicked crimes of murder to what are still very serious crimes of culpable homicide,” he said. “The number and nature of the stab wounds to each child is indicative of a truly disturbing degree of violence, which, in order to bring about the deaths of three children, must have been sustained over a significant period of time. “It is difficult to envisage the physical commission of such acts. Dr Crichton [a psychiatrist] considers that the degree of violence and the sustained nature of it are inexplicable in terms of your disorder of the mind. “It is clear that any degree of responsibility for such ghastly and grotesque acts must be visited with a lengthy sentence of imprisonment.” Outside the court, in a statement read out on his behalf by David Sinclair, of Victim Support Scotland, Pasquale Riggi said his children’s deaths would leave an “indelible mark on the rest of his life”. He added: “They were such wonderful, energetic, bright and happy children. Those of us who had the pleasure of knowing Cecilia, Luke and Austin looked forward to watching them grow. “There is no justification for this heinous crime, repeated three times, nor is there any sentence that can provide justice for the overwhelming loss of three lives and the subsequent painful grief and devastation caused to surviving family and friends.” Bracadale said that Riggi would have been sentenced to 18 years in prison, but he added a discount of two years following her guilty plea. He told Riggi she would be deported as soon as her sentence was completed, and placed on the child protection register. The children’s bodies were discovered side by side minutes after a gas explosion at their home in Slateford, west Edinburgh. Passersby saw Riggi clamber over the second-floor balcony of the building and throw herself off. Her fall was broken by a neighbour, who managed to push her falling body on to a parked car. Riggi had several self-inflicted wounds. Donald Findlay QC, her defence counsel, told the court in March that Riggi was “in the midst of an acute stress reaction” at the time of the murders. “Theresa Riggi is not evil, she is not wicked, she is not a monster. If it is possible to love one’s children too much, she loved them too much. [She] believed the children and she were safer together in death than they ever could be in life,” he said. The court heard in March that Riggi had been due to attend a hearing on the children’s future the day before they were killed. The court of session, Scotland’s civil court, had already seized Riggi’s passport and appointed a child psychologist. Alex Prentice QC, for the prosecution, said that several days before the deaths, she had told a friend that things were so bad he would “hear about it on the national news”. Two days before the explosion, Riggi had accused her husband during a telephone conversation of being in collusion with their solicitors and asked if he would take the children away. After he told her she “left him no choice”, Riggi retorted, “say goodbye, then”, and hung up the phone. Crime Scotland Severin Carrell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Is this a shock to anyone that pays attention to economy? From the WSJ: Greece’s Budget Deficit Higher Than Expected Greece’s budget deficit in 2010 was 10.5% of gross domestic product, significantly larger than forecast … Lower-than-expected government revenue was the main culprit behind the higher deficit number. … The Greek government was targeting a 2010 deficit of 9.4% of GDP … The missed target was “mainly the result of the deeper-than-anticipated recession of the Greek economy that affected tax revenue and social security contributions,” the Greek government said in a statement after the Eurostat announcement. More austerity coming – the beatings will continue until morale improves! It doesn’t take a math whiz to understand that you can’t cut your way to prosperity without raising revenues. Republicans should have lost all credibility in the Beltway media since they refuse to embrace any type of tax increases. ( h/t Atrios )

Continue reading …
Afraid To Face Angry Voters, Rep. Paul Ryan Sneaks Out A Back Door After Raucous Town Hall

Click here to view this media Paul Ryan is flipping out that town hall attendees aren’t going to follow his command to “play nice” in front of the media. Can you imagine the sheer arrogance? Do you think he told Tea Party members to behave nicely during last year’s health care town halls? It’s a joy to watch his constituents let him have it last night. What a little weasel: KENOSHA – Protesters waited for Congressman Paul Ryan outside a listening session at Gateway Technical College in Kenosha, many of them were seniors holding preprinted signs that read ‘Hands Off My Medicare.’ They chanted, “Ryan stop lying!” There was capacity crowd inside the school’s Madrigrana Auditorium. “Do not renew the Bush tax credit for the wealthy,” one man said during the public comment period, even giving out his phone number in front of everyone. “I’ll debate these issues with you anytime, just call me.” At times, the Janesville Republican sounded more like a referee than a lawmaker. “If you’re yelling, I just want to ask you to leave,” Ryan requested. “If you’re going to scream out like that, it’s just not polite to everyone. We’ve got media here. Let’s prove to them that Wisconsinites can be cordial with one another.” TODAY’S TMJ4 set up an interview with Ryan following the meeting, but it was scrapped by staffers and police over a security concern. The congressman changed the door where he planned to exit and left in a different vehicle than the one than he arrived in. “There were just definitely some loud hecklers who came that gave the police a little concern ,” Ryan told TODAY’S TMJ4 reporter by phone. “I left in another car with the police. My car, some people did surround. But, they didn’t cause any problems and I had a staffer who drove my car and we had really no problems.” Ryan insists the hurried exit should not be “blown out of proportion.”

Continue reading …
Ed Schultz Calls John Boehner and Paul Ryan Liars Before Lying About Medicare

Ed Schultz's pattern of accusing Republicans of lying moments before lying himself continued Tuesday evening. Literally seconds after calling House Speaker John Boehner (R-Oh.) and Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) liars, the host of MSNBC's “Ed Show” misinformed his viewers about Medicare (video follows with transcript and commentary): ED SCHULTZ, HOST: Good evening, Americans. And welcome to THE ED SHOW tonight from 30 Rock, Rockefeller Plaza in New York City. We have got two big stories tonight. Just hold it a second. I was going to go to Kenosha, Wisconsin today but I couldn't because I am afraid I would have said something that would have gotten me in trouble. That's how passionate I am about this, because Paul Ryan is out there saying stuff that is not true. We`re going to get into his budget plan tonight. And John Boehner is flat out lying about taxing oil companies. Oh, this is a hot one. It's THE ED SHOW. Let's get to work. Shortly after: SCHULTZ: Let’s look at this chart. This is how good it was for Medicare `50s, `60s, `70s, 1990, 2000. But now, we’re into the real red neck conservative years. They want to change everything. They want to get the New Deal. This is part of the New Deal they want to erase. Schultz clearly has problems with dates whenever he shows one of these charts: Medicare wasn't around in the '50s. It was signed into law by former President Lyndon Baines Johnson on July 30, 1965. This also means it wasn't part of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. It was part of LBJ's Great Society. But since Ryan's 2012 budget proposal was released weeks ago, Schultz has regularly misinformed viewers about Medicare being part of the New Deal. As readers know, I have been making the case for some time that nobody at MSNBC is overseeing the falsehoods being spread by this man and others on this so-called news network on a daily basis. At the beginning of this very program, Schultz said, “I was going to go to Kenosha, Wisconsin today but I couldn't because I am afraid I would have said something that would have gotten me in trouble.” Shouldn't lying on national television get him in trouble, or do Comcast and General Electric, the joint owners of MSNBC, think that's okay?

Continue reading …
Aretha Franklin to release new album

Aretha: A Woman Falling Out of Love will hit Walmart stores next week, as the singer claims her health issues are now ‘resolved’ Aretha Franklin has announced her first album in eight years. With her mystery illness “resolved”, the 63-year-old revealed that she will independently release Aretha: A Woman Falling Out of Love next week. This is the thrid time Franklin is releasing a record called Aretha. But unlike the self-titled albums of 1961, 1981 and 1986, this one is being made available through the singer’s own label, Aretha Records, and she produced most of it herself. Despite reports that she was working with R Kelly , the only other production help comes from Franklin’s sons, Kecalf and Eddie. “It’s definitely going to take the boomers back,” she said last month, “but it’s also contemporary.” Franklin’s 38th studio album is a welcome surprise after almost a year of health scares. She was forced to cancel a string of concerts last year, and though she didn’t name her illness, the singer was reported to be suffering from pancreatic cancer . “The problem has been resolved,” she claimed in January, after undergoing an operation. Aretha: A Woman Falling Out of Love will be released on 3 May. For its first month, the album will only be available through US retailer Walmart; from 3 June, it will be available through digital services and other shops. The album features modern standards and familiar classics, including Theme from a Summer Place, gospel hymn His Eye Is On the Sparrow, and a version of BB King’s Sweet Sixteen. The bonus track is a live recording of Franklin performing at Barack Obama’s presidential inauguration in 2009, singing My Country, ‘Tis of Thee. “Ladies, take a good look at the photo of me on this album,” Franklin said. “This is how you’re supposed to look when you’re a woman falling out of love. Don’t sit by the phone waiting for him to call you, girlfriend; I want you to listen very closely to the lyrics of the songs on this album and you’ll hear a few good tips. Go out and have a ball!” Franklin’s last studio album, 2003′s So Damn Happy , reached No 33 on the US charts. Aretha Franklin Soul R&B Sean Michaels guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Peta posters treat women like meat

Animal-rights group risks alienating supporters by using pornographic-style posters Peta appears to have a very simple strategy when it comes to campaigning for animal rights: generate as much noise and attention as possible by unsettling and disrupting sensibilities through the use of arresting, controversial imagery. The campaign group has a long tradition of using models and celebrities to catch the eyes of the indifferent and its latest poster runs with this theme to the extreme. This time we see a former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader called Bonnie-Jill Laflin , who now acts as the NBA’s only female scout , posing naked in a locker room with a caption asking: “Want my body? Go vegetarian!” The Peta website explains that “sexy NBA scout Bonnie-Jill Laflin bares her body in a sizzling ad for PETA to show how hot a vegetarian diet can be”. It continues: A meat-free diet promotes good health and protects against numerous diseases, including heart disease, cancer, strokes, and diabetes. Vegetarians and vegans typically weigh 10 to 20 pounds less and live six to 10 years longer than their carnivorous counterparts. Scientists have also found that vegetarians and vegans have stronger immune systems than their meat-eating friends. Laflin also explains why she agreed to do the poster: I hope after seeing this campaign that people will … want to go to peta.org and get more educated and see what happens to these animals in slaughterhouses and how horrible it is, because basically you’re eating fear. So when you see these animals being slaughtered and tortured, that you’ll think twice about ordering that steak. I don’t have too many quibbles with the notion that eating a vegetarian or meat-reduced diet can have significant health benefits. However, I do have a problem with Peta presenting the idea that by becoming vegetarian you can somehow “get” Laflin’s body. Presumably, the reason Laflin has the body offered to us in the poster has very little to do with the exclusion of dead animals from her diet, but because of her genetic inheritance and the fact that she exercises every day of her life, as she admitted in a recent ESPN interview . I’ve been athletic all my life and was also a professional dancer for the NFL and NBA. Working out is an important part of my daily lifestyle. I do weight training, pilates and the bar method. Another (far larger) problem with the ad – and it hardly needs pointing out – is its blatant sexism. It is insulting on a number of levels. First, we have a woman being used as a piece of meat to urge people not to eat pieces of meat. Perhaps this is some kind of post-modern, cultural subversion thing that has gone completely over my head? But, sorry, I just don’t see it. Second, Peta and Laflin are utilising a clichéd Playboy-style pose and milieu – male locker room, pushed-out buttocks, turned head, one foot on tip-toes etc – that not only belittles and objectifies Laflin, but also implies that a man might only want to become a vegetarian because he “wants” Laflin’s body. Third, this is not the first time Peta and Laflin have combined to produce such an ad. In 2008, she was filmed lying on a table , but that time she was wearing something. Admittedly, it was little more than dental floss and lip gloss, but it seems to suggest that the creatives at Peta thought that they should go even further in their next campaign rather than have a re-think. So, who exactly is Peta trying to reach with this style of poster? I can’t believe that it only wants to turn 18-year-old jocks into vegetarians. I would guess that Peta has a disproportionately strong female following, so doesn’t this poster risk alienating supporters rather than attracting new advocates? If it really is just about making a noise then, well done Peta, I’ve played into your hands. But I seriously doubt whether this poster wins friends and influences people in quiet the way you might have imagined. Activism Food Animal welfare Advertising Food & drink Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Lilley returns with Angry Boys

Star and creator of We Can Be Heroes and Summer Heights High will be back on UK screens this summer. Will you be watching? Neighbours, Kylie, Home and Away, Prisoner Cell Block H, Dame Edna, John Torode. Australia has made its mark on television history, but it hasn’t always been pioneering. Then Chris Lilley came along. And now the creator and star of We Can Be Heroes and the immense Summer Heights High is returning to our screens with a new 12-part series, Angry Boys – you can watch a trailer for it here – a co-production between the Australian network ABC and HBO which will be shown on the BBC in the summer. As with both of his other series, Angry Boys – which the Australian network ABC says “explores what it means to be a 21st century boy by putting the male of the species under the microscope” – sees Lilley playing several characters. These include twin brothers Daniel and Nathan Sims (first seen in We Can Be Heroes) and an ambitious, tyrannical Japanese wife and mother-of-three, Jen Okazaki, whose primary focus is her son Tim who she is pushing into becoming a skateboarding champion. There is also a woefully untalented rapper and a very broad, very hard-faced female prison guard (think: an amalgam of Bad Girls’s Bodybag and Glee’s Shannon Beiste). To many, Lilley is a genius. The close, documentary-style filming of We Can Be Heroes and Summer Heights High lead to some parallels being drawn with The Office, naturally, but Lilley’s head is filled with far murkier stuff. Both We Can Be Heroes and Summer Heights High dive headfirst into some pretty swampy taboos, but all his characters – even the testier ones such as Mr G, Jonah , and Ja’mie are expertly accessible. Ja’mie, a wealthy exchange student from a private school who bullies and bitches her way through her time at a state school, is Lilley’s most notorious creation . She’s horrific; outwardly racist and ignorant, but also completely delicious. Fans of the show gobble up her dialogue like Pacman, and regurgitate it at every opportunity. I have a friend who still only speaks to me in Ja’mie-isms. Of course, it’s shocking how brilliantly a 30-something man can play a waspy teenage girl with such purse-lipped, shiny haired ease, but the beauty of her character is that she represents the universal school bitch. Lilley’s got every blithe insult, every bit of body language down to such terrifyingly accurate detail that every time she pushes her hair out her face and pouts, you’re reminded of the girl that gleefully made people feel shitty about themselves at lunchbreak. Lilley’s work relies on heightened reality – absorbing so many of the weird nuances people have to create characters that, although grotesque, remind us instantly of people we’ve encountered throughout our lives. He reminds me of Julia Davis in the way he works – in fact, the observational, often bleak nature of his comedy feels very British. Perhaps there’s even a little bit of Chris Morris there. Lilley plays with political correctness but doesn’t exploit bad taste just for the sake of a laugh. It’s cleverer than that because, although you’re laughing with your hand over your mouth at how toxic characters such as Ja’mie are, you’re also laughing at the fact that such people are probably also just a few feet away from you. Lilley is said to be a fan of Davis’s work and, when I interviewed her last year, she said she was in complete awe of him. There are parallels between the character P at Mullins in We Can Be Heroes – a middle-aged woman who dreams of rolling on her side from Perth to Uhuru – and Beverley in Davis’s Human Remains. Ja’mie’s blind self-absorption is like a mini Jill Tyrell in a school summer dress, too. Angry Boys is the first Australian product HBO have taken a significant stake in – a huge vote of approval for Lilley’s work – but it’ll be interesting to see just how palatable the characters will be to the Americans. For fans of Lilley, though, Angry Boys can’t come quickly enough. Comedy Television Eleanor Morgan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cameron dismisses Labour MP with Winner slogan

Prime minister sparks anger after using Michael Winner advertising slogan to shadow chief secretary at PMQs Labour has asked David Cameron to apologise after he told the shadow Treasury chief secretary, Angela Eagle, to “calm down, dear” at prime minister’s questions. Cameron made his remarks as he faced pressure over hospital waiting times. The prime minister repeated “calm down” several times until the Speaker, John Bercow, had to interrupt proceedings to quieten things down. His remarks caused uproar on the Labour front bench, which believes Cameron betrays an arrogance when under pressure. Labour’s official spokesman branded his remarks as “sexist, insulting and patronising”. The party called on Cameron to apologise, saying his comments had been, at the least, not prime ministerial and were arrogant. A No 10 spokesman said Cameron’s remarks had been intended to be light-hearted and were a reference to a Michael Winner advertisement, selling insurance. Eagle heckled as Cameron attempted to read a quote from the former Labour MP Howard Stoate backing the government’s NHS reforms. He claimed Stoate had been defeated at the last election by a Conservative candidate when – as Eagle was pointing out – Stoate had in fact stood down. Cameron told the Wallasey MP: “Calm down, dear, calm down. Calm down and listen to the doctor.” As the Labour benches erupted, the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls, angrily pointed to Eagle and his wife, Yvette Cooper, apparently demanding to know whom the PM had been referring to, while the party leader, Ed Miliband, appeared to call for an apology. But Cameron told them: “I said calm down, calm down dear. I’ll say it to you if you like … I’m not going to apologise. You do need to calm down.” Speaker John Bercow had to step in to quieten the Labour benches, telling MPs: “There’s far too much noise in this chamber, which makes a very bad impression on the public as a whole.” But Labour MP John Woodcock revived the row later, telling MPs that the prime minister was “losing his rag because he is losing the argument”. Danny Alexander, Liberal Democrat Treasury chief secretary half apologised on behalf of the prime minister, saying: “Obviously if something has caused offence, obviously that was not right. I hope it has not caused offence because it was a joke. He was clearly making a joke from where I was sitting. “I thought he was clearly referring to Ed [Balls] because Ed is someone who likes to chunter from the frontbench. He is the shadow chunterer” Balls said if he had made such a remark at home his wife, Cooper, the shadow home secretary, would have clocked him one. David Cameron PMQs House of Commons Labour Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …