Queen guitarist Brian May is championing the rights of Britain’s animals, from foxes to rats. Now he talks about his latest battle – on behalf of badgers The shrubbery rustles and shakes, then Brian May falls out of the rhododendrons, dusts himself down and stumbles towards five fox cubs at play in a clearing. In the landscaped gardens of his historic home in the Surrey hills, the Queen guitarist looks every inch the semi-retired rock star: huge curly hair on gangly frame, black trousers, immaculate white Pumas and a dangerously unbuttoned white shirt. May has a plethora of projects to promote – every Queen album is being digitally remastered to celebrate the band’s 40th anniversary this year; next month he will tour the country with Kerry Ellis, who starred in his musical We Will Rock You, and with whom he has written a new album; he has just played guitar on a new Lady Gaga track; and a documentary he has made about the history of 3D will be broadcast on Sky. But instead, the 63-year-old musician and astrophysicist is crooning softly to the fox cub he has clutched to his chest. In the state-of-the-art animal rescue centre May has built in his garden, the guitarist behind Britain’s biggest-selling album (Queen’s Greatest Hits) is currently nursing back to health 140 hedgehogs and half-a-dozen abandoned fox cubs. He is also fast becoming the public face of the campaign to stop a cull of badgers proposed by the authorities to answer the concerns of farmers who are convinced the animals are infecting cattle with bovine TB. Multimillionaire rock legends often dabble in fast cars, metal detecting or saving rainforests. Is May worried his anti-cull campaign will be dismissed as just another rock star hobby? “Hobby, hmmm,” he murmurs, treating the word with a quiet disgust. “There aren’t many people from rock music or entertainment who put the time in that I have . . . this has become a huge part of my life. I don’t care what people say. I’m not doing it to make money. I’m not doing it because I want to be famous. Even if it was a ‘hobby’, why would I have that hobby? It could only be because I care about animals. This concerns us all. It’s not just something that concerns farmers.” May, who simultaneously channels the ethereal otherworldliness of a long-term resident of planet rock with the precision of a professional scientist, came to this passion through blogging. He began his “soapbox” before blogging was fashionable and although gentle and softly-spoken in person, he lets off steam online: his rants on subjects such as a review of Mika’s album by the Guardian’s Alexis Petridis have led him to be dubbed the world’s grumpiest rock star. His intention, he says, is to discuss important issues “so if you want to call it being grumpy, yeah, but it’s being concerned and trying to raise awareness of things which need to be fixed”. There are “joyful” posts about music, astronomy and 3D on the soapbox, but May is most profoundly anguished about cruelty towards animals. The blog “changed my life completely because it’s a two-way communication”, he says. “I started talking about animals with people on the soapbox.” May has never been an ordinary rock star. Helped by his father, he built his own guitar, Red Special, as a child. He abandoned his PhD on zodiacal light for fame with Queen but returned four years ago and completed it. He is a great friend of astronomer Sir Patrick Moore, with whom he has written Bang!, an accessible history of the universe. His love of animals has been less well documented but “it’s always been there”, says May a little defensively, highlighting his Queen song White Man as an example. He promised himself “if there was ever an opportunity in my life to make a difference for animals I would take it”. That opportunity came when someone contacted him online about a proposed cull of hedgehogs on the Scottish island of Uist. May was “aghast” and successfully fought to have the hedgehogs transported to the mainland instead. “When David Cameron started saying that if he got into power he would try to repeal the hunting act, my ears really pricked up and I thought if I can make a difference with hedgehogs maybe I can alert people to the possibility of going back into what I regard as something very barbaric,” he says. May, who is married to the actor Anita Dobson, and has three children from his first marriage, and three grandchildren, has set up a charity, Save Me, which rehabilitates injured wild animals, and is campaigning against the badger cull and any repeal of the hunting ban. Dobson is supportive but does not get involved. “Everybody has to work on their own passions,” says May very quietly. “So many people have said to me, foxes are just like rats, who gives a shit? And then you say, so a rat isn’t worthy of some consideration? Rats are so like human beings, it’s frightening. And it’s human beings who are relegating them to ‘vermin’. It gives people the feeling that they don’t have to treat animals with any kind of consideration, and to me that’s wrong.” May, who has long been an “imperfect vegetarian” but does not now eat meat or fish, “certainly wouldn’t” engage in direct action, such as releasing animals from scientific laboratories or mink from farms but thinks that animal rights has become a dirty word because its image has been “deliberately manipulated” by opponents who incorrectly characterise hunt saboteurs as violent. Hunting and killing animals for pleasure “boggles my mind”, he says. “I don’t understand why people are like that. I wrestle with that the whole time. It’s a sickness. I don’t think a healthy human being needs to be killing or causing pain to be happy. Why should that be? A decent life and a decent death – that’s what I ask for myself, and that’s what I would ask of any creature.” Ultimately, he believes animals have rights – both moral and legal – and wants to challenge “the mentality that says human beings are the only creatures on this planet who matter”. May happily plays with the fox cub he has named Caroline Spelman, after the environment secretary, but does not want to be caricatured as sentimental about animals. “I don’t really love badgers because they are furry and good-looking. It’s not about that. They are appealing, there’s no doubt, they are like little bears, especially when they are young. To me they are fascinating and rather mysterious because they have been in the British Isles longer than humans and they have their own social ways, not all of which is understood by us. “I can’t help but have a sort of awe for all wild creatures who have survived even the awfulness of what we have done to the world. We are the vandals in this world, there’s no doubt about it.” Despite being the first wild animal to be given legal protection in Britain, in 1973, the illegal “sport” of badger baiting and digging still goes on, and this year killing badgers is set to be sanctioned by the government – which wants to authorise farmers to trap and shoot them to reduce bovine TB. May is convinced this is the Conservatives’ political sop to the countryside lobby because, locked in coalition, they lack the numbers to repeal Labour’s hunting ban. “It’s a panacea that is being offered to farmers, look we are doing something, we are on your side, we’re going out and killing things,” he says. Bovine TB led to the slaughter of 24,899 cattle in England last year, costing £63m. Farmers insist the disease is a genuine crisis, and argue it has increased with a burgeoning badger population and that disease hotspots correspond to high badger populations, particularly in the West Country. May insists that it is still unproven that badgers pass TB to cattle (it is proven that cattle transmit it to badgers) and unproven that a cull would help. He quotes the conclusion of a 10-year culling trial in which 11,000 badgers were killed: culling cannot meaningfully contribute to the control of TB. After travelling to Cardiff to unsuccessfully plead with the Welsh assembly to reverse its own separate decision to cull badgers in Pembrokeshire, May admits he “got into a lot of trouble” for suggesting farmers should abandon cattle farming in bovine TB hotspots. “People called it a ridiculous idea but it came from a conversation I had with a farmer who had already switched from cows to sheep.” You would not knowingly bring up children in an area where there was radiation pollution, he says. “There was a nasty little piece” in the farming press that said telling farmers they should not farm cattle is “like telling Brian May he can’t play guitar and they said some people would welcome that. Ha ha, lovely. But there was a time when Queen was very uncool in Britain and what we did was play elsewhere. I actually took my family and my little boy went to school in LA partly because of that, so it’s not such a ridiculous suggestion.” “People talk about a science-based cull. I’m afraid to say people don’t know what science is,” he sighs. He believes bovine TB can be solved with vaccination – of badgers and cows. But the vaccination of cows is tricky: EU legislation forbids the export of vaccinated cows because it is difficult to distinguish between a vaccinated cow and one carrying bovine TB. In contrast, the vaccination of badgers is “eminently doable”, argues May. “All the research has been done. This business of ‘it’s not proven’ is really rubbish.” A badger vaccine is currently being trialled in Gloucestershire although the coalition cancelled five other trials put in place by Labour’s “exemplary” environment secretary Hilary Benn. The National Trust recently announced plans to vaccinate badgers on its land in Devon. May once said he stopped voting Conservative because of the party’s attitude towards wild animals. Now he says he is “very close” to the group Conservatives Against Fox Hunting, “who have the courage to stand up against the party line” but relates to the Green party more than any other. Did he vote Green at the last election? “You can’t ask me how I voted! It’s a secret vote. The truth is, I’m really not political. I just care about the animals. That’s my party. I’m a party that cares about changing attitudes to animals.” May has all the accoutrements of a multi-millionaire rock star – assistants running around, a stable full of gold discs and, incongruously, huge pink stems of rhubarb freshly picked from his organic garden – but says he scarcely gets time to enjoy the good things in his life. He has suffered depression, particularly after the death of his father and Freddie Mercury, and seems prone to pessimism, even bemoaning his follicular majesty when he has his photograph taken with his foxes. “It’s disappearing now,” he murmurs despondently, mussing his luxuriant curls. “The hair has seen better days.” Long nights awake debating with badger lovers and haters on the web can get “depressing”, he admits, especially when he is confronted with videos of animal cruelty. “It’s a thing you have to fight, being depressed about it. It’s very uncomfortable to see into the minds of people who are so full of violence. I find it very upsetting. It’s changed my life.Some mornings, I find it hard to deal with.” He pauses. “I get over it,” he shrugs and laughs at himself for the first time. Badgers Wildlife Animal welfare Patrick Barkham guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sarah Shourd says she is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and going back to Iran would be too traumatic An American woman released from prison in Iran has said she will not return there to stand trial alongside two fellow hikers charged with spying for the US. Sarah Shourd said she has post-traumatic stress disorder and going back to Iran would be “far too traumatic after what I’ve already been through”. The three Americans deny illegally entering the country and espionage, a charge that can carry the death penalty. They said they were on an innocent hiking trip during a vacation in Kurdistan, in the north of Iraq, when they were arrested by Iranian soldiers on 31 July 2009. Shourd was freed on bail in September 2010 on health grounds, and returned to the United States. Her fiance, Shanee Bauer, and friend Josh Fattal, both still imprisoned in Tehran, are due to start a second session of their trial on 11 May. Bauer and Fattal pleaded innocent at a first trial and Shourd denied the charges in absentia. They say they did not realise they had crossed into Iran. Shourd said they had visited the tourist village of Ahmed Awa and then hiked along a trail that local people had recommended. “When Shane and Josh and I met the Iranian soldiers, we were completely shocked. There was absolutely no indication of a border.” Shourd said she was diagnosed with the stress disorder by a clinical forensic psychologist and the five-page evaluation had been sent to the Iranian revolutionary court. She had not had a response to her refusal to go back for trial on the grounds that she risked “renewed or even worse psychological problems” if she returns. “My own mental health makes me even more afraid for what is happening with Shane and Josh,” Shourd said. “I was there for 14 months and Shane and Josh have now been there for over 21 months. I can’t imagine the toll it’s taken on them.” Shourd, 32, had been living with Bauer, a freelance journalist, in Damascus where she taught English. Fattal, an environmentalist, then joined them in Damascus for a holiday. Bauer and Shourd became engaged after they were arrested. Iran Middle East United States US foreign policy David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mahmoud Abbas says deal turns ‘black page of division’ after signing deal with Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal in Egypt Rival Palestinian groups have hailed the signing of a reconciliation agreement that could change the parameters of the search for Middle East peace, amid trenchant opposition from Israel. Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the head of Fatah, and Khaled Meshaal, the leader of the Islamist movement Hamas, met for the first time in five years at a ceremony in Cairo on Wednesday, where Egypt’s transitional government pulled off a striking coup by brokering the deal. Abbas, Yasser Arafat’s successor as leader of the PLO, said they had turned forever the “black page of divisions”. Meshaal, also seeking to strike a historically resonant note, declared that Hamas’s bitter rift with Fatah was “behind us”. The potential of the agreement was underlined by the presence of representatives from the UN, the EU and the Arab League – all now digesting the diplomatic implications for the region. “We are certain of success so long as we are united,” Abbas said. “Reconciliation clears the way not only to putting the Palestinian house in order but also to a just peace.” The deal will make it easier for the Palestinians to go to the UN in September and demand broad international recognition of an independent state – without a negotiated peace agreement with Israel. It provides for the creation of a joint caretaker government before Palestinian-wide elections next year. It does not require Hamas to recognise Israel. But sensitivities and difficulties ahead were underlined by an argument over protocol –whether Meshaal should sit on the podium with Abbas or among other delegates in the hall. The agreement was hailed in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and refugee camps in Lebanon. But the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, savaged the accord as “a tremendous blow to peace and a great victory for terrorism”. Israel, which signed the 1993 Oslo agreement with the PLO, shuns Hamas, viewing it as a terrorist group committed to the destruction of the Jewish state. The former Hamas prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, did not help the movement’s image when he praised Osama Bin Laden as an “Arab holy warrior”. “How can we make peace with a government when half of it calls for the destruction of Israel and glorifies the murderous Osama bin Laden?” Netanyahu said during a visit to London. Netanyahu has been lobbying for the EU and the US to cut aid to the PA if Hamas joins a new government. Meshaal, once the target of an assassination attempt by the Mossad, and now based in Damascus, Syria, spelled out Hamas’s goal: “Our aim is to establish a free and completely sovereign Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, whose capital is Jerusalem, without any settlers and without giving up a single inch of land and without giving up on the right of return [of Palestinian refugees].” The reconciliation brought recognisable signs of change to the streets of Gaza City hours before the signing of the pact. Palestine TV, the channel associated with Fatah and its de facto capital, Ramallah, was allowed to broadcast live from Gaza for the first time in four years. The event they televised, a demonstration in favour of the reconciliation agreement, began with a few dozen people chanting in the Square of the Unknown Soldier, and developed into a raucous party of thousands waving the yellow flags of Fatah which had been long hidden. Last week, when news of the agreement became public, activists headed to the same square to demonstrate their pleasure at the prospect of an end to division. Within minutes, they were cleared by Hamas policemen wielding batons. On Wednesday, the same policeman made no attempt to clear the crowds even when the green flags of Hamas supporters were lost in a sea of yellow Fatah flags. Rashid Mawad, a student, was waving a Fatah flag with one hand, his other still in a plaster cast following his beating at last week’s demonstration, his face still bruised. “I wasn’t optimistic last week but I feel different now,” he said. “I don’t know why, perhaps it’s because of the events in Syria,” he said. Mowayad Aish, an engineering student, was waving a Hamas flag a few metres away. “This is the first step towards ending the occupation of Palestine. It is true there have been difficulties in the past and there will be obstacles in the future but we must remember it is for the people that we want to end the division.” Hamas Palestinian territories Fatah Mahmoud Abbas Egypt Middle East Ian Black Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Well, the black hole we feared might open due to the critical mass of wingnuttery in one location didn’t quite occur Monday night in Colorado, but Sarah Palin’s “Tribute to the Troops” speech certainly gave us a look at the black hole that is her mind. Her speech was full of all kinds of classic Palinisms — such as her insistence that American troops never be placed under foreign command. (In reality, of course, U.S. soldiers have served under foreign commanders numerous times in the past century, including in critical theaters of World War II.) Or her bizarre formulation for world peace. But what really stood out was the fact that Palin’s speech — delivered less than 24 hours after the death of Osama bin Laden was announced, and full of all kinds of congratulations and praise to the troops and commanders who made it happen — deliberately omitted, in about as obvious and as graceless and clumsy a fashion imaginable, President Obama from the congratulations. Indeed, she instead congratulated George W. Bush. And then she went on to attack Obama for his foreign policy — and worse yet, imply to the gathered soldiers that he was undeserving of their loyalty — without, in fact, ever once even enunciating his name. Here’s how her congratulations went: PALIN: Last night — thank God, last night — all of us hearing the news that one evil leader — [applause] — one evil leader of Islamic extremists who was responsible for the murders of thousands of innocent Americans had finally met justice, at the hands of America’s finest. [Applause] It is my honor to get to speak of those finest in uniform today. We get to pay tribute to those finest United States military. I know that we’ll probably all remember as individuals where we were that September day when the horrific thoughts and ambitions and plans of this terrorist cut short the thoughts, ambitions and plans of beloved innocent Americans who were heartlessly murdered on September 11, 2001. God bless all the brave men and women in our military and our intelligence services who carried out the successful mission to bring Osama bin Laden to justice. And all those who had laid the groundwork over the years to make that victory possible. This historic action that was announced last night, it was the result of the diligence, and the hard work, and the character of countless American warriors. … Yesterday was a testament to the military’s dedication in relentlessly hunting down an enemy through many years of war. And we thank our president — we thank President Bush for having made the right calls to set up this victory. Then, as the Denver Post reported, she went on to attack Obama’s foreign policy: Striking a more political note, Palin said American troops need clear leadership. She cited the Obama administration’s policy in Libya as an example of “a lack of clarity.” “We can’t fight every war,” she said. “We can’t undo every injustice in the world. “We don’t go looking for dragons to slay.” Then she wrapped up on a truly scurrilous note: PALIN: We need leaders who embody the same standard as to which the men and women in uniform hold themselves. Remember: the true soldier fights because he loves what is behind him. Behind him here is tradition, it’s patriotism, it’s — it’s not a need for a fundamental transformation of America! It’s for a renewal of all that’s good about America! Does that sound to you like she’s telling these soldiers that President Obama is undeserving of their loyalty? It sure does to me. By the way, we haven’t gotten word yet on what Jerry Boykin’s speech contained. Considering that he’s been promoting the theory that President Obama and the radical liberals are working hand in glove with Bin Laden and the Islamic radicals to destroy America , well, let’s just guess that major portions of it had to be rewritten. We’ll report back when we learn more.
Continue reading …• Hit the auto-update button for the latest posts • Send your thoughts to barry.glendenning@guardian.co.uk • Tweet Barry if that’s your bag More emails: “There seems to be a lot of former Middlesbrough coaches out of work,” writes Brett LeQuesne. “Who gets a job first? Southgate, McClaren or Strachan?” “You’ve stumbled on Fergie’s tactical blackspot- he has a weakness for central midfielders called Darren (or variant),” writes Nick McLoughlin. “Fletcher was poor for his first 3 years, Gibson unproven, Ferguson blatant nepotism. Obviously the sort of genius that will secure you a podcast punditry award!” Speaking of podcast punditry awards … Not long now: Click-clack, click-clack, click-clack. The teams emerge from the tunnel down by the Stretford End at Old Trafford and ITV cut to an advert break. Their programme is sponsored by Ford, don’t you know? In the ITV studio: “There’s no way Sir Alex Ferguson is ever complacent but he’s obviously got one-eyed firmly on Chelsea,” says Gareth Southgate. “Berbatov’s got to take the challenge on tonight,” adds Gordon Strachan, shortly after talking about players who get the hump when they feel their manager doesn’t trust them. Another email: “I thought the bride looked lovely. Didn’t you?” asks Tim Smith. If you’re alluding to the Royal Wedding, Tim, I’m afraid I missed it. Like Gordon Brown (no, the other one), I wasn’t invited. I did, however, see photos and thought Kate looked very glam, if worryingly thin. An email: “Good to see Darren back in contention,” writes Gordon Brown, who feels compelled to write “real name, honest!” in brackets next to his sign-off. “He could be very useful over the next 5 games.” Please note: he wrote Darr e n, not Darr o n. Distinctions don’t get more important. Man Utd: Van der Sar, Rafael Da Silva, Smalling, Evans, O’Shea, Gibson, Scholes, Anderson, Valencia, Berbatov, Nani. Subs: Kuszczak, Evra, Owen, Giggs, Hernandez, Vidic, Fletcher. Schalke 04: Neuer, Uchida, Howedes, Metzelder, Escudero, Papadopoulos, Jurado, Farfan, Baumjohann, Draxler, Raul. Subs: Schober, Sarpei, Edu, Schmitz, Karimi, Huntelaar, Matip. Referee: Pedro Proenca (Portugal) Good evening everybody and welcome to tonight’s minute-by-minute coverage of Manchester United v Schalke in the Champions League semi-final second leg. Sir Alex Ferguson’s side won the first leg doing handstands , with only the heroics of Schalke’s highly coveted goalkeeper Manuel Neuer helping a surprisingly over-awed German side avoid total humiliation. Manchester United’s manager has said that complacency won’t be a problem in a second leg many are considering a formality for the Premier League leaders, but Wayne Rooney’s tight hamstring, last Sunday’s league defeat at the hands of Arsenal and what looks suspiciously like complacency have forced Ferguson to make nine changes and draft in the second string in order to rest several players ahead of United’s potential title-decider against Chelsea this Sunday. Should his plan backfire and United lose, he’ll have a lot of difficult questions to answer. With a berth in the final against Barcelona at stake, Ralf Rangnick’s Schalke squad have been making all the right noises ahead of tonight’s encounter, even though they almost didn’t make it to Manchester – their departure from Dusseldorf airport was delayed by 90 minutes yesterday as a result of visa problems encountered by their five non-EU squad members. Having put five past reigning Champions League holders Inter at the San Siro, they’ve every right to feel confident about pulling this tie out of the fire. After all, it is surely inconceivable that they can play any worse tonight than they did last Tuesday, isn’t it? Interestingly, only two of Schalke’s players have played at Old Trafford before: Raúl and Angelos Charisteas, with both finding their way on to the score-sheet for Real Madrid and Greece respectively. A portent for the night’s entertainment ahead? Probably not, but it’s something for neutrals to cling to. History, however, is very much on Manchester Un ited’s side: they’ve never lost by two goals at home in Europe and never surrendered their advantage after winning the first leg away from home. Champions League Manchester United Schalke Barry Glendenning guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I have no interest in seeing a picture of Osama Bin Laden dead . Bin Laden’s daughter already confirmed it for all ye Deathers . Releasing it won’t make an iota of difference with that crowd anyway. I agree with Gates and Hillary that no good will come of it. Jim Hoft will probably call it a fraud by using his keen photo shopping skills, and the right-wing crowd will have to prove their manliness in some form or another with other over-the-top nonsense. I would have much rather seen him captured and put on trial ultimately, even with all the extra complications. UPDATED: Now President Obama confirmed what I hoped he’d do: Obama: I won’t release bin Laden death photos In an interview with Steve Kroft for this Sunday’s 60 Minutes, President Obama says he won’t release post-mortem images of Osama bin Laden taken to prove his death. Video of the comments will appear on the CBS “Evening News” on Wednesday. Republican House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said Wednesday that the Obama administration should not release the gruesome post-The killing of Osama bin Ladenmortem images, saying it could complicate the job for American troops overseas. Rogers told CBS News he has seen a post-mortem photo. “The risks of release outweigh the benefits,” he said. “Conspiracy theorists around the world will just claim the photos are doctored anyway, and there is a real risk that releasing the photos will only serve to inflame public opinion in the Middle East.” I agree with Atrios — it’s not sad that young people don’t know anything about Bin Laden. I’m not sure why people are surprised and even upset that some teenagers don’t know who the hell bin Laden is. Bush said he didn’t matter, then we replaced him with Saddam as Hitler of the Week, and then that guy in Iran, and now Ghaddafi. I’m sure for even somewhat aware teens, IraqAndAfghanistanAnd911 are all jumbled up in a confusing nonsensical mess because, you know what? It is a big clusterfuck of a nonsensical mess, with al Qaeda and the Taliban and SaddamHitlerHussein and various #2s and #3s that die off like Spinal Tap drummers, and endless wars with no purpose that anyone, even their advocates, can articulate with any clarity. No one’s talked about bin Laden in years. The kids are fine. It’s our elite overlords that are all screwed up. At seven or ten years old I didn’t understand much of anything about the Vietnam War, and if I’d had video games, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, blogs, smart phones and Google, I doubt I would have known all that much more as I hit my teens. There was a draft still happening when I became a teenager so that got my attention big time, and I quickly learned as much as I could about that war. And before 2001, movies that were based in NYC almost always showed shots of the Twin Towers — but not for the last ten years.
Continue reading …We tug at some of those annoyingly slack plot lines that have left moviegoers tied up in knots and lost down plot holes Nothing nags like a film that leaves its plot or characters dangling. Some unanswered questions (did Cobb’s spinning top fall after Inception finished?) seem placed to give the audience something to mull over or argue about after the film has finished. Others (Beauty and the Beast’s Chip is clearly under 10, and the curse has been on the castle for 10 years, so did Mrs Potts give birth to him whilst she was a teapot? And who is his father?) look more like goofs than deliberate head scratchers. Yet they raise interesting, and sometimes disturbing, questions. Some loose threads are so neglectful they leave a lingering sense of injustice. Such is the case with Source Code, whose treatment of one of its central characters was so heinous it demanded this plot-hole-peppered Clip joint of protest. Schoolteacher Sean (we find out little else about him) is replaced by Jake Gyllenhaal’s Colter Stevens at the start of the film, and is never heard from again. Even the object of Sean’s affections, Christina, does not seem too bothered that the personality of the man she’s spent the last few years falling for has inexplicably changed before her very eyes. Who will weep for Sean? Poor old Sean, this one’s for you. 1) Colter’s fine: he’s got the girl, he’s saved the world. But what happened to Sean? Won’t his family and friends miss him? 2) In Chinatown, what happens to the fake Mrs Mulwray? 3) Who killed The Big Sleep’s Owen Taylor? Allegedly not even the film-makers know. (At least it’s fairly obvious who killed Canino .) 4) Back to the Future sees Marty return to a much happier, albeit alternate 1985 at the end of the film, having helped his parents fall in love with each other. But what happened to the Marty that lived in that alternate reality up until “other” Marty arrived? Was he replaced Sean-style? (“Where we’re going we don’t need roads … or to tie up any loose ends.”) 5) And one instructive clip : the end of Burn After Reading; numerous loose ends all tied up in a mere two-and-a-half minutes. Last week Oliver Pfeiffer waved his codpiece at the best of 80s cult fantasy. Here he sorts the Gelflings from the Skeksis in the clips that you suggested: 1) BrigadierBarking reminded us why Tim Curry is such a horny devil in Legend. 2) Neglected gem The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension was an ingenious suggestion by steenbeck . 3) rowingrob made us realise why the original, bleak ending does true justice to Terry Gilliam’s masterpiece Brazil. 4) goonergeof suggested Watson having his cake and eating it in Young Sherlock Holmes. 5) And greatpoochini went all dizzy on us with the reverse carousel clip in Something Wicked This Way Comes. guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Switch of WikiLeaks whistleblower suspect from maximum security jail means more rights and liberties in runup to trial The conditions under which the WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning is being detained in military prison have vastly improved in the wake of a sustained campaign against his earlier treatment, which some said amounted to torture. Since Manning was transferred from the Quantico marine base in Virginia to Fort Leavenworth on 20 April his detention regime has changed dramatically. He has been switched from maximum security to medium custody, which affords him many more rights and liberties, and he is no longer being held under a prevention of injury watch that imposed harsh conditions. The new regime has been revealed in a blog post from Manning’s lawyer, David Coombs, who is handling the US soldier’s forthcoming court martial. The prisoner, who worked as an army intelligence specialist in Iraq, has been charged with multiple counts relating to the leaking of a huge trove of state secrets to the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks. Under the old prevention order, Manning was forced to strip naked and wear just a smock at night, he had no bedding and was not permitted any personal items in his cell. He was kept locked up in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day in a windowless cell, and allowed only to walk in a yard on his own for that final hour. In Fort Leavenworth, by contrast, he has a large window that lets in natural light. He has a normal mattress and bedding and his clothes are not removed at night. Manning can have personal objects in his cell, including books and letters from family and friends, as well as legal documents relating to his case. He can write whenever he wants. His new life of detention is also considerably less lonely. There are five other pretrial prisoners and Manning spends much of the day in their company. His cell is connected to a common area used by four of the detainees with a television and exercise machine, table and shower area. The improvement in Manning’s prison life is testament to the power of a sustained campaign by his supporters and politicians to end what was deemed virtual torture against him. The Pentagon had been flooded with emails and lobbied by representatives such as Dennis Kucinich, a Democratic congressman from Ohio who took up Manning’s cause. The UK embassy in Washington has also been involved after the Guardian revealed that Manning is a British citizen by dint of his mother being Welsh. Kucinich said the lawyer’s account of Manning’s new conditions revealed a dramatic change “that can only be attributed to the public campaign that brought great pressure on the department of defence”. But Manning’s more relaxed treatment also raises serious questions about why he was treated so brutally for the nine months in which he was held at Quantico. When Barack Obama was asked about the case in March, he said he had been assured by the Pentagon that Manning’s treatment was appropriate. Kucinich said he would continue to press through Congress for answers to a number of questions: “Why was Manning treated the way he was in Quantico that was similar to torture? Who was responsible for that treatment, and what’s going to be done to ensure those individuals are held to account?” Bradley Manning WikiLeaks Human rights United States US national security Protest US military Torture Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Tory town hall in U-turn over radical scheme to outsource all services as staff morale sinks and public fight cuts A flagship Tory local authority has halted controversial “virtual council” plans to outsource all its services, after public opposition to spending cuts and a collapse in staff morale triggered a political revolt by backbenchers. Suffolk county council’s radical proposals, revealed by the Guardian last autumn , aimed to float off such services as waste disposal and child protection to private firms, social enterprises and charities. Potentially this move would have brought about hundreds of millions of pounds in savings but put thousands of jobs at risk. The council’s Tory leadership has now arranged a “period of reflection” to assess the plans, which are regarded by the government as a role model for municipal reform. The council has also promised to assess again the unpopular proposals to cut school crossing patrols, close libraries , and raise student travel-pass charges . The newly elected Conservative group leader, Mark Bee, said the pause gave “an opportunity to review everything”. He said that though the council could not avoid the tens of millions of pounds of imposed spending cuts, it would adopt a pragmatic, measured, approach to town hall reform and listen more closely to staff and local people. “We are not going to change things by revolution [but] by taking communities with us.” Bee added: “It’s not going to be about ‘no more cuts’ and keeping things as they are; things have got to change, but it is finding the right kind of change rather than just steaming into it.” Suffolk’s U-turn over its “virtual council” is the first big Tory rank-and-file mutiny over unpopular spending cuts in local government, and emerges as, nationally, the party braces itself for a disappointing performance in Thursday’s local elections. It comes amid signs that ministers are increasingly nervous about the potential unpopularity of outsourcing public services to the private sector . Events in Suffolk will be watched closely by Tory-led councils considering similar reform plans, including Bury in Greater Manchester. Labour’s shadow communities and local government secretary, Caroline Flint, said: “I’m all in favour of innovation and efficiency in local government, but the Conservatives running Suffolk county council have decided to put party political ideology ahead of running effective local services – and it’s backfired. “There is also a lesson for David Cameron and [the communities secretary] Eric Pickles here. Pushing through half-baked Tory experiments and ignoring the wishes of local people is more likely to put frontline services at risk than improve them.” Kathy Pollard, leader of Suffolk’s Liberal Democrat opposition, welcomed the “slowing down” of the council’s plans for cuts, but said it was important to read the small print of the proposed U-turn. The previous council leader, Jeremy Pembroke, who helped oversee the plans, known officially as the new strategic direction, stepped down in April amid concern about the deeply unpopular changes . An inquiry was begun into morale at the council’s legal department after an anonymous whistleblowing letter, sent to councillors, and believed to be from an employee, alleged staff there had been put under “unbearable pressure”. The letter refers to “the poisonous atmosphere that exists at present” in the council. Two council executives have resigned suddenly in recent weeks. Bee, who formally becomes leader of Suffolk council on 26 May, said that addressing staff morale would be a priority for the new administration. He paid tribute to council employees but added: “We need to spend more time listening to practitioners.” The changes have raised questions over the future of the council’s high-profile chief executive, Andrea Hill, who has been pilloried by media over her £218,000-a-year salary and dogged by concerns over her management style. Hill, , who said the new strategic direction was regarded by some ministers as a role model for local government, vociferously defended the “leading edge” proposals in an article for the council’s magazine. “It’s not an easy or comfortable place to be because we are challenging the old ways of doing things. We are developing a new model that will unsettle the status quo and, as we all know, any change makes ordinary people uncertain. Changing the system challenges vested interests and will therefore be attacked,” she wrote. Local government Privatisation Conservative and Liberal Democrat cabinet Local politics Economic policy Elections 2011 Patrick Butler guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Decision by IPCC to hold PC Simon Harwood’s disciplinary proceedings in open due to ‘exceptional public interest’ PC Simon Harwood, the police officer who inadvertently killed Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests, will be forced to explain his actions for the second time in public after a rare move to hold his disciplinary proceedings in the open. The Metropolitan police has been instructed by the national police watchdog to hold its gross misconduct hearing in public due to the “exceptional public interest” in the case. The jury in the inquest into Tomlinson’s death concluded on Tuesday that Harwood “unlawfully killed” the newspaper vendor, when he struck him with a baton and pushed him heavily to the ground in April 2009. Harwood spent three days answering questions at the inquest, in which he maintained his actions were proportionate and justified. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, is currently reviewing his decision last July not to bring criminal proceedings against Harwood, 43, a member of the Met’s Territorial Support Group. Harwood could now face prosecution for manslaughter, an imprisonable offence. The Independent Police Complaints Commission said the Met had not objected to its decision to hold the hearing in public. However the IPCC ruling went against the desires of Harwood and eleven other police witnesses, some of whom expressed concern over the impact that giving evidence in an open forum would have on their private lives. “Over the past weeks the evidence from our investigation has been heard, tested and challenged at the inquest,” said the IPCC commissioner for London, Deborah Glass. “The verdict speaks for itself. The conclusion of the inquest is an important stage in the process but it is not the final one, particularly as the inquest does not – indeed cannot – determine accountability, which is a matter of exceptional public concern in this case. I have therefore decided that due to the gravity and exceptional circumstances of this case, the misconduct proceedings should be heard in public.” The only other police officers disciplined at a public hearing were censured over their failure to respond to 999 calls for help from Colette Lynch, a 24-year-old woman who days later was killed by her ex-partner Percy Wright. Two Warwickshire police officers were disciplined for their failure to follow procedure when it emerged Lynch, her mother and her brother had called officers dozens of times to say Wright had been threatening her. In a statement, the Met said Harwood’s disciplinary hearing would take place “as soon as possible” but did not give a date or any other details. “The timing of the hearing is decided by the chair of the panel who must first consider the findings of the inquest and consult with all parties before setting a date.” The disciplinary panel, which will have the power to sack Harwood, will be chaired by Met Assistant Commissioner Lynne Owens. The other members of the panel will be a senior police officer and a layperson. The disciplinary charges against Harwood include that he struck Tomlinson with a baton and pushed him to the ground, and that “such dangerous actions inadvertently caused or contributed” to his death. He is also accused of using force that was “not necessary, proportionate or reasonable in the circumstances”. Harwood is expected to contest the charges. He said after Tuesday’s verdict that video evidence presented a “very different picture” to the impression he had when he struck Tomlinson near the Bank of England. His lawyer Colin Reynolds said of his client: “In particular, he wishes that he had known then all that he now knows about Mr Tomlinson’s movements and fragile state of health. PC Harwood did not intend, or foresee at the time, that his push would cause Mr Tomlinson to fall over, let alone that it would result in any injury.” Ian Tomlinson Police Metropolitan police Independent Police Complaints Commission Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …